Acts 15:38
in Acts 15But Paul thought it best not to take him, because he had deserted them in Pamphylia and had not accompanied them in the work.
BSB
The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾
ASV
But Paul thought not good to take with them him who withdrew from them from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work.
KJV
But Paul thought not good to take him with them, who departed from them from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work.
⋯
This verse in Acts 15
Commentary
12 notes on this verseBut Paul insisted that he should not be received. Because, standing on the very forefront of the line, he had stood too tepidly, and rightly, Paul rejected him, lest others be corrupted by his influence as though it were contagion.
This site's exposition
John, whose surname was Mark
on Acts 15:37-39
Barnabas determined to take with them John, whose surname was Mark, his own kinsman by Colossians 4:10, but Paul thought not good to take him, who departed from them from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work, the desertion at 13:13 still weighing against him in Paul's judgment. The contention was so sharp between them that they departed asunder one from the other, Luke naming the break without assigning blame to either man, and the bench likewise declines to rule which apostle judged rightly, since Paul later calls for Mark as profitable to him for the ministry at 2 Timothy 4:11. So Barnabas took Mark, and sailed unto Cyprus, the work multiplying into two teams rather than ending in either man's disgrace.
The record, by era
The Church Fathers4 voices
John, called Mark, was accompanying them on the evangelic journey, from Palestine as far as Pamphylia. Then, finding the apostles' route too strenuous, and his spirit unbending toward those engaged in struggles, Mark, being a man given to exhaustion and not suited to so laborious …
And there seems indeed to be exasperation, but in fact the whole matter is a plan of the Divine Providence, that each should receive his proper place: and it behooved that they should not be upon a par, but the one should lead, and the other be led. "And so Barnabas took Mark, and sailed unto Cyprus; and Paul chose Silas, and departed, being recommended by the brethren unto the grace of God. And he went through Syria and Cilicia, confirming the Churches." And this also is a work of Providence. For the Cyprians had exhibited nothing of the like sort as they at Antioch and the rest: and those needed the softer character, but these needed such a character as Paul's.
And besides, the contention cannot be said to be evil, when each disputes for such objects (as here) and with just reason. I grant you, if the exasperation were in seeking his own, and contending for his own honor, this might well be (reproved): but if wishing, both the one and the other, to instruct and teach, the one took this way and the other that, what is there to find fault with? For in many things they acted upon their human judgment; for they were not stocks or stones. And observe how Paul impeaches (Mark), and gives the reason. For of his exceeding humility he reverenced Barnabas, as having been partner with him in so great works, and being with him: but still he did not so reverence him, as to overlook (what was necessary).
"And some days after Paul said unto Barnabas, Let us go again and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the Lord, and see how they do. And Barnabas determined to take with them John, whose surname was Mark. But Paul thought not good to take him with them, who departed from them from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work. And the contention was so sharp between them, that they departed asunder one from the other." And already indeed Luke has described to us the character of the Apostles, that the one was more tender and indulgent, but this one more strict and austere. For the gifts are diverse-(the gifts, I say), for that this is a gift is manifest-but the one befitting one, the other another set of characters, and if they change places, harm results instead of good. In the Prophets too we find this: diverse minds, diverse characters: for instance, Elias austere, Moses meek. So here Paul is more vehement.
The Medieval Church1 voice
A certain misunderstanding arose between Paul and Barnabas: one stood on the ground of justice, while the other wished to set justice aside, but each had one goal—the service of faith. The cause of the misunderstanding was as follows. On the evangelical journey, a certain …
5 more voices on this verse
The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices
But Paul thought not good to take him with them,....
If ever there was a heaven upon earth, surely it was in the church at Antioch at this time, when there were so many excellent ministers there, and blessed Paul among them, building up that church in her most holy faith.
The Nineteenth Century3 voices
A commentator
Albert Barnes1798–1870
Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869)
But Paul thought not good - Did not think it proper. Because he could not confide in his perseverance with them in the toils and perils of their journey. Who departed from them ... - Act 13:13. Why he did this is not known. It was evidently, however, for some cause which Paul did not consider satisfactory, and which, in his view, disqualified him from being their attendant again. To the work - Of preaching the gospel.
A commentator
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown1802–1910
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
But Paul thought not good to take him with them who departed from them--that is, who had departed; but the word is stronger than this--"who stood aloof" or "turned away" from them. from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work--the work yet before them. The allusion is to what is recorded in Ac 13:13 (see on Ac 13:13).
