Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.
The Sermon on the Mount
The Sermon on the Mount, Carl Bloch, 1877. Public domain.

Matthewchapter 2

23 verses · Matthew, by tradition · AD 50 to 65 · The Gospels

After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, during the time of King Herod, Magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem,

Introduction

Matthew, by tradition, The Gospels, Matthew Overview.

This chapter moves the story out of a single household and onto the stage of kings and nations. Matthew writes for readers who knew what kind of man Herod the Great had been and what a rival claimant could expect from him. The chapter sets two responses to one child side by side. Listen for who comes looking and who stays at home with the Scriptures open. Listen also for the way each move of the family is tied to a line of the prophets, so that the child relives the history of His people from Egypt onward.

Context

Who
Jewish readers who knew Herod's reputation firsthand
What
The visit of the Magi, the flight into Egypt, the killing of the boys of Bethlehem and the family's settlement in Nazareth.
Where
Jerusalem and Herod's court, the village of Bethlehem in Judea, the land of Egypt, and finally Nazareth in Galilee.
When
About 5 to 4 BC, with the return from Egypt soon after the death of Herod the Great, which is usually dated to 4 BC.
Why
To show that the king of the Jews was sought by Gentiles and opposed by Israel's own ruler, and that each step of His early life fulfilled Scripture.

Historical context

The magi were not kings and the text never numbers them. The word describes a priestly class of scholars from the east, Persia or Babylon, who studied the stars, interpreted dreams, and advised royal courts. A large Jewish community had lived in Babylon since the exile, so Hebrew prophecy was known in that world.

Show the rest of the historical context, 3 more paragraphs

Herod the Great was a client king: Rome let him rule Judea so long as he kept it quiet and paid up. He was a spectacular builder and a murderous paranoid. Josephus records that he executed his wife Mariamne and three of his own sons on suspicion of plotting. Killing the infants of a small village fits everything else known about him.

Bethlehem was a village of perhaps a few hundred people. The number of boys under two would have been small, a dozen or so, which is why no Roman historian bothered to record it. It was one more local cruelty in a reign full of them.

Egypt was the obvious refuge. It lay outside Herod's jurisdiction, the journey was well travelled, and Alexandria held one of the largest Jewish populations in the world. On the return, Matthew notes that Herod's son Archelaus held Judea, a ruler so brutal that Rome removed him in AD 6, which is exactly why the family settled north in Galilee instead.

Significance

A Jewish reader would feel the pattern immediately: a wicked king killing infant boys, a child preserved, a return out of Egypt. Matthew is putting Jesus where Moses stood, and behind Moses, Israel itself.

Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph

There is a sting in it, too. Foreign stargazers travelled for months to worship him; the chief priests could quote the right verse about Bethlehem without walking the six miles to look. Matthew's readers, pushed out by their own leaders, were being told the pattern started early.

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

Wise Men Follow the Star to the Child

Matthew 2:1-2

Magi from the east: The Magi were priestly astronomers of the East. Daniel 2:48 had set a Jew over the wise men of Babylon, and Numbers 24:17 spoke of a star out of Jacob. The first to seek him are Gentiles, asking "Where is the One who has been born King of the Jews?"

Matthew 2:1

“We think the Evangelist first wrote, as we read in the Hebrew, 'Judah,' not 'Judæa.' For in what other country is there a Bethlehem, that this needs to be distinguished as in 'Judæa?' But 'Judah' is written, because there is another Bethlehem in Galilee. They knew that such a star would rise by the prophecy of Balaam, whose successors they were. But whether they were Chaldæans, or Persians, or came from the utmost ends of the earth, how in so short a space of time could they arrive at Jerusalem?”

Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

3 more voices on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.

Matthew 2:1

“It lay to the east of Judea, and was famous for gold, frankincense, and myrrh. We have seen his star - Undoubtedly they had before heard Balaam's prophecy. And probably when they saw this unusual star, it was revealed to them that this prophecy was fulfilled.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

Matthew 2:1

“It is not known who these wise men were. Their names and dwelling-place are alike kept back from us. We are only told that they came “from the east.” Whether they were Chaldeans or Arabians we cannot say. Whether they learned to expect Christ from the ten tribes who went into captivity, or from the prophecies of Daniel, we do not know. It matters little who they were. The point which concerns us most is the rich instruction which their history conveys.”

