Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.

Judgeschapter 1

36 verses · BSBJudges book hub →

Key verse

After the death of Joshua, the Israelites inquired of the LORD, “Who will be the first to go up and fight for us against the Canaanites?”

It stands in scene A of the chapter, verses 1 to 10.

The chapter

Chapter summary

After Joshua's death Israel asks who shall go up first, and Jehovah answers, Judah shall go up. The chapter opens in strength (Bezek taken, Adoni-bezek repaid in the coin he had used on seventy kings, Hebron and Debir won, Caleb's daughter Achsah asking for the upper and nether springs) and then curdles into a litany of failure. Judah could not drive out the valley dwellers because of their chariots of iron; Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites from Jerusalem; Manasseh, Ephraim, Zebulun, Asher, and Naphtali each left Canaanites in the land, putting them to taskwork instead. The Amorites pressed Dan into the hill country.

Context

History · Samuel · Judges overview

Where the chapter sits

Judges 1 falls in Incomplete conquest; programmatic cycle (chapters 1–2). The tribes fail to drive out the Canaanites; the angel at Bochim; the deuteronomic cycle announced as the book's structuring logic.

After it: The twelve judges, chapters 3–16.

The whole shape of Judges

The world behind this chapter

Judges 1
When
The first years after Joshua · c. 1380 BC, in the generation that buried Joshua
Where
The hill country and coastal plain of Canaan, tribe by tribe, from Jerusalem south to Hebron and north to the valley of Jezreel
Who first heard it
Israelites living among Canaanite neighbors their fathers were told to drive out

The history

Canaan was never one country. It was a patchwork of small walled city-states, each with its own king, its own few hundred acres of farmland, and its own gods. The Amarna letters, clay tablets sent to Egypt's court about a century before this, show those kings writing to Pharaoh, begging for troops and accusing each other of treachery. Israel did not conquer a nation; it moved into a crowded neighborhood of rivals.

The rest of the history, and what it meant to them

Cutting off a captive king's thumbs and big toes, as Israel does to Adoni-bezek, was not random cruelty. A man without thumbs cannot hold a sword or draw a bow, and a man without big toes cannot balance or run. It was a way of permanently disarming a warlord while leaving him alive as a living trophy, and Adoni-bezek says plainly he had done it to seventy others.

The chariots of iron that stop Judah on the plain were not solid iron. They were light two-horse war carts with iron fittings on the wheels, axles, and rails, expensive, fast, and devastating on flat ground. They were useless on the terraced hillsides where Israel settled, which is exactly why the tribes held the ridges and the Canaanites kept the valleys and the coast road.

The chapter's real subject is a list of failures. Again and again the word is not could not but did not drive them out, and instead put them to forced labor. Conscripted labor gangs were standard in the region; a stronger power taxed a weaker one in workdays. Israel chose the profitable arrangement over the commanded one.

What it meant to them

Israelites hearing this read knew every place name on the list, and they knew who still lived there. The chapter is an honest ledger of what their grandfathers left undone, and it explains why there was a Canaanite shrine on the next hill.

It also sets the trap the rest of the book springs. The peoples left in the land are not merely a military problem; they are the neighbors whose gods will be worshiped, whose daughters will be married, and whose customs will be copied.

Sources cited

  • John H. Walton, Victor H. Matthews, and Mark W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament
  • K. A. Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament

Every work MannaFest builds on →

A. Judah goes up first; Adoni-bezek's thumbs and toes

1. (vv. 1-4)

a.After the death of Joshua: The book opens with a question put to God rather than an order handed down, and Albert Barnes notes that the phrase asked the Lord occurs only in Judges and the books of Samuel. The answer names Judah, the tribe of Genesis 49:8, whose hand shall be in the neck of his enemies. The same question is asked once more at 20:18, when the enemy is Benjamin, and the answer is Judah again, so the book opens and closes its warfare with the same tribe going up first. Simeon comes along because Joshua 19:1 and 19:9 place Simeon's inheritance inside Judah's own portion.

Judges 1:1, 2 voicesWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.

Judges 1:1

And in the Book of Joshua, son of Nave, when the land of promise was divided by lot among the other tribes, the tribe of Judah took its own portion of the land without casting lots, and first of all. And, moreover, "After the death of Joshua the children of Israel inquired of the Lord, saying, Who shall go up for us against the Canaanite, leading our fighting against him? And the Lord said, Judah shall go up. Behold, I have given the land into his hands."

