Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.
David Mourns the Death of Absalom

2 Samuelchapter 19

43 verses · Samuel, Nathan and Gad, by tradition · 10th century BC · History

Let thy servant, I pray thee, turn back again, that I may die in mine own city, and be buried by the grave of my father and of my mother. But behold thy servant Chimham; let him go over with my lord the king; and do to him what shall seem good unto thee.

Introduction

Samuel, Nathan and Gad, by tradition, History, 2 Samuel Overview.

This chapter follows a king back to his throne after the revolt has failed. The writer of 2 Samuel tells it for a people still arguing over which tribes had the greater claim on the house of David. Bringing a king home in that world was a slow negotiation, carried out through priests, elders and old debts. Several men meet the king at the Jordan, and each brings an account that has to be settled. Listen for which accounts David settles in full and which he settles by halves. Listen too for the quarrel at the end, because it names a division that later breaks the kingdom.

Context

Who
Israelites arguing over who had the greater claim on the returning king
What
An account of David's return from Mahanaim to the Jordan, the men who meet him there, and a quarrel between Judah and Israel.
Where
The gate of Mahanaim, the fords of the Jordan, and Gilgal.
When
About 978 BC, in the weeks after Absalom's death.
Why
To show a restoration that brings every unsettled matter back with the king, and the rift between north and south.

Historical context

Joab's rebuke is blunt because the situation is genuinely dangerous. An army that risked its life and comes home to find the king mourning the enemy will melt away by morning. The remedy is public and formal: the king must sit in the gate, where every returning soldier walking past sees him on the seat of judgment. Presence in the gate was how a ruler said the government is functioning.

Show the rest of the historical context, 3 more paragraphs

Bringing the king back is a political negotiation, not a parade. David works through the priests to get Judah's elders to move first, and offers Absalom's commander Amasa the top army post, replacing Joab, who had just killed his son and spoken to him like a servant. Rewarding the enemy's general was a standard way of buying a defeated faction, and it also solved a problem David could not solve directly.

Three men meet him at the river and each represents a different account to settle. Shimei arrives with a thousand Benjaminites, betting that numbers plus a fast apology beats the curse he shouted; Mephibosheth arrives with his beard untrimmed and his clothes unwashed since the day the king left, which is physical evidence against Ziba's story; and Barzillai, eighty years old, who had fed the army, refuses a place at court because he can no longer taste his food or hear the singers.

The quarrel at the end is the old fault line. Judah ferries the king across, and the northern tribes complain they were not invited, claiming ten shares in the king against Judah's one. Escorting a ruler over water was an honor with political weight, and the argument over it is exactly the argument that splits the kingdom two generations later.

Significance

The first hearers heard a restoration that was not clean. The king comes back, and every unresolved thing comes back with him, a liar rewarded, an accuser forgiven for now, a general demoted rather than tried.

Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph

The last verse is the warning: the men of Judah spoke more fiercely than the men of Israel. The war is over and the crack is already visible.

This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.

How it is read

The first note in the chapter is the one a Christian reader is least likely to expect. David says "my son" over Absalom, and Rashi counts the word eight times across the king's two laments. He reports a saying of the rabbis on that count, that seven of the eight lifted Absalom out of the seven levels of Gehinnom and the eighth brought him into the World to Come. He names the tractate Sotah for it (Rashi on II Samuel 19:1:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J., CC-BY). At the fifth verse he takes the covered face from the Targum and reads it as the manner of mourners (Rashi on II Samuel 19:5:1).

The return to Jerusalem draws mostly short glosses. At the eighth verse he supplies a missing word in Joab's warning (Rashi on II Samuel 19:8:1). At the ninth he says the fleeing Israel of the verse means the men who had been with Absalom (Rashi on II Samuel 19:9:1). At the tenth he reads the people as reproaching one another, and at the twelfth he marks how far the priests' message to the elders ran (Rashi on II Samuel 19:10:1 and 19:12:1). At the fourteenth he explains the offer to Amasa by the family tie, that Amasa was the son of David's own sister (Rashi on II Samuel 19:14:1). At the eighteenth and nineteenth he reads the crossing with rafts and a ferry boat (Rashi on II Samuel 19:18:1 and 19:19:1).

Two of the notes carry the political weight of the chapter. At the twenty-first verse Rashi puts Shimei's plea in the first person and gives its calculation. Shimei says that all Israel wronged the king and he most of all, and that if he is pardoned the rest will come back without fear (Rashi on II Samuel 19:21:1). At the twenty-third he reads the king's answer as a question and explains the change in him. While the curse stood, David took it as a sign that God had decreed the end of his kingdom. Shimei's regret told him that he was king after all (Rashi on II Samuel 19:23:1).

Malbim, Radak and Metzudat David carry the rest. The corpus holds thirteen of their refs with the reason that Sefaria holds no English version of them, so they stand cited and unquoted. They are Malbim on II Samuel 19:2:1, Radak on II Samuel 19:3:1, 19:7:1, 19:13:1, 19:15:1 and 19:22:1, and Metzudat David on II Samuel 19:4:1, 19:6:1, 19:11:1, 19:16:1, 19:17:1, 19:20:1 and 19:24:1.

What the rabbis say

The corpus carries forty rabbinic locators for this chapter and the text of none, so each is cited and linked here rather than quoted. The king's lament at the first verse draws four, Sotah 10b:15, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Sotah 1:31, Ein Yaakov, Sotah 1:37 and Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 53:10. That is the material behind Rashi's own note on the eight cries. The stolen victory of the third verse draws four more from one work, Bereshit Rabbah 11:1, 27:4, 32:7 and 100:7.

