Skip to content
mannafest.faith

A Reader's Map · The Jewish Writings

The Jewish Writings

This site cites Jewish tradition often: the Mishnah on a custom, the Talmud on a legal question, a midrash on a verse, a commentator’s name attached to a reading. This page is the map. Every name, date, and body of literature a reader meets in those citations is placed here, once, so it never has to be explained cold on a page built for something else. Nothing here is MannaFest’s confession. It is a description of what Israel’s own tradition wrote, and when, and by whom.

Summary

Jewish tradition carries its own library alongside the Hebrew Bible: the Mishnah, two Talmuds, Midrash, the Targums, and a line of great commentators. This page names each body of literature, says when it was written and by whom, and gives the one distinction, halakhah versus aggadah, that helps a reader most.

  • The Tanakh is the same books as the Protestant Old Testament, counted and arranged differently: Torah, Nevi'im, Ketuvim
  • The Mishnah (c. 200 AD) is the first written code of Jewish oral law, edited by Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi, in six orders
  • Two Talmuds exist, the Jerusalem Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud; this site's citations are almost always the Babylonian, the larger and more authoritative of the two
  • Halakhah is law, binding practice; aggadah is narrative and lore, illustrative rather than binding. Knowing which one a citation is changes how much weight it carries
  • Rashi, Ibn Ezra, Ramban, and Sforno are the medieval commentators a reader will meet most often on this site, each named, dated, and placed

The Tanakh

the same books as the Protestant Old Testament, in a different order

Tanakh is an acronym built from the Hebrew names of its three divisions: Torah (teaching, the five books of Moses), Nevi’im (Prophets), and Ketuvim (Writings). The Protestant Old Testament and the Jewish Tanakh contain the same books, counted and arranged differently. Where a Protestant Bible runs Genesis through Malachi and treats history, poetry, and prophecy as separate blocks, the Tanakh closes with Chronicles in the Writings, not with a prophet, and reads its own order as building toward the Writings rather than toward the prophets.

Torah is the five books of Moses. Nevi’im splits into the Former Prophets (Joshua through Kings, read as history written with a prophetic purpose) and the Latter Prophets (Isaiah through the twelve minor prophets). Ketuvim gathers everything else: Psalms, Proverbs, Job, the five scrolls (Song of Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther), Daniel, Ezra-Nehemiah, and Chronicles.

  • 24
    books in the Tanakh's own count
  • 3
    divisions: Torah, Nevi'im, Ketuvim
  • 39
    the same books, counted as in the Protestant Old Testament

The Mishnah

c. 200 AD, edited by Judah ha-Nasi, the first written code of Jewish oral law

For centuries, Jewish legal tradition held that alongside the written Torah, an oral tradition had been passed down explaining how to keep it. Around 200 AD, in the aftermath of the Bar Kokhba revolt and the crisis of transmitting that oral material safely, Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (Judah the Prince) edited it into a single written work: the Mishnah, from a Hebrew root meaning repetition or teaching by repetition.

The Mishnah organizes its material into six orders (sedarim), each covering a broad area of life: Zera’im (seeds, agricultural law and blessings), Mo’ed (festivals and the Sabbath), Nashim (women, marriage and divorce law), Nezikin (damages, civil and criminal law, including the tractate Sanhedrin on courts and capital cases), Kodashim (holy things, temple sacrifice and ritual), and Tohorot (purities, ritual cleanness).

Why the Mishnah is dated so preciselyc. 200 AD, under Roman rule in the land of Israel

The Mishnah’s own internal chain of named rabbis, and its silence about events after roughly 200 AD, allow scholars to date its final editing with unusual confidence. This matters for how this site uses it: any Mishnah citation describes practice and legal reasoning from around 200 AD, not automatically first-century practice, even when it discusses an institution (like the Sanhedrin) that existed two centuries earlier.

The Two Talmuds

Mishnah plus Gemara; Yerushalmi versus Bavli, and why this site cites Bavli

A Talmud is the Mishnah plus centuries of rabbinic discussion and argument about it, called the Gemara (Aramaic for completion). Two communities produced two separate Gemaras on the Mishnah, and so there are two Talmuds.

The Jerusalem Talmud (Talmud Yerushalmi) was compiled by rabbis in the land of Israel, finished around 400 AD, under increasing Roman and Byzantine pressure that cut the work short. The Babylonian Talmud (Talmud Bavli) was compiled by the larger, more stable rabbinic academies in Babylonia, finished around 500 to 600 AD. The Bavli is longer, more thoroughly edited, and became the authoritative Talmud for nearly all of later Jewish law and study. When this site cites “the Talmud” without further specification, it means the Bavli, matching standard practice, and any citation names the tractate and page (for example, Sanhedrin 98b).

  • c. 400
    Jerusalem Talmud finished (AD)
  • c. 500-600
    Babylonian Talmud finished (AD)
  • Bavli
    the Talmud this site cites by default

Halakhah and Aggadah

the single most useful distinction a reader can carry: law versus lore

Rabbinic literature carries two very different kinds of material side by side, often in the same page of Talmud, and knowing which one a citation is changes how it should be weighed.

