Daniel 9:26
in Daniel 9Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and will have nothing. Then the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. The end will come like a flood, and until the end there will be war; desolations have been decreed.
BSB
The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾
ASV
And after the threescore and two weeks shall the anointed one be cut off, and shall have nothing: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and even unto the end shall be war; desolations are determined.
KJV
And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
⋯
This verse in Daniel 9
Commentary
19 notes on this verseVerses 24-27. "'Seventy weeks are shortened upon thy people and upon thy holy city, that transgression may be finished, and sin may have an end, and iniquity may be abolished, and everlasting justice may be brought to bear, and that the vision and prophecy may be fulfilled that the Holy One of the saints may be anointed. Know therefore and take note that from the going forth of the word to build up Jerusalem again, unto Christ the prince, there shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks, and the street shall be built again, and the walls, in distressing times.
This site's exposition
the Messiah will be cut off
After the sixty-two weeks “the Messiah will be cut off and will have nothing”. Nearly all take “the people of the prince who is to come” as the legions of Titus. The older writers read the flood as the trouble from the cross to the fall of the temple.
The record, by era
The Church Fathers5 voices
Now you hesitate to believe what we have stated, although you see that these things have happened. Therefore we ought to seek again the times that were foretold, both as pertaining to the birth and suffering of Christ and the removal of the city Jerusalem, that is, its destruction. Daniel says that the holy city and its sanctuary will be removed when the prince comes and that its pinnacle would be utterly destroyed. The times for the coming of the Christ must be sought again, as we found out in Daniel.
A commentator
Origen of AlexandriaSt. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, Chapter Nine · Written before 253.
proposed
When Origen came to deal with this chapter, he urged us to seek out what information we do not possess; and because he had no leeway for allegorical interpretation, in which one may argue without constraint, but rather was restricted to matters of historical fact, he made this brief observation in the tenth volume of the <i>Stromata:</i> "We must quite carefully ascertain the amount of time between the first year of Darius, the son of Ahasuerus, and the advent of Christ, and discover how many years were involved, and what events are said to have occurred during them. Then we must see whether we can fit these data in with the time of the Lord's coming."
A commentator
Eusebius of CaesareaSt. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER NINE · Written before 339.
proposed
It does not seem to me that the seventy weeks have been divided up without purpose, in that seven is mentioned first, and then sixty-two, and then a last week is added, which in turn is itself divided into two parts. For it is written: 'Thou shalt know and understand that from the issuing of the word (command) that the petition be granted and Jerusalem be built until Christ the Prince there shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks.' And after the rest which he relates in the intervening section, he states at the end: 'He shall confirm a testimony (covenant) with many during one week.' It is clear that the angel did not detail these things in his reply to no purpose or apart from the inspiration of God. This observation seems to require some cautious and careful reasoning, so that the reader may pay diligent attention and inquire into the cause for this division (variant: vision). But if we must express our own opinion, in conformity with the rest of the interpretation which concerns this present context, in the angel's statement: 'From the issuing of the word that the petition be granted and that Jerusalem be built, until the time of Christ the Prince,' we are only to think of other princes who had charge of the Jewish people subsequent to this prophecy and subsequent to the return from Babylon. That is to say, we are to think of the <i>arkhiereis</i> and pontiffs to whom the Scripture attaches the title of christs, by reason of the fact that they have been anointed. The first of these was Jesus the son of Jehozadak, the high priest, and then the rest who had that office up until the time of the advent of our Lord and Savior. […]
A commentator
Clement of AlexandriaSt. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER NINE · Written before 215.
proposed
The learned scholar Clement, presbyter of the church at Alexandria, regards the number of years as a matter of slight consequence, asserting that the seventy weeks of years were completed by the span of time from the reign of Cyrus, King of the Persians, to the reign of the Roman emperors, Vespasian and Titus; that is to say, the interval of four hundred and ninety years, with the addition in that same figure of the two thousand three hundred days of which we made earlier mention. He attempts to reckon in these seventy weeks the ages of the Persians, Macedonians, and Caesars, even though according to the most careful computation, the number of years from the first year of Cyrus, King of the Persians and Medes, when Darius also bore rule, up to the reign of Vespasian and the destruction of the Temple amounts to six hundred and thirty.
