Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Scripture: The text alone. Study: The verses explained. Original: The Hebrew and Greek, and the tradition.

Deuteronomychapter 17

20 verses · BSBDeuteronomy book hub →

Key verse

When you enter the land that the LORD your God is giving you and have taken possession of it and settled in it, and you say, “Let us set a king over us like all the nations around us,”

It stands in A king who copies out the law by hand, verses 14 to 20.

The chapter

Chapter summary

Courts and the king. Sentences not resolved in the gates shall come up to the priests and the judge at the central place. Their verdict binding. Should Israel ask for a king, three strictures: no multiplying horses (no return to Egypt); no multiplying wives (his heart turn not away); no multiplying silver and gold. The king shall write for himself a copy of this law in a book from the priests' original: ‘and it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life: that he may learn to fear the LORD his God’. The chapter anticipates the kingship of Israel's later centuries; every king is to be a covenant reader.

Context

Law · Moses · Deuteronomy overview

The world behind this chapter

Deuteronomy 17
When
The fortieth year after the Exodus, the offices of the nation set out before it has them · About 1406 BC on the early Exodus frame this site keeps, about four hundred years before Israel asked for a king at 1 Samuel 8:5
Where
The plains of Moab, with the courts set at the town gates and a supreme court at a sanctuary not yet chosen
Who first heard it
A people with no king, no capital and no standing court

The history

The speech is Moses in the first person, and the chapter builds offices for a nation that does not yet hold the land.

The setting is the plain east of the Jordan in the fortieth year, at about 1406 BC on the frame this site keeps. The request for a king that verse 14 anticipates is made at 1 Samuel 8:5, centuries later.

The rest of the history, and what it meant to them

The occasion is the appointment of judges at 16:18. This chapter says what those judges do, what happens when a case is too hard for them, and what a king may and may not be.

A first hearer knew the gate as the courthouse. Sentence was carried out there because the whole town could take part, which Albert Barnes ties to the place itself.

He knew what a witness risked. Verse 7 puts the first stones in the hands of the witnesses, and the older commentators read that as a brake on a false charge.

He knew that Egypt was the horse market of the region. The account at 1 Kings 10:28-29 later prices a chariot out of Egypt at six hundred shekels of silver and a horse at a hundred and fifty.

He knew what it cost to copy a scroll by hand, which is what verse 18 asks of a king from the day he takes the throne.

What it meant to them

The chapter gave a people without institutions the shape of the ones they would need, from a bench at a town gate up to a court of appeal.

It refused to let one voice take a life, and it made the accuser throw the first stone.

The law of the king came before Israel had one, and it put the throne under the same book as the man in the field. The record in 1 Kings 10 and 11 reads like a ledger kept against verses 16 and 17.

Sources cited

  • The site's published exposition of Deuteronomy 17, in the store
  • Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible , 1871
  • Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible , 1710

Every work MannaFest builds on →

Where the chapter sits

Deuteronomy 17 falls in Second sermon, the law restated (chapters 5–26). The Decalogue repeated; the Shema; laws for the land, for worship, for kingship, for war, for the poor. The covenant's central exposition.

Before it: First sermon, retrospective, chapters 1–4. After it: Third sermon, blessings and curses, chapters 27–30.

The whole shape of Deuteronomy

The structure of this chapter

The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.

A. Two or three witnesses before a stoning

1. (v. 1)

Deuteronomy 17:1

This verse belongs in subject to the last chapter. It prohibits once more (compare Deu 15:21) that form of insult to God which consists in offering to Him a blemished sacrifice. Any evil-favoredness - Render any evil thing. The reference is to the faults or maims enumerated in Lev 22:22-24.

1 more voice on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.

Deuteronomy 17:1

God is the best of beings, and therefore whatsoever he is served with ought to be the best in its kind. And the Old-Testament sacrifices in a special manner must be so, because they were types of Christ, who is a Lamb without blemish or spot ( 1 Pet. i. 19 ), perfectly pure from all sin and all appearance of it.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

The whole record on this verse

This rule belongs in subject with the altar material of the previous chapter, and Deuteronomy 15:21 had already forbidden the blemished offering. Leviticus 22:22-24 lists the faults meant, the blind, the broken, the maimed, the running sore. Malachi 1:8 charges a later generation with breaking this exact rule and asks whether their own governor would take such a gift. Matthew Henry reads the requirement through 1 Peter 1:19, where Christ is the lamb without blemish and without spot.

