
Matthewchapter 21
46 verses · Matthew, by tradition · AD 50 to 65 · The Gospels
“Say to the Daughter of Zion, ‘See, your King comes to you, gentle and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.’”
Introduction
Matthew, by tradition, The Gospels, Matthew Overview.
Matthew wrote his Gospel for Jewish believers in Jesus, many of them put out of the synagogues of their own towns, and the early church gives it to the tax collector Jesus called. This chapter opens the last week of Jesus' life. Jerusalem is crowded with pilgrims for Passover, and the Roman governor has brought extra troops into the city. Each public act in the chapter makes a claim about who Jesus is. Listen for the prophets He quotes, for the question the rulers put to Him, and for the people each of His stories is aimed at. Read it as the King arriving at His own house.
Context
- Who
- Jewish readers who had walked into that same temple at Passover
- What
- The account of Jesus entering Jerusalem as its King, clearing the temple courts, and answering the rulers who question His authority.
- Where
- The road down the Mount of Olives into Jerusalem, the temple courts, and Bethany, the village where Jesus spent the nights.
- When
- The first days of the last week before the crucifixion, at Passover, in AD 30 or AD 33, since the year is debated.
- Why
- To show Matthew's readers that the King the prophets promised came to His city and that its leaders refused Him.
Historical context
Passover swelled the city enormously. Josephus gives figures for the pilgrim crowds that are certainly inflated, but every source agrees the population multiplied and the surrounding villages filled up. Rome knew it too: the governor came up from the coast with extra troops for the festival, because Passover celebrated a liberation from an empire.
Show the rest of the historical context, 3 more paragraphs
The entry was staged to be read. Riding a donkey rather than a horse quoted Zechariah's prophecy of a king coming humble and mounted on a colt. The branches and the cloaks on the road were how a crowd greeted a victor, and the shout of Hosanna comes from Psalm 118, part of the set of psalms pilgrims sang on the way up.
The money changers had a reason to be where they were, and the reason explains the anger. The temple tax had to be paid in a particular coinage, and pilgrims arrived carrying the currency of a dozen provinces, so exchange was necessary. Animals for sacrifice had to pass inspection, so buying an approved one on site was easier than driving a lamb from Galilee. But the trade was set up in the Court of the Gentiles, the one part of the complex a non-Jew was allowed to enter, and the only place on earth where a Gentile could come to pray. It had been turned into a market.
The tenant parable describes an ordinary arrangement. Absentee landlords owned large Galilean estates and leased them to tenant farmers for a share of the crop, collected by agents. Disputes over that share were common, and violence against collectors was not unknown.
Significance
For Matthew's readers this was the week their leaders decided. The chapter puts the decision on display: the King arrives as prophesied, cleanses the house, and is challenged over his authority by the men who ran it.
Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph
The two parables then say plainly what the reader has been circling. The son who said no and went is the tax collector; the son who said yes and stayed home is the respectable man. And the vineyard will be given to a people producing its fruit, which is why Matthew's community, small and disowned, could believe it stood in the true line.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
Riding into Jerusalem on a Borrowed Colt
Matthew 21:1-3
Bethphage on the Mount of Olives: Bethphage lies on the Mount of Olives, where Zechariah 14:4 says the Lord's feet will stand, and Jesus opens his last week there. He sends two disciples for a donkey tied there, with her colt beside her, and gives them the words the Lord needs them.
Matthew 21:1
“And when they drew nigh unto Jerusalem - They were going up now from Jericho. Mat 20:29. The distance was about 19 miles. The most of the way was a desert, or filled with caves, and rocks, and woods - a suitable place for robbers. See Luk 10:30. The Mount of Olives, or “Olivet,” is on the east of Jerusalem. Between this and Jerusalem there runs a small stream called the brook Kidron, or Cedron. It is dry in the hot seasons of the year, but swells to a considerable size in time of heavy rains.”
1 more voice on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
Matthew 21:1
“And when they drew nigh unto Jerusalem,.... The Syriac, Persic, and Ethiopic versions read, "when he drew nigh, or was near"; but not alone, his disciples were with him, and a multitude of people also; as is evident from the following account.”
a donkey tied there: John Gill takes the village ahead to be Bethany, which lay beside Bethphage, and he records a Jewish tradition that named it Nob. Adam Clarke adds that donkeys and mules were the ordinary animals of Palestine, and horses were rare. Jesus names the tied animal before anyone sees it.
Matthew 21:2
“Ye shall find an ass tied, and a colt - Asses and mules were in common use in Palestine: horses were seldom to be met with. Our blessed Lord takes every opportunity to convince his disciples that nothing was hidden from him: he informs them of the most minute occurrence; and manifested his power over the heart in disposing the owner to permit the ass to be taken away.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
the Lord needs them: Albert Barnes reads the Lord here in its everyday sense of master, the title a servant gives the one he serves, as at Matthew 10:24. The same word elsewhere in the Bible stands for God and for the name YHWH. Barnes keeps to the everyday sense in this verse.
Matthew 21:3
“The Lord hath need of them - This means no more than the “master” has need of them. The word “Lord” often means no more than “master” as opposed to servant, Mat 10:24; Eph 6:5; 1Pe 3:5-6. The word is sometimes used in the Bible as applied to God, or as a translation of the name Yahweh. Its common use is a mere title of respect given by an inferior to a superior, by a servant to a master, by a disciple to a teacher. As a title of “high respect” it was given to Christ, or the Messiah.”
