Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Matthew 5:36

in Matthew 5

Nor should you swear by your head, for you cannot make a single hair white or black.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, for thou canst not make one hair white or black.

KJV

Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

This verse in Matthew 5

Commentary

13 notes on this verse

A commentator

Jerome

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 420.

(Verses 34 onwards) But I say to you, do not swear at all: neither by heaven, for it is the throne of God; nor by the earth, for it is his footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. Nor should you swear by your head, because you cannot make a single hair white or black. The Jews have always had this wicked habit of swearing by the elements, as the prophetic word often accuses them (Isaiah 65). Whoever swears, worships, or loves the one by whom they swear.

This site's exposition

Do not break your oath

on Matthew 5:33-37

The fourth antithesis answers a system that ranked oaths by heaven, earth, Jerusalem or one's own head below oaths by God's name, though each touches God: "His footstool," "the city of the great King." Jesus calls for speech so truthful that no oath is needed: "let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No.’" Some read this as forbidding every oath, others as aimed at the evasive oaths of the day, since Jesus answers under oath at 26:63-64.

This site's exposition

you cannot make a single hair white or black

Albert Barnes explains that to swear by the head was to stake one's life on the truth of a claim. John Gill cites Jewish oaths by the life of the head. Chrysostom draws the point that a man is not master even of himself, so his head is no pledge of his own to give.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers4 voices

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 17 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

"Neither by thy head," saith He, "because thou canst not make one hair white or black." Here again, not as wondering at man, hath He withdrawn him from swearing by his head (for so man himself would be worshipped), but as referring the glory to God, and signifying that thou art not master even of thyself, and of course therefore not of the oaths made by thy head. For if no one would give up his own child to another, much more will not God give up His own work to thee. For though it be thy head, yet is it the property of another; and so far from being master thereof, thou shalt not be able to do with it, no not the least thing of all. For He said not, "Thou canst not make one hair grow;" but, "Not so much as change its quality."

A commentator

Tertullian

On the Apparel of Women Book II · Written before 220.

proposed

What "grace" is compatible with "injury? "What "beauty" with "impurities? "Shall a Christian woman heap saffron on her head, as upon an altar? For, whatever is wont to be burned to the honour of the unclean spirit, that-unless it is applied for honest, and necessary, and salutary uses, for which God's creature was provided-may seem to be a sacrifice. But, however, God saith, "Which of you can make a white hair black, or out of a black a white? " And so they refute the Lord!

A commentator

Chromatius of Aquileia

TRACTATE ON MATTHEW 24.3.1-4 · Written before 406.

proposed

These words of the Lord whereby he forbids us to swear by these different elements invite a double explanation.First, he wanted to draw us away from the use of oaths and the customs of human error, lest each of us through swearing by these elements …

A commentator

Jerome

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 420.

proposed

Lastly, consider that the Saviour does not here forbid to swear by God, but by the Heaven, the Earth, by Jerusalem, by a man's head. For this evil practice of swearing by the elements the Jews had always, and are thereof often accused in the prophetic writing's. For he who swears, shows either reverence or love for that by which he swears. Thus when the Jews swore by the Angels, by the city of Jerusalem, by the temple and the elements, they paid to the creature the honour and worship belonging to God; for it is commanded in the Law that we should not swear but by the Lord our God.

The Medieval Church1 voice

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 1107.

proposed

Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black. God alone swears by Himself as He is not subject to anyone or anything. Since we do not have authority over ourselves, how can we swear by our …
5 more voices on this verse

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

Neither shalt thou swear by thy head,.... This also was a common form of swearing among the Jews: take a few instances. "If anyone is bound to his friend by an oath, and says to him, vow unto me בחיי ראשך, "by the life of thy head"; R.

The Nineteenth Century4 voices

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

Neither shalt thou swear by thy head - For these plain reasons: 1st. God commands thee not to do it. 2dly. Thou hast nothing which is thy own, and thou shouldst not pledge another’s property. 3dly. It never did, and never can, answer any good purpose. And 4thly. Being a breach of the law of God, it is the way to everlasting misery.

A commentator

J.C. Ryle

1816–1900

Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew (1856)

proposed

These verses deserve the closest attention of all readers of the Bible. A right understanding of the doctrines they contain lies at the very root of Christianity. The Lord Jesus here explains more fully the meaning of his words, “I came not to destroy the law but to fulfil.”

