Luke 22:59
in Luke 22About an hour later, another man insisted, “Certainly this man was with Him, for he too is a Galilean.”
BSB
The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾
ASV
And after the space of about one hour another confidently affirmed, saying, Of a truth this man also was with him; for he is a Galilæan.
KJV
And about the space of one hour after another confidently affirmed, saying, Of a truth this fellow also was with him: for he is a Galilean.
⋯
This verse in Luke 22
Commentary
9 notes on this verseThe record, by era
The Church Fathers3 voices
He is also asked a third time; for it follows, And about the space of one hour after, another confidently affirmed, saying, Of a truth this fellow also was with him.
(de Con. Ev. ut sup.) What Matthew and Mark call after a little while, Luke explains by saying, about the space of one hour after; but with regard to the space of time, John says nothing. Likewise when Matthew and Mark record not in the singular but in the plural number those who conversed with Peter, while Luke and John speak of one, we may easily suppose either that Matthew and Mark used the plural for the singular by a common form of speech, or that one person in particular addressed Peter, as being the one who had seen him, and that others trusting to his credit joined in pressing him. But now as to the words which Matthew asserts were said to Peter himself, Truly thou art one of them, for thy speech bewrayeth thee; as also those which to the same Peter John declared to have been said, Did not I see thee in the garden? whereas Mark and Luke state that they spoke to one another concerning Peter; we either believe that they held the right opinion who say that they were really addressed to Peter; (for what was said concerning him in his presence amounts to the same as if it had been said to him;) or that they were said in both ways, and that some of the Evangelists related them one way, some the other.
We do not say that the denial took place in order that Christ's words might come true. We say rather that his object was to forewarn the disciple, inasmuch as what was about to happen did not escape Christ's knowledge. The misfortune, therefore, happened to the disciple from the cowardice of human nature. Since Christ had not risen from the dead, he had not yet abolished death and wiped corruption away. The fear of undergoing death was something beyond human endurance.
The Medieval Church2 voices
And because Peter still did not take heed for himself, he therefore repeated the denial a third time. Whence it is added: And after an interval of about one hour, a certain other man affirmed, saying: Truly this man also was with him, for he …
And after about an hour had passed, another person insisted, saying: Truly this one also was with him, for he is a Galilean. It is not that the Galileans spoke a different language from the people of Jerusalem, who were both Hebrews, but because each …
4 more voices on this verse
The Medieval Church1 voice
But he adds, For he is a Galilæan; not that the Galilæans spoke a different language from the inhabitants of Jerusalem, who indeed were Hebrews, but that each separate province and country having its own peculiarities could not avoid a vernacular tone of speech. It follows, And Peter said, Man, I know not what thou sayest.
The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice
And about the space of one hour after,....
The Nineteenth Century2 voices
A commentator
J.C. Ryle1816–1900
Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Luke (lightly modernized text, Grace Gems edition) (1858)
proposed
The verses we have now read, describe the fall of the apostle Peter. It is a passage which is deeply humbling to the pride of man, but singularly instructive to true Christians. The fall of Peter has been a beacon to the Church, and has probably preserved myriads of souls from destruction. It is a passage which supplies strong proof that the Bible is inspired, and that Christianity is from God.
