Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Abram's household on the road out of Ur toward Canaan, with the flocks, the servants and Sarai on the donkey, Genesis 12:5

Place

Ur

József Molnár, The March of Abraham, 1850. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Abram's household on the road out of Ur toward Canaan, with the flocks, the servants and Sarai on the donkey, Genesis 12:5

József Molnár, The March of Abraham, 1850. Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Summary

The city of the moon god in southern Mesopotamia that Abram was called out of, the place Scripture names as Ur of the Chaldees and Stephen names as the land where the God of glory first appeared to him.

  • Ur is the city God called Abram out of, and Scripture names it four times.
  • Joshua 24:2 says Terah worshiped other gods, so the family God chose did not already know Him.
  • At the covenant, God introduces Himself to Abram by what He did at Ur.
  • Leonard Woolley dug the city from 1922 to 1934 and found a temple tower, a moon cult, a law code older than Hammurabi's and a royal graveyard full of gold.
  • Where Ur stood is disputed. The southern mound of Tell el-Muqayyar is the majority reading, and a northern candidate near Şanlıurfa has real defenders.

Where it is

the country around it

Region
Southern Mesopotamia
The EuphratesThe TigrisUr30 km · 19 miN
  • Located: the gazetteer fixes one site

Not located: Egypt, Canaan. The gazetteer records no location for them, so they are not marked.

Ur and the country around it, about 110 km across. The Euphrates and the Tigris are drawn from Natural Earth's public-domain outlines. Every mark sits at the coordinates the gazetteer records for it.

Why Ur matters

Ur was a real city in southern Mesopotamia, on an old course of the Euphrates. It had a stepped temple tower, a harbour, a school, a royal graveyard and a written law code three centuries older than Hammurabi's. Scripture names the city four times and never describes it. Everything a reader knows about what Ur looked like comes out of the ground. The Bible's line of promise begins here, and it begins outside the promise. Joshua told all Israel at Shechem that Terah, the father of Abraham and Nahor, lived beyond the Euphrates and worshiped other gods. The family God chose was not a family that already knew Him. Genesis 11:31 has Terah take Abram, Lot and Sarai out of Ur for the land of Canaan. They reached Haran and settled there, short of where they were going. Terah died in Haran, and Abram went the rest of the way at seventy-five. God dates His own relationship with Abram from this city. When He makes the covenant He says, "I am the LORD, who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to possess." Nehemiah's Levites pray that sentence back to Him a thousand years later, and neither verse mentions Haran. One small thing trips up almost every reader. The brother who died in Ur and the town where the family stopped are two different Hebrew words, spelled differently and said differently, and English writes both of them Haran. The town was not named for the brother. What Abram walked away from was a walled city with a tower whose lowest stage is still standing four thousand years later. He spent the rest of his life in tents. Hebrews says what he was waiting for: the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God.

