1 Samuelchapter 25
44 verses · Samuel, Nathan and Gad, by tradition · 10th century BC · History
And there was a man in Maon, whose possessions were in Carmel; and the man was very great, and he had three thousand sheep, and a thousand goats: and he was shearing his sheep in Carmel.
Introduction
Samuel, Nathan and Gad, by tradition, History, 1 Samuel Overview.
This chapter was kept for a people who lived by their flocks and knew what protection was worth on open grazing land. It opens with a death that closes an age, and then turns to a quarrel over food at a shearing feast. Listen for the names and what they mean. Listen for how a rich man speaks about a fugitive in front of witnesses. Listen above all to the long speech of a woman who rides out to meet an armed band. The chapter tests whether David will keep with a private enemy the restraint he kept with the king.
Context
- Who
- Israelites who knew what protection was worth on an open range
- What
- An account of Samuel's death, Nabal's insult, Abigail's appeal and David's marriage to her.
- Where
- Ramah where Samuel was buried, then Carmel and Maon in the pasture country south of Hebron.
- When
- At sheep-shearing time; the text gives no year, and on the common reckoning it falls about 1015 BC.
- Why
- To show David kept from shedding blood in anger by a wise woman's appeal, and the LORD settling the wrong Himself.
Historical context
The chapter belongs to three people. David is an outlawed captain with six hundred men in the wilderness. Nabal is a flock owner with three thousand sheep and a thousand goats, which puts him among the wealthiest men of the district. Abigail is his wife, and she acts without telling him.
Show the rest of the historical context, 5 more paragraphs
The time is the last stretch of David's years in the Judean wilderness, shortly before he crosses into Philistine country at chapter 27. The site places it about 1015 BC on the chronology it holds, and the text itself gives no year.
The place is the hill country south of Hebron. Carmel of Judah is a town there, and it is a different place from the northern headland of the same name that Elijah is associated with.
The occasion is shearing, which was the annual payday of a flock owner. It came with a feast and with open-handed provision for everyone connected with the year's work. Roland de Vaux describes the shearing feast as a fixed institution of pastoral life.
A first hearer knew what David's men were asking for. They had camped alongside Nabal's shepherds in open country where raiding was constant. Nabal's own servant testifies at verse 15 that they were a wall by night and by day, and that nothing went missing. Providing that cover and asking for a share at the feast was an accepted arrangement on the frontier.
A first hearer also heard the insult in Nabal's answer at verse 10. Calling David a servant breaking away from his master is calling him a runaway, in front of witnesses, at a time when the charge could be carried to Saul.
Significance
Samuel dies in the first verse and all Israel gathers to mourn him, so the chapter opens with the last link to the old order gone.
Show the rest of the significance, 2 more paragraphs
What follows shows David coming close to becoming the kind of warlord Israel had feared when it asked for a king. Israel was meant to notice who stopped him. No prophet and no priest intervenes, and a woman rides out to meet four hundred armed men with a load of bread and a better argument.
Her argument is the one Israel would recognise as the law of a throne. Blood shed without cause stays with a ruler, and she asks him to keep his hands clear before he has them.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
How it is read
The commentators read this chapter as a case of law and character, and two of their notes are legal rulings. On David girding his sword Rashi draws a rule of court procedure from the order of the verse. From here the Rabbis learned that in capital cases the judges are polled from the least significant first (Rashi on I Samuel 25:13:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J., CC-BY). He cites Maseches Sanhedrin 36a, where the reason is that a junior judge may otherwise be swayed by his seniors (same ref). On Nabal's refusal he reads the insult as a challenge to David's descent, since Nabal asks who David is and points to Ruth the Moabite. He cites Talmud Yerushalmi Sanhedrin 2:3, where the question is David's right to the throne (Rashi on I Samuel 25:10:1, same edition). On the man's name and place he fixes Maon as the city of Yehoshua 15:55 in Judah's territory (Rashi on I Samuel 25:2:1, same edition). On the word describing him he gives the house of Caleb first (Rashi on I Samuel 25:3:1, same edition). He reports Ralbag's reading beside it, that the word points to a dog's nature in a man who would not share his food (same ref). On David's greeting he reads the phrase as a blessing for the coming year. He gives a second reading of it as a word for a living and active man (Rashi on I Samuel 25:6:1, same edition). On the provisions Abigail loaded he explains the term from Targum Yonoson and from Pesachim. He names Rabbi Kalonymos of Rome as the one who taught him the sense (Rashi on I Samuel 25:18:1, same edition). On her descent of the hill he sets a valley between the two parties, so neither saw the other, citing Radak (Rashi on I Samuel 25:20:1, same edition). On her first words he reads her as taking the blame to win a hearing, and telling the plain truth after that (Rashi on I Samuel 25:24:1, same edition). This site carries her at /featured/abigail. Radak stands as a citation at I Samuel 25:1:1, 25:11:1 and 25:23:1. Malbim stands at 25:4:1, 25:5:1 and 25:12:1, and Metzudat David at 25:16:1 and 25:19:1. The corpus holds no English version of them.
