Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.
Daniel Interprets the Writing on the Wall

Danielchapter 5

31 verses · KJVDaniel book hub →

Daniel Interprets the Writing on the Wall, Gustave Doré, Doré's English Bible (1866), public domain

Key verse

Belshazzar the king made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand.

It stands in Belshazzar drinks from the temple vessels, verses 1 to 4.

The chapter

Chapter summary

Belshazzar makes a feast for a thousand of his lords and calls for the vessels taken from the house of God, and they drink from them while praising gods of gold and silver, brass, iron, wood and stone. Then the fingers of a man's hand write on the plaster of the wall, and the king's knees smite one against another. The queen remembers Daniel, who refuses the gifts and delivers the sharpest sermon in the book: you knew what happened to Nebuchadnezzar, yet 'the God in whose hand thy breath is… hast thou not glorified.' MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN, numbered, weighed and found wanting, divided to the Medes and Persians. 'In that night Belshazzar the Chaldean king was slain.'

Context

Prophecy · Daniel · Daniel overview

Where the chapter sits

Daniel 5 falls in Court narratives (chapters 1–6). The exile to Babylon; the king's dream of the statue (2); the fiery furnace (3); Nebuchadnezzar's madness and restoration (4); Belshazzar's feast (5); the lions' den (6).

Belshazzar's feast. The handwriting on the wall; Babylon falls that night.

After it: Apocalyptic visions, chapters 7–12.

The whole shape of Daniel

The world behind this chapter

Daniel 5
When
The Babylonian exile, the night the city fell · 12 October 539 BC, the night Babylon passed to the army of Cyrus the Persian
Where
The great hall of the palace in Babylon, a thousand nobles at a feast
Who first heard it
Exiles asking whether their God still ruled while a foreign king did

The history

For a long time Belshazzar was the book's embarrassment: no Babylonian king list had his name. Then cuneiform texts turned up naming Belshazzar as the son of Nabonidus, the last king of Babylon. Nabonidus spent about ten years away from the city at the desert oasis of Tema in Arabia, and left Belshazzar holding the kingship in Babylon.

The rest of the history, and what it meant to them

That solves the strangest detail in the chapter. Belshazzar offers Daniel the third place in the kingdom, not the second, because the first place was his absent father's and the second was already his own. It is a small thing that only makes sense if the writer knew how that court actually worked.

The Nabonidus Chronicle, a Babylonian tablet, records what happened outside. Cyrus's army beat the Babylonians at Opis, took Sippar without a fight, and then entered Babylon itself without a battle. Greek writers add the detail that the attackers lowered the Euphrates, which ran straight through the middle of the city, and walked in along the drained riverbed under the walls.

Those walls were the reason the party could happen at all. Babylon's defenses were famous enough that Herodotus devotes pages to them, and the city had grain stored for years. Belshazzar was not being reckless by feasting while an army camped nearby. He was being confident. The river was the one door nobody had bolted.

Drinking from the temple vessels taken out of Jerusalem was not just insult; in the ancient world, captured temple gear proved whose god had won. He was toasting his own gods with the trophies.

What it meant to them

For the exiles this was the answer to a question forty-seven years old. Jerusalem's holy vessels sat in Babylon's treasury as evidence that Babylon's gods had beaten Israel's God. On this night the God of those vessels wrote on the wall of the man holding them, and the empire was handed to somebody else before morning.

The verdict Daniel reads out is personal, not just political: "thou hast been weighed in the balances, and art found wanting." Belshazzar knew what had happened to Nebuchadnezzar and humbled himself anyway. The chapter says the God who patiently restored one king ended another in a night.

Sources cited

  • D. J. Wiseman, Chronicles of Chaldaean Kings (626–556 B.C.) in the British Museum
  • Herodotus, Histories (public domain)
  • Edwin Yamauchi, Persia and the Bible
  • K. A. Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament

Every work MannaFest builds on →

The structure of this chapter

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

A. Belshazzar drinks from the temple vesselsvv. 1-4

made a great feast: Belshazzar's feast opens the chapter on the same stage where Nebuchadnezzar's pride was broken one chapter earlier, and the bench reads the placement as deliberate: a son who had every reason to know what pride costs a king in this book chooses that same night to send for the temple vessels his grandfather took from Jerusalem. Wine before a thousand lords sets the scene as revelry rather than state business, and Gill and Barnes both note the vessels are drunk from precisely because they are sacred, an act of contempt aimed at the God of Israel rather than mere carelessness. The gods of gold, silver, brass, iron, wood and stone are praised in the same breath, idols that cannot see, hear, or know, which the chapter will use against Belshazzar directly at verse 23.

