1 Kingschapter 13
34 verses · BSB1 Kings book hub →
The Disobedient Prophet Is Slain by a Lion, Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain
The section titles are this site's own.
A.A cry against the altar, and a king's hand dried upvv. 1-10
Suddenly, as Jeroboam was standing beside the altar to burn incense, there came a man of God from Judah to Bethel by the word of the LORD. And he cried out against the altar by the word of the LORD, “O altar, O altar, this is what the LORD says: ‘A son named Josiah will be born to the house of David, and upon you he will sacrifice the priests of the high places who burn incense upon you, and human bones will be burned upon you.’” That day the man of God gave a sign, saying, “The LORD has spoken this sign: ‘Surely the altar will be split apart, and the ashes upon it will be poured out.’” Now when King Jeroboam, who was at the altar in Bethel, heard the word that the man of God had cried out against it, he stretched out his hand and said, “Seize him!” But the hand he stretched out toward him withered, so that he could not pull it back. And the altar was split apart, and the ashes poured out, according to the sign that the man of God had given by the word of the LORD. Then the king responded to the man of God, “Intercede with the LORD your God and pray that my hand may be restored.” So the man of God interceded with the LORD, and the king’s hand was restored to him as it was before. Then the king said to the man of God, “Come home with me and refresh yourself, and I will give you a reward.” But the man of God replied, “If you were to give me half your possessions, I still would not go with you, nor would I eat bread or drink water in this place. For this is what I was commanded by the word of the LORD: ‘You must not eat bread or drink water or return by the way you came.’” So the man of God went another way and did not return by the way he had come to Bethel.
1 Kings 13:1-2
The man of God comes from Judah under no name the text gives him, and he speaks against Jeroboam's new altar three centuries before the reform it describes. He names the king who will do it, Josiah, one of only two figures in the Old Testament named in prophecy before birth, the other being Cyrus at Isa 44:28. The altar built to rival Jerusalem hears its own end pronounced at its dedication.
1 Kings 13:1, 1 voiceWhat preachers and commentators have said about these verses, in their own words.
1 Kings 13:1
“Rather, “in the word of the Lord.” The meaning seems to be, not merely that the prophet was bid to come, but that he came in the strength and power of God’s word, a divinely inspired messenger. (Compare 1Ki 13:2, 1Ki 13:5,1Ki 13:32.) By the altar - “On the altar;” i, e. on the ledge, or platform, halfway up the altar, whereupon the officiating priest always stood to sacrifice. Compare 1Ki 12:32 note.”
1 Kings 13:2, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:2
“He cried against the altar - He denounced the destruction of this idolatrous system. A child shall be born - Josiah by name - This is one of the most remarkable and most singular prophecies in the Old Testament. It here most circumstantially foretells a fact which took place three hundred and forty years after the prediction; a fact which was attested by the two nations.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:2
“That the altar he now consecrated should be desecrated. Idolatrous worship will not continue, but the word of the Lord will endure for ever. That the priests of the high places he now made should themselves be made sacrifices to the justice of God, and the first and only sacrifices upon this altar that would be pleasing to him.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Kings 13:3
The sign given the same day is smaller than the prophecy it backs, an altar rent and its ashes spilled now, to certify a word that will not close for three hundred years. Barnes calls this pattern of an immediate sign proving a remote one rare before this point in the history, though it recurs later at 2 Ki 19:29 and Isa 7:14. A hearer who cannot wait three centuries for Josiah gets something to see before he leaves the ground.
1 Kings 13:3, 1 voice
1 Kings 13:3
He gave a sign - A sign of this kind - an immediate prophecy to prove the divine character of a remote prophecy - had scarcely been given before this. In the later history, however, such signs are not unfrequent (compare 2Ki 19:29; Isa 7:14-16). The ashes ... shall be poured out - i. e., “The half-burnt remains of the offerings shall be ignominiously spilled upon the ground.”
1 Kings 13:4-6
Jeroboam's own hand executes the sign: stretched out to seize the prophet, it dries up mid-gesture and the altar splits at the same moment. The king who moments before commanded the man of God's arrest now asks that same man to pray for his healing, and the prayer is granted though nothing in the text says the king's heart changed with his hand. Gill and the bench read the healing as mercy rather than reward, since Jeroboam returns to his idolatry within the chapter.
