Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Romans 11:7

in Romans 11

What then? What Israel was seeking, it failed to obtain, but the elect did. The others were hardened,

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

What then? That which Israel seeketh for, that he obtained not; but the election obtained it, and the rest were hardened:

KJV

What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded

This verse in Romans 11

Commentary

16 notes on this verse

A commentator

Cyril of Alexandria

EXPLANATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS · Written before 444.

Israel tried to find righteousness in the type which was the law but did not obtain it. However, those who were sealed were elected and did obtain it on account of their belief, being justified by their faith. The rest were blinded, being hardened and rebellious.

This site's exposition

What Israel was seeking, it failed to obtain

on Romans 11:7-10

What Israel sought it failed to obtain, while the elect did, and the others were hardened. Verses 8 to 10 quote Deuteronomy 29:4, Isaiah 29:10 and Psalm 69:22-23, a spirit of stupor, eyes that cannot see, a table turned into a snare. The hardening is real, and verse 25 will call it partial.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers4 voices

A commentator

Theodoret of Cyrus

INTERPRETATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS · Written before 458.

proposed

The elect are those who believed.… The rest were hardened because of their unbelief.

A commentator

Diodorus of Tarsus

PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH · Written before 390.

proposed

What was Israel seeking? The promise that they would be made sons and heirs of the universe.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Romans 19 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

"What then? Israel hath not obtained that, which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it and the rest were blinded." He had said that God did not cast off His people; and to show in what sense He had not cast them off, he takes refuge in the Prophets again. And having shown by them that the more part of the Jews were lost, that he might not seem to be again bringing forward an accusation of his own, and to make his discourse offensive, and to be attacking them as enemies, he takes refuge in David and Isaiah. Having then mentioned the state of things in Elijah's time, and shown what grace is, he proceeds, "What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for." Now this is as much what an accuser would say, as what one who was putting a question. For the Jew, he means, is inconsistent with himself when he seeketh for righteousness, which he will not accept. Then to leave them with no excuse, he shows, from those who have accepted it, their unfeeling spirit, as he says, "But the election hath obtained it," and they are the condemnation of the others. And this is what Christ says, "But if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? Wherefore they shall be your judges." For to prevent any one from accusing the nature of the thing, and not their own temper, he points out those who had obtained it. Hence he uses the word with great propriety, to show at once the grace from above and the zeal of these. For it is not to deny free-will that he speaks of their having "obtained" it, but to show the greatness of the good things, and that the greater part was of grace, though not the whole. For we too are in the habit of saying, "so and so chanced to get," "so and so met with," when the gain has been a great one. […]

A commentator

Origen of Alexandria

COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS · Written before 253.

proposed

In these words the Apostle divides Israel into two parts: one of which he calls the election, which has obtained what it was seeking; the other he names "the rest," who not only did not obtain what they were seeking, but were blinded with a spirit of compunction. And he says that God even "gave" to them "eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear, unto this present day," that is, unto the consummation of the age.

The Medieval Church1 voice

A commentator

Thomas Aquinas

Commentary on Romans · Written before 1274.

proposed

Then when he says, what then, he draws the conclusion he intended. And first he sets it out, saying what then shall we say follows from what has been said? This, namely, that Israel, as far as the greater part of its people was concerned, …
9 more voices on this verse

The Medieval Church1 voice

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Romans · Written before 1107.

proposed

Having explained what grace is, that is, that it is a gift of God apart from works, he says that the Israelites, seeking righteousness, did not obtain it, because they sought it poorly and from works, by which it is impossible to obtain it. "But …

The Puritans and the Awakening5 voices

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

They could neither see the light, nor feel the touch, of gospel grace. Blindness and hardness are expressive of the same senselessness and stupidity of spirit. They shut their eyes, and would not see; this was their sin: and then God, in a way of righteous judgment, blinded their eyes, that they could not see; this was their punishment.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

If then there was a remnant left under the Old Testament, when the displays of grace were less clear and the pourings out of the Spirit less plentiful, much more now under the gospel, when the grace of God, which bringeth salvation, appears more illustrious.-- A remnant, a few of many, a remnant of believing Jews when the rest were obstinate in their unbelief.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

): Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for, that is, justification, and acceptance with God (see ch. ix. 31 ), but the election have obtained it. In them the promise of God has its accomplishment, and God's ancient kindness for that people is remembered.