Eusebius of Caesarea· written before 339· THE PROOF OF THE GOSPEL 8.1patristic

Judges 1:1

After the death of Joshua - But from Jdg 1:1 to Jdg 2:9 is a consecutive narrative, ending with the death of Joshua. Hence, the events in this chapter and in Jdg 2:1-6 are to be taken as belonging to the lifetime of Joshua. See Jdg 2:11 note. Asked the Lord - The phrase is only found in Judges and Samuel. It was the privilege of the civil ruler, to apply to the high priest to consult for him the Urim and Thummim (marginal reference). (Compare Jos 14:1; Jos 18:1, Jos 18:10; Jos 19:51).

Judges 1:2, 2 voices

Judges 1:2

The Lord said, Judah shall go up - They had inquired of the Lord by Phinehas the high priest; and he had communicated to them the Divine counsel.

Judges 1:2

Judah was first served; the lot came up for Judah first, and therefore Judah must first fight. Judah was the tribe out of which our Lord was to spring: so that in Judah, Christ, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, went before them. Christ engaged the powers of darkness first, and foiled them, which animates us for our conflicts; and it is in him that we are more than conquerors.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Judges 1:3, 1 voice

Judges 1:3

To Simeon - As nearest to him both by relation, being his brother by both parents, and by habitation. The Canaanites - Specially so called, because they are distinguished from the Perizzites, ver. 4.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Judges 1:4, 1 voice

Judges 1:4

The Canaanites and the Perizzites - See Gen 12:6, note; Gen 13:7, note. Bezek may be the name of a district. It has not yet been identified.

2. (vv. 5-8)

a.The captured king of Bezek passes sentence on himself, as I have done, so God hath requited me, and he is the one Canaanite in the book given a line of theology. Seventy kings had gathered their food under his table with their thumbs and great toes cut off, a mutilation that leaves a man unable to grip a sword or run. Thumb and great toe are named together elsewhere in Scripture only in the consecration of the priests and the cleansing of the leper, at Exodus 29:20, Leviticus 8:23 and Leviticus 14:14, where blood is put on both. Verse 8 says Judah took Jerusalem and burned it, and verse 21 says the Jebusites were still living there when this was written, so the city was struck rather than held.

Judges 1:5, 1 voice

Judges 1:5

And they found Adoni-bezek - The word מצא matsa, “he found,” is used to express a hostile encounter between two parties; to attack, surprise, etc. This is probably its meaning here. Adoni-bezek is literally the lord of Bezek. It is very probable that the different Canaanitish tribes were governed by a sort of chieftains, similar to those among the clans of the ancient Scottish Highlanders. Bezek is said by some to have been in the tribe of Judah. Eusebius and St. Jerome mention two villages of this name, not in the tribe of Judah, but about seventeen miles from Shechem.

Judges 1:6, 2 voices

Judges 1:6

Cut off his thumbs - That he might never be able to draw his bow or handle his sword, and great toes, that he might never be able to pursue or escape from an adversary.

Judges 1:6

It had been barbarous thus to triumph over a man in misery, and that lay at their mercy, but that he was a devoted Canaanite, and one that had in like manner abused others, which probably they had heard of. Josephus says, "They cut off his hands and his feet," probably supposing those more likely to be mortal wounds than only the cutting off of his thumbs and his great toes.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Judges 1:7, 2 voices

Judges 1:7

Threescore and ten kings - We may infer from this number of conquered kings, that the intestine wars of the Canaanites were among the causes which, under God’s Providence, weakened their resistance to the Israelites. Adoni-Bezek’s cruelty to the subject kings was the cause of his receiving (compare the marginal references) this chastisement. The loss of the thumb would make a man unfit to handle a sword or a bow; the loss of his big toe would impede his speed.

Judges 1:7

Threescore and ten kings--So great a number will not appear strange, when it is considered that anciently every ruler of a city or large town was called a king. It is not improbable that in that southern region of Canaan, there might, in earlier times, have been even more till a turbulent chief like Adoni-bezek devoured them in his insatiable ambition.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

Judges 1:8, 1 voice

Judges 1:8

Had fought against Jerusalem - We read this verse in a parenthesis, because we suppose that it refers to the taking of this city by Joshua; for as he had conquered its armies and slew its king, Jos 10:26, it is probable that he took the city: yet we find that the Jebusites still dwelt in it, Jos 15:63; and that the men of Judah could not drive them out, which probably refers to the strong hold or fortress on Mount Zion, which the Jebusites held till the days of David, who took it, and totally destroyed the Jebusites.

