Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.

1 Samuelchapter 25

44 verses · BSB1 Samuel book hub →

Key verse

Now there was a man in Maon whose business was in Carmel. He was a very wealthy man with a thousand goats and three thousand sheep, which he was shearing in Carmel.

It stands in scene A of the chapter, verses 1 to 13.

The chapter

Chapter summary

Samuel dies and all Israel mourns, and the story turns at once to a crisis that nearly ruins David. Nabal (churlish and evil in his doings, whose name means folly), refuses provisions to the men who were a wall to his shepherds night and day, and David straps on his sword to kill every male in the house. Abigail, a woman of good understanding, rides out with loaves, wine, sheep, raisins, and figs, and talks him down: the soul of my lord shall be bound in the bundle of life with Jehovah thy God. David blesses her advice as the mercy that kept his hand clean. Nabal's heart dies within him, and ten days later Jehovah smites him.

Context

History · Samuel, Nathan, Gad · 1 Samuel overview

Where the chapter sits

1 Samuel 25 falls in David's rise in Saul's shadow (chapters 16–31). David anointed in secret; Goliath; Jonathan's covenant; Saul's pursuit; the cave of Adullam; Nabal and Abigail; the Philistine sanctuary; Saul's death at Gilboa.

Before it: Saul's reign: promise and rejection, chapters 9–15.

The whole shape of 1 Samuel

The world behind this chapter

1 Samuel 25
When
The death of Samuel and the affair of Nabal · c. 1015 BC, at sheepshearing
Where
Carmel and Maon in the pasture country south of Hebron, at a sheepshearing feast, and the ravine where Abigail meets David's column
Who first heard it
Israelites who knew what protection was worth on an open range

The history

Sheepshearing was the annual payday of a flock owner and it came with a feast, food, wine, and open-handed generosity toward everyone connected with the year's work. Nabal has three thousand sheep and a thousand goats, which puts him among the wealthiest men in the region, and he is shearing at Carmel of Judah, a town in the hill country south of Hebron, not the northern headland of the same name.

The rest of the history, and what it meant to them

David's claim is not a shakedown, though it sits close to one. His men had camped alongside Nabal's shepherds in open country where raiding was constant, and Nabal's own servant testifies that David's men were a wall to us both by night and by day and that nothing was missing. Providing that kind of protection and then asking for a share at the feast was an accepted arrangement on the frontier.

Nabal's refusal is phrased as an insult with a political edge: who is David, who is the son of Jesse? There are many servants these days who break away from their masters. He is calling David a runaway slave in front of witnesses, at a moment when saying so publicly could be reported to Saul.

Abigail's intervention is a masterpiece of negotiation, and the goods she loads say what she thinks the debt is: two hundred loaves, two skins of wine, five dressed sheep, roasted grain, raisin cakes, and fig cakes, a feast for a war band. She takes the blame herself, calls her husband what his name means, and then makes the argument that actually stops David: when the LORD has made you prince over Israel, you will not want this on your conscience, blood shed without cause and your own hand saving you.

Nabal's death ten days after his heart died within him at the news reads like a stroke, and the text simply says the LORD struck him. David's first response is that God has kept him from doing evil with his own hand, the same principle that spared Saul in the cave, tested again on a private enemy.

What it meant to them

Samuel's death is reported in one verse at the top of the chapter, and all Israel gathers to mourn him. The last link to the old order is gone, and the chapter that follows shows David nearly becoming exactly the kind of warlord Israel feared.

First hearers were meant to notice who stopped him. Not a prophet, not a priest, but a woman who rode out to meet four hundred armed men with a load of bread and a better argument.

Sources cited

  • John H. Walton, Victor H. Matthews, and Mark W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament
  • Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Its Life and Institutions

Every work MannaFest builds on →

A. Nabal answers churlishly at sheepshearing

1. (v. 1)

a.Samuel's death is told in a single verse, and all Israel mourns him and buries him at Ramah before the narrative moves at once to Nabal. The last judge and the seer who anointed both kings is now gone, and three chapters later Saul will find no answer from the Lord and go looking for Samuel by other means at Endor. The word of the Lord that had grown rare before Samuel's birth loses its plainest voice in Israel, though David's own path continues under God's hand.

