Judgeschapter 19
30 verses · BSBJudges book hub →
A Levite Finds a Woman's Corpse, Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain
Key verse
But she was unfaithful to him and left him to return to her father’s house in Bethlehem in Judah. After she had been there four months,
It stands in scene A of the chapter, verses 1 to 15.
The chapter
Chapter summary
A Levite sojourning in Ephraim goes to Bethlehem-judah to bring back his concubine, is delayed by her father's hospitality, and sets out too late in the day. He refuses to lodge in Jebus because it is a city of foreigners and presses on to Gibeah of Benjamin, where no one takes them in until an old man of Ephraim does. Then base fellows beset the house with a demand deliberately echoing Sodom, and the night ends with the woman abused until the dawn and found at the door with her hands upon the threshold. The Levite cuts her into twelve pieces and sends them throughout all the borders of Israel, with the charge: consider it, take counsel, and speak.
Context
History · Samuel · Judges overview
Where the chapter sits
Judges 19 falls in Appendix: diagnosis of Israel (chapters 17–21). Micah's household idolatry and the Danite migration; the Levite's concubine and the near-extinction of Benjamin. Not chronological; thematic. ‘Every man did that which was right in his own eyes.’
Before it: The twelve judges, chapters 3–16.
The whole shape of Judges→The world behind this chapter
Judges 19The history
Hospitality was not politeness in that world; it was survival infrastructure. There were no inns on most roads, so a traveler reaching a town at dusk sat down in the open square and waited for a household to take him in, food, water for the feet, fodder for the animals, and above all protection for the night. A town where nobody offers is a town that has broken the basic contract of the region.
The rest of the history, and what it meant to them
The travelers deliberately pass Jebus, which is Jerusalem while it is still a Canaanite city, because the servant is told they should not turn aside into a city of foreigners. They push on to Gibeah precisely because it is Israelite. That decision is the hinge of the whole account.
The old man who finally takes them in is himself from the hill country of Ephraim, a resident alien in Gibeah, the only one who behaves like an Israelite is the one who is not from there. What follows deliberately echoes Sodom almost line for line: the surrounding of the house, the demand, the offer of women instead. The first hearers were meant to catch the echo and be sickened by where it is happening.
Cutting the body into twelve pieces and sending them through the territory is a summons, brutal but recognized. Saul later does the same thing with a yoke of oxen. A dismembered body arriving in your village meant a national assembly with a blood claim attached, and refusing to answer it carried a curse.
What it meant to them
This is the low point of the book, and it is told at length with no comment at all. The narrator's only judgment is the refrain about no king in Israel. Everything else is left to the hearer.
The Levite is no hero either, he pushes his concubine out the door, sleeps, and in the morning tells her to get up so they can go. When he reports to the assembly he edits his own part out of the story. First hearers who caught that would have understood that the rot was not confined to Gibeah.
Sources cited
- Roland de Vaux, Ancient Israel: Its Life and Institutions
- Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth
A. A Levite goes to fetch his concubine home
1. (vv. 1-2)
a.when there was no king in Israel: The formula falls four times in the book, at 17:6, 18:1, 19:1 and 21:25, and it brackets the closing block at both ends. A Levite and Bethlehem open this chapter as they opened chapter 17, where a Levite of Bethlehem went to sojourn in mount Ephraim; here a Levite of mount Ephraim takes a concubine out of Bethlehem, and the two halves of that pairing are reversed. Verse 2 says she played the whore against him, while the Septuagint reads that she was angry with him and the Vulgate has only that she left him, and Josephus in Antiquities 5.2.8 writes that she became estranged. The reason she went is carried three ways by the old witnesses and the Hebrew says the one thing.
Judges 19:1, 1 voiceWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
Judges 19:1
“It was no disreputable connection this Levite had formed; for a nuptial engagement with a concubine wife (though, as wanting in some outward ceremonies, it was reckoned a secondary or inferior relationship) possessed the true essence of marriage; it was not only lawful, but sanctioned by the example of many good men.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Judges 19:2, 2 voices
Judges 19:2
“Played the whore - Neither the Vulgate, Septuagint, Targum, nor Josephus, understand this word as implying any act of conjugal infidelity on the woman’s part. They merely state that the parties disagreed, and the woman returned to her father’s house. Indeed all the circumstances of the case vindicate this view of the subject. If she had been a whore, or adulteress, it is not very likely that her husband would have gone after her to speak friendly, literally, to speak to her heart, and entreat her to return.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Judges 19:2
“Other versions concur with JOSEPHUS, in representing the reason for the flight from her husband's house to be, that she was disgusted with him, through frequent brawls. And her husband arose, and went after her, to speak friendly unto her--Hebrew, "speak to her heart," in a kindly and affectionate manner, so as to rekindle her affection.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
2. (vv. 3-4)
a.The Hebrew behind speak friendly is to speak to her heart, the same expression that stands behind Ruth 2:13, where Boaz has spoken friendly unto thine handmaid. It is the one act of kindness the chapter records, and the father answers it by rejoicing to meet him. Three days was the ordinary length of a guest's welcome, and verse 4 closes on the third, so everything after it is the father pressing for more than custom asked.