Matthew 21:4-5
spoken through the prophet: Matthew's citation joins Isaiah 62:11, Say to Daughter Zion, to Zechariah 9:9, and reads the two prophets as one word fulfilled on one day. The King comes gentle and riding on a donkey, the animal of peace and labor, where a conqueror would ride a war horse.
Matthew 21:4
“All this was done - The word all, in this clause, is omitted by some MSS., versions, and fathers. Which was spoken - The Spirit of God, which predicted those things that concerned the Messiah, took care to have them literally fulfilled: 1. To show the truth of prophecy in general; and, 2. To designate Christ as the person intended by that prophecy. See the note on Mat 2:23.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Cross references
Matthew 21:4
- QuotingZechariah 9:9“Rejoice greatly, O Daughter of Zion! Shout in triumph, O Daughter of Jerusalem! See, your King comes to you, righteous and victorious, humble and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.”
touto de gegonen hina plerothe to rhethen, triumphal-entry fulfillment frame
gentle and riding on a donkey: The Daughter of Zion is a name for the people of Jerusalem, and Wesley notes the ancient Jewish teachers applied these prophecies to the Messiah. Adam Clarke calls the entry a triumph of humility over pride and worldly grandeur. The King comes gently to a city plotting his death.
Matthew 21:5
“Tell ye the daughter of Sion - The quotation is taken from Zec 9:9, but not in the precise words of the prophet. This entry into Jerusalem has been termed the triumph of Christ. It was indeed the triumph of humility over pride and worldly grandeur; of poverty over affluence; and of meekness and gentleness over rage and malice. He is coming now meek, full of kindness and compassion to those who were plotting his destruction!”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 21:5
“That is, the inhabitants of Jerusalem: the first words of the passage are cited from Isaiah lxii, 11; the rest from Zech. ix, 9. The ancient Jewish doctors were wont to apply these prophecies to the Messiah.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Cross references
Matthew 21:5
- QuotingZechariah 9:9“Rejoice greatly, O Daughter of Zion! Shout in triumph, O Daughter of Jerusalem! See, your King comes to you, righteous and victorious, humble and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.”
'thy King cometh unto thee... upon an ass', triumphal-entry fulfillment formula (w/ Isa 62:11)
ConnectionsZechariah 9:9
Matthew 21:6-7
did as Jesus had directed them: They laid their cloaks on them, and Jesus sat on them. The pronoun is most naturally read of the cloaks rather than of two animals at once. Matthew Henry notes the poverty of the procession: a borrowed colt and borrowed cloaks carry the Son of David into his city.
Matthew 21:6
“This was but a poor piece of state, yet Christ accepted their good-will; and we are hereby taught to contrive how to make Christ welcome, Christ and his grace, Christ and his gospel, into our hearts and houses.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:6
“All of these circumstances surrounding his appearance point to the shape of the future. By means of parabolic signs and by the conditions of present things, the form of the future is here suggested. The Lord is taking possession of the nations! His brightness is approaching! He is occupying the minds of the nations—just as the rider of a beast. He is proclaimed by the entire army of his retinue of patriarchs, prophets and apostles. The patriarchs are spreading their garments, which signify their glory, under the Lord. By their generations, names and struggles, the Lord was prophesied.”
Hilary of Poitiers · written before 367 · Commentary on Matthew 21.2patristic
Matthew 21:6
“But it seems that the Lord could not in so short a distance have sate upon both animals; seeing then that the history has either an impossibility or a meanness, we are sent to higher things, that is, to the figurative sense. The Apostles clothes which are laid upon the beasts may be understood either as the teaching of virtues, or discernment of Scriptures, or verities of ecclesiastical dogmas, with which, unless the soul be furnished and instructed, it deserves not to have the Lord take His seat there.”
Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
laid their cloaks on them: Adam Clarke reads the cloaks as an act of homage, the custom of a people acknowledging a man whom God had appointed king. Pseudo-Chrysostom observes that the Lord had never before made use of an animal to carry him. He rides now on his way to suffer.
Matthew 21:7
“Never before had the Lord employed the services of beasts, nor surrounded Himself with the ornaments of green boughs, till now when He is going up to Jerusalem to suffer. He moved them that beheld to do that which they had before desired to do; so it was opportunity that was now given them, not their purpose that was changed.”
Pseudo-Chrysostom · written before 500 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 21:7
“And put on them their clothes - Thus acknowledging him to be their king, for this was a custom observed by the people when they found that God had appointed a man to the kingdom.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 21:8-9
spread their cloaks on the road: A massive crowd spread their cloaks on the road, the honor Jehu's men gave a new king in 2 Kings 9:13. Their cry takes up Psalm 118:25-26, Hosanna, a Hebrew plea meaning save now, and gives it to the Son of David. Matthew has carried that title since 1:20.
Matthew 21:8
“The multitudes that came out of Jericho, and followed the Saviour, cast down their garments, and strewed the way with branches of trees; and therefore it follows, But the multitudes spread their garments in the way; that is, beneath the feet of the ass, that it should not stumble against a stone, nor tread upon a thorn, nor fall into a ditch. Others cut down branches from the trees, and strewed them in the way; from the fruit-trees, that is, with which mount Olivet was clothed.”
Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:8
“Cut down branches from the trees - Carrying palm and other branches was emblematical of victory and success. See 1 Maccabees 13:51; 2 Maccabees 10:7; and Rev 7:9. The rabbins acknowledge that the prophecy in Zechariah refers to the Messiah; so Rab. Tancum, and Yalcut Rubeni has a strange story about the ass. “This ass is the colt of that ass which was created in the twilight of the sixth day. This is the ass which Abraham found when he went to sacrifice his son.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 21:8
“And a very great multitude,.... Which consisted partly of the great multitude which followed Christ from Jericho, and partly of the much people that were come up to the feast of the passover from divers parts, and met him from Jerusalem; see Joh 12:12. These, many of them, for it cannot be thought to be done by them all, spread their garments in the way; either in the middle of the road, instead of carpets, to ride upon; the Persic version adds, "that he might pass over them": this they did, in honour to him as a king.”
Albert Barnes calls hosanna an acclamation of the Jews, used at their great festivals when the psalms of praise were sung. Henry reads the blessing on his coming in the name of the Lord as a word about his sending, a Son sealed by the Father. Passover was days away.
Matthew 21:9
“And when all that could be done was done, they added also the tribute of the tongue, as it follows, And the multitudes that went before, and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the Son of David. I shall shortly examine what is the meaning of this word Hosanna. In the hundred and seventeenth Psalm, which is clearly written of the Saviour's coming, we read this among other things; Save me now, O Lord; O Lord, send now prosperity. Blessed art thou that art to come in the name of the Lord.”
Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 21:9
“It was foretold concerning this Son of David, that all nations shall call him blessed ( Ps. lxxii. 17 ); these here began, and all true believers in all ages concur in it, and call him blessed; it is the genuine language of faith. Note, First, Jesus Christ comes in the name of the Lord; he is sanctified, and sent into the world, as Mediator; him hath God the Father sealed.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Cross references
Matthew 21:9
- QuotingPsalms 118:26“Blessed is he who comes in the name of the LORD. From the house of the LORD we bless you.”
'Hosanna... Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord'
ConnectionsPsalms 118:26
Matthew 21:10-11
the whole city was stirred: When Jesus had entered Jerusalem, the whole city was stirred. The Greek verb is seio, the shaking word Matthew uses again at the crucifixion and the resurrection. The crowds answer the question Who is this with This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth in Galilee.
Matthew 21:10
“All the city was moved - Or, the whole city was in motion. Εσεισθη, was in a tumult - they saw and heard plainly that the multitude had proclaimed Christ king, and Messiah. Who is this? Who is accounted worthy of this honor?”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
the prophet from Nazareth: Adam Clarke and Jerome both hear the prophet as the one Moses promised at Deuteronomy 18:18. John Wesley notes that Nazareth was a stumbling block, and the people who asked would have found he was born at Bethlehem. Within days the same crowds would cry for his death.
Matthew 21:11
“While others were in doubt or enquiring, the worthless multitude confessed Him; But the people said, This is Jesus the Prophet from Nazareth in Galilee. (Ps. 24:8.) They begin with the lesser that they may come to the greater. They hail Him as that Prophet whom Moses had said should come like to himself, (Deut. 15:18.) which is rightly written in Greek with the testimony of the article, (ὁ προφήτες.) From Nazareth of Galilee, for there He had been brought up, that the flower of the field might be nourished with the flower of all excellencies.”
Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:11
“This is Jesus The Prophet - Ο προφητης That prophet whom Moses spoke of, Deu 18:18. I will raise them up a prophet - like unto thee, etc. Every expression of the multitude plainly intimated that they fully received our blessed Lord as the promised Messiah. - How strange is it that these same people (if the creatures of the high priest be not only intended) should, about five days after, change their hosannas for, Away with him! crucify him! crucify him! How fickle is the multitude!”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 21:11
“This is Jesus from Nazareth - What a stumbling block was this! if he was of Nazareth, he could not be the Messiah. But they who earnestly desired to know the truth would not stumble thereat: for upon inquiry (which such would not fail to make) they would find, he was not of Nazareth, but Bethlehem.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Tables Overturned; Children Crying Hosanna
Matthew 21:12-13
drove out all who were buying and selling: Jesus drove out all who were buying and selling there, in the Court of the Gentiles, the one court a Gentile worshiper could enter. His answer joins Isaiah 56:7, My house will be called a house of prayer, to Jeremiah 7:11's a den of robbers.
Matthew 21:12
“And he cast out all them that sold and bought. It should be known that in obedience to the Law, in the Temple of the Lord venerated throughout the whole world, and resorted to by Jews out of every quarter, innumerable victims were sacrificed, especially on festival days, bulls, rams, goats; the poor offering young pigeons and turtle-doves, that they might not omit all sacrifice. But it would happen that those who came from a distance would have no victim.”
Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:12
“He had cast them out three years before, John ii, 14; bidding them not make that house a house of merchandise. Upon the repetition of the offense, he used sharper words. In the temple - That is, in the outer court of it, where the Gentiles used to worship.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Matthew 21:12
“They sold beasts for sacrifice, for the convenience of those that could more easily bring their money with them than their beast; and they changed money for those that wanted the half shekel, which was their yearly poll, or redemption-money; or, upon the bills of return; so that this might pass for the outward business of the house of God; and yet Christ will not allow of it.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Jerome explains the selling: pilgrims came to the feasts from every quarter with no animals to offer, so men sold bulls, rams, goats and doves. Adam Clarke pictures a den of robbers as one of the caves of Judea where robbers hid. The house of God had become their den.
