Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.

Leviticuschapter 19

37 verses · Moses, by tradition · 15th to 13th century BC · The Law

Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord.

Introduction

Moses, by tradition, The Law, Leviticus Overview.

Moses spoke this law to the whole assembly of Israel, and it asks ordinary people to share in the holiness of God. It ranges over worship, farming, trade, courts and the care of the weak, in the order of daily life. The first hearers were a generation born in slavery who would soon hold fields, scales and seats at the city gate. Listen for the short refrain that closes so many of its commands. Notice the command that Jesus later named the second greatest, and the same love required toward the foreigner. The chapter teaches holiness as something practised with neighbours.

Context

Who
Farmers, traders, judges and householders, a generation born in Egyptian slavery and now holding no land
What
A collection of commands on worship, family, harvest, trade, justice and love of neighbour, gathered under the call to be holy.
Where
The camp at the foot of Mount Sinai, with the law spoken to the whole assembly.
When
The second year after the Exodus, about 1445 BC on the traditional dating.
Why
To show that the holiness of the LORD reaches every part of common life, from the field to the court.

Historical context

The chapter is spoken by God to Moses for the whole congregation of Israel. Moses at this point is the man who has just brought the nation out of Egypt and up to the mountain. The dating follows the book's own setting at Sinai, which this site's dossier records as one of two positions held on the date of Leviticus.

Show the rest of the historical context, 3 more paragraphs

The place is the wilderness camp below Sinai, and the people in it own nothing but what they carried out of Egypt. Almost every law here assumes a settled farming life they have never lived. The field with corners, the vineyard with fallen grapes, the hired hand paid at nightfall and the planted fruit tree all belong to a country they have not entered.

A first hearer knew what gleaning was. A harvested field was cut by hand and the edges were the easiest part to skip. Leaving them standing meant leaving a measurable share of the crop where anyone could walk in and take it. Nobody was appointed to hand it over, and the poor came and gathered for themselves. Ruth 2 shows the arrangement working a few centuries later.

A first hearer also knew that a day labourer was paid in the evening because that money bought the evening meal. Withholding it overnight meant a family did not eat. The same hearer knew that a false balance was the ordinary way to cheat in a market where every sale was weighed out. The chapter answers it by naming the ephah and the hin, the standard dry and liquid measures of the region.

Significance

To people who had watched Egyptian religion from the bottom, holiness would have meant the priesthood, the temple and the things ordinary people never touched. This chapter told them that holiness meant the wage they paid, the field they cut, the story they repeated and the way they spoke to a deaf man who could not hear them.

Show the rest of the significance, 1 more paragraph

The refrain carried the weight. Fifteen sentences here end on I am the LORD, so the reason given for honest scales is the same reason given for reverencing the sanctuary.

This chapter in Jewish lifeWhat this chapter is in Jewish life and reading.

How it is read

Rashi opens this chapter by saying why it was delivered as it was: the words for the whole congregation teach "that this section was proclaimed in full assembly because most of the fundamental teachings of the Torah are dependent on it" (Rashi on Leviticus 19:2:1, the Rosenbaum and Silbermann Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary, 1929 to 1934, public domain, citing Sifra, Kedoshim, Section 1 1 and Vayikra Rabbah 24:5). That is the classical estimate of the chapter, and this site's Leviticus book page states the same verse as the book's own theme.

From there Rashi reads the commands one by one, and his interest is in how far each reaches. The fear of father and mother is laid on daughters as well as sons, and the masculine wording is explained by circumstance rather than by rank, "Because it is the man who has the means to do it, whilst the woman is under the control of others" (Rashi on Leviticus 19:3:1, citing Sifra, Kedoshim, Section 1 3 and Kiddushin 30b). The prohibition of stealing in this chapter is read of property, while the one in the Ten Commandments "is a warning addressed to him who steals a human being", because the commandments around it carry the death penalty (Rashi on Leviticus 19:11:1, citing Mekhilta 20:13:3 and Sanhedrin 86a). Wronging a neighbour is read narrowly and practically as withholding a workman's pay: it "refers to one who withholds the wages of a hired servant" (Rashi on Leviticus 19:13:1, citing Sifra, Kedoshim, Section 2 9 and Bava Metzia 61a). The ban on cursing the deaf is read as a ban on cursing anyone at all, the deaf man being named because he stands for the case where the person cursed can take no hurt from it: "He is one who cannot hear your curse and therefore cannot feel aggrieved, but he has the characteristic of being a living person!" (Rashi on Leviticus 19:14:1, citing Sifra, Kedoshim, Section 2 13 and Sanhedrin 66a). The duty of rebuke in the seventeenth verse is bounded by the duty not to shame, so that a man must rebuke his neighbour and yet "thou shalt not expose him to shame (lit., make his face grow pale) in public" (Rashi on Leviticus 19:17:1, citing Sifra, Kedoshim, Chapter 4 8 and Arakhin 16b).