The crossing and the pardon of Shimei gather the next run. On the crossing at the eighteenth verse the corpus carries Bereshit Rabbah 86:4, Midrash Sekhel Tov, Bereshit 39:2:2, Midrash Tanchuma, Nasso 28:1 and Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Nasso 32:1. On the ferry it carries Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayetze 73. On Shimei's plea it carries Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Vayechi 44, Midrash Tehillim 3:3, Pesikta Rabbati 30:1 and Sifrei Aggadah on Esther, Midrash Panim Acherim, Version II 6:16. On the king's answer it carries the same Sifrei Aggadah at 2:4.

Mephibosheth and Barzillai fill the rest of the chapter. On Mephibosheth's unkempt state the corpus carries Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Shabbat 5:8, Ein Yaakov, Shabbat 5:13, Midrash Aggadah, Genesis 5:1:1, Midrash Lekach Tov, Deuteronomy 21:12:1 and Shabbat 56b:1. On his answer about the land it carries Midrash Lekach Tov, Deuteronomy 5:6:1 and Yalkut Shimoni on Torah 938:17. On the division of the field it carries Yoma 22b:16 with Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Yoma 2:3 and Ein Yaakov, Yoma 2:2. On Barzillai's age and his refusal it carries Midrash Shmuel 27:6, Midrash Tanchuma, Miketz 10:1 and Midrash Tehillim 79:1. On his hearing and his singers it carries Shabbat 152a:9, Jerusalem Talmud Bikkurim 2:1:7, Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Shabbat 23:7 and Ein Yaakov, Shabbat 23:10. Five more stand singly, Jerusalem Talmud Megillah 3:2:6, Jerusalem Talmud Sotah 1:4:3, Midrash Tehillim 59:1, Midrash Sekhel Tov, Bereshit 43:34:1 and Midrash Shmuel 14:6. What each of them teaches is a saying of the rabbis, and is reported as theirs wherever this site quotes one. The quotations wait on a fetch that carries the text.

Sources: Rashi, Rashi on II Samuel 19:1:1 to 19:23:1, the Metsudah Tanach series, Lakewood, N.J., CC-BY; Malbim, Malbim on II Samuel 19:2:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; Radak, Radak on II Samuel 19:3:1, 19:7:1, 19:13:1, 19:15:1 and 19:22:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; Metzudat David, Metzudat David on II Samuel 19:4:1, 19:6:1, 19:11:1, 19:16:1, 19:17:1, 19:20:1 and 19:24:1, cited by ref because the corpus carries no English text; The Babylonian Talmud, Sotah 10b:15, Shabbat 56b:1 and 152a:9, Yoma 22b:16, with Jerusalem Talmud Megillah 3:2:6, Sotah 1:4:3 and Bikkurim 2:1:7, cited by locator from the Sefaria corpus for 2 Samuel 19; The Midrash, Bereshit Rabbah 11:1, 27:4, 32:7, 86:4 and 100:7, Midrash Tehillim 3:3, 59:1 and 79:1, Pesikta Rabbati 30:1, Midrash Shmuel 14:6 and 27:6, and Pirkei DeRabbi Eliezer 53:10, cited by locator from the Sefaria corpus for 2 Samuel 19.

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

Joab's blunt rebuke: you love your enemies and hate your friends

2 Samuel 19:1-3

the king weepeth and mourneth for Absalom: David's grief turns Israel's victory into mourning, and the army that won the battle returns to the city by stealth, as men ashamed after a rout rather than men who had just put down a rebellion. The people's shame at their own king's grief is the ground Joab stands on in the verses that follow. Henry reads the moment as the greatest danger David faced to the loyalty of the men who had just saved his life.

2 Samuel 19:1

And it was told Joab,.... When returned to Mahanaim, or on his way to it; perhaps by the messengers he sent; and this report he had before he saw the king: behold, the king weepeth and mourneth for Absalom; for the death of him, instead of rejoicing at the victory obtained, and the deliverance from his enemies.

1 more voice on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.

2 Samuel 19:1

But when king David had suffered this injury at the hands of his impious and unnatural son, he not only bore with him in his mad passion but mourned over him in his death. He certainly was not caught in the meshes of carnal jealousy, seeing that it was not his own injuries but the sins of his son that moved him. For it was on this account he had given orders that his son should not be slain if he were conquered in battle, that he might have a place of repentance after he was subdued.

Augustine of Hippo · written before 430 · CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTION 3.21patristic

Word of David's grief spread through the army the same day. Matthew Henry draws the lesson that people watch what their rulers say and do, so the more eyes a man has on him, the more strictly he must govern his passions. Adam Clarke notes the people ended up mourning their own success.

2 Samuel 19:2

And the victory that day was turned into mourning unto all the people,.... They also mourned too, instead of expressing joy upon the occasion: for the people heard say that day how the king was grieved for his son; this report was spread among them, which damped their joy, and hindered them from giving any tokens of it, as were usual at such times.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:2

The victory - was turned into mourning - Instead of rejoicing that a most unnatural and ruinous rebellion had been quashed, the people mourned over their own success, because they saw their king so immoderately afflicted for the loss of his worthless son.

The troops came back to the city quietly, like people who steal away in humiliation after a battle lost. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown recall that a victorious army was usually met with music and rejoicing, as the women met Saul and David at 1 Samuel 18:6. Matthew Henry judges that David never needed his troops more.

