Skip to content
mannafest.faith

1 Corinthians 7:15

in 1 Corinthians 7

But if the unbeliever leaves, let him go. The believing brother or sister is not bound in such cases. God has called you to live in peace.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

Yet if the unbelieving departeth, let him depart: the brother or the sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us in peace.

KJV

But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace.

This verse in 1 Corinthians 7

Commentary

16 notes on this verse

A commentator

Tertullian

To His Wife Book II · Written before 220.

Accordingly he subjoins withal a reason, that "we are called in peace unto the Lord God; "and that "the unbeliever may, through the use of matrimony, be gained by the believer." The very closing sentence of the period confirms (the supposition) that this is thus to be understood.

This site's exposition

But if the unbeliever leaves, let him go

on 1 Corinthians 7:15-16

Where the unbeliever chooses to leave, Paul says let him go, and The believing brother or sister is not bound in such cases, for God has called you to live in peace. Later theology names this the Pauline privilege, set beside the exception Jesus himself allowed. Verse 16 turns the hard case toward hope, How do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband?, so the believer's presence may yet win the other.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers4 voices

A commentator

Ambrosiaster

COMMENTARY ON PAUL'S EPISTLES · Written before 384.

proposed

A marriage contracted without devotion to God is not binding, and for that reason it is not a sin if it is abandoned because of God. But the unbelieving partner sins both against God and against the marriage, because he or she is unwilling to …

A commentator

Theodoret of Cyrus

COMMENTARY ON THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS 205 · Written before 458.

proposed

The believing partner is not to be the cause of the divorce. But if the unbelieving partner wants to separate, the believing partner is innocent and free from any accusation.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on 1 Corinthians 19 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

"Yet if the unbelieving departeth, let him depart," for in this case the matter is no longer fornication. But what is the meaning of, "if the unbelieving departeth?" For instance, if he bid thee sacrifice and take part in his ungodliness on account of thy marriage, or else part company; it were better the marriage were annulled, and no breach made in godliness. Wherefore he adds, "A brother is not under bondage, nor yet a sister, in such cases." If day by day he buffet thee and keep up combats on this account, it is better to separate. For this is what he glances at, saying, "But God hath called us in peace." For it is the other party who furnished the ground of separation, even as he did who committed uncleanness.

A commentator

Augustine of Hippo

EIGHT QUESTIONS OF DULCITIUS 1 · Written in the 5th century.

proposed

A Christian husband may leave his wife without any blame, even if they are lawfully married, if she refuses to live with him because he is a Christian.

The Medieval Church1 voice

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on 1 Corinthians · Written before 1107.

proposed

If your husband quarrels with you because you do not take part in his unbelief, then divorce him. For you are not enslaved to him in such a case, that is, you are not compelled to follow him in such matters as well. It is …
9 more voices on this verse

The Medieval Church1 voice

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on 1 Corinthians · Written before 1107.

proposed

For example, if he commands you either to participate in his unbelief, or to renounce the rights of marriage, then divorce. For it is better to dissolve the bonds of marriage than to violate piety.

The Puritans and the Awakening5 voices

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

In such a case the deserted person must be free to marry again, and it is granted on all hands. And some think that such a malicious desertion is as much a dissolution of the marriage-covenant as death itself. For how is it possible that the two shall be one flesh when the one is maliciously bent to part from or put away the other?

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

Note, It should be the labour and study of those who are married to make each other as easy and happy as possible. (3.) A third reason is that it is possible for the believing relative to be an instrument of the other's salvation (

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — unbalanced-parens

A commentator

John Wesley

1703–1791

Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)

proposed

A brother or a sister - A Christian man or woman. Is not enslaved - is at full liberty. In such cases: but God hath called us to peace - To live peaceably with them, if it be possible.
But if the unbelieving depart,....

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

proposed

He shows them that becoming Christians does not change their external state; and therefore advises every one to continue, in the general, in that state in which he was called,

The Nineteenth Century3 voices

But if the unbelieving depart - If they choose to leave you. Let him depart - You cannot prevent it, and you are to submit to it patiently, and bear it as a Christian. A brother or a sister is not under bondage ... - Many have supposed that this means that they would be at liberty to marry again when the unbelieving wife or husband had gone away; as Calvin, Grotius, Rosenmuller, etc. But this is contrary to the strain of the argument of the apostle.

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

proposed

if . . . depart--that is, wishes for separation. Translate, "separateth himself": offended with her Christianity, and refusing to live with her unless she renounce it. brother or a sister is not under bondage--is not bound to renounce the faith for the sake of retaining her unbelieving husband [HAMMOND].

quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — starts-lowercase

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

But if the unbelieving, depart - Whether husband or wife: if such obstinately depart and utterly refuse all cohabitation, a brother or a sister - a Christian man or woman, is not under bondage to any particular laws, so as to be prevented from remarrying. Such, probably, the law stood then; but it is not so now; for the marriage can only be dissolved by death, or by the ecclesiastical court. Even fornication or adultery does not dissolve the marriage contract; nor will the obstinate separation of any of the parties, however long continued, give the party abandoned authority to remarry. If the person have been beyond sea, and not heard of for seven years, it is presumed he may be dead; and marriage has been connived at in such cases. If there be no person to complain, it may be presumed that there is none injured. But I have known instances where even a marriage after seven years’ absence has been very unfortunate; the husband returning at the end of ten or twelve years, and to his utter distress finding his wife married to another man, and with issue of that marriage! There can be no safety in this case, unless there be absolute certainty of the death of the party in question. God hath called us to peace - The refractory and disagreeing party should not be compelled to fulfill such matrimonial engagements as would produce continual jarring and discord. At the same time each should take care that he give no cause for disagreements and separations, for the author of the Christian religion is the author of peace, and has called us to it.

The words behind it

23 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

8 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Romans 12:18

    If it is possible on your part, live at peace with everyone.

    it leads to

    • Hebrews 12:14

      Pursue peace with everyone, as well as holiness, without which no one will see the Lord.

      Reached by 3 separate paths from here.

    • Romans 14:19

      So then, let us pursue what leads to peace and to mutual edification.

    • Matthew 5:9

      Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God.

    • 2 Corinthians 13:11

      Finally, brothers, rejoice! Aim for perfect harmony, encourage one another, be of one mind, live in peace. And the God of love and peace will be with you.

    • James 3:16–18

      For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every evil practice.

  • Through

    Romans 14:19

    So then, let us pursue what leads to peace and to mutual edification.

    it leads to

    • Romans 12:18

      If it is possible on your part, live at peace with everyone.

      Reached by 2 separate paths from here.

    • Ephesians 4:29

      Let no unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building up the one in need and bringing grace to those who listen.

  • Through

    Matthew 12:50

    For whoever does the will of My Father in heaven is My brother and sister and mother.”

    it leads to

    • Luke 8:21

      But He replied, “My mother and brothers are those who hear the word of God and carry it out.”

Where this verse is studied

About 1 Corinthians

The Crucifixion, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
The Crucifixion, Gustave Doré, 1866. Public domain.
This page draws on 13 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the First Epistle to the Corinthians; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Ambrosiaster, COMMENTARY ON PAUL'S EPISTLES; Augustine of Hippo, EIGHT QUESTIONS OF DULCITIUS 1; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homily on 1 Corinthians 19; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Tertullian, To His Wife Book II; Theodoret of Cyrus, COMMENTARY ON THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS 205 and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on 1 Corinthians.