Matthew 2:1

“That truth that is tradition has wisely remembered them almost as unknown quantities, as mysterious as their mysterious and melodious names: Melchior, Caspar, Balthazar.”

The whole record on this verse →

The title King of the Jews is how outsiders speak. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown compare it with the words of Pilate in John 18:33 and of the soldiers at 27:29. John Gill notes that the magi doubt neither the birth nor the kingship and ask only where he is.

Matthew 2:2

“We have seen his star - Having discovered an unusual luminous appearance or meteor in the heavens, supposing these persons to have been Jews, and knowing the prophecies relative to the redemption of Israel, they probably considered this to be the star mentioned by Balaam, Num 24:17. See the note there. In the east - Εν τη ανατολη, At its rise. Ανατολη and δυσμη are used in the New Testament for east and west. To worship him - Or, To do him homage; προσκυνησαι αυτω.”

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 2:2

“Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews?--From this it would seem they were not themselves Jews. (Compare the language of the Roman governor, Joh 18:33, and of the Roman soldiers, Mt 27:29, with the very different language of the Jews themselves, Mt 27:42, &c.).”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

ConnectionsNumbers 24:17

Matthew 2:3-4

he was disturbed: Herod "was disturbed, and all Jerusalem with him," so the city of the great King shakes at news that her King is born. Herod was an Idumean on a contested throne, and Jerusalem had reason to fear him, since his jealousy had already killed a wife and sons.

Matthew 2:3

“When Herod the king had heard these things, he was troubled--viewing this as a danger to his own throne: perhaps his guilty conscience also suggested other grounds of fear. and all Jerusalem with him--from a dread of revolutionary commotions, and perhaps also of Herod's rage.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 2:3

“He could not be a stranger to the prophecies of the Old Testament, concerning the Messiah and his kingdom, and the times fixed for his appearing by Daniel's weeks; but, having himself reigned so long and so successfully, he began to hope that those promises would for ever fail, and that his kingdom would be established and perpetuated in spite of them.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Matthew 2:3

“Had heard these things - Had heard of their coming, and of the star, and of the design of their coming. He was troubled - Herod had obtained the kingdom by great crimes, and by shedding much blood. He was therefore easily alarmed by any remarkable appearances; and the fact that this star appeared, and that it was regarded as proof that a King of the Jews was born, alarmed him. Besides, it was a common expectation that the Messiah was about to appear, and he feared that his reign was about to come to an end.”

The whole record on this verse →

all the chief priests and scribes of the people: Adam Clarke counts among the chief priests former high priests and the heads of the twenty-four priestly courses. Albert Barnes calls the scribes the nation's lawyers and record keepers. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown observe that Herod called the authorized interpreters of Scripture because he wanted an answer from prophecy.

Matthew 2:4

“As MEYER says, it was all the theologians of the nation whom Herod convened, because it was a theological response that he wanted. he demanded of them--as the authorized interpreters of Scripture. where Christ--the Messiah. should be born--according to prophecy.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 2:4

“Moreover, to add to the measure of their damnation, Him whom they despise now that He is born, they knew long beforehand would be born. And they knew not only that He would be born, but also where He would be born.”

Gregory the Dialogist · written before 604 · Forty Gospel Homilies, Homily 10patristic

The whole record on this verse →

Matthew 2:5-6

The scribes answer from Micah 5:2, the one fulfillment citation spoken by Israel's own teachers. The Hebrew calls Bethlehem small among the clans of Judah. The citation turns the point, "by no means least among the rulers of Judah," the town least in size greatest in what it gives.

Matthew 2:5

“And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judea--a prompt and involuntary testimony from the highest tribunal; which yet at length condemned Him to die. for thus it is written by the prophet-- (Mic 5:2).”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 2:5

“By the prophet - The Sanhedrin answered without hesitation. The question where he would be born had been settled by prophecy. This prophecy is found in Mic 5:2. In that prophecy both the place of his birth and the character of the Messiah are so clearly set forth that there was no room to doubt. It will be observed that there is a considerable difference between the passage as quoted by the Sanhedrin and as it stands in Micah. The main point, however, is retained - the place of his birth.”

The whole record on this verse →

Bethlehem, in the land of Judah: The words in the land of Judah set this town apart from the other Bethlehem, which Adam Clarke places in Zebulun from Joshua 19:15. Chrysostom notes that the ruler comes out of Bethlehem. He adds that the words cannot mean Zerubbabel, who was born in Babylon.

