Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Genesis 3:11

in Genesis 3

“Who told you that you were naked?” asked the LORD God. “Have you eaten from the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?”

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?

KJV

And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?

This verse in Genesis 3

Commentary

9 notes on this verse

This site's exposition

Who told you that you were naked

on Genesis 3:11-13

God asks the man who told him he was naked, and whether he has eaten from the tree. The man answers by naming the woman, and behind her the God who gave her to him. The woman answers by naming the serpent, who deceived her. Both of them finish the same way, by saying that they ate.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers3 voices

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

TWO BOOKS ON GENESIS AGAINST THE MANICHAEANS 2.16.24 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

When Adam heard God's voice, he answered that he hid because he was naked. His answer was a wretched error, as if a man naked, as God had made him, could be displeasing to him. It is a distinguishing mark of error that whatever anyone finds personally displeasing he imagines is displeasing to God as well. We should understand in a lofty sense the words of the Lord, "Who told you that you were naked, unless because you have eaten from that tree about which I told you that from it alone you should not eat?" Before he was naked of any dissimulation and clothed with the divine light. From this light he turned away and turned toward himself. This is the meaning of his having eaten from that tree. He saw his nakedness, and it was displeasing to himself because he did not have anything of his own.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

HOMILIES ON GENESIS 17.22 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

You see, since he was not unaware of the truth when he asked them but rather knew, and knew very well, he shows consideration for their limitations so as to demonstrate his own loving kindness, and he invites them to make admission of their faults.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Commentary (church-history corpus) · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

Where could you have got the knowledge of this, he says, and be covered in such confusion, unless you have been so intemperate as to despise my command? Notice, dearly beloved, the excess of God's goodness, how, in this manner of one friend communing with another and remonstrating with him over transgression of his instructions, he enters into dialog with Adam. "'Who told you that you are naked unless you have eaten from that one tree I told you not to eat from?'" Even the phrase, "that one tree," bears a slight nuance: Surely I didn't inhibit your enjoyment? it is saying. Did I not relieve you of every need, give you authority over everything in the garden, and only instruct you to keep away from that one thing so that you might be in a position to know that you are subject to direction and required to show some obedience? So what kind of terrible in difference is this that, despite your having such great enjoyment, you could not bear to keep away from that one thing but rather hastened in that manner to violate the command given you by me and envelop yourself in so many excesses? What good was that to you? Hadn't I warned you of that in advance? Wasn't it my intention to check you be forehand with fear of punishment and so make you more cautious? Didn't I tell you what would be likely to happen? Didn't I for that reason forbid your eating that fruit so that you wouldn't fall victim to those faults? Who could consider you deserving of excuse now that you've proved to be so unresponsive despite so many directions?

The Medieval Church2 voices

A commentator

Symeon the New Theologian

DISCOURSES 5.5 · Written before 1022.

proposed

Do you see, dear friend, how patient God is? For when he said, "Adam, where are you?" and when Adam did not at once confess his sin but said, "I heard your voice, O Lord, and realized that I am naked and hid myself," God …

A commentator

Bede

Commentary on Genesis (Hexaemeron) · Written before 735.

proposed

Therefore, the Lord willing now to punish sinners asked according to the manner of justice more than that penalty, from which they were already compelled to be ashamed, For he says, Who told you that you were naked, unless you have eaten from the tree …
3 more voices on this verse

The Puritans and the Awakening3 voices

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

I commanded thee to the contrary." Sin appears most plain and most sinful in the glass of the commandment, therefore God here sets it before Adam; and in it we should see our faces. The question put to the woman was, What is this that thou hast done?

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — odd-straight-quotes

And he said,....

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

I commanded thee to the contrary." Sin appears most plain and most sinful in the glass of the commandment, therefore God here sets it before Adam; and in it we should see our faces. The question put to the woman was, What is this that thou hast done?

