mannafest.faith

1 Enoch 7 · 10 · 15–16 · Featured Study · A Labeled Study Resource, Not Canon

The Giants of 1 Enoch

Genesis names them in one verse and moves on: the Nephilim, “the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown.” 1 Enoch stops and looks. It describes the Watchers’ offspring as giants the earth could not feed — devourers who turned on mankind, then on the animals, then on each other — until the earth itself “laid accusation against the lawless ones.” And then the book says the strangest, most consequential thing in its pages: when the giants’ bodies died, something came out— spirits that keep the earth as their dwelling, hunger without eating, and harass mankind “until the day of the consummation.” That is where the Judaism of Jesus’s day got its answer to a question Scripture never directly answers: where did the demons come from? This page lays the whole account out honestly — and follows the canon’s own giants thread from Genesis 6 all the way to Gath.

The Earth Could Not Feed Them

1 Enoch 7 — the indictment, plainly and honestly
“And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another’s flesh, and drink the blood. Then the earth laid accusation against the lawless ones.”1 Enoch 7:4–6 (Charles, 1917) — a labeled study resource, not canon

The escalation is deliberate: first the giants consume what men produce, then men themselves, then every order of creature, then each other — ending at the one act the Torah singles out with horror, the drinking of blood. It is a portrait of appetite without limit, and its climax is legal, not lurid: the earth files suit. Genesis says the same thing in its own register: “the earth was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence” (Gen 6:11, ASV). In both books, the Flood is not an overreaction; it is an answer to a courtroom already in session.

Said honestly: 7:2 gives the giants’ height as “three thousand ells” — a deliberately fantastic figure in the text’s own legendary register, printed here as the text gives it, asserted as nothing more. The book’s argument never rests on the number; it rests on the violence.

Bruegel's Fall of the Rebel Angels (1562) — the descent that fathered the giants, as the old masters imagined heaven's rebellion.
Bruegel's Fall of the Rebel Angels (1562) — the descent that fathered the giants, as the old masters imagined heaven's rebellion.
Public domainPieter Brueghel the ElderWikimedia Commons →

What Came Out of Them

1 Enoch 15–16 — the Second Temple answer to where demons came from
“And now, the giants, who are produced from the spirits and flesh, shall be called evil spirits upon the earth, and on the earth shall be their dwelling. Evil spirits have proceeded from their bodies… they take no food, but nevertheless hunger and thirst, and cause offences. And these spirits shall rise up against the children of men and against the women, because they have proceeded from them.”1 Enoch 15:8–9, 11–12 (Charles, 1917)

Because the giants were born of two natures — spirit from their fathers, flesh from their mothers — the book reasons that death could only take half of them. The flesh fell; the spirit remained, earthbound, dispossessed, and hungry. Read with that frame in mind, several strange features of the Gospels’ demon encounters snap into focus — not as proof of dependence, but as a shared first-century understanding:

RESTLESS WITHOUT A BODY

“But the unclean spirit, when he is gone out of the man, passeth through waterless places, seeking rest, and findeth it not.” Matt 12:43

CLINGING TO THE LAND

The Gerasene spirits dwell among tombs and beg Jesus “that he would not send them away out of the country.” Mark 5:10

THEY KNOW THE DEADLINE

“Art thou come hither to torment us before the time?” Matt 8:29 — the same fixed day 1 En 16:1 calls “the day of the consummation, the great judgement.”

Where demons come from — the positions, and who holds themcontested

Spirits of the dead giants — the Enochic reading

The Second Temple view this page traces, and the early church’s own for its first centuries: Justin Martyr writes that the angels’ children by women “are those who are called demons” (Second Apology 5), and Athenagoras teaches the same. On the modern roster, Michael Heiser (Demons, Lexham, 2020) presents this as the understanding Jesus’s hearers actually had.

Fallen angels, simply

The later and long-standing majority view — from Augustine forward, most of Western theology has identified demons with the angels who fell, without an Enochic middle step. Held across confessional lines and honored here.

The honest floor

Scripture describes what demons do and what Christ does to them; it never narrates their origin. Both positions above are inferences — one from Second Temple context, one from later synthesis — and this page stamps no verdict. The doctrine’s full treatment lives on the Demonology study.

The Canon's Own Giants Thread

Genesis 6 to Gath — the seed war the Bible itself traces

Whatever a reader does with 1 Enoch, the giants thread itself is canon. Genesis says the Nephilim were in the earth “in those days, and also after that” — and the Bible keeps its word about the “after that.” The spies meet Anakim descended from the Nephilim; Joshua drives the Anakim out of the hill country but leaves a remnant in three Philistine cities; and one of those three cities is Gath — where, generations later, a giant champion steps out to defy the armies of the living God.