Matthew 2:6

“For thus it is written in the prophet: "And thou, Bethlehem, are not the least in the leaders of Judah: for out of thee shall issue a Leader who shall feed my People lsrµl." But if hitherto he has not been born, what "leader" was it who was thus announced as to proceed from the tribe of Judah, out of Bethlehem? For it behoves him to proceed from the tribe of Judah and from Bethlehem.”

Tertullian · written before 220 · An Answer to the Jewspatristic

4 more voices on this verse

Matthew 2:6

“And thou Bethlehem in the land of Juda,.... This prophecy, which the chief priests and scribes produced, as pointing at the place of Christ's birth, is owned by both ancient and later Jews (y) to be a prophecy of the Messiah. The difference between Micah and Matthew is easily reconciled. Bethlehem is called by Micah, Bethlehem Ephratah, and by Matthew, Bethlehem in the land of Judah, and both were one and the same place.”

Matthew 2:6

“And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda - To distinguish it from Bethlehem, in the tribe of Zebulon. Jos 19:15. See on Mat 2:1 (note). Art not the least - In Mic 5:2, it is read, Though thou be little - צעיר להיות tsdir lehayoth, little to be. Houbigant, struck with the oddness of the construction of the Hebrew, by dividing the last word, and making a small change in two of the letters, makes the prophet agree with the evangelist, צעיר לא היית ,tsilegna tsdir lo hayita, thou art not the least.”

Matthew 2:6

“The classical writers use the same figure. The pastoral rule of Jehovah and Messiah over His people is a representation pervading all Scripture, and rich in import. That this prophecy of Micah referred to the Messiah, was admitted by the ancient Rabbins.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

Matthew 2:6

“When this and several other quotations from the Old Testament are compared with the original, it plainly appears, the apostles did not always think it necessary exactly to transcribe the passages they cited, but contented themselves with giving the general sense, though with some diversity of language.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

The whole record on this verse →

ConnectionsMicah 5:2

Matthew 2:7-8

Herod called the Magi secretly: y," since a public inquiry would have sent the council to Bethlehem. He dresses murder as devotion: "so that I too may go and worship Him." The time he learns returns at verse 16 as the measure of the massacre, boys of two years and under.

Matthew 2:7

“Privily - Secretly, privately. He did this to ascertain the time when Jesus was born. Diligently - Accurately, exactly. He took pains to learn the precise time when the star appeared. He did this because he naturally concluded that the star appeared just at the time of his birth, and he wished to know precisely how old the child was.”

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 2:7

“It wasn't the words of the magi that troubled Herod. It was the speculations of the legal experts about the words of the believing prophets. For the magi were seeking a king, but the Jews were declaring that Christ had been born. For this reason, turning aside the magi, Herod calls the Jews and asks them where the Christ should be born, he "whom you, having heard the magi, are now announcing." This is how the enemies of the truth may sometimes unwillingly speak the truth. They interpret the whole prophecy uselessly, failing to grasp what is necessary.”

Cyril of Alexandria · written before 444 · FRAGMENT 10.3patristic

Matthew 2:7

“Herod was now an old man, and had reigned thirty-five years; this king was but newly born, and not likely to enterprise any thing considerable for many years; yet Herod is jealous of him.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse →

Chrysostom calls the plan folly. Asking in secret was enough to warn the magi of his craft, and Herod speaks of a Child where they had spoken of a king. Albert Barnes observes that Herod already knew the time and the place and wanted the magi to see the Child.

Matthew 2:8

“That I may come and worship him also - See Mat 2:2, and on Gen 17:3 (note), and Exo 4:31 (note). What exquisite hypocrisy was here! he only wished to find out the child that he might murder him; but see how that God who searches the heart prevents the designs of wicked men from being accomplished!”

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 2:8

Herod treats the magi as ambassadors. For after a certain manner, they had come to the King of Israel in order to intercede that there might be peace between them and the Israelites. They hoped that, for Gentiles and Jews alike, there might be "one fold, one shepherd."

Cyril of Alexandria · written before 444 · FRAGMENT 10patristic

The whole record on this verse →

Matthew 2:9-10

the star they had seen: The star "went ahead of them until it stood over the place where the Child was," wording that no conjunction or comet fits. Chrysostom points out that no star moves south from Jerusalem to Bethlehem. The text leaves the means unstated and states the gladness: "they rejoiced with great delight."