The longest comment in the chapter is on the tale bearer, and it is worth a reader's time because it is Rashi working as a philologist. He holds that the word means a man who goes about spying, and describes the trade: "all those who sow discord between people and all who speak slander go into their friends' houses in order to spy out what evil they can see there", to carry it into the street (Rashi on Leviticus 19:16:1). The same comment preserves a custom Rashi says stood behind the Aramaic idiom for slander, that "people had the custom to eat a little snack in the house of him who listened to their slanderous words" as a pledge that the words were true, and he adds that "it is the manner of all who go about slandering to wink with their eyes" (Rashi on Leviticus 19:16:1, citing Berakhot 58a). On the laws of the field he points to the tractate of the Mishnah that carries this chapter's name for the corner left uncut, and to its rulings on which clusters count as gleanings (Rashi on Leviticus 19:9:1 and 19:10:1, citing Mishna Peah 1:2 and 7:4, Sifra, Kedoshim, Chapter 1 9 and Chapter 3 3, and Shabbat 23a). Of the young tree whose fruit is barred for three years he says the sense is "that it shall be, as it were, closed up and barred so that no benefit may be derived from it" (Rashi on Leviticus 19:23:1), and the fourth year's fruit he reads as the second tithe, carried up to Jerusalem and eaten there in praise of God (Rashi on Leviticus 19:24:1, citing Berakhot 35a).

The verse a Christian reader comes to this chapter for is the eighteenth, which Jesus joins to the command to love God. The corpus holds the reference Rashi on Leviticus 19:18:1 with no text, so his comment cannot be quoted here, and the one rabbinic locator the corpus carries on that verse is Avot DeRabbi Natan 16:4. Malbim comments at the first and twenty first verses, and the corpus holds no English version of either.

What the rabbis say

The corpus records forty rabbinic locators on this chapter, and every one of them is a locator without text, so this site cites where the rabbis took the chapter up rather than what they said there. The tractate that returns most is Bava Metzia, at 32a:14 and 32a:15 on the opening verses, at 49a:6, 58b:11-12 and 59b:13, and with it Bava Kamma at 69b:16, 94a:16, 99a:5 and 105b:19 and Bava Batra at 55a:9 and 89b:8, which together are the commercial tractates working the chapter's commands about wages, weights and the corner of the field. The rest are Berakhot 10b:29 and 35a:5, Avodah Zarah 14a:5 and 64a:3, Arakhin 16b:4, Chagigah 4a:11 and Chullin 13a:11, with the Jerusalem Talmud at Avodah Zarah 1:1:3, Gittin 5:5:1, Makkot 3:2:1 and 3:6:1, Nedarim 3:4:3 and Orlah 1:2:1. The midrashic locators are Sifra, Kedoshim, Section 1 1 and Chapter 7 7, Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Kedoshim 1:1, Bamidbar Rabbah 9:45, 10:5, 11:4, 14:6, 15:17, 17:5 and 23:9, Midrash Lekach Tov at Leviticus 19:34 and 19:37, Avot DeRabbi Natan 16:4, and the Ein Yaakov collections at Eiruvin 1:8 and, in the Glick edition, Shevuot 4:1 and Nedarim 6:7. Rashi himself hands on locators as he goes, and the ones he names in the kept text of this chapter are Sifra, Kedoshim at Sections 1 and 2 and Chapters 1, 3, 4 and 5, Vayikra Rabbah 24:5, Mishna Peah 1:2 and 7:4, the Mekhilta at 20:13:3, and the Babylonian Talmud at Kiddushin 30b, Shabbat 23a, Sanhedrin 66a and 86a, Bava Metzia 61a, Arakhin 16b, Zevachim 28a, Keritot 5a, 9a and 11a and Berakhot 35a and 58a.

Sources: Rashi, Rashi on Leviticus 19:2:1, 19:3:1, 19:4:1, 19:9:1, 19:10:1, 19:11:1, 19:12:1, 19:13:1, 19:14:1, 19:15:1, 19:16:1, 19:17:1, 19:19:1, 19:20:1, 19:22:1, 19:23:1 and 19:24:1, the Rosenbaum and Silbermann Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary, public domain, 1929; Malbim, Malbim on Leviticus, Kedoshim 1:1 and 56:1, cited only, no English version in the corpus; Mishnah, Peah 1:2 and 7:4, as Rashi cites them at Rashi on Leviticus 19:9:1 and 19:10:1; Sifra, Sifra, Kedoshim, Section 1 1 and Chapter 7 7 as the corpus links them; Sections 1 and 2 and Chapters 1, 3, 4 and 5 as Rashi cites them; Mekhilta, the Mekhilta at 20:13:3, as Rashi cites it at Rashi on Leviticus 19:11:1; Babylonian Talmud, Bava Metzia 32a:14, 32a:15, 49a:6, 58b:11-12 and 59b:13; Bava Kamma 69b:16, 94a:16, 99a:5 and 105b:19; Bava Batra 55a:9 and 89b:8; Berakhot 10b:29 and 35a:5; Avodah Zarah 14a:5 and 64a:3; Arakhin 16b:4; Chagigah 4a:11; Chullin 13a:11; and, as Rashi cites them, Kiddushin 30b, Shabbat 23a, Sanhedrin 66a and 86a, Bava Metzia 61a, Zevachim 28a, Keritot 5a, 9a and 11a, and Berakhot 35a and 58a; Jerusalem Talmud, Avodah Zarah 1:1:3, Gittin 5:5:1, Makkot 3:2:1 and 3:6:1, Nedarim 3:4:3, Orlah 1:2:1; Midrash, Vayikra Rabbah 24:5, as Rashi cites it; Midrash Tanchuma Buber, Kedoshim 1:1; Bamidbar Rabbah 9:45, 10:5, 11:4, 14:6, 15:17, 17:5 and 23:9; Midrash Lekach Tov, Leviticus 19:34:1 and 19:37:1; Avot DeRabbi Natan, Avot DeRabbi Natan 16:4, the one rabbinic locator the corpus carries on the eighteenth verse; Ein Yaakov, Ein Yaakov, Eiruvin 1:8; Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition), Shevuot 4:1 and Nedarim 6:7; MannaFest, the theme of the book stated at Leviticus 19:2, on the Leviticus book page, 2026.

