Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Hebrews 11:19

in Hebrews 11

Abraham reasoned that God could raise the dead, and in a sense, he did receive Isaac back from death.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

accounting that God is able to raise up, even from the dead; from whence he did also in a figure receive him back.

KJV

Accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead; from whence also he received him in a figure.

This verse in Hebrews 11

Commentary

21 notes on this verse

A commentator

Oecumenius

The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews · Written before 550.

"considering that God was able even to raise him from the dead." Do you see how by faith Abraham did everything? For he believed that God could even raise him from the dead after he was sacrificed. "from which, figuratively speaking." And Abraham himself and …

This site's exposition

he was tested, offered up Isaac

on Hebrews 11:17-19

The test set the command against the promise, Through Isaac your offspring will be reckoned. Abraham reasoned that God could raise the dead, and in a sense, he did receive Isaac back from death. The Greek for in a sense means in a figure, so Isaac's return pictures resurrection.

This site's exposition

God could raise the dead

John Wesley notes that no one had yet been raised from the dead when Abraham reasoned this way. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown trace the thought to Sarah's womb, which God had already brought to life. Matthew Henry adds that Abraham expected no reprieve on the mountain.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers5 voices

A commentator

Oecumenius

The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews · Written before 550.

proposed

That is, "from which, figuratively speaking," it is possible to understand it this way: From where Abraham also brought Isaac in a figure. For he says, he demonstrated some overwhelming obedience, and faith that overcame even the laws of nature, he again receives the son, …

A commentator

Origen of Alexandria

HOMILIES ON GENESIS 8.1 · Written before 253.

proposed

Give me your attention, you who have approached God, who believe yourselves to be faithful. Consider diligently how the faith of the faithful is proved from these words that have been read to us. "After these things," the text says, "God tested Abraham and said to him, 'Abraham, Abraham.' And he said, 'Here I am.' " Observe each detail that has been written. For, if one knows how to dig into the depth, one will find a treasure in the details. Perhaps also the precious jewels of the mysteries lie hidden where they are not esteemed.This man was previously called Abram. Nowhere do we read that God called him by this name or said to him, "Abram, Abram." For God could not call him by a name that was to be abolished, but he calls him by this name which God gave; and not only does God call him by this name, but he also repeats it. And when he had responded, "Here I am," God says to him, "Take your dearest son Isaac, whom you love, and offer him to me. Go," the text says, "into the high land, and there you shall offer him for a holocaust upon one of the mountains which I shall show you." Why God gave him this particular name and called him Abraham, he himself has interpreted. "Because," the text says, "I have made you a father of many nations." God gave him this promise when he had his son Ishmael, but it is promised him that the promise will be fulfilled in a son who will be born of Sarah. He had kindled his soul, therefore, in love for his son not only because of posterity but also in the hope of the promises. But this son, in whom these great and marvelous promises have been made, this son, I say, on whose account his name is called Abraham, "he is ordered to offer for a holocaust to the Lord on one of the mountains." What do you say to these things, Abraham? What kind of thoughts are stirring in your heart? […]

A commentator

Theodoret of Cyrus

INTERPRETATION OF HEBREWS 11 · Written before 458.

proposed

God promised to bring to light a vast number of Isaac's offspring like sand on the seashore, and he it was who bade Isaac become a victim. Beset by the two conflicting thoughts, then, and with nature tearing at him more harshly than any torturer, …

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Hebrews 25 · Written before 407.

