Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.
Jews Mourning in Exile
Jews Mourning in Exile, Eduard Bendemann, 1832, Wallraf-Richartz-Museum. Public domain.

2 Kingschapter 23

37 verses · Jeremiah, by tradition · 6th century BC · History

The king also desecrated the high places east of Jerusalem, to the south of the Mount of Corruption, which King Solomon of Israel had built for Ashtoreth the abomination of the Sidonians, for Chemosh the abomination of the Moabites, and for Milcom the abomination of the Ammonites.

Introduction

Jeremiah, by tradition, History, 2 Kings Overview.

This chapter was written for exiles who had seen the most thorough reform in their history and gone into captivity anyway. It carries Josiah's covenant, his cleansing of the land and his Passover, and then turns sharply to his death and the reigns of two of his sons. Listen for the long list of places the reform reaches, moving outward from the temple. Notice at Bethel how a word spoken three centuries earlier is kept by name. Then weigh the verses that praise Josiah beside the verses that explain why his reform could not turn the judgment.

Context

Who
Judeans who saw the most thorough reform in their history and went into exile anyway
What
An account of Josiah's covenant renewal, his destruction of the shrines from Jerusalem to Bethel and Samaria, his Passover, his death at Megiddo, and the reigns of Jehoahaz and Jehoiakim.
Where
The temple courts and the Kidron Valley, the high places from Geba to Beersheba, Bethel and the towns of Samaria, Megiddo, and Riblah.
When
About 622 to 609 BC for Josiah's reform and death, followed by Jehoahaz for three months and the start of Jehoiakim's reign in 609 BC.
Why
To show the fullest obedience any king of Judah gave the law, and to explain why it did not turn aside the judgment already spoken.

Historical context

The chapter is Josiah's until verse 30, and then belongs to two sons who reigned after him, Jehoahaz for three months and Jehoiakim for eleven years. The time runs from the covenant renewal of about 622 BC to the battle at Megiddo in 609 BC. The march Josiah went out to stop was Pharaoh Neco moving north to help what was left of Assyria against Babylon.

Show the rest of the historical context, 3 more paragraphs

The places are given in order as the reform moves outward from the temple courts to the Kidron valley and Topheth. From there it runs to the high places from Geba to Beersheba, the hill east of the city, Bethel, and the towns of Samaria. The occasion is the book found in chapter 22, and verse 24 says so outright.

A first hearer knew why bones and ashes are used the way they are here, since contact with a corpse made a place unclean under the law. Scattering bones over a shrine put it beyond use for anyone who kept the law, and grinding an image to powder did the same work. He knew the altar at Bethel as the shrine Jeroboam built when the kingdom split, and knew a man of God had cried against it long before.

Riblah appears at verse 33 as the place where Pharaoh held court, and the same town serves Babylon the same way two chapters later.

Significance

For Judah this chapter said that obedience was real and had come too late. The king who kept the law with all his heart is given the highest word the book has, and the next sentence says the anger did not turn.

Show the rest of the significance, 2 more paragraphs

It told them that the word of the LORD keeps across centuries. The altar at Bethel is pulled apart by the king a prophet had named generations earlier, and the narrator stops to say so.

And it left them a client kingdom, with Egypt deposing one king, installing the next and taxing the land to pay for it.

This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.

How it is read

This is the longest catalogue of destruction in the book, and the classical comment on it works as a glossary: what each thing was, and where it stood. Taken together it is the fullest description of the idolatry of Judah that the corpus carries on any chapter of these twelve.

The covenant is made at a fixed spot, and Rashi identifies it as the place in the Temple where the king stood to address the people (Rashi on II Kings 23:3:1, the Metsudah Tanach series of Lakewood, N.J, CC-BY). The priests of the second order are read as the deputies of the high priesthood. The Metsudah edition's note carries Metzudat David including the priest anointed for war among them, and Radak explaining their office, that they stood ready to serve in the high priest's place if he could not (Rashi on II Kings 23:4:1). The men who burned incense are placed in the cities of Judah (Rashi on II Kings 23:5:1), and the priests of the high places who are not allowed to come up to the altar are read as barred from serving there again (Rashi on II Kings 23:9:1).

Four of the glosses go to what was actually done at these places, and they are hard reading. The houses that are pulled down are read as houses of lewdness, and the note carries Metzudat David reading them instead as houses for those who gave their lives to the service of the grove and lived apart (Rashi on II Kings 23:7:1). Topheth is explained by its name. The place was called that because the priests would beat on drums so that a father would not hear his child's cries while the image burned him. The note carries Ralbag's different account of the rite, the passing of a child between two fires (Rashi on II Kings 23:10:1). The horses given to the sun are explained as horses kept ready in the morning for those who bowed to it, with Ralbag and Metzudat David in the note tracing the route they were ridden (Rashi on II Kings 23:11:1). The mount of corruption is identified as the Mount of Olives, whose name means the Mount of Oil, and Rashi says Scripture changed the name to an insulting one because the place is named here in connection with idolatry (Rashi on II Kings 23:13:1).

Two verses draw a difference of reading that the corpus itself records. At the twelfth verse Rashi reads the verb as removal. The note carries Radak deriving it two other ways, from the root for running, so that the king removed them quickly, or from the root for crushing, so that he smashed the pieces after pulling the altars down (Rashi on II Kings 23:12:1). At the seventeenth, where the king asks about the monument he sees, Rashi describes a grave with thorns and thistles overgrowing one side and myrtles and spices gracing the other, which is what made the king ask. The note carries Radak's plainer account, that the marker was simply large and unlike the others, set up by the old prophet in the hope that lying next to the man of God would spare his own bones too (Rashi on II Kings 23:17:1). Neither reading is put above the other here.

Two comments reach beyond the chapter. Rashi explains how the reform reached into the cities of Samaria at all: the king ruled over all Israel, over those of the ten tribes who had come back through the prophet Jeremiah (Rashi on II Kings 23:19:1). On the Passover kept in the eighteenth year the text says none like it had been held since the days of the judges. Rashi reads the comparison as a count of people, that so many had never gathered for it before, while the note carries Ralbag reading it as a comparison of devotion rather than of numbers (Rashi on II Kings 23:22:1). The teraphim that the king puts away are described as images that speak by sorcery, made only at a time of the year and a year chosen as fit for it (Rashi on II Kings 23:24:1).

