Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Matthew 5:37

in Matthew 5

Simply let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No.’ Anything more comes from the evil one.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

But let your speech be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: and whatsoever is more than these is of the evil one.

KJV

But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.

This verse in Matthew 5

Commentary

19 notes on this verse

A commentator

Jerome

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 420.

(Verse 37) Let your word be 'Yes, yes' or 'No, no'; anything more than this comes from evil. However, evangelical truth does not require an oath, since every faithful statement is considered as if made under oath.

This site's exposition

Do not break your oath

on Matthew 5:33-37

The fourth antithesis answers a system that ranked oaths by heaven, earth, Jerusalem or one's own head below oaths by God's name, though each touches God: "His footstool," "the city of the great King." Jesus calls for speech so truthful that no oath is needed: "let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No.’" Some read this as forbidding every oath, others as aimed at the evasive oaths of the day, since Jesus answers under oath at 26:63-64.

This site's exposition

Anything more comes from the evil one

The closing words can be read as coming from evil or from the evil one, and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown grant that both renderings are correct. The Berean text takes the second. Augustine counts an oath among things necessary, never among things good, so a believer uses one only when hearers will not otherwise believe what is for their good.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers5 voices

A commentator

Tertullian

The Prescription Against Heretics · Written before 220.

proposed

Moreover, they remembered the words): "Let your communication be yea, yea; nay, nay; for whatsoever is more than this cometh of evil; " so that they were not to handle the gospel in a diversity of treatment.

A commentator

Tertullian

On the Flesh of Christ · Written before 220.

proposed

But with us there is no equivocation, nothing twisted into a double sense. Light is light; and darkness, darkness; yea is yea; and nay, nay; "whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." She who bare (really) bare; and although she was a virgin when she conceived, she was a wife when she brought forth her son.

A commentator

Tertullian

Against Praxeas · Written before 220.

proposed

Besides, does not the very fact that they have the distinct names of Father and Son amount to a declaration that they are distinct in personality? For, of course, all things will be what their names represent them to be; and what they are and ever will be, that will they be called; and the distinction indicated by the names does not at all admit of any confusion, because there is none in the things which they designate. "Yes is yes, and no is no; for what is more than these, cometh of evil."

A commentator

Jerome

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 420.

proposed

Therefore Evangelic verity does not admit an oath, since the whole discourse of the faithful is instead of an oath.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 8 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

Wherefore, with a loud and clear voice, I proclaim to all and testify, that those who are notorious for this transgression, who utter words which come "of the evil one," (for such is swearing,) shall not step over the threshold of the Church. Let this present month be the time allowed you for reforming in this matter. Talk not to me, "Necessity of business compels me to use oaths, else people do not believe me." To begin with this, retrench those oaths which come merely of habit.
11 more voices on this verse

The Church Fathers3 voices

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 17 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

"But what," it may be said, "if any one should require an oath, and apply constraint?" Let the fear of God be more powerful than the constraint: since, if thou art to bring forward such excuses, thou wilt keep none of the things which are enjoined. Yea, for first with respect to thy wife thou wilt say, "what if she be contentious and extravagant;" and then as to the right eye, "what if I love it, and am quite on fire?" and of the unchaste look, "what then, if I cannot help seeing?" and of our anger against a brother, "what if I be hasty, and not able to govern my tongue?" and in general, all His sayings thou mayest on this wise trample under foot. Yet surely with regard to human laws thou darest not in any case use this allegation, nor say, "what then if this or that be the case," but, willing or unwilling, thou receivest what is written. And besides, thou wilt never have compulsion to undergo at all. For he that hath hearkened unto those former blessings, and hath framed himself to be such as Christ enjoined, will have no such constraint to endure from any, being held in reverence and veneration by all. "But let your yea, be yea; and your nay, nay: for that which exceedeth these cometh of the evil one." What is it then that "exceeds yea" and "nay"? it is the oath, not the perjury. For this latter is quite acknowledged, and no man needs to learn that it is of the evil one; and it is not an excess, but an opposite: whereas an excess means something more, and added over and above: which kind of thing swearing is. "What then," saith one, "was it of the evil one? and if it was of the evil one, how was it a law?" Well, this same thing thou wilt say concerning the wife also; how is that now accounted adultery, which was before permitted? What now may one reply to this? […]

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

(ubi sup.) And he who has learned that an oath is to be reckoned not among things good, but among things necessary, will restrain himself as much as he may, not to use an oath without necessity, unless he sees men loth to believe what it is for their good they should believe, without the confirmation of an oath. This then is good and to be desired, that our conversation be only, yea, yea; nay, nay; for what is more than this cometh of evil. That is, if you are compelled to swear, you know that it is by the necessity of their weakness to whom you would persuade any thing; which weakness is surely an evil. What is more than this is thus evil; not that you do evil in this just use of an oath to persuade another to something beneficial for him; but it is an evil in him whose weakness thus obliges you to use an oath.

