Deuteronomychapter 4
49 verses · Moses, by tradition · 15th to 13th century BC · The Law
But the Lord hath taken you, and brought you forth out of the iron furnace, even out of Egypt, to be unto him a people of inheritance, as ye are this day.
Introduction
Moses, by tradition, The Law, Deuteronomy Overview.
This chapter closes Moses' first address and turns history into an argument. He speaks to a people about to enter a land full of carved gods and household shrines. He wants them to remember what they saw at Horeb and what they did not see. The chapter looks forward as well as back, to a day of exile and a way home. Listen for the questions Moses asks about other nations and other gods. Listen also for the reason he gives for the law's wisdom. Read it as the ground on which the whole second address stands.
Context
- Who
- A generation who had heard about Horeb and had not stood there as adults
- What
- The close of Moses' first address, which calls Israel to keep the law and forbids every image of God, followed by the naming of three cities of refuge.
- Where
- The valley opposite Beth-peor, east of the Jordan, where Israel had fallen into the worship of Baal of Peor.
- When
- The fortieth year after the exodus, about 1406 BC on the traditional dating, or late in the thirteenth century BC on the later dating, with the heading at the end of the chapter opening the second address.
- Why
- To keep Israel from idolatry by grounding worship in what they heard at Horeb, and to promise mercy after the exile that idolatry would bring.
Historical context
Moses is the speaker and this is the end of his first address. He speaks as the man who stood on the mountain, who received the ten words, and who has just told the people three times that he will not cross the river with them.
Show the rest of the historical context, 5 more paragraphs
The place is named in the heading at verses 44 to 46, the valley opposite Beth-peor in the land Sihon had held. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown observe that a temple of that idol probably stood in full view of the camp while Moses pressed the exclusive claims of God on Israel's worship, which is the ground of the plague named at verse 3.
A first hearer knew what the warning at verse 2 was. A clause forbidding anyone to add to a document or take from it is a standing feature of second millennium treaty texts, which is part of the correspondence Meredith G. Kline and Kenneth A. Kitchen build on. Copies were deposited and read, and altering the text called the curses of the agreement down on the one who did it.
A first hearer also knew what an image was for. Every nation around Israel housed its gods in carved form. Adam Clarke names Baal-peor and Astarte for the likeness of male and female, the Egyptian Apis worshipped as a white bull, the ibis and the hawk among the birds, serpents and the crocodile among the creeping things, and John Gill adds Dagon and Derceto among the Phoenicians. The image was where the god was thought to be present and fed. Israel heard a voice out of fire and was given no shape to keep.
The iron furnace of verse 20 is a working object. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown record that it means a furnace for smelting iron, round, sometimes thirty feet deep and needing the highest intensity of heat, which is the picture Egypt is given.
The three cities at the end were sanctuaries for a man who killed someone by accident, protection from the relative whose duty it was to avenge the death before any trial could be held. Bezer stood on the Reubenite plateau, Ramoth in Gilead and Golan in Bashan.
Significance
Their neighbours would ask an obvious question, where the statue of their God was and what it looked like. This chapter gives them the answer to give, no form and only a voice, together with a law the nations would call wise.
Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph
The scattering it foretells was spoken before they had crossed the river, and it named the end of idolatry in advance. The promise attached to it is the one Jeremiah 29:13 repeats to exiles in almost the same words, that they would seek and find when they searched with all their heart.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
What is done
The command against adding to the law or taking from it is read in the tradition as a rule over the shape of the practice itself. Rashi on Deuteronomy 4:2:1 gives the examples: to place five chapters in the Tephillin, to use five species of fruit and plants for the Lulab, and to put five fringes on a garment. Each example is an addition to a fixed count, and Rashi holds that the same verse forbids diminishing in the same way, citing Sifrei Devarim 82:4. The counts a Jewish household keeps at the arm, in the hand at the feast and on the corners of a garment rest on that rule.
How it is read
The classical commentary reads this chapter as the charge to learn and to guard. Rashi on Deuteronomy 4:6:1 takes the command to watch as the study of the laws, from Sifrei Devarim 58. Rashi on Deuteronomy 4:14:1 reads the teaching Moses was commanded to give as the Oral Law. The pairing is the tradition's own account of why a written Torah arrives with a body of instruction beside it. Rashi on Deuteronomy 4:9:1 holds that the people are accounted wise and understanding while they keep the things in their correct manner. Doing them wrongly through forgetfulness makes them foolish. Sforno on Deuteronomy 4:15:1 reads the ban on any form seen at Horeb against a school of philosophers. He describes them as holding that beyond the celestial bodies there is nothing more substantial or influential, and nothing older. Rashi on Deuteronomy 4:24:1 glosses the jealous God as jealous to take vengeance on those who worship idols. The Rashi entries are from the corpus entries marked kept, the Rosenbaum and Silbermann edition, public domain. The Sforno entries are from Eliyahu Munk's HaChut Hameshulash, CC-BY. Ibn Ezra stands across this chapter as a linked entry, at Ibn Ezra on Deuteronomy 4:1:1, 4:3:1, 4:5:1, 4:7:1, 4:11:1 and 4:12:1, cited by ref alone. Malbim on Deuteronomy 4:13:1 is linked in the same way.
What the rabbis say
The rabbis read a date out of the letters of a single word. Rashi on Deuteronomy 4:25:1 holds that the word for growing old in the land carries the number 852, and that it hinted at exile after 852 years in the land. He then holds that God brought the exile two years early, at 850, so that the sentence of utter perishing in the next verse should not fall on them. Rashi reads Daniel 9:14 as the account of that mercy, and cites Sanhedrin 38a and Gittin 88a. This site reports the reckoning as what the rabbis taught. The corpus also holds the Midrash and the Talmud on this chapter as locators without their text. Among them are Avodah Zarah 4b:16 at verse 6, Devarim Rabbah 2:13 at verse 8 and Avot DeRabbi Natan 24:7 at verse 9. Others are Berakhot 32b:30 at verse 15, Avodah Zarah 54b:18 at verse 24, Devarim Rabbah 2:19 at verse 25 and Kohelet Rabbah 3:8:2 at verse 29.