Radak, Metzudat David and Malbim comment across this chapter at further verses, and the corpus carries those refs with the reason that Sefaria holds no English version of them, so they stand here cited and unquoted: Radak on II Kings 23:2:1, 23:6:1, 23:8:1, 23:14:1, 23:18:1 and 23:25:1; Metzudat David on II Kings 23:15:1, 23:16:1, 23:20:1 and 23:26:1; and Malbim on II Kings 23:21:1. Radak on the twenty-fifth verse stands on the sentence that no king before or after turned to the LORD as this one did, and Metzudat David on the twenty-sixth stands on the sentence that follows it, that the LORD did not turn from his anger all the same. What either makes of that pair waits on a fetch that carries the text.

What the rabbis say

The corpus carries thirty-nine rabbinic locators for this chapter and the text of none, so each is cited and linked here rather than quoted. Eight stand on the twenty-fifth verse, where there was no king like him before or after: Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Shabbat 5:10, Ein Yaakov, Shabbat 5:15, Kohelet Rabbah 1:16:1, Midrash Lekach Tov, Deuteronomy 34:10:1, Midrash Tanchuma, Mishpatim 7:6, Ruth Rabbah (Lerner) 7:3:1, Seder Olam Rabbah 24:2, and Shabbat 56b:16, with Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 10:2:13 on the verse after it.

Five stand on the grave and the monument at the seventeenth verse, and they are the same tractates the rabbis discuss the prophets in: Arakhin 33a:6, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Megillah 1:30, Ein Yaakov, Arakhin 8:3, Ein Yaakov, Megillah 1:37, and Megillah 14b:8. Four stand on the sixth verse, where the grove is burned at the brook Kidron and its dust cast on the graves of the common people: Ein Yaakov, Sanhedrin 6:17, Sanhedrin 47b:7, and Shabbat 83b:3 and 83b:4. Three stand on the thirteenth, the high places east of Jerusalem that Solomon had built: Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Shabbat 5:9, Ein Yaakov, Shabbat 5:14, and Shabbat 56b:9.

Megillah 31a:4 is anchored across the whole opening of the reform from the first verse to the ninth, and it is a place where the rabbis set out what is read in public. Jerusalem Talmud Sotah 7:4:6 stands on the third verse, where the covenant is made.

The rest follow the catalogue. On the fifth verse, Midrash Tannaim on Deuteronomy 32:1:2. On the ninth, Menachot 109a:14. On the eleventh, the horses of the sun, Introductions to Tanaitic Literature, Introductions to Tractates of the Mishnah, Kelim 385 and Shir HaShirim Rabbah 1:6:2. On the twelfth, Pesikta Rabbati 27:1 and Sanhedrin 103b:8. On the fourteenth, Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 17:14. On the sixteenth, Sukkah 38b:6. On the twentieth, Midrash Tanchuma, Ki Tisa 6:1.

The close of the reign carries the last of them. On the twenty-ninth verse, where the king goes out against Pharaoh, Midrash Lekach Tov, Genesis 32:11:2. On the thirtieth, where he is brought back dead in a chariot and the people of the land anoint his son, Horayot 11b:10, Jerusalem Talmud Shekalim 6:1:9 and Keritot 5b:4, which are the places the rabbis discuss the anointing of a king. On the thirty-first, Jerusalem Talmud Sotah 8:3:6. On the thirty-sixth and thirty-seventh, where the next king begins to reign, Midrash Lekach Tov on Esther, Introduction 2 and Aggadat Bereshit 49:4. What each of them teaches is a saying of the rabbis, and is reported as theirs wherever this site quotes one. The quotations wait on a fetch that carries the text.

Sources: Rashi, Rashi on II Kings 23:3:1, 23:4:1, 23:5:1, 23:7:1, 23:9:1, 23:10:1, 23:11:1, 23:12:1, 23:13:1, 23:17:1, 23:19:1, 23:22:1 and 23:24:1, The Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J, CC-BY; Radak, Radak, the readings the Metsudah edition carries at II Kings 23:4:1, 23:12:1 and 23:17:1, and his own refs at 23:2:1, 23:6:1, 23:8:1, 23:14:1, 23:18:1 and 23:25:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; Metzudat David, Metzudat David, the readings the Metsudah edition carries at II Kings 23:4:1, 23:7:1 and 23:11:1, and his own refs at 23:15:1, 23:16:1, 23:20:1 and 23:26:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; Ralbag, Ralbag, the readings the Metsudah edition carries at II Kings 23:10:1, 23:11:1 and 23:22:1; Malbim, Malbim on II Kings 23:21:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; The Sefaria corpus, scripts/data/sources/sefaria/2-kings/23.json, the 39 Talmud and Midrash locators of this chapter.

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

The king stands by the pillar and reads it all aloud

2 Kings 23:1-3

all the elders of Judah and Jerusalem: Josiah calls every elder to Jerusalem, then reads the whole book of the covenant aloud to the assembled nation. Standing by the pillar, he renews the covenant God cut with Israel at Horeb. Barnes reads the whole nation as pledged along with the king, not the king alone.

2 Kings 23:1

“And the king sent, and they gathered unto him all the elders of Judah and of Jerusalem. Josiah sent messengers throughout the land, and convened all the principal men in it at Jerusalem.”

he read all the words: Deuteronomy 31:10-11 required the law to be read to all Israel every seventh year, and Barnes reckons the reading had lapsed for about seventy-five years. Here the king reads it himself. Adam Clarke found it strange that the high priest and the prophets present left the reading to Josiah.

2 Kings 23:2

“The king went up into the house of the Lord - Here is another very singular circumstance. The high priest, scribes, priest, and prophets, are gathered together, with all the elders of the people, and the king himself reads the book of the covenant which had been lately found! It is strange that either the high priest, Jeremiah, Zephaniah, or some other of the prophets, who were certainly there present, did not read the sacred book! It is likely that the king considered himself a mediator between God and them, and therefore read and made the covenant.”

the king stood by the pillar: Adam Clarke reads the Hebrew al haammud as upon the platform, the bronze stand where he says the kings stood to address the people. The covenant binds heart and soul to the book. Matthew Henry reads the people's entry as their consent to keep it.

