Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Luke 11:15

in Luke 11

but some of them said, “It is by Beelzebul, the prince of the demons, that He drives out demons.”

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV

ASV

But some of them said, By Beelzebub the prince of the demons casteth he out demons.

KJV

But some of them said, He casteth out devils through Beelzebub the chief of the devils.

This verse in Luke 11

Commentary

11 notes on this verse
But some of them said,.... The Pharisees, Mat 9:34 Mat 12:24 who could not bear that he should be thought to be the Messiah, and therefore put an ill construction on the miracle: he casteth out devils through Beelzebub, the chief of devils; in several copies he is called Beelzebul, and in the Arabic and Ethiopic versions; which last adds these words, "and he answered and said, how can Satan cast out Satan?" See Gill on Mat 12:20.

This site's exposition

He casteth out devils through Beelzebub

on Luke 11:15-16

He casteth out devils through Beelzebub the chief of the devils is an accusation that does not deny the miracle, for the enemies of Jesus never claim the dumb man is still dumb, only that the power comes from the wrong source. Beelzebub, a name mocking a Philistine god of Ekron, lord of the flies, had by this time become a common Jewish name for the prince of demons, and the charge trades on the real danger of demonic counterfeit rather than inventing one. Others, tempting him, sought of him a sign from heaven ask for something grander than an exorcism, a sign in the sky such as the rabbis debated whether even a true prophet could supply, and both responses are answered together in what follows.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers1 voice

A commentator

Cyril of Alexandria

Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, Sermon 80 · Written before 444.

proposed

And upon the accomplishment of this wonderful act, the multitude extolled Him with praises, and hastened to crown the worker of the miracle with godlike honour. But certain of them, it says, being Scribes and Pharisees, with hearts intoxicated with pride and envy, found in the miracle fuel for their malady; and not only did they not praise Him, but betook themselves to the very opposite. For having stripped Him of the godlike deeds He had wrought, they assigned to the Devil almighty power, and made Beelzebub the source of Christ's might.

The Medieval Church4 voices

A commentator

Bonaventure

Commentary on Luke, Chapter 11 · Written in the 13th century.

proposed

Secondly, regarding the blasphemy of human fraud, it is added: But some of them said: He casts out demons by Beelzebub, the prince of demons. And this was a great blasphemy, because what was done by the Holy Spirit they attributed to the evil spirit: …

A commentator

Bede

On the Gospel of Luke · Written before 735.

proposed

But some of them said, "In Beelzebub, the prince of demons, He casts out demons." Not some from the crowd, but the Pharisees and scribes were slandering, as other evangelists testify. Indeed, to the crowds who seemed less educated, always marveling at the deeds of …

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Luke · Written before 1107.

proposed

The Pharisees slander the miracle and revile the Lord as a deceiver. They say: He is in league with the prince of demons and with his assistance "casts out demons."

A commentator

Bede

Catena Aurea by Aquinas · Written before 735.

proposed

But since the multitudes who were thought ignorant always marvelled at our Lord's actions, the Scribes and Pharisees took pains to deny them, or to pervert them by an artful interpretation, as though they were not the work of a Divine power, but of an unclean spirit. Hence it follows, But some of them said, He casteth out devils through Beelzebub the prince of the devils. Beelzebub was the God Accaron. For Beel is indeed Baal himself. But Zebub means a fly. Now he is called Beelzebub as the man of flies, from whose most foul practices the chief of the devils was so named.
4 more voices on this verse

The Puritans and the Awakening2 voices

A commentator

John Wesley

1703–1791

Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)

Beelzebub signifies the Lord of flies, a title which the heathens gave to Jupiter, whom they accounted the chief of their gods, and yet supposed him to be employed in driving away flies from their temple and sacrifices. The Philistines worshipped a deity under this name, as the God of Ekron: from hence the Jews took the name, and applied it to the chief of the devils.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

Now they would have it thought, or said at least, that there was a correspondence settled between Christ and the devil, that the devil should have the advantage in the main and be victorious at last, but that in order hereto, in particular instances, he should yield Christ the advantage and retire by consent.

