Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Acts 7:24

in Acts 7

And when he saw one of them being mistreated, Moses went to his defense and avenged him by striking down the Egyptian who was oppressing him.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

And seeing one of them suffer wrong, he defended him, and avenged him that was oppressed, smiting the Egyptian:

KJV

And seeing one of them suffer wrong, he defended him, and avenged him that was oppressed, and smote the Egyptian:

This verse in Acts 7

Commentary

11 notes on this verse

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

If they had but understood the signs of the times, they might have taken this for the dawning of the day of their deliverance; but they understood not, they did not take this, as it was designed, for the setting up of a standard, and sounding of a trumpet, to proclaim Moses their deliverer.

This site's exposition

When Moses was forty years old

on Acts 7:23-25

At forty Moses killed an Egyptian oppressor, an attempt at deliverance forty years before God's time. Stephen adds that Moses expected his brothers to understand that God was using him, but they did not, a failure to know a deliverer.

This site's exposition

went to his defense

Albert Barnes notes from Exodus 2:11-12 that Moses killed the Egyptian and buried him in the sand. Theophylact and Oecumenius trace the act to zeal for God, and Oecumenius compares it with the zeal of Phinehas. Chrysostom observes that Stephen's hearers are still listening at this point.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers3 voices

A commentator

Oecumenius

Commentary on Acts · Written before 550.

proposed

Moses killed the Egyptian, not moved by anger or wrath, but by zeal. For whatever is done for the sake of God's word is devoutness; and though it be murder when done for God, it is not murder. Now Phinehas, having slain two with one …

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 16 · Written before 407.

proposed

"And seeing one of them suffer wrong, he defended him, and avenged him that was oppressed, and smote the Egyptian: for he supposed his brethren would have understood how that God by his hand would deliver them: but they understood not." See how up to this point he is not yet offensive to them; how they listened to him while he said all this. And "his face," we read, "was as the face of an angel." "For he supposed," etc. And yet it was by deeds that his championship was shown; what intelligence was there need of here? but still for all this "they understood not." For what though they killed him not actually? In intention they did kill, as did the others in the former case. There, they sold out of their own into a strange land: here, they drive from one strange land into another strange land: in the former case, one in the act of bringing them food; in this, one in the act of giving them good counsel; one to whom, under God, the man was indebted for his life! Mark how it shows the truth of that saying of Gamaliel's, "If it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it." See the plotted-against eventually becoming the authors of salvation to those plotting against them: the people, plotting against itself, and itself plotted against by others; and for all this, saved! A famine, and it did not consume them: nor was this all: but they were saved by means of the very person, whom they had expected to be destroyed by their means. A royal edict, and it did not consume them: nay then most did their number increase, when he was dead "who knew" them. Their own Saviour they wished to kill, but for all that, they had not power to do it. Do you observe, that by the means whereby the devil tried to bring to naught the promise of God, by those very means it was advanced?

A commentator

Oecumenius

Commentary on Acts · Written before 550.

proposed

For the Savior, seeing that those from Israel endured covetousness terribly (for Satan leapt upon them as though crushing them), had mercy and intended to free them. Having somehow killed the one destined to do wrong, he hid him in the earth, that is, he …

The Medieval Church1 voice

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Acts · Written before 1107.

proposed

"Having struck down the Egyptian," Moses avenged the one being oppressed by him. He did not kill the Egyptian out of frenzy or anger, but out of zeal for God. And that which is done out of zeal for God, even if it be killing, …

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

And seeing one of them suffer wrong,....
3 more voices on this verse

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

He applies this to those that prosecuted him, and sat in judgment upon him, sharply reproving them for their wickedness, by which they had brought upon themselves the ruin of their place and nation, and then could not bear to hear of it,

The Nineteenth Century2 voices

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

Smote the Egyptian - See this explained, Exo 2:11, Exo 2:12 (note).
Suffer wrong - The wrong or injury was, that the Egyptian was smiting the Hebrew, Exo 2:11-12. Smote the Egyptian - He slew him, and buried him in the sand,

The words behind it

13 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

  • καὶAnd

    kaiG2532 →9120 times

  • ἰδώνhaving seen

    idonG1492 →374 times

  • τιναa certain one

    tinaG5100 →528 times

  • ἀδικούμενονbeing wronged

    adikoumenonG91 →28 times

  • ἠμύνατοhe defended [him]

    emunatoG292 →

  • καὶand

    kaiG2532 →9120 times

  • ἐποίησενhe did

    epoiesenG4160 →569 times

  • ἐκδίκησινvengeance

    ekdikesinG1557 →

  • τῷfor the [one]

    toG3588 →19766 times

  • καταπονουμένῳbeing oppressed

    kataponoumenoG2669 →

  • πατάξαςhaving struck down

    pataxasG3960 →10 times

  • τὸνthe

    tonG3588 →19766 times

  • Αἰγύπτιον.Egyptian.

    aiguptionG124 →5 times

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

Where this verse is studied

About Acts

The Pentecost, El Greco, about 1600, Museo del Prado. Public domain.
The Pentecost, El Greco, about 1600, Museo del Prado. Public domain.

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); John Calvin, Commentary upon the Acts of the Apostles; John Chrysostom, Homily on Acts 16; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Oecumenius, Commentary on Acts and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Acts.