How the passage was read

What the Jewish commentators add

Bilti with a lamed prefixed to it ( le-vilti ) means “not to.” Without this lamed ( bilti ) it means “only.”
Ibn Ezra: Spain, 1089–1167 · Ibn Ezra on Genesis 3:11:1, via Sefaria, Ibn Ezra's commentary on the Pentateuch, tran. and annot. by H. Norman Strickman and Arthur M. Silver. Menorah Pub., 1988-2004
2 more on this passage, in their own words ▾
The sense of it is to say: “The woman whom Thy Honor Himself gave me for a help, she gave me of the tree, and I thought that whatever she says to me is a help and benefit to me.
Ramban: Spain, 1194–1270 · Ramban on Genesis 3:12:1, via Sefaria, Commentary on the Torah by Ramban (Nachmanides). Translated and annotated by Charles B. Chavel. New York, Shilo Pub. House, 1971-1976
ואירא, this feeling of fear is similar to that experienced by the Jewish people in Exodus,30 when, because of the sin of the golden calf, the people were afraid to face him after his face radiated light when he returned from Mount Sinai.
Sforno: Italy, c. 1475–1550 · Sforno on Genesis 3:10:1, via Sefaria, Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash

This section is reception history: how the passage was read and kept in the Jewish tradition. Where a reading parts from an essential of the Christian faith, the section says so at that point.

Texts and citation data: Sefaria; each excerpt follows its version’s licence. 2 further sources are cited on this chapter that carry no English text this site may quote or only restate the verse.

The words behind it

15 Hebrew words

Every Hebrew word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

  • וַיֹּ֕אמֶרand he said

    vaiyomerH559 →5305 times

  • מִ֚יwho?

    miH4310 →423 times

  • הִגִּ֣ידdid he tell

    higidH5046 →370 times

  • לְךָ֔to <the> you

    lekha

  • כִּ֥יthat

    kiH3588 →4482 times

  • עֵירֹ֖ם[were] naked

    ʾeiromH5903 →10 times

  • אָ֑תָּהyou

    ʾatahH859 →1094 times

  • הֲמִן־¿ from

    hamin-H4480 →1188 times

  • הָעֵ֗ץthe tree

    haetzH6086 →328 times

  • אֲשֶׁ֧רwhich

    ʾasherH834 →5497 times

  • צִוִּיתִ֛יךָI commanded you

    tzivitikhaH6680 →494 times

  • לְבִלְתִּ֥יto not

    leviltiH1115 →112 times

  • אֲכָל־to eat

    ʾakhol-H398 →810 times

  • מִמֶּ֖נּוּfrom it

    mimenuH4480 →1188 times

  • אָכָֽלְתָּ׃have you eaten

    ʾakhaltaH398 →810 times

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Romans 3:20

    Therefore no one will be justified in His sight by works of the law. For the law merely brings awareness of sin.

    it leads to

    • Galatians 2:16

      know that a man is not justified by works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have believed in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by faith in…

    • Acts 13:39

      Through Him everyone who believes is justified from everything you could not be justified from by the law of Moses.

    • Romans 3:28

      For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the law.

    • Galatians 2:19

      For through the law I died to the law so that I might live to God.

    • Romans 4:15

      because the law brings wrath. And where there is no law, there is no transgression.

  • Through

    Genesis 4:10

    “What have you done?” replied the LORD. “The voice of your brother’s blood cries out to Me from the ground.

    it leads to

    • Hebrews 12:24

      to Jesus the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood that speaks a better word than the blood of Abel.

    • Psalms 72:14

      He will redeem them from oppression and violence, for their blood is precious in his sight.

  • Through

    Psalms 50:21

    You have done these things, and I kept silent; you thought I was just like you. But now I rebuke you and accuse you to your face.

    it leads to

    • Romans 2:4–5

      Or do you disregard the riches of His kindness, tolerance, and patience, not realizing that God’s kindness leads you to repentance?

Where this verse is studied

About Genesis

Adam and Eve Are Driven out of Eden — Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain
Adam and Eve Are Driven out of Eden — Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain
This page draws on 9 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Augustine of Hippo, TWO BOOKS ON GENESIS AGAINST THE MANICHAEANS 2.16.24; Bede, Commentary on Genesis (Hexaemeron); Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Calvin, Commentary on Genesis; John Chrysostom, HOMILIES ON GENESIS 17.22; John Chrysostom, Commentary (church-history corpus); John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament (1748-1763); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible and Symeon the New Theologian, DISCOURSES 5.5.