Daniel 5:1

Belshazzar - The grandson of Nebuchadnezzar. Made a great feast - After the manner of the eastern kings who shewed their magnificence this way. But this is prodigious that he should carouse when the city was besieged, and ready to be taken by Darius the Mede.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

2 more voices on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.

Daniel 5:1

Belshazzar the king - See Introduction to the chapter, Section II. In the Introduction to the chapter here referred to, I have stated what seemed to be necessary in order to illustrate the history of Belshazzar, so far as that can be now known. The statements in regard to this monarch, it is well understood, are exceedingly confused, and the task of reconciling them is now hopeless.

Daniel 5:1

Belshazzar was joint king with his father (called Minus in the inscriptions), but subordinate to him; hence the Babylonian account suppresses the facts which cast discredit on Babylon, namely, that Belshazzar shut himself up in that city and fell at its capture; while it records the surrender of the principal king in Borsippa (see my Introduction to Daniel).

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Daniel 5:2

While he tasted the wine, he commanded to bring the vessels of the temple, that they might drink in them. When he tasted how rich and fine the wine was, "O," said he, "it is a pity but we should have holy vessels to drink such delicious wine as this in," which was looked upon as a piece of wit, and, to carry on the humour, the vessels of the temple were immediately sent for.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

Daniel 5:2

BEROSUS makes Nabonidus, the last king, to have been one of the people, raised to the throne by an insurrection. As the inscriptions show that Belshazzar was distinct from, and joint king with, him, this is not at variance with Daniel, whose statement that Belshazzar was son (grandson) of Nebuchadnezzar is corroborated by Jeremiah (Jer 27:7).

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Daniel 5:4

Drunken worshippers, who are not men, but beasts, are the most proper for the service of dunghill deities, that are not gods, but devils. They have erred through wine, Isa. xxvii.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

B. Fingers writing on the plaster of the wall

1. (vv. 5-6)

Daniel 5:5

In the same hour - On the word “hour,” see the note at Dan 4:19. Came forth fingers of a man’s hand - Not the whole hand, but only the parts usually employed in writing. Not a man writing; not even an arm, but fingers that seemed to move themselves. They appeared to come forth from the walls, and were seen before they began to write. It was this that made it so impressive and alarming.

1 more voice on this verse

Daniel 5:5

It is significant, that on the same wall on which the king was accustomed to read the flattering legends of his own magnificence, he beholds the mysterious inscription which foretells his fall (compare Pr 16:18; Ac 12:21-23). part of the hand--the anterior part, namely, the fingers.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Daniel 5:6

The king’s countenance was changed - Here is a very natural description of fear and terror. 1. The face grows pale; 2. The mind becomes greatly agitated; 3. Pains seize on the lower part of the back and kidneys; 4. A universal tremor takes place, so that the knees smite against each other; 5. And lastly, either a syncope takes place, or the cry of distress is uttered, Dan 5:7: “The king cried.”

fingers of a man’s hand: The fingers of a man's hand appear with no body attached, writing over against the candlestick where the light makes the writing plain to every eye in the hall, and the commentators mark the staging as itself a rebuke: the very lamp Belshazzar lit for his feast becomes the lamp by which his sentence is read. The king's countenance changes, his thoughts trouble him, and his knees smite one another, a physical collapse the older writers read as conscience answering before any word is interpreted. Keil notes the terror is proportioned to guilt rather than to the mystery, since a hand alone, without a voice, ought to be less terrifying than what it plainly is to this king.

2. (vv. 7-9)

Daniel 5:7

He knew what these pretenders to wisdom aimed at, and what would please them, and therefore promised them a scarlet robe and a gold chain, glorious things in the eyes of those that know no better. Nay, he should be primus par regni--chief minister of state, the third ruler in the kingdom, next to the king and his heir apparent.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

Daniel 5:7

The world wishes to be deceived and shuts its eyes against the light [CALVIN]. The Hebrews think the words were Chaldee, but in the old Hebrew character (like that now in the Samaritan Pentateuch). third ruler--The first place was given to the king; the second, to the son of the king, or of the queen; the third, to the chief of the satraps.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Daniel 5:8

Then came in all the king’s wise men - The classes above referred to, Dan 5:7. But they could not read the writing - The character was an unknown character to them. It may have been a character which was not found in any language, and which made the power of Daniel to read it the more remarkable, or it may have been, as suggested in the notes at Dan 5:7, a foreign character with which they had no acquaintance, though familiar to Daniel.