Matthew 2:9

“They who follow God in the dark shall find that light is sown, is reserved, for them. Israel was led by a pillar of fire to the promised land, the wise men by a star to the promised Seed, who is himself the bright and morning Star, Rev. xxii. God would rather create a new thing than leave those at a loss who diligently and faithfully sought him.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

When they saw the star: John Gill thinks the magi recognized this as the same star they had seen in their own country. He reads the doubled joy as a Hebrew emphasis. He adds that they had likely been discouraged after so long a road with so little to show for it.

Matthew 2:10

“When they saw the star,.... Which by its appearance, size, brightness, &c. they knew to be the same with that which they had seen, when in their own country; they rejoiced with exceeding great joy; a "pleonasm" or a redundancy of expression frequently used by the Hebrews, see Joh 4:6 and the Septuagint there; setting forth the rapture, the excess of joy they were in upon the sight of the star. Very probably before this, their hearts were sad, their countenances dejected, and they greatly discouraged, having taken so great a journey, and as yet to so little purpose.”

Matthew 2:11-12

gold and frankincense and myrrh: Gold, frankincense and myrrh were gifts of homage for an eastern court. From Irenaeus onward the church read them as gold for a king, frankincense for God and myrrh for one appointed to die. Then, "warned in a dream not to return to Herod," the Magi go "by another route."

Matthew 2:11

“And when they were come into the house,.... Which they entered without making any inquiry, being fully assured by the star's standing right over it, that this was the house, and here was the king of the Jews, whom they were come to worship; and having entered in "they saw" some copies read ευρον, they found the young child, with Mary his mother; in her lap, or arms, or in the house with her, for by this time he might go alone.”

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 2:11

“They presented to him gifts - It was customary to offer some present to any eminent person whom they visited. And so it is, as travelers observe, in the eastern countries to this day.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

The whole record on this verse →

ConnectionsPsalms 72:1

warned in a dream not to return to Herod: Jerome notes that the Greek word means they received an answer, and he takes it to come from the Lord himself without an angel. Matthew Henry notes that they never promised to return. Chrysostom praises them for obeying without asking why a child of such greatness needed a secret escape.

Matthew 2:12

“Warned of God - This was done, doubtless, because, if they had given Herod precise information where he was, it would have been easy for him to send forth and kill him. And from this we learn that God will watch over those whom He loves; that He knows how to foil the purposes of the wicked, and to deliver His own out of the hands of those who would destroy them. In a dream - See the note at Mat 1:20.”

Flight into Egypt by Night

Matthew 2:13-15

flee to Egypt: The command to "flee to Egypt" reverses the oldest road in Israel's memory. Verse 15 names the reversal: "Out of Egypt I called My Son." In Hosea 11:1 the son is Israel in the exodus, and Matthew applies it to Jesus, the true Israel, who comes out at God's call.

Matthew 2:13

“And when they were departed,.... That is immediately, or as soon as they were gone, or in a very little time after, probably the same night, behold, the Angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream; it is very likely the same angel who appeared to him in such sort, Mat 1:20 "saying arise", awake out of sleep, and rise from thy bed directly, and take the young child and his mother. The angel does not say take thy wife and son; for though Mary was properly his wife, yet Christ was not properly his son.”

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 2:13

“The angel appeareth to Joseph in a dream - See Mat 1:20. Flee into Egypt - Egypt is situated to the southwest of Judea, and is distant from Bethlehem perhaps about 60 miles. It was at this time a Roman province. There were many Jews there, who had a temple and synagogues (see the notes at Isa 19:18), and Joseph, therefore, would be among his own countrymen, and yet beyond the reach of Herod. The jurisdiction of Herod extended only to the River Sihon, or “river of Egypt,” and, of course, beyond that Joseph was safe from his designs.”

Matthew 2:13

“To "the house of bondage?" Well, it once was that. But Egypt was a house of refuge before it was a house of bondage, and now it has but returned to its first use. and be thou there until I bring thee word; for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him--Herod's murderous purpose was formed before the Magi had reached Bethlehem.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

by night, and withdrew to Egypt: Albert Barnes reads the night departure as prompt obedience that hid the family from pursuit. Charles Spurgeon recalls that Egypt had often sheltered the seed of Abraham, from Abraham in the famine to Joseph and the family of Jacob. Hilary of Poitiers notes that the land was full of idols.