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

Holy as your God is holy

Leviticus 19:1-2

The command is given to "the whole congregation of Israel", so what follows falls on farmers, traders and judges as well as on the priests. The call to "Be holy" stands at 11:44, here and 20:26, and 1 Peter 1:16 carries it into the church. The ground given is the character of the speaker, and the chapter returns to that ground fifteen more times before it ends.

Leviticus 19:1

“And the Lord spake unto Moses,.... About the same, or quickly after he had delivered the above laws to him; and there are many in this chapter, which were before given, and here repeated: saying; as follows.”

Albert Barnes calls this command the keynote of the whole book and finds no systematic order in the laws that follow, which enforce ordinary duties by appeal to the highest authority. John Gill thinks the words reached the people through the heads of tribes and families. Bonaventure describes holiness as conformity to God.

Leviticus 19:2

“Ye shall be holy ... - These words express the keynote to the whole book of Leviticus, being addressed to the whole nation. There does not appear to be any systematic arrangement in the laws which follow. They were intended as guards to the sanctity of the elect people, enforcing common duties by immediate appeal to the highest authority. Compare Lev 18:24-30 note.”

1 more voice on this verse

Leviticus 19:2

“The will of God in the Old as well as the New Testament Church was not locked up in the repositories of an unknown tongue, but communicated plainly and openly to the people.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

Cross references

Leviticus 19:2

Leviticus 19:3-4

Three of the ten commandments stand in these two verses, and the first is turned around. Exodus 20:12 says to honor father and mother, while verse 3 names "his mother and father" and asks for respect where honor stood. Adam Clarke renders the Hebrew word for idols in verse 4, elilim, as nothings, and 1 Corinthians 8:4 says that an idol is nothing.

Leviticus 19:3

“Compare Exo 20:8, Exo 20:12; Exo 31:13-14. The two laws repeated here are the only laws in the Decalogue which assume a positive shape, all the others being introduced by the formula, “Thou shalt not.” These express two great central points, the first belonging to natural law and the second to positive law, in the maintenance of the well-being of the social body of which Yahweh was the acknowledged king.”

Matthew Henry reads the mention of molten gods as a pointer back to the molten calf of Exodus 32. He adds that Israel is the work of God's hands, while a cast image is the work of their own. The verse restates the second commandment.

Leviticus 19:4

“Turn ye not unto idols - אלילם elilim, literally nothings; and to this St. Paul seems to allude 1Co 8:4, where he says, We know that an idol is Nothing in the world.”

Leviticus 19:5-8

A rule about sacrifice sits in a chapter about neighbors, and a peace offering eaten on the third day "is tainted and will not be accepted". Matthew Henry reads this as an offering made by the law and then lost by what the offerer did afterward. The verses on theft and lying that follow name no penalty, while this one ends with the eater "cut off from his people".

Leviticus 19:5

“Peace-offerings - See the notes at the conclusion of Leviticus 7 at Lev 7:38 (note).”

2 more voices on this verse

Leviticus 19:5

“Though the sacrifice was offered according to the law, if it was not eaten according to the law, it was not accepted. Though ministers do their part, what the better if people do not theirs? There is work to be done after our spiritual sacrifices, in a due improvement of them; and, if this be neglected, all is in vain.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Leviticus 19:5

“Rather, ye shall offer it that you may be accepted.”

The two-day limit matches the rule for vow and freewill offerings at 7:16, while a thank offering had to be eaten on the day it was offered (7:15). Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that peace offerings made for thanks or for vows were always freewill offerings. Burning disposes of the rest.

John Gill notes the doubled Hebrew verb, which he takes to mean that even the least bit eaten on the third day brings the penalty. He reads tainted as treating the offering as common or corrupt flesh, as if it had never been a sacrifice. Adam Clarke refers the reader to 7:15.

Leviticus 19:7

“And if it be eaten at all on the third day,.... Or "in eating be eaten" (k) any of it be eaten, the least bit of it: it is abominable; it is as any common thing, as if it was no sacrifice; yea, as if it was corrupt and putrefied flesh; nay, as what is abominable to God: and therefore it follows: it shall not be accepted; of the Lord, but rejected, his will not being attended to. (k) האכל יאכל "comedendo, comedetur", Drusius.”

The flesh of the peace offering stays holy to the LORD after the altar, so the worshiper's handling of it afterward still counts. Matthew Henry applies this to the work that follows any spiritual sacrifice, which can make the whole vain if neglected. Whoever eats bears the iniquity.

Leave the gleanings; love your neighbor

Leviticus 19:9-10

The edges of the field and the fallen grapes are left "for the poor and the foreigner", and the law appoints nobody to hand them over. The owner leaves the produce standing and the poor gather it themselves, the arrangement Ruth 2 runs on when a Moabite widow gleans behind the reapers of Boaz. Leviticus 23:22 repeats the rule, and Deuteronomy 24:19-21 extends it to the olive tree.