A commentator

Hilary of Poitiers

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 367.

proposed

Otherwise; They who live in the simplicity of the faith have not need to swear, with them ever, what is is, what is not is not; by this their life and their conversation are ever preserved in truth.

The Medieval Church2 voices

A commentator

Rabanus Maurus

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 856.

proposed

Having forbidden swearing, He instructs us how we ought to speak, Let your speech be yea, yea; nay, nay. That is, to affirm any thing it is sufficient to say, 'It is so:' to deny, to say, 'It is not so.' Or, yea, yea; nay, nay, are therefore twice repeated, that what you affirm with the mouth you should prove in deed, and what you deny in word, you should not establish by your conduct.

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 1107.

proposed

But let your speech be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay. Lest you ask, "How then will people believe what I say?" He says, "They will believe you if you always tell the truth and never swear at all." For no one is disbelieved more than he …

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

But let your communication be yea, yea,.... That is, let your speech, in your common conversation, and daily business of life, when ye answer to anything in the affirmative, be "yea"; and when ye answer to anything in the negative, "nay": and for the stronger asseveration of the matter, when it is necessary, double these words; but let no oaths be joined unto them: this is enough; a righteous man's yea, is yea, and his no, is no; his word is sufficient.

The Nineteenth Century5 voices

But let your communication - Your word; what you say. Be, Yea - Yes. This does not mean that we should always use the word “yea,” for it might as well have been translated “yes”; but it means that we should simply affirm or declare that a thing is so. More than these - More than these affirmations. Cometh of evil - Is evil. Proceeds from some evil disposition or purpose. And from this we may learn: 1. That profane swearing is always the evidence of a depraved heart.

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

proposed

2Co 1:17, 18). for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil--not "of the evil one"; though an equally correct rendering of the words, and one which some expositors prefer. It is true that all evil in our world is originally of the devil, that it forms a kingdom at the head of which he sits, and that, in every manifestation of it he has an active part.

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — unbalanced-parens

A commentator

J.C. Ryle

1816–1900

Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew (1856)

proposed

These verses deserve the closest attention of all readers of the Bible. A right understanding of the doctrines they contain lies at the very root of Christianity. The Lord Jesus here explains more fully the meaning of his words, “I came not to destroy the law but to fulfil.”

A commentator

J.C. Ryle

1816–1900

Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew (1856)

proposed

These verses deserve the closest attention of all readers of the Bible. A right understanding of the doctrines they contain lies at the very root of Christianity. The Lord Jesus here explains more fully the meaning of his words, “I came not to destroy the law but to fulfil.”He teaches us that his Gospel magnifies the Law, and exalts its authority: he shows us that the Law, as expounded by him, was a far more spiritual and heart-searching rule than most of the Jews supposed; and he proves this by selecting three commandments out of the ten as examples of what he means. He expounds the sixth commandment. Many thought that they kept this part of God’s law so long as they did not commit actual murder. The Lord Jesus shows that its requirements go much further than this. It condemns all angry and passionate language, and especially when used without a cause. Let us mark this well. We may be perfectly innocent of taking life, and yet be guilty of breaking the sixth commandment! He expounds the seventh commandment. Many supposed that they kept this part of God’s law if they did not actually commit adultery. The Lord Jesus teaches that we may break it in our thoughts, hearts and imaginations, even when our outward conduct is moral and correct. The God with whom we have to do looks far beyond actions. With him even a glance of the eye may be a sin! He expounds the third commandment. Many fancied that they kept this part of God’s law so long as they did not swear falsely, and performed their oaths. The Lord Jesus forbids all vain and light swearing altogether. All swearing by created things, even when God’s name is not brought forward—all calling upon God to witness, excepting on the most solemn occasions—is a great sin. Now all this is very instructive. It ought to raise very serious reflections in our minds: it calls us loudly to use great searching of heart.

