Luke 24:12
in Luke 24Peter, however, got up and ran to the tomb. And after bending down and seeing only the linen cloths, he went away, wondering to himself what had happened.
BSB
The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾
ASV
But Peter arose, and ran unto the tomb; and stooping and looking in, he seeth the linen cloths by themselves; and he departed to his home, wondering at that which was come to pass.
KJV
Then arose Peter, and ran unto the sepulchre; and stooping down, he beheld the linen clothes laid by themselves, and departed, wondering in himself at that which was come to pass.
⋯
This verse in Luke 24
Commentary
14 notes on this verseFor he alone believed the women saying that they had seen Angels; and as he was of more ardent feelings than the rest, he anxiously put himself foremost, looking every where for the Lord; as it follows, And stooping down, he beheld the linen clothes laid by themselves.
This site's exposition
seemed like nonsense to them
on Luke 24:11-12
The women's report meets disbelief, for their words seemed like nonsense. Peter ran to the tomb and went away wondering, still short of faith, which prepares for the appearance to him that verse 34 reports.
This site's exposition
seeing only the linen cloths
Peter runs though the others dismissed the report as nonsense in verse 11. Adam Clarke counts the linen cloths lying by themselves as no mean proof of the resurrection.
The record, by era
The Church Fathers2 voices
Luke is supposed to have mentioned this concerning Peter, recapitulating. For Peter ran to the sepulchre at the same time that John also went, as soon as it had been told to them alone by the women, (especially Mary Magdalene,) that the body was taken away. But the vision of Angels took place afterwards. Luke therefore mentioned Peter only, because to him Mary first told it. It may also strike one, that Luke says that Peter, not entering but stooping down, saw the linen clothes by themselves, and departed wondering, whereas John says, that he himself saw the linen clothes in the same position, and that he entered after Peter. We must understand then that Peter first saw them stooping down, which Luke mentions, John omits, but that he afterwards entered before John came in.
A commentator
Ephrem the SyrianCOMMENTARY ON TATIAN'S DIATESSARON 21.23 · Written before 373.
proposed
If he left his clothes behind in the tomb, it was so that Adam could enter into paradise without clothing, just as he had been before he had sinned. In place of having to leave paradise clothed, he now had to strip himself before entering …
The Medieval Church3 voices
Therefore the doubt arising from hearing incited them to seek certainty through sight; on account of which he adds: But Peter rising up ran to the tomb, and stooping down he saw the linen cloths laid by themselves, and he went away, wondering within himself …
Peter, as soon as he heard this, delays not, but runs to the sepulchre; for fire when applied to matter knows no delay; as it follows, Then arose Peter, and ran to the sepulchre. But now when he was at the tomb, he first of all obtained that he should marvel at those things which had before been derided by himself or the others; as it is said, And departed, wondering in himself at that which was come to pass; that is, wondering in himself at the way in which it had happened, how the linen clothes had been left behind, since the body was anointed with myrrh; or what opportunity the thief had obtained, that putting away the clothes wrapped up by themselves, he should take away the body with the soldiers standing round.
But Peter arose and ran to the tomb, and stooping down, he saw the linen cloths alone, and he went away, wondering to himself what had happened. Luke briefly mentions Peter's run; but how this happened is more fully detailed by John, who also says …
6 more voices on this verse
The Medieval Church1 voice
However, Peter does not delay, like fire that has taken hold of material, but runs to the tomb and sees only the linen cloths lying there. And from the fact that he reached the tomb, the first benefit is that instead of mocking, he marvels: …
The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices
Then arose Peter,.... Who, though he did not believe the report made, yet listened to it, and was alarmed and aroused by it, and was willing to know the truth of it: and ran unto the sepulchre; not alone, but with John, being in haste to be satisfied, how things were: and stooping down; See Gill on Mar 16:
Had he remembered the words of Christ, even this was enough to satisfy him that he was risen from the dead; but, having forgotten them, he is only amazed with the thing, and knows not what to make of it. There is many a thing puzzling and perplexing to us which would be both plain and profitable if we did but rightly understand the words of Christ, and had them ready to us.
The Nineteenth Century3 voices
Then arose Peter - John went with him, and got to the tomb before him. See Joh 20:2, Joh 20:3. The linen clothes laid by themselves - Or, The linen clothes only. This was the fine linen which Joseph of Arimathea bought, and wrapped the body in: Mar 15:46. Small as this circumstance may at first view appear, it is, nevertheless, no mean proof of the resurrection of our Lord.
A commentator
J.C. Ryle1816–1900
Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Luke (lightly modernized text, Grace Gems edition) (1858)
proposed
The resurrection of Christ is one of the great foundation-stones of the Christian religion. In practical importance, it is second only to the crucifixion. The chapter we have now begun, directs our mind to the evidence of the resurrection. It contains unanswerable proof that Jesus not only died, but rose again. We see, in the verses before us — the reality of Christ's resurrection . We read, that upon "the first day of the week" certain women came to the tomb in which the body of Jesus had been laid, in order to anoint Him.