2. (vv. 2-4)

Deuteronomy 17:2

It was on this condition that God took them to be his peculiar people, that they should serve and worship him only as their God, so that if they gave to any other the honour which was due to him alone that covenant was void, and all the benefit of it forfeited. Other sins were transgressions of the command, but this was a transgression of the covenant.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

1 more voice on this verse

Deuteronomy 17:2

Compare Deu 13:1 ff. Here special reference is made to the legal forms to be adopted, Deu 17:5-7. The sentence was to be carried into effect at “the gates” (compare Gen 19:1 note) of the town in which the crime was committed; because, as “all the people” were to take a part, an open space would be requisite for the execution. Note the typical and prophetical aspect of the injunction; compare Act 7:58; Heb 13:12.

The whole record on this verse

Deuteronomy 17:3

The host of heaven - Those glorious creatures, which are to be admired as the wonderful works of God, but not to be set up in God's stead. By condemning the most specious of all idolaters, he intimates, how absurd a thing it is to worship stocks and stones, the works of men's hands. I have not commanded - That is, I have forbidden.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The offence is idolatry and the text files it as transgressing his covenant, which makes it the breach of an agreement rather than the breach of a single command. Sun, moon and the host of heaven are named as its objects, the worship Deuteronomy 4:19 had already warned against and the worship 2 Kings 21:3-5 lays at Manasseh's door. Before anything is done the charge must be told, heard, enquired into diligently, and found true and certain, the same steps Deuteronomy 13:14 required before a whole city could be judged. Matthew Henry marks what the covenant frame changes, that other sins broke a command while this one broke the terms on which Israel was taken as a people.

3. (vv. 5-6)

Deuteronomy 17:6

Two witnesses - One might be deceived, or be prejudiced or malicious; therefore God required two substantial witnesses for the support of the charge.

1 more voice on this verse

Deuteronomy 17:6

Witnesses - Namely, credible and competent witnesses. The Jews rejected the testimonies of children, women, servants, familiar friends or enemies, persons of dissolute lives or evil fame.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The whole record on this verse

Sentence is carried out at the gates, the open ground where a town did its legal business, and Albert Barnes ties the choice of place to the fact that all the people had to be able to take part. Two or three witnesses are required in a capital case, and Numbers 35:30 lays the same floor on a charge of murder. Hebrews 10:28 quotes this verse, that he who despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses, and the same number governs church discipline at Matthew 18:16, 2 Corinthians 13:1 and 1 Timothy 5:19.

4. (v. 7)

Deuteronomy 17:7

First upon him - God thus ordered it, for the caution of witnesses, that, if they had thro' malice or wrath accused him falsely, they might now be afraid to imbrue their hands in innocent blood; and for the security and satisfaction of the people in the execution of this punishment.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

Deuteronomy 17:7

The men who gave the testimony throw the first stones, and the crowd follows them. Commentators from Gill onward read the order as a brake on false accusation, since a witness who had lied would be the first to shed the blood he called for. Acts 7:58 shows the rule working at Stephen's death, where the witnesses laid down their clothes at the feet of Saul, and John 8:7 puts the first stone in the hand of whoever is without sin. The closing line, so thou shalt put the evil away from among you, recurs through this book, and 1 Corinthians 5:13 quotes it of a man inside a church.

B. Too hard for you? Go up to the place he chooses

1. (vv. 8-9)

Deuteronomy 17:8

If there arise a matter too hard for thee - These directions are given to the common magistrates, who might not be able to judge of or apply the law in all cases that might be brought before them. The priests and Levites, who were lawyers by birth and continual practice, were reasonably considered as the best qualified to decide on difficult points.

