Ruthchapter 1
22 verses · BSBRuth book hub →
Naomi and Her Daughters-in-Law, Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain
Key verse
In the days when the judges ruled, there was a famine in the land. And a certain man from Bethlehem in Judah, with his wife and two sons, went to reside in the land of Moab.
It stands in scene A of the chapter, verses 1 to 5.
The chapter
Chapter summary
In the days when the judges judged there is a famine in Bethlehem, the house of bread, and Elimelech takes Naomi and their two sons to the fields of Moab. Ten years later the husband and both sons are dead. Hearing that Jehovah has visited his people in giving them bread, Naomi turns homeward and urges her daughters-in-law back to their mothers' houses; Orpah kisses her and goes, but Ruth cleaves with the vow that has outlived every other line in the book: 'whither thou goest, I will go… thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God' (1:16). Naomi arrives asking to be called Mara, for the Almighty has dealt very bitterly with her, at the beginning of barley harvest.
Context
History · Samuel · Ruth overview
Where the chapter sits
Ruth 1 falls in Emptying (chapters 1). Naomi leaves Bethlehem full, returns empty; Ruth clings: ‘thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God.’
Whither thou goest. ‘Entreat me not to leave thee’; the covenant commitment Ruth makes to Naomi and to Naomi's God.
After it: Gleaning, chapters 2.
The whole shape of Ruth→The world behind this chapter
Ruth 1The history
Bethlehem means house of bread, and the book opens with no bread in it. Judah's hill country farms on rainfall alone, on terraced slopes with thin soil; two dry winters in a row and a family is finished. Moab, just across the Dead Sea rift, sits on a high plateau that catches different weather and was known for grain and flocks. Going there was a short, sensible, desperate move.
The rest of the history, and what it meant to them
It was also a loaded one. Moab had hired Balaam against Israel and had drawn Israelite men into the worship of Baal of Peor, and the Law barred Moabites from the assembly to the tenth generation. Moab's god was Chemosh; a stone slab set up by a later Moabite king, the Mesha Stele, still survives and credits Chemosh with Moab's victories in his own words. Marrying into Moab was not a neutral act.
A widow in that world had no independent standing. Property ran through men, so a woman without a husband depended on a son, a father, or a brother-in-law. Three widows in one household with no surviving sons is not a sad situation; it is a household that has ceased to exist economically. Naomi's advice that her daughters-in-law go back to their mothers' houses is the only kindness she has left to give.
Ruth's answer is a covenant oath, not a sentiment. Your people shall be my people and your God my God, sworn with a self-curse, is the language of binding oneself for life. The two women arrive at the beginning of barley harvest, which in that region falls around April, the exact moment when a poor person can begin to eat.
What it meant to them
Naomi comes home and asks to be called Mara, which means bitter, and says the LORD has brought her back empty. The first hearers were not given a cheerful book. They were given a woman who says plainly that God has dealt harshly with her, and the story does not correct her yet.
But a Moabite woman has just sworn covenant loyalty to the God of Israel in language no Israelite in the book of Judges ever managed. Hearers who had just come through that book would have felt the contrast.
Sources cited
- John H. Walton, Victor H. Matthews, and Mark W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament
- Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Its Life and Institutions
A. Famine, Moab, and three graves
1. (vv. 1-2)
a.In the days when the judges ruled: The book fixes its own date inside the period Judges describes, so what follows runs alongside chapters where every man did that which was right in his own eyes. A famine drives a man out of Bethlehem, which means house of bread, and he goes to Moab, which Deuteronomy 23:3 bars from the congregation to the tenth generation. The names carry the story: Elimelech means my God is king, in a book set when there was no king in Israel, and Naomi means pleasant, which verse 20 undoes.
Ruth 1:1, 2 voicesWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
Ruth 1:1
“Now it came to pass, in the days when the judges ruled,.... So that it appears that this history is of time and things after the affair of Micah, and of the concubine of the Levite, and of the war between Israel and Benjamin; for in those times there was no king nor judge in Israel; but to what time of the judges, and which government of theirs it belongs to, is not agreed on.”
Ruth 1:1
“In the days when the Judges ruled - “Judged.” This note of time, like that in Rth 4:7; Jdg 18:1; Jdg 17:6, indicates that this Book was written after the rule of the judges had ceased. The genealogy Rth 4:17-22 points to the time of David as the earliest when the Book of Ruth could have been written. A famine - Caused probably by one of the hostile invasions recorded in the Book of Judges.”
