Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Matthew 12:14

in Matthew 12

But the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

But the Pharisees went out, and took counsel against him, how they might destroy him.

KJV

Then the Pharisees went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him.

This verse in Matthew 12

Commentary

14 notes on this verse

A commentator

Jerome

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 420.

(Verse 14) But the Pharisees went out and plotted against him, how they might destroy him. The reason they plot against the Lord is envy. For what had he done to provoke the Pharisees to kill him? It was because he had stretched out his hand. For who among the Pharisees does not stretch out their hand on the Sabbath, carrying food and extending a cup, and all the other things that are necessary for sustenance?

This site's exposition

the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus

After a healing they could not deny, “the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus”. Mark 3:6 names the Herodians joining them, an alliance of religious and political enemies who agreed on nothing else. Within a single chapter the Sabbath question has become a capital matter.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers2 voices

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 40 · Written before 407.

proposed

What then did they? They go forth, it is said, and take counsel together to slay Him. For "the Pharisees," saith the Scripture, "went out and held a council against Him, how they might destroy Him." They had received no injury, yet they went about to slay Him. So great an evil is envy. For not against strangers only, but even against our own, is it ever warring. And Mark saith, they took this counsel with the Herodians. What then doth the gentle and meek One? He withdrew, on being aware of it.

A commentator

Hilary of Poitiers

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 367.

proposed

The Pharisees are moved with jealousy at what had been done; because beholding the outward body of a man, they did not recognize the God in His works; The Pharisees went out and sought counsel against him, how they might destroy him.

The Medieval Church3 voices

A commentator

Rabanus Maurus

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 856.

proposed

He says, went out because their mind was alien from the Lord. They took counsel how they might destroy life, not how themselves might find life.

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 1107.

proposed

What spite! When good is done to them they become enraged. Jesus withdrew, as it was not yet the time for His Passion, and also to spare them from falling to the crime of murder. He did this to show that it is not God-pleasing …

A commentator

Thomas Aquinas

Commentary on Matthew · Written before 1274.

proposed

But the Pharisees went away, namely, from the synagogue, in fulfillment of Psalm 54 (v. 3): "The synagogue of powerful men has risen against me." They went away, therefore, to do evil, as it says in Job (1:12): "So Satan went forth from the presence …
7 more voices on this verse

The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices

Then the Pharisees went out,.... Of the synagogue, being, as Luke says, filled with madness, at the unanswerableness of his arguments; and because of the violation of the sabbath, as they thought; and most of all, because of the miracle wrought by him; and which was so glaringly a proof of his being Lord of the sabbath, and could not fail of creating him esteem among the people: and held a council against him, how they might destroy him.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

What an indignity was hereby put upon our Lord Jesus, to run him down as an outlaw ( qui caput gerit lupinum--carries a wolf's head ), and the plague of his country, who was the greatest blessing of it, the Glory of his people Israel! Christ's absconding upon this occasion, and the privacy he chose, to decline, not his work, but his danger; because his hour was not yet come (

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — unbalanced-parens

The Nineteenth Century5 voices

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

Held a council against him - Nothing sooner leads to utter blindness, and hardness of heart, than envy. There are many who abandon themselves to pleasure-taking and debauchery on the Sabbath, who condemn a poor man whom necessity obliges to work on what is termed a holiday, or a national fast.
The first thing which demands our notice in this passage is the desperate wickedness of the human heart, which it exemplifies. Silenced and defeated by our Lord’s arguments, the Pharisees plunged deeper and deeper into sin. They “went out and held a council against Him how they might destroy Him.” What evil had our Lord done, that he should be so treated? None, none at all. No charge could be brought against his life. He was holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners; his days were spent in doing good. No charge could be brought against his teaching.

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

Then the Pharisees went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him--This is the first explicit mention of their murderous designs against our Lord. Luke (Lu 6:11) says, "they were filled with madness, and communed one with another what they might do to Jesus." But their doubt was not, whether to get rid of Him, but how to compass it.

A commentator

J.C. Ryle

1816–1900

Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew (1856)