1 more voice on this verse

Deuteronomy 17:8

For thee - He speaks to the inferior magistrates, who were erected in several cities. If thou hast not skill to determine, between blood and blood - That is, in capital causes.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The whole record on this verse

Deuteronomy 17:9

And he may be distinctly named, tho' he be one of the priests, because of his eminency, and to shew that amongst the priests, he especially was to be consulted in such cases. The sentence of judgment - Hebrew. The word, or matter of judgement, that is, the true state of the cause, and what judgment or sentence ought to be given in it.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The hard case goes up to the place which the Lord thy God shall choose, a phrase this book uses fifteen times between chapters 12 and 26 and never once attaches to a named town. Deuteronomy 1:17 had told the local judges to bring the cause too hard for them to Moses, and this statute puts a standing court where Moses had stood. The bench is the priests the Levites together with the judge that shall be in those days, and it hears what verse 8 calls blood and blood, plea and plea, stroke and stroke. Jamieson, Fausset and Brown identify the later form of this tribunal with the Sanhedrin.

2. (vv. 10-11)

Deuteronomy 17:10

And thou shalt do according to the sentence which they of that place which the Lord shall choose shall show thee,....

Deuteronomy 17:11

Just as a person has to pick his way between fire and water so as to be neither burned nor drowned, so we should steer our way between the pinnacle of pride and the whirlpool of sloth, as it is written, "turning neither to the right nor to the left." For there are some who, through fear of being carried up to the heights on the right, slip and are drowned on the left. Others … fear to be sucked in by the soft ease of sloth on the left and are ruined and destroyed by the ostentation of boasting on the other side, and [they] vanish into smoke and ashes.

Augustine of Hippo· written before 430· LETTER 48patristic

1 more voice on this verse

Deuteronomy 17:11

According to the sentence of the law which they shall teach thee,....

The ruling binds, and the words about declining neither to the right hand nor to the left are the words laid on the whole nation at Deuteronomy 5:32 and on the king himself at verse 20. Rabbinic tradition rested the standing authority of its own courts on these two verses, and readers have long differed over how far one ruling reaches past the case that produced it. Matthew 23:2-3 has Jesus telling the crowd to do what those who sit in Moses' seat bid them, while warning them off copying what those men do.

3. (vv. 12-13)

Deuteronomy 17:12

To differ in opinion from weakness and infirmity may be excused and must be borne with; but to do so presumptuously, in pride and wickedness (as the ancient translations explain it), this is to take up arms against the government, and is an affront to him by whom the powers that be are ordained.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Refusing the court's decision is capital, and the word is presumptuously, which carries the distinction Numbers 15:30 draws between a sin of ignorance and a sin done with a high hand. Adam Clarke reads the offence as rebellion against the highest authority in the land, and Matthew Henry allows that honest difference of opinion from weakness is a separate thing and must be borne with. Verse 13 states the purpose, that all the people shall hear, and fear, and do no more presumptuously, a formula this book repeats at 13:11, 19:20 and 21:21.

C. A king who copies out the law by hand

1. (vv. 14-15)

Deuteronomy 17:14

Their having a king is neither promised as a mercy nor commanded as a duty (nothing could be better for them than the divine regimen they were under), but it is permitted them if they desired it.

Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan

Deuteronomy 17:15

God reserved to himself the nomination both of the family, and of the person. Thy brethren -- of the same nation and religion; because such a person was most likely to maintain true religion, and to rule with righteousness, gentleness, and kindness to his subjects; and that he might be a fit type of Christ their supreme king, who was to be one of their brethren.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The request is quoted back almost word for word at 1 Samuel 8:5 and 8:20, where Israel asks for a king to judge us like all the nations. Matthew Henry reads the law as permission rather than promise, since the conditions in the verses that follow assume the request will one day be made and granted. The choice belongs to God and the man must come from among thy brethren, which is what 1 Samuel 10:24 and 16:1 show happening. Albert Barnes notes that later Jewish reading stretched the ban on a stranger to cover every office, which is part of what gave the question about tribute to Caesar at Matthew 22:17 its edge.

