Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Luke 22:60

in Luke 22

“Man, I do not know what you are talking about,” Peter replied. While he was still speaking, the rooster crowed.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

But Peter said, Man, I know not what thou sayest. And immediately, while he yet spake, the cock crew.

KJV

And Peter said, Man, I know not what thou sayest. And immediately, while he yet spake, the cock crew.

This verse in Luke 22

Commentary

12 notes on this verse

A commentator

Ambrose of Milan

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 397.

That is, I know not your blasphemies. But we make excuse for him. He did not excuse himself. For an involved answer is not sufficient for our confessing Jesus, but an open confession is required. And therefore Peter is not represented to have answered this deliberately, for he afterwards recollected himself, and wept.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers2 voices

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 430.

proposed

(ut sup.) The cock-crow we understand to have been after the third denial of Peter, as Mark has expressed it.

A commentator

Cyril of Alexandria

COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 149 · Written before 444.

proposed

We do not say that the denial took place in order that Christ's words might come true. We say rather that his object was to forewarn the disciple, inasmuch as what was about to happen did not escape Christ's knowledge. The misfortune, therefore, happened to the disciple from the cowardice of human nature. Since Christ had not risen from the dead, he had not yet abolished death and wiped corruption away. The fear of undergoing death was something beyond human endurance.

The Medieval Church3 voices

A commentator

Bonaventure

Commentary on Luke, Chapter 22 · Written in the 13th century.

proposed

And because Peter still did not take heed for himself, he therefore repeated the denial a third time. Whence it is added: And after an interval of about one hour, a certain other man affirmed, saying: Truly this man also was with him, for he …

A commentator

Bede

On the Gospel of Luke · Written before 735.

proposed

And Peter said: Man, I do not know what you are saying. And immediately, while he was still speaking, the rooster crowed. The sacred Scripture often signifies the merit of causes through the state of times. Hence Peter, who denied in the middle of the …

A commentator

Bede

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 735.

proposed

Holy Scripture is often wont to mark the character of certain events by the nature of the times in which they take place. Hence Peter who sinned at midnight repented at cock-crow; for it follows, And immediately, while he yet spake, the cock crew. The error he committed in the darkness of forgetfulness, he corrected by the remembrance of the true light.
6 more voices on this verse

The Medieval Church1 voice

A commentator

Bede

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 735.

proposed

This cock must, I think, be understood mystically as some great Teacher, who rouses the listless and sleepy, saying, Awake, ye righteous, and sin not.

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

And Peter said, man, I know not what thou sayest,....

