Genesis 2:23
in Genesis 2And the man said: “This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called ‘woman,’ for out of man she was taken.”
BSB
The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾
ASV
And the man said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
KJV
And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
⋯
This verse in Genesis 2
Commentary
22 notes on this verse(Verse 23.) Now this is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. It does not seem to sound in Greek and Latin why she is called Woman, because she was taken out of Man; but the etymology is preserved in the Hebrew language. For Man is called 'Is', and Woman is called 'Issa'. Therefore, she was rightly called Woman from Man.
This site's exposition
bone of my bones
Adam's first recorded words are poetry. He calls her bone of my bones, and the name he gives, ishshah from ish, plays on his own name, which English keeps as woman from man. Jerome noted the play holds in Hebrew and is lost in Greek and Latin.
The record, by era
The Church Fathers5 voices
Having spoken of the stillness, the extracted rib and the woman fashioned out of it who had been brought to him, Scripture describes how Adam said, "This time it is bone from my bone and flesh from my flesh; let her be called woman, for …
"This now"—that is, the one who has come to me after the animals—is not such as they; they came from the earth, but she is "bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh."
He experienced the influence of the Spirit. For there fell upon him that ecstasy, which is the Holy Ghost's operative virtue of prophecy. But this (gift of prophecy) only came on him afterwards, when God infused into him the ecstasy, or spiritual quality, in which prophecy consists.
God gave to Eve, when she had not yet known a man, the surname "woman" and "female"—("female," whereby the sex generally; "woman," hereby a class of the sex, is marked). So, since at that time the as yet unwedded Eve was called by the word "woman," that word has been made common even to a virgin. Nor is it wonderful that the apostle—guided, of course, by the same Spirit by whom, as all the divine Scripture, so that book Genesis, was drawn up—has used the selfsame word in writing "women," which, by the example of Eve unwedded, is applicable too to a "virgin."
God moreover made the woman from the man's side, because the two sides bind the whole body close together; for he neither made her from the front of man lest the woman should exalt herself above him, nor from his back parts that he might …
15 more voices on this verse
The Church Fathers7 voices
Of whom in the beginning was Eve begotten? What mother conceived her, the motherless? But the Scripture says that she was born out of Adam's side. Is Eve then born out of man's side without a mother, and is a child not to be born without a father, of a virgin's womb? This debt of gratitude was due to men from womankind: for Eve was begotten of Adam and not conceived of a mother, but as it were brought forth of man alone.
A commentator
John ChrysostomCommentary (church-history corpus) · Written in the 5th century.
proposed
"He led her to Adam," the text says, remember. "Now there is someone, bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh." [ Gen 2:23 ] Notice here, I ask you, dearly beloved, how along with this ineffable intelligence bestowed on him by God, which he demonstrated to us by the imposition of names he gave to all those species of brute beasts, he was endowed also with the prophetic grace. I mean, the reason why this blessed author taught us in the preceding passages that Adam was overcome by drowsiness and sleep so as to have no sense at all of what happened was that when you come to know that on seeing the woman he describes her creation precisely, you may have no doubt that he is saying this under the influence of the prophetic grace and the inspiration of instruction by the Holy Spirit. You see, when God led her to him, he said, without knowledge of anything that had happened, "Now there is someone bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh." Yet some other translator renders it "This once" instead of "Now", to indicate that this happened only on this occasion, and there will be no repetition of the formation of woman. Now, it is saying, woman has been made from man whereas later it will not be like this; instead, man will come from woman or rather, not from woman but from the cooperation of the two, as Paul also says, "Man is not from woman, but woman from man; and man was not created for woman, but woman for man." [ I Cor 11:8-9 ] True, he is saying, but these words indicate that woman was made from man. Still, wait a while and you will see his precise teaching in what follows. He goes on, in fact: "Yet man is not independent of woman nor woman of man," teaching us that in the course of things the human being's composition will derive from both man and woman through their intercourse.
When this kind of second human being was made by God for man's assistance, that female was forthwith named woman; still happy, still worthy of paradise, still virgin.
The apostle Paul testifies that this passage has both a plain and an allegorical meaning. Discussing it in his letter to the Ephesians, he asserts, "This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church."
Adam had already recognised the flesh which was in the woman as the propagation of his own substance ("This is now bone of my bone, and flesh of my flesh" Genesis 2:23 ), and the very taking of the woman out of the man was supplemented with flesh; but it ought, I should suppose, to have been made good with clay, if Adam was still clay. The clay, therefore, was obliterated and absorbed into flesh. When did this happen? At the time that man became a living soul by the inbreathing of God—by the breath indeed which was capable of hardening clay into another substance, as into some earthenware, so now into flesh. In the same way the potter, too, has it in his power, by tempering the blast of his fire, to modify his clayey material into a stiffer one, and to mould one form after another more beautiful than the original substance, and now possessing both a kind and name of its own.