Matthew 2:14

“When he arose, he took the young child and his mother,.... That is, as soon as he awoke out of sleep, and rose from his bed, he did as he was commanded, he prepared for his journey; and very opportunely had the wise men presented their gifts; the gold they brought served to defray the expense of this journey, and which no doubt was so ordered by divine providence for this purpose.”

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 2:14

“Egypt full of idols; for after this enquiry for Him among the Jews, Christ leaving Judæa goes to be cherished among nations given to the vainest superstitions.”

Hilary of Poitiers · written before 367 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

Matthew 2:14

“EGYPT occupies a very singular position towards Israel. It was often the shelter of the seed of Abraham. Abraham, himself, went there when there was a famine in the land of his sojourn. To Egypt, Joseph was taken that he might escape from the death intended for him by his envious brothers and become the stepfather of the house of Israel. Into Egypt, as we all right well know, went the whole family of Jacob—and there they sojourned in a strange land. There Moses acquired the learning which was so useful to him.”

The whole record on this verse →

until the death of Herod: Matthew follows the Hebrew of Hosea, where the Greek version read children in the plural, as Jerome and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown observe. John Gill, drawing on Eusebius and Lightfoot, puts the stay at no more than three or four months. Albert Barnes holds that the time cannot be fixed.

Matthew 2:15

“And was there until the death of Herod,.... Which was in a very short time; for Eusebius (i) says, that immediately, in a very little time after the slaughter of the children at Bethlehem, the divine vengeance inflicted diseases on him, which quickly brought him to his end; so that, according to the learned Dr. Lightfoot (k), Jesus was not above three or four months in Egypt.”

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 2:15

“The death of Herod - Herod died in the thirty-seventh year of his reign. It is not certainly known in what year he began his reign, and hence it is impossible to determine the time that Joseph remained in Egypt. The best chronologers have supposed that he died somewhere between two and four years after the birth of Christ, but at what particular time cannot now be determined. Nor can it be ascertained at what age Jesus was taken into Egypt.”

Matthew 2:15

“Out of Egypt have I called my son--Our Evangelist here quotes directly from the Hebrew, warily departing from the Septuagint, which renders the words, "From Egypt have I recalled his children," meaning Israel's children.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

Cross references

Matthew 2:15

Herod Kills the Children of Bethlehem

Matthew 2:16-18

put to death all the boys: Bethlehem was a village, so perhaps ten to thirty boys died, and the deed fits the man Josephus records killing his sons. Matthew hears Jeremiah 31:15 and writes "what was spoken through the prophet Jeremiah was fulfilled," where elsewhere events happen to fulfill the word. God never purposes the crime.

Matthew 2:16

“Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked,.... Herod, having waited a proper time for the return of the wise men, and they not coming, concluded he was tricked by them; though, no doubt, when they promised to return, and bring him word how things were, they seriously meant and designed a performance; but having met with a divine oracle, which ordered them another way, they thought it most advisable to obey God rather than man.”

3 more voices on this verse

Matthew 2:16

“Slew all the children - This cruelty of Herod seems alluded to in very decisive terms by Macrobius, who flourished toward the conclusion of the fourth Century.”

Matthew 2:16

“But (we hold the contrary): for Christ, by "accepting praise out of the mouth of babes and sucklings," has declared that neither childhood nor infancy is without sensibility, -the former of which states, when meeting Him with approving shouts, proved its ability to offer Him testimony; while the other, by being slaughtered, for His sake of course, knew what violence meant.”

Tertullian · written before 220 · A Treatise on the Soulpatristic

Matthew 2:16

“The diseases and deaths of little children are proofs of original sin. But we must look upon this murder of the infants under another character: it was their martyrdom. How early did persecution commence against Christ and his kingdom!”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse →

spoken through the prophet Jeremiah: John Wesley and Albert Barnes take the word fulfilled here in a wide sense, meaning that Jeremiah's words fit the event with great aptness. John Gill reads the prophecy as belonging to the days of the Messiah. Jerome notes that Matthew follows neither Hebrew nor Greek wording.

Matthew 2:17

“Then was fulfilled - The word “fulfilled,” here. is used evidently in the sense that the words in Jeremiah aptly express the event which Matthew was recording. Compare the notes at Mat 1:22. That which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet - Jeremiah. This quotation is taken from Jer 31:15. The original design of the prophecy was to describe the sorrowful departure of the people of Israel into captivity after the conquest of Jerusalem by Nebuzaradan.”