What has been found

the evidence, and where it is disputed

Where Ur stood is the live question on this page, and the text under-determines the answer. Genesis 11:31 has the family set out from Ur and arrive at Haran, which puts some travelling distance between the two. Acts 7:2 has God appear to Abraham in Mesopotamia before he lived in Haran. Genesis 24:10 sends the servant back to Nahor's town in Aram-naharaim, the country of the two rivers, in the north. Those three verses are the whole biblical evidence for an address. The majority identification is the southern city, Tell el-Muqayyar. Its strengths are that the mound is certainly the ancient city of Ur, named in its own foundation deposits; that Ur was a famous and well-connected place in the right millennium; and that the phrase "of the Chaldeans" fits southern Babylonia, where the Kaldu tribes are attested. Alan R. Millard made that case in "Where Was Abraham's Ur? The Case for the Babylonian City," Biblical Archaeology Review 27:3 (2001), and stated it carefully: the case is strong, and the available information precludes certainty. The map pin on this page follows this reading. A northern Ur has real defenders. Cyrus H. Gordon argued in "Abraham and the Merchants of Ura," Journal of Near Eastern Studies 17 (1958), that Abraham's Ur belonged in the region of Urha, later Edessa and today Şanlıurfa, about forty kilometres from Harran. The arguments run that the patriarchal narratives keep sending the family back to Haran and Aram-naharaim and never back south, that Stephen's Mesopotamia is the northern country in ordinary Greek usage, and that a southern Ur makes the family's route a long detour. Hershel Shanks put the northern case to a wide readership in "Abraham's Ur: Is the Pope Going to the Wrong Place?", Biblical Archaeology Review 26:1 (2000), and Millard was answering him. The reading is older than either. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown glossed Genesis 11:28 in 1871, before any excavation had settled anything, with "Ur--now Orfa; that is, \"light,\" or \"fire.\" Its name probably derived from its being devoted to the rites of fire-worship." Adam Clarke, writing in 1832, was blunter about how little was known: "Ur appears to have been a city of some considerable consequence at that time in Chaldea; but where situated is not well known." At Şanlıurfa a cave in the city has long been pointed to as Abraham's birthplace by Jewish, Christian and Muslim communities there. That is a tradition, and it is named here as one. What no one disputes is that Abraham's family came from Mesopotamia, moved through Haran, and left for Canaan from there. Leonard Woolley's teams cleared more than 1,800 graves at Ur, sixteen of which he classed as royal tombs. The tomb of Puabi, grave PG 800, was found undisturbed: a royal woman known by name from her own cylinder seal, with a gold headdress, a cloak of carnelian and lapis lazuli beads, and gold vessels. The Great Death Pit, grave PG 1237, cleared in the 1929 to 1930 season, held seventy-three attendants laid out in rows, which Woolley read as retainers who went into the grave with their ruler. Later re-examination of skulls from the cemetery, published by the University of Pennsylvania Museum, argued that at least some of them died from a blow to the head rather than from a sedative, which changes how they died and not the fact that they were buried there. The Standard of Ur, an inlaid box in shell, lapis and red limestone with a war panel and a peace panel, came from grave PG 779. So did the pair of statuettes known as the Ram in a Thicket, and the bull-headed lyres, whose decayed wooden frames Woolley recovered by pouring plaster into the voids they had left in the soil. This site holds no photograph of those objects, no image of the tower and no map of Mesopotamia, so the page describes them in words rather than borrowing a picture of somewhere else. The tower was built for the moon. Ur-Nammu raised it around 2100 BC and his son Shulgi finished it, for Nanna, called Sin in Akkadian, with the goddess Ningal beside him. The lowest stage survives and its baked-brick facing carries Ur-Nammu's name. Nabonidus rebuilt the upper stages in the sixth century BC, installed his daughter Ennigaldi-Nanna as high priestess of the moon god at Ur in 547 BC, and restored the moon temple at Harran as well, where his mother Adad-guppi had served Sin all her life. Ur and Haran are the two ends of one cult, and Genesis has Terah's household move from the first to the second. That pattern is in the evidence, and the page reports it as a pattern. Scripture never names the gods Terah served, no excavated object at Ur names them either, and so this page holds the two facts side by side instead of combining them into a claim. In the priestess's residence Woolley found a room of older objects labelled in three languages on a clay drum, collected under Ennigaldi-Nanna, and it is often described as the earliest known museum. The Code of Ur-Nammu comes from the same dynasty that built the tower, around 2100 BC, and is the oldest surviving law code known. Samuel Noah Kramer translated two fragments from Nippur in 1952, which gave the prologue and five laws, and further tablets from Ur published in 1965 brought about thirty of the fifty-seven laws into view. It predates the Code of Hammurabi by roughly three centuries. What that shows is that written law existed in Abraham's part of the world long before Moses, in the very city Genesis names. What it does not show is that Moses copied anything, and the argument about what a parallel proves is worked through on this site's page on the ancient Near East. In the 1928 to 1929 season Woolley cut a deep pit below the cemetery and found a bed of water-laid silt about three metres thick, with occupation above it and below it. He announced it as the flood of Genesis, the press carried it that way in 1929, and he set it out for a general readership in Ur of the Chaldees the same year and returned to it in Abraham: Recent Discoveries and Hebrew Origins in 1936. Flood deposits then turned up at Kish, Shuruppak, Uruk and Nineveh, and when they were compared they did not line up: the silt beds sit at different stratigraphic levels and so record different floods at different dates. Woolley's own silt does not extend across the whole site of Ur, let alone across the plain. Max Mallowan, who had worked with Woolley at Ur, reviewed the whole question in "Noah's Flood Reconsidered," Iraq 26 (1964), and while he held that a memory of a real and severe inundation stands behind the Mesopotamian flood traditions, he did not sustain Woolley's identification of the Ur silt as the biblical deluge. That is where the field has stood since. The silt is real, it was laid down by water, and it buried a settlement; what it is not is a basin-wide layer that can be matched to Genesis 6 to 9. The wider question belongs to this site's page on the flood. One house at Ur is shown to visitors today as Abraham's house, and the label is modern. What Woolley excavated there was a residential quarter of the Isin-Larsa and Old Babylonian period, roughly 1900 to 1700 BC, with narrow lanes, courtyard houses of baked and mud brick, some of two storeys, a family chapel and burials beneath the floors. That is genuinely how a family of that period in that city lived, and Woolley said as much. No inscription, object or text ties any house at Ur to Abraham or to Terah, and no excavator has claimed one. The name itself raises two questions. The Hebrew city name and the Hebrew word for flame share their consonants, which is two different words with one spelling, and that single fact is the root of the whole fire-of-the-Chaldeans tradition below; modern Assyriology reads the city name as the Sumerian Urim, unrelated to the word for flame. The second question is the date of the word Chaldeans. The Kaldu appear in Assyrian records in the early ninth century BC, first in the annals of Ashurnasirpal II, who reigned from about 883 to 859 BC, more than a thousand years after any date proposed for Abraham. Three readings are held. Some treat the phrase as a later note identifying the region for readers who would not have known the bare name Ur, the way an English writer adds a country to a town, and Woolley took it that way himself. Critical scholarship has used the phrase as a marker for a first-millennium hand in the Genesis text; this page names that position and does not adopt it. Millard argued that it is not an anachronism at all, since the southern territory carried the name Kaldu from the early first millennium, regions in Mesopotamia were normally named for the tribes living in them, and no earlier general name for that region is known. A related conservative reading connects Kasdim to Kesed, a son of Abraham's brother Nahor named at Genesis 22:22, and the objection to it belongs on the page too: Genesis 11:28 already calls the city Ur of the Chaldeans before Kesed is born, so that connection has to be retrospective naming rather than derivation.