A commentator
Clement of RomeClement's First Letter to the Corinthians, Chapter 6 · Written before 99.
proposed
To these men who spent their lives in the practice of holiness, there is to be added a great multitude of the elect, who, having through envy endured many indignities and tortures, furnished us with a most excellent example. Through envy, those women, the Danaids and Dircae, being persecuted, after they had suffered terrible and unspeakable torments, finished the course of their faith with stedfastness, and though weak in body, received a noble reward. Envy has alienated wives from their husbands, and changed that saying of our father Adam, "This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh." [Genesis 2:23] Envy and strife have overthrown great cities and rooted up mighty nations.
A commentator
Augustine of HippoON THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF GENESIS 9.19.36 · Written in the 5th century.
proposed
Hence we are justified in concluding that the ecstasy in which Adam was caught up when God cast him into a sleep was given to him so that his mind in that state might participate with the host of angels and, entering into the sanctuary of God, understand what was finally to come. When he awoke, he was like one filled with the spirit of prophecy, and seeing his wife brought before him, he immediately opened his mouth and proclaimed the great mystery that St. Paul teaches: "This now is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called woman, because she has been taken out of man. And for this reason a man shall leave his father and his mother and shall cleave to his wife; and they shall be the two in one flesh." These were the words of the first man according to the testimony of Scripture, but in the Gospel our Lord declared that God spoke them. For he says, "Have you not read that he who made them from the beginning made them male and female and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and shall cleave to his wife, and they shall be two in one flesh' "? From this we should understand, therefore, that because of the ecstasy that Adam had just experienced he was able to say this as a prophet under divine guidance.
The Medieval Church3 voices
"This, he said, will be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. And as the Latin etymology agrees in these names, since Woman is named from Man, so it also agrees in Hebrew, in which language man is called 'ish', and from this …
A commentator
BonaventureCollationes de Septem Donis, Collation 6 · Written in the 13th century.
proposed
Adam said that she was "woman, because she was taken from man. This," he said, "is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh." And why, while he slept, did He take one of his ribs?
A commentator
BonaventureDisputed Questions on Evangelical Perfection, Question 3 · Written in the 13th century.
proposed
Conjugal chastity accords with the law of nature by reason of the revelation shown from above. For Adam prophetically said after his deep sleep: This now is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh.
The Puritans and the Awakening3 voices
(2.) The commencement of the kingdom of grace, in the sanctification of the sabbath day, ver. 3. He rested on that day, and took a complacency in his creatures, and then sanctified it, and appointed us on that day to rest and take a complacency in the Creator; and his rest is in the fourth commandment made a reason for ours after six days labour.
quarantine:anchor (2026-07-29) — cites-ver-3-anchored-18-25
And Adam said, this is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh,....
Probably it was revealed to Adam in a vision, when he was asleep, that this lovely creature, now presented to him, was a piece of himself, and was to be his companion and the wife of his covenant.
The Nineteenth Century2 voices
A commentator
Albert Barnes1798–1870
Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869)
Whether the primeval man was conscious of the change in himself, and of the work of the Supreme Being while it was going on, or received supernatural information of the event when he awoke, does not appear. But he is perfectly aware of the nature of her who now for the first time appears before his eyes.
Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, etc. - There is a very delicate and expressive meaning in the original which does not appear in our version. When the different genera of creatures were brought to Adam, that he might assign them their proper names, it is probable that they passed in pairs before him, and as they passed received their names. To this circumstance the words in this place seem to refer. Instead of this now is זאת הפאם zoth happaam, we should render more literally this turn, this creature, which now passes or appears before me, is flesh of my flesh, etc. The creatures that had passed already before him were not suitable to him, and therefore it was said, For Adam there was not a help meet found, Gen 2:20; but when the woman came, formed out of himself, he felt all that attraction which consanguinity could produce, and at the same time saw that she was in her person and in her mind every way suitable to be his companion. See Parkhurst, sub voce. She shall be called Woman - A literal version of the Hebrew would appear strange, and yet a literal version is the only proper one. איש ish signifies man, and the word used to express what we term woman is the same with a feminine termination, אשה ishshah, and literally means she-man. Most of the ancient versions have felt the force of the term, and have endeavored to express it as literally as possible. The intelligent reader will not regret to see some of them here. The Vulgate Latin renders the Hebrew virago, which is a feminine form of vir, a man. Symmachus uses ανδρις, andris, a female form of ανηρ, aner, a man. Our own term is equally proper when understood.