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 2:17

“Then was fulfilled - A passage of Scripture, whether prophetic, historical, or poetical, is in the language of the New Testament fulfilled, when an event happens to which it may with great propriety be accommodated.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

The whole record on this verse →

Cross references

Matthew 2:17

Ramah lay in Benjamin, ten or twelve miles from Bethlehem by Albert Barnes's reckoning, and its name means a height. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown see Rachel, buried near Bethlehem, lamenting twice, once for a bitter captivity and now for a bloody death. John Wesley pictures her risen from her grave.

Matthew 2:18

“In Rama was there a voice heard - These words, quoted from Jer 31:15, were originally spoken concerning the captivity of the ten tribes; but are here elegantly applied to the murder of the innocents at Bethlehem. As if he had said, Bethlehem at this time resembled Rama; for as Rachel might be said to weep over her children, which were slaughtered or gone into captivity; so in Bethlehem, the mothers lamented bitterly their children, because they were slain. The word θρηνος, lamentation is omitted by the Codd. Vatic.”

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 2:18

“She was buried near this place; and is here beautifully represented risen, as it were out of her grave, and bewailing her lost children. Because they are not - that is, are dead. The preservation of Jesus from this destruction, may be considered as a figure of God's care over his children in their greatest danger.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

Matthew 2:18

“Rachel, the mother of Joseph and Benjamin, was buried in the neighborhood of Bethlehem (Ge 35:19), where her sepulchre is still shown. She is figuratively represented as rising from the tomb and uttering a double lament for the loss of her children--first, by a bitter captivity, and now by a bloody death.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

Home at Last to Nazareth

Matthew 2:19-22

After Herod died: The angel's words, "those seeking the Child’s life are now dead," echo Exodus 4:19, where Moses is sent back with the same news. Joseph fears rightly, since Archelaus began his rule by killing three thousand in the temple courts. Warned in the fourth dream, Joseph turns aside to Galilee.

Matthew 2:19

“Many here err from ignorance of history, supposing the Herod who mocked our Lord on the day of His passion, and the Herod whose death is here related, were the same. But the Herod who was then made friends with Pilate was son of this Herod and brother to Archelaus; for Archelaus was banished to Lyons in Gaul, and his father Herod made king in his room, as we read in Josephus. From this we see that not Herod only, but also the Priests and Scribes had sought the Lord's death at that time.”

Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 2:19

“But when Herod was dead,.... Who died, as before observed, a few months after this tragedy was acted; and, according to the (w) Jewish writers, on the seventh day of the month Cisleu, and which answers to the twenty fifth of our November: and was afterwards observed as a day of rejoicing by the Jews.”

Matthew 2:19

“Herod was dead - See the notes at Mat 2:15. Herod left three sons, and the kingdom was at his death divided between them. To Archelaus was given Judea, Idumea, and Samaria; to Philip, Batanea and Trachonitis; to Antipas, Galilee and Perea. Each of these was also called Herod, and these are the individuals who are so frequently referred to in the New Testament during the ministry. of the Saviour and the labors of the apostles. The above table will show at a glance the chief connections of this family, as far as they are mentioned in the sacred history.”

The whole record on this verse →

The plural in the angel's words has puzzled readers, since only Herod has been named. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown take it as a common idiom for one person, while Adam Clarke and Albert Barnes allow Herod's son Antipater. Jerome thinks the priests and scribes had joined the plan.

Matthew 2:20

“So Joseph and the Virgin had, like Abraham, to "go out, not knowing whither they went," till they should receive further direction. for they are dead which sought the young child's life--a common expression in most languages where only one is meant, who here is Herod.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

1 more voice on this verse

Matthew 2:20

“They are dead - Both Herod and Antipater his son; though some think the plural is here used for the singular, and that the death of Herod alone is here intended. But as Herod’s son Antipater was at this time heir apparent to the throne, and he had cleared his way to it by procuring the death of both his elder brothers, he is probably alluded to here, as doubtless he entered into his father’s designs. They are dead - Antipater was put to death by his father’s command, five days before this execrable tyrant went to his own place.”