3. (vv. 9-10)

Judges 1:9-15

a.Verses 10 to 15 repeat Joshua 15:14 to 19 almost word for word, so the same events stand in two books, once as the record of Judah's inheritance and once as the opening of Judah's war. The man who takes Debir is Othniel, who becomes the first judge of Israel at 3:9 with the Spirit of the Lord coming upon him at 3:10, so the book's first deliverer is introduced winning a wife. Achsah is the only person in the chapter who asks for anything, and what she asks for is water, since a field in the south country without springs cannot be worked. Both old names are kept, Hebron called Kirjath-arba and Debir called Kirjath-sepher, which is how these records mark towns that were standing long before Israel came.

Judges 1:9, 1 voice

Judges 1:9

The Canaanites, that dwelt to the mountain - The territories of the tribe of Judah lay in the most southern part of the promised land, which was very mountainous, though towards the west it had many fine plains. In some of these the Canaanites had dwelt; and the expedition marked here was for the purpose of finally expelling them. But probably this is a recapitulation of what is related Jos 10:36; Jos 11:21; Jos 15:13.

B. Othniel wins Achsah, and Achsah asks for water

2. (vv. 16-18)

a.The Kenites are the family of Moses' father in law, invited into Israel's portion at Numbers 10:29 to 32, and they settle in the south without taking a tribe's inheritance. Their presence in the land is what makes Heber the Kenite's tent possible at 4:11, where Jael drives the nail. The city of palm trees they come up from is Jericho, called by that name again at 3:13 and at Deuteronomy 34:3. Gaza, Askelon and Ekron are three of the five Philistine capitals, and all three are in Philistine hands through the rest of Judges and the books of Samuel, so what verse 18 records as taken did not stay taken.

Judges 1:16, 2 voices

Judges 1:16

The children of the Kenite, Moses’ father-in-law - For an account of Jethro, the father-in-law of Moses, see Exodus 18:1-27 (note); Num 10:29 (note), etc. The city of palm trees - This seems to have been some place near Jericho, which city is expressly called the city of palm trees, Deu 34:3; and though destroyed by Joshua, it might have some suburbs remaining where these harmless people had taken up their residence.

Judges 1:16

If he might not himself, his posterity did accept the invitation of Moses (Nu 10:32) to accompany the Israelites to Canaan. Their first encampment was in the "city of palm trees"--not Jericho, of course, which was utterly destroyed, but the surrounding district, perhaps En-gedi, in early times called Hazezon-tamar (Ge 14:7), from the palm-grove which sheltered it.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

Judges 1:17, 1 voice

Judges 1:17

Hormah - See Num 21:1 note. The destruction then vowed was now accomplished. This is another decisive indication that the events here related belong to Joshua’s lifetime. This would be about six years after the vow.

Judges 1:18, 2 voices

Judges 1:18

Judah took Gaza - and Askelon - and Ekron - There is a most remarkable variation here in the Septuagint; I shall set down the verse: Και ουκ εκληρονομησεν Ιουδας την Γαζαν, ουδε τα ὁρια αυτης· ουδε την Ασκαλωνα, ουδε τα ὁρια αυτης· και την Ακκαρων, ουδε τα ὁρια αυτης· την Αζωτον, ουδε τα περισπορια αυτης· και ην Κυριος μετα Ιουδα. “But Judah Did Not possess Gaza, Nor the coast thereof; neither Askelon, nor the coasts thereof, neither Ekron, nor the coasts thereof; neither Azotus, nor its adjacent places: and the Lord was with Judah.” This is the reading of the Vatican and other copies of the Septuagint: but the Alexandrian MS., and the text of the Complutensian and Antwerp Polyglots, agree more nearly with the Hebrew text.

Judges 1:18

Judah took - It is only said, they took the cities, and probably contented themselves with making them tributary; but it is not said that they slew the people, as they ought to have done; and as it is said of the other cities here. And the people being thus spared, did by God's just judgment recover their strength, and expel the Jews out of their cities.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

3. (vv. 19-21)

a.The LORD was with Judah: This is the sentence the book turns on, and it holds two clauses that sit hard against each other, the Lord was with Judah, and Judah could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley. The reason given is iron chariots, the same obstacle the house of Joseph raised at Joshua 17:16 and were answered on at 17:18, and nine hundred of them stand behind Sisera at 4:3 until a river takes them at 5:21. Verse 20 puts both outcomes in one chapter, Caleb expelling the three sons of Anak in the hill country while the plain is left alone. At verse 21 the verb moves from could not to did not, and the tribe named is Benjamin, where Joshua 15:63 tells the same failure of Judah, and both accounts stand as they are written.

