Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Acts 2:31

in Acts 2

Foreseeing this, David spoke about the resurrection of the Christ, that He was not abandoned to Hades, nor did His body see decay.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

he foreseeing this spake of the resurrection of the Christ, that neither was he left unto Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption.

KJV

He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.

This verse in Acts 2

Commentary

12 notes on this verse

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Acts · Written before 1107.

"To raise up Christ in the flesh." He says this because according to His Divinity He has from eternity and always sat together with the Father; and he ascribes everything to the Father, so that the listeners might more easily accept what is being said.

This site's exposition

the patriarch David

on Acts 2:29-32

David's tomb is with us to this day, so the psalm's Holy One who does not see decay cannot be David. As a prophet who knew God's oath of 2 Samuel 7, David spoke about the resurrection of the Christ.

This site's exposition

the resurrection of the Christ

Albert Barnes concludes that David saw the Messiah's resurrection ahead of time by the spirit of prophecy. Clarke reports that the oldest manuscripts lack the words his soul, so Peter's sentence says only that He was not abandoned to Hades. Theophylact notes that Peter gives the Father the credit throughout.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers4 voices

A commentator

Theodoret of Cyrus

DIALOGUE 2 · Written before 458.

proposed

These and similar passages clearly point out that God the Word assumed not only a body but also a soul.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 6 · Written before 407.

proposed

Then - and even so he does not come to the mention of Christ, but what next? - he goes on with his encomium upon David, "Being therefore a prophet, and knowing that with an oath God had sworn unto him." But this he says, that were it but on account of the honor shown to David, and the descent from him, they may accept what is said concerning Christ's resurrection, as seeing that it would be an injury to the prophecy, and a derogating from their honor, if this were not the fact. "And knowing," he says, "that with an oath God had sworn unto him" - he does not say simply "promised" - "of the fruit of his loins after the flesh to raise up Christ, to seat Him upon his throne." Observe how he has again only hinted at what is sublime. For now that he has soothed them with his expression, he confidently adds this: The prophet saith it "of His resurrection, that neither was His soul left in hell, nor did His flesh see corruption." This again is wonderful: it shows that His resurrection was not like that of other men. For though death laid hold on Him, yet it did not its own work then.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 6 · Written before 407.

proposed

"Therefore being a Prophet, and knowing," etc. Do you observe how he now interprets the prophecy, and does not give it bare of comment? How did He "seat Him upon" David's "throne?" For the kingdom after the Spirit is in heaven. Observe how, along with the resurrection, he has also declared the kingdom in the fact of His rising again. He shows that the Prophet was under constraint: for the prophecy was concerning Him. Why does he say, not, Concerning His kingdom (it was a great matter), but "Concerning His resurrection?" And how did He seat Him upon his (David's) throne? Why, He reigns as King over Jews also, yea, what is much more, over them that crucified Him. "For His flesh saw no corruption." This seems to be less than resurrection, but it is the same thing.

A commentator

Oecumenius

Commentary on Acts · Written before 550.

proposed

And even so it did not apply to Christ; rather David is praised again by the phrase "Being therefore a prophet," so that through the honor paid to him and his offspring the one from him, they may accept the account concerning the resurrection of …

The Medieval Church1 voice

A commentator

Bede

Retractions on Acts · Written before 735.

proposed

Therefore, being a prophet and knowing that God had sworn to him with an oath that of the fruit of his loins one would sit on his throne, he spoke foresightfully about the resurrection of Christ, etc. In the Greek it is more: To raise …
4 more voices on this verse

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

He seeing this before,....

The Nineteenth Century3 voices

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

The Psalm is then affirmed to have had its only proper fulfilment in JESUS, of whose resurrection and ascension they were witnesses, while the glorious effusion of the Spirit by the hand of the ascended One, setting an infallible seal upon all, was even then witnessed by the thousands who stood listening to Him.

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

That his soul was not left in hell - The words ἡ ψυχη αυτου, his soul, are omitted by ABCD, Syriac, Coptic, Ethiopic, and Vulgate. Griesbach has left them out of the text, and Professor White says again, certissime delenda. The passage may be thus read: “He spake of the resurrection of Christ, that he was not left in hades, neither did his flesh see corruption.” For the various readings in this and the preceding verse, see Griesbach.
He, seeing this before ... - By the spirit of prophecy. From this it appears that David had distinct views of the great doctrines pertaining to the Messiah. Spake ... - See Psa 16:1-11. That his soul ... - See the notes on Act 2:27.

The words behind it

18 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Psalms 16:10

    For You will not abandon my soul to Sheol, nor will You let Your Holy One see decay.

    it leads to

    • Acts 2:27–31

      because You will not abandon my soul to Hades, nor will You let Your Holy One see decay.

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Revelation 1:18

      the Living One. I was dead, and behold, now I am alive forever and ever! And I hold the keys of Death and of Hades.

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Acts 13:35–38

      So also, He says in another Psalm: ‘You will not let Your Holy One see decay.’

    • Psalms 49:15

      But God will redeem my life from Sheol, for He will surely take me to Himself. Selah

    • Isaiah 14:9

      Sheol beneath is eager to meet you upon your arrival. It stirs the spirits of the dead to greet you—all the rulers of the earth. It makes all the kings of the nations rise…

  • Through

    Acts 2:27

    because You will not abandon my soul to Hades, nor will You let Your Holy One see decay.

    it leads to

    • Psalms 16:10

      For You will not abandon my soul to Sheol, nor will You let Your Holy One see decay.

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Revelation 20:13

      The sea gave up its dead, and Death and Hades gave up their dead, and each one was judged according to his deeds.

    • John 11:39

      “Take away the stone,” Jesus said. “Lord, by now he stinks,” said Martha, the sister of the dead man. “It has already been four days.”

Where this verse is studied

On this page

Studies54

By subject

Resurrection34 verses

Everything on Resurrection

About Acts

The Pentecost, El Greco, about 1600, Museo del Prado. Public domain.
The Pentecost, El Greco, about 1600, Museo del Prado. Public domain.
This page draws on 11 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Acts of the Apostles; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Bede, Retractions on Acts; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Acts of the Apostles; John Chrysostom, Homily on Acts 6; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Oecumenius, Commentary on Acts; Theodoret of Cyrus, DIALOGUE 2 and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Acts.