Skip to content
mannafest.faith

John 5:16

in John 5

Now because Jesus was doing these things on the Sabbath, the Jews began to persecute Him.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

And for this cause the Jews persecuted Jesus, because he did these things on the sabbath.

KJV

And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, and sought to slay him, because he had done these things on the sabbath day.

This verse in John 5

Commentary

20 notes on this verse

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

And sought to slay him - This clause is omitted by BCDL, some others, and several ancient versions. Griesbach has left it out of the text; and Professor White says, certissime delenda: but it does not appear to me that it should be omitted. However, it was true of the Jews, whether the words were originally in the evangelist or not. For what cause did these persons seek to destroy our Lord? Because he had healed a poor man, who had been diseased thirty-eight years, and ordered him to carry home the couch on which he lay!

This site's exposition

told the Jews that it was Jesus

on John 5:15-16

The man goes back and tells the Jews it was Jesus who made him well. The Jews begin to persecute Jesus for doing these things on the Sabbath. A healing has become evidence in a case.

This site's exposition

the Jews began to persecute Him

Some manuscripts add that they sought to kill Him, and Adam Clarke keeps the clause though Griesbach left it out. Clarke asks what the cause was, and answers that a man ill for thirty-eight years was healed and carried home his mat.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers5 voices

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

Tractates on John 17 · Written before 430.

proposed

The Jews persecuted the Lord Jesus because He did these things on the Sabbath-day. Let us hear what answer the Lord now made to the Jews. I have told you how He is wont to answer concerning the healing of men on the Sabbath-day, that they used not on the Sabbath-day to slight their cattle, either in delivering or in feeding them. What does He answer concerning the carrying of the bed? A manifest corporal work was done before the eyes of the Jews; not a healing of the body, but a bodily work, which appeared not so necessary as the healing. Let the Lord, then, openly declare that the sacrament of the Sabbath, even the sign of keeping one day, was given to the Jews for a time, but that the fulfillment of the sacrament had come in Himself.

A commentator

Irenaeus

Irenaeus Against Heresies Book 4 · Written before 202.

proposed

For the tradition of the elders themselves, which they pretended to observe from the law, was contrary to the law given by Moses. Wherefore also Esaias declares: "Thy dealers mix the wine with water," showing that the elders were in the habit of mingling a watered tradition with the simple command of God; that is, they set up a spurious law, and one contrary to the [true] law; as also the Lord made plain, when He said to them, "Why do ye transgress the commandment of God, for the sake of your tradition?"

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 430.

proposed

(Tr. xvii. c. 13) This announcement enraged them, And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus, because He had done these things on the sabbath day. A plain bodily work had been done before their eyes, distinct from the healing of the man's body, and which could not have been necessary, even if healing was; viz. the carrying of the bed. Wherefore our Lord openly says, that the sacrament of the Sabbath, the sign of observing one day out of seven, was only a temporary institution, which had attained its fulfilment in Him: But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work: as if He said, Do not suppose that My Father rested on the Sabbath in such a sense, as that from that time forth, He has ceased from working; for He worketh up to this time, though without labour, and so work I. God's resting means only that He made no other creature, after the creation. The Scripture calls it rest, to remind us of the rest we shall enjoy after a life of good works here. And as God only when He had made man in His own image and similitude, and finished all His works, and seen that they were very good, rested on the seventh day: so do thou expect no rest, except thou return to the likeness in which thou wert made, but which thou hast lost by sin; i. e. unless thou doest good works.

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 430.

proposed

(iv. Super Gen. ad litteram [c. xi.]) It may be said then, that the observance of the sabbath was imposed on the Jews, as the shadow of something to come; viz. that spiritual rest, which God, by the figure of His own rest promised to all who should perform good works.

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 430.

proposed

There will be a sabbath of the world, when the six ages, i. e. the six days, as it were, of the world, have passed: then will come that rest which is promised to the saints.
12 more voices on this verse

The Church Fathers1 voice

A commentator

Cyril of Alexandria

Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 2 · Written before 444.