Sources: Rashi, Rashi on Deuteronomy 4:2:1, 4:6:1, 4:9:1, 4:14:1, 4:24:1 and 4:25:1, Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary by M. Rosenbaum and A. M. Silbermann, public domain, 1929 to 1934; Sforno, Sforno on Deuteronomy 4:4:1 and 4:15:1, Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash, CC-BY; Ibn Ezra, Ibn Ezra on Deuteronomy 4:1:1, 4:3:1, 4:5:1, 4:7:1, 4:11:1 and 4:12:1, cited by ref alone, CC-BY-NC; Malbim, Malbim on Deuteronomy 4:13:1, cited by ref alone, no English version; Midrash and Talmud, Avodah Zarah 4b:16, Devarim Rabbah 2:13, Avot DeRabbi Natan 24:7, Berakhot 32b:30, Avodah Zarah 54b:18, Devarim Rabbah 2:19 and Kohelet Rabbah 3:8:2, cited by ref alone; The Sefaria corpus on disk, scripts/data/sources/sefaria/deuteronomy/4.json, fetched 2026-09-19, 2026.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
What nation has statutes like these?
Deuteronomy 4:1-2
Verse 2 forbids Israel to "add to or subtract from" the commands, as 12:32, Proverbs 30:6 and Revelation 22:18-19 also do. Such a ban is standard in second millennium treaties, and Meredith Kline (Treaty of the Great King) and Kenneth Kitchen (On the Reliability of the Old Testament) read Deuteronomy on that pattern. Readers who date the book to the seventh century disagree.
Deuteronomy 4:1
“The statutes - The laws which concern the worship and service of God. The judgments - The laws concerning your duties to men. So these two comprehend both tables, and the whole law of God.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The purpose clause gives the reason for the guard: the commandments can be kept only if they reach Israel as God gave them. Matthew Henry reports that the Jews read the verse as forbidding any change to the letter of the law, and he credits their care with the purity of the Hebrew text. Adam Clarke extends it to any comment that would weaken what was revealed.
Deuteronomy 4:2
“The Jews understand it as prohibiting the alteration of the text or letter of the law, even in the least jot or tittle; and to their great care and exactness herein we are very much indebted, under God, for the purity and integrity of the Hebrew code.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Deuteronomy 4:3-4
Your eyes have seen what the Lord did: The event is Numbers 25, where Israel joined the Baal of Peor at Shittim and twenty-four thousand died in the plague. Moses chooses the most recent judgment, so the evidence is the people's own memory. Verse 4 divides the crowd by who "held fast to the LORD your God," and the survivors "are alive to this day, every one of you."
Deuteronomy 4:3
“Your eyes have seen what the Lord did because of Baalpeor,.... Because of the idolatry the people of Israel fell into by worshipping that idol, being drawn into it by the daughters of Moab and Midian, through the counsel of Balaam, with whom they committed fornication; which led them to the other sin, and both highly provoking to God.”
The survivors of Baal-peor are the evidence Moses offers. The verb for holding fast is the one Genesis 2:24 uses of a man joined to his wife, and Deuteronomy uses it again at 10:20 and 30:20 for Israel's loyalty to God. John Gill, on verse 3, traces the fall at Peor to the daughters of Moab and Midian and the counsel of Balaam.
Deuteronomy 4:5-6
Keeping the statutes "will show your wisdom and understanding in the sight of the peoples," so Moses gives the law an audience beyond Israel. The nations are expected to judge Israel by how it lives, and their verdict, "Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people," is given in advance. At 1 Kings 10:6-9 the queen of Sheba says much the same over Solomon's house.
The wisdom lies in the doing, and the nations judge Israel from what they hear of its laws. Matthew Henry reads obedience as agreeable to right reason and to Israel's own interest, and links it to Job 28, where the fear of the Lord is wisdom. Adam Clarke calls Israel's worship the one wise and reasonable service on earth at that time.
Deuteronomy 4:6
“Keep - and do them; for this is your wisdom - There was no mode of worship at this time on the face or the earth that was not wicked, obscene, puerile, foolish, or ridiculous, except that established by God himself among the Israelites. And every part of this, taken in its connection and reference, may be truly called a wise and reasonable service.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
2 more voices on this verse
Deuteronomy 4:6
“In keeping God's commandments, [1.] They would act wisely for themselves; It is not only agreeable to right reason, but highly conducive to our true interest; this is one of the first and most ancient maxims of divine revelation. The fear of the Lord, that is wisdom, Job xxviii.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Deuteronomy 4:6
“And particularly the old Heathen oracle expressly said, that the Chaldeans or Hebrew, who worshipped the uncreated God, were the only wise men.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
Deuteronomy 4:7-8
Two questions carry the argument, each opening with "what nation is great enough" to match Israel. The first answer is nearness, a god "as near to them as the LORD our God is to us," so what Israel has and the nations lack is access. The second answer is the law itself, "righteous statutes and ordinances," offered as evidence about the God who gave it.