2 Samuel 19:3

David never more needed the hearts of his subjects than now, nor was ever more concerned to secure his interest in their affections; and therefore whatever tended to disoblige them now was the most impolitic thing he could do, and the greatest wrong imaginable to his friends that adhered to him.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

O my son Absalom, O Absalom, my son, my son!: David covers his face and repeats his son's name, a lament pattern the older commentators call the plainest cry of grief in Scripture. He never speaks Absalom's name without the possessive my son, holding the office of father through the ruin the son made of himself and of the kingdom. Clarke and Henry both weigh the mourning as excessive given what Absalom had done, yet neither dismisses a father's loss as a small thing.

2 Samuel 19:4

The king covered his face - This was the custom of mourners. O my son Absalom - Calmet has properly remarked that the frequent repetition of the name of the defunct, is common in the language of lamentation. Thus Virgil, act. v., ver. 51: - - Daphnin que team tollemus ad astra; Daphnin ad astra feremus: amavit nos quoque Daphnis. “With yours, my song I cheerfully shall join, To raise your Daphnis to the powers Divine.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:4

"My servants have all come home safe, but where is my son? He is dead; and, dying in sin, I fear he is lost for ever. I cannot now say, I shall go to him, for my soul shall not be gathered with such sinners; what shall be done for thee, O Absalom! my son, my son! " 2.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Samuel 19:5-7

Thou hast shamed this day the faces of all thy servants: Joab's rebuke is blunt to the point of insolence, and the commentators say so plainly even while granting that the substance of it was right: the men who had just saved the king's life, his sons, his wives and his concubines, deserved better than to watch him mourn the man who tried to kill them all. His warning that not one man will stay with David that night if he does not go out to them is a threat as much as counsel, and it works within the verse. This is the last time in the chapter that Joab moves David by force of will rather than by office, before Amasa takes his place at verse 13.

2 Samuel 19:5

He speaks a great deal of reason, but not with the respect and deference which he owed to his prince. Is is fit to say to a king, Thou art wicked? A plain case may be fairly pleaded with those that are above us, and they may be reproved for what they do amiss, but it must not be done with rudeness and insolence.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:5

Had Absalom gained the victory, it is likely that, according to the manner of Oriental despots, he would have sought to secure his throne by killing all possible competitors Jdg 9:5; 1Ki 15:29.

The whole record on this verse

Joab's charge turns David's own cry at 18:33 against him, since a father who wished to die in his son's place seems to value the son above the army. Matthew Henry measures Joab's tone by Elihu's question at Job 34:18 about calling a king wicked. Henry grants the reason and faults the rudeness.

Joab swears by the LORD and could make it happen. The worst adversity of David's youth, the years hunted by Saul, would be outdone by an army melting away overnight. Matthew Henry allows a plain case to be pleaded to a superior, but without insolence.

the king arose, and sat in the gate: David does exactly what Joab told him, taking the seat in the public gate where a king heard his people and rendered judgment. Israel's army had already scattered to their own tents, each man going home once Absalom was dead rather than standing by a cause with no one left to lead it. Barnes reads David's obedience to Joab's rebuke as proof that he saw the justice of it despite the manner it was delivered in.

2 Samuel 19:8

Hither the people flocked to him to congratulate his and their safety, and all was well. Note, When we are convinced of a fault, we must amend, though we are told of it by our inferiors, and indecently, or in heat and passion.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:8

David saw the justice of what Joab said, and the new danger which threatened him if he did not rouse himself from his grief. For Israel ... - Not David’s followers, but as before 2Sa 17:26; 2Sa 18:6, 2Sa 18:17, Absalom’s army.

The whole record on this verse

Judah fetches the king back over Jordan

2 Samuel 19:9-10

The king saved us out of the hand of our enemies: The tribes argue among themselves over a king they had just driven out, and their own words indict the cause they followed: Absalom, whom we anointed over us, is dead in battle. That verb sits beside the true anointing named at 16:6, the Lord's anointed spoken over David while Saul still reigned, and sets a man-made anointing against the one God made and kept. Spurgeon preached the refrain bring the king back as a figure of the greater invitation still open to a king once rejected who returns in power.

2 Samuel 19:9

Let us therefore return to our allegiance, and think of bringing the king back." Perhaps this was all the strife among them, not a dispute whether the king should be brought back or no (all agreed it was to be done), but whose fault is was that it was not done. As is usual in such cases, every one justified himself and blamed his neighbour.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:9

It was the act of a skilful politician. Hebron having been the seat of the rebellion, it was graceful on his part to encourage their return to allegiance and duty; it was an appeal to their honor not to be the last of the tribes.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

John Gill reads the death of Absalom as a sign the revolt was never of God, which also freed the tribes from their oath to him. Matthew Henry thinks the quarrel among them was over blame. Each tribe accused its neighbour of delay.

2 Samuel 19:10

And Absalom, whom we anointed over us,.... To be king; which either was really done by Absalom's party, or in effect by proclaiming and appointing him king: is dead in battle; which shows the thing was not of God, and by which means they were released from their oath of allegiance to him: now therefore why speak ye not a word of bringing the king back? nobody speaks of it, gives the least hint of it, or shows any concern about it; but the greatest coldness and indifference, as if it was a matter of no importance.

2 Samuel 19:11-12

Speak unto the elders of Judah: David works through Zadok and Abiathar rather than approaching Judah directly, sending word that ties the elders' silence to shame, since Judah had joined the rebellion and now hesitates to be first in welcoming him back. He calls them my brethren, my bones and my flesh, the same kinship language he extends to Amasa in the next verse, offering forgiveness before anyone asks for it. Clarke reads the approach as calculated rather than naive, since David needed Jerusalem's own tribe secured before anything else could hold.

