Genesischapter 44
34 verses · Moses, by tradition · 15th to 13th century BC · The Law
Put my cup, the silver one, in the mouth of the youngest one’s sack, along with the silver for his grain.” So the steward did as Joseph had instructed.
Introduction
Moses, by tradition, The Law, Genesis Overview.
This chapter holds the test the whole Joseph account has been building toward. The brothers are given a clean way home, at the cost of the youngest son of Rachel. Israel heard it as the place where one brother learned to stand in another's place. Listen for the speech that fills the second half, the longest in Genesis, and for the father it keeps returning to. Ask what these men would have done twenty years earlier. The answer here is the one the tribe of Judah carried into its future.
Context
- Who
- Israel in the wilderness, hearing a brother offer his own body in the place of another's
- What
- A narrative of the test of the silver cup and Judah's plea to be kept as a slave in Benjamin's place.
- Where
- The road out of the city, and Joseph's house in Egypt.
- When
- About 1875 BC on the traditional chronology, the morning after the meal of chapter 43.
- Why
- To show that the brothers have changed, since the man who proposed selling Joseph now offers himself for Rachel's other son.
Historical context
The chapter is Judah's, since he speaks for the brothers in front of the governor of Egypt and makes the longest speech in the book of Genesis. The time is the day after the meal, and the place is the road out of the city and then the house the party is marched back to.
Show the rest of the historical context, 3 more paragraphs
The occasion is a planted cup and the test it sets up. Reading omens from patterns in liquid, the behaviour of oil poured on water or of drops in wine, was a recognised technique across Egypt and Mesopotamia. Taking a diviner's instrument was theft of a cultic object.
What a first hearer followed closely is the bargaining over the penalty. The brothers offer death for the thief and slavery for the rest, and the steward reduces it to the one term that traps them, that only the man found with the cup becomes a slave.
That reduction is the whole test. Eleven brothers are offered a clear road home without Rachel's remaining son, on the same terms they took at Dothan with Rachel's first.
Significance
The man who proposed selling Joseph is the man who offers to be sold for Benjamin. Israel was watching a repentance completed rather than merely felt.
Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph
The tribe that would carry the throne is the one that first said, take me instead.
This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.
What is done
A seam of the reading cycle falls inside this chapter. The portion Miketz ends at Genesis 44:17 and the portion Vayigash begins at 44:18, so a congregation hears the discovery of the cup on one Sabbath and Judah's speech on the next, and the chapter's two halves are never read together (src/lib/hebraic/readings.ts, the entries for portions ten and eleven). The break falls at the sentence where Judah steps forward, which is where the classical commentary also changes register: Rashi's comment on that verse is about how a man gets a hearing from a ruler rather than about the cup at all.
How it is read
Rashi reads the brothers' protest as a piece of formal reasoning. Their argument from the returned money to the stolen cup is "one of the ten inferences from minor to major mentioned in the Bible", and he sends the reader to the list in Genesis Rabbah 92:7 (Rashi on Genesis 44:8:1, the Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary by M. Rosenbaum and A. M. Silbermann, 1929 to 1934, public domain). The search beginning at the eldest he explains as concealment, "so that they should not perceive that he knew where it was", on Genesis Rabbah 92:8, and the loading of the asses as a note on the men themselves, "They were stalwart men and did not require the assistance of each other in loading" (Rashi on Genesis 44:12:1 and 44:13:1). Judah's opening words he reads as a request that they be heard rather than merely spoken, "May my words penetrate into your ears", on Genesis Rabbah 93:6 (Rashi on Genesis 44:18:1), and he reads Judah's whole speech as an accusation that the questioning had been a pretext from the first (Rashi on Genesis 44:19:1). The fear that Benjamin would die on the road he grounds in the family's own history, "because indeed his mother died during a journey" (Rashi on Genesis 44:22:1). Radak says at the outset what the chapter is: "Joseph arranged this whole charade in order to discomfort the brothers and to make them feel afraid" without doing them real harm (Radak on Genesis 44:1:1, translated by Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash, CC-BY), and he glosses two constructions in the Hebrew as ordinary usage with parallels elsewhere in Scripture (Radak on Genesis 44:3:1 and 44:4:1). Sforno follows Judah's retelling step by step and reads it as an account of duress: the brothers had told the man the truth, their father had still refused, and "due to the severity of the famine we forced our father to send the lad" (Sforno on Genesis 44:23:1, 44:24:1 and 44:25:1, Munk translation, CC-BY). Ramban's English is in the corpus on Jacob's words about his wife's two sons, and he opens by asking why the argument works at all (Ramban on Genesis 44:27:1, the Commentary on the Torah by Ramban, translated and annotated by Charles B. Chavel, Shilo Publishing House, New York, 1971 to 1976, CC-BY). Ibn Ezra comments here at 44:5:1 and 44:21:1 and Malbim at 44:26:1, and the corpus holds no English of either under a licence permitting quotation, so they stand as citations.