A commentator

J.C. Ryle

1816–1900

Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew (1856)

proposed

These verses deserve the closest attention of all readers of the Bible. A right understanding of the doctrines they contain lies at the very root of Christianity. The Lord Jesus here explains more fully the meaning of his words, “I came not to destroy the law but to fulfil.”He teaches us that his Gospel magnifies the Law, and exalts its authority: he shows us that the Law, as expounded by him, was a far more spiritual and heart-searching rule than most of the Jews supposed; and he proves this by selecting three commandments out of the ten as examples of what he means. He expounds the sixth commandment. Many thought that they kept this part of God’s law so long as they did not commit actual murder. The Lord Jesus shows that its requirements go much further than this. It condemns all angry and passionate language, and especially when used without a cause. Let us mark this well. We may be perfectly innocent of taking life, and yet be guilty of breaking the sixth commandment! He expounds the seventh commandment. Many supposed that they kept this part of God’s law if they did not actually commit adultery. The Lord Jesus teaches that we may break it in our thoughts, hearts and imaginations, even when our outward conduct is moral and correct. The God with whom we have to do looks far beyond actions. With him even a glance of the eye may be a sin! He expounds the third commandment. Many fancied that they kept this part of God’s law so long as they did not swear falsely, and performed their oaths. The Lord Jesus forbids all vain and light swearing altogether. All swearing by created things, even when God’s name is not brought forward—all calling upon God to witness, excepting on the most solemn occasions—is a great sin. Now all this is very instructive. It ought to raise very serious reflections in our minds: it calls us loudly to use great searching of heart.
Neither shalt thou swear by thy head - This was a common oath. The Gentiles also used this oath. To swear by the head was the same as to swear by the life; or to say, I will forfeit my life if what I say is not true. God is the Author of the life, and to swear by that, therefore, is the same as to swear by him. Because thou canst not make one hair white or black - You have no control or right over your own life. You cannot even change one single hair. God has all that control; and it is therefore improper and profane to pledge what is God’s gift and God’s property; and it is the same as swearing by God himself.

How the passage was read

On Matthew 5:33-37

On Matthew 5:33-37

The oath culture behind “let your yes be yes”

To avoid uttering God's name, oaths in Jesus' day were commonly sworn by substitutes: by heaven, by earth, by Jerusalem, by one's own head. Around the substitutes grew a case law of which formulas actually bind. The Mishnah's oath tractate preserves exactly this reasoning: an oath administered “in the name of heaven and in the name of earth” leaves the swearer exempt, because that is not an oath in God's name (Shevuot 4:13). The practical effect was a graded honesty in which some sworn words could be safely broken.

That loophole culture, not courtroom oath-taking as such, is Jesus' first target here, and again in Matthew 23:16-22 where the Temple-versus-gold and altar-versus-gift distinctions are the same casuistry. His answer closes every gap at once: heaven is God's throne, earth His footstool, Jerusalem His city, so every substitute reaches God anyway. A person whose yes is yes needs no formula at all. (Whether this also forbids civil oaths has been debated among Christians, notably by Quakers and Anabaptists; the scene's first edge is the loophole system.)

This section is reception history: how the passage was read and kept in the Jewish tradition. Where a reading parts from an essential of the Christian faith, the section says so at that point.

Sources: Mishnah Shevuot 4:13 (which oath formulas bind)

The words behind it

15 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

6 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Matthew 6:27

    Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to his life?

    it leads to

    • Luke 12:25–26

      Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to his life?

    • Ecclesiastes 3:14

      I know that everything God does endures forever; nothing can be added to it or taken from it. God does it so that they should fear Him.

    • Psalms 39:5–6

      You, indeed, have made my days as handbreadths, and my lifetime as nothing before You. Truly each man at his best exists as but a breath. Selah

    • 1 Corinthians 12:18

      But in fact, God has arranged the members of the body, every one of them, according to His design.

  • Through

    Luke 12:25

    Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to his life?

    it leads to

    • Matthew 6:27

      Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to his life?

    • Luke 19:3

      He was trying to see who Jesus was, but could not see over the crowd because he was small in stature.

Where this verse is studied

About Matthew

John the Baptist Baptizes Jesus, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
John the Baptist Baptizes Jesus, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
This page draws on 15 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Chromatius of Aquileia, TRACTATE ON MATTHEW 24.3.1-4; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew; Jerome, Commentary on Matthew; Jerome, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; John Calvin, Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists; John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew; John Chrysostom, Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 17; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Tertullian, On the Apparel of Women Book II and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Matthew.