What the rabbis say
The corpus records forty rabbinic locators on this chapter, twenty-eight of them Midrash and twelve Talmud, each a locator without text. The death of Samuel draws Jerusalem Talmud Bikkurim 2:1:9 and Kohelet Rabbah 7:1:4. The man of Maon and his flocks draw Bereshit Rabbah 85:6 and Midrash Shmuel 23:9, and his name and nature draw Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 13:5. The sheepshearing draws Bereshit Rabbah 74:5. David's greeting draws Berakhot 55b:10 and Bereshit Rabbah 17:2, which is where the rabbis take up the blessing for the year. The errand of the young men draws Jerusalem Talmud Eruvin 1:10:5. Nabal's answer draws Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 2:3:8 and Midrash Shmuel 23:10, and his refusal of the food draws Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Toldot 10 and Midrash Tehillim 14:4. David arming his men draws Jerusalem Talmud Sanhedrin 4:7:4 and Ein Yaakov, Sanhedrin 4:11. The provisions Abigail took draw Chullin 135a:3 and Chullin 137a:17. Her meeting with David draws Ein Yaakov, Pesakhim 1:6 and Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Khagigah 2:10. David's complaint that he had guarded Nabal for nothing draws Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayetze 58. Abigail's plea draws Midrash Sekhel Tov, Bereshit 43:20:2, Bamidbar Rabbah 10:5 and Esther Rabbah 6:2. Her word about a sure house draws Ein Yaakov, Sotah 1:39 and Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sotah 1:33. The bundle of life draws Aggadat Bereshit 35:1 and Avot DeRabbi Natan 12:5. Her word about bloodguilt draws Bava Kamma 92b:7 and Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Bava Kama 8:8. David's blessing of her draws Otzar Midrashim, Baraita of Rabbi Pinchas Ben Yair 1:36, Megillah 14b:1 and Seder Olam Rabbah 21:2. Nabal's feast and his heart draw Kohelet Rabbah 1:16:1 and Otzar Midrashim, Midrash Minayin 1:15. His death draws Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Rosh Hashanah 1:18 and Jerusalem Talmud Berakhot 2:6:4. Abigail's marriage to David draws Bereshit Rabbah 75:12, and the chapter's close draws Bereshit Rabbah 32:1. The rabbis teach in these places, and this site reports them as their teaching rather than as a rule of the text.
Sources: Rashi, Rashi on I Samuel 25:2:1, 25:3:1, 25:6:1, 25:10:1, 25:13:1, 25:18:1, 25:20:1 and 25:24:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J., CC-BY; Ralbag, Ralbag on the word Calebite, as Rashi's edition carries him at I Samuel 25:3:1; Radak, Radak on I Samuel 25:1:1, 25:11:1 and 25:23:1, cited only, no English version in the corpus; and Radak on the valley between the parties as Rashi carries it; Malbim, Malbim on I Samuel 25:4:1, 25:5:1 and 25:12:1, cited only; Metzudat David, Metzudat David on I Samuel 25:16:1 and 25:19:1, cited only; MannaFest, the Abigail page, src/app/featured/abigail/page.tsx, for the door this chapter takes, 2026.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
Nabal answers churlishly at sheepshearing
buried him in his house at Ramah: Samuel's death is told in a single verse, and all Israel mourns him and buries him at Ramah before the narrative moves at once to Nabal. The last judge and the seer who anointed both kings is now gone, and three chapters later Saul will find no answer from the Lord and go looking for Samuel by other means at Endor. The word of the Lord that had grown rare before Samuel's birth loses its plainest voice in Israel, though David's own path continues under God's hand.
1 Samuel 25:1
“In his house at Ramah - Probably in the court or garden attached to his dwelling-house. (Compare 2Ch 33:20; 2Ki 21:18; Joh 19:41.) The wilderness of Paran - The Septuagint has the far more probable reading “Maon.” The wilderness of Paran lay far off to the south, on the borders of the wilderness of Sinai Num 10:12; 1Ki 11:18, whereas the following verse 1Sa 25:2 shows that the scene is laid in the immediate neighborhood of Maon.”
1 more voice on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
1 Samuel 25:1
“The Hebrews took as great care to provide sepulchers anciently as people do in the East still, where every respectable family has its own house of the dead. Often this is in a little detached garden, containing a small stone building (where there is no rock), resembling a house, which is called the sepulcher of the family--it has neither door nor window.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Samuel 25:2-3
shearing his sheep in Carmel: Nabal is described as very great in flocks, three thousand sheep and a thousand goats, the kind of wealth shearing season put on display with customary open-handed hospitality toward those who had kept his flocks safe. Verse 3 sets a name against a name, Nabal, the Hebrew word for fool or base one, married to Abigail, whose name means my father's joy, described as of good understanding and a beautiful countenance while her husband is churlish and evil in his doings. The Septuagint and several older readers, Matthew Henry among them, read of the house of Caleb as a pun on the Hebrew word for dog, a snarling and currish man rather than merely a member of Caleb's clan.
1 Samuel 25:2
“Carmel - Not Mount Carmel on the west of the plain of Esdraelon, but the Carmel close to Maon (marginal references). Shearing his sheep - Which was always a time of open-handed hospitality among flock-masters Gen 38:12-13; 2Sa 13:23-24.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Samuel 25:2
“He was a disgrace to his family, and then it was no honour to him. Degeneranti genus opprobrium--A Good extraction is a reproach to him who degenerates from it. The LXX., and some other ancient versions, read it appellatively, not, He was a Calebite, but He was a dogged man, of a currish disposition, surly and snappish, and always snarling.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The Calebite line places Nabal in David's own tribe of Judah, as Jamieson, Fausset and Brown observe, so the insult of verse 10 comes from a kinsman. Adam Clarke supposes Abigail was married to him for his wealth. The chapter sets her understanding against his harshness in every scene that follows.
1 Samuel 25:3
“The name of the man was Nabal - The word נבל nabal signifies to be foolish, base, or villanous; and hence the Latin word nebulo, knave, is supposed to be derived. The name of his wife Abigail - The joy or exultation of my father. A woman of sense and beauty, married to the boor mentioned above, probably because he was rich. Many women have been thus sacrificed.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 25:4-6
heard in the wilderness that Nabal: David sends ten young men up to Carmel with a customary greeting for shearing season, wishing peace to Nabal, his house, and all that he has, the ordinary form for approaching a flockmaster at the one time of year hospitality was expected. The greeting is also a quiet reminder, for David's men had protected Nabal's shepherds in the fields, so the peace wished on Nabal's house answers the peace David's men had already kept for it.
