Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Galatians 3:15

in Galatians 3

Brothers, let me put this in human terms. Even a human covenant, once it is ratified, cannot be canceled or amended.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

Brethren, I speak after the manner of men: Though it be but a man’s covenant, yet when it hath been confirmed, no one maketh it void, or addeth thereto.

KJV

Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man’s covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.

This verse in Galatians 3

Commentary

17 notes on this verse

A commentator

Jerome

Commentary on Galatians · Written before 420.

(V. 15 seqq.) Brothers, I speak in human terms: yet no one rejects or adds to a man's covenant, which has been confirmed. The promises were made to Abraham and to his seed. It does not say, 'and to seeds,' referring to many, but referring to one, 'and to your seed,' who is Christ. Now I say this: the covenant, which was confirmed by God, the law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not invalidate the promise, so as to abolish it.

This site's exposition

Even a human covenant

Paul argues from the lesser to the greater: Even a human covenant, once it is ratified, cannot be canceled or amended. The word diatheke covers both covenant and testament, a settled instrument no codicil can override. If men honor that finality, God's ratified promise to Abraham stands beyond amendment.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers5 voices

A commentator

Oecumenius

Commentary on Galatians · Written before 550.

proposed

Since from the signs given by them, and from the revealing of the Holy Spirit, and from the cross of Christ, and from those things by which Abraham was saved, faith was shown to save, and not the law; now he seeks to persuade them …

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS 23 [1B.3.15-18] · Written before 430.

proposed

The value that a testator's death has for confirming his testament is final, since he cannot then change his mind. This is the value that the immutability of God's promise has in confirming the inheritance of Abraham, whose faith was reckoned for righteousness.

A commentator

Tertullian

Against Marcion Book V · Written before 220.

proposed

"But," says he, "I speak after the manner of men: when we were children, we were placed in bondage under the elements of the world." This, however, was not said "after the manner of men.

A commentator

Tertullian

Against Marcion Book V · Written before 220.

proposed

For (with respect to the latter clause of this passage), what child (in the sense, that is, in which the Gentiles are children) is not in bondage to the elements of the world, which he looks up to in the light of a god? With regard, however, to the former clause, there was a figure (as the apostle wrote it); because after he had said, "I speak after the manner of men," he adds), "Though it be but a man's covenant, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto." For by the figure of the permanency of a human covenant he was defending the divine testament.

A commentator

Jerome

EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS 2.3. SEQ · Written before 420.

proposed

The apostle, who was "made all things to all men" … is also made a fool for the Galatians, whom he a little while before called fools. For he does not employ the arguments that he used with the Romans but simpler ones and such as the stupid could understand.… [He means,] "What I am about to say I say not according to God. I do not speak with regard to the deepest wisdom and those who can eat solid food but with regard to those who feed on milk because of the tenderness of their stomachs."
10 more voices on this verse

The Church Fathers1 voice

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Galatians 3 · Written before 407.

proposed

"To speak after the manner of men" means to use human examples. Having founded his argument on the Scriptures, on the miracles wrought among themselves, on the sufferings of Christ, and on the Patriarch, he proceeds to common usages; and this he does invariably, in order to sweeten his discourse, and render it more acceptable and intelligible to the duller sort. Thus he argues with the Corinthians, "Who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock? Who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not the fruit thereof?" and again with the Hebrews, "For a testament is of force where there hath been death; for doth it ever avail while he that made it liveth?" One may find him dwelling with pleasure on such arguments. In the Old Testament God does the same thing in many instances, as, "Can a woman forget her sucking child?" and again, "Shall the clay say to him that fashioneth it, What makest thou?" and in Hosea, He represents a husband set at nought by his wife. This use of human examples frequently occurs in types also, as when the prophet takes the girdle, and goes down to the potter's house. The meaning of the present example is, that Faith is more ancient than the Law, which is later and only temporary, and delivered in order to pave the way for Faith. Hence he says, "Brethren, I speak after the manner of men;" above he had called them "foolish," now he calls them "brethren," at once chiding and encouraging them. "Though it be but a man's covenant, yet when it hath been confirmed." If a man, says he, makes a covenant, does any one dare to come afterwards and overturn it, or subjoin aught to it? for this is the meaning of "or addeth thereto." Much less then when God makes a covenant; and with whom did God make a covenant?