The words behind it
15 Hebrew wordsEvery Hebrew word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.
| Hebrew | Sound | Meaning | Word study | In the Bible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| וַיֹּאמֶר֮ | vaiyomer | and he said | H559 → | 5305 times |
| הָֽאָדָם֒ | haadam | the man | H120 → | 551 times |
| זֹ֣את | zot | this [one] | H2063 → | 603 times |
| הַפַּ֗עַם | hapaam | this time | H6471 → | 118 times |
| עֶ֚צֶם | ʾetzem | [is] bone | H6106 → | 126 times |
| מֵֽעֲצָמַ֔י | meatzamai | from bones my | H6106 → | 126 times |
| וּבָשָׂ֖ר | uvasar | and flesh | H1320 → | 270 times |
| מִבְּשָׂרִ֑י | mibesari | from flesh my | H1320 → | 270 times |
| לְזֹאת֙ | lezot | to this [one] | H2063 → | 603 times |
| יִקָּרֵ֣א | yikare' | <it> will be called | H7121 → | 733 times |
| אִשָּׁ֔ה | ʾishah | woman | H802 → | 781 times |
| כִּ֥י | ki | for | H3588 → | 4482 times |
| מֵאִ֖ישׁ | meish | from a man | H376 → | 1663 times |
| לֻֽקֳחָה־ | lukochah- | she was taken | H3947 → | 966 times |
| זֹּֽאת׃ | zot | this [one] | H2063 → | 603 times |
וַיֹּאמֶר֮and he said
vaiyomerH559 →5305 times
הָֽאָדָם֒the man
haadamH120 →551 times
זֹ֣אתthis [one]
zotH2063 →603 times
הַפַּ֗עַםthis time
hapaamH6471 →118 times
עֶ֚צֶם[is] bone
ʾetzemH6106 →126 times
מֵֽעֲצָמַ֔יfrom bones my
meatzamaiH6106 →126 times
וּבָשָׂ֖רand flesh
uvasarH1320 →270 times
מִבְּשָׂרִ֑יfrom flesh my
mibesariH1320 →270 times
לְזֹאת֙to this [one]
lezotH2063 →603 times
יִקָּרֵ֣א<it> will be called
yikare'H7121 →733 times
אִשָּׁ֔הwoman
ʾishahH802 →781 times
כִּ֥יfor
kiH3588 →4482 times
מֵאִ֖ישׁfrom a man
meishH376 →1663 times
לֻֽקֳחָה־she was taken
lukochah-H3947 →966 times
זֹּֽאת׃this [one]
zotH2063 →603 times
A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.
The walk
8 stopsEach card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.
Through
Genesis 29:14Then Laban declared, “You are indeed my own flesh and blood.” After Jacob had stayed with him a month,
it leads to
- Judges 9:2
“Please ask all the leaders of Shechem, ‘Is it better for you that seventy men, all the sons of Jerubbaal, rule over you, or just one man?’ Remember that I am your own flesh…
Reached by 2 separate paths from here.
- 2 Samuel 19:12–13
You are my brothers, my own flesh and blood. So why should you be the last to restore the king?’
- 2 Samuel 5:1
Then all the tribes of Israel came to David at Hebron and said, “Here we are, your own flesh and blood.
- Judges 9:2
Through
Judges 9:2“Please ask all the leaders of Shechem, ‘Is it better for you that seventy men, all the sons of Jerubbaal, rule over you, or just one man?’ Remember that I am your own flesh…
it leads to
- Genesis 29:14
Then Laban declared, “You are indeed my own flesh and blood.” After Jacob had stayed with him a month,
Reached by 2 separate paths from here.
- Judges 8:30
Gideon had seventy sons of his own, since he had many wives.
- Hebrews 2:14
Now since the children have flesh and blood, He too shared in their humanity, so that by His death He might destroy him who holds the power of death, that is, the devil,
- Genesis 29:14
Through
2 Samuel 5:1Then all the tribes of Israel came to David at Hebron and said, “Here we are, your own flesh and blood.
it leads to
- 1 Chronicles 11:1–3
Then all Israel came together to David at Hebron and said, “Here we are, your own flesh and blood.
- 2 Samuel 19:13
And say to Amasa, ‘Aren’t you my flesh and blood? May God punish me, and ever so severely, if from this time you are not the commander of my army in place of Joab!’”
Reached by 2 separate paths from here.
- 1 Chronicles 11:1–3
Where this verse is studied
On this page
Studies16
On this verse
About Genesis

This page draws on 21 works. Open the list of works
This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Augustine of Hippo, ON THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF GENESIS 9.19.36; Bede, Commentary on Genesis (Hexaemeron); Bonaventure, Collationes de Septem Donis, Collation 6; Bonaventure, Disputed Questions on Evangelical Perfection, Question 3; Clement of Rome, Clement's First Letter to the Corinthians, Chapter 6; Cosmas Indicopleustes, The Christian Topography, Book 3; Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lecture 12:29; Ephrem the Syrian, Commentary (church-history corpus); Ephrem the Syrian, COMMENTARIES ON GENESIS 2.13.2; Jerome, Hebrew Questions on Genesis; John Chrysostom, Commentary (church-history corpus); John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament (1748-1763); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Quodvultdeus, BOOK OF PROMISES AND PREDICTIONS OF GOD 1.3; Tertullian, A Treatise on the Soul; Tertullian, On Prayer; Tertullian, On the Veiling of Virgins and Tertullian, On the Resurrection of the Flesh.
