Judgeschapter 11
40 verses · BSBJudges book hub →
Jephthah's Daughter Comes to Meet Her Father, Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain
Key verse
Jephthah made this vow to the LORD: “If indeed You will deliver the Ammonites into my hand,
It stands in scene C of the chapter, verses 29 to 40.
The chapter
Chapter summary
Jephthah the Gileadite, a mighty man of valor and the son of a harlot, is driven out by his brothers and gathers vain fellows in the land of Tob, until Gilead's elders need him and make him head and chief, the compact sworn before Jehovah at Mizpah. He first tries diplomacy, sending the Ammonite king a careful history of the Exodus route and three hundred years of undisputed possession, closing past all argument: 'Jehovah, the Judge, be judge this day.' Then the Spirit comes upon him, and with it the vow, whatsoever cometh forth of the doors of his house to meet him. His daughter comes out with timbrels and dances, his only child.
Context
History · Samuel · Judges overview
Where the chapter sits
Judges 11 falls in The twelve judges (chapters 3–16). Othniel, Ehud, Shamgar, Deborah, Gideon, Tola, Jair, Jephthah, Ibzan, Elon, Abdon, Samson (and Abimelech as anti-judge). Seven oppression-deliverance cycles.
Jephthah's vow. The Ammonite deliverance; the rash vow; the daughter who went to bewail her virginity.
Before it: Incomplete conquest; programmatic cycle, chapters 1–2. After it: Appendix: diagnosis of Israel, chapters 17–21.
The whole shape of Judges→The world behind this chapter
Judges 11The history
Jephthah is driven out because his mother was a prostitute and his half-brothers want the inheritance undivided. Ancient Near Eastern law codes deal with exactly this situation, the status of sons by concubines, slaves, and outsiders, and the outcome varied by custom. Cast out, he goes to Tob on the frontier and gathers what the text calls worthless men, meaning landless men with nothing to lose. That is how a private war-band formed, and it was the normal career path for a disinherited son with a talent for fighting.
The rest of the history, and what it meant to them
His message to the Ammonite king is a legal brief, not a taunt. He walks through three hundred years of history, Israel asked Edom and Moab for passage and was refused, went around, took land from Sihon the Amorite rather than from Ammon, and has held it ever since. That figure of three hundred years, counted from the conquest to Jephthah, is one of the anchors for the early date of the exodus, since it does not fit a conquest in the thirteenth century.
He also argues in the terms his opponent would accept: will you not possess what Chemosh your god gives you? He is not endorsing Chemosh; he is saying that by the enemy's own reasoning, territory long held under a nation's god is not up for renegotiation after three centuries of silence.
The vow is the chapter's wound. Vows in Israel were binding and voluntary, and the Law made specific provision for redeeming a person dedicated by vow through a payment to the sanctuary, a provision Jephthah, out on the frontier, apparently never considered. Readers have divided ever since between those who take the fulfillment as a literal human sacrifice, which the Law flatly forbids, and those who read the daughter's two months mourning her virginity, and the note that she never knew a man, as meaning she was given to lifelong sanctuary service without marriage. The text states what he did and refuses to comment.
What it meant to them
The first hearers watched an outcast be begged back by the very elders who let him be thrown out, and negotiate hard terms before he came. It is the book's clearest picture of how desperate Israel had become.
And the vow taught a lesson those hearers could not miss. He was already clothed with the Spirit before he opened his mouth; the bargain added nothing but a bill. Rash words spoken to God cost more than they buy.
Sources cited
- Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Its Life and Institutions
- K. A. Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament
A. The outcast son called back to lead
1. (vv. 1-3)
a.Gilead is both the man and the country, so the name in verse 1 does two jobs at once. The brothers expel him over inheritance rather than over conduct, since where a legitimate wife had sons the son of a strange woman had no claim on the estate. The vain men who gather to him in Tob are described with the same word used of the company Abimelech hired at 9:4, and they are the same kind of following David draws at Adullam in 1 Samuel 22:2, so Israel's next deliverer is running a band outside the land before anyone sends for him.
Judges 11:1, 1 voiceWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
Judges 11:1
“The history of Jephthah appears to be an independent history inserted by the compiler of the Book of Judges. Jdg 11:4-5 introduce the Ammonite war without any apparent reference to Jdg 10:17-18. A genealogy of Manasseh 1Ch 7:14-17 gives the families which sprang from Gilead, and among them mention is made of an “Aramitess” concubine as the mother of one family.”