proposed

The first thing which demands our notice in this passage is the desperate wickedness of the human heart, which it exemplifies. Silenced and defeated by our Lord’s arguments, the Pharisees plunged deeper and deeper into sin. They “went out and held a council against Him how they might destroy Him.” What evil had our Lord done, that he should be so treated? None, none at all. No charge could be brought against his life. He was holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners; his days were spent in doing good. No charge could be brought against his teaching. He had proved it to be agreeable to Scripture and reason, and no reply had been made to his proofs. But it mattered little how perfectly he lived or taught: he was hated. This is human nature appearing in its true colors! The unconverted heart hates God, and will show its hatred whenever it dares, and has a favorable opportunity. It will persecute God’s witnesses; it will dislike all who have anything of God’s mind and are renewed after his image. Why were so many of the prophets killed? Why were the names of the apostles cast out as evil by the Jews? Why were the early martyrs slain? Why were John Hus, and Jerome of Prague, andRidley and Latimer burned at the stake? Not for any sins that they had sinned, not for any wickedness they had committed. They all suffered because they were godly men. And human nature, unconverted, hates godly men because it hates God. It must never surprise true Christians if they meet with the same treatment that the Lord Jesus met with. “Marvel not if the world hates you” ( 1 John 3:13 ). It is not the utmost consistency or the closest walk with God that will exempt them from the enmity of the natural man. They need not torture their consciences by fancying that if they were only more faultless and consistent, everybody would surely love them. It is all a mistake.
This account is found also in Mar 3:6-12. Mat 12:14 The Pharisees ... held a council ... - Mark adds that the Herodians also took a part in this plot. They were probably a “political” party attached firmly to Herod Antipas, son of Herod the Great, tetrarch of Galilee. He was the same man who had imprisoned and beheaded John the Baptist, and to whom the Saviour, when arraigned, was sent by Pilate. See the notes at Luk 3:1. He was under Roman authority, and was a strong advocate of Roman power. All the friends of the family of Herod were opposed to Christ, and ever ready to join any plot against his life. They remembered, doubtless, the attempts of Herod the Great against him when he was the babe of Bethlehem, and they were stung with the memory of the escape of Jesus from his bloody hands. The attempt against him now, on the part of the Pharisees, was the effect of “envy.” They hated his popularity, they were losing their influence, and they therefore resolved to take him out of the way. Mat 12:15 But when Jesus knew it, he withdrew himself ... - He knew of the plot which they had formed against his life; but his hour was not yet come, and he therefore sought security. By remaining, his presence would only have provoked them further and endangered his own life. He acted, therefore, the part of prudence and withdrew. Compare the notes at Mat 10:23. Mark adds that he withdrew “to the sea;” that is, to the Sea of Galilee. or Tiberias. […]

How the passage was read

On Matthew 12:1-14

On Matthew 12:1-14

What the Pharisees were objecting to

The Sabbath is the seventh day of the week, Friday sundown to Saturday sundown, on which the Torah forbids work (Exodus 20:8–11). By Jesus' day the oral tradition had worked that command out into detailed categories of forbidden labor, later written down in the Mishnah (the first great code of Jewish oral law, compiled about AD 200) as thirty-nine categories, reaping and threshing among them (Mishnah Shabbat 7:2). Observant Jews keep these categories to this day.

So the disciples' act reads differently on each side. Plucking a neighbor's standing grain by hand was expressly permitted by the Law itself (Deuteronomy 23:25); this was never about stealing. But in the tradition's categories, plucking counted as reaping, and rubbing the heads as threshing: work, on the day work is forbidden. That is the collision in the scene, and it is why Jesus answers from Scripture's own precedents (David and the showbread, the priests in the Temple) and from who He is: “the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.”

This section is reception history: how the passage was read and kept in the Jewish tradition. Where a reading parts from an essential of the Christian faith, the section says so at that point.

Sources: Mishnah Shabbat 7:2 (the thirty-nine categories) · Deuteronomy 23:25 (plucking permitted) · Exodus 20:8–11 (the command itself)

The words behind it

11 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

  • ἘξελθόντεςHaving gone out

    exelthontesG1831 →216 times

  • δὲnow

    deG1161 →2765 times

  • οἱthe

    hoiG3588 →19766 times

  • ΦαρισαῖοιPharisees

    pharisaioiG5330 →97 times

  • συμβούλιονa counsel

    sumboulionG4824 →8 times

  • ἔλαβονheld

    elabonG2983 →257 times

  • κατ᾽against

    kat᾽G2596 →468 times

  • αὐτοῦHim

    autouG846 →5565 times

  • ὅπωςhow

    hoposG3704 →52 times

  • αὐτὸνHim

    autonG846 →5565 times

  • ἀπολέσωσιν.¶they may destroy.

    apolesosinG622 →90 times

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    John 5:18

    Because of this, the Jews tried all the harder to kill Him. Not only was He breaking the Sabbath, but He was even calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God.

    it leads to

    • John 10:30

      I and the Father are one.”

    • John 10:33

      “We are not stoning You for any good work,” said the Jews, “but for blasphemy, because You, who are a man, declare Yourself to be God.”

    • John 19:7

      “We have a law,” answered the Jews, “and according to that law He must die, because He declared Himself to be the Son of God.”

    • John 8:58

      “Truly, truly, I tell you,” Jesus declared, “before Abraham was born, I am!”

    • John 5:23

      so that all may honor the Son just as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him.

  • Through

    John 10:39

    At this, they tried again to seize Him, but He escaped their grasp.

    it leads to

    • John 7:30

      So they tried to seize Him, but no one laid a hand on Him, because His hour had not yet come.

    • John 8:59

      At this, they picked up stones to throw at Him. But Jesus was hidden and went out of the temple area.

  • Through

    Luke 6:11

    But the scribes and Pharisees were filled with rage and began to discuss with one another what they might do to Jesus.

    it leads to

    • Acts 5:33

      When the Council members heard this, they were enraged, and they resolved to put the apostles to death.

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

Where this verse is studied

About Matthew

The Sermon on the Mount, Carl Bloch, 1877. Public domain.
The Sermon on the Mount, Carl Bloch, 1877. Public domain.
This page draws on 12 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Hilary of Poitiers, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jerome, Commentary on Matthew; John Chrysostom, Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 40; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Rabanus Maurus, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Matthew and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Matthew.