1 Samuel 25:1, 2 voicesWhat preachers and commentators have said about these verses, in their own words.

1 Samuel 25:1

In his house at Ramah - Probably in the court or garden attached to his dwelling-house. (Compare 2Ch 33:20; 2Ki 21:18; Joh 19:41.) The wilderness of Paran - The Septuagint has the far more probable reading “Maon.” The wilderness of Paran lay far off to the south, on the borders of the wilderness of Sinai Num 10:12; 1Ki 11:18, whereas the following verse 1Sa 25:2 shows that the scene is laid in the immediate neighborhood of Maon.

1 Samuel 25:1

The Hebrews took as great care to provide sepulchers anciently as people do in the East still, where every respectable family has its own house of the dead. Often this is in a little detached garden, containing a small stone building (where there is no rock), resembling a house, which is called the sepulcher of the family--it has neither door nor window.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2. (vv. 2-3)

a.Nabal is described as very great in flocks, three thousand sheep and a thousand goats, the kind of wealth shearing season put on display with customary open-handed hospitality toward those who had kept his flocks safe. Verse 3 sets a name against a name, Nabal, the Hebrew word for fool or base one, married to Abigail, whose name means my father's joy, described as of good understanding and a beautiful countenance while her husband is churlish and evil in his doings. The Septuagint and several older readers, Matthew Henry among them, read of the house of Caleb as a pun on the Hebrew word for dog, a snarling and currish man rather than merely a member of Caleb's clan.

1 Samuel 25:2, 2 voices

1 Samuel 25:2

Carmel - Not Mount Carmel on the west of the plain of Esdraelon, but the Carmel close to Maon (marginal references). Shearing his sheep - Which was always a time of open-handed hospitality among flock-masters Gen 38:12-13; 2Sa 13:23-24.

1 Samuel 25:2-3

He was a disgrace to his family, and then it was no honour to him. Degeneranti genus opprobrium--A Good extraction is a reproach to him who degenerates from it. The LXX., and some other ancient versions, read it appellatively, not, He was a Calebite, but He was a dogged man, of a currish disposition, surly and snappish, and always snarling.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 Samuel 25:3, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:3

The name of the man was Nabal - The word נבל nabal signifies to be foolish, base, or villanous; and hence the Latin word nebulo, knave, is supposed to be derived. The name of his wife Abigail - The joy or exultation of my father. A woman of sense and beauty, married to the boor mentioned above, probably because he was rich. Many women have been thus sacrificed.

3. (vv. 4-6)

a.David sends ten young men up to Carmel with a customary greeting for shearing season, wishing peace to Nabal, his house, and all that he has, the ordinary form for approaching a flockmaster at the one time of year hospitality was expected. The greeting is also a quiet reminder, for David's men had protected Nabal's shepherds in the fields, so the peace wished on Nabal's house answers the peace David's men had already kept for it.

1 Samuel 25:6, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:6

Peace be both to thee - This is the ancient form of sending greetings to a friend: Peace to Thee, peace to thy Household, and peace to all that Thou Hast. That is, May both thyself, thy family, and all that pertain unto thee, be in continual prosperity! Perhaps David, by this salutation, wished Nabal to understand that he had acted so towards him and his property that nothing had been destroyed, and that all had been protected; see 1Sa 25:15-17.

4. (vv. 7-8)

a.David's servants state a genuine claim rather than a threat, for his men guarded Nabal's shepherds by night and day and took nothing, and the request for whatever comes to hand at shearing time follows a real custom of the region, where those who protected a flockmaster's herds could expect a share of shearing-time provision. Jamieson Fausset and Brown note that withholding such support broke an established usage of the district, so Nabal's coming refusal is not mere rudeness to strangers but the breaking of a debt his own servants knew was owed.

1 Samuel 25:7, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:7

Thy shepherds which were with us, we hurt them not - It is most evident that David had a claim upon Nabal, for very essential services performed to his herdmen at Carmel. He not only did them no hurt, and took none of their flocks for the supply of his necessities, but he protected them from the rapacity of others; they were a Wall unto us, said Nabal’s servants, both by night and day.

1 Samuel 25:8, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:8

Whatsoever cometh to thine hand - As thou art making a great feast for thy servants, and I and my men, as having essentially served thee, would naturally come in for a share were we present; send a portion by my ten young men, for me and my men, that we also may rejoice with you. Certainly this was a very reasonable and a very modest request. This mode of address is not unfrequent among the Hindoos: “O father, fill the belly of thy son; he is in distress.”