3. (vv. 5-7)
a.Five verses go on eating and drinking and on a father pressing his guest to stay, which slows the telling down to the hour. The words recur across the chapter: comfort thine heart at verses 5 and 8, let thine heart be merry at verses 6 and 9, and making their hearts merry at verse 22, where the same phrase stands over the moment the house is beset. Hospitality is what the whole delay is made of, and hospitality is what Gibeah withholds at verse 15.
4. (vv. 8-9)
a.The fifth day is named and then spent, since they tarried until afternoon. The father's plea at verse 9 counts the hour twice over, the day draweth toward evening and the day groweth to an end, and the second clause in Hebrew is the picture of a day pitching camp for the night. The Levite leaves anyway, and verse 14 reports what the hour cost him, that the sun went down upon them when they were by Gibeah.
Judges 19:8, 1 voice
Judges 19:8
“And they tarried until afternoon - Merely that they might avoid the heat of the day, which would have been very inconvenient in travelling.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Judges 19:9, 1 voice
Judges 19:9
“This is a perfect picture of the manners of the time. It is probable that the father showed more than usual hospitality, in order to ensure the kind treatment of his daughter by her husband. These particulars are given to account for their journey running so far into the evening, which was the immediate cause of the horrible catastrophe which followed.”
5. (vv. 10-12)
a.Jerusalem is a Jebusite town here, which Joshua 15:63 records of Judah and Judges 1:21 records of Benjamin, and it stays Jebusite until David takes it at 2 Samuel 5:6 to 9. The servant proposes lodging there and the master refuses on one ground, that it is not of the children of Israel, and turns to a town of his own people instead. What follows happens in Benjamin, among Israelites, in the place chosen for being Israelite.
Judges 19:10, 1 voice
Judges 19:10
“Jebus being still, though not entirely (Jud 1:8) in the possession of the old inhabitants, the Levite resisted the advice of his attendant to enter it and determined rather to press forward to pass the night in Gibeah, which he knew was occupied by Israelites. The distance from Beth-lehem to Jerusalem is about six miles.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Judges 19:11, 1 voice
Judges 19:11
“When they were by Jebus - This was Jerusalem, in which, though after the death of Joshua it appears to have been partly conquered by the tribe of Judah, yet the Jebusites kept the strong hold of Zion till the days of David, by whom they were finally expelled. See the note on Jdg 1:8.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Judges 19:12, 1 voice
Judges 19:12
“City of a stranger - This shows how completely, even in these early days, the Jebusite population had excluded both the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.”
6. (vv. 13-15)
a.Gibeah and Ramah are both Benjamite towns, and Gibeah is where Saul lives when the kingdom begins, called Gibeah of Saul at 1 Samuel 11:4, 15:34 and 2 Samuel 21:6. Verse 15 states the failure without comment: he sat him down in a street of the city, for there was no man that took them into his house to lodging. Taking in the traveller is the duty Genesis 18 and 19 turn on, and Hosea 9:9 and 10:9 later measure Israel by the days of Gibeah.
Judges 19:14, 1 voice
Judges 19:14
“And they passed on, and went their way,.... Proceeded on in their journey from Jebus or Jerusalem, near to which they were: and the sun went down upon them when they were by Gibeah, which belongeth to Benjamin; which is added, to distinguish it from another Gibeah in the tribe of Judah, Jos 15:57 when they were come pretty near to this place, on the side of it, as it seems, the sun was just setting, which determined them to take up their lodging here, as follows.”
Judges 19:15, 2 voices
Judges 19:15
“A street - Probably the square or place within the gates, where courts were held, bargains made, and where the chief men and strangers congregated.”