1 Samuel 25:4
“And David heard in the wilderness,.... In the wilderness of Paran, where he was, and a wilderness it was to him, being in want of food, as the following relation shows: that Nabal did shear his sheep; when there was generally good living, and so a proper person, and a proper time, for David to apply for the relief of his wants.”
Ten men make an embassy, and John Gill reads the number as a mark of honor paid to Nabal. The order to go up fits the ground. Carmel stood on the higher land above the wilderness where David's band was camped.
1 Samuel 25:5
“And David sent out ten young men,.... Such persons, and such a number of them, he sent to show honour and reverence to Nabal: and David said, unto the young men, get ye up to Carmel; which lay higher than the wilderness, in which he was: and go to Nabal, and greet him in my name; ask him of his peace and welfare, as the Targum; wish all health and happiness in my name, present my service and best respects to him.”
The Hebrew behind Long life to you is obscure, and Albert Barnes renders it as a greeting about Nabal's life and health. Matthew Henry thinks the wish too high a compliment for such a man. Nabal answers it within four verses with contempt.
1 Samuel 25:6
“Peace be both to thee - This is the ancient form of sending greetings to a friend: Peace to Thee, peace to thy Household, and peace to all that Thou Hast. That is, May both thyself, thy family, and all that pertain unto thee, be in continual prosperity! Perhaps David, by this salutation, wished Nabal to understand that he had acted so towards him and his property that nothing had been destroyed, and that all had been protected; see 1Sa 25:15-17.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 25:7-8
we hurt them not: David's servants state a genuine claim rather than a threat, for his men guarded Nabal's shepherds by night and day and took nothing, and the request for whatever comes to hand at shearing time follows a real custom of the region, where those who protected a flockmaster's herds could expect a share of shearing-time provision. Jamieson Fausset and Brown note that withholding such support broke an established usage of the district, so Nabal's coming refusal is not mere rudeness to strangers but the breaking of a debt his own servants knew was owed.
1 Samuel 25:7
“Thy shepherds which were with us, we hurt them not - It is most evident that David had a claim upon Nabal, for very essential services performed to his herdmen at Carmel. He not only did them no hurt, and took none of their flocks for the supply of his necessities, but he protected them from the rapacity of others; they were a Wall unto us, said Nabal’s servants, both by night and day.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
David signs himself your son, and Adam Clarke calls the whole request reasonable and modest. Matthew Henry notes what the restraint had cost. The men who gathered to David at 22:2 were in distress and debt, and keeping them from Nabal's flocks took steady command.
1 Samuel 25:8
Whatsoever cometh to thine hand - As thou art making a great feast for thy servants, and I and my men, as having essentially served thee, would naturally come in for a share were we present; send a portion by my ten young men, for me and my men, that we also may rejoice with you. Certainly this was a very reasonable and a very modest request. This mode of address is not unfrequent among the Hindoos: “O father, fill the belly of thy son; he is in distress.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 25:9-11
spake to Nabal according to all those words: Nabal's answer turns contempt into a question, Who is David, and who is the son of Jesse, the same scornful shape David used of Goliath at 17:26, now aimed back at him by a man safe behind his own flocks. Nabal's charge that David is a runaway servant breaking from his master lands ironically, since David did leave Saul's service, not as a deserter but fleeing the javelin Saul had already thrown at him twice within his own house. Matthew Henry reads Nabal's reasoning as the common error of the wealthy, that a man may do what he likes with what is his own, when in truth all possession is stewardship under God.
Adam Clarke calls the refusal unjust and insulting. Nabal's own servant gives the same verdict at verse 17, calling his master a scoundrel nobody can speak to. The man who scorns David's name is judged by his own household first.
1 Samuel 25:10
“Their protection creates a claim for some kind of tribute, in the shape of supplies of food and necessaries, which is usually given with great good will and gratitude; but when withheld, is enforced as a right. Nabal's refusal, therefore, was a violation of the established usages of the place.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Albert Barnes reads bread and water as a plain phrase for food and drink, with water named because it was scarce in that country. Nabal claims the bread, water and meat as his own. Abigail took loaves, wine and butchered sheep from the same house at verse 18 and brought them to David's men.
1 Samuel 25:11
The mention of water indicates a country where water was scarce (compare Jos 15:19). Or “bread and water” may be equivalent to “meat and drink.”
1 Samuel 25:12-13
turned their way, and went again: The servants report the insult without avenging it themselves, and David's answer is immediate, every man girds on his sword, and four hundred men go up with him while two hundred stay by the baggage. This is the first time in these two books David moves to shed blood on his own account rather than in battle for Israel, and the chapter sits between the two cave scenes of chapters 24 and 26, where David restrains himself from Saul's blood on either side of it. Here the restraint has to come from someone else.
1 Samuel 25:12
“So David's young men turned their way,.... Their backs on him, without making any reply; and though they did not return railing for railing, they treated him with silent contempt; and though they did not offer to do any injury to his person, nor to take anything away by force, yet they were determined to report this usage to David, who they doubted not would avenge the affront put on him and them: and went again; to the wilderness from whence they came: and came and told him all these sayings; rude and reproachful ones, just as they were delivered.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Samuel 25:12
“Christ's servants, when they are thus abused, must leave it to him to plead his own cause and wait till he appear in it. The servant showed his lord what affronts he had received, but did not return them, Luke xiv.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The two hundred left with the supplies set a pattern the book returns to at 30:24, where David rules that those who guard the baggage share the spoil equally. John Gill notes the young men had come back expecting David to avenge the affront. The order to strap on swords answers that expectation at once.
Abigail rides down with loaves and better counsel
1 Samuel 25:14-17
he railed on them: An unnamed servant goes around Nabal to warn Abigail, because evil is determined against the whole household and Nabal is such a son of Belial that a man cannot speak to him. Belial, worthless one, is the word the narrator used for the sons of Eli at 2:12, and Scripture uses it again for Sheba's rebellion at 2 Sam 20:1 and in David's own last words for the thorns burned rather than handled at 2 Sam 23:6. The servant's account, a wall unto us both by night and day, repeats what David's own men had already claimed, confirming to Abigail that the danger to her house is real and that David's men have kept faith with it.
