Skip to content
mannafest.faith
In a wide landscape of trees, a river valley and a ruined temple with pink columns, an old man in an orange robe bends over an open wooden chest while a young man holds up its lid; a man in a red cloak and a woman holding a baby stand beside them, a seated woman and two children wait by another chest, and at the right a young woman reclines against bundles and a jar beside a second woman, with sheep, goats and an ox behind them

Genesis 31:19 to 35 · Subject · Featured Study

The teraphim

The household figures called teraphim, which Laban, Micah, Michal and the king of Babylon kept or consulted.

In a wide landscape of trees, a river valley and a ruined temple with pink columns, an old man in an orange robe bends over an open wooden chest while a young man holds up its lid; a man in a red cloak and a woman holding a baby stand beside them, a seated woman and two children wait by another chest, and at the right a young woman reclines against bundles and a jar beside a second woman, with sheep, goats and an ox behind them

Laurent de La Hyre, Laban Searching Jacob's Baggage for the Stolen Idols, 1647, Musée du Louvre. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons, File:Laban_cherchant_ses_idoles_dans_les_bagages_de_Jacob_-_Laurent_de_La_Hyre_-_Musée_du_Louvre_Peintures_INV_5354_%3B_MR_1848.jpg

Laurent de La Hyre, Laban Searching Jacob's Baggage for the Stolen Idols, 1647, Musée du Louvre. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons, File:Laban_cherchant_ses_idoles_dans_les_bagages_de_Jacob_-_Laurent_de_La_Hyre_-_Musée_du_Louvre_Peintures_INV_5354_%3B_MR_1848.jpg

THE ARTWORKLa Hyre painted Laban's search of Jacob's baggage for the gods Rachel had hidden, Genesis 31:33 to 35, and set it among trees, hills and a ruined temple.

Rachel stole her father's household idols, and the prophets later named such figures among the things that deceive.

Summary

Teraphim were figures used in worship and in seeking omens, and the law of Moses forbids both idols and omens.

  • The Hebrew word teraphim stands in fifteen verses, from Genesis 31:19 to Zechariah 10:2.
  • Micah of Ephraim made them for his shrine, and the Danites carried them north with his priest.
  • Samuel set them beside divination when he rebuked Saul, and Josiah removed them from Judah under the law.
  • Genesis gives no reason for Rachel's theft, and Gordon's reading of the Nuzi tablets offers one.

From Rachel's Tent to Michal's Ruse

Genesis 31, Judges 17 and 18 and 1 Samuel 19 show the figures in use.

Jacob left Paddan-aram with his wives, his children and his flocks.

Now while Laban was out shearing his sheep, Rachel stole her father’s household idols.
Genesis 31:19BSB

The teraphim enter Scripture here, and Laban's pursuit in the rest of the chapter turns on this theft.

Laban pursued Jacob for seven days and overtook him in the hill country of Gilead.

Now you have gone off because you long for your father’s house. But why have you stolen my gods?” “I was afraid,” Jacob answered, “for I thought you would take your daughters from me by force. If you find your gods with anyone here, he shall not live! In the presence of our relatives, see for yourself if anything is yours, and take it back.” For Jacob did not know that Rachel had stolen the idols.
Genesis 31:30 to 32BSB

Jacob stakes the life of the thief without knowing who it was.

Now Rachel had taken Laban’s household idols, put them in the saddlebag of her camel, and was sitting on them. And Laban searched everything in the tent but found nothing. Rachel said to her father, “Sir, do not be angry that I cannot stand up before you; for I am having my period.” So Laban searched, but could not find the household idols.
Genesis 31:34 to 35BSB

These verses end the search and hold the last use of the word in Genesis.

In the days of the judges Micah of Ephraim kept a shrine for his household.

Now this man Micah had a shrine, and he made an ephod and some household idols, and ordained one of his sons as his priest. In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.
Judges 17:5 to 6BSB

Judges ties the shrine to the years before Israel had a king.

Five Danite spies found the shrine on their way to Laish and came back with six hundred armed men to take it.

He replied, “You took the gods I had made, and my priest, and went away. What else do I have? How can you say to me, ‘What is the matter with you?’”
Judges 18:24BSB

Micah's complaint shows that losing the figures left him with nothing he valued.

In Saul's reign Michal, David's wife, used one of the figures to cover her husband's escape.