5. (vv. 9-11)

a.Nabal's answer turns contempt into a question, Who is David, and who is the son of Jesse, the same scornful shape David used of Goliath at 17:26, now aimed back at him by a man safe behind his own flocks. Nabal's charge that David is a runaway servant breaking from his master lands ironically, since David did leave Saul's service, not as a deserter but fleeing the javelin Saul had already thrown at him twice within his own house. Matthew Henry reads Nabal's reasoning as the common error of the wealthy, that a man may do what he likes with what is his own, when in truth all possession is stewardship under God.

1 Samuel 25:10, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:10-12

Their protection creates a claim for some kind of tribute, in the shape of supplies of food and necessaries, which is usually given with great good will and gratitude; but when withheld, is enforced as a right. Nabal's refusal, therefore, was a violation of the established usages of the place.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

1 Samuel 25:11, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:11

The mention of water indicates a country where water was scarce (compare Jos 15:19). Or “bread and water” may be equivalent to “meat and drink.”

6. (vv. 12-13)

a.The servants report the insult without avenging it themselves, and David's answer is immediate, every man girds on his sword, and four hundred men go up with him while two hundred stay by the baggage. This is the first time in these two books David moves to shed blood on his own account rather than in battle for Israel, and the chapter sits between the two cave scenes of chapters 24 and 26, where David restrains himself from Saul's blood on either side of it. Here the restraint has to come from someone else.

B. Abigail rides down with loaves and better counsel

1. (vv. 14-17)

a.An unnamed servant goes around Nabal to warn Abigail, because evil is determined against the whole household and Nabal is such a son of Belial that a man cannot speak to him. Belial, worthless one, is the word the narrator used for the sons of Eli at 2:12, and Scripture uses it again for Sheba's rebellion at 2 Sam 20:1 and in David's own last words for the thorns burned rather than handled at 2 Sam 23:6. The servant's account, a wall unto us both by night and day, repeats what David's own men had already claimed, confirming to Abigail that the danger to her house is real and that David's men have kept faith with it.

1 Samuel 25:16, 2 voices

1 Samuel 25:16

A wall - To protect them from the attacks of the Bedouins, etc. They had been as safe with David’s men around them as if they had been dwelling in a walled town.

1 Samuel 25:16

David demands not what he wanted as a debt, either by way of tribute as he was a king, or by way of contribution as he was a general, but asks it as a boon to a friend, that was his humble servant. David's servants delivered their message faithfully and very handsomely, not doubting but to go back well laden with provisions.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2. (vv. 18-19)

a.took two hundred loaves: Abigail moves at once, loading donkeys with two hundred loaves, two skins of wine, dressed sheep, parched corn, raisins and fig cakes, a store large enough to answer four hundred hungry men without asking Nabal's leave. She sends the gift ahead and tells her husband nothing, acting on her own judgment in a household where the master cannot be reasoned with. Matthew Henry reads the size of the gift as wisdom answering folly, for a gift pacifies anger, and Abigail loses nothing of her house by giving generously what Nabal had refused meanly.

1 Samuel 25:18, 2 voices

1 Samuel 25:18

Took two hundred loaves - The Eastern bread is ordinarily both thin and small; and answers to our cakes. Two bottles of wine - That is, two goat-skins full. The hide is pulled off the animal without ripping up; the places where the legs, etc., were are sewed up, and then the skin appears one large bag. This is properly the Scripture and Eastern bottle. There is one such before me. Five sheep - Not one sheep to one hundred men. Clusters of raisins - Raisins dried in the sun. Cakes of figs - Figs cured, and then pressed together.

1 Samuel 25:18

Nabal grudged them water, but she took two bottles ( casks or rundlets ) of wine, loaded her asses with these provisions, and sent them before; for a gift pacifieth anger, Prov. xxi. Jacob thus pacified Esau. When the instruments of the churl are evil, the liberal devises liberal things, and loses nothing by it; for by liberal things shall he stand, Isa. xxxii.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

3. (vv. 20-22)

a.Abigail comes down one path as David comes down another, and the two meet by what providence alone timed. David's own words in verse 21 show the size of what he intends, an oath sworn in the coarse idiom of the day, cursing himself if he leaves alive by morning any male of Nabal's household, a formula used elsewhere in Samuel when a man binds himself to an act. The chapter records David's grievance honestly, that he had kept Nabal's flocks safe for nothing and been repaid evil for good, but the oath itself goes further than the grievance justifies.

