The claim. The armor equips the Christian for an advance, not only a defence. Verse 12 names the opponents before verse 13 names the gear (“principalities… powers… the rulers of the darkness of this world”), and the intercession stream reads that as ground to be contested. Dutch Sheets (Intercessory Prayer, 1996; Authority in Prayer, 2006) holds that the intercessor's authority extends to engaging those powers under the Spirit's leading. John Eckhardt (Deliverance and Spiritual Warfare Manual, 2014) systematizes the same engagement as normal pastoral ministry, and Cindy Jacobs (Possessing the Gates of the Enemy: A Training Manual for Militant Intercession, 1991) gave the movement its name for it. Summarised, cited only, not quoted.
The critique. The passage's own verb is stēnai, “to stand” (Eph 6:11, 13, 14), and it is what the armor is for: ground already won, held. Five pieces are defensive; only the sword (machaira) and arguably the gospel-shod feet advance. On this reading a militant, territory-taking programme asks the metaphor for more than the verb gives.
Sources — claim: Sheets, Eckhardt, Jacobs, works named above (in copyright; summarised, cite-only). Critique: the biblical text itself (Eph 6:11–14, stēnai) and the standing-not-storming reading common in the Ephesians commentaries. Both readings stand here as they are held; this page names them and leaves the question open.