Matthew 21:13
“My house shall be called the house of prayer - This is taken from Isa 56:7. But ye have made it a den of thieves - This is taken from Jer 7:11. Our Lord alludes here to those dens and caves in Judea, in which the public robbers either hid or kept themselves fortified. They who are placed in the Church of Christ to serve souls, and do it not, and they who enjoy the revenues of the Church, and neglect the service of it, are thieves and robbers in more senses than one.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Cross references
Matthew 21:13
- QuotingIsaiah 56:7I will bring them to My holy mountain and make them joyful in My house of prayer. Their burnt offerings and sacrifices will be accepted on My altar, for My house will be called a house of prayer for all the nations.”
'My house shall be called the house of prayer' (temple cleansing, w/ Jer 7:11)
- QuotingJeremiah 7:11“Has this house, which bears My Name, become a den of robbers in your sight? Yes, I too have seen it, declares the LORD.”
'ye have made it a den of thieves'
Matthew 21:14-16
The blind and the lame came to Him at the temple: , and He healed them in the courts He had just cleared. When the chief priests and scribes were indignant at the children shouting Hosanna to the Son of David, Jesus answered with Psalm 8:2.
Matthew 21:14
“Christ's healing was a real answer to that question, Who is this ? His works testified of him more than the hosannas; and his healing in the temple was the fulfilling of the promise, that the glory of the latter house should be greater than the glory of the former.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
were indignant: Adam Clarke asks what angered the chief priests, and his answer is the cleansing of a profaned temple. The cleansing was their own duty, and Clarke says they had neither the grace nor the influence to do it. Pride and jealousy kept them from letting another do it.
Matthew 21:15
“The chief priests - were sore displeased - Or, were incensed. Incensed at what! At the purification of the profaned temple! This was a work they should have done themselves, but for which they had neither grace nor influence; and their pride and jealousy will not suffer them to permit others to do it.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Jerome observes the care of the answer: Jesus gives the scribes no word to use against him, and lets Scripture defend the children. Adam Clarke notes the same psalm is applied to Christ at 1 Corinthians 15:27, Ephesians 1:22 and Hebrews 2:6. Children often joined public praise among the Jews.
Matthew 21:16
“Out of the mouth of babes - The eighth Psalm, out of which these words are quoted, is applied to Jesus Christ in three other places in the new covenant, 1Co 15:27; Eph 1:22; Heb 2:6. Which proves it to be merely a prophetic psalm, relating to the Messiah. It was a common thing among the Jews for the children to be employed in public acclamations; and thus they were accustomed to hail their celebrated rabbins.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Cross references
Matthew 21:16
- QuotingPsalms 8:2“From the mouths of children and infants You have ordained praise on account of Your adversaries, to silence the enemy and avenger.”
'Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast perfected praise'
ConnectionsPsalms 8:2
where He spent the night: He left them and went out of the city to Bethany, where He spent the night. The pattern holds through the week: days in the temple and nights outside the walls. Bethany was the town of Lazarus, and Jesus taught openly in the temple every day until his hour came.
The Fig Tree That Withered Away
Matthew 21:18-19
as Jesus was returning to the city, He was hungry: In that region the fig forms before the leaf is full, so a tree in leaf promised fruit. He said, May you never bear fruit again, and immediately the tree withered, an acted parable. The vineyard parable and John's warning at 3:10 turn on the same image of fruit owed.
Matthew 21:18
“Now in the morning, as he returned into the city - Which was his custom from the time he wholly left Jerusalem, spending only the day time teaching in the temple; see Mat 21:17. This was probably on Thursday, the 12th day of the month Nisan. He hungered - Probably neither he, nor his disciples, had any thing but what they got from public charity; and the hand of that seems to have been cold at this time.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
found nothing on it except leaves: Adam Clarke notes that the tree stood by the road, on no one's land, so any traveler had the right to its fruit. Matthew Henry reads the withering as a sign of the nation. It withered soon after the crowd at 27:25 called the blood of Jesus down on themselves.
Matthew 21:19
“He saw a fig tree in the way - Επι της οδου, By the road side. As this fig tree was by the way side, it was no private property; and on this account our Lord, or any other traveler, had a right to take of its fruit. For a full explanation of this difficult passage, relative to this emblematic fig tree, see on Mar 11:13 (note), etc. Let no fruit grow on thee - Can a professor, who affords Christ nothing but barren words and wishes, expect any thing but his malediction?”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 21:20-22
The disciples marveled and asked how the fig tree could wither so quickly, and Jesus turned the sign into a lesson on faith. Say to this mountain uses a rabbinic idiom for overcoming what cannot be moved, spoken on the Mount of Olives facing the temple mount.
Matthew 21:20
“But if the Lord come seeking fruit with temptations, and one be found having nought of righteousness but only a profession of faith, which is leaves without fruit, he is soon withered, losing even his seeming faith; and every disciple makes this fig tree to wither, by making it be seen that he is void of Christ, as Peter said to Simon, Thy heart is not right in the sight of God (Acts 8:21.) For it is better that a deceitful fig tree which is thought to be alive, yet brings forth no fruit, should be withered up at the…”
Origen of Alexandria · written before 253 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 21:20
“How soon is the fig tree withered away! - We often say to our neighbors, “How suddenly this man died! Who could have expected it so soon?” But who takes warning by these examples? What we say to-day of Others, may be said to-morrow of Ourselves. Be ye also ready! Lord, increase our faith!”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
say to this mountain: John Wesley sees two aims in the miracle: to strengthen the faith of the disciples and to warn them against bearing no fruit. Adam Clarke notes that the rabbis gave a teacher skilled at solving hard cases the title rooter up of mountains. Jesus made the same promise at 17:20.