What the rabbis say
The corpus records forty rabbinic locators on this chapter, thirty-nine of them Midrash and one Talmud. Midrash Lekach Tov is the densest work here, cited at Genesis 44:2:1, 44:2:2, 44:6:1, 44:21:1, 44:22:1, 44:23:1, 44:25:1, 44:26:1, 44:28:1 and 44:34:1 and at Genesis 41:1:1 and Exodus 9:29:1. Bereshit Rabbati is cited at Parashat Miketz 27, 52, 53 and 54 and at Parashat Vayigash 1, Midrash Sekhel Tov at Bereshit 44:5:1, 44:5:2, 44:6:1 and 44:7:1, Bereshit Rabbah at 84:17, 84:20, 92:6, 92:8, 92:9 and 100:3, and Aggadat Bereshit at 22:2, 56:1, 61:3, 76:1 and 76:3. The Ein Yaakov collection is cited five times, at Taanit 1:43, Pesakhim 1:12, Ketubot 3:1 and Sotah 1:50 in the Glick edition and at Ketubbot 3:1. Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai 14:20 is cited once, at Judah's offer to stay in the boy's place. The single Talmud locator is Avot DeRabbi Natan, Recension B 44:2, at the inference from minor to major. Rashi hands on further sayings with their locators, among them Genesis Rabbah 92:7, 92:8, 93:6 and 93:8.
Sources: Rashi, Rashi on Genesis 44:2:1, 44:7:1, 44:8:1, 44:10:1, 44:12:1, 44:13:1, 44:14:1, 44:15:1, 44:16:1, 44:18:1, 44:19:1, 44:20:1 and 44:22:1, the Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary by M. Rosenbaum and A. M. Silbermann, 1929 to 1934, public domain; Radak, Radak on Genesis 44:1:1, 44:3:1, 44:4:1 and 44:17:1, translated by Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash, CC-BY; Sforno, Sforno on Genesis 44:23:1, 44:24:1 and 44:25:1, translated by Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash, CC-BY; Ramban, Ramban on Genesis 44:27:1, the Commentary on the Torah by Ramban (Nachmanides), translated and annotated by Charles B. Chavel, Shilo Publishing House, New York, 1971 to 1976, CC-BY; Ibn Ezra, Ibn Ezra on Genesis 44:5:1 and 44:21:1, cited only, no English version in the corpus under a licence permitting quotation; Malbim, Malbim on Genesis 44:26:1, cited only; Midrash, Midrash Lekach Tov, Genesis 44:2:1, 44:2:2, 44:6:1, 44:21:1, 44:22:1, 44:23:1, 44:25:1, 44:26:1, 44:28:1, 44:34:1 and 41:1:1 and Exodus 9:29:1; Bereshit Rabbati, Parashat Miketz 27, 52, 53 and 54 and Parashat Vayigash 1; Midrash Sekhel Tov, Bereshit 44:5:1, 44:5:2, 44:6:1 and 44:7:1; Bereshit Rabbah 84:17, 84:20, 92:6, 92:8, 92:9 and 100:3; Aggadat Bereshit 22:2, 56:1, 61:3, 76:1 and 76:3; Midrash Aggadah, Genesis 44:4:1; Mekhilta DeRabbi Shimon Ben Yochai 14:20; Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Taanit 1:43, Ketubot 3:1 and Sotah 1:50; Ein Yaakov, Pesakhim 1:12 and Ketubbot 3:1; Genesis Rabbah 92:7, 92:8, 93:6 and 93:8 as Rashi cites them; Avot DeRabbi Natan, Avot DeRabbi Natan, Recension B 44:2; MannaFest, the annual cycle table, src/lib/hebraic/readings.ts, 2026.