The call of Abram out of Ur

Genesis 11:27 to 12:5, and the covenant that names the city

Read Genesis 11:27 to 12:5, and the covenant that names the city
  1. Terah's household, namedGenesis 11:27This is the account of Terah. Terah became the father of Abram, Nahor, and Haran. And Haran became the father of Lot.
  2. Haran dies in the cityGenesis 11:28During his father Terah’s lifetime, Haran died in his native land, in Ur of the Chaldeans.
  3. Sarai is barren, and the text says so before the promiseGenesis 11:30But Sarai was barren; she had no children.
  4. Terah takes the family out of Ur for CanaanGenesis 11:31And Terah took his son Abram, his grandson Lot son of Haran, and his daughter-in-law Sarai the wife of Abram, and they set out from Ur of the Chaldeans for the land of Canaan. But when they arrived in Haran, they settled there.
  5. The stop becomes a stay, and Terah diesGenesis 11:32Terah lived 205 years, and he died in Haran.
  6. The word to AbramGenesis 12:1Then the LORD said to Abram, “Leave your country, your kindred, and your father’s household, and go to the land I will show you.
  7. All the families of the earthGenesis 12:3I will bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you; and all the families of the earth will be blessed through you.”
  8. Abram goes, at seventy-fiveGenesis 12:4So Abram departed, as the LORD had directed him, and Lot went with him. Abram was seventy-five years old when he left Haran.
  9. God names the city when He makes the covenantGenesis 15:7The LORD also told him, “I am the LORD, who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to possess.”
  10. What faith looked like from the insideHebrews 11:8By faith Abraham, when called to go to a place he would later receive as his inheritance, obeyed and went, without knowing where he was going.