Ruth 1:2, 2 voices
Ruth 1:2
“Elimelech--signifies "My God is king." Naomi--"fair or pleasant"; and their two sons, Mahlon and Chilion, are supposed to be the same as Joash and Saraph (1Ch 4:22).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Ruth 1:2
“Ephrathites - Bethlehem was otherwise called Ephratha. Naomi signifies my amiable or pleasant one: Mahlon and Chilon signify sickness and consumption.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
2. (vv. 3-5)
a.Three men die in three verses and the text gives no cause for any of them. The sons marry Moabite women, which the law discouraged and did not forbid outright in the way Deuteronomy 7:3 forbids the seven nations. Verse 5 leaves the sentence standing on the woman rather than the men, the woman was left of her two sons and her husband, which is the position the rest of the book answers.
Ruth 1:4, 1 voice
Ruth 1:4
“All agree that this was ill done. The Chaldee says, They transgressed the decree of the word of the Lord in taking strange wives. If they would not stay unmarried till their return to the land of Israel, they were not so far off but that they might have fetched themselves wives thence.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Ruth 1:5, 1 voice
Ruth 1:5
“And Mahlon and Chilion died also both of them,.... As well as their father, in the land of Moab, after they had lived with their wives in it about ten years; the Targum is,"because they transgressed the decree of the Word of the Lord, and joined in affinity with strange people, their days were cut off;''or shortened: and the woman was left of her two sons and her husband; deprived both of her husband and her sons, which was a great affliction, aggravated by her being in a strange country; many are the afflictions of the righteous.”
B. Whither thou goest, I will go
1. (vv. 6-7)
a.What turns her homeward is a report that the LORD had visited his people in giving them bread, so the house of bread has bread again. This is the only act of God the chapter reports directly, and it is done offstage in a country she is not in. Everything else in the book happens through ordinary people keeping faith.
Ruth 1:6, 1 voice
Ruth 1:6
“She had heard - By the mouth of an angel, says the Targum. The Lord had visited his people - “Because of the righteousness of Ibzan the judge, and because of the supplications of pious Boaz.” - Targum. It is imagined, and not without probability, that Mahlon and Chilion are the same with Joash and Saraph, mentioned 1Ch 4:22, where the Hebrew should be thus translated, and Joash and Saraph, who married in Moab, and dwelt in Lehem. See the Hebrew.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
2. (vv. 8-9)
a.She sends them back and prays for them in the same breath, and the word behind kindly is chesed, the covenant loyalty word, used here by an Israelite of two Moabite women. What she asks for them is rest, each of you in the house of her husband, which is exactly what Boaz gives Ruth in chapter 3 and what Naomi herself gives up by asking. The kiss and the weeping are the first of two rounds; the second parts them.
Ruth 1:8, 1 voice
Ruth 1:8
“Accompanying their mother-in-law to the borders of their own land would probably be an act of Oriental courtesy. Naomi with no less courtesy presses them to return. The mention of the mother’s house, which the separation of the women’s house or tent from that of the men facilitates, is natural in her mouth, and has more tenderness in it than father’s house would have had; it does not imply the death of their fathers Rth 2:11.”
Ruth 1:9, 1 voice
Ruth 1:9
“The Lord grant you that ye may find rest--enjoy a life of tranquillity, undisturbed by the cares, incumbrances, and vexatious troubles to which a state of widowhood is peculiarly exposed. Then she kissed them--the Oriental manner when friends are parting.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
3. (vv. 10-13)
a.Naomi argues from the levirate law of Deuteronomy 25:5, that a brother raises up seed to the dead, and shows the law cannot reach them because there are no more sons and will be none. The argument is legally exact and it is meant to release them rather than to persuade them. She ends by putting the whole of it on God, the hand of the LORD is gone out against me, which is the reading of her own life she carries until chapter 4.
Ruth 1:10, 1 voice
Ruth 1:10
“And they said unto her,.... When they had eased themselves in cries and tears, and had recovered their speech: surely we will return with thee unto thy people; to be proselyted, as the Targum; not only to dwell with them, but to worship with them.”
Ruth 1:11, 1 voice
Ruth 1:11
“See marginal references and notes. The Levirate law probably existed among the Moabites, and in Israel extended beyond the brother in the strict sense, and applied to the nearest relations, since Boaz was only the kinsman of Elimelech Rth 3:12.”
4. (vv. 14-15)
a.Orpah kissed and Ruth clave, and the verb behind clave is the one Genesis 2:24 uses of a man cleaving to his wife. Orpah does nothing wrong: she does what Naomi told her twice to do, and the text never blames her. Naomi's last argument names what is actually at stake, thy sister in law is gone back unto her people, and unto her gods, so the choice being put to Ruth is a choice of God before it is a choice of country.
Ruth 1:14, 1 voice
Ruth 1:14
“And Orpah kissed her mother-in-law - The Septuagint add, Και επεστρεψεν εις τον λαον αυτης, And returned to her own people. The Vulgate, Syrian, and Arabic, are to the same purpose.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Ruth 1:15, 1 voice
Ruth 1:15
“Gone back - unto her gods - They were probably both idolaters, their having been proselytes is an unfounded conjecture. Chemosh was the grand idol of the Moabites. The conversion of Ruth probably commenced at this time.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
5. (vv. 16-17)
a.Six clauses in rising order, from where she walks to where she is buried, and the middle pair is the hinge, thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God. She closes with the covenant oath formula, the LORD do so to me, and more also, and swears it by the name of the God she is adopting rather than by Chemosh. The words are read at weddings and they are spoken here by a widow to her mother in law, on a road, with nothing to gain.