Judges 11:2, 1 voice
Judges 11:2
“Thou shalt not inherit in our father's house--As there were children by the legitimate wife, the son of the secondary one was not entitled to any share of the patrimony, and the prior claim of the others was indisputable.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Judges 11:3, 1 voice
Judges 11:3
“The land of Tob - To the north of Gilead, toward Damascus. The readiness with which Jephthah took to the freebooter’s life gives us a lively picture of the unsettled times in which he lived.”
2. (vv. 4-6)
a.Chapter 10 closed with the princes of Gilead asking what man would begin the fight against the children of Ammon, and the man turns out to be the one they had driven out. The elders travel to Tob to fetch him, so Israel's leaders stand outside the land asking a favour of an exile. What they name first is captain, which is command over one campaign and ends when the campaign does.
Judges 11:4, 1 voice
Judges 11:4
“Probably this was the same invasion with that mentioned, ch. x. 17 , when the children of Ammon were gathered together and encamped in or against Gilead. And those words, in process of time, refer to what goes immediately before of the expulsion of Jephthah; many days after he had been thus thrust out in disgrace was he fetched back again with honour.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Judges 11:5, 1 voice
Judges 11:5
“And it was so, that when the children of Ammon made war against Israel,.... Were preparing for it, and had assembled their forces near them, and had began to make some efforts against them: the elders of Gilead went to fetch Jephthah out of the land of Tob; they did not send messengers to him, but went themselves, partly to show greater respect to him, and partly in hopes of better success, being aware of objections he would make, which they could better answer themselves than a deputation.”
3. (vv. 7-8)
a.Verse 2 lays the expulsion on his brothers and verse 7 lays it on the elders of Gilead, who answer without denying it. The offer rises from captain in verse 6 to head over all the inhabitants of Gilead in verse 8, and that exact title was already posted at 10:18 by the princes of Gilead to whatever man would begin the fight. The elders are holding to terms the previous chapter had set before they knew who would claim them.
Judges 11:7, 2 voices
Judges 11:7
“It is probable that he saw some of his brothers among the deputies. Jephthah was now in circumstances to make his own terms. With his former experience, he would have shown little wisdom or prudence without binding them to a clear and specific engagement to invest him with unlimited authority, the more especially as he was about to imperil his life in their cause.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Judges 11:7
“They had thrust God out by their idolatries, yet in their distress begged his help; he told them how justly he might have rejected them, and yet graciously delivered them. Many slight God and good men till they come to be in distress, and then they are desirous of God's mercy and good men's prayers.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
4. (vv. 9-11)
a.He will not move on a promise and makes them swear it, and the elders answer with the LORD be witness between us. The place is Mizpeh in Gilead, and Genesis 31:49 gives that same country the name Mizpah for the same reason, the LORD watch between me and thee when we are absent one from another. Verse 11 adds that he uttered all his words before the LORD in Mizpeh, so a bargain struck with men is repeated as a matter between him and God, which is the shape the vow at verse 30 will take.
Judges 11:9, 1 voice
Judges 11:9
“Jephthah made his own aggrandisement the condition of his delivering; his country. The circumstances of his birth and long residence in a pagan land were little favorable to the formation of the highest type of character. Yet he has his record among the faithful Heb 11:32.”
Judges 11:11, 2 voices
Judges 11:11
“Jephthah uttered all his words before the Lord in Mizpeh - This phrase designates the presence of the tabernacle, or the ark, or of the high priest with Urim and Thummim Jdg 20:26; Jdg 21:2; Jos 18:8; 1Sa 21:7. The high priest waited upon Jephthah with the ephod, and possibly the ark, at his own house (see Jdg 20:18 here). A trace of Jephthah’s claim to unite all Israel under his dominion is found in Jdg 12:2, and breathes through his whole message to the king of the Ammonites. See Jdg 11:12, Jdg 11:15, Jdg 11:23, Jdg 11:27.”