Leviticus 19:9

“During the harvest, [the law] forbids owners to gather up the bits which fall from the sheaves and similarly advises that in harvesting something should be left behind unreaped. By this it gives excellent teaching to owners in the practice of generous sharing by leaving some of their property for those in need and providing the poor with a chance for food.”

Clement of Alexandria · written before 215 · The Stromata Book 2patristic

Albert Barnes widens the terms, taking the grapes as fallen fruit of any kind and the vineyard as any fruit garden. He explains the foreigner as one who could own no land in Israel, and so had no harvest of his own. Clement of Alexandria reads the rule as teaching owners generous sharing.

Leviticus 19:11-12

The commands run in the order a fraud happens: a man steals, lies and deceives to cover it, and by verse 12 swears falsely by the name of God. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown read the passage as aimed at the small, little-thought-of vices of ordinary business. The false oath is the one act here said to "profane the name of your God".

Leviticus 19:11

“Ye shall not steal,.... Which is the eighth command; See Gill on Exo 20:15; though Jarchi thinks something different from that law is here intended; that this is a caution against stealing of money, that in the decalogue against stealing of souls, or men.”

1 more voice on this verse

Leviticus 19:11

“Lev 19:11 forbids injuries perpetrated by craft; Lev 19:13, those perpetrated by violence or power, the conversion of might into right. In Lev 19:13 “defraud” should rather be, oppress.”

The whole record on this verse →

John Gill ties the oath to the frauds of verse 11, a man swearing he holds no deposit of another's or that a debt is owed when it is not. Matthew Henry adds that the name is also profaned when it is used for trifles. A sworn lie is worse than a spoken one.

Leviticus 19:12

“To a lie: You shall not swear falsely. It is bad to tell a lie, but it is much worse to swear it. To a trifle, and every impertinence: Neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God, by alienating it to any other purpose than that for which it is to be religiously used.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

Leviticus 19:12

“And ye shall not swear by my name falsely,.... Or "to a falsehood" (x), to any of the above cases; as that a man has not the deposit of another's in his hands, when he has; or that such a man owes him so much money, when he does not, or any other false thing.”

Leviticus 19:13-14

The hired hand is paid before morning because the wage is his next meal, and Adam Clarke says it supports his family as fast as it is earned. Verse 14 names two wrongs the victim cannot detect, a curse the deaf do not hear and a stumbling block the blind do not see. The only enforcement is "you shall fear your God", so the law covers cases with no witness.

Leviticus 19:13

“Let no one deny the hireling the wage he is owed, since we too are hirelings of our God, and from him we look forward to the reward of our labor. And if you indeed, whatever type of businessman you are, deny your hireling a monetary payment that is a perishable trifle, you shall be denied the reward of heaven that has been promised. You shall not defraud, as the law says, the hireling of his pay.”

Ambrose of Milan · written before 397 · LETTER 62 (19).3patristic

1 more voice on this verse

Leviticus 19:13

“Let the day-labourer have his wages as soon as he has done his day's work, if he desire it. It is a great sin to deny the payment of it, nay, to defer it, to his damage, a sin that cries to heaven for vengeance, Jam. v. 4 .”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse →

curse the deaf: Gregory the Dialogist reads the deaf as anyone absent who cannot hear what is said about him, and the blind as anyone without the discernment to avoid offence. Adam Clarke forbids any advantage taken of a neighbor's ignorance, simplicity or inexperience. Albert Barnes compares Deuteronomy 27:18.

Leviticus 19:14

“Thou shalt not curse the deaf - Or speak evil of him, because he cannot hear, and so cannot vindicate his own character. Nor put a stumbling - block before the blind - He who is capable of doing this, must have a heart cased with cruelty. The spirit and design of these precepts are, that no man shall in any case take advantage of the ignorance, simplicity, or inexperience of his neighbor, but in all things do to his neighbor as he would, on a change of circumstances, that his neighbor should do to him.”

2 more voices on this verse

Leviticus 19:14

“It is added, as a preservative from these sins, but fear thou God. "Thou dost not fear the deaf and blind, they cannot right themselves; but remember it is the glory of God to help the helpless, and he will plead their cause." Note, The fear of God will restrain us from doing that which will not expose us to men's resentments.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Leviticus 19:14

“For to curse the deaf is to disparage one who is absent and does not hear; but to put a stumbling-block before the blind is to act indeed with discernment, but yet to give cause of offence to him who has not the light of discernment.”

Gregory the Dialogist · written before 604 · THE BOOK OF PASTORAL RULE, Part 3patristic

Leviticus 19:15-16

Partiality is forbidden in both directions, "to the poor or favoritism to the rich", so pity is named as a way of judging wrongly alongside fear. Verse 16 sets the man "spreading slander among your people" beside the man who would "endanger the life of your neighbor". The older commentators read that second charge as conspiring against a life or bearing false witness where a life is at stake.

Leviticus 19:15

"You shall not be partial to the poor," a precept given lest under pretext of showing pity we should judge an unjust judgment. For each individual is to be judged not by his personal importance but by the merits of his case. His wealth need not stand in the way of the rich man, if he makes a good use of it; and poverty of itself can be no recommendation to the poor if in the midst of squalor and want he fails to stay away from wrongdoing.

Jerome · written before 420 · LETTER 79.1patristic

Adam Clarke traces the word for slanderer to rachil, a trader or peddler, one who travels dealing in other people's secrets. For the second command Albert Barnes gives two readings, standing up as an accuser against a neighbor's life, or standing idle while that life is in danger. Either way justice is obstructed.

