Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Hebrews 7:10

in Hebrews 7

For when Melchizedek met Abraham, Levi was still in the loin of his ancestor.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV

ASV

for he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchizedek met him.

KJV

For he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedec met him.

This verse in Hebrews 7

Commentary

13 notes on this verse
For he was yet in the loins of his father - Abraham is here called the father of Levi, by a common use of the word, referring to a more remote ancestor than the literal father. The meaning of the apostle is, that he was even then, in a certain sense, in the loins of Abraham, when Melchizedek met him; or it was all the same as if he were there, and had then an existence.

This site's exposition

Levi also, who receiveth tithes, payed tithes in Abraham

on Hebrews 7:9-10

The argument reaches its hinge: Levi also, who receives tithes from Israel, in a sense paid tithes to Melchisedec, because he was yet in the loins of his father Abraham when Melchisedec met him. The logic treats the nation as present in its ancestor, a common way of reasoning in the letter's Jewish setting and not a claim about personal moral responsibility. If Levi himself, tithe collector by law, is shown paying tithes through Abraham, then Levi's whole priesthood is placed under Melchisedec's, not above it.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers5 voices

A commentator

Oecumenius

The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews · Written before 550.

proposed

"For he was still in the loins." The seed that was the beginning of Levi's life was within the loins of Abraham. Indeed, Isaac was the cause and origin of Levi.

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

ON THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF GENESIS 10.19.34-21.37 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

Why is it that Scripture reports, for the sake of the tremendous difference between the priesthood of Christ and that of Levi, that Levi paid a tithe to Melchizedek when he was in the loins of Abraham, since Christ was also there, and so both Levi and Christ paid the tithe? Unless it is because we should understand that, in some other way, Christ was not there? But who would deny that Christ was there according to the flesh? Then he was not there according to the soul, for the soul of Christ did not originate through the transmission of the sin of Adam, or else he would have been there.…Levi was surely there in the loins of Abraham in accordance with the transmission of human seed by which he would enter into his mother; Christ was not there through that cause, although the flesh of Mary was. Thus, neither Levi nor Christ were present there according to the soul, but both of them were there according to the flesh. Levi was there according to fleshly desire, while Christ was there only according to his physical substance. For in a seed, there is both a visible physicality and an invisible principle. Both ran their course from Abraham, even from Adam himself, all the way to the body of Mary, since that too was conceived and born in the normal way. So Christ assumed the physical substance of flesh from the flesh of the virgin, but the reason for his conception did not come from a man's seed, but from a much different source—from above. So for this reason, the flesh which he assumed from his mother was also present in the loins of Abraham. So Levi paid a tithe in Abraham, who, although he was only there according to the flesh, was still there in the loins of Abraham, as Abraham also was once in the loins of his own father. […]
We now advance in reply to such as argue that one who is born of a baptized man ought himself to be regarded as already baptized. "For why," they ask, "could he not have been baptized in the loins of his father, when, according to the Epistle to the Hebrews, Levi was able to pay tithes in the loins of Abraham?" They who propose this argument ought to observe that Levi did not on this account subsequently not pay tithes, because he had paid tithes already in the loins of Abraham, but because he was ordained to the office of the priesthood in order to receive tithes, not to pay them; otherwise neither would his brethren, who all contributed their tithes to him, have been tithed—because they too, whilst in the loins of Abraham, had already paid tithes to Melchisedec.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Hebrews 12 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

How? "For he was yet in his loins when Melchisedec met him," i.e. Levi was in him, although he was not yet born. And he said not the Levites but Levi. Hast thou seen the superiority? Hast thou seen how great is the interval between Abraham and Melchisedec, who bears the type of our High Priest? And he shows that the superiority had been caused by authority, not necessity. For the one paid the tithe, which indicates the priest: the other gave the blessing, which indicates the superior. This superiority passes on also to the descendants. In a marvelous and triumphant way he cast out the Jewish system. On this account he said, "Ye are become dull," because he wished to lay these foundations, that they might not start away. Such is the wisdom of Paul, first preparing them well, he so leads them into what he wishes. For the human race is hard to persuade, and needs much attention, even more than plants. Since in that case there is only the nature of material bodies, and earth, which yields to the hands of the husbandmen: but in this there is will, which is liable to many alterations, and now prefers this, now that. For it quickly turns to evil.