Matthew 21:21
“If ye have faith, and doubt not - See on Mat 17:20 (note). Removing mountains, and rooting up of mountains, are phrases very generally used to signify the removing or conquering great difficulties - getting through perplexities. So, many of the rabbins are termed rooters up of mountains, because they were dexterous in removing difficulties, solving cases of conscience, etc. In this sense our Lord’s words are to be understood. He that has faith will get through every difficulty and perplexity; mountains shall become molehills or plains before him.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 21:21
“Jesus answering, said, If ye have faith - Whence we may learn, that one great end of our Lord in this miracle was to confirm and increase their faith: another was, to warn them against unfruitfulness.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Rabanus Maurus names three reasons a prayer goes unanswered: the thing asked may harm the salvation of the one who asks. The stubbornness of the person prayed for may stand in the way, or God may delay the answer so desire grows stronger. Rabanus reads the promise with these limits.
Matthew 21:22
“But whenever we are not heard when we pray, it is either because we ask something adverse to the means of our salvation; or because the perverseness of those for whom we ask hinders its being granted to them; or because the performance of our request is put off to a future time, that our desires may wax stronger, and so may have more perfect capacity for the joys they seek after.”
Rabanus Maurus · written before 856 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
By What Authority Do You Do These Things?
Matthew 21:23-24
The chief priests and elders came up to Him as He taught in the temple courts He had cleared the day before. They asked by what authority He was doing these things. He made his answer depend on theirs, and the dilemma that follows is itself his answer.
Matthew 21:23
“When he was come into the temple, the chief priests came - Who thought he violated their right: and the elders of the people - Probably, members of the sanhedrim, to whom that title most properly belonged: which is the more probable, as they were the persons under whose cognizance the late action of Christ, in purging the temple, would naturally fall.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:23
“Or in these words they urge the same cavil as above, when they said, He casteth out demons through Beelzebub the Prince of the demons. (Mat. 12:24.) For when they say, By what authority doest thou these things? they doubt concerning the power of God, and would have it understood that the things He does are of the Devil. But when they add, Who gave thee this authority? they most clearly deny the Son of God, whom they suppose to work miracles, not by His own, but by others' strength.”
Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
Matthew 21:23
“See also Mar 11:27-33; Luk 20:1-9. Mat 21:23 When he was come into the temple - That is, probably, into the inner court - the court of the Israelites. They took this opportunity of questioning him on this subject when he was not surrounded by the multitude. By what authority ... - There was a show of propriety in this question. He was making great changes in the affairs of the temple, and they claimed the right to know why this was done, contrary to their permission.”
Jerome quotes a proverb for this reply: a hard knot in the wood needs a hard wedge. Jesus could have answered them openly. He asked a question instead, so that their own answer or their silence would condemn them.
Matthew 21:24
“I also will ask you one thing - Our Lord was certainly under no obligation to answer their question: he had already given them such proofs of his Divine mission as could not possibly be exceeded, in the miracles which he wrought before their eyes, and before all Judea; and, as they would not credit him on this evidence, it would have been in vain to have expected their acknowledgment of him on any profession he would make.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 21:25-27
What was the source of John’s baptism?: Jesus asked, What was the source of John’s baptism, from heaven or from men. Either answer cost the leaders: the people's regard, or owning that John came from God. They answered, We do not know, and Jesus withheld his answer on the same terms.
Matthew 21:25
“What then saith He? He doth not answer them directly, to show that, if they had been willing to see His authority, they could; but He asks them again, saying, "The baptism of John, whence is it? From heaven, or of men?" And what sort of inference is this? The greatest surely. For if they had said, from heaven, He would have said unto them, why then did ye not believe him? For if they had believed, they would not have asked these things.”
John Chrysostom · written before 407 · Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 67patristic
4 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:25
“If we shall say, From heaven; he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him?--"Why did ye not believe the testimony which he bore to Me, as the promised and expected Messiah?" for that was the burden of John's whole testimony.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew 21:25
“The baptism of John, whence was it?....”
Matthew 21:25
“The baptism of John - Had John a Divine commission or not, for his baptism and preaching? Our Lord here takes the wise in their own cunning. He knew the estimation John was in among the people; and he plainly saw that, if they gave any answer at all, they must convict themselves: and so they saw, when they came to examine the question. See Mat 21:25, Mat 21:26.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 21:25
“The baptism announced by John formed the subject, even at that time, of a question, proposed by the Lord Himself indeed to the Pharisees, whether that baptism were heavenly, or truly earthly: about which they were unable to give a consistent answer, inasmuch as they understood not, because they believed not.”
Tertullian · written before 220 · On Baptismpatristic
we are afraid of the people: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown point to Luke 20:6, where the leaders fear the people will stone them. They call the council cringing hypocrites. John had been beheaded at 14:10, and the crowds still held him a prophet.
Matthew 21:26
“But if we shall say, Of men; we fear the people--rather, "the multitude." In Luke (Lu 20:6) it is, "all the people will stone us"--"stone us to death." for all hold John as a prophet--Crooked, cringing hypocrites!”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Jerome marks the difference in the two replies. The leaders claim to know nothing, and Jesus, the Truth who cannot lie, says only that he will keep his answer back. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown add that the leaders wanted to reject Christ and keep their name with the people.
Matthew 21:27
“And they answered Jesus, and said, We cannot tell--Evidently their difficulty was, how to answer, so as neither to shake their determination to reject the claims of Christ nor damage their reputation with the people.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Two Sons and the Wicked Vinedressers
Matthew 21:28-30
There was a man who had two sons: Jesus sets the question before he names the people it describes. Verses 31 and 32 name them: the tax collectors and prostitutes who believed John answer to the first son. The leaders who made a fair answer and brought no fruit answer to the second.