Daniel 5:9

Then was king Belshazzar greatly troubled - Not doubting that this was a Divine intimation of some fearful event, and yet unable to understand its meaning. We are quite as likely to be troubled by what is merely “mysterious” in regard to the future - by anything that gives us some undefined foreboding - as we are by what is really formidable when we know what it is.

3 more voices on this verse

Daniel 5:9

Then was King Belshazzar greatly troubled,....

Daniel 5:9

And so while they were begging, the heart of the king was disturbed and his form was changed and his magistrates were troubled.

Hippolytus of Rome· written before 235· Commentary on Daniel 3.15.4patristic

Daniel 5:9

25 And this is the writing that was written, MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN. 26 This is the interpretation of the thing: MENE; God hath numbered thy kingdom, and finished it.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

the third ruler in the kingdom: The king's wise men are called for exactly as Nebuchadnezzar once called for his, and fail exactly as they once failed, the second such scene in the book and the second time Babylon's own experts cannot read what Babylon's own God has written. The promised reward, scarlet clothing, a gold chain, and the third ruler in the kingdom, has puzzled readers expecting first or second place, and the evidence lane answers it directly below rather than treating it as a slip of the pen. Verse 9 leaves the whole court astonied, the same word used of Nebuchadnezzar's counselors, tying this failure to the pattern the book has already established twice.

C. The queen remembers a man with the spirit of the holy gods

1. (vv. 10-12)

Daniel 5:10

The queen - came - This is generally allowed to have been the widow of Nebuchadnezzar; if so, she was the queen Amiyt, daughter of Astyages, sister of Darius the Mede, and aunt of Cyrus, according to Polyhistor, cited by Cedrenus. See Calmet. Others think that Nitocris was the person who is said to be queen when Cyrus took the city; and is stated to have been a lady of eminent wisdom and discretion, and to have had the chief direction of the public affairs.

Daniel 5:11

Yet what was the wisdom of them both compared with the treasures of wisdom hidden in Christ? (2.) He had an admirably good heart: An excellent spirit was found in him, which was a great ornament to his wisdom and knowledge, and qualified him to receive that gift; for God gives to a man that is good in his sight wisdom, and knowledge, and joy.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Daniel 5:12

Forasmuch as an excellent spirit - Not an excellent spirit in the sense in which that phrase is sometimes used now, as denoting a good and pious spirit, but a spirit or mind that excels; that is, that is “distinguished” for wisdom and knowledge. Interpreting of dreams - Margin, “or, of an interpreter.” This was regarded as a great attainment, and was supposed to prove that one who could do it was inspired by the gods. And showing of hard sentences - The meaning of enigmatical or obscure sentences.

the queen: who enters unsummoned is read by the bench as the queen mother, likely Nebuchadnezzar's own widow, since she remembers Daniel's service under the former king in detail Belshazzar's own generation had apparently forgotten or ignored. Her praise of Daniel, an excellent spirit, knowledge, understanding, and the interpreting of dreams, is offered as inherited memory rather than new information, which the bench reads as an indictment of a court that had let Daniel slip to the margins during Belshazzar's reign. She names him precisely, Daniel whom the king named Belteshazzar, closing the identification before Daniel is even sent for.

2. (vv. 13-16)

Daniel 5:13

He was now nearly ninety years of age, so that his years, and honours, and former preferments, might have entitled him to a free admission into the king's presence; yet he was willing to be conducted in, as a stranger, by the master of the ceremonies.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Daniel 5:14

And lest any one should perhaps think that, as the Scripture says, "God raised up the Holy Spirit of a young youth," the spirit in him was that of a person, not the Holy Spirit, let him read farther on, and he will find that Daniel received the Holy Spirit and therefore prophesied. Lastly, too, the king advanced him because he had the grace of the Spirit. For he speaks thus: "Daniel, you are able, forasmuch as the Holy Spirit of God is in you." And farther on it is written: "And Daniel was set over them, because an excellent Spirit was in him."