Deuteronomy 4:7
“Not so much for their number, for they were the fewest of all people; nor for the largeness of their territories, for the land they were going to possess was but a small country; nor for their wealth and riches, and warlike exploits, though they were not contemptible in either; but for their happy constitution in church and state, being directed and governed in both by laws which came immediately from God himself; for their knowledge of divine things, and for spiritual blessings and privileges they were favoured with, of which a special instance is given: who hath God so…”
3 more voices on this verse
Deuteronomy 4:7
“The former, their national advantages, are described (De 4:7, 8), and they were twofold: 1. God's readiness to hear and aid them at all times; and 2. the excellence of that religion in which they were instructed, set forth in the "statutes and judgments so righteous" which the law of Moses contained.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Deuteronomy 4:7
“Secondly, Those that call upon God shall certainly find him within call, and ready to give an answer of peace to every prayer of faith; see Isa. lviii. 9 , " Thou shalt cry, as the child for a nurse, and he shall say, Here I am, what does my dear child cry for?" Thirdly, This is a privilege which makes the Israel of God truly great and honourable.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Deuteronomy 4:7
“So nigh - By glorious miracles, by the pledges of his special presence, by the operations of his grace, and particularly by his readiness to hear our prayers, and to give us those succors which we call upon him for.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The second question measures a nation's greatness by the justice of its laws, and it takes in this entire law as one body. John Wesley draws from it that the true greatness of a nation lies in the righteousness of its laws, over pomp, power or empire. John Gill notes that Moses was setting the law afresh before a new generation almost forty years after Sinai.
Deuteronomy 4:8
“And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgments so righteous,.... Founded in justice and equity, and so agreeable to right reason, and so well calculated and adapted to lead persons in the ways of righteousness and truth, and keep them from doing any injury to each other's persons and properties, and to maintain good order, peace, and concord among them: as all this law which I set before you this day? which he then repeated, afresh declared, explained and instructed them in; for otherwise it had been delivered to them near forty years ago.”
2 more voices on this verse
Deuteronomy 4:8
“This also was the grandeur of Israel above any people. What nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgments so righteous? Observe, First, That all these statutes and judgments of the divine law are infinitely just and righteous, above the statutes and judgments of any of the nations.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Deuteronomy 4:8
“So righteous - Whereby he implies that the true greatness of a nation doth not consist in pomp or power, or largeness of empire, as commonly men think, but in the righteousness of its laws.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
You saw no form, you only heard a voice
Deuteronomy 4:9-10
Verse 9 warns Israel not to "forget the things your eyes have seen," and the guard is teaching "your children and grandchildren," the same span chapter 6 opens with. Verse 10 fixes the remembered day at Horeb. God's purpose there was that the people "may learn to fear Me all the days they live on the earth, and that they may teach them to their children."
Deuteronomy 4:9
“A full stop should end Deu 4:9; and Deu 4:10 begin, At the time that thou stoodest, etc. Deu 4:11 then ye came near, etc. Moses, exhorting to heedful observance of the Law, strives to renew the impressions of that tremendous scene which attended its promulgation at Sinai.”
The day at Horeb is recalled as an assembly God called so that the people would hear his words. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown observe that some of Moses' hearers had been present as children, and the rest were represented by their parents, who entered the covenant in their name. Matthew Henry holds that the attention compelled at Sinai should afterward be won by the worth of the words themselves.
Deuteronomy 4:11-12
What the people saw was fire and darkness, "a mountain blazing with fire to the heavens," and the weight falls on what they did not see. They "heard the sound of the words, but saw no form," and verse 15 makes that the ground of the argument against images. Exodus 19:16-19 tells the same scene with thunder, a thick cloud and the ram's horn growing louder.
Deuteronomy 4:11
“Fires in the night are the most frightful, and the fire made the darkness that surrounded it look the more awful; for it must needs be a strong darkness which such a fire did not disperse. In allusion to this appearance upon Mount Sinai, God is said to show himself for his people, and against his and their enemies, in fire and darkness together, Ps. xviii.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The LORD spoke out of the fire, and what Israel carried away from the encounter was his words. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that articulate speech was heard while no shape appeared that could show God's nature in the way the heathen pictured their gods. Albert Barnes sets out the forms idolatry took, household images, animal figures and the stars, and finds each forbidden in verses 16 to 19.
Deuteronomy 4:13-14
The King James renders the Hebrew phrase ten words as ten commandments, and the phrase falls three times, here and at Exodus 34:28 and Deuteronomy 10:4. Verse 13 marks off what God spoke and wrote himself "on two tablets of stone" from the statutes that verse 14 says Moses was to teach. The ten are set apart by who delivered them, and chapter 5 repeats them in full.
Moses states his commission here, and he names the land across the Jordan as the place where what he teaches is to be kept. The same pairing of statutes and ordinances opened the chapter at verse 1, where Jamieson, Fausset and Brown take the statutes as the laws of worship and the ordinances as the civil laws.
Our God is a consuming fire
Deuteronomy 4:15-18
Verse 15 argues from the absence of a form: the people "saw no form of any kind," so an image would picture something God did not show. The list runs down from "male or female" through beast, bird and crawling creature to fish, retracing the order of Genesis 1. Paul traces the same descent at Romans 1:23, "images of mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles."
Deuteronomy 4:15
“Ye saw no manner of similitude - Howsoever God chose to appear or manifest himself, he took care never to assume any describable form. He would have no image worship, because he is a Spirit, and they who worship him must worship him in Spirit and in truth. These outward things tend to draw the mind out of itself, and diffuse it on sensible, if not sensual, objects; and thus spiritual worship is prevented, and the Holy Ghost grieved. Persons acting in this way can never know much of the religion of the heart.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Making an image is called acting corruptly, so the offence is reckoned as ruin to the one who makes it. Matthew Henry reasons that those who picture God form notions of him that open the way to every impiety, and he calls it spiritual adultery. Adam Clarke names the male and female deities of the neighbouring peoples, Baal-peor and Astarte among them.