proposed

And how this was, the Apostle himself has taught us, by saying, "accounting that God was able to raise Him up, even from the dead." By the same faith (he means) by which he believed that God gave what was not, and raised up the dead, by the same was he persuaded that He would also raise him up after he had been slain in sacrifice. For it was alike impossible (to human calculation, I mean) from a womb which was dead and grown old and already become useless for child-bearing to give a child, and to raise again one who had been slain. But his previous faith prepared the way for things to come. And see; the good things came first, and the hard things afterwards, in his old age. But for you, on the contrary, (he says) the sad things are first, and the good things last. This for those who dare to say, "He has promised us the good things after death; perhaps He has deceived us." He shows that "God is able to raise up even from the dead," and if God be able to raise from the dead, without all doubt He will pay all that He has promised. But if Abraham so many years before, believed "that God is able to raise from the dead," much more ought we to believe it. Thou seest (what I at first said) that death had not yet entered in and yet He drew them at once to the hope of the resurrection, and led them to such full assurance, that when bidden, they even slay their own sons, and readily offer up those from whom they expected to people the world.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Hebrews 25 · Written before 407.

proposed

And hence he was not afraid to say, that God was "able to raise him up, even from the dead." "From whence also he received him in a figure," that is in idea, by the ram, he means. How? The ram having been slain, he was saved: so that by means of the ram he received him again, having slain it in his stead. But these things were types: for here it is the Son of God who is slain. And observe, I beseech you, how great is His lovingkindness. For inasmuch as a great favor was to be given to men, He, wishing to do this, not by favor, but as a debtor, arranges that a man should first give up his own son on account of God's command, in order that He Himself might seem to be doing nothing great in giving up His own Son, since a man had done this before Him; that He might be supposed to do it not of grace, but of debt. For we wish to do this kindness also to those whom we love, others, to appear first to have received some little thing from them, and so give them all: and we boast more of the receiving than of the giving; and we do not say, We gave him this, but, We received this from him. "From whence also" (are his words) "he received him in a figure," i.e. as in a riddle (for the ram was as it were a figure of Isaac) or, as in a type. For since the sacrifice had been completed, and Isaac slain in purpose, therefore He gave him to the Patriarch.
13 more voices on this verse

The Church Fathers3 voices

A commentator

Ephrem the Syrian

COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS · Written before 373.

proposed

"By faith Abraham, when he was tested, offered up Isaac" as a victim, even though he had received this child with the promise that through him his descendants would have been named. And Abraham never doubted, not even when he was about to kill him, …

A commentator

Theodore of Mopsuestia

FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 11.19 · Written before 428.

proposed

He obtained it in accordance with his faith. For believing in the resurrection, he received him who had died symbolically. For the fact that he suffered nothing, although he fully expected to die, was a symbol of the one who would truly rise, inasmuch as, …

A commentator

Clement of Alexandria

The Instructor Book 1 · Written before 215.

proposed

Isaac is a type of the infant Lord as son, and, in fact, Isaac was the son of Abraham as Christ is of God, victim as was the Lord. But he was not cut down like the Lord; no, Isaac only carried the wood of the sacrifice, as the Lord did his cross. He laughed mystically by way of prophesying that the Lord fills us with joy, we who have been redeemed by his blood. He did not suffer but left to the Logos, as is fitting, the first fruits of suffering. What is more, because he was not immolated, he signifies also the divinity of the Lord. For after his burial, Jesus was raised up, thus leaving suffering behind, just as Isaac had escaped the sacrifice.

The Medieval Church3 voices

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Hebrews · Written before 1107.

proposed

It is worthy of admiration that he, having no other son in whom he could expect the fulfillment of the promise, but having only one, nevertheless offered him as a sacrifice. Why then? Because of his great faith. For he believed that God was "able," …

A commentator

Photios I of Constantinople

FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 11.19 · Written before 893.

proposed

One can understand the statement "hence, figuratively speaking, he did receive him back" in the following sense: "Abraham received Isaac in a figurative way." For, as he says, since he showed some untold obedience and a faith that conquers even the laws of nature itself, …

A commentator

Thomas Aquinas

Commentary on Hebrews · Written before 1274.

proposed

606. – Then (v. 19b) he shows what he merited by faith; because, since nothing remained but to immolate him, an angel called him, and, in place of his son, he immolated a ram sticking fast by the horns. But this was a parable, i.e., …