Ambrose of Milan· written before 397· On the Holy Spirit 3.6.43patristic

Daniel 5:16

Dissolve doubts - Untie knots - unbind what is bound. An expression used in the east to signify a judge of eminent wisdom and skill.

1 more voice on this verse

Daniel 5:16

But God so ordered it that they had nothing at all to say, as, when Christ was born, the heathen oracles were struck dumb. The interpretation which Daniel gave of these mystic characters, which was so far from easing the king of his fears that we may suppose it increased them rather.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

the children of the captivity of Judah: Belshazzar's first words to Daniel identify him by exile status before anything else, art thou that Daniel of the children of the captivity of Judah, a reminder the bench reads as unintentionally exposing the king's own contempt even as he asks for help. The offer repeats verse 7's reward word for word, scarlet, the chain, and third ruler, and Henry observes that Belshazzar still imagines Daniel can be bought, having learned nothing from what his own wise men's failure should have taught him about what kind of knowledge is actually on offer here. The repetition across the two summons keeps the reward question live for the chapter's evidence note at verse 29.

D. You knew all this and did not humble your heart

1. (v. 17)

Daniel 5:17

He slights the offer he made him of rewards, is not pleased that it was mentioned, for he is not one of those that divine for money; what gratuities Nebuchadnezzar gave him afterwards he gladly accepted, but he scorned to bargain for them, or to read the writing to the king for and in consideration of such and such honours promised him.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

Daniel 5:17

For here he declares his interpretation of the words is not from the desire of reward. The honors in Da 5:29 were doubtless urged on him, without his wish, in such a way that he could not with propriety refuse them. Had he refused them after announcing the doom of the kingdom, he might have been suspected of cowardice or treason.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Let thy gifts be to thyself: Daniel refuses the reward before he has even read the writing, let thy gifts be to thyself, and give thy rewards to another, a single verse the bench treats as the moral center of the whole scene: he will tell Belshazzar the truth whether or not it is rewarded, because the truth does not change with the fee. Gill contrasts this refusal with Daniel's earlier acceptance of honors under Nebuchadnezzar, reading the difference as circumstance rather than principle, since here the king's own doom is the message and no gift could soften what must be said. He still promises to read the writing and make known the interpretation, refusing payment, not the task.

2. (vv. 18-21)

Daniel 5:18

O thou king, the most high God gave Nebuchadnezzar thy father a kingdom ... - This reference to Nebuchadnezzar is evidently designed to show to Belshazzar the wickedness of his own course, and the reason which he had to apprehend the Divine vengeance, because he had not learned to avoid the sins which brought so great calamities upon his predecessor.

1 more voice on this verse

Daniel 5:18

God gave--It was not his own birth or talents which gave him the vast empire, as he thought. To make him unlearn his proud thought was the object of God's visitation on him. majesty--in the eyes of his subjects. glory--from his victories. honour--from the enlargement and decoration of the city.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Daniel 5:20

But when his heart was lifted up - See Dan 4:30. And his mind hardened in pride - Margin, “to deal proudly.” The state of mind indicated here is that in which there is no sense of dependence, but where one feels that he has all resources in himself, and need only look to himself. He was deposed from his kingly throne - Margin, “made to come down.” That is, he was so deposed by the providence of God, not by the acts of his own subjects.

the most high God gave Nebuchadnezzar: Before touching the writing Daniel retells the whole of chapter 4 to Belshazzar in miniature: the majesty God gave Nebuchadnezzar, the pride that lifted his heart, and the seven years among the beasts till he knew that the most high God ruled in the kingdom of men. Barnes reads this as Daniel forcing Belshazzar to hear the lesson his own family's history already taught, so that when judgment falls in this chapter it cannot be called unwarned or unprecedented. The phrase that most high God ruleth in the kingdom of men recurs from chapter 4 nearly word for word, binding the two chapters into one demonstration of the same truth to two different kings.

3. (vv. 22-23)

Daniel 5:22

And thou his son, O Belshazzar, hast not humbled thine heart ... - As thou shouldst have done in remembrance of these events. The idea is, that we ought to derive valuable lessons from what has taken place in past times; that, from the events which have occurred in history, we should learn what God approves and what he disapproves; that we should avoid the course which has subjected others to his displeasure, and which has brought his judgments upon them.

