Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.

2 Samuelchapter 3

39 verses · BSB2 Samuel book hub →

Key verse

Meanwhile, Saul had a concubine named Rizpah, the daughter of Aiah. So Ish-bosheth questioned Abner, “Why did you sleep with my father’s concubine?”

It stands in scene B of the chapter, verses 6 to 11.

The chapter

Chapter summary

'David waxed stronger and stronger, but the house of Saul waxed weaker and weaker' (3:1), the chapter is that sentence worked out. Sons are born in Hebron, Amnon and Absalom and Adonijah among them, all of whom will trouble him. Abner, accused over Saul's concubine, turns kingmaker for the other side; David's price is the return of Michal, and Paltiel follows her weeping to Bahurim. The deal is made and the feast eaten. Then Joab, who was not consulted and has a brother to avenge, calls Abner back to the gate of Hebron and stabs him. David curses Joab's house, walks behind the bier, and fasts: 'Know ye not that there is a prince and a great man fallen this day in Israel?'

Context

History · Nathan, Gad · 2 Samuel overview

Where the chapter sits

2 Samuel 3 falls in Rise: David over all Israel (chapters 1–10). Lament for Saul; anointing at Hebron; capture of Jerusalem; ark brought up; the Davidic covenant (ch. 7); Nathan's oracle; the Ammonite wars.

After it: The Fall: Bathsheba and Uriah, chapters 11–12.

The whole shape of 2 Samuel

The world behind this chapter

2 Samuel 3
When
The collapse of Saul's house · c. 1005 BC
Where
Mahanaim east of the Jordan, then the gate of Hebron
Who first heard it
Israelites weighing whether David was behind the killings that cleared his path

The history

A dead king's harem was political property. Taking a woman who had belonged to the king was a public claim on the throne itself, which is why the accusation about Rizpah enrages Abner and frightens Saul's son, it was not a private matter but a coup announced in the bedroom.

The rest of the history, and what it meant to them

Abner's price for switching sides is Michal's return. She had been David's wife by a bride-price paid in Philistine trophies, then handed to another man. Getting her back gave David a legal tie to the old royal house, which is exactly why he wanted her and why her second husband's weeping down the road changed nothing.

Israelite law put the duty of avenging a killing on the nearest male relative, called the redeemer of blood. Joab was Asahel's brother. But the law also drew a line between manslaughter in the heat of battle and murder, and set aside cities where an accused man could stand trial instead of being run down, and Hebron was one of them.

Joab kills Abner just inside the gate, in the one place a man was supposed to be safe, after calling him aside as if for a private word. David's response is a state funeral: he walks behind the bier, weeps at the grave, and swears off food until sundown. In that culture the chief mourner's public conduct was the evidence of where he stood.

What it meant to them

Everyone in Israel would have asked the obvious question, who benefits? The chapter answers it in the most public way available: the king fasts, mourns, and says out loud that he is weak while these sons of Zeruiah are too hard for him.

For the first hearers this was the difference between a kingdom built on murder and a kingdom that inherited murderers it had not yet dealt with.

Sources cited

  • Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Its Life and Institutions
  • Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel

Every work MannaFest builds on →

A. The long war, and sons born at Hebron

1. (v. 1)

a.The chapter opens with the shape of the whole civil war stated as a single trend line rather than a battle count: David rising, the house of Saul falling, across what Clarke reckons as the two years after Ish-bosheth's crowning to his fifth year. Henry reads the verse a second way, as a picture of sanctification, grace waxing stronger against a weakening corruption, and gives it beside the plain history rather than instead of it.

2 Samuel 3:1, 1 voiceWhat preachers and commentators have said about these verses, in their own words.

2 Samuel 3:1

There was long war - Frequent battles and skirmishes took place between the followers of David and the followers of Ish-bosheth, after the two years mentioned above, to the end of the fifth year, in which Ish-bosheth was slain by Rechab and Baanah.

