Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Acts 8:21

in Acts 8

You have no part or share in our ministry, because your heart is not right before God.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right before God.

KJV

Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God.

This verse in Acts 8

Commentary

18 notes on this verse

A commentator

Tertullian

On Idolatry · Written before 220.

If you did know it, you ought to have known this also, that you should have nothing more to do with that profession of yours which, of itself, fore-chants the climacterics of others, and might instruct you of its own danger. There is no part nor lot for you in that system of yours. He cannot hope for the kingdom of the heavens, whose finger or wand abuses the heaven.

This site's exposition

May your silver perish with you

on Acts 8:20-23

Peter refuses the offer outright: May your silver perish with you, because you thought you could buy the gift of God with money. Yet he still calls Simon to repent and pray, treating his state as one the Lord may still forgive.

This site's exposition

no part or share

Barnes explains that the word for part means a portion of an inheritance, so Simon had no share in God's grace at all. Matthew Henry notes that Simon was baptized yet insincere. In Arator's words, grace is gained by a right mind.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers5 voices

A commentator

Hippolytus of Rome

Refutation of All Heresies (Book VI), Chapter 2 · Written before 235.

proposed

It seems, then, expedient likewise to explain now the opinions of Simon, a native of Gitta, a village of Samaria; and we shall also prove that his successors, taking a starting-point from him, have endeavoured (to establish) similar opinions under a change of name. This Simon being an adept in sorceries, both making a mockery of many, partly according to the art of Thrasymedes, in the manner in which we have explained above, and partly also by the assistance of demons perpetrating his villany, attempted to deify himself. (But) the man was a (mere) cheat, and full of folly, and the Apostles reproved him in the Acts. [Acts 8:9-24] With much greater wisdom and moderation than Simon, did Apsethus the Libyan, inflamed with a similar wish, endeavour to have himself considered a god in Libya, And inasmuch as his legendary system does not present any wide divergence from the inordinate desire of that silly Simon, it seems expedient to furnish an explanation of it, as one worthy of the attempt made by this man.

A commentator

Hippolytus of Rome

Refutation of All Heresies (Book X), Chapter 8 · Written before 235.

proposed

But that very sapient fellow Simon makes his statement thus, that there is an indefinite power, and that this is the root of the universe. And this indefinite power, he says, which is fire, is in itself not anything which is simple, as the gross bulk of speculators maintain, when they assert that there are four incomposite elements, and have supposed fire, as one of these, to be uncompounded. Simon, on the other hand, alleges that the nature of fire is twofold; and one portion of this twofold (nature) he calls a something secret, and another (a something) manifest. And he asserts that the secret is concealed in the manifest parts of the fire, and that the manifest parts of the fire have been produced from the secret. And he says that all the parts of the fire, visible and invisible, have been supposed to be in possession of a capacity of perception. The world, therefore, he says, that is begotten, has been produced from the unbegotten fire. And it commenced, he says, to exist thus: The Unbegotten One took six primal roots of the principle of generation from the principle of that fire. For he maintains that these roots have been generated in pairs from the fire; and these he denominates Mind and Intelligence, Voice and Name, Ratiocination and Reflection. And he asserts that in the six roots, at the same time, resides the indefinite power, which he affirms to be Him that stood, stands, and will stand. And when this one has been formed into a figure, He will, according to this heretic, exist in the six powers substantially and potentially. And He will be in magnitude and perfection one and the same with that unbegotten and indefinite power, possessing no attribute in any respect more deficient than that unbegotten, and unalterable, and indefinite power. […]

A commentator

Cassiodorus

EXPOSITION OF THE PSALMS 50.19 · Written before 585.

proposed

We must, I think, investigate the fact that often in the divine Scriptures heart stands for understanding.… It may be clear to all without doubting that the source of our thoughts is there, and that good and evil are drawn from there. The seat of …

A commentator

Acts of Peter

The Acts of Peter, III (THE VERCELLI ACTS), IV-XXXII · Written before 200.

proposed

Now after a few days there was a great commotion in the midst of the church, for some said that they had seen wonderful works done by a certain man whose name was Simon, and that he was at Aricia, and they added further that …

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 18 · Written before 407.

proposed

How was it then that they did not strike him dead, as they did Ananias and Sapphira? Because even in the old times, he that gathered sticks on the sabbath-day was put to death as a warning to others and in no other instance did any suffer the same fate. So too on the present occasion, "Peter said to him, Thy money perish, because thou hast imagined that the gift of God is to be purchased with money." Why had not these received the Holy Ghost, when baptized? Either because Philip kept this honor for the Apostles; or, because he had not this gift to impart; or, he was one of the Seven: which is rather to be said.
10 more voices on this verse

The Church Fathers3 voices

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 18 · Written before 407.

proposed

"Thy money with thee to perdition": since thou hast not used it as it ought to be used. These are not words of imprecation, but of chastisement. "To thee," he says, be it to thee: being such. As if one should say, Let it perish along with thy purpose. Hast thou so mean conceptions of the gift of God, that thou hast imagined it to be altogether a thing of man? It is not this. Wherefore also Peter well calls the affair a gift: "Thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money." Dost thou observe how on all occasions they are clean from money?