Judges 11:11
“Before the Lord - That is, before the public congregation, wherewith God was usually, and then especially present. Messengers - That is, ambassadors, to prevent blood-shed, that so the Israelites might be acquitted before God and men, from all the sad consequences of this war; herein he shewed great prudence, and no less piety.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
B. Jephthah's case against Ammon, three centuries old
1. (vv. 12-13)
a.He sends before he strikes, which is the order Deuteronomy 20:10 lays down for a city offered peace. The king's claim is that Israel took away his land from Arnon even unto Jabbok when they came up out of Egypt, and that stretch is the kingdom of Sihon the Amorite in Numbers 21:24 rather than Ammonite ground. The same verse of Numbers says the border of the children of Ammon was strong, and Deuteronomy 2:19 had forbidden Israel to distress Ammon at all, so the two nations had never fought over it.
Judges 11:12, 1 voice
Judges 11:12
“The bravest officers have always been averse to war; so Jephthah, whose courage was indisputable, resolved not only to make it clearly appear that hostilities were forced upon him, but to try measures for avoiding, if possible, an appeal to arms: and in pursuing such a course he was acting as became a leader in Israel (De 20:10-18).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Judges 11:13, 1 voice
Judges 11:13
“From Arnon even unto Jabbok ... - The land bounded by the Arnon on the south, by the Jabbok on the north, by the Jordan on the west, and by the wilderness on the east was, of old, the kingdom of Sihon, but then the territory of Reuben and Gad.”
2. (vv. 14-15)
a.What follows is the longest speech in the book of Judges, and it is built as a legal answer rather than as a threat. The thesis comes first, that Israel took not away the land of Moab nor the land of the children of Ammon, so the whole case turns on whose land it was at the moment Israel took it. Verses 16 to 22 are the evidence for that one sentence, and the evidence is history drawn out of Numbers 20 and 21.
Judges 11:15, 2 voices
Judges 11:15
“And said unto him,.... By his messengers: thus saith Jephthah; in a majestic style, as governor of Israel: Israel took not away the land of Moab, nor the land of the children of Ammon; they were charged not to take any, nor did they take any that belonged to any of these countries, or that was then in the possession of either of them, Deu 2:9 what they did take was in the hands of Sihon and Og, and they had obtained it by conquest, and so no more belonging to either of these.”
Judges 11:15
“Consult the marginal references. If the ark with the copy of the Law Deu 31:26 was at Mizpeh, it would account for Jephthah’s accurate knowledge of it; and this exact agreement of his message with Numbers and Deuteronomy would give additional force to the expression, “he uttered all his words before the Lord” Jdg 11:11. Jdg 11:17 No mention is made of this embassy to Moab in the Pentateuch. Jdg 11:19 Into my place - This expression implies that the trans-Jordanic possessions of Israel were not included in the land of Canaan properly speaking.”
3. (vv. 16-18)
a.The route is Numbers 20:14-21 and Numbers 21:4-13: Kadesh, the refusal at Edom, the long compass around Edom and Moab, and camp beyond Arnon without crossing into Moab. Jephthah reports an embassy to the king of Moab which Numbers records only for Edom, and both accounts stand as they are written rather than one correcting the other. Arnon as the border of Moab is the fact the argument needs, because it means the ground north of the river was not Moabite when Israel arrived at it.
4. (vv. 19-22)
a.These four verses follow Numbers 21:21-25 closely, down to the request to pass through, Sihon's refusal, the battle at Jahaz, and the possession running from Arnon to Jabbok. The argument is that the land came out of Amorite hands in a war Sihon began, so Ammon is asking back ground it never held. Deuteronomy 2:24-36 tells the same campaign a third time, and the three accounts agree on the place, the aggressor and the outcome.
5. (vv. 23-24)
a.The god named in verse 24 is Chemosh, and Chemosh belongs to Moab in Numbers 21:29 and 1 Kings 11:7, while Ammon's god is Milcom in 1 Kings 11:5. Readers take the difficulty three ways: that Jephthah argues from the king's own premise without granting it, that Moab and Ammon shared cults along that border, or that the disputed strip had been Moabite before Sihon took it from Moab. Whether the sentence concedes anything real to Chemosh is argued as well, and commentators differ over how much of Israel's theology a Gileadite captain carried. The text reports his words and passes no judgment on them.
Judges 11:23, 1 voice
Judges 11:23
“The Lord God of Israel hath dispossessed the Amorites - Jephthah shows that the Israelites did not take the land of the Moabites or Ammonites, but that of the Amorites, which they had conquered from Sihon their king, who had, without cause or provocation, attacked them; and although the Amorites had taken the lands in question from the Ammonites, yet the title by which Israel held them was good, because they took them not from the Ammonites, but conquered them from the Amorites.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Judges 11:24, 2 voices
Judges 11:24
“Wilt not thou possess that which Chemosh thy god giveth thee to possess?.... Chemosh was the idol of the Moabites, see Num 21:29, which has led some to think, that the present king of Ammon was also king of Moab, and who insisted on that part of the country, which formerly belonged to Moab, to be delivered to him, as well as that which had belonged to Ammon.”