Genesis 12:1 gives the word after the family has already settled in Haran. Acts 7:2 says the God of glory appeared to Abraham in Mesopotamia before he lived in Haran, and Genesis 15:7 and Nehemiah 9:7 both say God brought him out of Ur. The readings of that difference are set out in the questions below.

The Abrahamic Covenant: the full study

What happened here, in order

in the order the canon tells it

  1. Abram and Nahor marry in UrGenesis 11:29And Abram and Nahor took wives for themselves. Abram’s wife was named Sarai, and Nahor’s wife was named Milcah; she was the daughter of Haran, who was the father of both Milcah and Iscah.
  2. The road out of Haran ends in CanaanGenesis 12:5And Abram took his wife Sarai, his nephew Lot, and all the possessions and people they had acquired in Haran, and set out for the land of Canaan. When they came to the land of Canaan,
  3. Abram believes God, one verse before Ur is namedGenesis 15:6Abram believed the LORD, and it was credited to him as righteousness.
  4. The man who left Ur is given a new nameGenesis 17:5No longer will you be called Abram, but your name will be Abraham, for I have made you a father of many nations.
  5. Abraham forbids taking Isaac back to the old countryGenesis 24:6Abraham replied, “Make sure that you do not take my son back there.
  6. Abraham calls God the One who brought him from his native landGenesis 24:7The LORD, the God of heaven, who brought me from my father’s house and my native land, who spoke to me and promised me on oath, saying, ‘To your offspring I will give this land’—He will send His angel before you so that you can take a wife for my son from there.
  7. The servant goes back to Nahor's town in Aram-naharaimGenesis 24:10Then the servant took ten of his master’s camels and departed with all manner of good things from his master in hand. And he set out for Nahor’s hometown in Aram-naharaim.
  8. Laban swears by a different god from Jacob'sGenesis 31:53May the God of Abraham and the God of Nahor, the God of their father, judge between us.” So Jacob swore by the Fear of his father Isaac.
  9. The LORD says Terah worshiped other godsJoshua 24:2And Joshua said to all the people, “This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: ‘Long ago your fathers, including Terah the father of Abraham and Nahor, lived beyond the Euphrates and worshiped other gods.
  10. But I took your father AbrahamJoshua 24:3But I took your father Abraham from beyond the Euphrates and led him through all the land of Canaan, and I multiplied his descendants. I gave him Isaac,
  11. Israel is told to cast the old gods asideJoshua 24:14Now, therefore, fear the LORD and serve Him in sincerity and truth; cast aside the gods your fathers served beyond the Euphrates and in Egypt, and serve the LORD.
  12. The returned exiles name Ur in prayerNehemiah 9:7You are the LORD, the God who chose Abram, who brought him out of Ur of the Chaldeans and gave him the name Abraham.
  13. Look to Abraham your father, who was but oneIsaiah 51:2Look to Abraham your father, and to Sarah who gave you birth. When I called him, he was but one; then I blessed him and multiplied him.
  14. Stephen puts the appearing in Mesopotamia, before HaranActs 7:2And Stephen declared: “Brothers and fathers, listen to me! The God of glory appeared to our father Abraham while he was still in Mesopotamia, before he lived in Haran,
  15. He left the land of the Chaldeans and settled in HaranActs 7:4So Abraham left the land of the Chaldeans and settled in Haran. After his father died, God brought him out of that place and into this land where you are now living.
  16. The city he was actually looking forHebrews 11:10For he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God.