A commentator

Ephrem the Syrian

COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS · Written before 373.

proposed

Through Abraham, who gave him the tenth part, the house of Levi, which had to be generated by him, took the tenth part in him. The Levites, even though they took the tenth part, did not take it from strangers but received the tenth part …
6 more voices on this verse

The Medieval Church3 voices

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Hebrews · Written before 1107.

proposed

He shows in what way Levi paid tithes, saying that since the forefather paid tithes, so too did he, by virtue of the fact that being already in the loins of Abraham, he was to be born from his seed, although he had not yet …

A commentator

Photios I of Constantinople

FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 7.9-10 · Written before 893.

proposed

He says, that because Abraham paid tithes, also Levi "who receives tithes himself was made to tithe," that is, he gave a tithe. We must underscore the phrase "through Abraham," so that the meaning does not suffer violence. For because Abraham was made to tithe, …

A commentator

Thomas Aquinas

Commentary on Hebrews · Written before 1274.

proposed

346. – Then (v. 10) he explains what he had said; and he says that Levi was still in the loins of his father, Abraham, when he gave tithes to Melchizedek, who met him. Consequently, when Abraham was tithed, Levi was tithed. But on the …

The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice

For he was yet in the loins of his father,....

The Nineteenth Century2 voices

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

BENGEL remarks, The blessings which Abraham had before meeting Melchisedec were the general promises, and the special one of a natural seed, and so of Levi; but the promises under which Christ was comprehended, and the faith for which Abraham was so commended, followed after Abraham's meeting Melchisedec, and being blessed by him: to which fact.

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

For he was yet in the loins of his father - That is, Levi was seminally included in Abraham, his forefather.

The words behind it

12 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Genesis 35:11

    And God told him, “I am God Almighty. Be fruitful and multiply. A nation—even a company of nations—shall come from you, and kings shall descend from you.

    it leads to

    • Genesis 17:1

      When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the LORD appeared to him and said, “I am God Almighty. Walk before Me and be blameless.

    • Genesis 22:17

      I will surely bless you, and I will multiply your descendants like the stars in the sky and the sand on the seashore. Your descendants will possess the gates of their enemies.

    • Genesis 9:1

      And God blessed Noah and his sons and said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.

    • Genesis 17:5–7

      No longer will you be called Abram, but your name will be Abraham, for I have made you a father of many nations.

    • Exodus 6:3

      I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as God Almighty, but by My name the LORD I did not make Myself known to them.

  • Through

    Genesis 46:26

    All those belonging to Jacob who came to Egypt—his direct descendants, besides the wives of Jacob’s sons—numbered sixty-six persons.

    it leads to

    • Exodus 1:5

      The descendants of Jacob numbered seventy in all, including Joseph, who was already in Egypt.

  • Through

    1 Kings 8:19

    Nevertheless, you are not the one to build it; but your son, your own offspring, will build the house for My Name.’

    it leads to

    • 2 Samuel 7:5

      “Go and tell My servant David that this is what the LORD says: Are you the one to build for Me a house to dwell in?

    • 1 Chronicles 22:8–10

      but this word of the LORD came to me: ‘You have shed much blood and waged great wars. You are not to build a house for My Name because you have shed so much…

Where this verse is studied

About Hebrews

This page draws on 14 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Augustine of Hippo, ON THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF GENESIS 10.19.34-21.37; Augustine of Hippo, ON THE MERITS AND FORGIVENESS OF SINS AND ON INFANT BAPTISM 2.39; Ephrem the Syrian, COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Calvin, Commentary on Hebrews; John Chrysostom, Homily on Hebrews 12; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Oecumenius, The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews; Photios I of Constantinople, FRAGMENTS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS 7.9-10; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Hebrews and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Hebrews.