Judges 1:19, 3 voices

Judges 1:19

And the Lord was with Judah, and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron - Strange! were the iron chariots too strong for Omnipotence? The whole of this verse is improperly rendered.

Judges 1:19

Could not drive - Because of their unbelief, whereby they distrusted God's power to destroy those who had chariots of iron, and so gave way to their own fear and sloth, whereby God was provoked to withdraw his helping hand.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Judges 1:19

The Chaldee reads it here, as in many other places, The Word of the Lord was their helper, namely, Christ himself, the captain of the Lord's host, now that they acted separately, as well as when they were all in one body.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Judges 1:20, 1 voice

Judges 1:20

And they gave Hebron unto Caleb, as Moses said,.... Which was done in the times of Joshua, both by him and all the people, according to the order of Moses. This is to be understood not of the city which was given to the Levites, but of the fields and parts adjacent, Jos 14:13, and he expelled thence the three sons of Anak: whose names are given Jdg 1:10; this shows that this refers to the same expedition as in Jos 15:14; and is expressed in the same manner.

Judges 1:21, 2 voices

Judges 1:21

And the children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites that inhabited Jerusalem,.... That is, that part of it which belonged to them, for it lay between Judah and Benjamin; and neither of them separately, nor both conjunctly, could drive out the Jebusites from it, particularly the strong hold on the top of Mount Sion, which they held to the times of David.

Judges 1:21

This verse is nearly identical with Jos 15:63, except in the substitution of Benjamin for Judah. Probably the original reading Judah was altered in later times to Benjamin, because Jebus was within the border of Benjamin, and neither had the Benjamites expelled the Jebusites.

C. The long roll of Canaanites not driven out

1. (vv. 22-26)

a.The city is Luz, where Jacob slept and woke and called the place Bethel at Genesis 28:19, so the house of Joseph takes a town its own forefather had named. The scene follows the shape of Joshua 2, with spies, a resident who gives them the way in, a promise of mercy, and a household let go alive when the city falls. Where it parts from Rahab is the ending, since Rahab is brought inside Israel at Joshua 6:25 and stands in the line of Christ at Matthew 1:5, while this man leaves for the land of the Hittites and builds a second Luz. The text records what he did and gives no judgment on him, and none is offered here.

Judges 1:22, 1 voice

Judges 1:22

The house of Joseph, they also went up against Bethel - That is, the tribe of Ephraim and the half tribe of Manasseh, who dwelt beyond Jordan. Beth-el was not taken by Joshua, though he took Ai, which was nigh to it. Instead of בית יוסף beith Yoseph, “the house of Joseph,” ten of Dr. Kennicott’s MSS. and six of De Rossi’s have בני יוסף beney Yoseph, “the children of Joseph;” and this is the reading of both the Septuagint and Arabic, as well as of two copies in the Hexapla of Origen.

Judges 1:23, 1 voice

Judges 1:23

And the house of Joseph sent to descry Bethel,.... To reconnoitre the place, to observe its passes and avenues, which were most accessible, and to examine the walls of it, where they were weakest and least defended: now the name of the city before was Luz; which signifies a "nut"; perhaps it was so called from large numbers of nut trees which grew near it; the Jews suggest as if it was like a nut, no entrance into it but through a cave or some subterraneous passage, see Gen 28:19.

Judges 1:24, 2 voices

Judges 1:24

Show us - the entrance into the city - Taken in whatever light we choose, the conduct of this man was execrable. He was a traitor to his country, and he was accessary to the destruction of the lives and property of his fellow citizens, which he most sinfully betrayed, in order to save his own. According to the rules and laws of war, the children of Judah might avail themselves of such men and their information; but this does not lessen, on the side of this traitor, the turpitude of the action.

Judges 1:24

And here, [1.] He is not to be blamed for giving them this intelligence if he did it from a conviction that the Lord was with them, and that by his donation the land was theirs of right, any more than Rahab was for entertaining those whom she knew to be enemies of her country, but friends of God.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Judges 1:26, 1 voice

Judges 1:26

The land of the Hittites - Probably some place beyond the land of Canaan, in Arabia, whither this people emigrated when expelled by Joshua. The man himself appears to have been a Hittite, and to perpetuate the name of his city he called the new one which he now founded Luz, this being the ancient name of Beth-el.