This is what [Daniel] says when he talks about the seventy weeks: "Seventy weeks will be for the rebuilding of Jerusalem and sixty-two weeks until Christ the prince. After the sixty-two weeks the Christ will be killed, and he will have nothing. And a people …
12 more voices on this verse
The Church Fathers3 voices
A commentator
Julius AfricanusSt. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER NINE · Written before 240.
proposed
The chapter which we read in Daniel concerning the seventy weeks contains many remarkable details, which require too lengthy a discussion at this point; and so we must discuss only what pertains to our present task, namely that which concerns chronology. There is no doubt …
We may learn what Tertullian had to say on the subject by consulting the book which he wrote against the Jews <i>(Contra Judaeos),</i> and his remarks may be set forth in brief: "How, then, are we to show that Christ came within the sixty-two weeks? This calculation begins with the first year of Darius, since that was the time when the vision itself was revealed to Daniel. For he was told: 'Understand and conclude from the prophesying of the command for me to give thee this reply...' Hence we are to commence our computation with the first year of Darius, when Daniel beheld this vision. Let us see, then, how the years are fulfilled up to the advent of Christ. Darius reigned nineteen years; Artaxerxes forty years; the Ochus who was surnamed Cyrus twenty-four years; Argus, one year. Then Darius II, who was called Melas, twenty-one years. Alexander the Macedonian reigned twelve years. And then after Alexander (who had ruled over both the Medes and the Persians, after he had conquered them, and had established his rule in Alexandria, calling it after his own name), Soter reigned there in Alexandria for thirty-five years, and was succeeded by Philadelphus, who reigned for thirty-eight years. After him Euergetes reigned for twenty-five years, and then Philopator for seventeen years, followed by Epiphanes for twenty-four years. Furthermore the second Euergetes ruled for twenty and nine years, and Soter for thirty-eight years. Ptolemy for thirty-seven years, and Cleopatra for twenty years and five months. Furthermore Cleopatra shared the rule with Augustus for thirteen years. After Cleopatra Augustus reigned forty-three years more. For all of the years of the reign of Augustus were fifty-six in number. And let us see (variant: we see) that in the forty-first year of the reign of Augustus, who ruled after the death of Cleopatra, Christ was born. […]
A commentator
Hippolytus of RomeSt. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER NINE · Written before 235.
proposed
But Hippolytus has expressed the following opinion concerning these same weeks: he reckons the seven weeks as prior to the return of the people from Babylon, and the sixty-two weeks as subsequent to their return and extending to the birth of Christ. But the dates do not agree at all. If indeed the duration of the Persian Empire be reckoned at two hundred and thirty years, and the Macedonian Empire at three hundred, and the period thereafter up to the birth of the Lord be thirty years, then the total from the beginning of the reign of Cyrus, King of the Persians, until the advent of the Savior will be five hundred and sixty years. Moreover Hippolytus places the final week at the end of the world and divides it into the period of Elias and the period of Antichrist, so that during the three and a half years of the last week the knowledge of God is established. And as for the statement, "He shall establish a compact with many for a week" (Daniel 9:27), during the other three years under the Antichrist the sacrifice and offering shall cease. But when Christ shall come and shall slay the wicked one by the breath of His mouth, desolation shall hold sway till the end.
The Medieval Church2 voices
Theodoret interprets ("the king who will come") as the foreign kingship and the unlawful doctrine. Others say, "With the king who will come," meaning with the Christ who will come. Instead of the words "the anointed one shall be killed," the Jews [say foolishly], "The …
A commentator
BonaventureCollations on the Hexaemeron, Collation 9 · Written in the 13th century.
proposed
The full accord of the witnesses is found in the words of Scriptures. Isaiah says: The virgin shall be with child; and Luke: Thou shalt conceive. One says: Christ shall be slain; and the Evangelist: Put Him to death. Whatever, then, had been foretold by …
The Puritans and the Awakening3 voices
And after - After the seven and the sixty two that followed them. Not for himself - But for our sakes, and for our salvation. And the people - The Roman under the conduct of Titus.