Judges 11:24
“Wilt not thou possess that which Chemosh thy god giveth thee - As if he had said: “It is a maxim with you, as it is among all nations, that the lands which they conceive to be given them by their gods, they have an absolute right to, and should not relinquish them to any kind of claimant. You suppose that the land which you possess was given you by your god Chemosh and therefore you will not relinquish what you believe you hold by a Divine right.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
6. (vv. 25-26)
a.Balak hired Balaam and never once brought an army against Israel, which is Numbers 22 to 24, so Moab's own king made no claim by arms on ground Ammon now wants. The three hundred years of verse 26 is the largest chronological figure in Judges and it is read in more than one way: as a round number for a long occupation, as the sum of the servitudes and deliverances recorded to this point in the book, or as a figure to be fitted against the four hundred and eighty years of 1 Kings 6:1. The point Jephthah draws from it does not depend on the number being exact, since a claim left unpressed for centuries is what he is describing.
Judges 11:25, 1 voice
Judges 11:25
“And now art thou anything better than Balak the son of Zippor king of Moab?.... This argument seems to strengthen the conjecture, that this king was king of Moab at this time, and so Balak was one of his predecessors.”
Judges 11:26, 1 voice
Judges 11:26
“So that, supposing their title had not been clear at the first (which yet he had proved it was), yet, no claim having been made for so many generations, the entry of the children of Ammon, without doubt, was barred for ever.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
7. (vv. 27-28)
a.The speech ends by handing the case over, the LORD the Judge be judge this day, and the title he gives God is the book's own word for its heroes. Genesis 18:25 puts the same question to the same office, shall not the Judge of all the earth do right. Verse 28 records no reply of any kind, so the longest argument in Judges is met with silence and the war goes forward.
Judges 11:27, 1 voice
Judges 11:27
“With this solemn reference of the matter to the Judge of heaven and earth he designs either to deter the Ammonites from proceeding and oblige them to retire, when they saw the right of the cause was against them, or to justify himself in subduing them if they should go on. Note, War is an appeal to heaven, to God the Judge of all, to whom the issues of it belong.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
C. The vow, and whatever comes out of the doors
1. (vv. 29-31)
a.Spirit of the LORD came upon: The Spirit of the LORD comes on Jephthah, the third of seven times in this book after Othniel at 3:10 and Gideon at 6:34, and the remaining four all fall on Samson at 13:25, 14:6, 14:19 and 15:14. The vow is made after the Spirit has come, and the text records no command for it, no priest consulted and no answer given. Verse 31 turns on two words: the Hebrew behind whatsoever can be rendered whosoever, and the connective before the last clause is read as and by some and as or by others, which would give shall surely be the LORD's, or I will offer it up for a burnt offering. Both renderings are old and the grammar carries either.
Judges 11:29, 1 voice
Judges 11:29
“Then the Spirit of the Lord ... - This was the sanctification of Jephthah for his office of Judge and savior of God’s people Israel. Compare Jdg 6:34; Jdg 13:25. The declaration is one of the distinctive marks which stamp this history as a divine history.”
Judges 11:30, 3 voices
Judges 11:30
“And whereas he [Jovinianus] prefers the fidelity of the father Jephthah to the tears of the virgin daughter, that corroborates our point. For we are not commending virgins of the world so much as those who are virgins for Christ's sake.”
Jerome· written before 420· Against Jovinianus 1.23patristic
Judges 11:30
“Returning to the camp at Mizpeh, he then began his march against the enemy. There he made his celebrated vow, in accordance with an ancient custom for generals at the outbreak of a war, or on the eve of a battle, to promise the god of their worship a costly oblation, or dedication of some valuable booty, in the event of victory.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Judges 11:30
“The matter of such a singular vow ( Lev. xxvii. 2 ) must be something that has a plain and direct tendency either to the advancement of God's glory, and the interests of his kingdom among men, or to the furtherance of ourselves in his service, and in that which is antecedently our duty.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Judges 11:31, 1 voice
Judges 11:31
“The words of this verse prove conclusively that Jephthah intended his vow to apply to human beings, not animals: for only one of his household could be expected to come forth from the door of his house to meet him. They also preclude any other meaning than that Jephthah contemplated a human sacrifice. This need not, however, surprise us, when we recollect his Syrian birth and long residence in a Syrian city, where such fierce rites were probably common.”