1 Samuel 25:20, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:20

She came down - and David - came down - David was coming down Mount Paran; Abigail was coming down from Carmel. - Calmet.

1 Samuel 25:22, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:22

So and more also do God - Nothing can justify this part of David’s conduct. Whatever his provocation might have been, he had suffered, properly speaking, no wrongs; and his resolution to cut off a whole innocent family, because Nabal had acted ungenerously towards him, was abominable and cruel, not to say diabolic. He who attempts to vindicate this conduct of David is, at least constructively, a foe to God and truth.

4. (vv. 23-25)

a.Abigail dismounts and falls on her face before David, then at his feet, taking the blame for Nabal's insult onto herself before she has said a word in her husband's defense, Upon me, my lord, upon me let this iniquity be. Her plea plays on her husband's own name, Nabal is his name, and folly is with him, since the Hebrew word nabal means fool or base one, so the request is not to excuse Nabal but to ask David not to measure his own worth by a fool's provocation. Matthew Henry reads her taking the blame as the wisdom of yielding, which pacifies great offenses, and notes she was not ashamed to take the posture of a penitent for the good of her house in front of both households' men.

1 Samuel 25:23, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:23-24

But before this David had already held back his armed hand in his indignation. How much greater it is not to revile again, than not to avenge oneself! The warriors, too, [who] prepared to take vengeance against Nabal, Abigail restrained by her prayers. From this we perceive that we ought not only to yield to timely entreaties but also to be pleased with them. So much was David pleased that he blessed her who intervened, because he was restrained from his desire for revenge.

Ambrose of Milan· written before 397· On the Duties of the Clergy 1.21.94patristic

5. (v. 26)

a.Abigail's oath answers David's oath, and her theology is exact, it is the Lord who has withheld him from coming to bloodshed and from avenging himself with his own hand, not her gift that stopped him, though her gift is the means. The verse sits at the center of the chapter's argument, for the same restraint from personal vengeance that marks David toward Saul in the cave chapters on either side of this one marks him here toward Nabal, though this time a woman rather than his own conscience supplies it. Albert Barnes reads the Hebrew as crediting the Lord directly with the restraint, Abigail speaking as one who already sees David's cause as the Lord's own.

1 Samuel 25:26, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:26

The passage should be rendered as follows: “And now my lord, as the Lord liveth, and as thy soul liveth,” it is “the Lord” that “hath withholden thee from coming” into blood-guiltiness (as in 1Sa 25:33), “and from saving thyself with thine own hand;” and “now” all “thine enemies” shall be as Nabal (whom she considers as utterly impotent to hurt David, and as already thoroughly humbled before him), and (so shall be) all “that seek evil to my Lord.”

6. (v. 27)

a.Abigail calls her gift a blessing rather than a debt paid or a bribe, and asks that it go to the young men who follow David rather than to David alone, honoring the four hundred who were prepared to act on his oath. What David's grievance called a debt owed and Nabal's refusal called nothing at all, Abigail reframes as a gift freely given, which is the only kind of peace offering that can turn back an oath already sworn.

7. (v. 28)

a.Abigail speaks the covenant's own vocabulary a decade before David hears it from Nathan, for the exact phrase a sure house occurs in Scripture only here, at 1 Sam 2:35 of the priest who will replace Eli, and at 1 Kings 11:38, offered to Jeroboam and there forfeited. She grounds the promise on two things she says are already true of David, that he fights the Lord's battles and that evil has not been found in him, and asks forgiveness for a trespass that is her husband's rather than her own. Albert Barnes compares her confidence to Rahab's conviction that the Lord had given Canaan to Israel, both women testifying to a word from God they had not personally received but plainly believed.

1 Samuel 25:28, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:28

For the Lord will make ... a sure house - Compare 1Sa 2:35, and 2Sa 7:16; 1Ki 11:38. Abigail’s firm persuasion of David’s kingdom stands upon the same footing as Rahab’s conviction of God’s gift of Canaan to the Israelites Jos 2:9-13. Both testified to God’s revelation and their own faith. This is doubtless the reason why Abigail’s speech is recorded.

8. (v. 29)

a.Abigail's image comes from an ordinary practice, precious or important things tied into a bag for safekeeping, and she asks that David's soul be kept that way with the Lord his God while his enemies are slung out as from the middle of a sling. The figure is aimed precisely at the man she is speaking to, the shepherd whose feat with a sling against Goliath was already the most famous thing about him. The phrase later became a fixture of Jewish memorial prayer, but here it is Abigail's own words, spoken over a king not yet crowned.