2 Kings 23:3

“By a pillar - Rather, “upon the pillar” (see 2Ki 11:14, note). Made a covenant - “The covenant.” Josiah renewed the old covenant made between God and His people in Horeb Deu 5:2, so far at least as such renewal was possible by the mere act of an individual. He bound himself by a solemn promise to the faithful performance of the entire Law. With all their heart - “Their” rather than “his,” because the king was considered as pledging the whole nation to obedience with himself.”

Vessels burned in Kidron; high places defiled from Geba to Beersheba

2 Kings 23:4-6

all the articles made for Baal: Hilkiah and the "priests second in rank" remove "all the articles made for Baal, Asherah, and all the host of heaven". The Asherah pole is burned, ground, and thrown "on the graves of the common people", to make the idol as unclean as a corpse.

2 Kings 23:4

“The priests of the second order - These were probably such as supplied the place of the high priest when he was prevented: from fulfilling the functions of his office. So the Chaldee understood the place - the sagan of the high priests. But the words may refer to those of the second course or order established by David: though it does not appear that those orders were now in use, yet the distinction was continued even to the time of our Lord.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:4

“It is a level, spacious basin, abounding at present with plantations [ROBINSON]. The brook winds along the east and south of the city, the channel of which is throughout a large portion of the year almost or wholly dry, except after heavy rains, when it suddenly swells and overflows.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

did away with the idolatrous priests: The idolatrous priests translate the Hebrew kemarim, a word Clarke ties to a root meaning scorched or blackened, and Henry links it to black robes. Zephaniah 1:4 and Hosea 10:5 name the same priests. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown trace their incense to the sun, moon and constellations back to Assyria.

2 Kings 23:5

“The idolatrous priests - הכמרים hakkemarim. Who these were is not well known. The Chaldee, Syriac, and Arabic, call them the priests simply, which the kings of Judah had ordained. Probably they were an order made by the idolatrous kings of Judah, and called kemarim, from כמר camar, which signifies to be scorched, shriveled together, made dark, or black, because their business was constantly to attend sacrificial fires, and probably they were black garments; hence the Jews in derision call Christian ministers kemarim, because of their black clothes and garments.”

the graves of the common people: The parallel at 2 Chronicles 34:4 scatters the dust over the graves of those who had sacrificed, as Jamieson, Fausset and Brown point out. Adam Clarke reads the graves of the common people as the public burial ground in the Kidron Valley. Both accounts put the idol among the dead.

2 Kings 23:6

“Josiah had it taken to Kidron, burnt the wood, ground the metal about it to powder, and strewed the ashes "on the graves of the children of the people." The poor were buried in a common on part of the valley of Kidron. But reference is here made to the graves "of those that had sacrificed" (2Ch 34:4).”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:6

“He brought out the grove - He brought out the idol Asherah. See at the end of 2Ki 21:26 (note). Upon the graves of the children of the people - I believe this; means the burial-place of the common people.”

The whole record on this verse →

2 Kings 23:7-9

the quarters of the male shrine prostitutes: The priests of the high places "from Geba to Beersheba" are brought to Jerusalem. Verse 9 keeps them from "the altar of the LORD", the law's treatment of a priest disqualified by blemish, fed but kept from the altar.

2 Kings 23:7

“The houses of the sodomites - We have already often met with these קדשים kedeshim or consecrated persons. The word implies all kinds of prostitutes, as well as abusers of themselves with mankind. Wove hangings for the grove - For Asherah; curtains or tent coverings for the places where the rites of the impure goddess were performed. See at the end of 2Ki 21:26 (note).”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:7

“These irregularities, even though the object of that worship was the true God, were prohibited in the law (De 12:11). Those who had been guilty of this sin, Josiah brought to Jerusalem.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

the gate of Joshua the governor: Geba stood on the northern edge of Judah and Beersheba on the southern, so the high places were cleared from one end to the other. Adam Clarke places the gate of Joshua where the governor of the city heard and decided cases. Altars stood even at the seat of justice.

2 Kings 23:8

“The gate of Joshua - The place where he, as governor of the city, heard and decided causes. Near this we find there were public altars, where sometimes the true God, at other times false gods, were honored.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:8

“But whether they were permitted to eat of all the sacrifices, as blemished priests were ( Lev. xxi. 22 ), which is called, in general, the bread of their God, may be justly questioned.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

they ate unleavened bread: Deuteronomy 18:6-8 allowed a Levite from the towns to serve at the chosen altar and eat equal portions there. Adam Clarke explains that these priests had sacrificed on the high places to the LORD himself, so they kept their priestly support. They kept the bread and lost the altar.

2 Kings 23:9

“The priests of the high places came not up - As these priests had offered sacrifices on the high places, though it was to the true God, yet they were not thought proper to be employed immediately about the temple; but as they were acknowledged to belong to the priesthood, they had a right to their support; therefore a portion of the tithes, offerings, and unleavened bread, shew-bread, etc., was appointed to them for their support. Thus they were treated as priests who had some infirmity which rendered it improper for them to minister at the altar.”

desecrated Topheth in the Valley of Ben-hinnom: Topheth in the Valley of Ben-hinnom is desecrated outright. Gill and the older Jewish writers hold that the drums for which the place was named were beaten to drown the children's cries. Clarke notes that this same valley, Gehenna, becomes the New Testament's picture of final judgment.

2 Kings 23:10

“He defiled Topheth - St. Jerome says that Topheth was a fine and pleasant place, well watered with fountains, and adorned with gardens. The valley of the son of Hinnom, or Gehenna, was in one part; here it appears the sacred rites of Molech were performed, and to this all the filth of the city was carried, and perpetual fires were kept up in order to consume it. Hence it has been considered a type of hell; and in this sense it is used in the New Testament.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:10

“Topheth--so called from Toph--a "drum." It is the prevailing opinion among Jewish writers that the cries of the terrified children made to pass through the fire in that place of idolatrous horror were drowned by the sound of that instrument.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

the horses that the kings of Judah: Josiah removes "the horses that the kings of Judah had dedicated to the sun". Gill traces the practice to Manasseh and Amon and to sun worship among Israel's neighbors. Clarke and Henry weigh whether the horses were living animals or carved images, and the text does not settle it.