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
The Silver Cup in Benjamin's Sack
Genesis 44:1-2
put each one’s silver in the mouth of his sack: The silver goes back into every sack a second time, and the ruler's own silver cup goes into the youngest one's sack. Silver had come into these men's hands once before, twenty shekels for their brother at Dothan in 37:28. The test falls on Benjamin alone, and the rest can ride home clear. The metal that convicts them is the metal they took.
Genesis 44:1
“But for what purpose was the money restored? It was done, in the first instance, from kindly feelings to his father; but another and further design seems to have been the prevention of any injurious impressions as to the character of Benjamin.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Put my cup, the silver one: Cup here is gavia, a large bowl-shaped goblet, the word used for the almond-shaped cups on the lampstand at Exodus 25:33. Joseph marks it as his own. The steward does all of it without a question.
Genesis 44:2
“Put my cup in the sack’s mouth of the youngest - The stratagem of the cup seems to have been designed to bring Joseph’s brethren into the highest state of perplexity and distress, that their deliverance by the discovery that Joseph was their brother might have its highest effect.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Genesis 44:3-4
At daybreak, the men were sent on their way: They are sent off at daybreak and overtaken before they are clear of the city. The charge Joseph puts in his steward's mouth is repaying good with evil. That is what these men did at Dothan to the brother their father had sent to find them. None of them hears it.
Genesis 44:3
“As soon as the morning was light, the men were sent away--They commenced their homeward journey at early dawn (see on Ge 18:2); and it may be readily supposed in high spirits, after so happy an issue from all their troubles and anxieties.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 more voice on this verse
Genesis 44:3
“As soon as the morning was light,.... When it was break of day, before the sun rose: the men were sent away, they and their asses; the men being refreshed with food, and their asses having provender given them, and saddled and loaded, they were handsomely and honourably dismissed.”
They had not gone far from the city: The pursuit starts while the city is still in sight, so the return is short and the whole scene plays out that morning. Joseph gives the steward his exact words to say. The good they received was the feast and the returned silver of 43:23.
Genesis 44:4
“And when they were gone out of the city, and not yet far off,.... Which perhaps was Tanis, the Zoan of the Scriptures; see Eze 30:14, margin: Joseph said unto his steward, up, follow after the men; who no doubt was ready provided with men and horses, to go out and pursue when Joseph should give the orders, he being privy to Joseph's intentions, and with whom the scheme was concerted, and the secret was.”
Genesis 44:5-6
the cup my master drinks from and uses for divination?: The steward's words name the silver cup as the one his master drinks from and uses for divination. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown take it as ordinary Egyptian cup divination, spoken by a man playing an Egyptian lord to the hilt. Adam Clarke reads the Hebrew verb in its wider sense of looking closely, and holds that no sorcery is claimed of Joseph. Genesis reports the words and stops there.
Genesis 44:5
“Is not this it in which my lord drinketh--not only kept for the governor's personal use, but whereby he divines. Divination by cups, to ascertain the course of futurity, was one of the prevalent superstitions of ancient Egypt, as it is of Eastern countries still.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 more voice on this verse
Genesis 44:5
“Whereby - he divineth? - Divination by cups has been from time immemorial prevalent among the Asiatics; and for want of knowing this, commentators have spent a profusion of learned labor upon these words, in order to reduce them to that kind of meaning which would at once be consistent with the scope and design of the history, and save Joseph from the impeachment of sorcery and divination. I take the word נחש nachash here in its general acceptation of to view attentively, to inquire.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
he relayed these words to them: The steward repeats Joseph's words exactly, and the brothers hear an accusation they know to be false. Once they had set a false story before their father over a torn robe at 37:32. Now the false charge falls on them.
Genesis 44:6
“And he overtook them,.... Their asses being laden with corn could not travel very fast, and he and his attendants being mounted on swift horses: and he spake unto them these same words; that Joseph had ordered him to say, and so what follows particularly, Gen 44:10.”