Leviticus 19:16

“Thou shalt not go up and down as a tale-bearer - רכיל rachil signifies a trader, a peddler, and is here applied to the person who travels about dealing in scandal and calumny, getting the secrets of every person and family, and retailing them wherever he goes. A more despicable character exists not: such a person is a pest to society, and should be exiled from the habitations of men.”

The command reaches inside a man, forbidding hatred in the heart before any act has followed it. The remedy is speech, since "Directly rebuke your neighbor" puts an open word where a grudge would sit, and Matthew 18:15 carries the same order into the church. The closing clause, "so that you will not incur guilt on account of him", makes silence the thing that leaves the sin standing.

Leviticus 19:17

“Not suffer sin upon him - Rather, not hear sin on his account; that is, either by bearing secret ill-will Eph 4:26, or by encouraging him to sin in withholding due rebuke Rom 1:32.”

The words "love your neighbor as yourself" appear here first in Scripture, and no verse of Leviticus is quoted more in the New Testament. Jesus names it the second commandment at Matthew 22:39, and Paul and James cite it at Romans 13:9 and James 2:8. The chapter closes it with the same "I am the LORD" as fourteen other sentences and sets it against revenge and a grudge.

Leviticus 19:18

“For since it is written in the law: "You shall love your neighbor as yourself," he is proven to love his neighbor less who does not share with him even those things necessary to himself in his neighbor's time of need. Therefore the precept is given about dividing two tunics with one's neighbor, because this could not be said of one tunic, since if one is divided, no one is clothed. For with half a tunic, both he who receives remains naked and he who gave remains naked.”

Gregory the Dialogist · written before 604 · 40 Homilies on the Gospels - Homily 20patristic

Cross references

Leviticus 19:18

ConnectionsGalatians 5:14

Mixtures, and fruit you must wait for

Three mixtures are forbidden, in breeding, in sowing and in cloth, and the text gives no reason for any of them. Keil and Delitzsch read the ban as a guard on the distinctions God set in creation, while other writers point to the priestly garments and take the mixture as reserved for holy use. The only ground offered is the opening sentence, "You are to keep My statutes".

Leviticus 19:19

“Linen and woolen - The original word is found only here and in Deu 22:11, where it is rendered “of divers sorts.” It may denote such tissues as linsey woolsey.”

Leviticus 19:20-22

This is the chapter's one ruling written as a legal case, and the death sentence of Leviticus 20:10 is withheld "because she had not been freed". The phrase "due punishment" is read by some as a formal inquiry and by others as a beating. The man brings "a ram to the entrance to the Tent of Meeting", and no other verse in the chapter sends anyone to the altar.

Leviticus 19:20

“A woman that is a bondmaid - Had she been free, the law required that she should be put to death; (see Deu 22:24); but as she was a slave, she is supposed to have less self-command, and therefore less guilt: but as it is taken for granted she did not make resistance, or did consent, she is to be scourged, and the man is to bring a ram for a trespass-offering.”

Matthew Henry explains why a penalty falls at all. The betrothal gave the union the honor of marriage, so the wrong was punished, while her unfreed status kept it from the penalty for adultery with a free woman. He adds that the gospel knows no such distinction between bond and free.

The verse calls the act a sin twice. Forgiveness comes through the priest's atonement with the ram, as it does for the guilt offerings of 5:16 and 6:7. Matthew Henry reads the penalty and the offering together as guarding the honor of marriage, even where the marriage had only begun with betrothal.

Leviticus 19:23-25

A planted tree is left three years, its fourth crop is "consecrated as a praise offering to the LORD", and the owner eats in the fifth. The Hebrew behind "forbidden" is the word uncircumcised, which the Torah uses of men and of the lips of Moses at Exodus 6:12, and of a tree only here. The law assumes a settled people who wait four years to taste what they planted.

Matthew Henry records two uses for this fruit. It was given to the priests or eaten before the LORD with joy, like the second tithe. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown quote Michaelis, who took the earlier ban to mean pinching off the young fruit by hand.

Leviticus 19:24

“If any did come to perfection, it was not to be used in the service either of God or man; but what they bore the fourth year was to be holy to the Lord, either given to the priests, or eaten before the Lord with joy, as their second tithe was, and thenceforward it was all their own.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

John Gill reads the promise as a harvest large enough to make up for the three years without fruit and the fourth year given to God. The owner eats from the fifth year on. Gill grounds the promise in the closing words, I am the LORD your God.

Leviticus 19:25

“And in the fifth year shall ye eat of the fruit thereof,.... And so in all succeeding years as long as the tree lasted and bore: that it may yield unto you the increase thereof; may be so abundantly blessed, and produce so large an increase as to answer the three years' want of any fruit from it, and the dedication of the fruit of the fourth year to the Lord: I am the Lord your God; who has promised this increase, is both able and faithful to make it good.”

No omens, no cuttings, no mediums

Leviticus 19:26-28

These verses forbid the practices of the nations in eating, in divination and in mourning. One Hebrew word names the edge of the field in verse 9 and the side of the head in verse 27, so a farmer leaves both edges alone. Deuteronomy 14:1 grounds the ban on cutting for the dead in sonship, while Leviticus gives no reason beyond "I am the LORD".