2 Kings 23:11

“The horses that the kings of Judah had given to the sun - Jarchi says that those who adored the sun had horses which they mounted every morning to go out to meet the sun at his rising. Throughout the East the horse, because of his swiftness and utility, was dedicated to the sun; and the Greeks and Romans feigned that the chariot of the sun was drawn by four horses - Pyroeis, Eous, Aethon, and Phlegon. See the note on 2Ki 2:11. Whether these were living or sculptured horses, we cannot tell; the latter is the more reasonable supposition.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:11

“And he took away the horses that the kings of Judah had given to the sun,.... Consecrated to it; these were not images of horses, as some have thought, but real living ones; and the kings that gave them for the service of the sun, and for sacrifice to it, very probably were Manasseh and Amon: that horses were sacred to the sun with many Heathen nations, as the Massagetae, a people in Scythia, and the Persians, and Babylonians, and Ethiopians, is affirmed by various writers (c): and from them the Jews received this notion.”

The whole record on this verse →

2 Kings 23:12-14

near the upper chamber of Ahaz: Josiah pulls down the altars Manasseh set up "in the two courtyards of the house of the LORD". The high places "east of Jerusalem" go back to Solomon (1 Kings 11:7). Josiah covers the sites "with human bones", the strongest defilement the law recognized (Numbers 19:15).

2 Kings 23:12

“On the top of the upper chamber - Altars built on the flat roof of the house. Such altars were erected to the sun, moon, stars, etc.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:12

“Josiah is said not to have destroyed, but only defiled, "the high places on the hill of corruption." It is most probable that Hezekiah had long before demolished the idolatrous temples erected there by Solomon but, as the superstitious people continued to regard the spot as consecrated ground, Josiah defiled it.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

the Mount of Corruption: Adam Clarke follows Rashi and the Aramaic Targum in placing the Mount of Corruption on the Mount of Olives. Its old name, hammishchah, meant anointing. Clarke says Scripture turned it to hammashchith, corruption, for the high places King Solomon built there for Ashtoreth, Chemosh and Milcom.

2 Kings 23:13

“Mount of corruption - This, says Jarchi, following the Chaldee, was the mount of Olives, for this is the mount המשחה hammishchah, of unction; but because of the idolatrous purposes for which it was used, the Scripture changed the appellation to the mount המשחית hammashchith, of corruption. Ashtoreth the abomination, etc. - See on 1Ki 11:7 (note).”

smashed the sacred pillars: John Gill holds that Manasseh or Amon had rebuilt these high places, so the sacred pillars smashed were newer images of Ashtoreth, Chemosh and Milcom. In Gill's reading the human bones came from the graves of idolatrous priests and worshippers buried nearby. The dead defiled their own sites.

2 Kings 23:14

“And he brake in pieces the images,.... Of Ashtoreth, Chemosh, and Milcom, in the above high places; which as these high places had been rebuilt by Manasseh or Amon, so new images of these deities were placed there: and cut down the groves; in which they were set: and filled their places with the bones of men; of idolatrous priests and worshippers, buried in parts adjacent; these he dug up and scattered in the high places and groves to defile them, bones of the dead being by law unclean, Num 19:15.”

The altar at Bethel, and the sepulchre of the man of God

who had caused Israel to sin: The altar at Bethel was the high place "set up by Jeroboam son of Nebat". Josiah "burned the high place, ground it to powder, and burned the Asherah pole", as he did Jerusalem's idols. The altar of 1 Kings 12:28 is undone by a king of Judah.

2 Kings 23:15

“Moreover, the altar that was at Bethel, and the high place which Jeroboam the son of Nebat, who made Israel to sin, had made. For the worship of the calf there: both that altar, and the high place, he brake down; according to an ancient prophecy of the man of God, 1Ki 13:3 and of Amos in later times, Amo 9:1. and burnt the high place, and stamped it small to powder; that there might be no remains of it: and burnt the grove; either the grove of trees on it, or the idol that was in it.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:15

“The golden calf, it should seem, was gone ( thy calf, O Samaria! has cast thee off ), but the altar was there, which those that were wedded to their old idolatries made use of still.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

according to the word of the LORD proclaimed: Josiah sees "the tombs there on the hillside" and burns their bones "on the altar to defile it". The narrator gives the reason, "according to the word of the LORD proclaimed by the man of God", who had named Josiah (1 Kings 13:2).

2 Kings 23:16

“And as Josiah turned himself - This verse is much more complete in the Septuagint, and in the Hexaplar Syriac version at Paris. I shall give the whole, making a distinction where, in those versions, any thing is added: “And as Josiah turned himself, he spied the sepulchres that were there in the mount, and sent and took the bones out of the sepulchres, and burnt them upon the altar, and polluted it: according to the word of the Lord which the man of God proclaimed [when Jeroboam stood by the altar at the feast.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:16

“But it is remarkable that this act was predicted three hundred twenty-six years before his birth, and his name also was expressly mentioned, as well as the very place where it should be done (1Ki 13:2). This is one of the most most remarkable prophecies in the Bible.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 Kings 23:17-18

Josiah asks, "What is this monument I see?" The men answer that it is "the tomb of the man of God who came from Judah". Josiah orders, "Do not let anyone disturb his bones", and the bones of "the prophet who had come from Samaria" are left with them.

2 Kings 23:17

“What title is that - There was either a stone, an image, or an inscription here: the old prophet no doubt took care to have the place made sufficiently remarkable.”

The old prophet of 1 Kings 13:11 lived at Bethel, and this verse calls him the prophet who had come from Samaria. Samaria names the northern kingdom by the capital Omri built at 1 Kings 16:24, decades after that prophet died. Both sets of bones stayed in the ground.

2 Kings 23:18

“And he said, let him alone, let no man move his bones,.... Not take them out of the grave, as they had done the rest: so they let his bones alone, with the bones of the prophet that came out of Samaria; the old prophet, whereby his end was answered in being buried with him, 1Ki 13:31.”

2 Kings 23:19-20

in the cities of Samaria he removed: Josiah's reform crosses Judah's border. He slaughters "all the priests of the high places" on their own altars and burns "human bones on them". Israel had no king of its own by this time, and the northern campaign closes inside two verses: "Then he returned to Jerusalem".