Genesis 44:7-9
Their answer is confident, and a fact stands behind it, the silver they brought back from Canaan themselves. Then they swear past their knowledge and offer death for the man who has the cup and slavery for the rest. Jacob had sworn the same way when Laban searched the tents for his gods, and Rachel had them, at 31:32. This search ends at Rachel's other son.
Genesis 44:7
“And they said unto him, wherefore saith my lord these words?.... One of them, in the name of the rest, perhaps Judah, made answer, as astonished at the charge laid against them, suggesting that there was not the least foundation for it, and were quite surprised to hear anything of this kind alleged against them: God forbid that thy servants should do according to this thing; expressing the utmost detestation of such a fact, as being what they could never be guilty of.”
Why would we steal silver or gold from your master’s house?: Silver or gold widens the denial past the cup to anything of value in the house. Honest dealing over money is the ground they stand on. Their proof is the returned silver of 43:21, which the steward himself received.
Genesis 44:8
“Behold, the money which we found in our sacks mouths;....”
The brothers offer themselves as slaves, the fate they handed Joseph at Dothan. Their own mouths set the penalty, and the steward softens it in verse 10. Each man is certain the cup is elsewhere.
Genesis 44:10-11
only the one who is found with the cup will be my slave: The steward softens the terms the brothers had offered, one man a slave and the rest free of blame. The softened terms leave eleven brothers free to walk home without the twelfth, which is the shape of the test. Each man lowers his sack to the ground and opens it. John Calvin notes the moderation in the steward, who asks less than the brothers had offered.
So each one quickly lowered his sack to the ground: Quickly marks their confidence, men eager to prove the steward's charge false. Every sack lies open on the ground. The search runs from the oldest to the youngest, and their haste makes the finding of the cup in verse 12 fall harder.
Genesis 44:11
“Then they speedily took down every man his sack to the ground,.... To be opened and examined, and this they did in all haste, as having a clear conscience, and being confident that nothing could be found upon them, and desirous of having the affair issued as soon as possible, that the steward might have full satisfaction, and they proceed on in their journey: and opened every man his sack; showing neither reluctance nor fear, being conscious of their innocence.”
Genesis 44:12-13
The search runs from the oldest down to the youngest, so the last sack opened is the one with the cup. They tore their clothes, which is what Reuben did at the empty pit and what their father did over the bloodied coat. The steward's terms let them go home without Benjamin. Every man loads his donkey and returns to the city with him.
Genesis 44:12
“The sacks of the brothers are first examined according to the order of age of each brother. God's Scripture is teaching you a moral lesson. Previously they sat at the banquet in Joseph's presence in order of age from the firstborn. You see that the place of honor is to be given to the eldest. On the other hand, the sacks of each are searched in order of age so that you may know that Paul has been chosen by the judgment of heaven. The rest were examined, but this man was given the preference.”
Ambrose of Milan · written before 397 · On Joseph the Patriarchpatristic
Then they all tore their clothes: Torn clothes were the mourner's sign in Canaan, and 37:34 records Jacob doing the same over Joseph. Here all eleven tear together, the first grief they share for a brother. They all includes men who were free to go.
Hauled Back Before Joseph
Genesis 44:14-15
they fell to the ground before him: The text names Judah first and his brothers after him, ahead of Reuben the firstborn. They fall to the ground before him for the third time in three chapters. Joseph asks what deed this is and says a man like him can surely divine. He is still the Egyptian they take him for.
Divine is nachash, the verb Laban used at 30:27 when he claimed to learn by divination that the LORD had blessed him through Jacob. Joseph speaks of his cup and his brothers' deed as an Egyptian lord would. The law later forbids divining to Israel at Leviticus 19:26.
Genesis 44:15
“And Joseph said unto them, what deed is this ye have done?....”
Genesis 44:16-17
God has exposed the iniquity of your servants: Judah says nothing about the cup. What he confesses is the iniquity God has exposed, and Ephrem the Syrian read that as the pit and the sale of more than twenty years before. Joseph sets the terms himself, the man with the cup stays as his slave. The rest may return to their father in peace.