Then Michal took a household idol and laid it in the bed, placed some goat hair on its head, and covered it with a garment.
1 Samuel 19:13BSB

The figure won time for David after Michal lowered him from the window.

Where the Word Stands

The word appears in the Law, the histories and the prophets, from Genesis to Zechariah.

  • Berean rendering
    household idols
    Who holds them
    Laban, then Rachel
    What is done with them
    Rachel steals them
  • Berean rendering
    household idols
    Who holds them
    Rachel
    What is done with them
    She sits on them in her camel's saddlebag
  • Berean rendering
    household idols
    Who holds them
    Rachel
    What is done with them
    Laban searches and cannot find them
  • Berean rendering
    household idols
    Who holds them
    Micah of Ephraim
    What is done with them
    He makes them with an ephod
  • Berean rendering
    household gods
    Who holds them
    Micah
    What is done with them
    Danite spies report them
  • Berean rendering
    household idols
    Who holds them
    Micah
    What is done with them
    The five spies take them
  • Berean rendering
    household idols
    Who holds them
    Micah
    What is done with them
    The priest questions the spies
  • Berean rendering
    household idols
    Who holds them
    Micah's priest
    What is done with them
    The priest takes them and goes with the Danites
  • Berean rendering
    idolatry
    Who holds them
    No holder named
    What is done with them
    Samuel likens Saul's arrogance to their wickedness
  • Berean rendering
    household idol
    Who holds them
    Michal, David's wife
    What is done with them
    She lays one in the bed in David's place
  • Berean rendering
    idol
    Who holds them
    Michal
    What is done with them
    Saul's messengers find it in the bed
  • Berean rendering
    household gods
    Who holds them
    The people of Judah
    What is done with them
    Josiah removes them from the land
  • Berean rendering
    idols
    Who holds them
    The king of Babylon
    What is done with them
    He consults them for an omen
  • Berean rendering
    idol
    Who holds them
    The Israelites
    What is done with them
    Israel is to live many days without them
  • Berean rendering
    idols
    Who holds them
    Those who consult them
    What is done with them
    They speak deceit and the people wander
Fifteen rows give each verse that uses the word teraphim, the Berean rendering there, who holds the figures and what is done with them.

Whom Micah's Shrine Served

Judges 17 joins the LORD's name to a graven image, and its readers have taken the shrine in two ways.

And when he had returned the eleven hundred shekels of silver to his mother, she said, “I wholly dedicate the silver to the LORD for my son’s benefit, to make a graven image and a molten idol. Therefore I will now return it to you.”
Judges 17:3BSB

Micah's mother gives the silver to the LORD and in the same sentence orders an image made from it.

A chapel for the worship of the true GodAdam Clarke; John Wesley

Adam Clarke, on Judges 17:5, takes the house of God as a private chapel where mother and son meant to worship the true God.

John Wesley, on Judges 18:24, holds that Micah took the images for lower gods through whom he offered his worship to the true God.

A temple of idol worshipRashi

Rashi, on Judges 17:5, reads the shrine as a temple of idol worship.

Size, Shape and Use

Micah's shrine, the king of Babylon's omen and the commentators show the figures' size and use.

In Micah's house the teraphim stood with an ephod, a graven image and a molten idol.

For the king of Babylon stands at the fork in the road, at the junction of the two roads, to seek an omen: He shakes the arrows, he consults the idols, he examines the liver.
Ezekiel 21:21BSB

The king of Babylon's use shows the teraphim known as a tool of divination beyond Israel.

The commentators on their size and useJamieson, Fausset & Brown; Albert Barnes; Adam Clarke; Rashi

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown describe Rachel's seat as the common pack saddle, which was often used as a cushion to sit or lean on.

Albert Barnes, on 1 Samuel 19:13, judged Michal's figure a bust in human form as large as life.

Adam Clarke, on Ezekiel 21:21, counts three kinds of divination there: by arrows, by images or talismans, and by the entrails of a sacrifice.

Rashi, in his commentary on 2 Kings 23:24, calls the teraphim images that speak through sorcery.

The Word Teraphim

The Hebrew noun, Strong's H8655, is found only in the plural.

In 1 Samuel 19:13 and 19:16 that plural names the single figure Michal laid in the bed.

The Berean text has no single English word for it and renders it household idols, household gods, idols, idol or idolatry.

Laban and Micah both call the figures elohim, gods, in Genesis 31:30 and Judges 18:24.