proposed

The narrative does not herein contain the simple relation of the madness of the Jews: for the Evangelist does not show only that they persecute Him, but why they blush not to do this, saying most emphatically, Because He was doing these things on the sabbath day. For they persecute Him foolishly and blasphemously, as though the law forbad to do good on the sabbath day, as though it were not lawful to pity and compassionate the sick, as though it behoved to put off the law of love, the praise of brotherly kindness, the grace of gentleness: and what of good things may one not show that the Jews did in manifold ways spurn, not knowing the aim of the Lawgiver respecting the Sabbath, and making the observance of it most empty? For as Christ Himself somewhere said, each one of them taketh his ox, or his sheep, and leadeth them away to watering, and that a man on the sabbath day receiveth circumcision, that the law of Moses be not broken: and then they are angry, because He made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day, by reason of the exceeding stubbornness alike and undisciplinedness of their habits, not even to brutes preferring him that is made in the Divine Image, but thinking that one ought to pity a sheep on the sabbath day, and unblamed to free it from famine and thirst, yet that they are open to the charge of transgressing the law to the last degree, who are gentle and good to their neighbour on the sabbath? But that we may see that they were beyond measure senseless, and therefore with justice deserve to hear, Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures; come let us taking somewhat from the Divine Scriptures too show clearly, that Jesus was long ago foredepicted as in a type taking no account of the sabbath. […]

The Medieval Church3 voices

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on John · Written before 1107.

proposed

If the Jews began to persecute the Lord, how is this man at fault for telling them about Him? He proclaimed the Healer with a good intention, so that he might also draw others to faith. But if they began to persecute the Benefactor, that …

A commentator

Bonaventure

Commentary on John, Chapter 5 · Written in the 13th century.

proposed

"For this reason the Jews persecuted Jesus, because he did these things on the Sabbath." For he seemed to wish to destroy their Law and to oppose the Lord, who had given the commandment concerning the keeping of the Sabbath: below in the ninth chapter: …

A commentator

Thomas Aquinas

Commentary on John · Written before 1274.

proposed

Next (v 16), we have the persecution of Christ, begun because he performed a work of mercy on the Sabbath. Thus the Evangelist says, For reasons like this the Jews began to persecute Jesus, because he performed such works on the Sabbath. "Princes have persecuted …

The Puritans and the Awakening3 voices

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

The sermon was Christ's vindication of himself before the sanhedrim, when he was prosecuted as a criminal for healing the man on the sabbath day, in which, 1. He asserts his authority as Messiah, and Mediator between God and man,

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

The Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day; but he here enlarges on it. He pleads that he was the Son of God, plainly intimated in his calling God his Father; and, if so, his holiness was unquestionable and his sovereignty incontestable; and he might make what alterations he pleased of the divine law.
And therefore did the Jews persecute Jesus,....

The Nineteenth Century5 voices

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

The Jews--that is, those in authority. (See on Joh 1:19.) it is not lawful to carry thy bed--a glorious testimony to the cure, as instantaneous and complete, from the lips of the most prejudiced!

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

proposed

because he had done these things on the sabbath day--What to these hypocritical religionists was the doing of the most glorious and beneficent miracles, compared with the atrocity of doing them on the sabbath day!

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — starts-lowercase

These verses begin one of the most deep and solemn passages in the four Gospels. They show us the Lord Jesus asserting His own Divine nature, His unity with God the Father, and the high dignity of His office. No where does our Lord dwell so fully on these subjects as in the chapter before us. And no where, we must confess, do we find out so thoroughly the weakness of man's understanding! There is much, we must all feel, that is far beyond our comprehension in our Lord's account of Himself.
These verses begin one of the most deep and solemn passages in the four Gospels. They show us the Lord Jesus asserting His own Divine nature, His unity with God the Father, and the high dignity of His office. No where does our Lord dwell so fully on these subjects as in the chapter before us. And no where, we must confess, do we find out so thoroughly the weakness of man's understanding! There is much, we must all feel, that is far beyond our comprehension in our Lord's account of Himself. Such knowledge, in short, is too astonishing for us. "It is high—we cannot attain unto it." (Psalm 139:6.) How often men say that they want clear explanations of such doctrines as the Trinity. Yet here we have our Lord handling the subject of His own Person, and, behold! we cannot follow Him. We seem only to touch His meaning with the tip of our fingers. We learn, for one thing, from the verses before us, that there are some works which it is lawful to do on the Sabbath day. The Jews, as on many other occasions, found fault because Jesus healed a man who had been ill for thirty-eight years, on the Sabbath. They charged our Lord with a breach of the fourth commandment. Our Lord's reply to the Jews is very remarkable. "My Father," he says, "works hitherto, and I also work." It is as though He said—"Though my Father rested on the seventh day from His work of creation , He has never rested for a moment from His providential government of the world, and from His merciful work of supplying the daily needs of all His creatures. Were He to rest from such work, the whole frame of nature would stand still. And I also work works of mercy on the Sabbath day. I do not break the fourth commandment when I heal the sick, any more than my Father breaks it when He causes the sun to rise and the grass to grow on the Sabbath."
Persecuted Jesus - They opposed him; attempted to ruin his character; to destroy his popularity; and probably held him up before the people as a violator of the law of God. Instead of making inquiry whether he had not given proof that he was the Messiah, they “assumed” that he must be wrong, and ought to be punished. Thus every bigot and persecutor does in regard to those who differ from them. To slay him - To put him to death. This they attempted to do because it was directed in the law of Moses, Exo 31:15; Exo 35:2. See Luk 6:7, Luk 6:11; Luk 13:14. We see here, 1. How full of enmity and how bloody was the purpose of the Jews, All that Jesus had done was to restore an infirm man to health - a thing which they would have done for their cattle Luk 6:7, and yet they sought. his life because he had done it for a sick “man.” 2. Men are often extremely envious because good is done by others, especially if it is not done according to the way of their denomination or party. 3. Here was an instance of the common feelings of a hypocrite. He often covers his enmity against the power of religion by great zeal for the form of it. He hates and persecutes those who do good, who seek the conversion of sinners, who love revivals of religion and the spread of the gospel, because it is not according to some matter of form which has been established, and on which he supposes the whole safety of the church to hang. There was nothing that Jesus was more opposed to than hypocrisy, and nothing that he set himself more against than those who suppose all goodness to consist in “forms,” and all piety in the “shibboleths” of a party.