But Paul thought not good to take him with them - On this subject, see the note on Act 13:13.
The words behind it
19 Greek wordsEvery Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.
| Greek | Sound | Meaning | Word study | In the Bible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Παῦλος | paulos | Paul | G3972 → | 158 times |
| δὲ | de | however | G1161 → | 2765 times |
| ἠξίου | exiou | was considering | G515 → | |
| τὸν | ton | the [one] | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| ἀποστάντα | apostanta | having withdrawn | G868 → | 14 times |
| ἀπ᾽ | ap᾽ | from | G575 → | 640 times |
| αὐτῶν | auton | them | G846 → | 5565 times |
| ἀπὸ | apo | from | G575 → | 640 times |
| Παμφυλίας | pamphulias | Pamphylia | G3828 → | 5 times |
| καὶ | kai | and | G2532 → | 9120 times |
| μὴ | me | not | G3361 → | 1066 times |
| συνελθόντα | sunelthonta | having gone with | G4905 → | 30 times |
| αὐτοῖς | autois | them | G846 → | 5565 times |
| εἰς | eis | to | G1519 → | 1755 times |
| τὸ | to | the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| ἔργον | ergon | work | G2041 → | 168 times |
| μὴ | me | not | G3361 → | 1066 times |
| συμπαραλαμβάνειν | sumparalambanein | to take along | G4838 → | 4 times |
| τοῦτον.¶ | touton | him. | G3778 → | 1381 times |
ΠαῦλοςPaul
paulosG3972 →158 times
δὲhowever
deG1161 →2765 times
ἠξίουwas considering
exiouG515 →
τὸνthe [one]
tonG3588 →19766 times
ἀποστάνταhaving withdrawn
apostantaG868 →14 times
ἀπ᾽from
ap᾽G575 →640 times
αὐτῶνthem
autonG846 →5565 times
ἀπὸfrom
apoG575 →640 times
ΠαμφυλίαςPamphylia
pamphuliasG3828 →5 times
καὶand
kaiG2532 →9120 times
μὴnot
meG3361 →1066 times
συνελθόνταhaving gone with
sunelthontaG4905 →30 times
αὐτοῖςthem
autoisG846 →5565 times
εἰςto
eisG1519 →1755 times
τὸthe
toG3588 →19766 times
ἔργονwork
ergonG2041 →168 times
μὴnot
meG3361 →1066 times
συμπαραλαμβάνεινto take along
sumparalambaneinG4838 →4 times
τοῦτον.¶him.
toutonG3778 →1381 times
A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.
The walk
8 stopsEach card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.
Through
James 1:8He is a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways.
it leads to
- 1 Kings 18:21
Then Elijah approached all the people and said, “How long will you waver between two opinions? If the LORD is God, follow Him. But if Baal is God, follow him.” But the people did…
- Matthew 6:24
No one can serve two masters: Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and…
- James 4:8
Draw near to God, and He will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you double-minded.
- Isaiah 29:13
Therefore the Lord said: “These people draw near to Me with their mouths and honor Me with their lips, but their hearts are far from Me. Their worship of Me is but rules taught…
- 2 Peter 2:14
Their eyes are full of adultery; their desire for sin is never satisfied; they seduce the unstable. They are accursed children with hearts trained in greed.
- 1 Kings 18:21
Through
Psalms 78:9The archers of Ephraim turned back on the day of battle.
it leads to
- 1 Samuel 31:1
Now the Philistines fought against Israel, and the men of Israel fled before them, and many fell slain on Mount Gilboa.
- Deuteronomy 1:41–44
“We have sinned against the LORD,” you replied. “We will go up and fight, as the LORD our God has commanded us.” Then each of you put on his weapons of war, thinking it…
- 1 Samuel 31:1
Through
Proverbs 25:19Like a broken tooth or a foot out of joint is confidence in a faithless man in time of trouble.
it leads to
- Isaiah 36:6
Look now, you are trusting in Egypt, that splintered reed of a staff that will pierce the hand of anyone who leans on it. Such is Pharaoh king of Egypt to all who trust…
- Isaiah 36:6
Where this verse is studied
On this page
Studies3
On this verse
On this chapter
About Acts

This page draws on 10 works. Open the list of works
This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Acts of the Apostles; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Bede, Commentary on Acts; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homily on Acts 34; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Oecumenius, Commentary on Acts and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Acts.