3 more voices on this verse

Daniel 5:22

And thou his son, O Belshazzar,....

Daniel 5:22

Hast not humbled thine heart - These judgments and mercies have had no good effect upon thee.

Daniel 5:22

Note, It is a great offence to God if our hearts be not humbled before him to comply both with his precepts and with his providences, humbled by repentance, obedience, and patience; nay, he expects from the greatest of men that their hearts should be humbled before him, by an acknowledgment that, great as they are, to him they are accountable.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

hast not humbled thine heart: Daniel turns from the grandfather's history to the grandson's guilt directly, thou his son, O Belshazzar, hast not humbled thine heart, though thou knewest all this, making plain that Belshazzar's sin is not ignorance but refusal to learn from a lesson he had every means of knowing. The charge against him is stated in full: lifting himself against the Lord of heaven, drinking from the temple vessels, and praising gods of silver, gold, brass, iron, wood and stone which see not, nor hear, nor know, set directly against the God in whose hand his very breath lies. Wesley and JFB both mark the closing clause, and whose are all thy ways hast thou not glorified, as the verdict's real center, since the charge is finally not the vessels but the refusal to honor the God who gives him life and rule.

4. (v. 24)

Daniel 5:24

Then was the part of the hand sent - This was the filling up of the cup of thy iniquity; this last act made thee ripe for destruction.

Daniel 5:24-25

the part of the hand sent: The writing itself is given in Aramaic weights and measures, MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN, terms Keil identifies as a mina, a mina, a shekel, and half-minas or divisions, ordinary units of commercial weighing turned into a sentence on a kingdom. The bench notes the words were likely legible to the wise men as vocabulary and unreadable only as meaning, which is why Daniel's contribution is interpretation rather than decipherment, reading a message hidden in plain words rather than in a foreign script.

E. Numbered, weighed, divided: and the city falls that night

1. (v. 25)

Daniel 5:25

And this is the writing that was written - The Babylonians, it would seem, were unacquainted with the “characters” that were used, and of course unable to understand the meaning. See Dan 5:8. The first thing, therefore, for Daniel to do was to read the writing, and this he was able to do without difficulty, probably, as already remarked, because it was in the ancient Hebrew character - a character quite familiar to him, though not known to the Babylonians, whom Belshazzar consulted.

2. (vv. 26-28)

Daniel 5:26

This is the interpretation of the thing - It may seem not to have been difficult to interpret the meaning of the communication, when one was able to read the words, or when the sense of the words was understood. But, if the words are placed together, and considered in their abstract form, the whole communication would be so enigmatical that the interpretation would not be likely to occur to anyone without a Divine guidance.

1 more voice on this verse

Daniel 5:26

MENE - MENE MENE, it is numbered, it is numbered; the words are doubled for the greater confirmation. It relates to the number of the seventy years for the overthrow of the Babylonish empire.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The whole record on this verse

Daniel 5:27

Tekel - This word (תקל teqēl) is also, according to Gesenius, a passive participle (from תקל teqal - “to poise, to weigh”), and means “weighed.” It would be used with reference to anything placed in a balance to ascertain its weight; and hence, like the word “measure,” would denote that the extent, dimensions, true worth, or character of anything was ascertained. As by the use of scales the weight of anything is known, so the word is applied to any estimate of character or of actions, and a balance becomes the emblem of justice.

1 more voice on this verse

Daniel 5:27

THERE IS A WEIGHING TIME for kings and emperors, and all the monarchs of earth, albeit some of them have exalted themselves to a position in which they appear to be irresponsible to man. Though they escape the scales on earth, they must surely be tried at the bar of God. For nations there is a weighing time. National sins demand national punishments.

The whole record on this verse

Daniel 5:28

Peres--the explanation of "dividers" (Da 5:25), the active participle plural there being used for the passive participle singular, "dividers" for "divided." The word "Peres" alludes to the similar word "Persia." divided--namely, among the Medes and Persians [MAURER]; or, "severed" from thee [GROTIUS].

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

1 more voice on this verse

Daniel 5:28

Peres - In Dan 5:25 this is “Upharsin.” These are but different forms of the same word - the word in Dan 5:25 being in the plural, and here in the singular. The verb (פרס peras) means, to “divide;” and in this form, as in the previous cases, it is, according to Gesenius, participle meaning “divided.” As it stands here, it would be applicable to anything that was “divided” or “sundered” - whether a kingdom, a palace, a house, territory, etc. “What” was divided could be known only by Divine revelation.