The Nineteenth Century2 voices

The connection between these verses and those which immediately precede them, is striking and instructive. In the preceding verses, our Lord Jesus Christ had been showing the power and importance of prayer. In the verses before us, he delivers a man from a 'mute' devil. The miracle is evidently intended to throw fresh light on the lesson. The same Savior who encourages us to pray — is the Savior who destroys Satan's power over our members, and restores our tongues to their proper use.
The connection between these verses and those which immediately precede them, is striking and instructive. In the preceding verses, our Lord Jesus Christ had been showing the power and importance of prayer. In the verses before us, he delivers a man from a 'mute' devil. The miracle is evidently intended to throw fresh light on the lesson. The same Savior who encourages us to pray — is the Savior who destroys Satan's power over our members, and restores our tongues to their proper use. Let us notice, firstly, in these verses — the variety of ways in which Satan exhibits his desire to injure man. We read of a 'mute' devil. Sometimes in the Gospel we are told of an "unclean" devil. Sometimes we are told of a raging and violent devil. Here we are told of one under whose influence the unhappy person possessed by him became mute. Many are the devices of Satan. It is foolish to suppose that he always works in the same manner. One thing alone is the common mark of all his operations — he delights to inflict injury and do harm! There is something very instructive in the case before us. Do we suppose, because bodily possession by Satan is not so glaringly manifest as it once was — that the great enemy is less active in doing mischief than he used to be? If we think so — then we have much to learn. Do we suppose that there is no such thing as the influence of a mute devil in the present day? If we do, we had better think again. What shall we say of those who never speak to God, who never use their tongues in prayer and praise, who never employ that organ which is a man's "glory," in the service of Him who made it? What shall we say, in a word, of those who can speak to everyone but God? What can we say, but that Satan has stripped them of the truest use of a tongue? What ought we to say, but that they are possessed with a mute devil?

The words behind it

14 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    John 10:20

    Many of them said, “He is demon-possessed and insane. Why would you listen to Him?”

    it leads to

    • John 7:20

      “You have a demon,” the crowd replied. “Who is trying to kill You?”

      Reached by 3 separate paths from here.

    • John 8:52

      “Now we know that You have a demon!” declared the Jews. “Abraham died, and so did the prophets, yet You say that anyone who keeps Your word will never taste death.

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

  • Through

    Matthew 9:34

    But the Pharisees said, “It is by the prince of demons that He drives out demons.”

    it leads to

    • Mark 3:22

      And the scribes who had come down from Jerusalem were saying, “He is possessed by Beelzebul,” and, “By the prince of the demons He drives out demons.”

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Matthew 12:23–24

      The crowds were astounded and asked, “Could this be the Son of David?”

    • John 3:20

      Everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come into the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.

  • Through

    Matthew 10:25

    It is enough for a disciple to be like his teacher, and a servant like his master. If the head of the house has been called Beelzebul, how much more the members of his…

    it leads to

    • John 8:48

      The Jews answered Him, “Are we not right to say that You are a Samaritan and You have a demon?”

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Matthew 12:24

      But when the Pharisees heard this, they said, “Only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, does this man drive out demons.”

    • Matthew 9:34

      But the Pharisees said, “It is by the prince of demons that He drives out demons.”

Where this verse is studied

On this page

About Luke

The Return of the Prodigal Son, Gustave Doré. Public domain.
The Return of the Prodigal Son, Gustave Doré. Public domain.
This page draws on 11 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Bede, On the Gospel of Luke; Bede, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Bonaventure, Commentary on Luke, Chapter 11; Cyril of Alexandria, Commentary on the Gospel of Luke, Sermon 80; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Luke (lightly modernized text, Grace Gems edition); Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Luke.