Matthew 21:28
“A certain man had two sons - Under the emblem of these two sons, one of whom was a libertine, disobedient, and insolent, but who afterwards thought on his ways, and returned to his duty; and the second, a hypocrite, who promised all, and did nothing; our Lord points out, on the one hand, the tax-gatherers and sinners of all descriptions, who, convicted by the preaching of John and that of Christ, turned away from their iniquities and embraced the Gospel; and, on the other hand, the scribes, Pharisees, and self-righteous people, who, pretending a zeal for the law, would…”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 21:28
“THE father had a right to the services of both his sons, for they were, according to the strict rendering of the word, children, or young men under age. They depended upon him for everything, so they were bound to obey his commands. He did not lay upon them any very heavy tax. He simply asked that they should set to work in his vineyard and go at once, seeing that, probably, there was need for the vines there and then to have their earnest attention.”
Charles Spurgeon · written before 1892 · The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 2747: “Saying Versus Doing” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition)Particular Baptist
he changed his mind and went: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, following Trench, note the rudeness of the first son's answer and his lack of any excuse. Jerome says later work in the vineyard corrected the insolent word. Charles Spurgeon observes that the father had every right to the work of his sons.
Matthew 21:29
“He answered and said, I will not--TRENCH notices the rudeness of this answer, and the total absence of any attempt to excuse such disobedience, both characteristic; representing careless, reckless sinners resisting God to His face.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Jamieson, Fausset and Brown hear self-satisfaction in the emphatic pronoun of the Greek, like the Pharisee of Luke 18:11. They add that this son never meant to go. Jerome sets the reply beside the promise Israel made to Moses at Exodus 24: the yes came easily.
Matthew 21:30
“And he came to the second, and said likewise. And he answered and said, I go, sir--"I, sir." The emphatic "I," here, denotes the self-righteous complacency which says, "God, I thank thee that I am not as other men" (Lu 18:11). and went not--He did not "afterward repent" and refuse to go; for there was here no intention to go.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 21:30
“I go, sir - This is all respect, complaisance, and professed, obedience; but he went not: he promised well, but did not perform. What a multitude of such are in the world, professing to know God, but denying him in their works! Alas! what will such professions avail, when God comes to take away the soul?”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 21:31-32
the tax collectors and prostitutes are entering: Jesus says the tax collectors and prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God before you. He grounds it in a fact: John came to you in a righteous way, and they believed him. The righteousness recalls 5:20, where a righteousness greater than that of the scribes and Pharisees is required.
Matthew 21:31
“The publicans and the harlots - In all their former conduct they had said No. Now they yield to the voice of truth when they hear it, and enter into the kingdom, embracing the salvation brought to them in the Gospel. The others, who had been always professing the most ready and willing obedience, and who pretended to be waiting for the kingdom of God, did not receive it when it came, but rather chose, while making the best professions, to continue members of the synagogue of Satan.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
in a righteous way: Adam Clarke gives two readings of the righteous way. The first has John preaching the truth and living by it. The second, which Clarke prefers, has John coming to a people already walking in righteousness, the Jews set apart from the Gentiles.
Matthew 21:32
“John came unto you in the way of righteousness - Proclaiming the truth, and living agreeably to it. Or, John came unto you, who are in the way of righteousness. This seems rather to be the true meaning and construction of this passage. The Jews are here distinguished from the Gentiles.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 21:33-34
There was a landowner who planted a vineyard: The wording follows the Septuagint of Isaiah 5:2, the song of the vineyard God planted and waited on for fruit. Hearers who knew the song would take the landowner as God, the vineyard as Israel, and the tenants as Israel's leaders. They are answerable for a harvest owed to another.
Matthew 21:33
“He hath planted a vine of which Isaiah speaks, The vine of the Lord of Hosts is the house of Israel. (Isa. 5:7.) And hedged it round about; i. e. either the wall of the city, or the guardianship of Angels. A winepress, that is to say, An altar; or those winepresses after which the three Psalms, the 8th, the 80th, and the 83d are entitled, that is to say, the martyrs. And built a tower therein, that is, the Temple, of which it is said by Micah, And thou, O cloudy tower of the daughter of Sion. (Mic. 4:8.)”
Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 21:33
“A certain householder planted a vineyard - God planted the Church in Canaan; and hedged it round about - First with the law, then with his peculiar providence: and digged a wine press - Perhaps it may mean Jerusalem: and built a tower - The temple: and went into a far country - That is, left the keepers of his vineyard, in some measure, to behave as they should see good.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
his share of the fruit: Adam Clarke explains the rent: a tenant paid with a share of the crop, a custom still kept in his day in the Scottish highlands. He reads the servants as the prophets God sent to call priests and people back. John Gill ties the harvest time to Leviticus 19.
Matthew 21:34
“He sent his servants - Prophets, which, from time to time, he sent to the Jewish nation to call both priests and people back to the purity of his holy religion. Receive the fruits of it - Alluding to the ancient custom of paying the rent of a farm in kind; that is, by a part of the produce of the farm. This custom anciently prevailed in most nations; and still prevails in the highlands of Scotland, and in some other places.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 21:35-39
They beat one, killed another, and stoned a third: The tenants beat one, killed another, and stoned a third, the treatment Israel's prophets had met, and did the same to a larger second company. The owner's hope, They will respect my son, meets their plan, Come, let us kill him and take his inheritance, murder to keep the vineyard.