Deuteronomy 4:16
“The likeness of male or female - Such as Baal-peor and the Roman Priapus, Ashtaroth or Astarte, and the Greek and Roman Venus; after whom most nations of the world literally went a whoring.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Deuteronomy 4:16
“This was particularly the case with the Canaanites and Egyptians, against whose superstitious practices the caution, no doubt, was chiefly directed. The former worshipped Baal and Astarte, the latter Osiris and Isis, under the figure of a male and a female.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
The list moves from the human form of verse 16 to the animals of land and air, so no living creature is left as a lawful likeness of God. Adam Clarke names Apis, worshipped in Egypt as a white bull, and the ibis and hawk among birds. John Gill adds the sheep honoured at Thebes and the goat at Mendes.
Deuteronomy 4:17
“The likeness of any beast, etc. - Such as the Egyptian god Apis, who was worshipped under the form of a white bull; the ibis and hawk, among the fowls, had also Divine honors paid to them; serpents and the crocodile among reptiles; besides monkeys, dogs, cats, the scarabaeus, leeks, and onions! See this explained at large, Exo 20:4 (note).”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The list ends with the creatures that crawl and the fish in the waters, which carries the prohibition from the ground to the depths. John Gill finds the serpent in almost every heathen worship and traces it to the serpent of Eden. He also names Dagon and Derceto, fish figures among the Phoenicians, and 1 Samuel 5 shows Dagon among the Philistines.
Deuteronomy 4:18
“The likeness of anything that creepeth on the ground,.... As serpents by many; and indeed that creature is introduced into almost all the idolatries of the Heathens, which seems to take its rise from the serpent Satan made use of to deceive our first parents: the likeness of any fish that is in the waters beneath the earth; as the crocodile and hippopotamus, or river horse, by the Egyptians; and Dagon and Derceto, supposed to be figures in the form of a fish, among the Phoenicians.”
Deuteronomy 4:19-20
Verse 19 says the sun, moon and stars are "apportioned to all the nations," while verse 20 makes Israel "the people of His inheritance" instead. Some read the apportioning as God giving every nation the lights to mark seasons, as at Genesis 1:14. Others, with Michael Heiser the best known recent advocate, read it beside 32:8 as an allotment of the nations themselves to other powers.
Deuteronomy 4:19
“It is clear then that since those who live according to the law reverence the One who made the heaven, they do not reverence the heaven as if God. Furthermore, none of those who serve the Mosaic law worship the angels in heaven. And in the same way that they do not worship the sun, moon, and stars and "the world of heaven." They avoid worshiping heaven as such or the angels in it.”
Origen of Alexandria · written before 253 · AGAINST CELSUS 5.6patristic
1 more voice on this verse
Deuteronomy 4:19
“It is absurd to worship them, for they are man's servants, were made and ordained to give light on earth; and shall we serve those that were made to serve us? The sun, in Hebrew is called shemesh, which signifies a servant, for it is the minister-general of this visible world, and holds the candle to all mankind; let it not then be worshipped as a lord.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
ConnectionsJob 38:32
out of the iron furnace: Verse 19 spoke of what the LORD apportioned to the nations, and this verse speaks of the people he took as his own inheritance, with the crowd before Moses as the proof. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown explain the furnace as a furnace for smelting iron, which required the highest heat. Adam Clarke infers from the phrase that Israel laboured at metalwork in Egypt.
Deuteronomy 4:20
“But the Lord hath taken you, and brought you forth out of the iron furnace--that is, furnace for smelting iron. A furnace of this kind is round, sometimes thirty feet deep, and requiring the highest intensity of heat.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Deuteronomy 4:21-22
This is the third time Moses gives the reason he cannot cross, after 1:37 and 3:26, each time saying the LORD was angry on the people's account. Numbers 20:12 gives the reason from the other side, "Because you did not trust Me," and neither book reconciles the two. Verse 22 states the outcome plainly, "I must die in this land," then turns to the people's future.
Deuteronomy 4:21
“Furthermore the Lord was angry with me for your sakes,.... See Deu 3:26, and sware that I should not go over Jordan; this circumstance of swearing is nowhere else expressed: and that I should not go in unto that good land; the land of Canaan; he might see it, as he did from Pisgah, but not enter into it: which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance; to them and to their children after them.”
I must die in this land: Moses sets his own exclusion beside Israel's entry in one verse, and the contrast between I and you prepares the warning of verse 23. John Gill points ahead to 32:50, where Moses dies on a mountain in Moab, and reads the second half as his confidence in God's promise. Matthew Henry, on verse 21, thinks Moses spoke of it to see whether the people would grieve for their leader.
Deuteronomy 4:22
“But I must die in this land,.... The land of Moab, in a mountain in it he died, and in a valley there he was buried, Deu 32:50, I must not go over Jordan; this he repeats, as lying near his heart; he had earnestly solicited to go over, but was denied it: but ye shall go over, and possess that good land; this he firmly believed and assures them of, relying on the promise and faithfulness of God.”
Deuteronomy 4:23-24
Forgetting returns at verse 23, and what could be forgotten is the covenant itself. Jealous is the word God used of himself in the second commandment at Exodus 20:5, and the fire that spoke at Horeb in verse 12 is said to be what he is. Hebrews 12:29 closes an argument about "an unshakable kingdom" by carrying verse 24 over as "For our God is a consuming fire."
Deuteronomy 4:23
“But, upon the whole, it is evident that religion has reason on its side, the powerful charms of which all that are irreligious wilfully stop their ears against. (1.) He urges the greatness, glory, and goodness, of God. Did we consider what a God he is with whom we have to do, we should surely make conscience of our duty to him and not dare to sin against him.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The verse grounds the warning of verse 23 in what God is, and it joins two titles, the fire that consumes and the jealousy that will share his worship with no image. Matthew Henry draws from the jealousy that Israel should keep a watchful jealousy over itself. Origen of Alexandria reads the fire as consuming human sins and purging them.