And it is the clearest, brightest, prophecy of the Messiah, in all the Old Testament. Daniel's Confession and Prayer. 1 In the first year of Darius the son of Ahasuerus, of the seed of the Medes, which was made king over the realm of the Chaldeans;
quarantine:scripture (2026-07-29) — verbatim-run:26w-of-46
And after threescore and two weeks,....
The Nineteenth Century3 voices
And the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary - By the “prince” Titus, the son of Vespasian, is plainly intended; and “the people of that prince” are no other than the Romans, who, according to the prophecy, destroyed the sanctuary, הקדש hakkodesh, the holy place or temple, and, as a flood, swept away all, till the total destruction of that obstinate people finished the war.
A commentator
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown1802–1910
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
proposed
after threescore and two weeks--rather, the threescore and two weeks. In this verse, and in Da 9:27, Messiah is made the prominent subject, while the fate of the city and sanctuary are secondary, being mentioned only in the second halves of the verses. Messiah appears in a twofold aspect, salvation to believers, judgment on unbelievers (Lu 2:34; compare Mal 3:1-6;
quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — starts-lowercase+unbalanced-parens
A commentator
Albert Barnes1798–1870
Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869)
proposed
And after threescore and two weeks - After the completion of the last period of four hundred and thirty-four years. The angel had shown in the previous verse what would be the characteristic of the first period of “seven weeks” - that during that time the wall and the street would be built in circumstances of general distress and anxiety, and he now proceeds to state what would occur in relation to the remaining sixty-two weeks. The particular thing which would characterize that period would be, that the Messiah would be cut off, and that the series of events would commence which would terminate in the destruction of the city and the temple. He does not say that this would be immediately on the termination of the sixty-two weeks, but he says that it would be “after” אחרי 'achărēy - “subsequent” to the close of that period. The word does not mean necessarily immediately, but it denotes what is to succeed - to follow - and would be well expressed by the word “afterward:” Gen 15:14; Gen 23:19; Gen 25:26, et al. See Gesenius, Lexicon The natural meaning here would be, that this would be the “next event” in the order of events to be reckoned; it would be that on which the prophetic eye would rest subsequent to the close of the period of sixty-two weeks. […]
Modern Voices1 voice
A commentator
Chuck Missler1934–2018
The Book of Daniel: Daniel 9 (article, excerpted from Daniel's 70 Weeks) · Written before 2018.
proposed
Gabriel proceeds to give Daniel the most astonishing four verses in the entire Bible: 24, 25, 26, and 27.
The words behind it
21 Hebrew wordsEvery Hebrew word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.
| Hebrew | Sound | Meaning | Word study | In the Bible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| וְאַחֲרֵ֤י | veacharei | and after | H310 → | |
| הַשָּׁבֻעִים֙ | hashavuim | the sevens | H7620 → | 20 times |
| שִׁשִּׁ֣ים | shishim | sixty | H8346 → | |
| וּשְׁנַ֔יִם | ushenayim | and two | H8147 → | 768 times |
| יִכָּרֵ֥ת | yikaret | he will be cut off | H3772 → | |
| מָשִׁ֖יחַ | mashiach | an anointed [one] | H4899 → | |
| וְאֵ֣ין | veein | and nothing | H369 → | 789 times |
| ל֑וֹ | lo | [will belong] to him | ||
| וְהָעִ֨יר | vehair | and the city | H5892 → | 1090 times |
| וְהַקֹּ֜דֶשׁ | vehakodesh | and the sanctuary | H6944 → | 469 times |
| יַ֠שְׁחִית | yashchit | it will destroy | H7843 → | 146 times |
| עַ֣ם | ʾam | [the] people of | H5971 → | 1873 times |
| נָגִ֤יד | nagid | a prince | H5057 → | 45 times |
| הַבָּא֙ | haba' | who is coming | H935 → | 2568 times |
| וְקִצּ֣וֹ | vekitzo | and end his | H7093 → | 67 times |
| בַשֶּׁ֔טֶף | vashetef | [will be] by <the> flood | H7858 → | |
| וְעַד֙ | vead | and [will be] until | H5704 → | 1261 times |
| קֵ֣ץ | ketz | [the] end | H7093 → | 67 times |