Jerome, in his Hebrew Questions on Genesis, reports that Aquila translated the word into Greek as figures or images.

What the Text Leaves Unsaid

Genesis 31 and 1 Samuel 19 raise two questions that their verses do not answer.

Genesis does not say what became of Rachel's figures after Laban's search.

So they gave Jacob all their foreign gods and all their earrings, and Jacob buried them under the oak near Shechem.
Genesis 35:4BSB

The word teraphim does not stand here, so the text never ties this burial to Rachel's theft.

Rashi, on Genesis 35:2, reads those gods as plunder from the sack of the city in Genesis 34.

1 Samuel does not say whose the figure in David's house was, or why it was there.

John Gill, on 1 Samuel 19:13, judged that Michal kept it privately, since David would not have allowed it in his house had he known.

How Scripture Judges Them

Samuel, the law and the prophets condemn the figures, and Hosea counts them among the things Israel would lose.

After Saul spared Agag and the best of the Amalekites' flocks, Samuel rebuked him in words that use the term.

For rebellion is like the sin of divination, and arrogance is like the wickedness of idolatry. Because you have rejected the word of the LORD, He has rejected you as king.”
1 Samuel 15:23BSB

The word behind idolatry in this verse is teraphim, so Samuel weighs Saul's arrogance against the figures themselves.

Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son or daughter in the fire, practices divination or conjury, interprets omens, practices sorcery, casts spells, consults a medium or spiritist, or inquires of the dead.
Deuteronomy 18:10 to 11BSB

The teraphim of Ezekiel 21:21 and Zechariah 10:2 served the very practices this law forbids.

Furthermore, Josiah removed the mediums and spiritists, the household gods and idols, and all the abominations that were seen in the land of Judah and in Jerusalem. He did this to carry out the words of the law written in the book that Hilkiah the priest had found in the house of the LORD.
2 Kings 23:24BSB

This is the one verse that records the removal of the figures from the land.

For idols speak deceit and diviners see illusions; they tell false dreams and offer empty comfort. Therefore the people wander like sheep, oppressed for lack of a shepherd.
Zechariah 10:2BSB

Zechariah, prophesying after the exile, still names the figures as a cause of Israel's wandering.

For the Israelites must live many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or sacred pillar, and without ephod or idol.
Hosea 3:4BSB

Hosea's list joins the figures to the ephod, as Micah's shrine had joined them.

Henry ends his note on the verse with a warning about the loss of public worship.

“They shall have no sacrifice or altar (so the LXX.), and therefore no sacrifice because no altar. They shall have no ephod, nor teraphim, no legal priesthood, no means of knowing God's mind, no oracle to consult in doubtful cases, but shall be all in the dark. Note, The case of those is very melancholy that are deprived of all opportunities to worship God in public.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible · on Hosea 3:4Puritan

Two Voices on the Teraphim

Ambrose of Milan and Jamieson, Fausset & Brown each comment on Genesis 31.

Ambrose of Milan read the scene in Laban's tent as an allegory of the church.

“Moreover, holy Rachel—that is, the church, or prudence—hid the idols, because the church does not know representations and figures of idols that are totally devoid of reality, but it knows the real existence of the Trinity. Indeed, it has destroyed darkness and revealed the splendor of glory.”

Ambrose of Milan · Flight from the World 5.27 · on Genesis 31:34Patristic

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown weigh Laban's two charges against Jacob and find the second the graver.

“Considering the past conduct of Laban, his complaint on this ground was hypocritical cant. But his second charge was a grave one--the carrying off his gods--Hebrew, ‘teraphim,’ small images of human figures, used not as idols or objects of worship, but as talismans, for superstitious purposes.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible · on Genesis 31:26 to 30Reformed

What the Teraphim Were

The teraphim are read as household gods, as ancestor figures or as tokens of family leadership, and only the third reading gives a reason for Rachel's theft.

Household gods kept for omensJohn Gill; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, in their Commentary Critical and Explanatory on Ezekiel 21:21, call the teraphim household gods worshipped as family talismans, to learn the future.

John Gill, in his Exposition of the Old Testament on 1 Samuel 19:13, likens them to the penates, the household gods of the heathen.

He also reports Aben Ezra's view that they were figures made under a constellation and consulted to foretell things to come.

The objection: Genesis 31 shows no one consulting the figures.

Figures of the family's forefathersKarel van der Toorn

Karel van der Toorn, in The Nature of the Biblical Teraphim in the Light of the Cuneiform Evidence (1990), reads the teraphim as figures of the family's dead forefathers.