2. (vv. 32-33)
a.The war gets two verses and the vow gets eight, which is the chapter's own weighting of what happened. Aroer stands on the Arnon and Minnith lies inland, so the twenty cities fall across the very strip the speech had just argued about. Ammon is subdued and the narrative turns straight back to Mizpeh, where the words of verse 30 were spoken.
Judges 11:32, 1 voice
Judges 11:32
“Jephthah passed over unto the children of Ammon . . . and the Lord delivered them into his hands--He met and engaged them at Aroer, a town in the tribe of Gad, upon the Arnon. A decisive victory crowned the arms of Israel, and the pursuit was continued to Abel (plain of the vineyards), from south to north, over an extent of about sixty miles.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Judges 11:33, 2 voices
Judges 11:33
“And he smote them from Aroer,.... A city which lay near the river Arnon, on the borders of Moab, Deu 3:12. even till thou come to Minnith; which seems to have been a place famous for wheat, Eze 27:17 so David de Pomis (a) says it was a place where the best wheat grew. Jerom says (b) in his time was shown a village called Mannith, four miles from Esbus (or Heshbon), as you go to Philadelphia.”
Judges 11:33
“As in the conflicts with the Moabites, Canaanites, and Midianites Judg. 3; 4; 7, the battle was on Israelite territory, in self-defense, not in aggressive warfare. The plain of the vineyards - Rather, “Abel-Ceramim” (compare Abel-Meholah), identified with an “Abel” situated among vineyards, 7 miles from Robbah. “Minnith” is “Maanith,” 4 miles from Heshbon, on the road to Rab-bah.”
3. (v. 34)
a.Timbrels and dances is how Miriam meets the Red Sea deliverance in Exodus 15:20 and how the women of the cities meet Saul and David in 1 Samuel 18:6, so she is doing the ordinary thing a victory called for. The house she comes out of is the house of the vow, and the doors are the doors of verse 31. The last clause is set where it does the most work: she was his only child, and beside her he had neither son nor daughter, so the line of the man thrust out of his father's house ends with her.
Judges 11:34, 1 voice
Judges 11:34
“With timbrels and with dances - From this instance we find it was an ancient custom for women to go out to meet returning conquerors with musical instruments, songs, and dances; and that it was continued afterwards is evident from the instance given 1Sa 18:6, where David was met, on his return from the defeat of Goliath and the Philistines, by women from all the cities of Israel, with singing and dancing, and various instruments of music.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
4. (vv. 35-36)
a.He rends his clothes and says he cannot go back, and the law he stands on is Numbers 30:2 with Deuteronomy 23:21-23, which bind a man to what has gone out of his lips. What the chapter never mentions is Leviticus 27:1-8, where a person vowed to the LORD is redeemed by a valuation paid to the priest, thirty shekels for a woman of her years. Her own answer asks for no release either, and the reason she gives is the victory: the LORD hath taken vengeance for thee of thine enemies.
Judges 11:35, 3 voices
Judges 11:35
“Jephthah was right in not being deterred from keeping his vow by the loss and sorrow to himself (compare the marginal references), just as Abraham was right in not withholding his son, his only son, from God, when commanded to offer him up as a burnt-offering. But Jephthah was wholly wrong in that conception of the character of God which led to his making the rash vow. And he would have done right not to slay his child, though the guilt of making and of breaking such a vow would have remained.”
Judges 11:35
“IN Jephtha case there were good reasons for going back. He had made a rash vow and such things are much better broken than kept. If a man makes a vow to commit a crime, his vow to do so is, in itself, a sin. The carrying out of his vow will be doubly sinful.”