1 Samuel 25:14
“Railed on them - The marginal reading, “flew upon them,” is nearer to the original.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Samuel 25:14
“Had this servant spoken to Nabal, and shown him the danger he had exposed himself to by his own rudeness, he would have said, "Servants are now-a-days so saucy, and so apt to prescribe, that there is no enduring them," and, it may be, would have turned him out of doors.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Matthew Henry reads the servant's words as testimony for David's honor from inside Nabal's own household. The praise answers David's complaint at verse 21. He calls his care of Nabal's flocks wasted, and the herdsmen who received it think otherwise.
1 Samuel 25:15
"The men were very good to us, and, though they were themselves exposed, yet they protected us and were a wall unto us." Those who do that which is good shall, one way or other, have the praise of the same. Nabal's own servant will be a witness for David that he is a man of honour and conscience, whatever Nabal himself says of him.
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Albert Barnes explains the wall as protection from desert raiders, the herdsmen as safe among David's men as inside a walled town. Day and night means a watch kept around the clock. Raiders of that kind appear in the book at 30:1, when Amalekites strike the Negev and burn Ziklag.
1 Samuel 25:16
“A wall - To protect them from the attacks of the Bedouins, etc. They had been as safe with David’s men around them as if they had been dwelling in a walled town.”
1 more voice on this verse
1 Samuel 25:16
“David demands not what he wanted as a debt, either by way of tribute as he was a king, or by way of contribution as he was a general, but asks it as a boon to a friend, that was his humble servant. David's servants delivered their message faithfully and very handsomely, not doubting but to go back well laden with provisions.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The servant brings the decision to Abigail and leaves it with her, a measure of the trust the household placed in her judgment. Matthew Henry reads the next verse as her answer. It was no time to linger when the whole house stood in danger.
1 Samuel 25:17
“Nabal is his name, and folly is with him: but I thine handmaid saw not the young men of my lord, whom thou didst send. 26 Now therefore, my lord, as the L ORD liveth, and as thy soul liveth, seeing the L ORD hath withholden thee from coming to shed blood, and from avenging thyself with thine own hand, now let thine enemies, and they that seek evil to my lord, be as Nabal.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Samuel 25:18-19
took two hundred loaves: Abigail moves at once, loading donkeys with two hundred loaves, two skins of wine, dressed sheep, parched corn, raisins and fig cakes, a store large enough to answer four hundred hungry men without asking Nabal's leave. She sends the gift ahead and tells her husband nothing, acting on her own judgment in a household where the master cannot be reasoned with. Matthew Henry reads the size of the gift as wisdom answering folly, for a gift pacifies anger, and Abigail loses nothing of her house by giving generously what Nabal had refused meanly.
1 Samuel 25:18
“Took two hundred loaves - The Eastern bread is ordinarily both thin and small; and answers to our cakes. Two bottles of wine - That is, two goat-skins full. The hide is pulled off the animal without ripping up; the places where the legs, etc., were are sewed up, and then the skin appears one large bag. This is properly the Scripture and Eastern bottle. There is one such before me. Five sheep - Not one sheep to one hundred men. Clusters of raisins - Raisins dried in the sun. Cakes of figs - Figs cured, and then pressed together.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
1 Samuel 25:18
“Nabal grudged them water, but she took two bottles ( casks or rundlets ) of wine, loaded her asses with these provisions, and sent them before; for a gift pacifieth anger, Prov. xxi. Jacob thus pacified Esau. When the instruments of the churl are evil, the liberal devises liberal things, and loses nothing by it; for by liberal things shall he stand, Isa. xxxii.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Sending the gift ahead of herself follows the order Jacob used with Esau at Genesis 32. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown call this common practice. Abigail followed her young men on a donkey to see how David and his men took the gift.
1 Samuel 25:19
“Abigail not only sent her servants in this way, but resolved to go in person, following her present, as is commonly done, to watch the impression which her munificence would produce.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Samuel 25:20-22
came down by the covert of the hill: Abigail comes down one path as David comes down another, and the two meet by what providence alone timed. David's own words in verse 21 show the size of what he intends, an oath sworn in the coarse idiom of the day, cursing himself if he leaves alive by morning any male of Nabal's household, a formula used elsewhere in Samuel when a man binds himself to an act. The chapter records David's grievance honestly, that he had kept Nabal's flocks safe for nothing and been repaid evil for good, but the oath itself goes further than the grievance justifies.
1 Samuel 25:20
“She came down - and David - came down - David was coming down Mount Paran; Abigail was coming down from Carmel. - Calmet.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Albert Barnes explains in vain as care given in the wilderness in the false hope of a return. Augustine of Hippo grants that Nabal paid David back evil for good, and still faults the anger that led David to swear to kill every male. Saul had confessed the same wrong toward David at 24:17.
1 Samuel 25:21
“I thought to oblige him and make him my friend, but I see it is to no purpose. He has no sense of gratitude, nor is he capable of receiving the impressions of a good turn, else he could not have used me thus. He hath requited me evil for good. " But, when we are thus requited, we should not repent of the good we have done, nor be backward to do good another time.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
2 more voices on this verse
1 Samuel 25:21
“Indeed, because David swore that he would kill Nabal and then in more considerate forbearance did not, shall we say that we should imitate him by swearing rashly that we are going to do what we see later ought not to be done? But, just as fear confounded the one [Lot] so that he was willing to prostitute his daughters, so did anger confound the other [David] so as to swear rashly.”
Augustine of Hippo · written before 430 · Against Lying 9.21-22patristic
1 Samuel 25:21
“In vain - i. e., under false expectation.”