1 Samuel 25:29, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:29

In the bundle - Rather, “the bag,” in which anything precious, or important to be preserved, was put, and the bag was then tied up (compare Gen 42:35). The souls ... shall he sling out - The comparison is especially appropriate as addressed to David, whose feat with his sling was so celebrated 1Sa 17:49.

9. (vv. 30-31)

a.Abigail speaks of David's kingdom as already settled fact, when the Lord shall have appointed thee ruler over Israel, though he was anointed at 16:13 and enthroned nowhere yet. John Gill reads her confidence as common knowledge in Israel by this point, Samuel's anointing and the Lord's favor toward David already the talk of the people even while Saul still holds the throne. Her closing plea looks past the crisis of the day to the memory a king will carry, no needless bloodshed to grieve over, and a request simply to be remembered once the Lord has dealt well with her lord.

1 Samuel 25:30, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:30

And it shall come to pass, when the Lord shall have done to my lord according to all the good that he hath spoken concerning thee,.... Performed his promise, especially with respect to his kingdom, as follows: and shall have appointed thee ruler over Israel; that is, actually raised him to be, and settled him as king upon the throne of Israel; for he was both appointed and anointed already; and this Abigail knew, and was now well known in Israel, and the common talk of the people.

C. His heart died within him; Abigail becomes David's wife

1. (vv. 32-34)

a.David answers with a threefold blessing, on the Lord who sent Abigail, on her advice, and on Abigail herself, naming plainly what he had been about to do, coming to shed blood and to avenge himself with his own hand. He credits her intervention as the Lord's own providence rather than mere good fortune, seeing in a stranger's counsel what he could not see in his own anger. Verse 34 makes the oath's scale explicit one more time, that but for her haste not a male of Nabal's household would have survived the morning, so the chapter does not let the reader forget how close the outcome came.

1 Samuel 25:34, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:34-35

Further, we are taught at considerable length by other texts of Scripture, too, that we neither should nor can fulfill everything that we decide upon whether with tranquil or upset mind. In them we frequently read that holy men or angels or even almighty God himself altered the things that they had promised. For blessed David determined with the promise of an oath and said, "May God do this and add more to the enemies of David if, of all that belongs to Nabal, I leave one male until morning."

John Cassian· written before 435· CONFERENCE 17.25.5-6patristic

2. (v. 35)

a.David receives what Abigail brought and sends her home in peace, the same word of peace his own men had carried to Nabal at the start of the chapter, now returned in fact rather than merely spoken. Matthew Henry reads David's readiness to be persuaded by a woman's reasoning, though his oath and his anger were already up, as itself the mark of a wise and good man, since oaths cannot bind anyone to a sin.

1 Samuel 25:35, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:35

Wise and good men will hear reason, and let that rule them, though it come from those that are every way their inferiors, and though their passions are up and their spirits provoked. Oaths cannot, bind us to that which is sinful.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

3. (vv. 36-38)

a.Abigail returns to find Nabal holding a feast fit for a king, merry and very drunk, and she tells him nothing of what she had done until morning, waiting until he is capable of hearing it. When the wine is gone out of him and she tells him, his heart died within him, and he became as a stone, and Albert Barnes reads the description as a stroke brought on by the shock, from which he lay senseless ten days before the Lord struck him and he died. John Wesley notes that an oath sworn to commit sin is annulled by not performing it rather than kept by performing it, so it is Abigail's gift that answers David's oath, not the Lord's later stroke on Nabal, which comes after the danger has already passed.

1 Samuel 25:36, 2 voices

1 Samuel 25:36-37

But to a mind that is drunk with fury every right thing that is said appears wrong. Whence to Nabal when he was drunk Abigail laudably kept silence about his fault, but, when he had digested his wine, as laudably told him of it. For he could for this reason perceive the evil he had done, that he did not hear of it when drunk.

1 Samuel 25:36

Abigail came home, and, it should seem, he had so many people and so much plenty about him that he neither missed her nor the provisions she took to David; but she found him in the midst of his jollity, little thinking how near he was to ruin by one whom he had foolishly made his enemy. Sinners are often most secure when they are most in danger and destruction is at the door.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 Samuel 25:37, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:37

He became as a stone - Probably his violent anger at hearing it brought on a fit of apoplexy to which he was disposed by the drunken revel of the night before. After lying senseless for ten days he died.