2 Kings 23:19

“That were in the cities of Samaria - Israel had now no king; and Josiah, of the blood royal of Judah, had certainly a direct right to the kingdom; he had, at this time, an especial commission from God, to reform every abuse through the whole land - all that ground that was given by the Lord as an inheritance to the twelve sons of Jacob. Therefore he had every right to carry his plans of reformation into the Samaritan states.”

he slaughtered all the priests: The man of God had foretold at 1 Kings 13:2 that Josiah would sacrifice the priests of the high places on the altar at Bethel. Adam Clarke holds that as corrupters of the people their lives were forfeit under the law. Judah's own priests were spared.

2 Kings 23:20

“Slew all the priests - The lives of these, as corrupters of the people, were forfeited to the law.”

A Passover unlike any since the days of the judges

2 Kings 23:21-23

The king commands, "Keep the Passover of the LORD your God, as it is written in this Book of the Covenant," the book newly found. The record says no such Passover had been observed "from the days of the judges" through all the days of the kings.

2 Kings 23:21

“And the king commanded all the people,.... Not at Jerusalem only, but throughout the whole kingdom: saying: keep the passover unto the Lord your God, as it is written in this book of the covenant; which had been lately found and read, and they had agreed to observe, and in which this ordinance was strictly enjoined, and was a commemoration of their deliverance out of Egypt, and a direction of their faith to the Messiah, the antitype of the passover.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:21

“See 2Ki 23:4 note. With this verse the author returns to the narrative of what was done in Josiah’s 18th year. The need of the injunction, “as it was written in the book of this covenant,” was owing to the fact - not that Josiah had as yet held no Passover - but that the reading of the book had shown him differences between the existing practice and the letter of the Law - differences consequent upon negligence, or upon the fact that tradition had been allowed in various points to override the Law.”

The whole record on this verse →

No such Passover had been observed: Hezekiah's Passover at 2 Chronicles 30 was kept in the second month with many worshippers unpurified, and this one followed the law's directions in full. Albert Barnes finds its greatness in the crowds and in that exactness. Adam Clarke places it in the manner and spirit.

2 Kings 23:22

“Surely there was not holden such a passover - Not one on purer principles, more heartily joined in by the people present, more literally consecrated, or more religiously observed. The words do not apply to the number present, but to the manner and spirit. See the particulars and mode of celebrating this passover in 2 Chronicles 35:1-18 (note).”

this Passover was observed: John Gill reckons that the finding of the book, the covenant and the purge all fell before the fourteenth day of Nisan, the Passover date. Nisan runs from March into April. The whole reform of 22:3 to 23:20 fits inside one year.

2 Kings 23:23

“But in the eighteenth year of king Josiah, wherein this passover was holden to the Lord in Jerusalem. This shows that Josiah must begin the reformation very early that year, since he did all that is before recorded in this and the preceding chapter by the fourteenth of Nisan, the day on which the passover was kept, which month answers to part of our March and part of April, see 2Ki 22:3 and was the same year the repairs of the temple were finished.”

removed the mediums and spiritists: Josiah clears out mediums, wizards, household idols, and every abomination in Judah and Jerusalem, the very practices Deut 18:10-11 named as detestable to the LORD. Barnes reads perform here as establish, the king rooting out private divination that had survived under cover of formal worship of the LORD himself.

2 Kings 23:24

“Perform - Rather, establish. Josiah saw that it was necessary, not only to put down open idolatry, but also to root out the secret practices of a similar character which were sometimes combined with the worship of Yahweh, notwithstanding that the Law forbade them (marginal references), and which probably formed, with many, practically almost the whole of their religion.”

Neither before nor after Josiah was there: Of Josiah the text says, "Neither before nor after Josiah was there any king like him," the same superlative given to Hezekiah at 18:5. The two verses praise different things. Hezekiah is praised for his trust, and Josiah for turning to the LORD.

2 Kings 23:25

“And like unto him was there no king before him,.... The same is said of Hezekiah, 2Ki 18:5, Hezekiah might excel him in some things, as Josiah might excel Hezekiah in others: that turned to the Lord with all his heart, and with all his soul, and with all his might; with such sincerity, heartiness, zeal, and constancy: according to all the law of Moses; having respect to every commandment, especially relative to worship, with the greatest precision and exactness: neither after him arose there any like him; for all to the captivity were wicked princes.”

3 more voices on this verse

2 Kings 23:25

“Nobody must think that anything was detracted to the celerity of death because of one's merits. Enoch was kidnapped, lest malice might spoil his heart, and Josiah, who celebrated the Passover of the Lord in the eighteenth year of his reign in such a manner that he overcame in piousness all the previous kings, did not survive longer through the merits of his faith. No, rather, because grievous destruction threatened the Jewish people, the just king was taken away beforehand.”

Ambrose of Milan · written before 397 · Consolation on the Death of Emperor Valentinian 57patristic

2 Kings 23:25

“And like unto him ... - See 2Ki 18:5 note. We must not press the letter of either passage, but regard both kings as placed among the very best of the kings of Judah.”

2 Kings 23:25

“Notwithstanding this he was cut off by a violent death in the midst of his days, and his kingdom was ruined within a few years after. Consequent upon such a reformation as this, one would have expected nothing but the prosperity and glory both of king and kingdom; but, quite contrary, we find both under a cloud. Even the reformed kingdom continues marked for ruin.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Megiddo: Josiah falls before Pharaoh-necoh

2 Kings 23:26-27

the LORD did not turn away from: "Nevertheless, the LORD did not turn away from the fury of His burning anger", which Manasseh had provoked, the judgment already announced at 21:12. The LORD says, "I will remove Judah from My sight, just as I removed Israel". He will reject the city He chose and the temple.