In the Hebrew text David calls down punishment on David's enemies, and Matthew Henry reads this as David turning the curse away from himself. The Berean text follows the Greek, which names David. Adam Clarke allows no defense of a vow to leave no man of Nabal's household alive by morning.
1 Samuel 25:22
“So and more also do God - Nothing can justify this part of David’s conduct. Whatever his provocation might have been, he had suffered, properly speaking, no wrongs; and his resolution to cut off a whole innocent family, because Nabal had acted ungenerously towards him, was abominable and cruel, not to say diabolic. He who attempts to vindicate this conduct of David is, at least constructively, a foe to God and truth.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 25:23-25
lighted off the ass: Abigail dismounts and falls on her face before David, then at his feet, taking the blame for Nabal's insult onto herself before she has said a word in her husband's defense, Upon me, my lord, upon me let this iniquity be. Her plea plays on her husband's own name, Nabal is his name, and folly is with him, since the Hebrew word nabal means fool or base one, so the request is not to excuse Nabal but to ask David not to measure his own worth by a fool's provocation. Matthew Henry reads her taking the blame as the wisdom of yielding, which pacifies great offenses, and notes she was not ashamed to take the posture of a penitent for the good of her house in front of both households' men.
1 Samuel 25:23
“But before this David had already held back his armed hand in his indignation. How much greater it is not to revile again, than not to avenge oneself! The warriors, too, [who] prepared to take vengeance against Nabal, Abigail restrained by her prayers. From this we perceive that we ought not only to yield to timely entreaties but also to be pleased with them. So much was David pleased that he blessed her who intervened, because he was restrained from his desire for revenge.”
Ambrose of Milan · written before 397 · On the Duties of the Clergy 1.21.94patristic
Abigail asks for a hearing before she makes any case, and calls herself David's servant in the same breath. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that dismounting before a superior was the highest mark of respect. David grants the hearing in full at verse 35.
1 Samuel 25:24
“Yielding pacifies great offences. She put herself into the place and posture of a penitent and of a petitioner, and was not ashamed to do it, when it was for the good of her house, in the sight both of her own servants and of David's soldiers.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Abigail calls her husband by the same word his servant used at verse 17, the Hebrew term for a worthless man. Matthew Henry hears a wife who knows the rudeness is old. She had never seen David's messengers.
as the Lord liveth, and as thy soul liveth: Abigail's oath answers David's oath, and her theology is exact, it is the Lord who has withheld him from coming to bloodshed and from avenging himself with his own hand, not her gift that stopped him, though her gift is the means. The verse sits at the center of the chapter's argument, for the same restraint from personal vengeance that marks David toward Saul in the cave chapters on either side of this one marks him here toward Nabal, though this time a woman rather than his own conscience supplies it. Albert Barnes reads the Hebrew as crediting the Lord directly with the restraint, Abigail speaking as one who already sees David's cause as the Lord's own.
1 Samuel 25:26
The passage should be rendered as follows: “And now my lord, as the Lord liveth, and as thy soul liveth,” it is “the Lord” that “hath withholden thee from coming” into blood-guiltiness (as in 1Sa 25:33), “and from saving thyself with thine own hand;” and “now” all “thine enemies” shall be as Nabal (whom she considers as utterly impotent to hurt David, and as already thoroughly humbled before him), and (so shall be) all “that seek evil to my Lord.”
this blessing which thine handmaid hath brought: Abigail calls her gift a blessing rather than a debt paid or a bribe, and asks that it go to the young men who follow David rather than to David alone, honoring the four hundred who were prepared to act on his oath. What David's grievance called a debt owed and Nabal's refusal called nothing at all, Abigail reframes as a gift freely given, which is the only kind of peace offering that can turn back an oath already sworn.
the Lord will certainly make my lord a sure house: Abigail speaks the covenant's own vocabulary a decade before David hears it from Nathan, for the exact phrase a sure house occurs in Scripture only here, at 1 Sam 2:35 of the priest who will replace Eli, and at 1 Kings 11:38, offered to Jeroboam and there forfeited. She grounds the promise on two things she says are already true of David, that he fights the Lord's battles and that evil has not been found in him, and asks forgiveness for a trespass that is her husband's rather than her own. Albert Barnes compares her confidence to Rahab's conviction that the Lord had given Canaan to Israel, both women testifying to a word from God they had not personally received but plainly believed.
1 Samuel 25:28
“For the Lord will make ... a sure house - Compare 1Sa 2:35, and 2Sa 7:16; 1Ki 11:38. Abigail’s firm persuasion of David’s kingdom stands upon the same footing as Rahab’s conviction of God’s gift of Canaan to the Israelites Jos 2:9-13. Both testified to God’s revelation and their own faith. This is doubtless the reason why Abigail’s speech is recorded.”
bound in the bundle of life: Abigail's image comes from an ordinary practice, precious or important things tied into a bag for safekeeping, and she asks that David's soul be kept that way with the Lord his God while his enemies are slung out as from the middle of a sling. The figure is aimed precisely at the man she is speaking to, the shepherd whose feat with a sling against Goliath was already the most famous thing about him. The phrase later became a fixture of Jewish memorial prayer, but here it is Abigail's own words, spoken over a king not yet crowned.
1 Samuel 25:29
“In the bundle - Rather, “the bag,” in which anything precious, or important to be preserved, was put, and the bag was then tied up (compare Gen 42:35). The souls ... shall he sling out - The comparison is especially appropriate as addressed to David, whose feat with his sling was so celebrated 1Sa 17:49.”
1 Samuel 25:30-31
appointed thee ruler over Israel: Abigail speaks of David's kingdom as already settled fact, when the Lord shall have appointed thee ruler over Israel, though he was anointed at 16:13 and enthroned nowhere yet. John Gill reads her confidence as common knowledge in Israel by this point, Samuel's anointing and the Lord's favor toward David already the talk of the people even while Saul still holds the throne. Her closing plea looks past the crisis of the day to the memory a king will carry, no needless bloodshed to grieve over, and a request simply to be remembered once the Lord has dealt well with her lord.