The thread runs Gen 3:15 → Gen 6 → Num 13 → Josh 11 → Gath → the shepherd with five stones. The full David & Goliath story page is coming to the Iconic Stories series; until then the verses above are live doors into every link of the chain.

Osmar Schindler's David und Goliath (1888) — the seed war's most famous single combat: the remnant of the giants against the anointed of the LORD.
Osmar Schindler's David und Goliath (1888) — the seed war's most famous single combat: the remnant of the giants against the anointed of the LORD.
Public domainOsmar Schindler (1869-1927)Wikimedia Commons →

The Stronger Man

what Christ does with all of this

Whichever origin story a reader holds, the Gospels’ portrait is the same: the spirits are real, they are hostile, they know their sentence — and they obey Jesus of Nazareth like defeated soldiers. He does not perform rituals over them. He speaks, and they go. He himself explains what His hearers were watching:

“Or how can one enter into the house of the strong man, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house.” Matthew 12:29 (ASV)

John says it as a mission statement: “To this end was the Son of God manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil” (1 John 3:8, ASV). 1 Enoch’s giants are a labeled study resource, not Scripture, and this page asserts nothing beyond what each text says for itself; the Bible remains the sixty-six books. But the old book preserves what the demons’ own words in the Gospels confirm: the powers of darkness have a fixed appointment they cannot move — and the Son of Man who keeps that calendar has already walked into the strong man’s house.

The Voices on the Giants

relevance-gated — cited to the specific work, so you can go to it
Michael Heiser

Demons: What the Bible Really Says About the Powers of Darkness (Lexham Press, 2020)

Cite-only, ≤50 words, per the modern-voice rule. The roster's systematic treatment of the Second Temple view this page traces — that the demons of the Gospels were understood in Jesus's day as the disembodied spirits of the dead giants. Reversing Hermon (Defender, 2017) carries the same case into the New Testament.

Justin Martyr

Second Apology, ch. 5 (c. AD 153)

Public domain, early-church witness: Justin taught that the angels transgressed with women, begot children who are “those who are called demons” — evidence that the Enochic reading was the church's own in its first centuries.

Chuck Missler

Learn the Bible in 24 Hours (Thomas Nelson) — the Genesis 6 session

Marcus Brown's formative teacher on the angelic reading of Genesis 6 and its “days of Noah” stakes (Matt 24:37) — the frame in which the giants are not mythology but the reason for the Flood.

Gary Wayne

The Genesis 6 Conspiracy (2014)

Cite-only. The roster's most extended popular treatment of the POST-flood giants — the “and also after that” of Genesis 6:4 followed through Anakim, Rephaim, and Gath. A topical synthesis, not a commentary, and labeled so.

George W. E. Nickelsburg

1 Enoch 1 (Hermeneia; Fortress Press, 2001)

The standard critical commentary on the Book of the Watchers — the scholarly anchor for chapters 7, 10, and 15–16 and their internal logic: violence, accusation, sentence, residue.

Marcus Brown's own commentary leads above all; within a tier, all voices are equal.

Read the Great Books

the works that carry this study — go further than this page

1 Enoch — the Book of the Watchers (chs 1–36)

c. 3rd century BC or earlier — a labeled study resource, not canon

Chapters 7, 10, and 15–16 in full, with chapter-by-chapter study commentary in MannaFest’s own reader.

READ IT →

Justin Martyr — the Second Apology

c. AD 153 · Ante-Nicene Fathers translation, public domain

Chapter 5 — a second-century Christian teaching the Enochic account of the demons in his own words, one lifetime removed from the apostles.

READ IT FREE →

The Book of Enoch

R. H. Charles · 2nd ed. 1912, translation reprinted 1917

The translation this site hosts, with Charles’s critical notes on the giants chapters.

READ IT FREE →

Go on from here

— this page's own doors

Keep studying

— more from 1 Enoch

Drafted from MannaFest's Giants of 1 Enoch research brief (2026-08-11). All 1 Enoch quotations verified verbatim against the site's resident R. H. Charles 1917 text; canon quotations ASV from the resident floor. Scholarship: Nickelsburg, 1 Enoch 1 (Hermeneia, 2001); Justin Martyr, Second Apology 5 (PD); Heiser, Missler, and Wayne cite-only to the named works. Scripture ASV. Every cited work — the sources registry →