Deuteronomy 4:24
“Thy God is a consuming fire - They had seen him on the mount as an unconsuming fire, while appearing to Moses, and giving the law; and they had seen him as a consuming fire in the case of Korah, Dathan, Abiram, and their company. They had, therefore, every good to expect from his approbation, and every evil to dread from his displeasure.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Deuteronomy 4:24
“So the prophets called him a burning fire, because in those three points we see more intensely the majesty of the Godhead. Since to sanctify is of the Godhead, to illuminate is the property of fire and light, and the Godhead is frequently pointed out or seen in the appearance of fire: "For our God is a consuming fire," as Moses said.”
Ambrose of Milan · written before 397 · On the Holy Spirit 1.14.140patristic
Scattered, and yet found again
Deuteronomy 4:25-26
Moses calls "heaven and earth as witnesses against you this day," as a treaty does when no higher court exists, and he repeats the call at 30:19, 31:28 and 32:1. The offence he foresees comes when "you have been in the land a long time," so the danger belongs to security. The phrase this day falls seventy times in the book, keeping the covenant present for every hearer.
Deuteronomy 4:25
“Compare with these verses Lev 26:33-40, and Deu 28:64 ff.”
The threat reverses the promise that closes the chapter, since the land where verse 40 promises long life is the land where Israel would not live long. Basil of Caesarea reads the summons of heaven and earth as fitting, since every deed is done within them and they will be present at the judgment. Adam Clarke calls it a solemn form of oath used among all nations.
Deuteronomy 4:26
“I call heaven and earth to witness against you - A most solemn method of adjuration, in use among all nations in the world.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Deuteronomy 4:26
And not only Paul, but generally all those to whom is committed any ministry of the word, never cease from testifying, but call heaven and earth to witness on the ground that now every deed that is done is done within them, and that in the examination of all the actions of life they will be present with the judged. So it is said, "He shall call to the heavens above and to earth, that he may judge his people."
Basil of Caesarea · written before 379 · ON THE SPIRIT 13.30patristic
Deuteronomy 4:27-28
The sentence is exile, and verse 28 fits it to the offence: a people who wanted an image are sent to serve "man-made gods of wood and stone" in a country full of them. The four things those gods "cannot see or hear or eat or smell" are what an idol would need to be what its makers want. Psalm 115:4-8 and Isaiah 44:9-20 expand the same list.
Deuteronomy 4:27
“The Lord shall scatter you among the nations - This was amply verified in their different captivities and dispersions.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Verse 19 warned against the stars, which God made, and here the gods are the work of human hands, a lower thing still. John Gill draws that comparison and calls the service of wood and stone more senseless than the worship of the heavens. John Wesley reads the verse as God giving men over to the sin they chose, so that one sin is punished by another.
Deuteronomy 4:29-31
A promise to the scattered follows the threat, "you will find Him if you seek Him with all your heart and with all your soul," the language of 6:5. They are offered what the covenant asked at the start, and Jeremiah 29:13 repeats the promise to exiles. Verse 31 grounds it in God's character, "a merciful God" who will not "forget the covenant with your fathers."
Deuteronomy 4:29
“If from thence thou seek the Lord - Whatever place we are in, we may from thence seek him. There is no part of the earth which has a gulf fixt between it and heaven.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The return is placed in distress, after all these things have happened, and it ends where Horeb began, with Israel listening to his voice. Matthew Henry holds that afflictions are sent to bring people back to God. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown give two readings of the later days, the close of the captivities or the age of the Messiah, and leave both open.
Deuteronomy 4:30
“When thou art in tribulation in the latter days - Are not these the times spoken of? And is there not still hope for Israel?”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
a merciful God;): The hope of verse 30 rests on God's character, stated as three things he will never do: abandon Israel, destroy it, or forget the oath he swore to the fathers. Matthew Henry turns the verse back on the hearer and asks whether Israel will forsake a God who will never forsake them, or forget a covenant he keeps in mind.
Deuteronomy 4:31
“Shall we forsake a merciful God, who will never forsake us, as it follows here, if we be faithful unto him? Whither can we go to better ourselves? Shall we forget the covenant of our God, who will not forget the covenant of our fathers?”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Ask from the day God created man
Deuteronomy 4:32-33
Moses sets no limit on the search, reaching back to "the day that God created man on earth" and across "from one end of the heavens to the other" for evidence. The claim tested is narrow and checkable, that a whole people "heard the voice of God speaking out of the fire" and lived. Exodus 20:19 records their plea for Moses to speak instead, and 5:24-26 repeats it.
Deuteronomy 4:32
“This singular honour done them called for singular obedience from them. It might justly be expected that they should do more for God than other people, since God had done so much more for them.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The weight of the question falls on its last words, and lived, since hearing God was expected to end in death. Adam Clarke reports the general belief that God appeared to men to destroy them, and sees this appearing as given for Israel's deliverance. John Gill counts it the stranger wonder that a people who feared being consumed were spared.
Deuteronomy 4:33
“Did ever people hear the voice of God - It seems to have been a general belief that if God appeared to men, it was for the purpose of destroying them; and indeed most of the extraordinary manifestations of God were in the way of judgment; but here it was different; God did appear in a sovereign and extraordinary manner; but it was for the deliverance and support of the people. 1. They heard his voice speaking with them in a distinct, articulate manner.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Deuteronomy 4:34-35
The second question moves from hearing to rescue, a nation taken "out of another nation" by seven means ending at "great terrors" in Egypt. Verse 35 states the purpose of the demonstration, that Israel "would know that the LORD is God" and that there is no other. The signs point beyond themselves, and at 1 Kings 18:39 the people on Carmel answer Elijah with the same confession.