Where it points

Ur's public religion served the moon, and Nehemiah's Levites put two sentences side by side that a reader should hold together. They praise the God who made the heavens with all their host, and then in the next breath they praise Him for bringing Abram out of Ur. The One who called Abram was not one god among the city's gods. He made the thing the city worshipped. Grace comes first here, and the order is in the text. Genesis 15:7 has God introduce Himself by the bringing out. Joshua 24:2 and 24:3 have Him say that the fathers worshiped other gods, and then, "But I took your father Abraham." Paul reads the same order in Romans 4:5, where God justifies the ungodly. Matthew Henry drew that line himself in 1710, and he drew it about Israel and Israel's own fathers, telling them to remember the rock they were hewn from. The blessing of Genesis 12:3 runs out to the nations without running Israel out, and Romans 4:11 to 4:12 makes Abraham the father of both the uncircumcised who believe and the circumcised who walk in his faith. Genesis 15:6 sits between the call and the covenant sign: Abram believed the LORD, and it was credited to him as righteousness. Romans 4:10 to 4:11 makes that sequence the argument, since the crediting came while he was still uncircumcised. Galatians 3:8 says the gospel was preached to Abraham in advance in the promise that all nations would be blessed through him. Abraham left a walled city with a tower whose lowest stage is still standing four thousand years later, and lived the rest of his life in tents. Hebrews 11:9 to 11:10 says what he was doing. John Wesley's note on the verse in 1755 is one sentence long: "He looked for a city which hath foundations - Whereas a tent has none." Hebrews 11:13 to 11:16 turns that leaving into the shape of a believing life. These people died without receiving what they were promised, called themselves strangers and exiles, had every opportunity to go back to the country they had left, and did not take it. Adam Clarke read Abraham's refusal in Genesis 24:6 the same way in 1832, tying the promise to a settled renunciation of Chaldea. The earliest Christian reading of the call on this page is Clement of Rome, writing to Corinth about AD 96. He quotes Genesis 12 in full and says that Abraham "in the exercise of obedience, went out from his own country, and from his kindred, and from his father's house, in order that, by forsaking a small territory, and a weak family, and an insignificant house, he might inherit the promises of God." Clement then joins the going out directly to Genesis 15:6 and to the offering of Isaac, holding the three together within a lifetime of the apostles. The city Abraham was waiting for arrives at the end of the book, with its foundations named and its wall measured, and this site carries that thread on its own page.

The voices

each quoted from the work named

I am the Lord that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees - Out of the fire of the Chaldees, so some: that is, from their idolatries; for the Chaldeans worshipped the fire. Or, from their persecutions. The Jewish writers have a tradition, that Abram was cast into a fiery furnace for refusing to worship idols, and was miraculously delivered.
John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765), on Genesis 15:7
Abraham’s family was originally an idolatrous one; afterwards some beams of light shone in upon the household, and they became worshippers of the true God; but there was much ignorance mingled with their worship, and at least occasionally their old idolatrous habits returned. The Lord who had always fixed on Abraham to be his chosen servant and the father of his chosen people upon earth, made Abraham leave the society of his friends and relatives, and go out of Ur of the Chaldees, and journey away to the land of Canaan,
Charles Spurgeon, The New Park Street Pulpit, Sermon No. 261: “The Call of Abraham” (1859), on Hebrews 11:8
It is not stated that Abraham himself was an idolater, though his fathers were. Jewish tradition asserts that Abraham while in Ur of the Chaldees was persecuted for his abhorrence of idolatry, and hence, was called away by God from his native land. The reference in the text to the original state of those who were the forefathers of the nation, is made to show that they were no better than others: God chose them not for their excellences but of His own mere motion.
Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1868), on Joshua 24:2
4 more teachers on these versesJohn Chrysostom · Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Matthew Henry · John Wesley
Is sacred Scripture inconsistent with itself? Not at all; rather, you need to understand from this that since the son was God-fearing, God appeared to him and called upon him to move there. His father Thara, though he happened to be a heathen, nevertheless for the affection he had for his son agreed to accompany him in his migration.
John Chrysostom, Homilies on Genesis 31.7 (407), on Genesis 11:31
appeared unto our father Abraham before he dwelt in Charran, and said, &c.--Though this first call is not expressly recorded in Genesis, it is clearly implied in Ge 15:7 and Ne 9:7; and the Jewish writers speak the same language.
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871), on Acts 7:2 to 7:5
God's favour to him was distinguishing: "Thou didst choose him." His grace in him was powerful to bring him out of Ur of the Chaldees, and, in giving him the name of Abraham, he put honour upon him as his own and assured him that he should be the father of many nations. Look unto Abraham your father ( Isa. li. 2 ) and see free grace glorified in him.
Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710), on Nehemiah 9:7
He looked for a city which hath foundations - Whereas a tent has none. Whose builder and former is God - Of which God is the sole contriver, former, and finisher.
John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755), on Hebrews 11:10