Matthew 21:35
“Beat one - Εδειραν, took his skin off, flayed him: probably alluding to some who had been excessively scourged. Killed another, etc. - Rid themselves of the true witnesses of God by a variety of persecutions.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
more than the first group: John Gill suggests that the larger second company may stand for those who suffered in the time of the Maccabees. Jerome and Gill both send the reader to Hebrews 11, which records servants of God beaten, stoned and killed by the sword. The owner kept sending.
Matthew 21:36
“Again he sent other servants,.... Meaning, perhaps, such as suffered in the times of the Maccabees: more than the first; their number was greater, though their office was the same, at least not higher: and they did unto them likewise; they beat them with rods, they killed them with the sword, and stoned them, Heb 11:36.”
Adam Clarke reads the Greek verb as shame: the tenants would reflect on their conduct and blush. Jerome asks how the owner, who stands for God, could hope in vain, and answers that the words leave room for human free will. John Gill notes the son comes after every servant.
Matthew 21:37
“But when He says, They will reverence my Son, He does not speak as in ignorance. For what is there that this householder (by whom in this place God is intended) knows not? But God is thus spoken of as being uncertain, in order that free-will may be reserved for man. Let us enquire of Arrius and Eunomius. See here the Father is said not to know somewhat. Whatever answer they make for the Father, let them understand the same of the Son, when He says that He knows not the day of the consummation of all things. (Mat. 22:36.)”
Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:37
“But last of all,.... In the last times, in the last days, in the end of the world, the Jewish world, at the close of their ecclesiastic and civil state; after all the prophets had been sent, and finished their course, came the greatest prophet of all, to seal up the vision and prophecy: he sent unto them son; not a servant as before, but a son; his own son, his only begotten son, the son of his love, his dearly beloved one; him he sent to these husbandmen the Jews.”
Matthew 21:37
“Last of all he sent - his son - This requires no comment. Our Lord plainly means himself. They will reverence - Εντραπησονται, they will reflect upon their conduct and blush for shame because of it, when they see my son. So the Syric and Persic.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Jamieson, Fausset and Brown connect the heir to Hebrews 1:2, where God appointed the Son heir of all things. The tenants want to rise from servants to lords. Origen reads the plot as fulfilled in men who knew Jesus to be the Son of God and crucified him anyway.
Matthew 21:38
“Or we may suppose this fulfilled in the case of those Jews who, knowing Christ, believed in Him. But what follows, But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir, come let us kill him, and let us seize on the inheritance, was fulfilled in those who saw Christ, and knew Him to be the Son of God, yet crucified Him.”
Origen of Alexandria · written before 253 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:38
“This is the heir--Sublime expression this of the great truth, that God's inheritance was destined for, and in due time is to come into the possession of, His own Son in our nature (Heb 1:2). come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance--that so, from mere servants, we may become lords.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew 21:38
“Said among themselves - Alluding to the conspiracies which were then forming against the life of our blessed Lord, in the councils of the Jewish elders and chief priests. See Mat 27:1.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
threw him out of the vineyard: Matthew sets the casting out before the killing, and Mark 12:8 reverses the order. Jerome ties Matthew's order to Hebrews 13, and also reads it as the son thrown out by the tenants and received by the Gentiles. The vineyard would be given to others.
Matthew 21:39
“Cast him out of the vineyard - Utterly rejected the counsel of God against themselves; and would neither acknowledge the authority of Christ, nor submit to his teaching. What a strange and unaccountable case is this! - a sinner, to enjoy a little longer his false peace, and the gratification of his sinful appetites, rejects Jesus, and persecutes that Gospel which troubles his sinful repose.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
3 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:39
“And they caught him,.... Seized and laid hold of him, in a rude and violent manner, as they had some of the servants before.”
Matthew 21:39
“Or, what He says, And cast him out of the vineyard, seems to me to be this; As far as they were concerned they judged Him a stranger both to the vineyard, and the husbandmen. When therefore the Lord of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?”
Origen of Alexandria · written before 253 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
Matthew 21:39
“Christ was cast out of Jerusalem, as out of the vineyard, to His sentence of punishment.”
Hilary of Poitiers · written before 367 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
Matthew 21:40-41
when the owner of the vineyard returns: The leaders pass the sentence themselves: He will bring those wretches to a wretched end. So David condemned the man in Nathan's story of the ewe lamb. Their answer supplies the parable's turn: he will rent out the vineyard, so the vineyard stands and its stewardship passes to others.
Matthew 21:40
“When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh--This represents "the settling time," which, in the case of the Jewish ecclesiastics, was that judicial trial of the nation and its leaders which issued in the destruction of their whole state. what will he do unto those husbandmen?”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew gives this answer to the leaders, and Mark and Luke give the sentence to Jesus, with the hearers in Luke 20:16 protesting against it. Origen compares the leaders to Caiaphas at John 11:49, prophesying against themselves. Adam Clarke dates the fulfillment about forty years later.
Matthew 21:41
“Like Caiaphas (John 11:49) so did they, not from themselves, prophesy against themselves, that the oracles of God were to he taken from them, and given to the Gentiles, who could bring forth fruit in due season.”