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 18 · Written before 407.

proposed

"For thine heart is not right in the sight of God." Dost thou see how he does all of malice? To be simple, however, was the thing needed. For had it been done with simplicity, he would have even welcomed his willing mind. Seest thou that to have mean conceptions of great things is to sin doubly?

A commentator

Arator

ON THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 1 · Written before 544.

proposed

Seeing him attempting this, Peter said, "What madness has moved you to this, wretch? Namely, that you think that what the grace of the Lord gives is something for sale. It is not gained by gold but by a [right] disposition [of mind]; nor is …

The Puritans and the Awakening4 voices

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

8 ), no lot in the heavenly Canaan. Secondly, They are those whose hearts are not right in the sight of God, are not animated by a right spirit, nor guided by a right rule, nor directed to the right end.

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — leading-citation-number+unbalanced-parens

A commentator

John Wesley

1703–1791

Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)

proposed

This we are sure St. Paul had not; though he was not inferior to the chief of the apostles. Otherwise he would not have suffered the illness of Epaphroditus to have brought him so near to death, Phil. ii, 25-27; nor have left so useful a fellow labourer as Trophimus sick at Miletus, 2 Tim. iv, 20.
Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter,....

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

"Though thou professest to believe, and art baptized, yet thou art not sincere." We are as our hearts are; if they be not right, we are wrong; and they are open in the sight of God, who knows them, judges them, and judges of us by them.

The Nineteenth Century3 voices

Neither part - You have no “portion” of the grace of God; that is, you are destitute of it altogether. This word commonly denotes the “part” of an inheritance which falls to one when it is divided.

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

proposed

Thou hast neither part nor lot . . . thy heart is not fight, &c.--This is the fidelity of a minister of Christ to one deceiving himself in a very awful manner.

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter - Thou hast no part among the faithful, and no lot in this ministry. That the word κληρος, which we translate lot, is to be understood as implying a spiritual portion, office, etc., see proved in the note on Num 26:55 (note). Thy heart is not right - It is not through motives of purity, benevolence, or love to the souls of men, that thou desirest to be enabled to confer the Holy Ghost; it is through pride, vain glory, and love of money: thou wouldest now give a little money that thou mightest, by thy new gift, gain much.

The words behind it

20 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Hebrews 4:13

    Nothing in all creation is hidden from God’s sight; everything is uncovered and exposed before the eyes of Him to whom we must give account.

    it leads to

    • 1 Corinthians 4:5

      Therefore judge nothing before the appointed time; wait until the Lord comes. He will bring to light what is hidden in darkness and will expose the motives of men’s hearts. At that time each…

    • Psalms 33:13–15

      The LORD looks down from heaven; He sees all the sons of men.

    • Proverbs 15:3

      The eyes of the LORD are in every place, observing the evil and the good.

    • Ecclesiastes 12:14

      For God will bring every deed into judgment, along with every hidden thing, whether good or evil.

    • 2 Corinthians 5:10

      For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive his due for the things done in the body, whether good or bad.

  • Through

    John 21:17

    Jesus asked a third time, “Simon son of John, do you love Me?” Peter was deeply hurt that Jesus had asked him a third time, “Do you love Me?” “Lord, You know all things,”…

    it leads to

    • John 13:38

      “Will you lay down your life for Me?” Jesus replied. “Truly, truly, I tell you, before the rooster crows, you will deny Me three times.

    • Mark 14:72

      And immediately the rooster crowed a second time. Then Peter remembered the word that Jesus had spoken to him: “Before the rooster crows twice, you will deny Me three times.” And he broke down…

  • Through

    Psalms 36:1

    An oracle is in my heart regarding the transgression of the wicked man: There is no fear of God before his eyes.

    it leads to

    • Romans 3:18

      “There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

Where this verse is studied

About Acts

The Pentecost, El Greco, about 1600, Museo del Prado. Public domain.
The Pentecost, El Greco, about 1600, Museo del Prado. Public domain.
This page draws on 14 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Acts of Peter, The Acts of Peter, III (THE VERCELLI ACTS), IV-XXXII; Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Arator, ON THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES 1; Cassiodorus, EXPOSITION OF THE PSALMS 50.19; Hippolytus of Rome, Refutation of All Heresies (Book VI), Chapter 2; Hippolytus of Rome, Refutation of All Heresies (Book X), Chapter 8; J. A. Alexander, The Acts of the Apostles Explained; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homily on Acts 18; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible and Tertullian, On Idolatry.