Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Matthew 26:22

in Matthew 26

They were deeply grieved and began to ask Him one after another, “Surely not I, Lord?”

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

And they were exceeding sorrowful, and began to say unto him every one, Is it I, Lord?

KJV

And they were exceeding sorrowful, and began every one of them to say unto him, Lord, is it I?

This verse in Matthew 26

Commentary

15 notes on this verse

A commentator

Jerome

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 420.

(Verse 22.) And greatly saddened, they began to each say: Am I the one, Lord? And certainly the eleven apostles knew that they had not thought anything like that against the Lord: but they believed more in their teacher than in themselves, fearing their own weakness, they sadly asked about the sin whose consciousness they did not have.

This site's exposition

was reclining with the twelve

on Matthew 26:20-22

When evening came, Jesus was reclining with the twelve for their last meal together before the cross. He says "one of you will betray Me" in the middle of the meal. Each of them asks about himself, "Surely not I, Lord," and Henry notes that none of them names Judas.

This site's exposition

They were deeply grieved

Jerome says none of the eleven had planned to betray Jesus, yet each trusted the word of the Lord above his own heart. Each disciple feared his own weakness. Matthew Henry compares Hazael in 2 Kings 8:13, who could scarcely believe the evil foretold of him.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers5 voices

A commentator

Origen of Alexandria

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 253.

proposed

Some one may argue, (e. g. The Ebionites) that because Jesus kept the Passover with Jewish observances, we ought to do the same as followers of Christ, not remembering that Jesus was made under the Law, though not that He should leave under the Law (Gal. 4:4.) those who were under it, but should lead them out of it; how much less fitting then is it, that those who before were without the Law, should afterwards enter in? We celebrate spiritually the things which were carnally celebrated in the Law, keeping the Passover in the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth, (1 Cor. 5:8. John 6:53.) according to the will of the Lamb, who said, Except ye eat my flesh and drink my blood, ye shall not have life in you. Or, He spoke generally, to prove the nature of each of their hearts, and to evince the wickedness of Judas, who would not believe in One who knew his heart. I suppose that at first he supposed that the thing was hid from Him, deeming Him man, which was of unbelief; but when he saw that his heart was known, he embraced the concealment offered by this general way of speaking, which was shamelesness. This also shows the goodness of the disciples, that they believed Christ's words more than their own consciences, for they began each to say, Lord, is it I? For they knew by what Jesus had taught them that human nature is readily turned to evil, and is in continual struggle with the niters of the darkness of this world; (Eph. 6:12.) whence they ask as in fear, for by reason of our weakness the future is an object of dread to us. When the Lord saw the disciples thus alarmed for themselves, He pointed out the traitor by the mark of the prophetic declaration, He that hath eaten bread with me hath wantonly overthrown me. (Ps. 41:9.)

A commentator

Leo the Great

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 461.

proposed

(Serm. 58.3.) He shows that the conscience of His betrayer was known to Him, not meeting his wickedness with a harsh and open rebuke, that penitence might find a readier way to one who had not been disgraced by public dismissal.

A commentator

Jerome

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 420.

proposed

Judas acts in every thing to remove all suspicion of his treachery.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 81 · Written before 407.

proposed

Intolerable sorrow thereupon seized that holy company. And John indeed saith, they "were in doubt, and looked one upon another," and each of them asked in fear concerning himself, although conscious to themselves of no such thing. But this evangelist saith, that "being exceeding sorrowful, they began every one of them to say unto Him, Is it I, Lord?" Mark at what time He discovered him. It was when it was His will to deliver the rest from this trouble, for they were even dead with the fear, wherefore also they were instant with their questions. But not only as desiring to deliver them from their distress He did this, but also as willing to amend the traitor. For since after having often heard it generally, he continued incorrigible, being past feeling, He being minded to make him feel more, takes off his mask.

A commentator

Origen of Alexandria

COMMENTARY ON MATTHEW 81 · Written before 253.

proposed

Perhaps someone will ask: If the twelve apostles all had clean consciences (that is, if they were all innocent of any act of betrayal against the teacher), why were they "sorrowful" at the news that he would be betrayed, as though it could have been one of them to whom he was referring? I believe that each of the disciples knew from the things Jesus had taught them that human nature is unstable and vulnerable to be turned toward sin and that in struggling "against the principalities and powers and rulers of this world of darkness" a man can be besieged and fall or be so weakened by the power of the enemy that he becomes evil. Aware of these things, then, each disciple was "very sorrowful" because Christ had said "one of you will betray me." And each disciple, not knowing what he might do in the future, began to inquire one by one: "Is it I, Lord?" Yet, if the apostles had good reason to fear that they might betray him, we who have not yet tasted of perfection must also be afraid of falling victim to future weakness. This is why the apostle said, "I am certain that neither death nor life … is able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus." But whoever is not yet perfect should remain aware that he is still capable of falling.
7 more voices on this verse

The Medieval Church2 voices

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 1107.

proposed

The other disciples were agonized, for though the conscience of each was clear, they put more trust in Christ than in themselves since He knew their hearts better than they did.