1 Kings 13:4, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:4-6
“But when in the temple of our God, that wicked king Jeroboam took away the gifts that his father had laid up and offered them to idols on the holy altar, did not his right hand, which he stretched, wither, and his idols, which he called on, were not able to help him? Then, turning to the Lord, he asked for pardon, and at once his hand, which had withered by sacrilege, was healed by true religion.”
Ambrose of Milan· written before 397· Concerning Virginity 2.5.38patristic
1 Kings 13:4
“If God, in justice, harden the hearts of sinners, so that the hand they have stretched out in sin they cannot pull in again by repentance, that is a spiritual judgment, represented by this, and much more dreadful. The sudden healing of the hand that was suddenly dried up, upon his submission,”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Kings 13:5, 3 voices
1 Kings 13:5
“The altar also was rent,.... Split into two parts perhaps, and one fell one way, and the other another; and the ashes poured out from the altar; the ashes of the burnt offering, these were spilled on the ground; all which was done without any outward force, or any visible means thereof: according to the sign which the man of God had given by the word of the Lord; by his direction and order.”
1 Kings 13:5
“We need not suppose a complete shattering of the altar, but rather the appearance of a crack or fissure in the fabric, which, extending from top to bottom, caused the embers and the fragments of the victims to fall until they reached the ground.”
1 Kings 13:5
“How could the gift be acceptable when the altar that should sanctify it was an abomination? It was a reproach to the people, whose hearts were harder than these stones and rent not under the word of the Lord. It was a specimen of what should be done to it in the accomplishment of this prophecy by Josiah; it was now rent, in token of its being then ruined.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Kings 13:6, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:6
“Entreat - the face of the Lord thy God - The face of God is his favor, as we see in many parts of the sacred writings. He says, thy God; for Jeroboam knew that he was not his God, for he was now in the very act of acknowledging other gods, and had no portion in the God of Jacob.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:6
“He wounded, and no hand but his can make whole. Not by his own sacrifice or incense, but by the prayer and intercession of the prophet, whom he had just now threatened and aimed to destroy. The time may come when those that hate the preaching would be glad of the prayers of faithful ministers.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Kings 13:7-8
The king's offer of a meal and a reward is ordinary hospitality, and the man of God's refusal is not personal but obedience to a specific charge. He will not take so much as bread in the place whose altar he has just condemned, half the king's house included in the refusal. Henry reads the courtesy as reasonable and the refusal as necessary, since eating at Bethel would answer the sign with a compromise.
1 Kings 13:7, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:7
“And the king said unto the man of God, come home with me, and refresh thyself,.... By eating a meal with him, after such a journey he had taken, and delivered his prophecies, and put up his prayers for the king: and I will give thee a reward; for his prayers, by means of which his hand was restored to him; but takes no notice of the Lord, the author of this miraculous cure, nor expresses the least degree of thankfulness and gratitude to him.”
1 Kings 13:7
“I will give thee a reward - It was customary to honor a prophet with a gift, if he performed any service that was requested at his hands (see the marginal references).”
1 Kings 13:8, 1 voice
1 Kings 13:8
“And the man of God said unto the king,.... In answer to his civility to him, to assure him it was not out of contempt to him, or ill will to him, or slight of his favour, but in obedience to the will of God: if thou wilt give half of thine house; of the riches in it, and even of his kingdom: I will not go in with thee, neither will I eat bread nor drink water in this place; this idolatrous place; the reason follows.”
1 Kings 13:9-10
The command not to eat, not to drink, and not to return by the same road is laid on the prophet as a positive test distinct from the message itself, obedience proven by a rule that has no reason given in the text. He keeps it exactly, eating nothing and choosing a different way home. Barnes reads the extra command as designed to test obedience under a plain, arbitrary charge rather than a moral one, which is what makes the rest of the chapter possible.