2 Kings 23:26

“That is certainly true, which God spoke by the prophet ( Jer. xviii. 7, 8 ), that if a nation, doomed to destruction, turn from the evil of sin, God will repent of the evil of punishment; and therefore we must conclude that Josiah's people, though they submitted to Josiah's power, did not heartily imbibe Josiah's principles.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:26

“Though outwardly purified, their hearts were not right towards God, as appears from many passages of the prophetic writings; their thorough reform was hopeless; and God, who saw no sign of genuine repentance, allowed His decree (2Ki 21:12-15) for the subversion of the kingdom to take fatal effect.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

Albert Barnes finds Judah's guilt heavier for having watched Israel removed at 17:18 and failing to learn from it. Jeremiah 3:8 brings the same charge against Judah as Israel's unfaithful sister. The warning had stood for a century.

2 Kings 23:27

“It added to the guilt of Judah that she had had the warning of her sister Israel’s example, and had failed to profit by it.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:27

“As an evidence of this, even the reforming king is cut off in the midst of his usefulness--in mercy to him, that he might not see the evil which was coming upon his kingdom, but in wrath to his people, for his death was an inlet to their desolations.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Kings 23:28-30

Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Judah?: Pharaoh Neco marches up "to help the king of Assyria at the Euphrates River", and Josiah is killed at Megiddo in a single clause. The account at 2 Chronicles 35:22-25 adds that he went disguised into the battle and that Jeremiah lamented him.

2 Kings 23:28

“Josiah lived for 13 years after the celebration of his great Passover. Of this period we know absolutely nothing, except that in the course of it he seems to have submitted himself to Nabopolassar; who, after the fall of Nineveh, was accepted as the legitimate successor of the Assyrian monarchs by all the nations of the western coast. Josiah, after perhaps a little hesitation (see Jer 2:18, Jer 2:36), followed the example of his neighbors, and frankly accepted the position of an Assyro-Babylonian tributary.”

marched up to help the king: Barnes dates Neco's accession after his father Psammetichus to 610 BC, with a reign of sixteen years. The older English versions had Neco marching against Assyria, and John Wesley and Adam Clarke took that Assyrian king to be the ruler of Babylon. The Berean text has Neco coming to help.

2 Kings 23:29

“Pharaoh-Nechoh - This king is well known to us both from profane historians, and from the Egyptian monuments. He succeeded his father Psammetichus (Psamatik) in the year 610 B.C., and was king of Egypt for 16 years. He was an enlightened and enterprising monarch. The great expedition here mentioned was an attempt to detach from the newly-formed Babylonian empire the important tract of country extending from Egypt to the Euphrates at Carchemish.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:29

“Some understand the promise made to him that he should come to his grave in peace in a sense in which it was not performed because, by his miscarriage in this matter, he forfeited the benefit of it. God has promised to keep us in all our ways; but, if we go out of our way, we throw ourselves out of his protection.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse →

carried his body in a chariot: Adam Clarke reads the Hebrew met as dying, and 2 Chronicles 35:24 has Josiah moved to a second chariot and dying in Jerusalem. Albert Barnes takes the anointing as a sign of an irregular succession, as with Solomon at 1 Kings 1:34. Solomon too was a younger son.

2 Kings 23:30

“Dead from Megiddo - The word מת meth should here be considered as a participle, dying, for it is certain he was not dead: he was mortally wounded at Megiddo, was carried in a dying state to Jerusalem, and there he died and was buried. See 2Ch 35:24. Herodotus, lib. i., c. 17, 18, 25, and lib. ii. 159, appears to refer to the same war which is here mentioned. He says that Nechoh, in the sixth year of his reign, went to attack the king of Assyria at Magdolum, gained a complete victory, and took Cadytis.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:30

“Jehoahaz - Who was younger than Jehoiakim, yet preferred by the people before the elder brother; either because Jehoiakim refused the kingdom for fear of Pharaoh, whom he knew he should hereby provoke. Or because Jehoahaz was the more stout and warlike prince; whence he is called a lion, Ezek xix, 3.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The whole record on this verse →

Jehoahaz in chains; Jehoiakim taxes the land

2 Kings 23:31-32

Jehoahaz was twenty-three years old: Jehoahaz "reigned in Jerusalem three months," and "he did evil in the sight of the LORD, just as his fathers had done." Gill identifies him with Shallum at Jeremiah 22:11. Wesley notes the people chose him, the more warlike younger brother, over the elder Eliakim.

2 Kings 23:31

“Jehoahaz was twenty three years old when he began to reign,.... Who seems to be the same with Shallum, Jer 22:11. and he reigned three months in Jerusalem; a short reign, being deposed by the king of Egypt, as after related: and his mother's name was Hamutal, the daughter of Jeremiah of Libnah; a city in the tribe of Judah, Jos 10:29.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:31

“Jehoahaz was twenty and three years old - This was not the eldest son of Josiah, which is evident from this, that he was twenty-three years old when he began to reign; that he reigned but three months; that, being dethroned, his brother Eliakim was put in his place, who was then twenty-five years of age. Eliakim, therefore, was the eldest brother; but Jehoahaz was probably raised to the throne by the people, as being of a more active and martial spirit.”

The whole record on this verse →

just as his fathers had done: John Wesley and John Gill take his fathers to mean Manasseh and Amon, whose idolatry returned within months of Josiah's death. Wesley counts twenty-two years from Josiah's burial to the fall of Jerusalem. In his words, Jerusalem saw no good day after.

2 Kings 23:32

“And he did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord,.... Committed idolatry: according to all that his fathers had done; his grand father and great grandfather, Amon and Manasseh; so soon after Josiah's death was the revolt to idolatry.”

1 more voice on this verse

2 Kings 23:32

“His fathers - His grand-parents, Manasseh, and Amon. He restored that idolatry which his father had destroyed. Jerusalem saw not a good day, after Josiah was laid in his grave; but one trouble came after another, 'till within two and twenty years it was destroyed.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Kings 23:33-35

imprisoned Jehoahaz at Riblah in the land: Pharaoh Neco imprisons Jehoahaz and imposes on Judah "a levy of a hundred talents of silver and a talent of gold". He makes Eliakim king and "changed Eliakim’s name to Jehoiakim", which Wesley reads as the conqueror's claim of dominion, the gesture given to conquered vassals.

2 Kings 23:33

“Pharaoh-Nechoh, after bringing Phoenicia and Syria under his rule, and penetrating as far as Carchemish, returned to Southern Syria, and learned what had occurred at Jerusalem in his absence. He sent orders to Jehoahaz to attend the court which he was holding at Riblah, and Jehoahaz fell into the trap Eze 19:4. Riblah still retains its name. It is situated on the Orontes, in the Coele-Syrian valley, near the point where the valley opens into a wide and fertile plain. Neco seems to have been the first to perceive its importance.”