2. (vv. 2-5)

a.Six sons by six wives in the seven and a half years at Hebron: Amnon, Chileab, Absalom, Adonijah, Shephatiah and Ithream, and three of the six names will carry the book's later grief. JFB reads the Geshur marriage that gives Absalom his mother as a political match, an alliance against Ish-bosheth's party in the north bought at the price Henry calls David's grief and shame. Adonijah, the fourth son, will claim the throne on David's deathbed and die by Solomon's order at 1 Kings 2:24-25, so the list already holds the seed of the chapters still to come.

2 Samuel 3:2, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:2

And unto David were sons born in Hebron,.... He was married before he came there, had wives in his state of exile, but had no children by them there, at least no sons; if any, only daughters: and his firstborn was Amnon, of Ahinoam the Jezreelitess; who being mentioned first, and her son his firstborn, seems to have been his wife before be took Abigail; he had not much comfort of this firstborn son of his; see 2Sa 13:1.

2 Samuel 3:3, 2 voices

2 Samuel 3:3

Chileab - In the duplicate passage (see the margin.) David’s second son is called Daniel (God is my judge), a name given to him in commemoration of the death of Nabal 1Sa 25:39. Chileab seems to be made up of the three first letters of the following Hebrew word, through an error of the transcriber, and intended to be erased. Talmai king of Geshur - Talmai was the name of one of the sons of Anak at Hebron Num 13:22; this Talmai was perhaps of the same race.

2 Samuel 3:3

This marriage seems to have been a political match, made by David, with a view to strengthen himself against Ish-bosheth's party, by the aid of a powerful friend and ally in the north. Piety was made to yield to policy, and the bitter fruits of this alliance with a heathen prince he reaped in the life of the turbulent Absalom.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 Samuel 3:4, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:4

Adonijah - The same who, when David was dying, aspired to the crown, and was put to death by Solomon. Shephatiah - “God is judge.” This is the same name as Jehoshaphat, only with the two elements composing it placed in inverted order. Nothing more is known of him or of his brother Ithream.

2 Samuel 3:5, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:5

Eglah David's wife--This addition has led many to think that Eglah was another name for Michal, the first and proper wife, who, though she had no family after her insolent ridicule of David (2Sa 6:23), might have had a child before.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

B. Abner breaks with Ish-bosheth over a concubine

1. (vv. 6-8)

a.Abner is the power behind Ish-bosheth's throne, and Clarke reads his taking of Saul's concubine Rizpah as a claim on the kingdom itself, the same reading the narrator later gives Absalom's act at 16:22 and Adonijah's request for Abishag at 1 Kings 2:21-22. Ish-bosheth's question is timid rather than accusing, and Gill notes he had been the one strongly supported by Abner throughout the war just named in verse 6. Abner's answer, a dog's head, weighs every service he has done the house of Saul against one suspicion voiced by a king he privately despises.

2 Samuel 3:6, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:6

Abner made himself strong - This strengthening of himself, and going in to the late king’s concubine, were most evident proofs that he wished to seize upon the government. See 1Ki 2:21, 1Ki 2:22; 1Ki 12:8; 1Ki 16:21.

2 Samuel 3:7, 2 voices

2 Samuel 3:7

And Saul had a concubine, whose name was Rizpah, the daughter of Aiah,.... By whom he had two sons, 2Sa 21:

2 Samuel 3:7

Rizpah, the daughter of Aiah - For the sequel of her history, see the marginal reference. Aiah, was an Edomite, or rather Horite name Gen 36:24.

2 Samuel 3:8, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:8

Am I a dog’s head - Dost thou treat a man with indignity who has been the only prop of thy tottering kingdom, and the only person who could make head against the house of David?