| מִלְחָמָ֔ה | milchamah | war | H4421 → | 320 times |
| נֶחֱרֶ֖צֶת | necheretzet | [are] determined | H2782 → | 11 times |
| שֹׁמֵמֽוֹת׃ | shomemot | desolate [things] | H8074 → | 86 times |
וְאַחֲרֵ֤יand after
veachareiH310 →
הַשָּׁבֻעִים֙the sevens
hashavuimH7620 →20 times
שִׁשִּׁ֣יםsixty
shishimH8346 →
וּשְׁנַ֔יִםand two
ushenayimH8147 →768 times
יִכָּרֵ֥תhe will be cut off
yikaretH3772 →
מָשִׁ֖יחַan anointed [one]
mashiachH4899 →
וְאֵ֣יןand nothing
veeinH369 →789 times
ל֑וֹ[will belong] to him
lo
וְהָעִ֨ירand the city
vehairH5892 →1090 times
וְהַקֹּ֜דֶשׁand the sanctuary
vehakodeshH6944 →469 times
יַ֠שְׁחִיתit will destroy
yashchitH7843 →146 times
עַ֣ם[the] people of
ʾamH5971 →1873 times
נָגִ֤ידa prince
nagidH5057 →45 times
הַבָּא֙who is coming
haba'H935 →2568 times
וְקִצּ֣וֹand end his
vekitzoH7093 →67 times
בַשֶּׁ֔טֶף[will be] by <the> flood
vashetefH7858 →
וְעַד֙and [will be] until
veadH5704 →1261 times
קֵ֣ץ[the] end
ketzH7093 →67 times
מִלְחָמָ֔הwar
milchamahH4421 →320 times
נֶחֱרֶ֖צֶת[are] determined
necheretzetH2782 →11 times
שֹׁמֵמֽוֹת׃desolate [things]
shomemotH8074 →86 times
A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.
The walk
8 stopsEach card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.
Through
1 Peter 2:24He Himself bore our sins in His body on the tree, so that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. “By His stripes you are healed.”
it leads to
- Isaiah 53:4–6
Surely He took on our infirmities and carried our sorrows; yet we considered Him stricken by God, struck down and afflicted.
- Matthew 8:17
This was to fulfill what was spoken through the prophet Isaiah: “He took on our infirmities and carried our diseases.”
- Romans 6:11
So you too must count yourselves dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus.
- Revelation 22:2
down the middle of the main street of the city. On either side of the river stood a tree of life, bearing twelve kinds of fruit and yielding a fresh crop for each month.…
- 1 John 2:29
If you know that He is righteous, you also know that everyone who practices righteousness has been born of Him.
- Isaiah 53:4–6
Through
Isaiah 53:8By oppression and judgment He was taken away, and who can recount His descendants? For He was cut off from the land of the living; He was stricken for the transgression of My people.
it leads to
- 1 Peter 3:18
For Christ also suffered for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit,
- Acts 8:33
In His humiliation He was deprived of justice. Who can recount His descendants? For His life was removed from the earth.”
- 1 Peter 3:18
Through
Luke 24:26Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and then to enter His glory?”
it leads to
- 1 Peter 1:11
trying to determine the time and setting to which the Spirit of Christ in them was pointing when He predicted the sufferings of Christ and the glories to follow.
- 1 Peter 1:11
Where this verse is studied
On this page
Studies18
On this verse
On this chapter
About Daniel

This page draws on 19 works. Open the list of works
This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Bonaventure, Collations on the Hexaemeron, Collation 9; Carl Friedrich Keil, Biblical Commentary on the Book of Daniel; Chuck Missler, The Book of Daniel: Daniel 9 (article, excerpted from Daniel's 70 Weeks); Clement of Alexandria, St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER NINE; Eusebius of Caesarea, St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER NINE; Hippolytus of Rome, St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER NINE; Ishodad of Merv, COMMENTARY ON DANIEL 9:26; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jerome, St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER NINE; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament (1748-1763); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Julius Africanus, St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER NINE; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Origen of Alexandria, St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, Chapter Nine; Primasius of Hadrumetum, COMMENTARY ON THE APOCALYPSE 3:11; Tertullian, AN ANSWER TO THE JEWS 8 and Tertullian, St. Jerome, Commentary on Daniel, CHAPTER NINE.