Pharaoh Neco made Eliakim: Eliakim means God will raise up, and Jehoiakim puts the name YHWH in place of El, as Adam Clarke and Albert Barnes explain. Barnes notes that Neco made him king in place of his father Josiah. In that reading, Egypt never counted Jehoahaz as king.

2 Kings 23:34

“Turned his name to Jehoiakim - These names are precisely the same in signification: Eliakim is God shall arise; Jehoiakim, Jehovah shall arise; or, the resurrection of God; the resurrection of Jehovah. That is, God’s rising again to show his power, justice, etc. The change of the name was to show Nechoh’s supremacy, and that Jehoiakim was only his vassal or viceroy.”

2 more voices on this verse

2 Kings 23:34

“This Jehoahaz is that young lion whom Ezekiel speaks of in his lamentation for the princes of Israel, that learnt to catch the prey and devour men (that was the evil which he did in the sight of the Lord); but the nations heard of him, he was taken in their pit, and they brought him with chains into the land of Egypt, Ezek. xix.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Kings 23:34

“Jehoiakim - The giving of names was accounted an act of dominion; which therefore parents did to their children, and conquerors to their vassals or tributaries.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

each according to his wealth: Adam Clarke describes Jehoiakim as Neco's viceroy, placed on the throne to exact the silver and the gold. Clarke doubted he taxed the land by wealth. Matthew Henry adds that paying Pharaoh made the king poor without making him good.

2 Kings 23:35

“Jehoiakim gave the silver and the gold - Nechoh had placed him there as viceroy, simply to raise and collect his taxes. Every one according to his taxation - That is, each was assessed in proportion to his property: that was the principle avowed: but there is reason to fear that this bad king was not governed by it.”

2 Kings 23:36-37

Jehoiakim was twenty-five years old: Jehoiakim "reigned in Jerusalem eleven years", under Egypt's hand and then Babylon's. Like every king since Josiah's death, "he did evil in the sight of the LORD, just as his fathers had done". Barnes points ahead to Jeremiah's indictment of this king (Jeremiah 22:13-19).

2 Kings 23:36

“Jehoiakim was twenty and five years old when he began to reign,.... And therefore must be two years older than his brother Jehoahaz, who was deposed: and he reigned eleven years in Jerusalem; and therefore must die at the age of thirty and six: and his mother's name was Zebudah, the daughter of Pedaiah of Rumah; which Josephus (l) calls Abuma; but he speaks of a village in Galilee called Ruma (m); but whether the same with this is not certain. (l) Antiqu. l. 10. c. 5. sect. 2. (m) De Bello Jud l. 3. c. 6. sect. 21.”

he did evil in the sight: Jeremiah 36:23-24 records Jehoiakim cutting up the scroll and burning it as it was read, and neither he nor his servants tore their garments. His father had torn his clothes at the reading of the book in 22:11. The son burned the scroll.

2 Kings 23:37

“He did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord - He was a most unprincipled and oppressive tyrant. Jeremiah gives us his character at large, Jer 22:13-19, to which the reader will do well to refer. Jeremiah was at that time in the land, and was an eyewitness of the abominations of this cruel king.”

How this psalm is built

The form: A reform account built as an inventory of destruction, closing in a battle report and two regnal notices under foreign appointment, as Albert Barnes, with Matthew Henry classes it.

The patterns in this chapter

The devices this chapter is built on, what each one does, and one verse where it stands.
DeviceWhat it doesWhere to see it
Burned, ground to powder, and scatteredOne sequence of three acts falls on the Asherah at verse 6, on the roof altars at verse 12 and on the high place at Bethel at verse 15, and the dust goes each time onto ground that makes return impossible, the graves of the common people or the Kidron. The site's exposition note on 23:4 to 6, which cites Clarke with Henry, reads the scattering as an act meant to make the idol as unclean as a corpse. Human bones do the same work at verses 14, 16 and 20, and the note on 23:12 to 14 calls that the strongest defilement the law recognised.Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, cited by the site's exposition note on 2 Kings 23:4 to 6.2 Kings 23:6, 2 Kings 23:12, 2 Kings 23:14, 2 Kings 23:15, 2 Kings 23:20
The shrines taken down in order, oldest sin lastVerses 4 to 20 run through the country shrine by shrine: the vessels of Baal and Asherah, the idolatrous priests, the Asherah in the house, the quarters inside the precinct, the high places from Geba to Beersheba, Topheth in the Valley of Ben-hinnom, the horses of the sun at the temple door, the roof altars of Ahaz and the court altars of Manasseh, the high places Solomon himself had built east of the city, and last the altar at Bethel. The list runs backward in time as it goes, and the site's exposition note on 23:12 to 14 makes the point that Josiah defiles the ground his own ancestor first profaned at 1 Kings 11:7.Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, 1871, cited by the site's exposition note on 2 Kings 23:12 to 14.2 Kings 23:4, 2 Kings 23:8, 2 Kings 23:10, 2 Kings 23:11, 2 Kings 23:13, 2 Kings 23:15
Ashes carried to Bethel, and Bethel pulled downVerse 4 sends the ashes of the temple vessels to Bethel and verse 15 arrives there to pull the altar itself apart, so the reform opens and closes at the same place. The site's exposition note on 23:15, which cites Gill with Henry, records that the phrase the Berean renders who had caused Israel to sin closes here on its last of seventeen occurrences across the two books, and that the altar which opened the north's history of apostasy at 1 Kings 12:28 is undone by a king of Judah at the other end of that history.John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament, 1748 to 1763, cited by the site's exposition note on 2 Kings 23:15.2 Kings 23:4, 2 Kings 23:15, 1 Kings 12:28
What is this monument I seeThe one question in a chapter of orders stops the work in its place. The men of the city answer that the marker belongs to the man of God who cried against this altar, and Josiah orders the bones left alone. The site's exposition note on 23:17 to 18, which cites Gill with Clarke, records that the mercy answers the old prophet's own request at 1 Kings 13:31, and that his bones are spared because they lie beside the other man's. Rashi describes the grave Josiah saw, one side overgrown with thorns and the other graced with myrtles and spices.Rashi, Rashi on II Kings 23:17:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, fetched from Sefaria under CC-BY.2 Kings 23:17, 2 Kings 23:18, 1 Kings 13:31

The historical value

14 more paragraphs on the patterns

Megiddo and Carchemish put this chapter into the international record. The guide dates Josiah's death at Megiddo to 609 BC, and the site's exposition note on verses 28 to 30 records the political reason for the march, that Pharaoh Neco was moving toward the Euphrates to aid a failing Assyrian empire against Babylon. The site's exposition note on 24:7 states the result of the campaign that followed, that after Carchemish Pharaoh never again leaves his own land, and Rashi, at 24:7, dates that battle to the fourth year of Jehoiakim at Carchemish on the Euphrates and cites Jeremiah 46:2 for it.