The whole record on this verse →

took the Child and His mother: Jerome notes the wording again, since Joseph takes the Child and His mother and never speaks of his son, as a foster father would. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown judge from the next verse that he meant to return to Bethlehem. John Gill calls his obedience exact in every circumstance.

Matthew 2:21

And he arose, and took the young child and his mother, and came into the land of Israel--intending, as is plain from what follows, to return to Bethlehem of Judea, there, no doubt, to rear the Infant King, as at His own royal city, until the time should come when they would expect Him to occupy Jerusalem, "the city of the Great King."

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

Archelaus was reigning in Judea: Galilee was held by Herod Antipas, so it lay outside the rule Joseph feared, as John Wesley and Jamieson, Fausset and Brown explain. Augustine asks how the family could still go up to Jerusalem each year, as Luke records. He answers that festival crowds hid them on short visits.

Matthew 2:22

“When he heard that Archelaus did reign - Herod, having put Antipater his eldest son to death, altered his will, and thus disposed of his dominions: he gave the tetrarchy of Galilee and Petrea to his son Antipas; the tetrarchy of Gaulonitis, Trachonitis, Batanea, and Paneadis, to his son Philip; and left the kingdom of Judea to his eldest remaining son, Archelaus. This son partook of the cruel and blood-thirsty disposition of his father: at one of the passovers, he caused three thousand of the people to be put to death in the temple and city.”

lived in a town called Nazareth: No Old Testament verse says "He will be called a Nazarene," and Matthew writes "the prophets," summing up their witness. One reading hears netzer, the Branch of Isaiah 11:1, another Nazareth as a despised place, fitting a despised Messiah. A third hears a Nazirite echo, though Jesus took no vow.

Matthew 2:23

“He came and dwelt in Nazareth - (where he had dwelt before he went to Bethlehem) a place contemptible to a proverb. So that hereby was fulfilled what has been spoken in effect by several of the prophets, (though by none of them in express words, ) He shall be called a Nazarene - that is, he shall be despised and rejected, shall be a mark of public contempt and reproach.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical

2 more voices on this verse

Matthew 2:23

“WE find the Jews speaking of Paul, and they say, "We have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes"—Acts 24:5. Thus it appears that our Lord and Master is called a Nazarene and His disciples are styled "the sect of the Nazarenes," while Christian doctrine was called, by the Jews, the heresy of the Nazarenes. Our Savior, though actually born at Bethlehem, was commonly known as Jesus of Nazareth, because Nazareth was the place where He was brought up.”

Matthew 2:23

“Had he meant to quote a particular text, he would not have written 'Prophets,' but 'the Prophet.' By thus using the plural he evidently does not take the words of any one passage in Scripture, but the sense of the whole. Nazarene is interpreted 'Holyd,' and that the Lord would be Holy, all Scripture testifies. Otherwise we may explain that it is found in Isaiah (c. 11:1.) rendered to the strict letter of the Hebrew. There shall come a Rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Nazarene shall grow out of His rootse.”

Jerome · written before 420 · Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic

The whole record on this verse →

How this psalm is built

The form: A narrative built around four quotations of the prophets, each tied to a place, as Chrysostom classes it.

The patterns in this chapter

How this chapter is built

2 more paragraphs on the patterns

The chapter names four places and gives each one a line of the prophets: Bethlehem at verses 5 and 6, Egypt at verse 15, Ramah at verses 17 and 18, and Nazareth at verse 23. Three of the four are introduced with a formula of fulfilment, and the first is spoken by the chief priests and scribes. John Chrysostom reads the Egypt quotation as a law of prophecy by which much that is spoken of one set of persons is fulfilled in another. John Wesley reads the formula to say what came about as its consequence, and he takes the word used there to signify the event of an action rather than its design.

Sources: John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 8, on Matthew 2:15; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament, 1755, on Matthew 2:15.

Keep studying

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The context

Chuck Missler, Learn the Bible in 24 Hours; John Gill, Exposition of the Old and New Testaments and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.

The form and classifications

John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew, Homily 8, c. 390, on Matthew 2:15.

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes; Augustine of Hippo, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Carl Friedrich Keil, Biblical Commentary on the Minor Prophets, on Hosea 11; Charles Spurgeon, The Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Sermon No. 1675; Flavius Josephus; Hilary of Poitiers, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book III; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jerome; John Chrysostom; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Lightfoot, Horae Hebraicae et Talmudicae on Matthew; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.