The whole record on this verse

God hath numbered thy kingdom: Daniel unpacks each word as a sentence on the kingdom itself: MENE, God has numbered Belshazzar's kingdom and finished it; TEKEL, he is weighed in the balances and found wanting; PERES, his kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians. Clarke reads the wordplay in the Aramaic root shared by peres and Persia as deliberate, the very name of the coming conqueror hidden inside the verdict word for division, so that the sentence names its own executor. The three words move from accounting to judgment to political consequence in a single breath, the fullest verdict any king receives in the book.

3. (v. 29)

Daniel 5:29

As the capture of the city by Cyrus was not till near daylight, there was no want of time in that eventful night for accomplishing all that is here recorded. The capture of the city so immediately after the prophecy of it (following Belshazzar's sacrilege), marked most emphatically to the whole world the connection between Babylon's sin and its punishment.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

the third ruler in the kingdom: Belshazzar keeps his word even under sentence of doom, clothing Daniel in scarlet and proclaiming him third ruler in the kingdom, and the evidence lane reads this promotion as the chapter's own explanation for a puzzle that troubled readers for centuries: the monuments recovered by nineteenth and twentieth century archaeology show Belshazzar as crown prince and co-regent under his father Nabonidus, who was away from Babylon and remained the kingdom's actual first ruler, which makes third the highest office Belshazzar himself had the standing to grant. The detail once alleged as evidence the book was late fiction is now read by the bench as a mark of genuine court knowledge.

4. (vv. 30-31)

Daniel 5:30

In that night was Belshazzar - slain - Xenophon says, he was dispatched by two lords, Gadatas and Gobrias, who went over to Cyrus, to avenge themselves of certain wrongs which Belshazzar had done them. We have already seen that Cyrus entered the city by the bed of the Euphrates, which he had emptied, by cutting a channel for the waters, and directing them into the marshy country.

1 more voice on this verse

Daniel 5:30

And it was foretold what a consternation it would be to the court, Jer. li. Note, Death comes as a snare upon those whose hearts are overcharged with surfeiting and drunkenness. The transferring of the kingdom into other hands.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

Daniel 5:31

And Darius the Median took the kingdom,.... This was Cyaxares the son of Astyages, and uncle of Cyrus; he is called the Median, to distinguish him from another Darius the Persian, that came after, Ezr 4:5, the same took the kingdom of Babylon from Cyrus who conquered it; he took it with his consent, being the senior prince and his uncle. Darius reigned not long, but two years; and not alone, but Cyrus with him, though he is only mentioned.

3 more voices on this verse

Daniel 5:31

And Darius the Median took the kingdom - The city and kingdom were actually taken by Cyrus, though acting in the name and by the authority of Darius, or Cyaxares, who was his uncle. For a full explanation of the conquests of Cyrus, and of the reason why the city is said to have been taken by Darius, see the notes at Isa 41:2. In regard to the question who Darius the Median was, see the Introduction to Daniel 6, section II.

Daniel 5:31

And so Darius, who was called Ahasuerus, received the kingdom and "appointed one-hundred-twenty satraps and appointed three governors over them, whom Daniel was one of, for the satraps to give account that the king may not be overburdened.

Hippolytus of Rome· written before 235· Commentary on Daniel 3.19.1-2patristic

Daniel 5:31

Darius the Median--that is, Cyaxares II, the son and successor of Astyages, 569-536 B.C. Though Koresh, or Cyrus, was leader of the assault, yet all was done in the name of Darius; therefore, he alone is mentioned here; but Da 6:28 shows Daniel was not ignorant of Cyrus' share in the capture of Babylon.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain: In that night was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain closes the sentence within hours of its writing, and Darius the Median took the kingdom at about sixty two years old, the fall of Babylon accomplished in the same feast that began the chapter. The bench treats Darius the Median's identity as an open historical question, most commonly read as a throne name for a governor set over Babylon under Cyrus rather than a separate independent monarch, a puzzle the book itself does not resolve and later chapters continue to use without further comment.

This page carries no textual note on Daniel 5. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes on the Book of Daniel; Carl Friedrich Keil, Biblical Commentary on the Book of Daniel; Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.

Keep studying