1 Samuel 25:30
“And it shall come to pass, when the Lord shall have done to my lord according to all the good that he hath spoken concerning thee,.... Performed his promise, especially with respect to his kingdom, as follows: and shall have appointed thee ruler over Israel; that is, actually raised him to be, and settled him as king upon the throne of Israel; for he was both appointed and anointed already; and this Abigail knew, and was now well known in Israel, and the common talk of the people.”
Matthew Henry draws the lesson that a temptation should be weighed by how it will look afterward. The pleasure of revenge soon turns bitter. Her request to be remembered once David reigns is answered long before, at verse 39, when he sends for her as his wife.
His heart died within him; Abigail becomes David's wife
1 Samuel 25:32-34
which sent thee this day to meet me: David answers with a threefold blessing, on the Lord who sent Abigail, on her advice, and on Abigail herself, naming plainly what he had been about to do, coming to shed blood and to avenge himself with his own hand. He credits her intervention as the Lord's own providence rather than mere good fortune, seeing in a stranger's counsel what he could not see in his own anger. Verse 34 makes the oath's scale explicit one more time, that but for her haste not a male of Nabal's household would have survived the morning, so the chapter does not let the reader forget how close the outcome came.
1 Samuel 25:32
“And David said to Abigail,.... Having heard her out, and being overcome with her rhetoric and powerful arguments: blessed be the Lord God of Israel, which sent thee this day to meet me; who put it into her heart to come out and meet him, and endeavour to avert him from his bad design, which his heart was set upon; he saw plainly the hand of God in it, and in the first place acknowledges the goodness of divine Providence, in directing her to take the step she did.”
3 more voices on this verse
1 Samuel 25:32
“I MUST tell you the story, for if you do not realize the circumstances, you will not understand these words. David was in the position of an outlaw in his county. He knew that he was one day to be king over Israel, but he had such reverence for Saul, the Lord's' anointed, that he would do nothing that would look like usurpation, or seem in any way to injure the reigning monarch.”
Charles Spurgeon · written before 1892 · The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 2924: “Preventing Grace” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition)Particular Baptist
1 Samuel 25:32
“God is to be acknowledged in all the kindnesses that our friends do us either for soul or body. Whoever meet us with counsel, direction, comfort, caution, or seasonable reproof, we must see God sending them. We ought to be very thankful for those happy providences which are means of preventing sin.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Samuel 25:32
“At all events, it was the means of opening his eyes to the moral character of the course on which he had been impetuously rushing; and in accepting her present, he speaks with lively satisfaction as well as gratitude to Abigail, for having relieved him from bloodshed.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew Henry reads avenging himself as taking a seat that belongs to God, who claims vengeance as His own at Deuteronomy 32:35. Henry sets beside it David's own later prayer. At Psalm 51:14 he asks for deliverance from bloodguilt, the same sin he was kept from on this day.
John Cassian cites David's oath against Nabal as proof that a vow sworn in anger should be set aside. Matthew Henry measures the mercy by how near David came to shedding blood. Only Abigail's quick coming kept every male of Nabal's house alive.
1 Samuel 25:34
Further, we are taught at considerable length by other texts of Scripture, too, that we neither should nor can fulfill everything that we decide upon whether with tranquil or upset mind. In them we frequently read that holy men or angels or even almighty God himself altered the things that they had promised. For blessed David determined with the promise of an oath and said, "May God do this and add more to the enemies of David if, of all that belongs to Nabal, I leave one male until morning."
John Cassian · written before 435 · CONFERENCE 17.25.5-6patristic
Go up in peace to thine house: David receives what Abigail brought and sends her home in peace, the same word of peace his own men had carried to Nabal at the start of the chapter, now returned in fact rather than merely spoken. Matthew Henry reads David's readiness to be persuaded by a woman's reasoning, though his oath and his anger were already up, as itself the mark of a wise and good man, since oaths cannot bind anyone to a sin.
1 Samuel 25:35
“Wise and good men will hear reason, and let that rule them, though it come from those that are every way their inferiors, and though their passions are up and their spirits provoked. Oaths cannot, bind us to that which is sinful.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Samuel 25:36-38
like the feast of a king: Abigail returns to find Nabal holding a feast fit for a king, merry and very drunk, and she tells him nothing of what she had done until morning, waiting until he is capable of hearing it. When the wine is gone out of him and she tells him, his heart died within him, and he became as a stone, and Albert Barnes reads the description as a stroke brought on by the shock, from which he lay senseless ten days before the Lord struck him and he died. John Wesley notes that an oath sworn to commit sin is annulled by not performing it rather than kept by performing it, so it is Abigail's gift that answers David's oath, not the Lord's later stroke on Nabal, which comes after the danger has already passed.
1 Samuel 25:36
“But to a mind that is drunk with fury every right thing that is said appears wrong. Whence to Nabal when he was drunk Abigail laudably kept silence about his fault, but, when he had digested his wine, as laudably told him of it. For he could for this reason perceive the evil he had done, that he did not hear of it when drunk.”
Gregory the Dialogist · written before 604 · The Book of Pastoral Rule, Part 3, Chapter 16patristic
1 more voice on this verse
1 Samuel 25:36
“Abigail came home, and, it should seem, he had so many people and so much plenty about him that he neither missed her nor the provisions she took to David; but she found him in the midst of his jollity, little thinking how near he was to ruin by one whom he had foolishly made his enemy. Sinners are often most secure when they are most in danger and destruction is at the door.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
The heart that was in high spirits at night becomes like a stone by morning, and Matthew Henry sets the two verses side by side. John Wesley reads it as horror at a danger past. He compares a rider who learns at dawn that he crossed a broken bridge in the dark.