Riblah in the land of Hamath appears here for the first time in the book, at verse 33, as the place where Neco holds court and imprisons Jehoahaz. It returns at 25:6 and 25:21 as Nebuchadnezzar's own field headquarters, which the site's exposition note on 25:6 to 7 records. The same town serves two empires within a generation, which is the kind of detail a compiler writing from memory would have no reason to supply.

The tribute figures at verse 33 are specific, a hundred talents of silver and a talent of gold, and verse 35 records how it was raised, by assessing the land and taxing each man according to his wealth. The site's exposition note on those verses, which cites Barnes with Wesley, reads the renaming of Eliakim as the conqueror's own claim of dominion, a gesture given to conquered vassals across the ancient world, and the same gesture returns at 24:17 when Babylon renames Mattaniah.

The valley of verse 10 is a real place with a long afterlife. The site's exposition note on 23:10, which cites Gill with Clarke, records that Topheth in the Valley of Hinnom is defiled outright so that no one could pass a son or daughter through the fire there again, and that Clarke notes this same valley, Gehenna, becomes the New Testament's picture of final judgment.

The debated concept

The two superlatives of this book stand in the same argument. Verse 25 says no king before or after matched Josiah, and 18:5 said the same of Hezekiah. The site's exposition note on 23:25, which cites Keil with Barnes, records that Keil and the site's own bench read the two verses as praising different things, Hezekiah's trust in the Assyrian crisis and Josiah's thoroughness in law-keeping reform, and that both statements stand rather than being ranked against each other. Barnes cautions against pressing either verse's letter too hard.

Huldah's promise of peace and Josiah's death in battle is carried by the dossier with two positions and their holders. The traditional reading, which the dossier attributes to Keil and Delitzsch and most conservative commentators, takes in peace as peace from the coming destruction and points to the honoured burial of verse 30. The second position is held by readers who note that 2 Chronicles 35:21 to 22 has Josiah refusing a word sent through Neco and going into the fight disguised, which frames the death as a step taken against warning. The dossier records that both agree Josiah did not live to see Jerusalem fall. The door is /featured/huldah.

What the compiler is doing at verses 26 and 27 is the third question, and the guide carries it under authorship. The guide's contested table sets the traditional reading, which names Jeremiah as compiler on b. Bava Batra 15a, against the critical reading of Martin Noth's single exilic Deuteronomistic Historian and Frank Moore Cross's two-edition theory of a Josianic first edition and an exilic revision. The guide's own flag on that row states that both readings are presented without adjudicating between them, that both agree the final form is exilic and theologically purposeful, and that the book's inspired status and historical reliability are affirmed regardless of the human compiler's identity. A reader weighing verse 25 against verses 26 and 27 meets that question directly, because the two-edition theory is built on exactly this seam.

The divine connection and the word spoken ahead of its time

Verse 16 is the plainest predictive claim in the two books, and it is written here to the Evidence Standard. What the text says is that Josiah burned the bones on the Bethel altar to defile it, and that he did so according to the word of the LORD, proclaimed by a man of God generations before. What it points back to is 1 Kings 13:2, where a man of God from Judah cries against that altar while Jeroboam stood beside it and names a child of the house of David, Josiah by name. The site's exposition note on 23:16, which cites Jamieson, Fausset and Brown with Keil, records that Josiah is one of only two figures in the Old Testament named in prophecy ahead of birth, Cyrus at Isaiah 44:28 being the other, and that Jamieson, Fausset and Brown call it among the plainest predictive words in Scripture.

What is contested is stated with it. The fulfilment and the prophecy stand in one work, so a reader who asks how the claim is weighed is asking about the composition of that work, which is the question the guide's contested table carries under authorship and which Cross's two-edition theory answers one way and the traditional reading another. The claim as the page presents it is the claim the text makes, and the site records where the argument about it runs rather than settling it here.

The chapter's other theological statement is the limit put on reform. Verses 26 and 27 say that the anger stood, and that the LORD would remove Judah from His sight as He removed Israel and reject the city and the house where He had put His name. The site's exposition note on those verses reads the promise of Deuteronomy 12, answered at 1 Kings 8:29 and 9:3, as reversed here in the same terms it was given.

How the rest of Scripture reads this chapter

2 Chronicles 34 and 35 carry the reform and the Passover at greater length, and 2 Chronicles 35:22 to 25 adds that Josiah went disguised into the battle and that Jeremiah lamented him. Jeremiah 22:11 names Jehoahaz as Shallum, which the site's exposition note on verses 31 and 32 records from Gill, and Ezekiel 19:3 calls him a young lion. Jeremiah 22:13 to 19 is the prophet's own indictment of Jehoiakim, written by a man who watched the reign, which the site's note on verses 36 and 37 points to from Barnes. The valley of verse 10 supplies the New Testament word Gehenna.

Keep studying

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The form and classifications

Albert Barnes, Notes on the Old Testament, cited by the site's exposition note on 2 Kings 23:1 to 3; Albert Barnes, with Matthew Henry, Notes on the Old Testament and Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, cited together by the site's exposition note on 2 Kings 23:1 to 3 and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, with Keil, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, 1871, and The Books of the Kings, cited together by the site's exposition note on 2 Kings 23:16.

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Berean Standard Bible, Jeremiah 36:23-24; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil, The Books of the Kings and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.