2. (vv. 9-11)

a.Abner's oath, so do God to Abner and more also, is the same self-cursing form David himself will use at verse 35, and here it turns his whole army over to the man he has spent the chapter's opening fighting. He states the transfer as a thing already sworn, to set up the throne of David over Israel and over Judah from Dan even to Beer-sheba, language the book has not put in his mouth before this quarrel. Gill notes he speaks of the Lord's own oath as though his defection accomplishes it, and Ish-bosheth, who cannot answer him a word, is left holding a crown Abner has just declared forfeit.

2 Samuel 3:9, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:9

Except, as the Lord hath sworn to David - And why did he not do this before, when he knew that God had given the kingdom to David? Was he not now, according to his own concession, fighting against God?

2 Samuel 3:10, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:10

To translate the kingdom from the house of Saul,.... Which was what the Lord had sworn to do, 1Sa 15:28; and which Abner now threatens to do, insolently taking that to himself which belonged to the Lord, and as if he could not do it without him: and to set up the throne of David over Israel and over Judah; over the one as well as over the other; for it was set over Judah already: from Dan even unto Beersheba; which were the utmost borders of the land of Israel, from north to south, and so includes the whole.

2 Samuel 3:11, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:11

If Ish-bosheth had had the spirit of a man, especially of a prince, he might have answered him that his merits were the aggravation of his crimes, that he would not be served by so base a man, and doubted not but to do well enough without him. But he was conscious to himself of his own weakness, and therefore said not a word, lest he should make bad worse.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

C. Abner's deal, and Michal brought home weeping

1. (vv. 12-14)

a.Abner opens the negotiation with whose is the land, offering David the whole kingdom's allegiance, and Henry reads the providence of it without excusing the man: God can make those serviceable to his purpose who have no sincere love for it. David's one condition answers with a demand of his own, the return of Michal, and he prices her by the very sum he once paid Saul for her, an hundred foreskins of the Philistines, the bride price of 1 Samuel 18:25-27 named again as a legal claim rather than a memory.

2 Samuel 3:12, 3 voices

2 Samuel 3:12

And Abner sent messengers to David on his behalf,.... On his own account, and not on the account of Ishbosheth, or the people of Israel; but to obtain terms for himself, or in his own name, as representing him and standing in his stead; or secretly, as Kimchi explains it, unknown to Ishbosheth, or the people of Israel.

2 Samuel 3:12

Abner sent messengers to David--Though his language implied a secret conviction, that in supporting Ish-bosheth he had been laboring to frustrate the divine purpose of conferring the sovereignty of the kingdom on David, this acknowledgment was no justification either of the measure he was now adopting, or of the motives that prompted it.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 Samuel 3:12

He sent messengers to David, to tell him that he was at his service. " Whose is the land? For thou hast the best title to the government and the best interest in the people's affections." Note, God can find out ways to make those serviceable to the kingdom of Christ who yet have no sincere affection for it and who have vigorously set themselves against it.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Samuel 3:13, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:13

David’s motive in requiring the restitution of Michal was partly his affection for her, and his memory of her love for him; partly the wish to wipe out the affront put upon him in taking away his wife, by obtaining her return; and partly, also, a politic consideration of the effect on Saul’s partisans of a daughter of Saul being David’s queen.

2 Samuel 3:14, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:14

Deliver me my wife - It is supposed that he meant to screen Abner; and to prevent that violence which he might have used in carrying off Michal.

2. (vv. 15-16)

a.Ish-bosheth strips Michal from Phaltiel, the man Saul gave her to at 1 Samuel 25:44 while David was still in exile, and the narrator lets Phaltiel's grief stand without comment, following her weeping to Bahurim until Abner's one word ends it. Barnes reads David's legal right as intact since no divorce had passed between them, but the verse itself withholds any word from David or Michal about the reunion, an ordinary man's sorrow given more space in the text than the king's.

2 Samuel 3:15, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:15

And Ishbosheth sent and took her from her husband,.... Her second husband, to whom Saul had given her, 1Sa 25:44, even from Phaltiel the son of Laish; he is called Phalti in 1Sa 25:44.