1 Kings 13:9, 1 voice
1 Kings 13:9
“Eat no bread, nor drink water - The reason of the command is evident. The man of God was not to accept the hospitality of any dweller at Bethel, in order to show in a marked way, which men generally could appreciate, God’s abhorrence of the system which Jeroboam had “devised of his own heart.” Nor turn again by the same way that thou camest - This command seems to have been given simply to test the obedience of the prophet by laying him under a positive as well as a moral obligation.”
B.An old prophet's lie: an angel spake unto mevv. 11-19
Now a certain old prophet was living in Bethel, and his sons came and told him all the deeds that the man of God had done that day in Bethel. They also told their father the words that the man had spoken to the king. “Which way did he go?” their father asked. And his sons showed him the way taken by the man of God, who had come from Judah. So the prophet said to his sons, “Saddle the donkey for me.” Then they saddled the donkey for him, and he mounted it and went after the man of God. He found him sitting under an oak tree and asked, “Are you the man of God who came from Judah?” “I am,” he replied. So the prophet said to the man of God, “Come home with me and eat some bread.” But the man replied, “I cannot return with you or eat bread or drink water with you in this place. For I have been told by the word of the LORD: ‘You must not eat bread or drink water there or return by the way you came.’” Then the prophet replied, “I too am a prophet like you, and an angel spoke to me by the word of the LORD, saying, ‘Bring him back with you to your house, so that he may eat bread and drink water.’” The old prophet was lying to him, but the man of God went back with him, ate bread in his house, and drank water.
C.A lion that kills but will not eatvv. 20-32
While they were sitting at the table, the word of the LORD came to the prophet who had brought him back, and the prophet cried out to the man of God who had come from Judah, “This is what the LORD says: ‘Because you have defied the word of the LORD and have not kept the commandment that the LORD your God gave you, but you went back and ate bread and drank water in the place where He told you not to do so, your body shall never reach the tomb of your fathers.’” And after the man of God had finished eating and drinking, the old prophet who had brought him back saddled the donkey for him. As he went on his way, a lion met him on the road and killed him, and his body was left lying in the road, with the donkey and the lion standing beside it. And there were men passing by who saw the body lying in the road with the lion standing beside it, and they went and reported this in the city where the old prophet lived. When the prophet who had brought him back from his journey heard this, he said, “It is the man of God who disobeyed the command of the LORD. Therefore the LORD has delivered him to the lion, and it has mauled him and killed him, according to the word that the LORD had spoken to him.” Then the old prophet instructed his sons, “Saddle the donkey for me.” So they saddled it, and he went and found the body lying in the road, with the donkey and the lion standing beside it. The lion had not eaten the body or mauled the donkey. So the old prophet lifted up the body of the man of God, laid it on the donkey, and brought it back to his own city to mourn for him and bury him. Then he laid the body in his own tomb, and they lamented over him, “Oh, my brother!” After he had buried him, the prophet said to his sons, “When I die, you must bury me in the tomb where the man of God is buried. Lay my bones beside his bones, for the message that he cried out by the word of the LORD against the altar in Bethel and against all the shrines on the high places in the cities of Samaria will surely come to pass.”
1 Kings 13:11-13
An old prophet living at Bethel hears the whole account secondhand from his sons and saddles his ass to catch the man who has already left on foot. Barnes notes that Israelites who kept faith with the Lord after Jeroboam's changes generally left for Jerusalem, so a prophet who stayed at the new center of the calf worship is already a different kind of man than the visitor from Judah. The chase itself is the old prophet's own choice; nothing in the text says he was sent.
1 Kings 13:11, 3 voicesWhat preachers and commentators have said about these verses, in their own words.
1 Kings 13:11
“Some authors assert that [the old prophet] was not an impostor but invited [the true prophet] to eat out of human sympathy in order to refresh and thank him for admonishing Jeroboam. And that is why God did not harm him as a consequence of …”
Ishodad of Merv· written before 850· BOOKS OF SESSIONS 1 KINGS 13:11patristic
1 Kings 13:11
“The truly pious Israelites quitted their homes when Jeroboam made his religious changes, and, proceeding to Jerusalem, strengthened the kingdom of Rehoboam 2Ch 10:16-17. This “old prophet” therefore, who, without being infirm in any way, had remained under Jeroboam, and was even content to dwell at Bethel - the chief seat of the new worship - was devoid of any deep and earnest religious feeling.”