The Medieval Church2 voices

A commentator

Thomas Aquinas

Commentary on Galatians · Written before 1274.

proposed

Having proved by authority that the Law does not justify and is not necessary for justification, which is through faith, the Apostle then proves the same point with human reasons. Concerning this he does four things: First, he mentions a human custom; Secondly, he touches …

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Galatians · Written before 1107.

proposed

He called them foolish above, but now he calls them brothers—there restraining, and here consoling. I am going to present you, he says, a human example. Paul wants to show that faith is a covenant more ancient than the law, and that it would be …

The Puritans and the Awakening4 voices

A commentator

John Wesley

1703–1791

Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)

I speak after the manner of men - I illustrate this by a familiar instance, taken from the practice of men. Though it be but a man's covenant, yet, if it be once legally confirmed, none - No, not the covenanter himself, unless something unforeseen occur, which cannot be the case with God.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

The original word diatheke signifies both a covenant and a testament. Now the promise made to Abraham was rather a testament than a covenant. When a testament has become of force by the death of the testator, it is not capable of being altered; and therefore, the promise that was given to Abraham being of the nature of a testament, it remains firm and unalterable.
Brethren,....

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

Faith had the precedence of the law, for Abraham was justified by faith. It was a promise that he built upon, and promises are the proper objects of faith.

The Nineteenth Century3 voices

Brethren, I speak after the manner of men - I draw an illustration from what actually occurs among people. The illustration is, that when a contract or agreement is made by people involving obligations and promises, no one can add to it or take from it. It will remain as it was originally made. So with God. He made a solemn promise to Abraham. That promise pertained to his posterity. The blessing was connected with that promise, and it was of the nature of a compact with Abraham.

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

Much less would the righteous God do so. The law is here, by personification, regarded as a second person, distinct from, and subsequent to, the promise of God. The promise is everlasting, and more peculiarly belongs to God.

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

I speak after the manner of men - I am about to produce an example taken from civil transactions. If it be confirmed - If an agreement or bond be signed, sealed, and witnessed, and, in this country, being first duly stamped; No man disannulleth - It stands under the protection of the civil law, and nothing can be legally erased or added.

The words behind it

12 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

  • ἀδελφοί,Brothers,

    adelphoiG80 →343 times

  • κατὰaccording to

    kataG2596 →468 times

  • ἄνθρωπονman

    anthroponG444 →549 times

  • λέγω.I am speaking.

    legoG3004 →1325 times

  • ὅμωςEven

    homosG3676 →

  • ἀνθρώπουof man

    anthropouG444 →549 times

  • κεκυρωμένηνratified

    kekuromenenG2964 →

  • διαθήκηνa covenant

    diathekenG1242 →33 times

  • οὐδεὶςno [one]

    oudeisG3762 →232 times

  • ἀθετεῖsets aside

    atheteiG114 →

  • ἢor

    eG2228 →342 times

  • ἐπιδιατάσσεται.adds thereto.

    epidiatassetaiG1928 →

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    1 Corinthians 15:32

    If I fought wild beasts in Ephesus for human motives, what did I gain? If the dead are not raised, “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.”

    it leads to

    • Isaiah 22:13

      But look, there is joy and gladness, butchering of cattle and slaughtering of sheep, eating of meat and drinking of wine: “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die!”

    • Isaiah 56:12

      “Come, let me get the wine, let us imbibe the strong drink, and tomorrow will be like today, only far better!”

    • Luke 12:19

      Then I will say to myself, “You have plenty of good things laid up for many years. Take it easy. Eat, drink, and be merry!”’

  • Through

    Romans 6:19

    I am speaking in human terms because of the weakness of your flesh. Just as you used to offer the parts of your body in slavery to impurity and to escalating wickedness, so now…

    it leads to

    • Romans 6:13

      Do not present the parts of your body to sin as instruments of wickedness, but present yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life; and present the parts of…

    • 1 Peter 4:2–4

      Consequently, he does not live out his remaining time on earth for human passions, but for the will of God.

    • Colossians 3:5–7

      Put to death, therefore, the components of your earthly nature: sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires, and greed, which is idolatry.

    • Ephesians 2:2–3

      in which you used to walk when you conformed to the ways of this world and of the ruler of the power of the air, the spirit who is now at work in the…

  • Through

    Romans 3:5

    But if our unrighteousness highlights the righteousness of God, what shall we say? That God is unjust to inflict His wrath on us? I am speaking in human terms.

    it leads to

    • Romans 6:19

      I am speaking in human terms because of the weakness of your flesh. Just as you used to offer the parts of your body in slavery to impurity and to escalating wickedness, so now…

Where this verse is studied

About Galatians

Conversion on the Way to Damascus, Caravaggio, about 1600 to 1601. Public domain.
Conversion on the Way to Damascus, Caravaggio, about 1600 to 1601. Public domain.
This page draws on 16 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Augustine of Hippo, EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS 23 [1B.3.15-18]; J. B. Lightfoot, Saint Paul's Epistle to the Galatians; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jerome, Commentary on Galatians; Jerome, EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS 2.3. SEQ; John Chrysostom, Homily on Galatians 3; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Oecumenius, Commentary on Galatians; Tertullian, Against Marcion Book V; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Galatians and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Galatians.