Genesis 44:16
“Then Judah said, "Before God the sins of your servants have been discovered"—not this one [of the cup] but the one for which we have been requited with these things.”
Ephrem the Syrian · written before 373 · COMMENTARY ON GENESIS 38:4patristic
1 more voice on this verse
Genesis 44:16
“What shall we say, etc. - No words can more strongly mark confusion and perturbation of mind. They, no doubt, all thought that Benjamin had actually stolen the cup; and the probability of this guilt might be heightened by the circumstance of his having that very cup to drink out of at dinner; for as he had the most honorable mess, so it is likely he had the most honorable cup to drink out of at the entertainment.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Far be it from me renders chalilah, the protest Abraham raised before the LORD at 18:25 over judging the righteous with the wicked. Joseph uses it to claim justice for himself, punishing the guilty man alone. The offer leaves ten brothers free to abandon Benjamin.
Judah Offers Himself as Slave
let your servant speak personally to my lord: The longest speech any man makes in Genesis begins here and runs to seventeen verses. Judah asks to speak a word into the lord's own ear, and he sets him level with Pharaoh before he begins. Adam Clarke called it a specimen of natural eloquence. The cup never comes up in it again.
Genesis 44:18
“Thou art even as Pharaoh - As wise, as powerful, and as much to be dreaded as he. In the Asiatic countries, the reigning monarch is always considered to be the pattern of all perfection; and the highest honor that can be conferred on any person, is to resemble him to the monarch; as the monarch himself is likened, in the same complimentary way, to an angel of God. See 2Sa 14:17, 2Sa 14:18. Judah is the chief speaker here, because it was in consequence of his becoming surety for Benjamin that Jacob permitted him to accompany them to Egypt.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Genesis 44:19-20
Judah gives their old answer back in fuller words than chapter 42 recorded. Three things are new here, the child of his old age, the brother who is dead, and a father who loves the boy. The love is the fact Judah wants in front of the man holding Benjamin. He is his mother's only son left.
Genesis 44:19
“My lord asked his servants,.... The first time they came down to Egypt to buy corn; he puts him in mind of what passed between them at that time: saying, have ye a father or a brother? which question followed upon their saying that they were the sons of one man, Gen 42:11.”
the child of his old age: Joseph was the son born to Jacob in his old age at 37:3, and now that place in the father's heart belongs to Benjamin. Judah describes the favour calmly, without the envy of chapter 37. The man hearing it was its first object.
Genesis 44:21-23
Judah quotes the lord's own demand back to him, that the boy be brought down so the man could see him. John Gill points out that the threat of verse 23 stands nowhere in the account of the first meeting in chapter 42. Chapter 43 already showed that Jacob's sons had carried the threat home to their father. The speech fills in what the story left out.
In Hebrew the verse says that if he leaves his father he will die, and the pronoun could point to either man. The Berean reads it of the father, the sense Judah makes plain in verse 31. This exchange stands only in Judah's retelling.
Genesis 44:22
“And we said unto my lord, the lad cannot leave his father,.... That is, his father will not be willing to part with him: for if he should leave his father, his father would die; with grief and trouble, fearing some evil was befallen him, and he should see him no more.”
Judah quotes back the one sentence that put the whole family's bread in Benjamin's hands. He had quoted it to his father at 43:3, and now he quotes it to the man who said it. The speech holds the lord to his own words.
Genesis 44:23
“And thou saidst unto thy servants,.... In answer to the representation of things made by them, and notwithstanding that: except your youngest brother come down with you, you shall see my face no more; which though not before related in the discourse, which passed between Joseph and his brethren, in express terms, yet might be justly inferred from what he said; nay, might be expressed in so many words, though not recorded, and as it seems plainly it was, as appears from Gen 43:3.”
Genesis 44:24-26
Now when we returned to your servant my father: The return home is told in three lines, the words relayed, the food gone, and the father saying go back and buy. Judah lets the famine do the arguing, and hunger is what moved the old man to let Benjamin go. Their own answer had been flat. They could not go down at all unless the younger brother went with them.
Genesis 44:24
“And it came to pass, when we came unto thy servant my father,.... In the land of Canaan: we told him the words of my lord; what he had said to them, particularly respecting Benjamin.”