Leviticus 19:26

“Neither shall ye use enchantment - לא תנחשו lo thenachashu. Conjecture itself can do little towards a proper explanation of the terms used in this verse. נחש nachash; See note at Gen 3:1 (note), we translate serpent, and with very little propriety; but though the word may not signify a serpent in that place, it has that signification in others. Possibly, therefore, the superstition here prohibited may be what the Greeks called Ophiomanteia, or divination by serpents.”

1 more voice on this verse

Leviticus 19:26

“Eating upon the blood, as the Gentiles did, who gathered the blood of their sacrifices into a vessel for their demons (as they fancied) to drink, and then sat about it, eating the flesh themselves, signifying their communion with devils by their feasting with them.”

Matthew Henry · Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse →

Jamieson, Fausset and Brown trace the fashion to Egypt, where hair was cropped to leave a circle on the crown and the beard was dressed square. Adam Clarke judges the exact custom hard to recover. He cites Herodotus on Arabs who cut their hair round in honor of Bacchus.

Leviticus 19:27

“Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, &c.--It seems probable that this fashion had been learned by the Israelites in Egypt, for the ancient Egyptians had their dark locks cropped short or shaved with great nicety, so that what remained on the crown appeared in the form of a circle surrounding the head, while the beard was dressed into a square form.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

1 more voice on this verse

Leviticus 19:27

“Ye shall not round the corners your heads - This and the following verse evidently refer to customs which must have existed among the Egyptians when the Israelites sojourned in Egypt; and what they were it is now difficult, even with any probability, to conjecture. Herodotus observes that the Arabs shave or cut their hair round, in honor of Bacchus, who, they say, had his hair cut in this way, lib. iii., cap.”

John Gill describes the cuttings as made with the nails, tearing the cheeks, or with a knife or razor. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown describe tattoo marks made with a hot iron or with ink or paint. Adam Clarke cites Virgil on such grief.

Leviticus 19:29-30

The reason attached to verse 29 is corporate, that the land itself falls to whoredom and becomes full of wickedness, so the harm named reaches past the household to the country. Verse 30 returns to my sabbaths, which the chapter already commanded at verse 3, and adds reverence for the sanctuary. Naming the sabbath at both ends puts a frame around the commands about neighbours that sit between them.

Leviticus 19:29

“Do not prostitute thy daughter - This was a very frequent custom, and with examples of it writers of antiquity abound. The Cyprian women, according to Justin, gained that portion which their husbands received with them at marriage by previous public prostitution. And the Phoenicians, according to Augustine, made a gift to Venus of the gain acquired by the public prostitution of their daughters, previously to their marriage. “Veneri donum dabant, et prostitutiones filiarum, antequam jungerent eas viris.” - De Civit. Del, lib. xviii., c. 5; and see Calmet.”

Jamieson, Fausset and Brown note that this command often stands beside bans on idolatrous practice, and here it follows the pagan customs of verses 26 to 29. Matthew Henry reads sabbath and sanctuary as Israel's guard against heathen superstition. The same command returns at 26:2.

Leviticus 19:30

“Ye shall keep my sabbaths, and reverence my sanctuary: I am the LORD. Sabbatha mea custodite, et sanctuarium meum timete. Six days shall work be done: but the seventh day is the sabbath of rest, an holy convocation; ye shall do no work therein: it is the sabbath of the LORD in all your dwellings.”

John Calvin · Commentaries (1554)reformed

1 more voice on this verse

Leviticus 19:30

“Ye shall keep my sabbaths, and reverence my sanctuary--This precept is frequently repeated along with the prohibition of idolatrous practices, and here it stands closely connected with the superstitions forbidden in the previous verses.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse →

Leviticus 19:31-32

Mediums and spiritists are first named in Scripture here, and the stated result of seeking them is that "you will be defiled by them". In 1 Samuel 28 a king of Israel does what this verse forbids. Verse 32 then says to "rise in the presence of the elderly", so the chapter forbids seeking the dead in one verse and commands standing for the living aged in the next.

Leviticus 19:31

“Regard not them that have familiar spirits--The Hebrew word, rendered "familiar spirit," signifies the belly, and sometimes a leathern bottle, from its similarity to the belly. It was applied in the sense of this passage to ventriloquists, who pretended to have communication with the invisible world.”

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown · Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

Honor gray hair, love the stranger, weigh honestly

John Gill reports the rabbinic reckoning that sixty years brought old age and seventy brought gray hair. Albert Barnes notes that the outward respect of standing is tied directly to the fear of God. Matthew Henry grounds it in God as the Ancient of Days.

Leviticus 19:32

“Thou shall rise up before the hoary head,.... Or "before old age" (q), which may be discerned by the hoary or grey hairs upon the head; that is, before a grey-headed man, or an old man, and one was reckoned so when he was of seventy years of age; for so it is said (r), one of sixty years is arrived to old age, and one of seventy to grey hairs.”

Leviticus 19:33-34

The love command is given a second time, and its object is the foreigner, in the only other place the Torah says "as yourself". The foreigner is to be treated "as native-born", so the measure is the treatment a citizen receives. The reason moves from the refrain to memory, "for you were foreigners in the land of Egypt", the ground Exodus 22:21 and 23:9 also give.

Leviticus 19:33

“If a stranger sojourn - This law to protect and comfort the stranger was at once humane and politic. None is so desolate as the stranger, and none needs the offices of benevolence and charity more: and we may add that he who is not affected by the desolate state of the stranger has neither benevolence nor charity.”