1 Samuel 25:37
“He became as a stone - Probably his violent anger at hearing it brought on a fit of apoplexy to which he was disposed by the drunken revel of the night before. After lying senseless for ten days he died.”
The chapter that opens with all Israel mourning Samuel records no mourning for Nabal. Matthew Henry marks the silence. The narrator names the Lord as the one who struck, so the death David had sworn to cause comes without his hand.
1 Samuel 25:38
“And it came to pass, about ten days after,.... After he had lain in this stupid and senseless manner for ten days: that the Lord smote Nabal, that he died; with some disease or increased the grief of his heart, and the fears of his mind that he died therewith.”
Blessed be the Lord, that hath pleaded the cause of my reproach: David's second blessing of the chapter answers his first, crediting the Lord rather than his own restraint with settling the matter, the Lord hath returned the wickedness of Nabal upon his own head. The same principle will govern how David later reads Saul's death and Abner's, that vengeance belongs to the Lord and a king's hands must stay clean of it even when the provocation is real. The verse closes with David sending to take Abigail to wife, a request the text records without comment on the haste, though Adam Clarke notes David likely already knew Saul had given Michal to another man by this point.
1 Samuel 25:39
“To take her to him to wife - It is likely that he had heard before this that Saul, to cut off all his pretensions to the throne, had married Michal to Phalti; and this justified David in taking Abigail or any other woman; and, according to the then custom, it was not unlawful for David to take several wives. By his marriage with Abigail, it is probable he became possessed of all Nabal’s property in Carmel and Maon.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Samuel 25:40-42
to take thee to him to wife: Abigail's answer to David's proposal is the same posture she took before him in the field, bowing to the earth and calling herself a servant fit only to wash the feet of David's men. She rises at once, rides to him with five of her own maidens, and becomes his wife, a wealthy widow's whole household folded overnight into an outlaw's camp in the wilderness. Albert Barnes notes the text gives no interval for mourning beyond what custom required, so nothing in the narrative suggests unbecoming haste on either side.
1 Samuel 25:40
“There is no note of the exact interval that elapsed between Nabal’s death and David’s hearing of it, or, again, between David’s hearing of it and his message to Abigail; nor is there any reason to suppose that the marriage took place with unbecoming haste. The widow of such a husband as Nabal had been could not, however, be expected to revere his memory. After the usual mourning of seven days, she would probably feel herself free to act as custom allowed. (See 2Sa 11:26.)”
Ambrose of Milan, in a letter, sets David's two wives side by side, Ahinoam the sterner and Abigail the one full of mercy. Her answer to David's servants fits his reading. Both wives go with David into Gath at 27:3 and are taken captive at Ziklag at 30:5.
Matthew Henry reads the marriage as an act of faith. David had no house of his own to bring her to, and Abigail joined him on the strength of the promise she had spoken at verse 28. The same word for hurry marks her at verse 18.
1 Samuel 25:43-44
David also took Ahinoam of Jezreel: David takes a second wife, Ahinoam of Jezreel, alongside Abigail, and the text sets his growing household beside Saul's own move against him, for Michal, David's actual wife, has been given by her father to Phalti the son of Laish. Two claims on David's marriage now stand unresolved in the narrative at once, and Scripture keeps both on record until David demands Michal back by name at 2 Sam 3:14, treating Saul's gift of her to Phalti as no divorce at all. John Gill notes that plural marriage, though never commanded and against the law's own pattern, was a custom good men of that age gave into without Scripture commending it.
1 Samuel 25:43
“In the list of David’s wives Ahinoam is mentioned first 2Sa 3:2; 1Ch 3:1. But this may be only because her son was the first-born. David’s now taking two wives was an indication of his growing power and importance as a chieftain. The number was increased to six when he reigned in Hebron 1Ch 3:1, and still further when he became king of all Israel 2Sa 5:12-13. See 1Sa 1:2 note. Of Jezreel - Not the well-known city of Samaria, which gave its name to the plain of Esdraelon, but a town of Judah, near Carmel (marginal reference).”
Albert Barnes reads the gift of Michal to another man as Saul's formal break with David, cutting the marriage tie that made David the king's son-in-law. Adam Clarke places Gallim in Benjamin and thinks Saul chose a man of his own tribe. Isaiah 10:30 names it beside Laishah and Anathoth.
1 Samuel 25:44
“But Saul had given Michal his daughter, David's wife, to Phalti the son of Laish,.... Or "for Saul", &c. (i); which is a reason for his marrying again, but no reason for marrying more wives than one.”
2 more voices on this verse
1 Samuel 25:44
“Michal--By the unchallengeable will of her father, she who was David's wife was given to another. But she returned and sustained the character of his wife when he ascended the throne.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Samuel 25:44
“Phalti - Called also Phaltiel, 2Sa 3:16. Of Gallim - Probably a city or town in the tribe of Benjamin; see Isa 10:30. It is likely therefore that Saul chose this man because he was of his own tribe. In this chapter we have the account of the death of Samuel, who from his infancy had been devoted to God and the service of his people. He was born at a time in which religion was at a very low ebb in Israel, as there were but very few prophets, and no open vision - scarcely any revelation from God.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
How this psalm is built
The form: Narrative, a wilderness episode of protection, refused payment and averted bloodguilt, set between the two chapters in which David spares Saul, as Keil and Delitzsch classes it.