2 Samuel 19:11

Speak unto the elders of Judah - David was afraid to fall out with this tribe: they were in possession of Jerusalem, and this was a city of great importance to him. They had joined Absalom in his rebellion; and doubtless were now ashamed of their conduct. David appears to take no notice of their infidelity, but rather to place confidence in them, that their confidence in him might be naturally excited: and, to oblige them yet farther, purposes to make Amasa captain of the host in the place of Joab.

John Gill hears in the kinship words a promise of gentle treatment, since Judah had a hand in the conspiracy and feared punishment. Matthew Henry reads the question as an appeal to the rank of the royal tribe. Judah had crowned Absalom at Hebron.

2 Samuel 19:12

Ye are my brethren, ye are my bones and my flesh,.... Being of the same tribe, and therefore he should deal gently with them, as if they were parts of his body; and not be severe upon them, for the hand they had in the conspiracy, as they might fear: and wherefore then are ye the last to bring the king back? since they were so nearly related to him, and he so ready to forgive them.

captain of the host before me continually in the room of Joab: David swears Amasa into Joab's command outright, an oath sworn to the very man who led the army of the rebellion against him days before. Barnes reads it as evidence of how heavily Joab's independence weighed on David, the same weight behind 3:39's I am this day weak and 16:10's what have I to do with you. The promise holds only briefly; Joab kills Amasa within two chapters, one more death from the sword the prophet said would never leave David's house.

2 Samuel 19:13

Of my bone ... - Render as in preceding verse, “art thou not my bone and my flesh?” It is curious to note how the phrase is used in 2Sa 5:1 of common descent from Israel, in 2Sa 19:12 of the closer kindred of the tribe of Judah, and in this verse of the yet nearer kindred between David and Amasa his sister’s son. Captain ... in the room of Joab - It is very plain that David felt the weight of Joab’s overbearing influence to be very oppressive (compare 2Sa 19:22; 2Sa 3:39; 2Sa 16:10).

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:13

He owns him for his kinsman, and promises him that, if he will appear for him now, he will make him captain-general of all his forces in the room of Joab, will not only pardon him (which, it may be, Amasa questioned), but prefer him. Sometimes there is nothing lost in purchasing the friendship of one that has been an enemy.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

bowed the heart of all the men of Judah: The text credits David himself with bending the tribe's heart as one man, language usually kept for what only God does within a man. Judah answers within the same verse, sending back the word David wanted: return thou, and all thy servants. Clarke notes the strategy behind it, trusting men he had reason to distrust so that offered trust might draw trust back in return.

2 Samuel 19:14

And he bowed the heart of all the men of Judah - The measures that he pursued were the best calculated that could be to accomplish this salutary end. Appear to distrust those whom you have some reason to suspect, and you increase their caution and distrust. Put as much confidence in them as you safely can, and this will not fail to excite their confidence towards you.

2 Samuel 19:15-18

came to Gilgal, to go to meet the king: The crossing at Jordan draws a company from every side: a thousand men of Benjamin under Shimei, Ziba with his fifteen sons and twenty servants, and a ferry boat to carry the king's household over, the first mention of such a vessel anywhere in Scripture. Henry calls the crossing the most solemn since Joshua led Israel over the same river, and notes that David had already remembered Jordan from exile at Psalm 42:6. Two men who had wronged David in his flight, Shimei and Ziba, are both named here crossing to meet him now that he returns.

2 Samuel 19:15

Perhaps Jordan was never passed with so much solemnity, nor with so many remarkable occurrences, as it was now, since Israel passed it under Joshua. David, in his afflictive flight, remembered God particularly from the land of Jordan ( Ps. xlii. 6 ), and now that land, more than any other, was graced with the glories of his return.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Shimei begs, and lives another day

Albert Barnes thinks Shimei moved once he saw Judah unanimous for the king, and came with a Benjamite force to make his peace. Adam Clarke takes the thousand men as proof that he was a chieftain of weight. David could hardly strike such a man that day.

2 Samuel 19:16

Shimei the son of Gera - It appears that Shimei was a powerful chieftain in the land; for he had here, in his retinue, no less than a thousand men.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:16

Expressing the deepest regret for his former outrageous conduct, he was pardoned on the spot; and although the son of Zeruiah urged the expediency of making this chief a public example, his officiousness was repulsed by David with magnanimity, and with the greater confidence that he felt himself now re-established in the kingdom (see on 1Ki 2:8).

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Albert Barnes explains the geography. The king was still on the east bank, so these men forded the river from the west to meet him. Ziba comes with his whole household, the same fifteen sons and twenty servants named at 9:10, to secure the grant David made him at 16:4.

2 Samuel 19:17

Before the king - i. e., “to meet the king.” Compare 2Sa 20:8. The king was on the east bank, and they crossed over (by the ford) from the west bank to go to him.

The Hebrew word has been read as a ford, a ferry boat, or with Matthew Henry, a fleet or bridge of boats. Albert Barnes renders the timing as the moment David was about to cross, so Shimei's prostration takes place on the east bank. Henry notes that a public offence called for public submission.

2 Samuel 19:18

There went over a ferry-boat - This is the first mention of any thing of the kind. Some think a bridge or raft is what is here intended.

2 Samuel 19:19-20

Let not my lord impute iniquity unto me: Shimei names his own sin before anyone can accuse him of it again, come the first this day of all the house of Joseph to meet the king he had cursed at Bahurim. Clarke observes that confession was the only ground available to him, and only his conduct afterward could prove it sincere. The house of Joseph title marks him a leading man among the northern tribes, not merely a private grudge holder acting alone.

all the house of Joseph: Albert Barnes notes this is the first time the house of Joseph names all ten northern tribes, an odd title from a Benjamite. Coming first gave his submission the weight of the north. Matthew Henry notes his plain admission of sin, made before his own thousand men.