2 Samuel 3:16, 2 voices

2 Samuel 3:16

And her husband went with her along weeping behind her,.... Because of his great affection to her, unwilling to part with her, but forced to it at the command of the king her brother: to Bahurim; a city in the tribe of Benjamin, 2Sa 19:16; perhaps the same with Almon, Jos 21:18; these two words being of the same signification; and the Targum has it hero Almuth; so Alemeth in 1Ch 6:60. It seems to be the same Josephus (c) calls Bachures, and says it was not far from Jerusalem.

2 Samuel 3:16

Weeping behind her - If genuine affection did not still subsist between David and Michal, it was a pity to have taken her from Phaltiel, who had her to wife from the conjoint authority of her father and her king. Nevertheless David had a legal right to her, as she had never been divorced, for she was taken from him by the hand of violence.

3. (vv. 17-19)

a.Abner works two audiences before he ever reaches Hebron, the elders of Israel and the house of Benjamin, Saul's own tribe, and his argument to both is the word already spoken of David, by the hand of my servant David I will save my people Israel. Barnes reads Abner's influence as the very thing that had kept the elders from declaring for David until now, so his defection removes the last obstacle at a stroke. Spurgeon preached the phrase now then do it as a call to present obedience: light once given leaves no room for delay.

2 Samuel 3:17, 2 voices

2 Samuel 3:17

Ye sought for David ... - Compare 1Sa 18:5. It was only by Abner’s great influence that the elders of Israel had been restrained hitherto from declaring for David, and this accounts for Ish-bosheth’s helpless submission to his uncle’s dictation.

2 Samuel 3:17-21

Abner had communication with the elders of Israel--He spoke the truth in impressing their minds with the well-known fact of David's divine designation to the kingdom. But he acted a base and hypocritical part in pretending that his present movement was prompted by religious motives, when it sprang entirely from malice and revenge against Ish-bosheth.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 Samuel 3:18, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:18

The Lord hath spoken of David - Where is this spoken? Such a promise is not extant. Perhaps it means no more than, “Thus, it may be presumed, God hath determined.”

4. (vv. 20-21)

a.Abner comes to Hebron with twenty men and is received at David's table, the feast marking a peace already struck rather than one still being negotiated. Ambrose reads David's whole conduct toward a former enemy as the mark of the man, admiring valor even in one who had led the opposing army. Abner leaves in peace with a promise to gather all Israel, and the phrase he went in peace closes the scene twice, here and again at verse 22, before Joab reopens it.

2 Samuel 3:20, 2 voices

2 Samuel 3:20

He had bound the people to himself freely in doing his duty; first, when during the division among the people he preferred to live like an exile at Hebron rather than to reign at Jerusalem; next, when he showed that he loved valor even in an enemy. He had also thought that justice should be shown to those who had borne arms against himself the same as to his own men. Again, he admired Abner, the bravest champion of the opposing side, while he was their leader and was yet waging war.

Ambrose of Milan· written before 397· On the Duties of the Clergy 2.7.33patristic

2 Samuel 3:20

Twenty men - These were doubtless his official suite as Ish-bosheth’s envoy to conduct Michal to David, but privy and consenting to his intrigue with David. It is remarkable that not a word should be said about the meeting of David and Michal.

D. Joab's knife in the gate of Hebron

1. (vv. 22-25)

a.Joab returns from a raid to find the man who killed his brother Asahel already fed and dismissed under David's own safe conduct, and his question to the king, what hast thou done, is an accusation dressed as concern. JFB reads Joab's stated fear, that Abner came to deceive thee, as cover for two motives the narrator names plainly enough elsewhere: the blood feud from 2:23 and a general's fear of losing his place to a rival commander. Nothing in Joab's speech to David answers David's welcome of Abner; it only reinterprets it.

2 Samuel 3:24, 2 voices

2 Samuel 3:24

Joab saw that if Abner was reconciled to David, his own post as second in the state would be forfeited; and then with characteristic unscrupulosity he proceeded to take Abner’s life.