Deuteronomy 4:34
“From the midst of another nation - This was a most extraordinary thing, that a whole people, consisting of upwards of 600,000 effective men, besides women and children, should, without striking a blow, be brought out of the midst of a very powerful nation, to the political welfare of which their services were so essential; that they should be brought out in so open and public a manner; that the sea itself should be supernaturally divided to afford this mighty host a passage; and that, in a desert utterly unfriendly to human life, they should be sustained for forty years.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Deuteronomy 4:34
“By temptations - Temptations is the general title, which is explained by the following particulars, signs, and wonders, &c. which are called temptations, because they were trials both to the Egyptians and Israelites, whether they would be induced to believe and obey God or no.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
The signs of verse 34 were shown to Israel so that Israel would know, which makes the people witnesses of what they saw. John Gill reads the verse as the confession that the LORD is the one living and true God, and notes that the Prophet Isaiah often uses the same phrase for the same article of faith. Isaiah 45:5 has it on God's own lips.
Deuteronomy 4:35
“Unto thee it was showed,.... What the Lord did in Egypt: that thou mightest know that the Lord he is God, there is none else besides him; that he is the one only living and true God, and there is no other: this phrase is often used by the Prophet Isaiah, to express the same great article of faith.”
Deuteronomy 4:36-38
Verse 36 joins the voice "from heaven" and the "great fire" on earth, and gives "to discipline you" as their purpose. Verse 37 dates the choice to the patriarchs, "Because He loved your fathers, He chose their descendants after them," so the generation delivered did not earn it. Verse 38 names three aims: driving out greater nations, bringing Israel in, and giving it their land.
The words by His presence render a Hebrew phrase built on the word for face, and Exodus 33:14 uses the same word when God promises that his presence will go with Moses. Albert Barnes notes that the Hebrew reads his seed after him, and takes Moses to have Abraham in mind, whom James 2:23 calls the friend of God.
The closing words, as it is this day, point to the land east of the Jordan already taken from Sihon and Og, a first instalment of the promise. Matthew Henry observes that the Egyptians and the Canaanites alike had to give way to Israel, and that those who stood in Israel's way did so at their peril.
Deuteronomy 4:38
“If we rightly understand the matter, this is the statement of Moses at the beginning of his book: "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." For this is the beginning of all creation; to this beginning the end and consummation of all things must be recalled, in order that this heaven and this earth may be the habitation and resting place of the pious. So all the holy ones and the meek obtain an inheritance in that land, since this is the teaching of the Law and the Prophets and the Gospels.”
Origen of Alexandria · written before 253 · ON FIRST PRINCIPLES 3.6.8patristic
1 more voice on this verse
Deuteronomy 4:38
“Egyptians and Canaanites must both be sacrificed to Israel's honour and interest. Those that stand in Israel's light, in Israel's way, shall find it is at their peril. (7.) He urges God's righteous appearance against them sometimes for their sins.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Deuteronomy 4:39-40
Verse 39 asks for more than assent, "Know therefore this day and take to heart," and names the LORD as God in heaven above and on earth below. Jewish liturgy has closed the Aleinu prayer with this clause for centuries. Verse 40 adds the consequence, "so that you and your children after you may prosper," and ends where verse 1 began, on statutes to be kept.
The address ends with a command and a promise bound together, and the land is said to be given for all time. Matthew Henry reads the condition plainly, that Israel's prosperity would depend on its piety and that God would keep his promises if they kept his precepts. He asks what laws are made for if they are never observed and obeyed.
Three cities of refuge east of Jordan
Deuteronomy 4:41-43
The address pauses for narrative, as Moses sets aside the three cities of refuge east of the Jordan out of the six that Numbers 35:9-15 required. The protection is narrow, for one who killed "his neighbor unintentionally without prior malice," and Joshua 20:8 names the same three. Bezer, Ramoth and Golan fall to Reuben, Gad and Manasseh, one to each tribe of the east bank.
Deuteronomy 4:41
“These verses are inserted between two distinct and complete discourses for the reason to which they themselves call attention (“Then Moses severed three cities,” etc.); i. e., the fact narrated took place historically after Moses spoke the one discourse and before he delivered the other. In thus severing the three cities of refuge Moses carried out a previous command of God (see the marginal references); and so followed up his exhortations to obedience by setting a punctual example of it, as far as opportunity was given him.”
The refuge is for one who killed without intent and without earlier hatred, and its purpose is to save his life from the avenger of blood that Numbers 35:12 names. Albert Barnes, on verse 41, reads the setting apart of these cities as Moses following his exhortations to obedience with a punctual example of it.
Ramoth in Gilead: The three cities run from south to north, Bezer on the plateau of Reuben, Ramoth in Gilead of Gad, and Golan in Bashan of Manasseh. Adam Clarke reports that the cities of refuge are commonly read as types of the salvation Christ provides for sinners. He also supposes that the last nine verses of the chapter were added by Joshua or Ezra.
Deuteronomy 4:43
“Bezer in the wilderness - As the cities of refuge are generally understood to be types of the salvation provided by Christ for sinners; so their names have been thought to express some attribute of the Redeemer of mankind. See them explained Jos 20:7-8 (note). I Suppose the last nine verses of this chapter to have been added by either Joshua or Ezra.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Deuteronomy 4:44-46
These verses are a heading marking where the historical prologue ends and the stipulations begin. The threefold "testimonies, statutes, and ordinances" is the book's name for its contents, and 6:20 puts the list into a child's question. The place is "the valley across the Jordan facing Beth-peor," the ground of the plague at verse 3, so the law is given on the site of the last apostasy.