2 Samuel 19:20

For thy servant doth know that I have sinned - This was all he could do; his subsequent conduct alone could prove his sincerity. On such an avowal as this David could not but grant him his life.

2 Samuel 19:21-23

cursed the Lord’s anointed?: Abishai's demand invokes the same title David used to spare Saul twice, the Lord's anointed, but turns it toward vengeance rather than restraint, and it is not the first time a son of Zeruiah has pushed David further than he wanted to go. David's answer, what have I to do with you, ye sons of Zeruiah, matches his words at 16:10 almost exactly, and he swears the oath himself rather than let Abishai's logic decide it. Henry reads David's mercy that day as flowing from his own experience of God's mercy in restoring the kingdom his own sin had nearly cost him.

any man be put to death: David echoes Saul at 1 Samuel 11:13, who refused to put any man to death on the day his kingship was confirmed. Matthew Henry says joyful days should be forgiving days. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown add that David spoke as one aware that today he is king over Israel.

2 Samuel 19:22

The pleasantness of his spirit on this great occasion forbade the entrance of any thing that was sour and peevish: joyful days should be forgiving days. Yet this was not all; his experience of God's mercy in restoring him to his kingdom, his exclusion from which he attributed to his sin, inclined him to show mercy to Shimei. Those that are forgiven must forgive.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

John Gill limits the oath to David's own hand and to this offence, which leaves room for David's charge to Solomon at 1 Kings 2:8. John Wesley hears David reasoning from his own forgiveness. A pardoned king pardons.

2 Samuel 19:23

Therefore the king said unto Shimei, thou shalt not die,.... This day by my hands, or order, or by the sword, 1Ki 2:8, and the king sware unto him; that he should not die for that offence, or for that only; but if he committed a new one, this oath was no longer binding on him, and not at all upon his heir and successor.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:23

King - Is not my kingdom, which was in a manner wholly lost, just now restored and assured to me? And when God hath been so merciful to me in forgiving my sin, shall I shew myself revengeful to Shemei? Shall I sully the publick joy and glory of this day, with an act of such severity?

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Mephibosheth's unwashed feet and untrimmed beard

2 Samuel 19:24-25

had neither dressed his feet, nor trimmed his beard: Mephibosheth's unwashed feet, untrimmed beard and unwashed clothes since the day the king departed are a mourner's signs worn the whole length of David's exile, offered as evidence before he speaks a word in his own defense. Clarke reads the details as refuting Ziba's earlier report at 16:1-4 without David needing to ask a single question. David's first question still assumes Ziba's account was true, asking why Mephibosheth stayed behind rather than why he had mourned so long.

2 Samuel 19:24

Neither dressed his feet - He had given the fullest proof of his sincere attachment to David and his cause; and by what he had done, amply refuted the calumnies of his servant Ziba.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:24

Besides dyeing it black or red colors, which, however, is the exception, and not the rule in the East, there are various modes of trimming it: they train it into a massy, bushy form, swelling and round; or they terminate it like a pyramid, in a sharp point. Whatever the mode, it is always trimmed with the greatest care; and they usually carry a small comb for the purpose.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Mephibosheth met the king from Jerusalem, and David asked why he did not go with him. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that Eastern men trimmed the beard with great care, so his untrimmed mustache at verse 24 was plain to all. Matthew Henry notes that his answer turns at once to Ziba.

2 Samuel 19:26-28

my servant deceived me: Mephibosheth's account contradicts Ziba's directly: he had ordered an ass saddled to ride to David, lame as he was, and Ziba slandered him instead of doing as told. He calls David an angel of God able to judge between the two accounts and submits to whatever David decides, the same kindness of God David promised him at 9:3 now tested against a servant's word. Gregory the Dialogist read the episode centuries later as proof that even a man who usually carried the spirit of prophecy could still be deceived, since he remained a man.

2 Samuel 19:26

And he answered, my lord, O king, my servant deceived me,.... His servant Ziba, who, instead of saddling an ass for him by his order, went off with that and another himself, 2Sa 16:1; for thy servant said, I will saddle me an ass; he not only determined this in his own mind, but gave orders to his servant to saddle one for him: that I may ride thereon, and go to the king, because thy servant is lame; and could not walk afoot, being lame of both his feet, 2Sa 4:4.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:26

What appears to have happened is, that when Mephibosheth ordered Ziba to saddle the donkeys and ride with him to join David, Ziba left him under pretence of obeying, but instead laded the donkeys with provisions, and went off alone with them, thus making it impossible for Mephibosheth to follow.

Mephibosheth says Ziba has slandered him to the king. The woman of Tekoa used the same comparison with the angel of God at 14:17. Adam Clarke reads him as leaving his case to the king's own judgment, and Matthew Henry notes how much harm a wicked servant can do to the best of masters.

2 Samuel 19:27

The king is as an angel of God - As if he had said, I state my case plainly and without guile; thou art too wise not to penetrate the motives from which both myself and servant have acted. I shall make no appeal; with whatsoever thou determinest I shall rest contented.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:27

Why do you marvel, Peter? for the reason why we are deceived is, because we be men. What? have you forgotten how David, who usually had the spirit of prophecy, pronounced sentence against innocent Mephibosheth, the son of Jonathan, when he gave credit to the lying words of his servant Siba? Which thing notwithstanding because it was done by David, we both believe to be just in the secret judgment of God, and yet by human reason how it was just we cannot perceive.