4. (v. 39)

a.David's second blessing of the chapter answers his first, crediting the Lord rather than his own restraint with settling the matter, the Lord hath returned the wickedness of Nabal upon his own head. The same principle will govern how David later reads Saul's death and Abner's, that vengeance belongs to the Lord and a king's hands must stay clean of it even when the provocation is real. The verse closes with David sending to take Abigail to wife, a request the text records without comment on the haste, though Adam Clarke notes David likely already knew Saul had given Michal to another man by this point.

1 Samuel 25:39, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:39

To take her to him to wife - It is likely that he had heard before this that Saul, to cut off all his pretensions to the throne, had married Michal to Phalti; and this justified David in taking Abigail or any other woman; and, according to the then custom, it was not unlawful for David to take several wives. By his marriage with Abigail, it is probable he became possessed of all Nabal’s property in Carmel and Maon.

5. (vv. 40-42)

a.Abigail's answer to David's proposal is the same posture she took before him in the field, bowing to the earth and calling herself a servant fit only to wash the feet of David's men. She rises at once, rides to him with five of her own maidens, and becomes his wife, a wealthy widow's whole household folded overnight into an outlaw's camp in the wilderness. Albert Barnes notes the text gives no interval for mourning beyond what custom required, so nothing in the narrative suggests unbecoming haste on either side.

1 Samuel 25:40, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:40

There is no note of the exact interval that elapsed between Nabal’s death and David’s hearing of it, or, again, between David’s hearing of it and his message to Abigail; nor is there any reason to suppose that the marriage took place with unbecoming haste. The widow of such a husband as Nabal had been could not, however, be expected to revere his memory. After the usual mourning of seven days, she would probably feel herself free to act as custom allowed. (See 2Sa 11:26.)

6. (vv. 43-44)

a.David takes a second wife, Ahinoam of Jezreel, alongside Abigail, and the text sets his growing household beside Saul's own move against him, for Michal, David's actual wife, has been given by her father to Phalti the son of Laish. Two claims on David's marriage now stand unresolved in the narrative at once, and Scripture keeps both on record until David demands Michal back by name at 2 Sam 3:14, treating Saul's gift of her to Phalti as no divorce at all. John Gill notes that plural marriage, though never commanded and against the law's own pattern, was a custom good men of that age gave into without Scripture commending it.

1 Samuel 25:43, 1 voice

1 Samuel 25:43

In the list of David’s wives Ahinoam is mentioned first 2Sa 3:2; 1Ch 3:1. But this may be only because her son was the first-born. David’s now taking two wives was an indication of his growing power and importance as a chieftain. The number was increased to six when he reigned in Hebron 1Ch 3:1, and still further when he became king of all Israel 2Sa 5:12-13. See 1Sa 1:2 note. Of Jezreel - Not the well-known city of Samaria, which gave its name to the plain of Esdraelon, but a town of Judah, near Carmel (marginal reference).

1 Samuel 25:44, 3 voices

1 Samuel 25:44

But Saul had given Michal his daughter, David's wife, to Phalti the son of Laish,.... Or "for Saul", &c. (i); which is a reason for his marrying again, but no reason for marrying more wives than one.

1 Samuel 25:44

Phalti - Called also Phaltiel, 2Sa 3:16. Of Gallim - Probably a city or town in the tribe of Benjamin; see Isa 10:30. It is likely therefore that Saul chose this man because he was of his own tribe. In this chapter we have the account of the death of Samuel, who from his infancy had been devoted to God and the service of his people. He was born at a time in which religion was at a very low ebb in Israel, as there were but very few prophets, and no open vision - scarcely any revelation from God.

1 Samuel 25:44

Michal--By the unchallengeable will of her father, she who was David's wife was given to another. But she returned and sustained the character of his wife when he ascended the throne.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The text of this chapter

This page carries no textual note on 1 Samuel 25. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →

This page draws on 11 works. Open for the list.

This page draws on Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes; Ambrose of Milan, On the Duties of the Clergy 1.21.94; Gregory the Dialogist, The Book of Pastoral Rule, Part 3, Chapter 16; Jamieson Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871); John Cassian, CONFERENCE 17.25.5-6; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel and Matthew Henry.

Keep studying

On this page

Studies2

On this book