Judges 19:15
“Hence we conclude that the custom, which is still frequently witnessed in the cities of the East, was then not uncommon, for travellers who were late in arriving and who had no introduction to a private family, to spread their bedding in the streets, or wrapping themselves up in their cloaks, pass the night in the open air.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
B. One old man takes the travelers in at Gibeah
1. (vv. 16-17)
a.The one man who stops for them is from mount Ephraim himself and only sojourning in Gibeah, and the verse adds that the men of the place were Benjamites. Lot stood in the same position at Sodom, a sojourner sitting in the gate at Genesis 19:1, and the men of that city threw it at him at 19:9, this one fellow came in to sojourn. The old man's first words are the two questions a host asks a stranger, whither goest thou, and whence comest thou.
Judges 19:16, 1 voice
Judges 19:16
“Which was also of Mount Ephraim - i. e., of the country of the Levite. This single giver of hospitality was himself a stranger and sojourner at Gibeah.”
Judges 19:17, 1 voice
Judges 19:17
“If Gibeah was like Sodom, this old man was like Lot in Sodom, who sat in the gate to invite strangers, Gen. xix. Thus Job opened his doors to the traveller, and would not suffer him to lodge in the street, Job xxxi. How ready he was to give credit to the Levite's account of himself when he saw no reason at all to question the truth of it.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
2. (vv. 18-19)
a.He names his destination as the house of the Lord, where the Septuagint reads to my house, which is where verse 29 has him arrive; both readings are old and the chapter settles neither. The house of God stood at Shiloh through this period, which Judges 18:31 states outright and 21:19 assumes, and the road from Bethlehem up to mount Ephraim runs by it. Verse 19 lists what the party already carries so that no host could plead the cost: straw and provender for the asses, bread and wine for the people, and no want of any thing.
Judges 19:18, 1 voice
Judges 19:18
“The house of the Lord - Probably at Shiloh (marginal references). The Levite was probably one of those who ministered at the tabernacle. His two donkeys and servant show him to have been in good circumstances, and he had a home of his own.”
Judges 19:19, 1 voice
Judges 19:19
“There is both straw and provender for our asses - In the countries principally devoted to pasturage, there was no hay; but as they raised some corn, they took great care of their straw, chopped it very small, and having mixed it with barley, beans, or the pounded kernels of dates, made it into balls, and fed their cattle with it. Straw, cut into what is called chaff, is not unfrequently used in England for the same purpose.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
3. (vv. 20-21)
Judges 19:20-22
a.Washing the feet at verse 21 is the courtesy of Genesis 18:4 and 19:2, and the exact phrase they washed their feet falls three times in Scripture, here, at Genesis 43:24 in Joseph's house, and at John 13:12. Verse 22 then repeats Genesis 19:4 and 19:5 close to word for word, the house beset round about, the door beaten, and the demand bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may know him. The word Belial enters Scripture at Deuteronomy 13:13 of men drawing a whole city into idolatry, falls here, returns at Judges 20:13 of these same men, and is used once in the New Testament at 2 Corinthians 6:15.
C. The night at Gibeah, and twelve pieces sent through Israel
1. (v. 22)
Judges 19:22, 1 voice
Judges 19:22
“Sons of Belial - Profligate fellows. See the notes on Deu 13:13. That we may know him - See Gen 19:5. These were genuine sodomites as to their practice; sons of Belial, rascals and miscreants of the deepest dye; worse than brutes, being a compound of beast and devil inseparably blended.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
2. (vv. 23-24)
a.The old man's answer runs along Lot's at Genesis 19:6 to 8, out at the door, my brethren, do not so wickedly, and then his own daughter offered in the guest's place. The narrator reports the offer and records no approval of it and no rebuke of it. What both hosts defend is the man under their roof, and what both put forward against him is a woman of their own household.
Judges 19:23, 1 voice
Judges 19:23
“This man is come into mine house - He appeals to the sacred rights of hospitality, just as Lot did Gen 19:8. Both cases betray painfully the low place in the social scale occupied by woman in the old world, from which it is one of the glories of Christianity to have raised her.”