Gregory the Dialogist · written before 604 · Dialogues, Book 1, Chapter 4patristic

The whole record on this verse

Mephibosheth owns that Saul's house had no claim on David at all, recalling the place at the table granted him at 9:7. Matthew Henry carries the picture to the gospel, where dead men are spared and seated at God's table. He sees no ground for complaint.

2 Samuel 19:28

Why should I think any thing hard that is put upon me when I hitherto been so kindly treated?" We were all as dead men before God; yet he has not only spared us, but taken us to sit at his table. How little reason then have we to complain of any trouble we are in, and how much reason to take all well that God does!

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

2 Samuel 19:29-30

Thou and Ziba divide the land: David cuts the dispute short rather than settling it, splitting the estate between two men whose stories cannot both be true. Barnes reads the division as David unwilling to make an enemy of Ziba while unable to disprove Mephibosheth, the same haste that marked his earlier sentence at 16:4. Mephibosheth answers by giving up his half outright, content that David has come home in peace, valuing the king's safety over the land Ziba had gained by lying.

2 Samuel 19:29

Unable to get to the bottom of the story, and perhaps unwilling to make an enemy of Ziba, David compromised the matter by dividing the land, thus partially revoking his hasty sentence 2Sa 16:4. We still see the impatient temper of David.

John Gill compares the answer to Solomon's test at 1 Kings 3:26, where the true mother gave up her claim to save the child. Mephibosheth's surrender marks him as the loyal one. His joy is in the king's return.

2 Samuel 19:30

And Mephibosheth said unto the king, yea, let him take all,.... The whole estate, as David had given it to him; he was content that that last grant should stand: forasmuch as my lord the king is come again in peace unto his own house; his palace in Jerusalem; which was a strong expression of affection for him, and loyalty to him. (Solomn used a similar test to determine which woman's baby was alive. 1Ki 3:16. He purposed the baby be cut in two to reveal who the real mother was.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:30

34 And Barzillai said unto the king, How long have I to live, that I should go up with the king unto Jerusalem? 35 I am this day fourscore years old: and can I discern between good and evil? can thy servant taste what I eat or what I drink? can I hear any more the voice of singing men and singing women? wherefore then should thy servant be yet a burden unto my lord the king?

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Barzillai at eighty sends Chimham in his place

2 Samuel 19:31-33

came down from Rogelim: Barzillai crosses Jordan with David after supplying him through the hardest stretch of the exile at Mahanaim, and David offers to bring him to Jerusalem and feed him at his own table in return. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that no reward to Barzillai himself is ever recorded, though David's kindness to his son Chimham a few verses later stands in its place. Clarke calls the eighty-year-old's loyalty beyond suspicion, since a man that age has nothing left to gain by flattering a king.

2 Samuel 19:31

And Barzillai the Gileadite came down from Rogelim,.... The place of his habitation, to Jordan, see 2Sa 17:27, and went over Jordan with the king to conduct him over Jordan; to accompany him over the river, and then take his leave of him.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:31

His declining to go to court, his recommendation of his son, his convoy across the Jordan, and his parting scene with the king, are interesting incidents. What mark of royal favor was bestowed on Chimham has not been recorded; but it is probable that David gave a great part of his personal patrimony in Beth-lehem to Chimham and his heirs in perpetuity (Jer 41:17).

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

Matthew Henry notes that Barzillai had a large heart to match his large estate. The provision at 17:27 came when David's cause looked lost. Henry asks what else such wealth is good for.

2 Samuel 19:32

Barzillai was a very aged man - This venerable person had given full proof of his attachment to David by the supplies he had given him when he lay at Mahanaim, where his case was all but desperate; the sincerity of his congratulations now none can suspect. David’s offer to him was at once noble and liberal: he wished to compensate such a man, and he wished to have at hand such a friend.

John Gill sees the offer as a return in kind. Barzillai fed the king at Mahanaim, and David will feed him at his own table in Jerusalem. Matthew Henry thinks David also wanted the old man's company and counsel.

2 Samuel 19:33

And the king said to Barzillai, come thou over with me,.... Over Jordan; Barzillai came with an intent to accompany the king over Jordan; but the king meant not only to go over Jordan, but when over to go further with him, even to Jerusalem: and I will feed thee with me in Jerusalem; meaning, that he should dwell with him in his palace, and eat at his table, in return for feeding him at Mahanaim.

2 Samuel 19:34-37

How long have I to live, that I should go up with the king: Barzillai declines the king's offer on the ground of age alone, fourscore years old and past discerning good from evil, unable to taste what he eats or hear the singers who would perform at court. Henry reads his speech as a pattern for old age generally, dead to the delights of sense that once moved him, asking only to die in his own city and be buried by his father's grave. He asks nothing for himself and everything for Chimham, who goes over with the king in his place.

At eighty, Barzillai says he can no longer enjoy the singing men and women. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that singers were a regular part of an Eastern court, and Adam Clarke reads the verse as a picture of court life and of old age. John Wesley says his senses had grown dull.

2 Samuel 19:35

Can thy servant taste what I eat - Here is at once an affecting description of the infirmities of old age; and a correct account of the mode of living at an Eastern court in ancient times. Barzillai was fourscore years old; his ear was become dull of hearing, and his relish for his food was gone: he therefore appears to have been not only an old man, but an infirm old man.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:35

Dainties are insipid when desire fails, and songs to the aged ear are little better than those sung to a heavy heart, very disagreeable: how should they be otherwise when the daughters of music are brought low? Let those that are old learn of Barzillai to be dead to the delights of sense; let grace second nature, and make a virtue of the necessity.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

Barzillai calls his great provision a small service, only going with the king a short distance past the Jordan. Matthew Henry sets this beside the saints at the judgment, amazed at the reward given for what they did, as at Matthew 25:37. John Gill hears plain duty in it.