John Wesley gives more than one sense to the equal standing, and in the matter of church privileges he limits it to proselytes. He reads the memory of Egypt as knowledge of a stranger's fears and distresses, which calls for pity. Matthew Henry notes that all nations are of one blood.

Leviticus 19:34

“Or 2, as to church- privileges, so it concerns only those who were proselytes. Ye were strangers - And therefore are sensible of the fears, distresses, and miseries of such, which call for your pity, and you ought to do to them, as you desired others should do to you, when you were such.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Leviticus 19:35-37

In the Hebrew, verse 35 opens with the sentence that opened verse 15 and applies it to "measures of length, weight, or volume". The courtroom and the market are put under one rule, so a short measure is handled as a wrong verdict, and Proverbs 11:1 keeps that pairing. The chapter closes on "I am the LORD", which falls fifteen times in these thirty-seven verses.

Leviticus 19:35

“The ephah is here taken as the standard of dry measure, and the bin (see Exo 29:40 note) as the standard of liquid measure. Of the two very different estimates of the capacities of these measures, the more probable is that the ephah did not hold quite four gallons and a half, and the hin not quite six pints. The log was a twelfth part of the hin Lev 14:10. Lev 19:36 I am the Lord your God ... - A full stop should precede these words.”

1 more voice on this verse

Leviticus 19:35

“In mete-yard - In the measuring of lands, or dry things, as cloth, ribband. In measure - In the measuring liquid or such dry things as are only contigious, as corn or wine.”

John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The whole record on this verse →

John Wesley explains the ephah as the common dry measure and the hin as the common liquid measure, standing for all others. Adam Clarke notes that the Hebrew word for weights means stones, since weights appear to have first been formed from stones. The verse grounds honest trade in the exodus.

Leviticus 19:36

“Just balances - Scales, steel-yard, etc. Weights, אבנים abanim, stones, as the weights appear to have been originally formed out of stones. Ephah, hin, etc., see before.”

Adam Clarke derives statutes from a root meaning to trace out, the path of duty God has marked, and ordinances from a root meaning to discern or determine. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown read the closing I am the LORD as a claim to the authority of Creator, Deliverer and Sovereign. Matthew Henry pairs careful observing with obeying.

Leviticus 19:37

“Shall ye observe all my statutes - חקתי chukkothi, from חק chak, to describe, mark, or trace out; the righteousness which I have described, and the path of duty which I have traced out. Judgments, משפטי mishpatai, from שפט shaphat, to discern, determine, direct, etc.; that which Divine Wisdom has discerned to be best for man, has determined shall promote his best interest, and has directed him conscientiously to use. See the note on Lev 26:15.”

How this psalm is built

The form: Apodictic instruction to the whole congregation, a run of short commands held together by a refrain, as Bonar classes it.

The patterns in this chapter

The devices this chapter is built on, what each one does, and one verse where it stands.
DeviceWhat it doesWhere to see it
I am the LORD, fifteen timesThe sentence I am the LORD, alone or with your God added, closes fifteen sentences in these thirty seven verses. The published exposition of verses 35 to 37 counts that as a third of every occurrence in the book. The refrain is the only reason the chapter gives for most of what it commands.Keil and Delitzsch, with Matthew Henry, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch, 1864 to 1870, and Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, cited in the published exposition of Leviticus 19:35 to 19:37.Leviticus 19:3, Leviticus 19:10, Leviticus 19:18, Leviticus 19:37
The sabbaths at both endsMy Sabbaths is commanded at verse 3 and commanded again at verse 30, and the commands about neighbours all stand between them. The published exposition of verses 29 to 30 reads the repetition as a frame put round the middle of the chapter.Matthew Henry, with Andrew Bonar, Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, and A Commentary on Leviticus, 1846, cited in the published exposition of Leviticus 19:29 to 19:30.Leviticus 19:3, Leviticus 19:30
The corner of the field and the corner of the headOne Hebrew word stands behind the corner of the field at verse 9 and the corner of the head at verse 27. A farmer leaves the edge of his crop standing for the poor and leaves the edge of his hair alone, and the published exposition of verses 26 to 28 marks the shared word.Keil and Delitzsch, with Adam Clarke, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch, 1864 to 1870, and Commentary on the Bible, 1832, cited in the published exposition of Leviticus 19:26 to 19:28.Leviticus 19:9, Leviticus 19:27
The three forbidden mixturesVerse 19 names three mixtures in one sentence, in breeding, in sowing and in cloth, and gives no reason for any of them. Keil and Delitzsch read the ban as a guard on the distinctions God set in creation, and other writers point to the priest's garments and the sanctuary curtains, where the two fibres were woven together.Keil and Delitzsch, with John Gill, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch, 1864 to 1870, and Exposition of the Old Testament, 1748 to 1763, cited in the published exposition of Leviticus 19:19.Leviticus 19:19
The fraud told in the order it happensVerses 11 to 12 run in the sequence a fraud actually takes. A man steals, deals falsely to cover it, lies to the man he took from, and swears by the name of God to close the argument. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown read the passage as aimed at the small vices of ordinary business rather than at great crimes.Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, 1871, cited in the published exposition of Leviticus 19:11 to 19:12.Leviticus 19:11, Leviticus 19:12
Speak to the whole congregationVerse 2 sends the chapter to all the congregation of the children of Israel, so what follows falls on farmers, traders and judges rather than on the priesthood alone. The published exposition of verses 1 to 2 reads the address as the thing that sets this chapter apart from the priestly instruction around it.Andrew Bonar, with Matthew Henry, A Commentary on Leviticus, 1846, and Commentary on the Whole Bible, 1710, cited in the published exposition of Leviticus 19:1 to 19:2.Leviticus 19:2