A commentator
J.C. Ryle1816–1900
Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Luke (lightly modernized text, Grace Gems edition) (1858)
proposed
The verses we have now read, describe the fall of the apostle Peter. It is a passage which is deeply humbling to the pride of man, but singularly instructive to true Christians. The fall of Peter has been a beacon to the Church, and has probably preserved myriads of souls from destruction. It is a passage which supplies strong proof that the Bible is inspired, and that Christianity is from God. If the Christian religion had been the invention of uninspired men — then its first historians would never have told us that one of the chief apostles denied his Master three times. The story of Peter's fall teaches us, firstly — how small and gradual are the steps by which men may go down into great sins. The various steps in Peter's fall, are clearly marked out by the Gospel-writers. They ought always to be observed in reading this part of the apostle's history. The first step was proud self-confidence . Though all denied Christ — yet he never would! He was ready to go with Him both to prison and to death! The second step was indolent neglect of prayer . When his Master told him to pray, lest he should enter into temptation — he gave way to drowsiness, and was found asleep. The third step was vacillating indecision . When the enemies of Christ came upon Him, Peter first fought, then ran away, then turned again, and finally "followed afar off." The fourth step was mingling with bad company . He went into the high priest's house and sat among the servants by the fire, trying to conceal his religion, and hearing and seeing all kinds of evil. The fifth and last step was the natural consequence of the preceding four. He was overwhelmed with fear when suddenly charged with being a disciple. The snare was round his neck. He could not escape. He plunged deeper into error than ever. He denied his blessed Master three times.
The words behind it
20 Greek wordsEvery Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.
| Greek | Sound | Meaning | Word study | In the Bible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| καὶ | kai | And | G2532 → | 9120 times |
| διαστάσης | diastases | when was elapsing | G1339 → | |
| ὡσεὶ | hosei | about | G5616 → | 21 times |
| ὥρας | horas | hour | G5610 → | 106 times |
| μιᾶς | mias | one | G1520 → | 343 times |
| ἄλλος | allos | other | G243 → | 155 times |
| τις | tis | a certain | G5100 → | 528 times |
| διϊσχυρίζετο | diischurizeto | was strongly affirming [it] | G1340 → | |
| λέγων· | legon | saying; | G3004 → | 1325 times |
| ἐπ᾽ | ep᾽ | Of | G1909 → | 883 times |
| ἀληθείας | aletheias | a truth | G225 → | 109 times |
| καὶ | kai | also | G2532 → | 9120 times |
| οὗτος | houtos | this one | G3778 → | 1381 times |
| μετ᾽ | met᾽ | with | G3326 → | 461 times |
| αὐτοῦ | autou | Him | G846 → | 5565 times |
| ἦν· | en | was; | G1510 → | 2333 times |
| καὶ | kai | also | G2532 → | 9120 times |
| γὰρ | gar | for | G1063 → | 1039 times |
| Γαλιλαῖός | galilaios | a Galilean | G1057 → | 11 times |
| ἐστιν. | estin | he is. | G1510 → | 2333 times |
καὶAnd
kaiG2532 →9120 times
διαστάσηςwhen was elapsing
diastasesG1339 →
ὡσεὶabout
hoseiG5616 →21 times
ὥραςhour
horasG5610 →106 times
μιᾶςone
miasG1520 →343 times
ἄλλοςother
allosG243 →155 times
τιςa certain
tisG5100 →528 times
διϊσχυρίζετοwas strongly affirming [it]
diischurizetoG1340 →
λέγων·saying;
legonG3004 →1325 times
ἐπ᾽Of
ep᾽G1909 →883 times
ἀληθείαςa truth
aletheiasG225 →109 times
καὶalso
kaiG2532 →9120 times
οὗτοςthis one
houtosG3778 →1381 times
μετ᾽with
met᾽G3326 →461 times
αὐτοῦHim
autouG846 →5565 times
ἦν·was;
enG1510 →2333 times
καὶalso
kaiG2532 →9120 times
γὰρfor
garG1063 →1039 times
Γαλιλαῖόςa Galilean
galilaiosG1057 →11 times
ἐστιν.he is.
estinG1510 →2333 times
A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.
Where this verse is studied
On this page
Studies18
On this chapter
About Luke

This page draws on Ambrose of Milan, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Augustine of Hippo, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Bede, On the Gospel of Luke; Bede, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Bonaventure, Commentary on Luke, Chapter 22; Cyril of Alexandria, COMMENTARY ON LUKE, HOMILY 149; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Luke (lightly modernized text, Grace Gems edition) and John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748).