2 Samuel 19:36

Will the master thank that servant who only does what was his duty to do? He though he had done himself honour enough in doing the king any service. Thus, when the saints shall be called to inherit the kingdom in consideration of what they have done for Christ in this world, they will be amazed at the disproportion between the service and the recompence.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note the strong attachment of Eastern families to their own burial places. John Wesley has him going home to die in his nest. Adam Clarke takes Chimham for Barzillai's son, which fits David's dying charge at 1 Kings 2:7 to show kindness to Barzillai's sons.

2 Samuel 19:37

He desires the king to be kind to his son Chimham: Let him go over with my lord the king, and have preferment at court. What favour is done to him Barzillai will take as done to himself. Those that are old must not grudge young people those delights which they themselves are past the enjoyment of, nor confine them to their retirements.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:37

Chimham - From marginal references it appears that Chimham, having accepted David’s offer, came and settled near Bethlehem. His house was still called after him at the time of the captivity.

The whole record on this verse

2 Samuel 19:38-39

Chimham shall go over with me: David grants Barzillai's request in full, taking Chimham in his father's place and promising to do for him whatever Barzillai asks. Barnes notes that Chimham's household is still remembered by name generations later at Jeremiah 41:17, settled near Bethlehem on land that may have come from David's own inheritance. The parting itself is warm rather than formal, a kiss and a blessing before Barzillai turns back toward Rogelim.

2 Samuel 19:38

And the king answered, Chimham shall go over with me,.... He admitted of him instead of his father: and I will do unto him that which shall seem good unto thee; he puts it to Barzillai, and leaves it with him to ask what he would for his son, and he would grant it.

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:38

And, it should seem, Barzillai, who had experienced the innocency and safety of retirement, begged a country seat for him near Jerusalem, but not in it; for, long after, we read of a place near Beth-lehem, David's city, which is called the habitation of Chimham, allotted to him, probably, not out of the crown-lands or the forfeited estates, but out of David's paternal estate.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

kissed Barzillai, and blessed him: Albert Barnes notes that the people in this narrative are David's own followers, who crossed by the ford while the royal household came over by boat. Adam Clarke takes the blessing as a prayer for Barzillai's prosperity, which may have been prophetic. He then went home to Rogelim.

2 Samuel 19:39

The “people” is the term especially applied in this narrative to David’s followers 2Sa 15:17; 2Sa 16:14; 2Sa 17:2; 2Sa 18:1-2; 2Sa 19:2-3. They crossed by the ford, while David and his household, accompanied by Barzillai and Chimham, came over in the ferry.

Ten parts in the king: the quarrel at Gilgal

2 Samuel 19:40-43

Then the king went on to Gilgal: Judah escorts David across on the strength of nearest kinship, but Israel arrives asking why their brethren stole the king away without them, claiming ten parts in the king by tribal count against Judah's one. Judah answers that they gained nothing personally by it, only loyalty, yet the men of Judah spoke fiercer words than Israel did in reply. Henry reads the quarrel as the seed of the division that breaks open in the next chapter, since a people already arguing over who loves the king more is a people not far from arguing over who follows him at all.

2 Samuel 19:40

Judah grounded their right to take the lead, on the ground of their nearer relationship to the king. This was a claim dangerous to the house of David; and it shows the seeds were already sown for that tribal dissension which, before long, led to the dismemberment of the kingdom.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

Israel charges Judah with taking the king away secretly. Albert Barnes places the scene at Gilgal, where David's company halted after crossing the Jordan, and where Saul's kingdom had once been renewed at 1 Samuel 11:14. John Wesley reads the charge as haste that left the other tribes behind, with all of David's men.

2 Samuel 19:41

Stolen - That is, conveyed thee over Jordan hastily, not expecting our concurrence. David's men - All thy officers, guards, and soldiers. This is mentioned as an aggravation of their fault, that they did not only carry the king over Jordan, but all his men too, without asking their advice.

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:41

It seems that David and his whole party made a halt at Gilgal 2Sa 19:15; 1Sa 11:14, and possibly made some solemn agreement there about the kingdom. But while they were there, “all the men of Israel,” representatives from the tribes not included in “half the people of Israel” 2Sa 19:40, came up in great wrath at finding that the restoration had been accomplished without consulting them, and accused the men of Judah of unfair dealing.

Matthew Henry has Judah treating the escort as a matter of ceremony, claimed by kinship and by the king's return into their own country. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown judge the kinship claim dangerous to David's house. It gave the other tribes a ground for exclusion.

2 Samuel 19:42

Wherefore then be ye angry for this matter? - We have not done this for our own advantage; we have gained nothing by it; we did it through loyal attachment to our king.

John Wesley has Israel adding that Judah began the rebellion, since Absalom was crowned at Hebron. Matthew Henry counts Judah's share as its own tribe with Simeon inside it, and remarks how changeable a crowd is. Adam Clarke reads fiercer words as weightier ones.

2 Samuel 19:43

They pleaded, " We have ten parts in the king " (Judah having Simeon only, whose lot lay within his, to join with him), "and therefore it is a slight upon us that our advice was not asked about bringing back the king. " See how uncertain the multitude is.

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

2 Samuel 19:43

More right - As in the general we have more right in the king and kingdom; so particularly, we have more right in David than you, because you were the first beginners, and the most zealous promoters of this rebellion; howsoever, as he is king, we justly claim a greater interest in him, than you; inasmuch as we are the far greatest part of his subjects.