Judges 11:35
“Trouble me - Before this, I was troubled by my brethren; and since, by the Ammonites; and now most of all, tho' but occasionally, by thee. Opened my mouth - That is, I have vowed. Cannot go back - That is, not retract my vow;”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Judges 11:36, 1 voice
Judges 11:36
“And she said unto him - What a pattern of filial piety and obedience! She was at once obedient, pious, and patriotic. A woman to have no offspring was considered to be in a state of the utmost degradation among the Hebrews; but she is regardless of all this, seeing her father is in safety, and her country delivered.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
5. (vv. 37-38)
a.She asks two months, and what she goes up to bewail is her virginity rather than her life, which is the hinge of the whole dispute over what happened to her. Readers who take the vow as discharged in death answer that a woman dying childless in Israel lost her name as well as her life, so the mourning fits either outcome. The mountains and the fellows are given without a place name, and the text supplies no reason for the two months.
Judges 11:37, 2 voices
Judges 11:37
“Mountains - Which she chose as a solitary place, and therefore fittest for lamentation. Bewail - That I shall die childless, which was esteemed both a curse and a disgrace for the Israelites, because such were excluded from that great privilege of increasing the holy seed, and contributing to the birth of the Messiah.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Judges 11:37
“Besides, had she only been confined to a single life, she needed not to have desired these two months to bewail it in: she had her whole life before her to do that, if she saw cause. Nor needed she to take such a sad leave of her companions; for those that are of that opinion understand what is said in”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
6. (vv. 39-40)
a.Two readings of this verse are ancient and both are held by serious men. Josephus in Antiquities of the Jews 5.7.10 and Keil and Delitzsch in their commentary on Judges read an actual burnt offering, while John Gill and Adam Clarke argue she was devoted to perpetual virginity, taking the clause that she knew no man as the outcome the verse stops to record and reading the yearly gathering of verse 40 as rehearsing her rather than mourning a death. What the text does not carry is a priest, an altar, an approval, or any word from God about the vow, and Leviticus 18:21 with Deuteronomy 12:31 forbid human sacrifice outright. Hebrews 11:32 names Jephthah among the faithful and says nothing of the vow, so the question is left standing where Scripture leaves it.
Judges 11:39, 2 voices
Judges 11:39
“It is also sometimes contrary to duty to fulfill a promise or to keep an oath. As was the case with Herod, who swore that whatever was asked he would give to the daughter of Herodias, and so allowed the death of John, that he might not break his word. And what shall I say of Jephthah, who offered up his daughter in sacrifice, she having been the first to meet him as he returned home victorious; whereby he fulfilled the vow which he had made that he would offer to God whatever should meet him first.”
Ambrose of Milan· written before 397· On the Duties of the Clergy 1.50.255patristic
Judges 11:39
“It is probably conceived, that the Greeks, who used to steal sacred histories, and turn them into fables, had from this history their relation of Iphigenia (which may be put for Jephtigenia) sacrificed by her father Agamemnon, which is described by many of the same circumstances wherewith this is accompanied.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Judges 11:40, 3 voices
Judges 11:40
“That the daughters of Israel went yearly to lament the daughter of Jephthah the Gileadite,.... Either the death of her, as some, or her virginity, as others; though the word (p) used may signify to talk and discourse with her, to hold a confabulation with her, and comfort her, as Kimchi and Ben Melech interpret it; to bring her some news, and tell her some diverting stories, to cheer and refresh her in her solitude.”
Judges 11:40
“To lament the daughter of Jephthah - I am satisfied that this is not a correct translation of the original לתנות לבת יפתח lethannoth lebath yiphtach. Houbigant translates the whole verse thus: Sed iste mos apud Israel invaluit, ut virgines Israel, temporibus diversis, irent ad filiam Jepthe-ut eam quotannis dies quatuor consolarentur; “But this custom prevailed in Israel that the virgins of Israel went at different times, four days in the year, to the daughter of Jephthah, that they might comfort her.” This verse also gives evidence that the daughter of Jephthah was not sacrificed: nor does it appear that the custom or statute referred to here lasted after the death of Jephthah’s daughter.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Judges 11:40
“But, says Mr. Henry, "We do not find any law, usage or custom, in all the Old Testament, which doth in the least intimate, that a single life was any branch or article of religion." And do we find any law, usage or custom there, which doth in the least intimate, that cutting the throat of an only child, was any branch or article of religion?”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The text of this chapter
This page carries no textual note on Judges 11. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →
This page draws on 10 works. Open for the list.
This page draws on Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes; Ambrose of Milan, On the Duties of the Clergy 1.50.255; Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 1341: “Retreat Impossible” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition) (1877); Jamieson, Fausset & Brown; Jerome, Against Jovinianus 1.23; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765); Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth and Matthew Henry.
Keep studying
On this page
Studies1