A commentator
J.C. Ryle1816–1900
Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Luke (lightly modernized text, Grace Gems edition) (1858)
proposed
The resurrection of Christ is one of the great foundation-stones of the Christian religion. In practical importance, it is second only to the crucifixion. The chapter we have now begun, directs our mind to the evidence of the resurrection. It contains unanswerable proof that Jesus not only died, but rose again. We see, in the verses before us — the reality of Christ's resurrection . We read, that upon "the first day of the week" certain women came to the tomb in which the body of Jesus had been laid, in order to anoint Him. But when they came to the place, "they found the stone rolled away. When they entered in, they did not find the body of the Lord Jesus." This simple fact is the starting-point in the history of the resurrection of Christ. On Friday morning His body was safe in the tomb. On Sunday morning His body was gone. By whose hands had it been taken away? Who had removed it? Not surely the priests and scribes and other enemies of Christ! If they had had Christ's body to show in disproof of His resurrection — then they would gladly have shown it. Not the apostles and other disciples of our Lord! They were far too much frightened and dispirited to attempt such an action, and the more so when they had nothing to gain by it. One explanation, and one only, can meet the circumstance of the case. That explanation is the one supplied by the angels in the verse before us. Christ "had risen" from the grave. To seek Him in the sepulcher was seeking "the living among the dead." He had arisen, and was soon seen alive and conversing, by many credible witnesses. The fact of our Lord's resurrection rests on evidence which no infidel can ever explain away. It is confirmed by testimony of every kind, sort, and description. The plain unvarnished story which the Gospel writers tell about it — is one which cannot be overthrown.
The words behind it
21 Greek wordsEvery Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.
| Greek | Sound | Meaning | Word study | In the Bible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ὁ | ho | <the> | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| δὲ | de | But | G1161 → | 2765 times |
| Πέτρος | petros | Peter | G4074 → | 155 times |
| ἀναστὰς | anastas | having risen up | G450 → | 107 times |
| ἔδραμεν | edramen | he ran | G5143 → | |
| ἐπὶ | epi | to | G1909 → | 883 times |
| τὸ | to | the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| μνημεῖον, | mnemeion | tomb, | G3419 → | 40 times |
| καὶ | kai | and | G2532 → | 9120 times |
| παρακύψας | parakupsas | having stooped down | G3879 → | |
| βλέπει | blepei | he sees | G991 → | 132 times |
| τὰ | ta | the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| ὀθόνια | othonia | linen strips | G3608 → | |
| μόνα | mona | alone | G3441 → | 110 times |
| καὶ | kai | and | G2532 → | 9120 times |
| ἀπῆλθεν | apelthen | he went away | G565 → | 115 times |
| πρὸς | pros | in | G4314 → | 700 times |
| ἑαυτὸν | he'auton | himself | G1438 → | 322 times |
| θαυμάζων | thaumazon | wondering at | G2296 → | 43 times |
| τὸ | to | that | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| γεγονός.¶ | gegonos | having come to pass. | G1096 → | 667 times |
Ὁ<the>
hoG3588 →19766 times
δὲBut
deG1161 →2765 times
ΠέτροςPeter
petrosG4074 →155 times
ἀναστὰςhaving risen up
anastasG450 →107 times
ἔδραμενhe ran
edramenG5143 →
ἐπὶto
epiG1909 →883 times
τὸthe
toG3588 →19766 times
μνημεῖον,tomb,
mnemeionG3419 →40 times
καὶand
kaiG2532 →9120 times
παρακύψαςhaving stooped down
parakupsasG3879 →
βλέπειhe sees
blepeiG991 →132 times
τὰthe
taG3588 →19766 times
ὀθόνιαlinen strips
othoniaG3608 →
μόναalone
monaG3441 →110 times
καὶand
kaiG2532 →9120 times
ἀπῆλθενhe went away
apelthenG565 →115 times
πρὸςin
prosG4314 →700 times
ἑαυτὸνhimself
he'autonG1438 →322 times
θαυμάζωνwondering at
thaumazonG2296 →43 times
τὸthat
toG3588 →19766 times
γεγονός.¶having come to pass.
gegonosG1096 →667 times
A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.
Where this verse is studied
On this page
Studies24
On this verse
On this chapter
About Luke

This page draws on 12 works. Open the list of works
This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Gospels; Augustine of Hippo, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Bede, On the Gospel of Luke; Bonaventure, Commentary on Luke, Chapter 24; Ephrem the Syrian, COMMENTARY ON TATIAN'S DIATESSARON 21.23; Eusebius of Caesarea, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Luke (lightly modernized text, Grace Gems edition); John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Theophylact of Ohrid, Catena Aurea by Aquinas and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Luke.