1 Kings 13:11
“And altho' an holy prophet may possibly have continued in the kingdom of Israel, he would never have gone from his own habitation, to dwell at Beth- el, the chief seat of idolatry, unless with design to preach against it: which it is evident he did not; his sons seem to have been present at, and, and to have joined with others in that idolatrous worship.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 Kings 13:14-15
found him sitting under an oak: He finds the man of God resting under an oak and invites him home for bread, the same invitation Jeroboam already made and the man of God already refused. Clarke reads the old prophet's motive as ordinary curiosity about the prophecy just pronounced against Bethel, not malice, and nothing in the narrative before this point contradicts that reading.
The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.
1 Kings 13:14, 1 voice
1 Kings 13:14
“And went after the man of God - I can hardly think that this was with any evil design. His sons had given him such an account of the prediction, the power, and influence of this prophet, that he wished to have a particular acquaintance with him, in order that he might get farther information relative to the solemn import of the prophecy which he had denounced against the idolatry at Beth-el. This good man could not have been an object of the old prophet’s malevolence.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:16-18
The man of God repeats to the old prophet the exact refusal he gave the king, bread and water withheld from Bethel by direct charge from the Lord. The old prophet answers with a claim to his own angelic message countermanding it, and the text stops to tell the reader what the man of God is not told: but he lied unto him. Clarke and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown both weigh why an established prophet would deceive a stranger over so small a matter, and neither settles it beyond calling it a strange and costly lie.
The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.
1 Kings 13:18, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:18
“An angel spake unto me - That he lied unto him is here expressly asserted, and is amply proved by the event. But why should he deceive him? The simple principle of curiosity to know all about this prediction, and the strange facts which had taken place, of which he had heard at second hand by means of his sons, was sufficient to induce such a person to get the intelligence he wished by any means.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:18
“The "angel," that is, "messenger," was his own sons, who were worshippers, perhaps priests, at Beth-el.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 Kings 13:19
He turns back on the strength of another man's claimed revelation and eats the bread he had twice refused. Henry calls the judgments that follow unfathomable, since the deceived man and his deceiver both answer to a Lord who does not explain every dealing in this life. The obedience that survived a king's table falls at a stranger's word.
1 Kings 13:19, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:19
“So he went back with him,.... In which he sinned; for as he had most certainly the command of God not to eat and drink in that place, he ought to have had the countermand from the Lord, and not trusted to another person.”
1 Kings 13:19
“The judgments of God are unfathomable. The deceived and the deceiver are his, and he giveth not account of any of his matters. Certainly there must be a judgment to come, when these things will be called over again, and when those that sinned most and suffered least, in this world, will receive according to their works.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Kings 13:20-22
While the two men sit at the meal that broke the charge, the word of the Lord comes on the old prophet, and the sentence he speaks against his guest is the same word he had just contradicted in his own mouth. Keil and the bench read the case as obedience to a direct, personal word admitting no second revision, even one claiming a fresh angelic message, so the man of God is judged for trusting a report over the command he already had. The false prophet who lied speaks true judgment in the same breath, and the text names the irony without resolving it.
1 Kings 13:20, 1 voice
1 Kings 13:20
“The word of the Lord came unto the prophet that brought him back - “A great clamor,” says Dr. Kennicott, “has been raised against this part of the history, on account of God’s denouncing sentence on the true prophet by the mouth of the false prophet: but if we examine with attention the original words here, they will be found to signify either he who brought him back; or, whom he had brought back; for the very same words, אשר השיבו asher heshibo, occur again in 1Ki 13:23, where they are now translated, whom he had brought back; and where they cannot be translated otherwise.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:21, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:21
“Forasmuch as thou hast disobeyed the mouth of the Lord - It was his duty not to have suffered himself to be persuaded. He should have felt that his obedience was being tried, and should have required, ere he considered himself released, “the same, or as strong, evidence,” as that on which he had received the obligation. Disobedience to certain positive commands of God, was one which it was at this time very important to punish signally, since it was exactly the sin of Jeroboam and his adherents.”