Judah repeats his father's words from 43:2 almost exactly. The father's first thought was grain, with Benjamin left out of it. Telling that to the ruler lets him see a household driven by hunger.
Genesis 44:25
“And our father said,.... After some time, when the corn was almost consumed they had bought in Egypt: go again, and buy us a little food; that may suffice fill the famine is over; see Gen 43:1.”
Judah tells the ruler of the argument in the family, sons refusing their father. The refusal was Judah's own at 43:5. Obeying the lord of Egypt had become the only way to feed their father.
Genesis 44:27-28
Jacob counts two sons when he has twelve, and the ten men listening grew up under that arithmetic. John Gill notes that the wife he means is Rachel, whom he served fourteen years for. Judah then repeats his father's verdict on Joseph, surely he has been torn to pieces. He knows whose hands dipped the coat.
Genesis 44:27
“And thy servant my father said unto us,.... When thus pressed to let Benjamin go with them: ye know that my wife bare me two sons; Rachel, by whom he had Joseph and Benjamin, and whom he calls his wife, she being his only lawful wife; Leah was imposed upon him, Gen 29:20; and the other two were concubines, Gen 30:4.”
Torn to pieces doubles the Hebrew verb taraf, the same words Jacob cried over the robe at 37:33. The verb returns at 49:27, where Jacob calls Benjamin a ravenous wolf. Twenty years on, the grief still speaks in the present tense.
Genesis 44:29-31
The gray hair going down to Sheol is said twice here, once in Jacob's words and once in Judah's own reckoning. Judah has watched for twenty years what the first loss did to the old man. His father's life, he tells the lord, is wrapped up in the boy's life. It is the nearest Genesis comes to naming the loss.
Genesis 44:29
“And if ye take this also from me,.... His son Benjamin, as he perhaps suspected they had taken Joseph, and made away with him: and mischief befall him; either in Egypt, or on the road, going or returning, any ill accident, especially death, as the Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan, or what may issue in it: ye shall bring my gray hairs with sorrow to the grave; it would be the means of his death, and while he lived he should be full of sorrow and grief; see Gen 42:38.”
whose life is wrapped up in the boy’s life: Wrapped up renders qashar, to bind or tie, the verb 1 Samuel 18:1 uses for the bond of Jonathan's life to David's. Judah pictures two lives tied in a single knot. Cut the boy away, and the father goes with him.
he will die: Judah makes the brothers answerable for the death he foresees, naming your servants as the ones who bring it about. At Dothan they brought grief on the same father and hid their part. This time they own the outcome before it happens.
your servant guaranteed the boy’s safety to my father: Judah quotes his own promise from 43:9 word for word, the one sentence of his own that he brings into the plea. He had guaranteed the boy's safety and agreed to bear the guilt before his father all his life. The whole speech rests on that one word. Adam Clarke notes that the guarantee was given before Jacob would let the boy leave home.
Genesis 44:32
“For thy servant became surety for the lad unto my father,.... Which is another argument used for the release of Benjamin, though he should be detained for him, which he offers to be: saying, if I bring him not unto thee, then I shall bear the blame unto my father for ever; See Gill on Gen 43:9.”
Genesis 44:33-34
let your servant stay here as my lord’s slave in place of the boy: Judah asks to stay as a slave in Benjamin's place so the boy can go back to his father. The same man had asked what profit there was in killing a brother and had proposed the sale at 37:26. He now offers himself for the other son of Rachel. Matthew Henry reads the offer as a figure of Christ standing in the room of the guilty, and Christ came from Judah's tribe.
Genesis 44:33
“Judah's faithful adherence to Benjamin, now in his distress, was recompensed long after by the constant adherence of the tribe of Benjamin to the tribe of Judah, when all the other ten tribes deserted it. How fitly does the apostle, when he is discoursing of the mediation of Christ, observe, that our Lord sprang out of Judah ( Heb. vii.”
Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Judah had watched his father refuse all comfort for Joseph at 37:35. He cannot face that grief a second time. Joseph breaks down at the next words, in 45:1.
Genesis 44:34
“For how shall I go up to my father, and the lad be not with me?....”
How this psalm is built
The form: Narrative, the last test, ending in a speech of seventeen verses, as Clarke classes it.