Origen of Alexandria · written before 253 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:41
“He will miserably destroy those wicked men - So, according to this evangelist, our Lord caused them to pass that sentence of destruction upon themselves which was literally executed about forty years after. But Luke relates it differently: according to him, they said μη γενοιτο, God forbid! The Codex Leicestrensis omits οι λεγουσιν, they say; so that the following words appear to be spoken by our Lord. Michaelis supposes that in the Hebrew original the word was ויאמר waiomer, he said; for which the Greek translator might have read ויאמרו waiomeru, they said.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 21:41
“But if it was given, as the two other Evangelists agree in representing it, by our Lord Himself, and the explicitness of the answer would seem to favor that supposition, then we can better explain the exclamation of the Pharisees which followed it, in Luke's report (Lu 20:16) --"And when they heard it, they said, God forbid"--His whole meaning now bursting upon them.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew 21:42-44
Jesus answers with Psalm 118:22-23, from the psalm the crowd sang at his entry. The kingdom given to a people who will produce its fruit is read of that generation's rulers or of the church of Jew and Gentile. Romans 11:2 says God did not reject His people.
Matthew 21:42
“Did ye never read in the scriptures-- (Ps 118:22, 23). The stone which the builders rejected, &c.--A bright Messianic prophecy, which reappears in various forms (Isa 28:16, &c.), and was made glorious use of by Peter before the Sanhedrim (Ac 4:11).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 21:42
“The builders - The scribes and priests, whose office it was to build up the Church. Is become the head of the corner - Or the chief corner stone: he is become the foundation of the Church, on which the whole building rests, and is the principal corner stone, for uniting the Gentiles to it, as the chief corner stone of a house supports and links its two sides together.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Cross references
Matthew 21:42
- QuotingPsalms 118:22“The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone.”
'The stone which the builders rejected' ('did ye never read in the scriptures')
ConnectionsPsalms 118:22
will produce its fruit: Adam Clarke reads the opening therefore as a word that fixes the parable on its hearers alone. The fruit recalls the rent paid in kind at verse 34, a share of the harvest handed to the owner. Jerome reads the kingdom here as the holy Scriptures.
Matthew 21:43
“Therefore say I - Thus showing them, that to them alone the parable belonged. The kingdom of God shall be taken from you - the Gospel shall be taken from you, and given to the Gentiles, who will receive it, and bring forth fruit to the glory of God. Bringing forth the fruits - As in Mat 21:34 an allusion is made to paying the landlord in kind, so here the Gentiles are represented as paying God thus.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
will be broken to pieces: Jerome distinguishes the two falls: a sinner who still believes falls on the stone and is broken, yet repentance preserves him. The one who denies Christ is crushed when the stone falls on him. Adam Clarke hears an allusion to the Jewish punishment of stoning.
Matthew 21:44
“The 44th verse should certainly come before Mat 21:43, otherwise the narration is not consecutive. Mat 21:42. The stone which the builders rejected, is become the head of the corner, etc. Mat 21:44. Whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken, etc. This is an allusion to the punishment of stoning among the Jews.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 21:44
“And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder--The Kingdom of God is here a Temple, in the erection of which a certain stone, rejected as unsuitable by the spiritual builders, is, by the great Lord of the House, made the keystone of the whole.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew 21:45-46
they knew that Jesus was speaking about them: When the chief priests and Pharisees heard His parables, they knew that Jesus was speaking about them, their own sentence of verse 41 still spoken. The fear of the people that kept them from answering about John's baptism at verse 26 now holds back their hands.
Matthew 21:45
“The chief priests - perceived that he spoke of them - The most wholesome advice passes for an affront with those who have shut their hearts against the truth. When that which should lead to repentance only kindles the flame of malice and revenge, there is but little hope of the salvation of such persons.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
4 more voices on this verse
Matthew 21:45
“What then ought they to have done on hearing these things? ought they not to have adored, to have marvelled at the tender care, that shown before, that afterwards? But if by none of these things they were made better, by the fear of punishment at any rate ought they not to have been rendered more temperate? But they did not become so, but what do they after these things? "When they had heard it," it is said, "they perceived that He spake of them.”
John Chrysostom · written before 407 · Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 68patristic
Matthew 21:45
There follows the time of malice: "and when they had heard, they knew that he spoke of them."
Thomas Aquinas · written before 1274 · Commentary on Matthewpatristic
Matthew 21:45
“This, that they are afraid to lay hands on Jesus because of the multitudes, is daily acted in the Church, when any who is a brother only in name, is ashamed or afraid to assail the unity of faith and peace which he does not love, because of the good men with whom he lives.”
Rabanus Maurus · written before 856 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
Matthew 21:45
“Hard as were the hearts of the Jews in unbelief, they yet perceived that the Lord's sentence was directed against themselves.”
Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
they were afraid of the crowds: Luke 20:19 adds that they wanted to seize him that very hour, and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown read in it a rage barely held back. Jerome notes that the leaders could deny none of the charges the parables laid on them. Their answer was a plan to kill.
Matthew 21:46
“But when they sought to lay hands on him--which Luke (Lu 20:19) says they did "the same hour," hardly able to restrain their rage. they feared the multitude--rather, "the multitudes." because they took him for a prophet--just as they feared to say John's baptism was of men, because the masses took him for a prophet (Mt 21:26).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Keep studying
Studies12
People and groups1
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The context
Charles Spurgeon, The Treasury of David on Psalm 118 and Franz Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Prophecies of Isaiah.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 2747: “Saying Versus Doing” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition); Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jerome; John Calvin, Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists; John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew; John Gill; John Lightfoot, Horae Hebraicae et Talmudicae on Matthew; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Origen of Alexandria, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Pseudo-Chrysostom, Catena Aurea by Aquinas and Rabanus Maurus, Catena Aurea by Aquinas.
The painting
The Triumphal Entry into Jerusalem, Gustave Doré (engraving), public domain