Judges 19:24, 1 voice
Judges 19:24
“Here is my daughter, a maiden - Such a proposal was made by Lot to the men of Sodom, Gen 19:8, but nothing can excuse either. That the rights of hospitality were sacred in the East, and most highly regarded we know; and that a man would defend, at the expense of his life, the stranger whom he had admitted under his roof, is true; but how a father could make such a proposal relative to his virgin daughter, must remain among those things which are incomprehensible.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
3. (vv. 25-26)
a.At Sodom the visitors pulled Lot inside and struck the men at the door with blindness at Genesis 19:10 and 19:11, and the guests were never touched. Here nothing intervenes, and the night is given in a single clause, they knew her, and abused her all the night until the morning. Verse 26 brings her back at first light to the door of the house where her lord was, and she gets that far and no further.
Judges 19:25, 1 voice
Judges 19:25
“So the man took his concubine - The word יחזק yachazek, which we here translate simply took, signifies rather to take or seize by violence. The woman would not go out to them; but her graceless husband forced her to go, in order that he might save his own body. He could have but little love for her, and this was the cause of their separation before.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Judges 19:26, 2 voices
Judges 19:26
“Overcome by this cruelty or by grief at her wrong, she fell at the door of their host where her husband had entered, and died, with the last effort of her life guarding the feelings of a good wife so as to preserve for her husband at least her mortal remains.”
Ambrose of Milan· written before 397· On the Duties of the Clergy 3.19.114patristic
Judges 19:26
“Fell down at the door - She had strength to reach the door, but not to knock for admittance: when she reached the door she fell down dead! The reason of this abominable and horrid catastrophe is strongly signified by the original words, Jdg 19:25: וידעו אותה ויתעללו בה כל הלילה vaiyedu othah, vaiyithallelu bah col hallailah, which we modestly translate, and they knew her, and they abused her all the night. More literally, but still not fully: Illi cum ea rem habuerunt, et alternatim in eam tota nocte ascenderunt.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
4. (vv. 27-28)
a.The detail the narrator stops on is her hands upon the threshold, which measures how far she got. Up, and let us be going is the only word the Levite is recorded as speaking to her in the whole chapter, and none answered is all the Hebrew says. The Septuagint adds at this point that she was dead, where the Hebrew leaves the moment of her death unstated, so when she died is read two ways by the old witnesses and the chapter itself does not say.
Judges 19:28, 1 voice
Judges 19:28
“There was no king in Israel, nor (for aught that appears) any sanhedrim, or great council, to appeal to, and demand justice from. Phinehas is high priest, but he attends closely to the business of the sanctuary, and will be no judge or divider.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
5. (vv. 29-30)
a.The twelve pieces sent into all the coasts of Israel work as a summons to the tribes, and Saul does the same thing with a yoke of oxen at 1 Samuel 11:7, hewing them in pieces and sending them throughout all the coasts of Israel; he sends from Gibeah, this town. Verse 30 is the measure the nation takes for itself, that there was no such deed done nor seen from the day that the children of Israel came up out of the land of Egypt unto this day. The chapter ends by handing the matter over in three imperatives, consider of it, take advice, and speak your minds, and chapter 20 is what the tribes do with it.
Judges 19:29, 2 voices
Judges 19:29
“A knife - Rather, “the” “knife”. The single household implement used, not like our knives at our meals, but for slaughtering and cutting up the animals into joints for eating Gen 22:6, Gen 22:10; Pro 30:14. Together with her bones ... - Rather, “into her bones”, or “bone by bone, into twelve pieces”. The “pieces” are synonymous with the “bones” (compare Eze 24:4-5). There is something truly terrible in the stern ferocity of grief and indignation which dictated this desperate effort to arouse his countrymen to avenge his wrong. Compare 1Sa 11:7.”
Judges 19:29
“He divided it into twelve pieces, according to the bones, so some read it, that is, by the joints, sending one to each tribe, even to Benjamin among the rest, with the hope that some among them would be moved to join in punishing so great a villany, and the more warmly because committed by some of their own tribe.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Judges 19:30, 1 voice
Judges 19:30
“There was no such deed done nor seen - They were all struck with the enormity of the crime; and considered it a sovereign disgrace to all the tribes of Israel. Consider of it - Literally, Put it to yourselves; take counsel upon it; and speak. This was the prelude to the council held, and the subsequent operations, which are mentioned in the following chapter. I Have passed over the abominable transactions of this chapter as lightly as I could, and shall make no apology to the learned or unlearned reader for leaving some things untranslated.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
The text of this chapter
This page carries no textual note on Judges 19. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →
This page draws on Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes; Ambrose of Milan, On the Duties of the Clergy 3.19.114; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871); John Gill; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: Joshua, Judges, Ruth and Matthew Henry.
Keep studying
On this page
Studies1