The New Testament's use

12 more paragraphs on the patterns

Verse 18 is the most quoted verse of Leviticus in the New Testament. Jesus names love your neighbour as yourself the second commandment at Matthew 22:39 and Mark 12:31. Paul says the whole law is fulfilled in it at Romans 13:9 and Galatians 5:14. James calls it the royal law at 2:8. The published exposition of verses 17 to 18 sets those five places out and notes that the chapter itself gives the sentence no emphasis whatever.

Verse 2 is quoted into the church at 1 Peter 1:16, be ye holy, for I am holy. The published exposition of verses 1 to 2 records that ye shall be holy occurs three times in Leviticus, at 11:44, here, and 20:26, and that Peter carries the refrain across.

Verse 13 is taken up at James 5:4, where the wage kept back cries out. The published exposition of verses 13 to 14 sets James beside Deuteronomy 24:15, which gives the rule with the reason that the labourer sets his heart on his pay. Verse 17 is carried into the church at Matthew 18:15, where a man is told to go and tell his brother his fault between them alone.

What a first hearer heard that a reader today does not

The gleaning law of verses 9 and 10 appoints nobody to hand anything over. The owner leaves the edge of the field standing and the poor come and take it themselves. That is the arrangement Ruth 2 runs on when a Moabite widow gleans behind the reapers of Boaz, and Deuteronomy 24:19 to 21 extends the same rule to the olive tree and the vineyard. Leviticus 23:22 repeats it inside the feast calendar.

Verses 13 and 14 name crimes with no witness. A day labourer is paid before nightfall because that money is the evening meal, which Adam Clarke states plainly on the verse. A deaf man does not hear a curse and a blind man does not see what was laid in his path. The only enforcement the text offers is the clause but shalt fear thy God. The word stumblingblock occurs here for the first time in Scripture.

The debated readings

The three mixtures of verse 19. Keil and Delitzsch read the ban as a guard on the distinctions God set in creation. Other writers point to the priest's garments and the sanctuary curtains, where the two fibres were woven together, and take a mixture as a thing reserved for holy use. Deuteronomy 22:9 to 11 repeats all three prohibitions and adds the ox and the ass ploughing together. The text gives no reason for any of them and opens instead with ye shall keep my statutes.

The case at verses 20 to 22. This is the only ruling in the chapter written as a legal case, with a situation, a penalty and a remedy. The woman is a bondmaid betrothed and not yet redeemed, and the death sentence Leviticus 20:10 attaches to adultery is withheld here because she was not free. The word rendered scourged is read by some commentators as a formal inquiry into the case rather than as a beating. The published exposition records that the writers differ over which it is and over who bears it.

How a Christian reads the chapter now. This site's published dossier states the question and names two positions. The threefold division of the law into moral, ceremonial and civil is held by Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologica I to II. Later confessional statements hold it too, among them the Westminster Confession of Faith, chapter 19, of 1646. On that reading the moral law abides while the ceremonial and civil law found their fulfilment in Christ. The second position holds that the division is a later theological framework the text itself does not mark. It is held by a number of Old Testament scholars and New Covenant Theology writers, who observe that Leviticus presents its laws as one covenant instruction. The dossier also records that at the Jerusalem council the apostles asked Gentile believers for a handful of specific abstentions rather than for the ceremonial law, at Acts 15:19 to 20 and 15:28 to 29.

The foreigner and the love command

The love command is given twice in this chapter and the second time its object is the foreigner. The published exposition of verses 33 to 34 records that these two verses hold the only other occurrence of as thyself in the Torah. The stranger who dwells in the land is counted as one born among you, so the measure set is the treatment a citizen receives. The reason moves off the refrain and onto memory, for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt, which is the ground Exodus 22:21 and 23:9 also give.

Keep studying

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The form and classifications

Adam Clarke and John Calvin, Commentary on the Bible, 1832, and Commentary on the Four Last Books of Moses Arranged in the Form of a Harmony, 1563, both cited in the published exposition of Leviticus 19:3 to 19:4; Andrew Bonar, A Commentary on Leviticus, 1846, on Leviticus 19:1 to 19:2, as cited in the published exposition of this chapter; Gordon Wenham, as carried by this site's published chiasm, src/components/book/dossier-content/leviticus.ts, the chiasm "The book's own concentric shape, centered on the Day of Atonement", source given as the symmetry widely noted in Leviticus scholarship including the NICOT commentary of 1979, status proposed and This site's published dossier on Leviticus, src/components/book/dossier-content/leviticus.ts, the provenance question "Audience" and the theology entry "The Holiness Code: ethics as holiness".

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Andrew Bonar, A Commentary on Leviticus; Bonaventure, Collations on the Hexaemeron, Collation 2; Clement of Alexandria, The Stromata Book 2; Gregory the Dialogist, THE BOOK OF PASTORAL RULE, Part 3; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Calvin, Commentary on the Four Last Books of Moses Arranged in the Form of a Harmony; John Gill; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.