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — leading-punctuation+unbalanced-parens

What then?.... What can be said to the point the apostle is upon? it is as clear as the sun, out of all question, that God has not cast away all the people of the Jews, nor any whom he foreknew, any age or period of time; neither in the time Elijah, nor in the apostle's, he always having a reserve of some for himself; which reserve is owing to a previous choice of them, and that previous choice to ascribed not to any works of theirs, but to his free grace and sovereign pleasure.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

In prayer we deal with God, commune with him, discourse with him: it is said of Elijah ( Jam. v. 17 ) that he prayed in praying. We are then likely to pray in praying, to make a business of that duty, when we pray as those that are dealing with God in the duty. Now Elijah in this prayer spoke as if there were one left faithful in Israel but himself.

The Nineteenth Century3 voices

What then? - What is the proper conclusion from this argument? “Israel hath not obtained.” That is, the Jews as a people have not obtained what they sought. They sought the favor of God by their own merit; and as it was impossible to obtain it in that manner, they have, as a people, failed of obtaining his favor at all, and will be rejected. That which he seeketh for - To wit, salvation by their own obedience to the Law.

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

What then?--How stands the fact? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for--better, "What Israel is in search of (that is, Justification, or acceptance with God--see on Ro 9:31); this he found not; but the election (the elect remnant of Israel) found it, and the rest were hardened," or judicially given over to the "hardness of their own hearts."

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

What then? - What is the real state of the case before us? Israel - the body of the Jewish people, have not obtained that which they so earnestly desire, i.e. to be continued, as they have been hitherto, the peculiar people of God; but the election hath obtained it - as many of them as have believed in Jesus Christ, and accepted salvation through him: this is the grand scheme of the election by grace; God chooses to make those his peculiar people who believe in his Son, and none other shall enjoy the blessings of his kingdom. Those who would not receive him are blinded; they have shut their eyes against the light, and are in the very circumstances of those mentioned by the Prophet Isaiah, Isa 29:10.

The words behind it

16 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    2 Corinthians 4:4

    The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers so they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

    it leads to

    • John 12:40

      “He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, so that they cannot see with their eyes, and understand with their hearts, and turn, and I would heal them.”

    • Acts 26:18

      to open their eyes, so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those sanctified…

    • 2 Corinthians 3:14

      But their minds were closed. For to this day the same veil remains at the reading of the old covenant. It has not been lifted, because only in Christ can it be removed.

    • Isaiah 6:10

      Make the hearts of this people calloused; deafen their ears and close their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts, and turn and be healed.”

    • 1 John 5:19

      We know that we are of God, and that the whole world is under the power of the evil one.

  • Through

    Romans 11:25

    I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers, so that you will not be conceited: A hardening in part has come to Israel, until the full number of the Gentiles…

    it leads to

    • Luke 21:24

      They will fall by the edge of the sword and be led captive into all the nations. And Jerusalem will be trodden down by the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.

    • 2 Corinthians 3:14–16

      But their minds were closed. For to this day the same veil remains at the reading of the old covenant. It has not been lifted, because only in Christ can it be removed.

  • Through

    Romans 9:18

    Therefore God has mercy on whom He wants to have mercy, and He hardens whom He wants to harden.

    it leads to

    • Romans 11:7–8

      What then? What Israel was seeking, it failed to obtain, but the elect did. The others were hardened,

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

Where this verse is studied

About Romans

The Crucifixion, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
The Crucifixion, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
This page draws on 14 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Epistle to the Romans; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Cyril of Alexandria, EXPLANATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS; Diodorus of Tarsus, PAULINE COMMENTARY FROM THE GREEK CHURCH; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Epistle to the Romans; John Chrysostom, Homily on Romans 19; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Origen of Alexandria, COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS; Theodoret of Cyrus, INTERPRETATION OF THE LETTER TO THE ROMANS; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Romans and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Romans.