1 Kings 13:21-22
“It was, in one word, disobedience to an express command. Judgment is given upon it: Thy carcase shall not come to the sepulchre of thy fathers, that is, "Thou shalt never reach thy own house, but shalt be a carcase quickly, nor shall thy dead body be brought to the place of thy fathers' sepulchres, to be interred." 2.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Kings 13:22, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:22
“But camest back, and hast eaten bread and drunk water in the place, of the which the Lord did say to thee, eat no bread, nor drink no water,.... Which command he observed when first there, though invited by the king; and yet, after he had got out of the place, was prevailed upon to return and transgress the command: thy carcass shall not come unto the sepulchre of thy fathers; signifying that he should die before he came to the land of Judah, and he should be buried in another place, and which was verified.”
1 Kings 13:22
“Thy carcass shall not come - This intimated to him that he was to die an untimely death, but probably did not specify by what means.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:23-25
The old prophet saddles the ass for his guest but does not ride with him, and Wesley reads the omission as a guilty conscience unwilling to share the road with a man now under sentence. A lion kills him on the way and then behaves against its nature, neither dragging off the body nor touching the ass standing beside it, and travelers report the scene exactly as they find it. Clarke calls the restraint itself the visible hand of God, a judgment stopped precisely at death and carried no further.
1 Kings 13:23, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:23
“Saddled for him - But, it is observable, he doth not accompany him; his guilty conscience making him fear to be involved in the same judgment with him.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 Kings 13:23-24
“Had he never read that man lives not by bread alone? That his death was for the glory of God; for by this it appeared, (1.) That nothing is more provoking to him than disobedience to an express command, though in a small matter, which makes his proceedings against our first parents, for eating the forbidden fruit, the easier to be accounted for.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Kings 13:24, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:24
“Seeing we find it written, that what death soever the just man dieth, that his justice shall not be taken from him: what hurt cometh to God's elect servants (walking no question the way to everlasting life), if for a little while they have some pitiful end? and perhaps it proceedeth from some small sin of theirs, which by such kind of death God's pleasure is that it should be purged.”
Gregory the Dialogist· written before 604· Dialogues, Book 4, Chapter 24patristic
1 Kings 13:24
“A lion met him - and slew him - By permitting himself to be seduced by the old prophet, when he should have acted only on the expressly declared counsel of God, he committed the sin unto death; that is, such a sin as God will punish with the death of the body, while he extends mercy to the soul. See my notes on 1Jn 5:16 (note), 1Jn 5:17 (note). From the instance here related, we see, as in various other cases, that often judgment begins at the house of God.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:26
Word reaches the old prophet at Bethel before he goes to see for himself, and he reads the death correctly on a report alone: this is the man of God, disobedient to the word of the Lord, delivered to the lion by that same word. He states the theology of the judgment without yet naming his own part in causing the disobedience he condemns.
The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.
1 Kings 13:27-28
The old prophet rides out himself now and finds the tableau standing exactly as reported, carcase, ass and lion together in the road. The lion had not eaten the carcase, nor torn the ass, the same restraint Clarke already called preternatural, and Keil reads the standing lion and the untouched ass together as visible proof that the beast acted under commission rather than hunger.
The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.
1 Kings 13:28, 1 voice
1 Kings 13:28
“The lion had not eaten the carcass, nor torn the ass - All here was preternatural. The lion, though he had killed the man, does not devour him; the ass stands quietly by, not fearing the lion; and the lion does not attempt to tear the ass: both stand as guardians of the fallen prophet. How evident is the hand of God in all!”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:29-30
The old prophet lifts the body himself, carries it home on the ass, and buries it in his own grave, the funeral rites of a man mourning someone he calls brother though they met only once. Gill notes the man of God could not lie in his fathers' sepulchre as the sentence required, since he died far from Judah, so the old prophet's own grave becomes the only honor left to give him. The lament, Alas, my brother, is the ordinary funeral cry of the period, the same form Jeremiah later uses at 22:18.