2. (vv. 27-33)

a.Five tribes are listed in the same form here, Neither did Manasseh, Ephraim, Zebulun, Asher and Naphtali drive out, and the wording weakens as the list runs. Manasseh's towns are Beth-shean, Taanach, Dor, Ibleam and Megiddo, the chain of fortresses across the valley of Jezreel, and Taanach and Megiddo are where Deborah's song puts the battle at 5:19 while Beth-shean is where Saul's body is fastened to the wall at 1 Samuel 31:10. Verse 28 names what Israel did instead of removing them, tribute, which turned a command into a source of income, and 1 Kings 9:20 to 21 says Solomon was still collecting it. At verse 32 the sentence turns over, since it is the Asherites who dwelt among the Canaanites rather than the Canaanites among Israel, and the tribe has become the one living in somebody else's country.

Judges 1:27, 1 voice

Judges 1:27

Beth-shean - Called by the Septuagint Σκυθωνπολις, Scythopolis, or the city of the Scythians. On these towns see the notes, Jos 17:12-13 (note).

Judges 1:29, 1 voice

Judges 1:29

Neither did Ephraim drive out the Canaanites that dwelt in Gezer,.... Not so much as made them tributaries, but made a covenant with them, it is probable, contrary to the express will of God: but the Canaanites dwelt in Gezer among them; the Ephraimites agreeing to it, and here they dwelt to the times of Solomon; See Gill on Jos 16:10; where indeed they are said to be under tribute; but that seems to respect some later time, and not when they were first admitted to dwell among them, since no mention is made of it here.

Judges 1:31, 1 voice

Judges 1:31

Compare the marginal reference. Accho, afterward called Ptolemais, now Akka or St. Jean d’Acre, is named here for the first time.

Judges 1:32, 1 voice

Judges 1:32

It is an evidence of the power of the Canaanite in this portion of the land that it is not said (compare Jdg 1:30) that the Canaanites dwelt among the Asherites, but that the Asherites (and Jdg 1:33, Naphtali) “dwelt among the Canaanites;” nor are the Canaanites in Accho, Zidon, and the other Asherite cities, said to have become tributaries.

3. (vv. 34-36)

a.Dan fails in the other direction, since the Amorites force the tribe up into the mountain and will not suffer them to come down into the valley, so here an Israelite tribe is the one driven out. That pressure is the background of chapters 17 and 18, where Dan sends five men to look for somewhere else to live and takes Laish in the far north. Aijalon and Shaalbim were written into Dan's inheritance at Joshua 19:42, spelled Ajalon and Shaalabbin there, and the house of Joseph has to hold them in Dan's place. The chapter closes on the border of the Amorites rather than on the border of Israel.

Judges 1:34, 1 voice

Judges 1:34

The Amorites forced the children of Dan, etc. - Just as the ancient Britons were driven into the mountains of Wales by the Romans; and the native Indians driven back into the woods by the British settlers in America.

Judges 1:35, 2 voices

Judges 1:35

The Amorites would dwell in Mount Heres - They perhaps agreed to dwell in the mountainous country, being unable to maintain themselves on the plain, and yet were so powerful that the Danites could not totally expel them; they were, however, laid under tribute, and thus the house of Joseph had the sovereignty.

Judges 1:35

In Jacob's blessing Judah is compared to a lion, Dan to a serpent; now observe how Judah with his lion-like courage prospered and prevailed, but Dan with all his serpenting subtlety could get no ground; craft and artful management do not always effect the wonders they pretend to.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Judges 1:36, 1 voice

Judges 1:36

Akrabbim - Of scorpions; probably so called from the number of those animals in that place. From the rock, and upward - The Vulgate understands by סלע sela, a rock, the city Petra, which was the capital of Arabia Petraea. The whole of this chapter appears to be designed as a sort of supplement to those places in the book of Joshua which are referred to in the notes and in the margin; nor is there any thing in it worthy of especial remark.

The text of this chapter

This page carries no textual note on Judges 1. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →

This page draws on Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes; Eusebius of Caesarea, THE PROOF OF THE GOSPEL 8.1; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871); John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765); Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth and Matthew Henry.

Keep studying

On this page

Studies2

On this book