2 Samuel 3:24-27

To these considerations was added the remembrance of the blood feud that existed between them since the death of his brother Asahel (2Sa 2:23).

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2. (vv. 26-27)

a.sent messengers after Abner: Joab acts without David's knowledge, sending word to recall Abner from the well of Sirah and killing him quietly in the gate, the place of judgment and business turned into an ambush. The text names the motive Joab claims, for the blood of Asahel his brother, and Clarke reads underneath it the motive Joab does not claim, that Abner alive and reconciled to David would likely have taken the command Joab held. Blood avenging had a place under the law at a city of refuge; a private killing by deceit in an open gate answers to no such provision.

2 Samuel 3:26, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:26

The well Sirah - Nowhere else mentioned; according to Josephus, about two and a half miles from Hebron.

2 Samuel 3:27, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:27

And smote him there - Joab feared that, after having rendered such essential services to David, Abner would be made captain of the host: he therefore determined to prevent it by murdering the man, under pretense of avenging the death of his brother Asahel. The murder, however, was one of the most unprovoked and wicked: and such was the power and influence of this nefarious general, that the king dared not to bring him to justice for his crime. In the same way he murdered Amasa, a little time afterwards. See 2Sa 20:

3. (vv. 28-30)

a.David's declaration puts the whole crime on Joab's house by name, a curse naming issue, leprosy, the crutch of the lame, death by the sword and want of bread across generations, and Barnes reads the curse itself as proof David did not accept Joab's claim to have acted as an avenger of blood under the law. The narrator names Abishai beside Joab as guilty of the same killing, though Joab alone struck the blow, because he had slain their brother Asahel at Gibeon in the battle answers the crime to Asahel's death and to nothing else Abner had done.

2 Samuel 3:28, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:28

It is a comfort to be able to say, when any bad thing is done, that we had no hand in it. We have not shed this blood, Deut. xxi. However we may be censured or suspected, our hearts shall not reproach us.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Samuel 3:29, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:29

The curse of David proves that Joab was not justified as blood-revenger or Goel 2Sa 3:27 in taking away Abner’s life. That leaneth on a staff - Rather, a crutch. The phrase denotes one lame or infirm. For similar instances of hereditary disease and poverty as a punishment of great sin, see 1Sa 2:31-33, 1Sa 2:36; 2Ki 5:27; Joh 9:2.

2 Samuel 3:30, 2 voices

2 Samuel 3:30

Abishai - For though Joab only committed the murder, yet Abishai was guilty of it, because it was done with his consent, and counsel, and approbation. In battle - Which he did for his own necessary defense; and therefore it was no justification of this treacherous murder.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Samuel 3:30

Righteousness supports the throne and will never shake it. Yet it was only a reprieve that David gave to Joab; on his death-bed he left it to Solomon (who could the better wield the sword of justice because he had no occasion to draw the sword of war) to avenge the blood of Abner. Evil pursues sinners, and will overtake them at last.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

E. The king walks behind the bier

1. (vv. 31-32)

a.David orders the whole camp into mourning, Joab included, and then walks behind Abner's own bier himself, a public act JFB reads as sincere grief given a public form rather than grief alone. He weeps again at the grave with all the people, and Henry reads the honor paid to a man who had been David's enemy through most of the chapter as proof that David bore Abner no private malice even while he could not yet bring Joab to account for killing him.