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The whole record on this verse

How this psalm is built

The form: Narrative, a homecoming told as a sequence of meetings, each one a debt to be settled, as Samuel classes it.

The patterns in this chapter

The devices this chapter is built on, what each one does, and one verse where it stands.
DeviceWhat it doesWhere to see it
The call to bring the king backThe phrase runs through the middle of the chapter and moves the action along. The tribes say it among themselves at verses 9 and 10. David sends it to the elders of Judah at verse 11 and asks why they should be last to bring the king back to his house. It returns in the quarrel at verse 43. Charles Spurgeon preached the refrain as a figure of the invitation still open to a king once rejected who returns in power.Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, the sermon "Bringing the King Back", as the published exposition of this chapter reports it.2 Samuel 19:10, 2 Samuel 19:11, 2 Samuel 19:12, 2 Samuel 19:43
The men who come down to the ford, counted as they comeVerses 16 to 40 bring one company after another to the Jordan, and each is numbered or named as it arrives. A thousand men of Benjamin come with Shimei. Ziba comes with his fifteen sons and twenty servants. Mephibosheth comes with his feet undressed and his beard untrimmed. Barzillai comes down from Rogelim at eighty years old. The published exposition notes that the ferry boat sent over for the king's household is the first mention of such a vessel anywhere in Scripture.Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, on 2 Samuel 19:15 to 18, as the published exposition of this chapter reports him.2 Samuel 19:16, 2 Samuel 19:17, 2 Samuel 19:18, 2 Samuel 19:24, 2 Samuel 19:31
Two accounts of the same journey that cannot both be trueZiba told David at 16:1 to 4 that Mephibosheth had stayed in Jerusalem hoping for the kingdom. Mephibosheth says at verses 26 and 27 that he ordered an ass saddled so that he could ride to David, lame as he was. He adds that Ziba slandered him instead of doing as he was told. The chapter sets the two statements against each other and lets the reader weigh them. Adam Clarke reads the mourner's signs of verse 24 as refuting Ziba's report without David needing to ask a question.Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, on 2 Samuel 19:24 to 25, as the published exposition of this chapter reports him.2 Samuel 19:24, 2 Samuel 19:26, 2 Samuel 19:27, 2 Samuel 19:29
The rebuke that moves a king by force of willJoab's speech at verses 5 to 7 is blunt to the point of insolence, and the commentators say so while granting that its substance was right. The men who had just saved the king's life, his sons, his wives and his household, deserved better than to watch him mourn the man who tried to kill them all. His warning that not one man will stay with David that night is a threat as much as counsel, and it works inside the verse. David rises and sits in the gate at verse 8.Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, on 2 Samuel 19:5 to 7, as the published exposition of this chapter reports them.2 Samuel 19:5, 2 Samuel 19:7, 2 Samuel 19:8

The debated reading

10 more paragraphs on the patterns

The chapter carries one question that has been argued since the earliest commentary on it, and the text declines to settle it. Ziba and Mephibosheth give accounts of the same days that cannot both be true.

Adam Clarke holds that the mourner's signs at verse 24 refute Ziba's earlier report on their own, since a man hoping for a crown does not spend the weeks unwashed. Albert Barnes reads David's ruling at verse 29 as the act of a king unwilling to make an enemy of Ziba while unable to disprove Mephibosheth. He sets it beside the same haste in the earlier sentence at 16:4. Both positions are named here and neither is decided, because the narrative itself does not decide.

What the chapter does record is what Mephibosheth then does. He gives up his half of the estate outright, content that the king has come home in peace. Gregory the Dialogist read the episode centuries later as evidence that a man who usually carried the spirit of prophecy could still be deceived, since he remained a man.

A second, smaller question stands at verses 1 to 4. Adam Clarke and Matthew Henry both weigh the mourning as excessive given what Absalom had done. Neither dismisses a father's loss as a small thing, and the published exposition of this chapter keeps both halves of that judgment.

The historical value

Three details in the chapter reach outside it. The ferry boat at verse 18 is the first mention of such a vessel anywhere in Scripture. Chimham is taken over Jordan in his father's place at verses 37 to 40. His household is still remembered by name generations later at Jeremiah 41:17, settled near Bethlehem on land that may have come from David's own inheritance. Albert Barnes records that link.

The third is the quarrel itself. Matthew Henry reads the argument at verses 40 to 43 as the seed of the division that breaks open in the next chapter under Sheba. The same seed runs on into the division of the kingdom after Solomon. The ten parts Israel claims here are the ten tribes that walk away at 1 Kings 12.

The divine connection

The tribes indict their own cause in their own words at verse 10, saying that Absalom, whom they anointed over them, is dead in battle. The published exposition sets that man-made anointing against the true one, the LORD's anointed, a title spoken over David while Saul still reigned.

David's mercy to Shimei at verses 21 to 23 turns on the same title. Abishai demands death because Shimei cursed the LORD's anointed. David answers him with the words he used at 16:10, asking what he has to do with the sons of Zeruiah, and swears the oath himself rather than let Abishai's logic decide it. Matthew Henry reads that mercy as flowing from David's own experience of God's mercy, in a kingdom restored to him that his own sin had nearly cost him.

Keep studying

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The form and classifications

Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, the sermon "Bringing the King Back", as the published exposition of this chapter reports it; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, on 2 Samuel 19:40 to 43, as the published exposition of this chapter reports him and This site's published guide to 2 Samuel, src/components/book/guides/2-samuel/Book2SamuelGuide.tsx, act II, the beat for chapter 19, "Return, and Sheba's revolt", with the note "The kingdom reknit: barely".

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Bringing the King Back; Gregory the Dialogist, Dialogues; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.