Ruth 1:16, 2 voices
Ruth 1:16
“Ruth, who surpassed the definition of the Law, and entered into the Church, and became an Israelite, and deserved to be counted among the greater ones of the Lord's family, because of the choice of her mind and not her body, is a great example for us, because in her the figure of our entrance into the Church of the Lord, who are gathered from the nations, preceded.”
Ambrose of Milan· written before 397· Commentary on Lukepatristic
Ruth 1:16
“THIS was a very brave, outspoken confession of faith. Please notice that it was made by a woman, a young woman, a poor woman, a widow woman and a foreigner. Remembering all that, I should think there is no condition of gentleness, or of obscurity, or of poverty, or of sorrow which should prevent anybodyfrom making an open confession of allegiance to God when faith in the Lord Jesus Christ has been exercised.”
Charles Spurgeon· written before 1892· The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 2680: “Ruth Deciding for God” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition)Particular Baptist
Ruth 1:17, 1 voice
Ruth 1:17
“The Lord do so to me, and more - May he inflict any of those punishments on me, and any worse punishment, if I part from thee till death. And it appears that she was true to her engagement; for Naomi was nourished in the house of Boaz in her old age, and became the fosterer and nurse of their son Obed, Rth 4:15, Rth 4:16.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
6. (v. 18)
a.The argument stops because it has been answered, and the verse records the silence rather than an agreement. Naomi says nothing to Ruth for the rest of the chapter, and at verse 21 she describes herself as coming home empty while the woman who refused to leave her is standing there. The book lets that stand without comment for three chapters.
C. Call me not Naomi, call me Mara
1. (vv. 19-21)
a.The town asks is this Naomi, which tells a reader how much ten years and three graves had changed her. She answers by renaming herself Mara, bitter, against Naomi, pleasant, and gives her reason twice using the name Almighty, which is Shaddai, the name God used of himself to Abraham at Genesis 17:1. I went out full, and the LORD hath brought me home again empty is her own summary and the book will overturn it at 4:14-17 in the mouths of the same women.
Ruth 1:19, 1 voice
Ruth 1:19
“All the city was moved about them - It appears that Naomi was not only well known, but highly respected also at Bethlehem; a proof that Elimelech was of high consideration in that place.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Ruth 1:20, 2 voices
Ruth 1:20
“Call me not Naomi - That is, beautiful or pleasant. Call me Mara - That is, bitter; one whose life is grievous to her. The Almighty - שדי Shaddai, He who is self-sufficient, has taken away the props and supports of my life.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Ruth 1:20
“It is the Lord, 1 Sam. iii. Especially to consider that he who afflicts us is Shaddai, the Almighty, with whom it is folly to contend and to whom it is our duty and interest to submit. It is that name of God by which he enters into covenant with his people: I am God Almighty, God All-sufficient, Gen. xvii.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Ruth 1:21, 1 voice
Ruth 1:21
“The Lord hath testified against me - The phrase is very commonly applied to a man who gives witness concerning (usually against) another in a court of justice Exo 20:16; 2Sa 1:16; Isa 3:9. Naomi in the bitterness of her spirit complains that the Lord Himself turned against her, and was bringing her sins up for judgment.”
2. (v. 22)
a.She is called the Moabitess here and four more times in the book, so the thing that makes her an outsider is repeated rather than quietly dropped. The closing clause sets the season, the beginning of barley harvest, which is the law of gleaning at Leviticus 19:9 becoming possible and the whole of chapter 2 waiting on it. Matthew 1:5 puts this woman in the genealogy of Christ in the same verse as Rahab.
Ruth 1:22, 1 voice
Ruth 1:22
“In the beginning of barley harvest - This was in the beginning of spring, for the barley harvest began immediately after the passover, and that feast was held on the 15th of the month Nisan, which corresponds nearly with our March. The Targum says, “They came to Beth-lehem on that day in which the children of Israel began to mow the sheaf of barley which was to be waved before the Lord.” This circumstance is the more distinctly marked, because of Ruth’s gleaning, mentioned in the succeeding chapter.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The text of this chapter
This page carries no textual note on Ruth 1. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →
This page draws on 9 works. Open for the list.
This page draws on Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Ambrose of Milan, Commentary on Luke; Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 2680: “Ruth Deciding for God” (lightly modernized text, CCEL edition); Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871); John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765); Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth and Matthew Henry.
Keep studying
On this page
Trails1
Subjects1