Deuteronomy 4:44
“And this is the law which Moses set before the children of Israel. Not the law concerning the cities of refuge, but the law of the ten commands repeated in the following chapter; so Jarchi remarks,"this which he should set in order after this section;''as he does in the next chapter, where he repeats in order the ten precepts, and makes observations on the manner of the delivery of them, and urges obedience to them.”
The heading dates the law by the exodus, since these words were proclaimed after Israel came out of Egypt. John Gill reads the testimonies, statutes and ordinances as the moral, ceremonial and judicial laws, first delivered at Sinai in the third month after the departure and now repeated almost forty years later on the plains of Moab.
Deuteronomy 4:45
“These are the testimonies, and the statutes, and the judgments,.... The laws, moral, ceremonial, and judicial, delivered in the following chapters; which are renewed, repeated, and explained: which Moses spake unto the children of Israel, after they came forth out of Egypt; in the third month after they came from thence these laws were delivered to him at Mount Sinai, and he declared them to them; and now afresh, near forty years after, repeated them to them in the plains of Moab.”
The place is the conquered land of Sihon, so the law was delivered on ground Israel already held. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown think a temple of Peor probably stood in view of the camp while Moses pressed the LORD's sole claim to Israel's worship. John Gill notes that the defeat of Sihon had come only months before, near the end of forty years since Egypt.
Deuteronomy 4:46
“Beth-peor--that is, "house" or "temple of Peor." It is probable that a temple of this Moabite idol stood in full view of the Hebrew camp, while Moses was urging the exclusive claims of God to their worship, and this allusion would be very significant if it were the temple where so many of the Israelites had grievously offended.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Deuteronomy 4:47-49
These verses record the first land Israel actually holds, the kingdoms of Sihon and Og taken in chapters 2 and 3. At 3:11 Og alone "had remained of the remnant of the Rephaim," and his "bed of iron" was nine cubits long. Verse 48 calls Hermon "Mount Siyon," a name distinct from the Zion of Jerusalem, and 3:9 gives the Sidonian and Amorite names for it.
The verse gives the conquered territory its two ends, Aroer on the rim of the Arnon in the south and Hermon in the north. John Gill places Aroer on the border of Moab, as 2:36 does, and reads the two names as the southern and northern limits of the kingdoms of Sihon and Og.
Deuteronomy 4:48
“From Aroer, which is by the bank of the river Arnon,.... A city of Moab, which was situated on the bank of the river Arnon, that was on the border of Moab, Deu 2:36, even unto Mount Sion, which is Hermon; the meaning is, that the lands of these two kings conquered by Israel reached from the city Aroer on the river Arnon to Mount Hermon, the one being the southern, the other the northern boundary of them.”
The survey closes with the Jordan valley on the east side and the Sea of the Arabah, and it ends at Pisgah, the height from which Moses would see the land he was barred from entering. John Gill identifies the Sea of the Arabah as the Salt Sea and ties the slopes of Pisgah to 3:17.
Deuteronomy 4:49
“And all the plain on this side Jordan eastward,.... The plains of Moab, on that side of Jordan to the east: even unto the sea of the plain; the sea of Sodom, the salt sea: under the springs of Pisgah; that rose from Mount Pisgah, the same with Ashdothpisgah, Deu 3:17.”
How this psalm is built
The form: The closing argument of the first address, exhortation built on evidence, with a narrative heading after it, as Deuteronomy classes it.
The patterns in this chapter
| Device | What it does | Where to see it |
|---|---|---|
| The address opens and closes on the statutes | Verse 1 calls Israel to hear the statutes and ordinances so that they may live and take the land, and verse 40 calls them to keep the statutes and commandments so that they and their children may prosper and live long in it. Everything between the two verses stands inside that frame.This site's published exposition of Deuteronomy 4:39 to 40, The exposition_notes row on Deuteronomy 4:39 to 40, which records that the verse ends the address where verse 1 began it. | Deuteronomy 4:1, Deuteronomy 4:40 |
| The forms listed downward | Verses 16 to 18 run from male and female through beast, bird, creeping thing and fish, back along the order Genesis 1 built up, and verse 19 adds the sun, moon and stars. Paul works the same descent at Romans 1:23, where the glory of the immortal God is exchanged for images of mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.This site's published exposition of Deuteronomy 4:15 to 18, The exposition_notes row on Deuteronomy 4:15 to 18, citing Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch, 1866, and John Calvin, Commentary on the Four Last Books of Moses Arranged in the Form of a Harmony, 1563. | Deuteronomy 4:16, Deuteronomy 4:17, Deuteronomy 4:18, Deuteronomy 4:19 |
| Take heed to yourself | The warning stands three times, at verse 9 over the things their eyes had seen, at verse 15 over the absence of a form, and at verse 23 over the covenant itself. The site's published exposition records that verse 9 is the first of the nine places Deuteronomy says forget.This site's published exposition of Deuteronomy 4:9 to 10 and 4:23 to 24, The exposition_notes rows on Deuteronomy 4:9 to 10 and 4:23 to 24, citing Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch, 1866, and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710. | Deuteronomy 4:9, Deuteronomy 4:15, Deuteronomy 4:23 |
| What nation is there so great | Verses 7 and 8 ask the same question twice and answer it twice, first with nearness and then with the law itself, so access and content are offered as two pieces of one argument. Verses 32 to 34 run the pair again on a wider scale, a people who heard God speak out of fire and lived, and a god who took a nation out of the middle of another nation.This site's published exposition of Deuteronomy 4:7 to 8, The exposition_notes row on Deuteronomy 4:7 to 8, citing Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710. | Deuteronomy 4:7, Deuteronomy 4:8, Deuteronomy 4:33, Deuteronomy 4:34 |
| The sun whose name is servant | Matthew Henry records that the Hebrew word for the sun, shemesh, carries the sense of a servant, and reads the worship of it as absurd on the chapter's own ground, since the lights were ordained to give light on earth. Albert Barnes reads the dividing of verse 19 the same way, that God distributed their light to the nations for use, so they minister to man and are never man's lords.Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on Deuteronomy 4:19. | Deuteronomy 4:19 |
The argument from what was not seen
19 more paragraphs on the patterns
Verse 12 states the fact and verse 15 turns it into a rule. Adam Clarke reads the whole of it as deliberate, that however God chose to appear He took care never to assume any describable form, because He is a Spirit and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and in truth.