The patterns in this chapter
| Device | What it does | Where to see it |
|---|---|---|
| The search from the oldest to the youngest | Verse 12 has the steward searching in order of age, beginning with the oldest and ending with the youngest, so the cup comes out of Benjamin's sack last and the ten watch it happen one sack at a time. Matthew Henry notes that they tore their clothes at the sight, which is what Reuben did at the empty pit at 37:29 and what their father did over the bloodied robe at 37:34.Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on Genesis 44:13. | Genesis 44:12, Genesis 44:13 |
| My gray hair down to Sheol in sorrow | Judah puts the sentence in his father's mouth at verse 29 and then in his own reckoning at verse 31, and Jacob had already said it at 42:38 when he refused to let Benjamin go. Said three times across two chapters, it is the thing Judah is arguing against rather than the thing he fears for himself.John Calvin, Commentaries, 1554, on Genesis 44:30. | Genesis 44:29, Genesis 44:31, Genesis 42:38 |
| The pledge quoted back word for word | At verse 32 Judah repeats the promise he made at 43:9, that he stood surety for the boy and agreed to bear the guilt before his father all his life. Adam Clarke notes that the guarantee was given before Jacob would let the boy leave home, so the whole speech rests on a word Judah gave in Canaan to a father who is not in the room.Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on Genesis 44:32. | Genesis 44:32, Genesis 43:9 |
| Please, my lord, let your servant speak | The longest speech any man makes in Genesis begins at verse 18 and runs to verse 34. Judah asks to speak a word personally and sets the man level with Pharaoh before he starts, and Adam Clarke calls the speech a specimen of natural eloquence. The cup that caused the arrest is never mentioned in it once.Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on Genesis 44:18. | Genesis 44:18, Genesis 44:34 |
The debated concept
7 more paragraphs on the patterns
Whether Joseph practised divination is the chapter's hard question. The steward says at verse 5 that his master drinks from the cup and uses it for divination, and Joseph says at verse 15 that a man like him can surely divine. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown read both lines as ordinary Egyptian cup divination, which a governor of Egypt would be expected to use. Adam Clarke reads the Hebrew verb in its wider sense of observing closely and takes the claim as part of the Egyptian character Joseph is keeping up. A third reading takes the words as the steward's script and Joseph's bluff, written to frighten men who already believe they are dealing with an Egyptian magistrate. Genesis reports the words and passes no judgment on them, and the same book gives Joseph's own account of his readings at 40:8 and 41:16, that interpretation belongs to God.
What Judah is confessing at verse 16 is disputed in the same way. Ephrem the Syrian takes the iniquity God has exposed to be the sale of Joseph. Matthew Henry reads the confession as the brothers accepting the judgment without knowing which sin it answers. On either reading Judah does not defend Benjamin against the charge of theft, which is what the speech that follows makes plain.
How the rest of Scripture reads this chapter
Matthew Henry reads Judah's offer at verses 33 and 34 as a figure of Christ standing in the room of the guilty. The claim rests on a fact the New Testament states: Hebrews 7:14 says that our Lord descended from Judah, and Hebrews 7:22 gives Jesus the standing Judah took at 43:9, the guarantee of a better covenant. Genesis 49:8 to 10 will give this same Judah the rule over his brothers and the scepter until Shiloh comes.
The divine connection
The chapter is the one place in the account where the brothers are shown their old sin by being offered it again. The circumstances are arranged to the last detail, the favoured son, the condemnation, the open road, and what the men do is the measure of what has changed in them since chapter 37. Joseph learns from their answer what no test of grain or silver could have told him.
Judah's own change is the plainest thing in the chapter. He proposed the sale at 37:26 for twenty shekels of silver, and here he offers to spend his life as a slave in Egypt so that his father does not lose a second son of Rachel.
Keep studying
Studies1
Places1
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The form and classifications
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, on Genesis 44:18; Ephrem the Syrian, Commentary on Genesis, on Genesis 44:16; John Calvin, Commentaries, 1554, on Genesis 44:10 and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, on Genesis 44:33.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Chuck Missler, The Book of Genesis; Ephrem the Syrian, Commentary on Genesis; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Calvin, Commentary on Genesis; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