2 Samuel 3:31, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:31

Joab - Him he especially obliged to it, to bring him to repentance for his sin, and to expose him to public shame. Followed - That is, attending upon his corps, and paying him that respect which was due to his quality.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Samuel 3:32, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:32

Though Abner had been his enemy, and might possibly have proved no very firm friend, yet because he had been a man of bravery in the field, and might have done great service in the public counsels at this critical juncture, all former quarrels are forgotten and David is a true mourner for his fall.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2. (vv. 33-34)

a.David composes a dirge over Abner, the second such lament the book records after the one over Saul and Jonathan at 1:19-27, and its question answers itself in the next line: thy hands were not bound, nor thy feet put into fetters, a man cut down by treachery rather than by any justice he had earned. Barnes reads the whole lament as the deliberate opposite of a fool's death, since Abner was neither guilty nor helpless but simply unwarned, and Wesley reads the line as a general warning against any death a man brings nearer by his own folly, applied here to the man who struck rather than the man who fell.

2 Samuel 3:33, 2 voices

2 Samuel 3:33

Lamented - i. e. composed and sang the funeral dirge which follows (compare 2Sa 1:17). Died Abner ... - i. e. The great and noble and valiant Abner had died as ignobly and as helplessly as the meanest churl!

2 Samuel 3:33

Was he cut off by the hand of justice for his crimes? Nothing less; but by Joab's malice and treachery. It is a sad thing to die as a fool dieth, as they do that any way shorten their own days: and indeed all they that make no provision for another world.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 Samuel 3:34, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:34

Thy hands were not bound ... - This thought prepares the way for the solution; Abner had been treacherously murdered by wicked men.

3. (vv. 35-37)

a.David fasts publicly until sundown and swears the same self-cursing oath Abner used at verse 9, so do God to me and more also, and the people read his refusal to eat as proof of a grief they could not have staged for him. Spurgeon preached the episode as the moment Joab's treachery first compromised a reign otherwise marked by justice, and the chapter records the verdict the fast was meant to earn: all Israel understood that day that it was not of the king to slay Abner.

2 Samuel 3:36, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:36

The people took notice - They saw that the king’s grief was sincere, and that he had no part nor device in the murder of Abner: see 2Sa 3:37.

4. (v. 38)

a.David's word to his own servants names what the murder cost Israel rather than only what it cost him: a prince and a great man, the very general whose defection had been about to hand him every remaining tribe without a further battle. Henry reads the line as David's own grief speaking honestly, weighing what Abner's life was worth to the kingdom now that it is gone.

2 Samuel 3:38, 1 voice

2 Samuel 3:38

If he could be brought to do it sincerely, it would be an expression of repentance for his sin in slaying him. If he did it in show only, as it is likely he did, yet it was a sort of penance imposed upon him, and a present commutation of the punishment. If he do not as yet expiate the murder with his blood, let him do something towards it with tears.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

5. (v. 39)

a.David calls himself weak in the very sentence that names him anointed, one clause holding the title and the confession together: this day weak, though anointed king. Clarke reads the sons of Zeruiah, Joab and his brothers, as the true holders of power in Hebron at this point, David reduced to a shadow of the office God had already given him, and the king leaves the doer of evil unnamed and the sentence unenforced, a debt the book carries until David charges Solomon with it on his own deathbed at 1 Kings 2:5-6.

2 Samuel 3:39, 2 voices

2 Samuel 3:39

I am this day weak - Had Abner lived, all the tribes of Israel would have been brought under my government. Though anointed king - I have little else than the title: first, having only one tribe under my government; and secondly, the sons of Zeruiah, Joab and his brethren, having usurped all the power, and reduced me to the shadow of royalty. The Lord shall reward the doer of evil - That is, Joab, whom he appears afraid to name.

2 Samuel 3:39

It was therefore carnal wicked policy, yea cruel pity that spared him. If the law had had its course against Joab, it is probable the murder of Ishbosheth, Ammon, and others, had been prevented. So truly was he in these, and some other respects, a bloody man, which may be observed to the glory of the Divine grace, in his forgiveness and conversion.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The text of this chapter

This page carries no textual note on 2 Samuel 3. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →

This page draws on 10 works. Open for the list.

This page draws on Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes; Ambrose of Milan; Charles Spurgeon; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871); Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill; John Wesley; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel and Matthew Henry.

Keep studying

On this page

Studies2

On this book