1 Kings 13:29, 1 voice
1 Kings 13:29
“If there by any truth in the vulgar opinion, surely the corpse bled afresh when he touched it, for he was in effect the murderer, and it was but a poor reparation for the injury to inter the dead body.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Kings 13:30, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:30
“And he laid his carcass in his own grave,.... Which he had prepared for himself; for, as he came from Samaria, it could not be the sepulchre of his fathers; and this was showing all the respect, and doing all the honour to him, he well could: and they mourned over him; the prophet and his sons: saying, alas, my brother; which was an usual form of lamentation at funerals in later times, see Jer 22:18.”
1 Kings 13:30
“Alas, my brothers - This lamentation is very simple, very short, and very pathetic. Perhaps the old prophet said it as much in reference to himself, who had been the cause of his untimely death, as in reference to the man of God, whose corpse he now committed to the tomb. But the words may be no more than the burden of each line of the lamentation which was used on this occasion. See instances of this among the Asiatics in the note on Jer 22:18 (note).”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:31-32
Lay my bones beside his bones: The old prophet asks to be buried in the same grave, and Henry reads his reason as plainly stated: what the man of God cried against Bethel's altar will surely come to pass, and he wants his own bones lying where they will be safe when it does. Three centuries later at 2 Ki 23:16-18, Josiah burns the bones of Bethel's priests on that same altar and, seeing the marker, spares this one grave by name, both men's bones inside it. The old prophet's request outlives his lie and secures what his disobedient guest's own obedience could not.
1 Kings 13:31, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:31
“Lay my bones beside his bones - This argues a strong conviction in the mind of the old prophet, that the deceased was a good and holy man of God; and he is willing to have place with him in the general resurrection.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:31
"Gather not my soul with the sinners of Beth-el, but with the man of God." The reason he gives is because what he cried against the altar of Beth-el, that men's bones should be burnt upon it, shall surely come to pass,
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
1 Kings 13:32, 3 voices
1 Kings 13:32
“In the cities of Samaria - It is most certain that Samaria, or as it is called in Hebrew Shomeron, was not built at this time. We are expressly told that Omri, king of Israel, founded this city on the hill which he bought for two talents of silver, from a person of the name of Shemer, after whom he called the city Samaria or Shomeron; (see 1Ki 16:24); and this was fifty years after the death of Jeroboam.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 Kings 13:32
“Samaria - That is, of the kingdom of Samaria; as it was called, though not when this fact was done, yet before these books were written. Samaria was properly this name of one city, chap. xxi, 1, but from hence the whole kingdom of Israel was so called.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical
1 Kings 13:32
“He consults his own interest. It was foretold that men's bones should be burnt upon Jeroboam's altar: "Lay mine (says he) close to his, and then they will not be disturbed;" and it was, accordingly, their security, as we find, 2 Kings xxiii. Sleeping and waking, living and dying, it is safe being in good company.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
D.Jeroboam turned not from his evil wayvv. 33-34
Even after these events, Jeroboam did not repent of his evil ways, but again he appointed priests for the high places from every class of people. He ordained anyone who desired to be a priest of the high places. And this was the sin of the house of Jeroboam that led to its extermination and destruction from the face of the earth.
1 Kings 13:33-34
After a withered hand restored, an altar split by sign, and a fellow prophet struck dead for one broken command, Jeroboam returned not from his evil way. He goes on consecrating priests from whoever will take the office, no regard to lineage, and Wesley notes he did not abate so much as a circumstance of the worship the whole chapter has just answered with three separate signs. The chapter's last verse names the wages plainly: this thing became sin unto the house of Jeroboam, marked for its own cutting off.
The wording quoted in this note is the King James Version.
1 Kings 13:33, 2 voicesWhat preachers and commentators have said about these verses, in their own words.
1 Kings 13:33
“For you know undoubtedly that those that are by us named bishops, and presbyters, and deacons, were made by prayer, and by the laying on of hands; and that by the difference of their names is showed the difference of their employments. For not every one that will is ordained, as the case was in that spurious and counterfeit priesthood of the calves under Jeroboam; [1 Kings 13:33] but he only who is called of God. For if there were no rule or distinction of orders, it would suffice to perform all the offices under one name.”