The list of forbidden forms is a list of the gods the hearers knew. Adam Clarke names Baal-peor and Priapus, Ashtaroth or Astarte and Venus for the likeness of male or female, and for the beasts and birds he names the Egyptian Apis worshipped as a white bull, the ibis and the hawk, serpents and the crocodile. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown read the caution as aimed chiefly at the Canaanites and the Egyptians, Baal and Astarte on one side, Osiris and Isis on the other. John Gill adds Dagon and Derceto among the Phoenicians for the likeness of a fish.
The debated readings in this chapter
What verse 19 means by apportioned. Albert Barnes and Matthew Henry read it as God distributing the light of the sun, moon and stars to all nations for their use, so that creatures which serve man must never be worshipped as his lords. The site's published exposition records a second reading that takes the verse beside 32:8 as an allotment of the nations themselves to other powers, and names Michael Heiser as the best known recent advocate of it. The dossier carries the manuscript variant at 32:8 on which that reading turns. This page states no verdict.
Who wrote the closing verses. Adam Clarke supposes the last nine verses of the chapter were added by Joshua or by Ezra. Albert Barnes reads verses 41 to 43 as a historical notice standing between two discourses and set there because the act happened between them. The dossier carries the same question at book scale for chapter 34.
Why Moses was refused. This is the third time in four chapters that the reason is given as the LORD's anger on the people's account, after 1:37 and 3:26. Numbers 20:12 gives it as unbelief at the waters of Meribah. John Gill notes one thing verse 21 adds that stands nowhere else, that the exclusion was sworn.
The historical value
The iron furnace of verse 20 is a working thing. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown record that it means a furnace for smelting iron, round, sometimes thirty feet deep, and needing the highest intensity of heat. That is the picture Egypt is given, and the phrase returns at 1 Kings 8:51 and Jeremiah 11:4.
The clause against adding and subtracting at verse 2 has a documentary history. The site's published exposition records that a prohibition on altering the document is a standing feature of second millennium treaty texts, which is part of what Meredith Kline and Kenneth Kitchen build on. Matthew Henry records the Jewish reading of the same verse as forbidding the alteration of the text or letter of the law, and credits the care that followed it with the integrity of the Hebrew text. Proverbs 30:6 sets the same guard over the words of God, and Revelation 22:18 sets it over a book of prophecy.
The cities of refuge are named and placed. Moses acts on Numbers 35:9 to 15 by setting apart the three that lie east of the Jordan, Bezer to Reuben, Ramoth in Gilead to Gad and Golan in Bashan to Manasseh, and Joshua 20:8 names the same three when the western three are added. The right protected is stated narrowly, a man who killed his neighbour unintentionally and without prior malice.
The evidential challenge, stated at its own tier
Verses 32 to 34 put the case as a question and set no limit on the search, from the day God created man on earth and from one end of the heavens to the other. The claim being tested is narrow: a whole people heard the voice of God out of the fire and lived, and a nation was taken out of the middle of another nation.
What the text says has an internal witness. Exodus 20:19 records what the people said while it was happening, and 5:24 to 26 repeats their words back to them, so the claim has an internal witness and the book knows it. Adam Clarke sets the scale of the second question, a people of upwards of six hundred thousand men besides women and children brought out of a powerful nation whose economy depended on their labour.
The chapter offers nothing outside the text as proof of either event, and rests the argument on the hearers' own memory. Verse 35 states what the whole demonstration was for, that they would know the LORD is God and there is no other.
The New Testament's use
Hebrews 12:29 carries the clause of verse 24 over as it stands, that our God is a consuming fire, and places it at the end of an argument about a kingdom that cannot be shaken.
Romans 1:23 runs the descent of verses 16 to 18 in Paul's own order, from mortal man to birds, animals and reptiles.
Mark 12:32 has a scribe answer Jesus in the words of verses 35 and 39, that God is One and there is no other but Him, which puts the conclusion of this chapter in the mouth of a man in the temple courts.
The promise of verses 29 and 30 is repeated to actual exiles at Jeremiah 29:13 in almost the same words, that they will seek and find when they search with all their heart.
Keep studying
People1
Words12
Subjects1
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The form and classifications
Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on Deuteronomy 4:41; Meredith G. Kline, with Kenneth A. Kitchen, Treaty of the Great King: The Covenant Structure of Deuteronomy, 1963, and On the Reliability of the Old Testament, 2003; Moshe Weinfeld, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School, 1972 and This site's published guide to Deuteronomy, src/components/book/guides/deuteronomy/DeuteronomyGuide.tsx, which ends the section Title, Setting and the Historical Recital at 4:43 and opens The Second Address at 4:44.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes on the Old Testament; Alfred Edersheim, The Temple: Its Ministry and Services; Basil of Caesarea, On the Spirit; Chuck Missler, Learn the Bible in 24 Hours; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Calvin, Commentary on the Four Last Books of Moses Arranged in the Form of a Harmony; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Origen of Alexandria, Homilies on Leviticus and Sir Robert Anderson, Types in Hebrews.