The patterns in this chapter
| Device | What it does | Where to see it |
|---|---|---|
| A man named Fool, and the name argued in open court | Adam Clarke gives the root of the name at verse 3 as the Hebrew nabal, to be foolish, base or villainous, and the name of his wife as the joy or exultation of my father. Abigail then turns the name into her whole argument at verse 25, that her husband lives up to what he is called and is beneath David's notice. The narrator sets the two names side by side before either character has spoken.Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on 1 Samuel 25:3. | 1 Samuel 25:3, 1 Samuel 25:25 |
| Peace wished, peace refused, peace given | David's ten young men carry a greeting of peace to Nabal's house at verse 6, and Nabal answers it with a question about who David is. At verse 35 David sends Abigail home with the same word, after she has brought the provision her husband withheld. The chapter closes on the greeting it opened with, paid by the wife rather than by the master.the store's published exposition notes on verses 4 to 6 and verse 35, MannaFest, exposition_notes for 1 Samuel 25. | 1 Samuel 25:6, 1 Samuel 25:10, 1 Samuel 25:35 |
| Oath against oath | David binds himself at verse 22 to leave no male of Nabal's house alive by morning. Abigail answers with the same formula at verse 26 and turns it the other way, crediting the LORD with holding him back from bloodshed. David repeats her wording again at verse 34 when he concedes. One formula carries the threat, the answer and the surrender.Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on 1 Samuel 25:26. | 1 Samuel 25:22, 1 Samuel 25:26, 1 Samuel 25:34 |
| Abigail's plea, the longest speech a woman makes in either book of Samuel | Verses 24 to 31 run without interruption from the blame taken on herself to the request to be remembered when David is king. She moves through the name of her husband, the gift, the sure house, the bundle of the living and the clean conscience of a future ruler. Albert Barnes holds that the speech is on record because she testified to a revelation about David that she had not received herself.Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on 1 Samuel 25:28. | 1 Samuel 25:24, 1 Samuel 25:31 |
| The load on the donkeys, itemised | Verse 18 lists what Abigail sent ahead: loaves, skins of wine, butchered sheep, roasted grain, clusters of raisins and cakes of figs, each with its number. The list is the measure of what Nabal had refused, since it feeds four hundred armed men on the road. The store's exposition note on verses 18 to 19 reads the size of the gift as wisdom answering folly.Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on 1 Samuel 25:18. | 1 Samuel 25:18, 1 Samuel 25:11 |
The historical value
11 more paragraphs on the patterns
The chapter turns on a custom rather than on an event. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, cited in the store's exposition note on verses 7 to 8, hold that men who guarded a flockmaster's herds could expect a share of the shearing-time provision. Withholding it broke an established usage of the district. That reading makes Nabal's answer at verse 11 the breaking of a debt his own servants knew was owed, which is how the servant of verse 15 describes it. The two place names the chapter uses, Maon and Carmel, are the southern Judean sites rather than the northern Carmel of Elijah. Verse 2 locates the household in the hill country south of Hebron.
Verse 44 carries a legal fact that the later narrative depends on. Saul gives Michal, who is David's wife, to Palti son of Laish. The store's exposition note on verses 43 to 44 records that Scripture keeps both claims open until David demands Michal back by name at 2 Samuel 3:14, treating the transfer as no divorce at all.
The debated concept
Whether Nabal's Calebite descent is also a pun is disputed among the older readers. The store's exposition note on verses 2 to 3 records the second reading. The Septuagint and several older readers, Matthew Henry among them, took the phrase of the house of Caleb as a play on the Hebrew word for dog. On that reading the line calls him a snarling man as well as placing his clan. Adam Clarke keeps the plain clan reading and puts the whole weight of the name on nabal itself.
What killed Nabal is read two ways. Albert Barnes, cited in the store's note on verses 36 to 38, reads the heart that died within him as a stroke brought on by the shock, after which he lay senseless ten days. The text itself says at verse 38 that the LORD struck him, and it gives no medical account. Both readings can stand together, and the chapter states the agent without describing the means.
Whether David's oath at verse 22 bound him is the third question. John Wesley, cited in the store's note on verses 36 to 38, holds that an oath sworn to commit a sin is annulled by leaving it unperformed. Matthew Henry, in the store's note on verse 35, reads David's readiness to be persuaded as the mark of a wise man, on the ground that an oath cannot bind anyone to a sin. Neither writer treats the oath as a debt David still owed.
The divine connection
Abigail's phrase at verse 28 is the chapter's most striking line. Albert Barnes points the reader to 1 Samuel 2:35, 2 Samuel 7:16 and 1 Kings 11:38. He holds that her persuasion of David's kingdom stands on the same footing as Rahab's conviction that God had given Canaan to Israel at Joshua 2:9 to 13. Both women testified to a revelation they had not personally received. The promise of a lasting house reaches David from Nathan at 2 Samuel 7, years after Abigail says it on a road in the wilderness. What the chapter claims is that the promise was already common report, and Barnes says that is why the speech is written down.
Verse 29 is the second line. Albert Barnes reads the bundle as a bag in which anything precious was tied up for keeping, and compares Genesis 42:35. He adds that the sling image is aimed at the man in front of her, whose feat with a sling at 1 Samuel 17:49 was the most famous thing about him. Adam Clarke reads the same verse as a promise that David's life would be supported by the Fountain of life. The evidence here is the wording and the commentators who read it, and the chapter makes no claim beyond that.
How the rest of Scripture reads this chapter
The New Testament does not cite 1 Samuel 25. Within the Old Testament the chapter is picked up twice. The servant uses the word Belial of Nabal at verse 17. It is the narrator's word for the sons of Eli at 1 Samuel 2:12, the word for Sheba's rebellion at 2 Samuel 20:1, and David's own word at 2 Samuel 23:6. The principle David states at verse 39, that the LORD returned Nabal's wickedness on his own head, governs how he reads Saul's death at 2 Samuel 1 and Abner's at 2 Samuel 3.
Keep studying
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The form and classifications
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on 1 Samuel 25:3; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments, 1832 to 1869, on 1 Samuel 25:28; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel, cited in the store's exposition note on verses 12 to 13 and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on 1 Samuel 25:23 to 25.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Ambrose of Milan, Letter 34; Augustine of Hippo, Against Lying 9.21-22; Jamieson Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Cassian, CONFERENCE 17.25.5-6; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Samuel and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