Apostolic Constitutions· written before 380· Apostolic Constitutions (Book VIII), Section 5, XLVIpatristic
1 Kings 13:33
“Whosoever would, he consecrated him - i. e., he exercised no discretion, but allowed anyone to become a priest, without regard to birth, character, or social position. We may suspect from this that the office was not greatly sought, since no civil governor who cared to set up a priesthood would wish to degrade it in public estimation. Jeroboam did impose one limitation, which would have excluded the very poorest class. The candidate for consecration was obliged to make an offering consisting of one young bullock and seven rams 2Ch 13:9.”
1 Kings 13:34, 2 voices
1 Kings 13:34
“And this thing became sin unto the house of Jeroboam,.... All the above things were sins in themselves, as building high places, and putting priests in them, whoever would; but the sense is, that these were the causes of punishment, or of evil things being inflicted on Jeroboam's family; sin is put for the punishment of sin, as it often is: even to cut it off, and to destroy it from off the face of the earth; so that it become utterly extinct; and the next thing we hear of is the sickness and death of his son.”
1 Kings 13:34
“Note, The diminution, disquiet, and desolation of families, are the fruit of sin; he promised himself that the calves would secure the crown to his family, but it proved they lost it, and sunk his family. Those betray themselves that think by any sin to support themselves.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Where the chapter sits
1 Kings 13 falls in Divided kingdom and Elijah (chapters 13–22). The man of God from Judah; Ahijah's oracle to Jeroboam's wife; the parade of kings evaluated in formulaic regnal summaries. Elijah arrives in ch. 17 and dominates through Carmel (18), Horeb (19), Naboth's vineyard (21), and the LORD's word that stands against four hundred false prophets (22).
Before it: Division at Shechem, chapters 12.
The whole shape of 1 Kings→Key words
The Hebrew words this chapter turns on, by how often it uses them. Each one opens its word study.
| Word | What it means | Verses |
|---|---|---|
| אָמַרʼâmar20 times, as וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙, אָמַ֣ר, לֵאמֹ֔ר | to say | 2, 3, 4, 6 and 11 more |
| יְהֹוָהYᵉhôvâh18 times, as יְהוָ֖ה, יְהוָ֔ה, יְהוָ֑ה | yahweh | 1, 2, 3, 5 and 8 more |
| אֱלֹהִיםʼĕlôhîym17 times, as אֱלֹהִ֗ים, הָאֱלֹהִ֗ים, הָאֱלֹהִ֖ים | God | 1, 4, 5, 6 and 9 more |
| שׁוּבshûwb16 times, as לַהֲשִׁיבָ֥הּ, וְתָשֹׁ֥ב, וַתָּ֤שָׁב | to return | 4, 6, 9, 10 and 10 more |
| אִישׁʼîysh15 times, as אִ֣ישׁ, אִישׁ־, אִ֥ישׁ | man | 1, 4, 5, 6 and 9 more |
| דָּבָרdâbâr15 times, as בִּדְבַ֥ר, בִּדְבַ֣ר, דְּבַ֣ר | word | 1, 2, 4, 5 and 9 more |
Cross references
The 8 chapters this one speaks with, most first. Open a row for the verses it shares.