The Puritans and the Awakening4 voices

Accounting that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead,.... Abraham did not go about this affair without thought; and yet he did not consult with flesh and blood; his reasoning was the reasoning of faith; and the conclusion of it was, not that he believed that God would raise his son from the dead, but that he was able to do it.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

(2.) He received him from the dead, for he gave him up for dead; he was as a dead child to him, and the return was to him no less than a resurrection. (3.) This was a figure or parable of something further. It was a figure of the sacrifice and resurrection of Christ, of whom Isaac was a type.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

His faith was supported by the sense he had of the mighty power of God, who was able to raise the dead; he reasoned thus with himself, and so he resolved all his doubts.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

The advantages that we have in the gospel for the exercise of this grace above what those had who lived in the times of the Old Testament,

The Nineteenth Century3 voices

Accounting that God was able to raise him up even from the dead - And that he would do it; for so Abraham evidently believed, and this idea is plainly implied in the whole narrative. There was no other way in which the promise could be fulfilled; and Abraham reasoned justly in the case. He had received the promise of a numerous posterity. He had been told expressly that it was to be through this favorite child. He was now commanded to put him to death as a sacrifice, and he prepared to do it.

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

It was then that Abraham saw Christ's day (Joh 8:56): accounting God was able to raise even from the dead: from which state of the dead he received him back as a type of the resurrection in Christ.

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

To raise him up, even from the dead - Abraham staggered not at the promise through unbelief, but was strong in faith, giving glory to God. The resurrection of the dead must have been a doctrine of the patriarchs; they expected a heavenly inheritance, they saw they died as did other men, and they must have known that they could not enjoy it but in consequence of a resurrection from the dead. He received him in a figure - Εν παραβολῃ· In my discourse on parabolical writing at the end of Matthew 13, I have shown (signification #9) that παραβολη sometimes means a daring exploit, a jeoparding of the life; and have referred to this place. I think it should be so understood here, as pointing out the very imminent danger he was in of losing his life. The clause may therefore be thus translated: “Accounting that God was able to raise him up from the dead, from whence he had received him, he being in the most imminent danger of losing his life.” It is not, therefore, the natural deadness of Abraham and Sarah to which the apostle alludes, but the death to which Isaac on this occasion was exposed, and which he escaped by the immediate interference of God.

The words behind it

15 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Ephesians 3:20

    Now to Him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to His power that is at work within us,

    it leads to

    • 2 Corinthians 9:8

      And God is able to make all grace abound to you, so that in all things, at all times, having all that you need, you will abound in every good work.

    • Romans 4:21

      being fully persuaded that God was able to do what He had promised.

    • Jeremiah 32:27

      “Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh. Is anything too difficult for Me?

    • Jude 1:24

      Now to Him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you unblemished in His glorious presence, with great joy—

    • 1 Corinthians 2:9

      Rather, as it is written: “No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no heart has imagined, what God has prepared for those who love Him.”

  • Through

    Matthew 9:28

    After Jesus had entered the house, the blind men came to Him. “Do you believe that I am able to do this?” He asked. “Yes, Lord,” they answered.

    it leads to

    • Mark 9:23–24

      “If You can?” echoed Jesus. “All things are possible to him who believes!”

    • Matthew 13:58

      And He did not do many miracles there, because of their unbelief.

    • Matthew 8:2

      Suddenly a leper came and knelt before Him, saying, “Lord, if You are willing, You can make me clean.”

Where this verse is studied

On this page

Studies65

On this chapter

Show the next 6 titles
Show the next 6 titles

About Hebrews

This page draws on 19 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor Book 1; Ephrem the Syrian, COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Chrysostom, Homily on Hebrews 25; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament; Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Oecumenius, The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews; Origen of Alexandria, HOMILIES ON GENESIS 8.1; Photios I of Constantinople, FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 11.19; Theodore of Mopsuestia, FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 11.19; Theodoret of Cyrus, INTERPRETATION OF HEBREWS 11; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Hebrews and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Hebrews.