The Nineteenth Century4 voices

The verses we have now read, describe the fall of the apostle Peter. It is a passage which is deeply humbling to the pride of man, but singularly instructive to true Christians. The fall of Peter has been a beacon to the Church, and has probably preserved myriads of souls from destruction. It is a passage which supplies strong proof that the Bible is inspired, and that Christianity is from God.
The verses we have now read, describe the fall of the apostle Peter. It is a passage which is deeply humbling to the pride of man, but singularly instructive to true Christians. The fall of Peter has been a beacon to the Church, and has probably preserved myriads of souls from destruction. It is a passage which supplies strong proof that the Bible is inspired, and that Christianity is from God. If the Christian religion had been the invention of uninspired men — then its first historians would never have told us that one of the chief apostles denied his Master three times. The story of Peter's fall teaches us, firstly — how small and gradual are the steps by which men may go down into great sins. The various steps in Peter's fall, are clearly marked out by the Gospel-writers. They ought always to be observed in reading this part of the apostle's history. The first step was proud self-confidence . Though all denied Christ — yet he never would! He was ready to go with Him both to prison and to death! The second step was indolent neglect of prayer . When his Master told him to pray, lest he should enter into temptation — he gave way to drowsiness, and was found asleep. The third step was vacillating indecision . When the enemies of Christ came upon Him, Peter first fought, then ran away, then turned again, and finally "followed afar off." The fourth step was mingling with bad company . He went into the high priest's house and sat among the servants by the fire, trying to conceal his religion, and hearing and seeing all kinds of evil. The fifth and last step was the natural consequence of the preceding four. He was overwhelmed with fear when suddenly charged with being a disciple. The snare was round his neck. He could not escape. He plunged deeper into error than ever. He denied his blessed Master three times.
PETER had fallen terribly. He had denied his Master, denied Him repeatedly, denied Him with oaths, denied Him in His Presence, while His Master was being smitten and falsely charged. He denied Him, though he was an Apostle. Denied him, though he had declared that should all men forsake Him, yet he never would. It was a sad, sad sin. Remember what led up to it. It was, first, Peter's presumption and self-confidence. He reckoned that he could never stumble and for that very reason he speedily fell. A haughty spirit goes before a fall.
PETER had fallen terribly. He had denied his Master, denied Him repeatedly, denied Him with oaths, denied Him in His Presence, while His Master was being smitten and falsely charged. He denied Him, though he was an Apostle. Denied him, though he had declared that should all men forsake Him, yet he never would. It was a sad, sad sin. Remember what led up to it. It was, first, Peter's presumption and self-confidence. He reckoned that he could never stumble and for that very reason he speedily fell. A haughty spirit goes before a fall. Oh, that we might look to the roots of bitter flowers and destroy them! If presumption is flourishing in the soil of our hearts today we shall soon see the evil fruit which will come of it. Reliance upon our firmness of character, depth of experience, clearness of insight, or maturity in grace will, in the end, land us in disgraceful failure. We must either deny ourselves, or we shall deny our Lord. If we cleave to self-confidence, we shall not cleave to Him. Immediately, Peter's denial was owing to cowardice. The brave Peter in the presence of a maid was ashamed. He could not bear to be pointed out as a follower of the Galilean. He did not know what might follow upon it—but he saw his Lord without a friend and felt that it was a lost cause and he did not care to avow it. Only to think that Peter, under temporary discouragement, should play the coward! Yet cowardice treads upon the heels of boasting—he that thinks he can fight the world will be the first man to run away. His sin also arose from his want of watchfulness. His Master had said to him, "What, could you not watch with Me one hour?" And no doubt there was more meaning in the words than appeared on the surface. The Lord several times said to him, "Pray, that you enter not into temptation." The words were repeated with deep impressiveness, for they were greatly needed.

The words behind it

16 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

7 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Luke 22:34

    But Jesus replied, “I tell you, Peter, the rooster will not crow today until you have denied three times that you know Me.”

    it leads to

    • John 13:38

      “Will you lay down your life for Me?” Jesus replied. “Truly, truly, I tell you, before the rooster crows, you will deny Me three times.

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Matthew 26:34

      “Truly I tell you,” Jesus declared, “this very night, before the rooster crows, you will deny Me three times.”

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Mark 14:71–72

      But he began to curse and swear, “I do not know this man of whom you speak!”

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Mark 14:30

      “Truly I tell you,” Jesus replied, “this very night, before the rooster crows twice, you will deny Me three times.”

    • Matthew 26:74

      At that he began to curse and swear to them, “I do not know the man!” And immediately a rooster crowed.

  • Through

    John 18:27

    Peter denied it once more, and immediately a rooster crowed.

    it leads to

    • Luke 22:60–62

      “Man, I do not know what you are talking about,” Peter replied. While he was still speaking, the rooster crowed.

    • Matthew 26:74–75

      At that he began to curse and swear to them, “I do not know the man!” And immediately a rooster crowed.

Where this verse is studied

About Luke

The Last Supper — Gustave Doré (engraving), public domain
The Last Supper — Gustave Doré (engraving), public domain
This page draws on 9 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Ambrose of Milan, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Augustine of Hippo, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Bede, On the Gospel of Luke; Bede, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Bonaventure, Commentary on Luke, Chapter 22; Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 2034: “Peter's Restoration” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition); Cyril of Alexandria, COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 149; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Luke (lightly modernized text, Grace Gems edition) and John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748).