Ur in Scripture

5 verses name it, in 3 books

Open a book to read its mentions here. Text: Berean Standard Bible.

Old TestamentNew Testamentsegment width = share of mentions

The account

Read the account as one telling
The Chaldean city from which God calls Abram (Gen 11:31; 12:1) — the starting point of the journey of faith toward the land of promise.

Common questions

Where was Ur of the Chaldeans?

Readers differ; the positions are named

The majority identification is Tell el-Muqayyar in southern Iraq, the mound whose own foundation cylinders name the city of Ur. Alan Millard argued that case in Biblical Archaeology Review in 2001 while saying plainly that certainty is not available. Cyrus Gordon argued in 1958 that Abraham's Ur was a northern town near Harran, in the region of Urha, today Şanlıurfa, and Hershel Shanks put that case to a wide readership in 2000.

The text gives three constraints and no address: the family left Ur and reached Haran, Stephen says God appeared to Abraham in Mesopotamia before Haran, and the servant later goes back to Aram-naharaim in the north. The map pin on this page follows the majority reading.

Was Abraham's family really idol worshippers?

Readers differ; the positions are named

Joshua 24:2 is the LORD's own statement that Terah, the father of Abraham and Nahor, lived beyond the Euphrates and worshiped other gods, and Joshua 24:14 tells Israel to cast those gods aside seven generations later.

Scripture never says whether Abram himself served them before the call. Adam Clarke thought he probably did. Albert Barnes pointed out that the text does not state it, though his fathers did. Both readings stand on this page and neither is settled here.

Did God call Abraham in Ur or in Haran?

Readers differ; the positions are named

Genesis 12:1 gives the word after the family has already settled in Haran, while Acts 7:2 says the God of glory appeared to Abraham in Mesopotamia before he lived in Haran, and Genesis 15:7 and Nehemiah 9:7 both say God brought him out of Ur.

The oldest answer on this page is two calls. John Chrysostom, about 407, held that God appeared to Abram in Chaldea and that Terah went along out of affection for his son, and Adam Clarke set out the same two-call reading in 1832. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown put it in one line: the first call is not expressly recorded in Genesis but is clearly implied in Genesis 15:7 and Nehemiah 9:7. Others read one call, reported at Haran by Moses and dated earlier by Stephen.

Why does the Bible call it Ur of the Chaldeans if the Chaldeans came much later?

Readers differ; the positions are named

The Kaldu appear in Assyrian records in the early ninth century BC, in the annals of Ashurnasirpal II, more than a thousand years after any date proposed for Abraham. Three readings are held.