2 Kings 23:24 lists the teraphim with the mediums and spiritists, and Deuteronomy 18:11 sets mediums and spiritists beside inquiry of the dead.

The objection: no verse that names the teraphim names a forefather, and the verses that show their use show them consulted for an omen.

Leadership of the family, read from the Nuzi tabletsCyrus H. Gordon; E. A. Speiser

Cyrus H. Gordon and E. A. Speiser read the tablets from Nuzi, near Kirkuk, as parallels to the customs of Laban's household.

Gordon set out the reading in 1940, in Biblical Customs and the Nuzu Tablets, from a tablet in which only a begotten son takes his father's gods.

He held that possession of the gods may have implied leadership of the family, a right that passed to Laban's own sons once they were born.

And Rachel and Leah replied, “Do we have any portion or inheritance left in our father’s house? Are we not regarded by him as outsiders? Not only has he sold us, but he has certainly squandered what was paid for us. Surely all the wealth that God has taken away from our father belongs to us and to our children. So do whatever God has told you.”
Genesis 31:14 to 16BSB

The sisters' complaint shows that inheritance was in dispute in Laban's house when Rachel took the figures.

The objection: Moshe Greenberg questioned the reading in Another Look at Rachel's Theft of the Teraphim (1962).

Thomas L. Thompson, in The Historicity of the Patriarchal Narratives (1974), and John Van Seters, in Abraham in History and Tradition (1975), argued that the Nuzi parallels had been overstated and in places misread.

Works on the Teraphim

A commentary on Genesis and two journal articles that argue what the teraphim were.

Genesis (Anchor Bible)

E. A. Speiser · 1964

Speiser's commentary carried the Nuzi reading of Genesis 29 to 31 to a wide readership.

In print: find it wherever books are sold.

Another Look at Rachel's Theft of the Teraphim

Moshe Greenberg · 1962

The article stands in volume 81 of the Journal of Biblical Literature, from page 239.

In print: find it wherever books are sold.

The Nature of the Biblical Teraphim in the Light of the Cuneiform Evidence

Karel van der Toorn · 1990

The article stands on pages 203 to 222 of volume 52 of the Catholic Biblical Quarterly.

In print: find it wherever books are sold.

Seeking the LORD Their God

Afterward, the people of Israel will return and seek the LORD their God and David their king. They will come trembling to the LORD and to His goodness in the last days.
Hosea 3:5BSB

This promise follows directly on the loss of the teraphim in Hosea 3:4.

John Wesley, on Hosea 3:5, reads David their king as the Messiah, the son of David.

And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know Him who is true; and we are in Him who is true—in His Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life. Little children, keep yourselves from idols.
1 John 5:20 to 21BSB

These are the last words of John's first letter, which ends on the same choice Hosea 3:4 to 5 sets out.

Berean Standard Bible. The Hebrew words of the fifteen verses that use teraphim, STEP Bible tagged text (CC BY 4.0). Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, 1871. Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832. Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old Testament. John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament. Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710. John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament, 1765. Ambrose of Milan, Flight from the World 5.27. Jerome, Hebrew Questions on Genesis, on Genesis 31:19. Rashi on Genesis 35:2, translated by M. Rosenbaum and A. M. Silbermann, 1929 to 1934, public domain. Rashi on Judges 17:5, The Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J. (CC BY). Rashi on II Kings 23:24, The Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J. (CC BY). MannaFest, Haran, the place page: the Nuzi tablets and the debate over them, citing E. A. Speiser, Genesis (Anchor Bible, 1964); Thomas L. Thompson, The Historicity of the Patriarchal Narratives (1974); John Van Seters, Abraham in History and Tradition (1975). Cyrus H. Gordon, Biblical Customs and the Nuzu Tablets, The Biblical Archaeologist 3, no. 1 (February 1940), 1 to 12. Karel van der Toorn, The Nature of the Biblical Teraphim in the Light of the Cuneiform Evidence, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 52 (1990), 203 to 222. Moshe Greenberg, Another Look at Rachel's Theft of the Teraphim, Journal of Biblical Literature 81 (1962), 239 to 248. Theodore J. Lewis, Teraphim, in Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, second edition, edited by Karel van der Toorn, Bob Becking and Pieter W. van der Horst (Leiden: Brill; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999), 844 to 850. Every cited work: the sources registry →