A commentator

Thomas Aquinas

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 1274.

proposed

Then follows the effect, and it is a twofold effect: sorrow and doubt. As to the sorrow, he says, and they were very much troubled. And why? They were troubled at the death of Christ, because it was bitter for them to be deprived of …

The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices

And they were exceeding sorrowful,.... Partly that Christ should be betrayed at all, into the hands of his enemies, by whom they knew he would be ill used; and partly, that so vile an action should be done, by one from among themselves; and greatly, because they knew not, nor could not conceive, who of them could be guilty of such an horrid sin: and began everyone of them to say unto him, Lord, is it I? excepting Judas, who afterwards spoke for himself.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

29 . [3.] It troubled them most of all, that they were left at uncertainty which of them it was, and each of them was afraid for himself, lest, as Hazael speaks ( 2 Kings viii. 13 ), he was the dog that should do this great thing.

The Nineteenth Century3 voices

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

They were exceeding sorrowful - That is, the eleven who were innocent; and the hypocritical traitor, Judas, endeavored to put on the appearance of sorrow. Strange! Did he not know that Christ knew the secrets of his soul! Or had his love of money so far blinded him, as to render him incapable of discerning even this, with which he had been before so well acquainted?
We read, in the beginning of this passage, how our Lord Jesus Christ was betrayed into the hands of his deadly enemies. The priests and scribes, anxious to put him to death, were at a loss how to effect their purpose, for fear of an uproar among the people. At this juncture a fitting instrument for carrying out their designs offered himself to them in the person of Judas Iscariot. That false apostle undertook to deliver his Master into their hands for thirty pieces of silver.

A commentator

J.C. Ryle

1816–1900

Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew (1856)

proposed

We read, in the beginning of this passage, how our Lord Jesus Christ was betrayed into the hands of his deadly enemies. The priests and scribes, anxious to put him to death, were at a loss how to effect their purpose, for fear of an uproar among the people. At this juncture a fitting instrument for carrying out their designs offered himself to them in the person of Judas Iscariot. That false apostle undertook to deliver his Master into their hands for thirty pieces of silver. There are few blacker pages in all history than the character and conduct of Judas Iscariot: there is no more awful evidence of the wickedness of man. A poet of our own has said that “sharper than a serpent’s tooth is a thankless child”; but what shall we say of a disciple who would betray his own Master: an apostle who could sell Christ? Surely this was not the least bitter part of the cup of suffering which our Lord drank. Let us learn in the first place from these verses that a man may enjoy great privileges, and make a great religious profession, and yet his heart all the time may not be right before God. Judas Iscariot had the highest possible religious privileges. He was a chosen apostle and companion of Christ; he was an eyewitness of our Lord’s miracles and a hearer of his sermons; he saw what Abraham and Moses never saw, and heard what David and Isaiah never heard; he lived in the society of the eleven apostles; he was a fellow-laborer with Peter, James and John: but for all this his heart was never changed. He clung to one darling sin. Judas Iscariot made a reputable profession of religion: there was nothing but what was right and proper and becoming in his outward conduct. Like the other apostles, he appeared to believe and to give up all for Christ’s sake: like them, he was sent forth to preach and work miracles. No one of the eleven seems to have suspected him of hypocrisy.

How the passage was read

On Matthew 26:17-30

On Matthew 26:17-30

The meal on the table

“The first day of Unleavened Bread” places this meal at Passover (Pesach), the spring feast remembering the exodus, kept then as a lamb eaten with unleavened flatbread (matzah) and wine after the day's Temple sacrifice. The bread Jesus broke and the cup He blessed were the feast's own elements; the hymn they sang going out (26:30) would by long custom have been from the Hallel, Psalms 113–118, the psalms sung at Passover. The Last Supper is not a new ceremony dropped into history; it is the exodus meal, taken up and given its fulfillment.

This section is reception history: how the passage was read and kept in the Jewish tradition. Where a reading parts from an essential of the Christian faith, the section says so at that point.

Sources: Mishnah Pesachim 10:5–7 (the cups and the Hallel) · The Lord's Supper (this site's study)

The words behind it

12 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

7 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    John 21:17

    Jesus asked a third time, “Simon son of John, do you love Me?” Peter was deeply hurt that Jesus had asked him a third time, “Do you love Me?” “Lord, You know all things,”…

    it leads to

    • John 13:38

      “Will you lay down your life for Me?” Jesus replied. “Truly, truly, I tell you, before the rooster crows, you will deny Me three times.

    • Mark 14:72

      And immediately the rooster crowed a second time. Then Peter remembered the word that Jesus had spoken to him: “Before the rooster crows twice, you will deny Me three times.” And he broke down…

    • John 16:30

      Now we understand that You know all things and that You have no need for anyone to question You. Because of this, we believe that You came from God.”

    • John 14:15

      If you love Me, you will keep My commandments.

    • John 15:10

      If you keep My commandments, you will remain in My love, just as I have kept My Father’s commandments and remain in His love.

  • Through

    Luke 22:23

    Then they began to question among themselves which of them was going to do this.

    it leads to

    • John 13:22–25

      The disciples looked at one another, perplexed as to which of them He meant.

    • Mark 14:19

      They began to be grieved and to ask Him one after another, “Surely not I?”

Where this verse is studied

About Matthew

The Agony in the Garden — Gustave Doré (engraving), public domain
The Agony in the Garden — Gustave Doré (engraving), public domain
This page draws on 13 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew; Jerome, Commentary on Matthew; Jerome, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; John Chrysostom, Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 81; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Leo the Great, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Origen of Alexandria, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Origen of Alexandria, COMMENTARY ON MATTHEW 81; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Matthew and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Matthew.