Halakhah(from a root meaning “to walk,” the way one walks) is legal material: binding practice, the actual rulings that govern how a traditional Jew keeps the law. A halakhic ruling is meant to be followed.

Aggadahis everything else: narrative, homiletical expansion, parable, moral teaching, folklore, theological speculation. Aggadah is illustrative, not binding. A rabbi is free to disagree with another rabbi’s aggadah in a way he is not free to disagree with settled halakhah. When a rabbinic source on this site is described as a legend, a homily, or a moral illustration, it is aggadah; when it describes an actual legal ruling, it is halakhah, and the difference is named plainly wherever it matters.

Midrash

from a root meaning to seek out: interpretation that fills gaps and draws lessons

A midrash is a piece of rabbinic interpretation that goes beyond the plain sense of a biblical text: filling a narrative gap the text leaves open, drawing a moral or legal lesson from a word choice or an apparent redundancy, or connecting two passages that share a word or theme. Midrash exists both as a method (something a rabbi does to a verse) and as a body of literature (collections like Genesis Rabbah or Ruth Rabbah, gathered and edited across roughly the third to twelfth centuries AD, the range spanning early classical midrashim through later medieval collections).

Midrash can be halakhic (drawing legal rulings from the text) or aggadic (drawing narrative and moral material), and most of the midrash this site cites is aggadic: a reading that adds color, a plausible historical detail, or a theological observation, never presented as the plain sense of the verse itself.

The Targums

Aramaic translations that often paraphrase and interpret as they translate

Targum means translation or interpretation. By the last centuries BC, Aramaic had replaced Hebrew as the everyday spoken language of most Jews in the land of Israel, and the Targums are Aramaic translations of the Hebrew Bible, read alongside the Hebrew text in the synagogue. They are rarely word-for-word translations. A Targum regularly expands a difficult or theologically sensitive verse with an explanatory phrase, which means a Targum can preserve an ancient interpretive tradition even where it departs from a strict translation. Targum Onkelos (Torah) and Targum Jonathan (Prophets) are the two most widely used, both traditionally dated to the early centuries AD though reflecting a longer oral history before being written down.

The Great Commentators

the medieval voices a reader will actually meet on this site

Rashi

Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki · 1040 to 1105, Troyes, France

The single most-read Jewish Bible and Talmud commentator in history. His running, verse-by-verse notes are printed alongside the text in nearly every traditional edition, and a traditional Jewish reader meets him on almost every page he studies. Where this site cites him, it names him and the verse he is commenting on.

Ibn Ezra

Rabbi Abraham ibn Ezra · 1089 to 1164, Spain and travels across Europe

A grammarian and philosopher as much as a commentator. His notes lean on close reading of the Hebrew text itself, and he is more willing than most medieval commentators to flag a verse as textually difficult rather than force a smooth answer.

Ramban

Rabbi Moshe ben Nachman, Nachmanides · 1194 to 1270, Girona, Spain, then Jerusalem

A halakhist, mystic, and public defender of Judaism in the 1263 Barcelona disputation. His Torah commentary often argues directly with Rashi and Ibn Ezra by name, and carries a kabbalistic layer neither of them carries.

Sforno

Rabbi Ovadiah Sforno · 1475 to 1550, Italy

A Renaissance-era physician and philosopher whose commentary reads the text for its plain ethical and rational sense, closer in method to Ibn Ezra than to the mystical strand Ramban carries.

Each of these four wrote a running commentary on the Torah (and in most cases, on other biblical books as well), and their work is still printed alongside the Hebrew text in traditional editions today. Where this site names one of them on a specific verse, it means their actual commentary at that verse, not a general reputation. Naming which commentator holds which reading is part of the honor this wing owes a Jewish reader: these are real names, real centuries, real books, not an undifferentiated “rabbinic tradition.”

One thing this map does not do, and a Christian reader should know it before using any of the literature above. None of these works confesses Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah, and on the verses where that question is live, the readings and this site’s own confession part. This page does not adjudicate those verses; it tells you what you are reading. Where a specific reading meets a specific verse, the parting is named plainly at that verse, and the method is taught in Reading Rabbinic Sources as a Christian. Naming a real difference is not a verdict on the tradition or the men who carry it.

Drafted from the 2026-08-31 research brief. Sourced to named, dated reference works, not the site's own quote pool: The Jewish Study Bible, 2nd ed. (Oxford, ed. Adele Berlin and Marc Zvi Brettler); Jacob Neusner, Introduction to Rabbinic Literature (Doubleday, 1994) and The Mishnah: A New Translation (Yale, 1988); Adin Steinsaltz, The Essential Talmud, rev. ed. (Basic Books, 2006); H.L. Strack and Günter Stemberger, Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash (Fortress, 1996); the Jewish Encyclopedia (1906, public domain) and the Jewish Virtual Library for commentator dates and places. Scripture ASV. Every cited work: the sources registry →