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

Let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay - That is, a positive affirmation, or negation, according to your knowledge of the matter concerning which you are called to testify. Do not equivocate; mean what you assert, and adhere to your assertion. Hear what a heathen says on this subject: - Εχθρος γαρ μοι κεινος ὁμως αιδαο πυλησιν, Ος χ’ετερον μεν κευθει ενι φρεσιν, αλλο δε βαζει. Hom. Il. ix. 312 “He whose words agree not with his private thoughts is as detestable to me as the gates of hell.” See on Joshua 2 (note) at the end. See the subject of swearing particularly considered in the note at the conclusion of Deuteronomy 6 (note). Whatsoever is more than these - That is, more than a bare affirmation or negation, according to the requirements of Eternal Truth, cometh of evil; or, is of the wicked one - εκ του πονηρου εϚιν, i.e. the devil, the father of superfluities and lies. One of Selden’s MSS. and Gregory Nyssen, a commentator of the fourth century, have εκ του διαβολου εϚιν, is of the devil. That the Jews were notoriously guilty of common swearing, for which our Lord particularly reprehends them, and warns his disciples against, and that they swore by heaven, by earth, by Jerusalem, by their head, etc., the following extracts, made by Dr. Lightfoot from their own writings, amply testify: - “It was customary and usual among them to swear by the creatures. ‘If any swear by heaven, by earth, by the sun, etc., although the mind of the swearer be, under these words, to swear by Him who created them, yet this is not an oath. Or, if any swear by some of the prophets, or by some of the books of the Scripture, although the sense of the swearer be to swear by Him that sent that prophet, or that gave that book, nevertheless, this is not an oath. Maimonides.’ “If any adjure another by heaven or earth, he is not guilty. […]

How the passage was read

On Matthew 5:33-37

On Matthew 5:33-37

The oath culture behind “let your yes be yes”

To avoid uttering God's name, oaths in Jesus' day were commonly sworn by substitutes: by heaven, by earth, by Jerusalem, by one's own head. Around the substitutes grew a case law of which formulas actually bind. The Mishnah's oath tractate preserves exactly this reasoning: an oath administered “in the name of heaven and in the name of earth” leaves the swearer exempt, because that is not an oath in God's name (Shevuot 4:13). The practical effect was a graded honesty in which some sworn words could be safely broken.

That loophole culture, not courtroom oath-taking as such, is Jesus' first target here, and again in Matthew 23:16-22 where the Temple-versus-gold and altar-versus-gift distinctions are the same casuistry. His answer closes every gap at once: heaven is God's throne, earth His footstool, Jerusalem His city, so every substitute reaches God anyway. A person whose yes is yes needs no formula at all. (Whether this also forbids civil oaths has been debated among Christians, notably by Quakers and Anabaptists; the scene's first edge is the loophole system.)

This section is reception history: how the passage was read and kept in the Jewish tradition. Where a reading parts from an essential of the Christian faith, the section says so at that point.

Sources: Mishnah Shevuot 4:13 (which oath formulas bind)

The words behind it

17 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Colossians 4:6

    Let your speech always be gracious, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how to answer everyone.

    it leads to

    • Ephesians 4:29

      Let no unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building up the one in need and bringing grace to those who listen.

    • 1 Peter 3:15

      But in your hearts sanctify Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give a defense to everyone who asks you the reason for the hope that is in you. But respond with gentleness and…

    • Ecclesiastes 10:12

      The words of a wise man’s mouth are gracious, but the lips of a fool consume him.

    • Mark 9:50

      Salt is good, but if the salt loses its saltiness, with what will you season it? Have salt among yourselves, and be at peace with one another.”

  • Through

    John 8:44

    You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out his desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, refusing to uphold the truth, because there is no truth in him.…

    it leads to

    • Acts 13:10

      and said, “O child of the devil and enemy of all righteousness, you are full of all kinds of deceit and trickery! Will you never stop perverting the straight ways of the Lord?

    • 1 John 3:12

      Do not be like Cain, who belonged to the evil one and murdered his brother. And why did Cain slay him? Because his own deeds were evil, while those of his brother were righteous.

    • 1 John 3:8–10

      The one who practices sin is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the very start. This is why the Son of God was revealed, to destroy the works of the…

  • Through

    James 5:12

    Above all, my brothers, do not swear, not by heaven or earth or by any other oath. Simply let your “Yes” be yes, and your “No,” no, so that you will not fall under…

    it leads to

    • Matthew 5:33–37

      Again, you have heard that it was said to the ancients, ‘Do not break your oath, but fulfill your vows to the Lord.’

Where this verse is studied

About Matthew

John the Baptist Baptizes Jesus, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
John the Baptist Baptizes Jesus, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
This page draws on 19 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Augustine of Hippo, Catena Aurea; Augustine of Hippo, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Hilary of Poitiers, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jerome, Commentary on Matthew; Jerome, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; John Calvin, Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists; John Chrysostom, Homily on Acts 8; John Chrysostom, Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 17; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Rabanus Maurus, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Tertullian, The Prescription Against Heretics; Tertullian, On the Flesh of Christ; Tertullian, Against Praxeas and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Matthew.