How the passage was read

On John 5:1-18

On John 5:1-18

The mat, the carrying rule, and where the ways part

“It is the sabbath day: it is not lawful for thee to carry thy bed.” The objectors stand on a real rule with a prophetic root: Jeremiah 17:21-22 forbids bearing burdens through Jerusalem's gates on the Sabbath, and the tradition codified carrying between domains as the last of the thirty-nine categories of forbidden labor (Mishnah Shabbat 7:2). The tradition's own case law even makes the fine distinction the scene turns on: one who carries out a living person on a bed is exempt FOR THE PERSON, “because the bed is secondary to the person” (Mishnah Shabbat 10:5); it is the mat alone the rule could name. Note also what no one disputes: the healing itself. Jesus healed by a word; a thirty-eight-year lameness was chronic, not mortal (mortal danger overrides the Sabbath, Mishnah Yoma 8:6), so on the tradition's categories the man could have waited one more day. Jesus refuses the wait.

Where the ways part

At verse 18 the scene reaches the real parting of the ways, and honesty requires it be said plainly: Jesus “said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.” Here the difference is not over practice but over an essential of the Christian faith. Judaism then and now confesses the one God and reads such a claim by a man as blasphemy; Christian confession holds that Jesus' claim is true, that the Son does what the Father does (5:19-29). The two readings cannot both be right, and this page presents each side in its own words, with respect and without blur.

This section is reception history: how the passage was read and kept in the Jewish tradition. Where a reading parts from an essential of the Christian faith, the section says so at that point.

Sources: Mishnah Shabbat 7:2 (carrying, the last category) · Mishnah Shabbat 10:5 (the person exempt, the bed secondary) · Mishnah Yoma 8:6 (danger to life overrides the Sabbath)

The words behind it

13 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    John 10:39

    At this, they tried again to seize Him, but He escaped their grasp.

    it leads to

    • John 8:59

      At this, they picked up stones to throw at Him. But Jesus was hidden and went out of the temple area.

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • John 7:30

      So they tried to seize Him, but no one laid a hand on Him, because His hour had not yet come.

    • John 7:44

      Some of them wanted to seize Him, but no one laid a hand on Him.

    • Luke 4:29–30

      They got up, drove Him out of the town, and led Him to the brow of the hill on which the town was built, in order to throw Him over the cliff.

    • John 10:31

      At this, the Jews again picked up stones to stone Him.

  • Through

    Mark 3:6

    At this, the Pharisees went out and began plotting with the Herodians how they might kill Jesus.

    it leads to

    • Mark 12:13

      Later, they sent some of the Pharisees and Herodians to catch Jesus in His words.

    • Matthew 22:16

      They sent their disciples to Him along with the Herodians. “Teacher,” they said, “we know that You are honest and that You teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You seek…

  • Through

    John 5:13

    But the man who was healed did not know who it was, for Jesus had slipped away while the crowd was there.

    it leads to

    • Luke 24:31

      Then their eyes were opened and they recognized Jesus—and He disappeared from their sight.

Where this verse is studied

About John

The Healing at the Pool of Bethesda — Gustave Doré (engraving), public domain
The Healing at the Pool of Bethesda — Gustave Doré (engraving), public domain
This page draws on 13 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Augustine of Hippo, Tractates on John 17; Augustine of Hippo, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Bonaventure, Commentary on John, Chapter 5; Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 2; Irenaeus, Irenaeus Against Heresies Book 4; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: John (lightly modernized text, Grace Gems edition); Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on John and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on John.