2 Kings 233 verses
1 Kings 13:2
2 Kings 23:15He even pulled down the altar at Bethel, the high place set up by Jeroboam son of Nebat, who had caused Israel to sin. Then he burned the high place, ground it to powder, and burned the Asherah pole.1 Kings 13:1, 31
2 Kings 23:17Then the king asked, “What is this monument I see?” And the men of the city replied, “It is the tomb of the man of God who came from Judah and pronounced these things that you have done to the altar of Bethel.”1 Kings 13:11
2 Kings 23:18“Let him rest,” said Josiah. “Do not let anyone disturb his bones.” So they left his bones undisturbed, along with those of the prophet who had come from Samaria.- Read 2 Kings 23 →
Numbers 233 verses
1 Kings 13:11
Numbers 23:4and God met with him. “I have set up seven altars,” Balaam said, “and on each altar I have offered a bull and a ram.”1 Kings 13:20
Numbers 23:5Then the LORD put a message in Balaam’s mouth, saying, “Return to Balak and give him this message.”1 Kings 13:20
Numbers 23:16And the LORD met with Balaam and put a message in his mouth, saying, “Return to Balak and speak what I tell you.”- Read Numbers 23 →
1 Kings 142 verses
1 Kings 13:34
1 Kings 14:10Because of all this, behold, I am bringing disaster on the house of Jeroboam: I will cut off from Jeroboam every male, both slave and free, in Israel; I will burn up the house of Jeroboam as one burns up dung until it is gone!1 Kings 13:22, 30
1 Kings 14:13All Israel will mourn for him and bury him. For this is the only one belonging to Jeroboam who will receive a proper burial, because only in him has the LORD, the God of Israel, found any good in the house of Jeroboam.- Read 1 Kings 14 →
1 Kings 122 verses
1 Kings 13:34
1 Kings 12:30And this thing became a sin; the people walked as far as Dan to worship before one of the calves.1 Kings 13:1
1 Kings 12:32And Jeroboam ordained a feast on the fifteenth day of the eighth month, like the feast that was in Judah, and he offered sacrifices on the altar; he made this offering in Bethel to sacrifice to the calves he had set up, and he installed priests in Bethel for the high places he had set up.- Read 1 Kings 12 →
The rest of the chapters this one speaks with, 4 of them, for a reader following a thread past the four above
- Jeremiah 222 verses
- Acts 82 verses
- Numbers 222 verses
- Matthew 72 verses
Cross-references from the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge and OpenBible.info.
The world behind itThe place, the time and the people around this chapter, for a reader who wants the setting.
The world behind this chapter
1 Kings 13The history
Bethel was chosen as the southern shrine of the new kingdom because it was an ancient holy place, this is where Jacob saw the ladder, and because it sat just north of the border, catching pilgrims before they reached Jerusalem. A king personally burning incense at the altar was the point of the ceremony being interrupted.
The prophet's message is delivered to the altar rather than the king, and it names a man three centuries early: Josiah, of the house of David, who will burn the bones of these priests here. Critics take a naming that precise as a sign the sentence was written in after Josiah did it; the traditional reading takes it as predictive prophecy, and notes that the narrative depends on the naming being remembered and passed down as the very thing that made the later fulfilment recognizable.
The sign given is immediate and physical. The altar splits and the ashes pour out, ash from burnt sacrifices accumulated in a heap and was carefully disposed of, so a split altar spilling them was the ruin of the whole installation. The king's hand withering when he points at the prophet, and being restored when he asks, are the two halves of a warning given in the same minute.
The command not to eat or drink in that place and not to return by the same road was itself a message. Refusing hospitality was a public verdict on a place, the way a modern envoy refuses to shake hands. That is why the old prophet's lie, an angel told me to bring you home, is so deadly: he persuades the man to cancel the sign he was sent to give. The lion that kills him and then stands by the body without touching the donkey marks the death as a judgment rather than an accident.
What it meant to them
The first hearers took away a hard rule: a word you were given directly is not overturned by someone claiming a newer word, even someone with a prophet's reputation.
They also heard the lying prophet ask to be buried in the same grave, because the word about Bethel would surely come to pass. Three hundred years later Josiah spared exactly that tomb.
Sources cited
- Keil & Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Books of Kings
- John H. Walton, Victor H. Matthews & Mark W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament
Where this chapter leads
On this page
The text of this chapter
This page carries no textual note on 1 Kings 13. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →
This page draws on 11 works. Open for the list.
This page draws on Adam Clarke; Albert Barnes; Ambrose of Milan, Concerning Virginity 2.5.38; Apostolic Constitutions, Apostolic Constitutions (Book VIII), Section 5, XLVI; Gregory the Dialogist, Dialogues, Book 4, Chapter 24; Ishodad of Merv, BOOKS OF SESSIONS 1 KINGS 13:11; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown; John Gill; John Wesley; Keil, The Books of the Kings and Matthew Henry.