Some treat the phrase as a later note identifying the region for readers who would not know the bare name, the way a modern writer adds a country to a town, and Leonard Woolley took it that way. Some treat it as evidence that the text reached its present form in the first millennium. Alan Millard argued that it is not an anachronism at all, since the territory carried the name Kaldu from the early first millennium, regions there were named for the tribes in them, and no earlier general name for that region is known. A related conservative reading connects the name to Kesed, a son of Abraham's brother Nahor at Genesis 22:22, applied to the region in retrospect.

Was Abraham thrown into a fiery furnace?

Scripture does not say so. The story attaches to this verse because of a matter of spelling: the Hebrew city name and the Hebrew word for flame share their letters, and they are two different words. Jerome, writing about 420, records both the reading "the fire of the Chaldeans" and the legend the Hebrews relate about Abraham being thrown into the fire for refusing to worship it.

The fullest form is in Bereshit Rabbah 38:13, a Jewish midrash on Genesis compiled in the land of Israel around AD 400 to 500, where Nimrod casts Abraham into a furnace and Haran dies in it, which is that tradition's way of reading Genesis 11:28. An earlier Second Temple book, Jubilees 12, written in the second century BC, has Abram burn a house of idols and Haran die in the fire trying to save them. Both are named, dated and placed here as reception history rather than Scripture.

What did Woolley find at Ur, and did he find Noah's flood?

Readers differ; the positions are named

Leonard Woolley excavated Ur for the British Museum and the University of Pennsylvania Museum from 1922 to 1934 and cleared more than 1,800 graves, including the tomb of Puabi, the Great Death Pit, and the objects now known as the Standard of Ur and the Ram in a Thicket. In 1928 and 1929 he cut below the cemetery, found a bed of water-borne silt about three metres thick, and announced it as the flood of Genesis.

Flood deposits found at Kish, Shuruppak, Uruk and Nineveh turned out to sit at different stratigraphic levels, so they record different floods at different dates, and Woolley's silt does not run across the whole of Ur. Max Mallowan reviewed the question in Iraq in 1964 and held that a severe inundation lies behind the Mesopotamian flood traditions without sustaining Woolley's identification.

Can you visit Abraham's house at Ur?

There is a consolidated courtyard house at the site that visitors are shown under that name, and the label is modern. What Woolley excavated was a residential quarter of the period from about 1900 to 1700 BC, with lanes, two-storey brick houses, family chapels and burials beneath the floors.

That is genuinely the kind of house a family of Abraham's era in that city lived in. No inscription or object ties any house at Ur to Abraham or Terah, and no excavator has claimed one.

What did Ur worship, and why does that matter for the call?

The city's chief deity was Nanna, called Sin in Akkadian, the moon god, with his consort Ningal. The stepped temple tower that still stands was built for him by Ur-Nammu around 2100 BC, and the last Babylonian king, Nabonidus, restored it and installed his own daughter as its high priestess in 547 BC. Haran, where the family stopped, was the other great centre of the same moon cult, and Nabonidus rebuilt its temple too.

Scripture never names the gods Terah served, so this page holds the two facts side by side rather than combining them into a claim. Nehemiah's Levites praise the God who made the host of heaven, and one verse later they praise Him for bringing Abram out of Ur.

What is the city with foundations that Abraham was looking for?

Hebrews says Abraham lived in tents in the land of promise as a stranger, because he was looking forward to the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God. John Wesley's note on the verse is one sentence: a tent has no foundations.

Hebrews then widens it, saying that these people acknowledged themselves strangers and exiles, that they had opportunity to go back to the country they left and did not take it, and that God has prepared a city for them. The man who walked away from a walled city with a tower spent his life waiting for a better one.

Notable art

1 verified piece depicting Ur

Abraham's company on the road to Canaan, Genesis 12:5
Abraham's company on the road to Canaan, Genesis 12:5Gustave Doré, La Sainte Bible (Tours: Alfred Mame et fils, 1866). Public domain.

Sources cited

Every source behind MannaFest →

Keep studying

Keep this page