2. (v. 16)

Deuteronomy 17:16

He shall not multiply horses - Tho' he might have horses for his own use, yet he was not to have many horses for his officers and guard, much less for war, lest he should trust in them. The multiplying horses is also forbidden, lest it should raise too great a correspondence with Egypt which furnished Canaan with them.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

The first prohibition has two halves, the horses and the road they would be fetched along. Egypt was the horse market of the region, and 1 Kings 10:28-29 says Solomon's horses were brought out of Egypt, a chariot at six hundred shekels of silver and a horse at a hundred and fifty. The clause forasmuch as the Lord hath said unto you points back to Exodus 14:13, where Israel was told it would see the Egyptians again no more for ever. Adam Clarke gives two grounds for the rule, the traffic with Egypt itself and the confidence a mounted army invites, which is what Psalm 20:7 and Isaiah 31:1 press.

3. (v. 17)

Deuteronomy 17:17

Multiplication of wives would lead to sensuality, and so to an apostasy no less fatal in effect than downright idolatry (compare Exo 34:16). This rule, like the others, abridges to the ruler of Israel liberties usually enjoyed without stint by the kings of the East. The restriction was in the days of Moses unprecedented; and demanded a higher standard in the king of Israel than was looked for among his equals in other nations. Neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold - In this third prohibition, as in the other two, excess is forbidden.

1 more voice on this verse

Deuteronomy 17:17

The mischievous effects resulting from the breach of this condition were exemplified in the history of Solomon and other princes, who, by trampling on the restrictive law, corrupted themselves as well as the nation. neither shall he greatly multiply . . . silver and gold--that is, the kings were forbidden to accumulate money for private purposes.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed

The whole record on this verse

Two more prohibitions, and the text supplies the reason for the first of them, that his heart turn not away. The account at 1 Kings 11:1-4 gives Solomon seven hundred wives and three hundred concubines and then says his wives turned away his heart, which is the exact ground this verse states. On the third clause, 1 Kings 10:14 counts six hundred threescore and six talents of gold coming in during a single year and 1 Kings 10:27 says the king made silver to be in Jerusalem as stones. Albert Barnes reads all three clauses as forbidding excess rather than possession, since the king plainly had horses, a wife and a treasury.

4. (v. 18)

Deuteronomy 17:18

He shall write - With his own hand, as the Jews say. Out of that - Out of the original, which was carefully kept by the priests in the sanctuary, that it might be a perfect copy, and that it might have the greater influence upon him, coming to him as from the hand and presence of God.

John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (1765)evangelical

1 more voice on this verse

Deuteronomy 17:18

He shall write him a copy of this law - משנה התורה הזאת mishneh hattorah hazzoth, an iteration or duplicate of this law; translated by the Septuagint, το δευτερονομιον τουτο this deuteronomy. From this version both the Vulgate Latin and all the modern versions have taken the name of this book; and from the original word the Jews call it Mishneh. See the preface to this book.

The whole record on this verse

The king copies the law out from the master text held by the priests the Levites, and the Jewish tradition Adam Clarke reports has him do it with his own hand rather than a scribe's. The Hebrew behind a copy of this law is mishneh hattorah, which the Septuagint rendered to deuteronomion touto, and the name of the whole book came into Latin and English from that rendering. Matthew Henry weighs what the demand costs a man whose hands are full of a kingdom's business from the day he takes the throne. 2 Kings 11:12 puts the testimony into the hands of Joash at his crowning, and 2 Kings 22 has Josiah hearing a book of the law that had gone missing.

5. (vv. 19-20)

Deuteronomy 17:19

And it shall be with him, etc. - It was the surest way to bring the king to an acquaintance with the Divine law to oblige him to write out a fair copy of it with his own hand, in which he was to read daily. This was essentially necessary, as these laws of God were all permanent, and no Israelitish king could make any new law, the kings of this people being ever considered as only the vice-gerents of Jehovah.

Deuteronomy 17:20

He, and his children, in the midst of Israel - From this verse it has been inferred that the crown of Israel was designed to be hereditary, and this is very probable; for long experience has proved to almost all the nations of the world that hereditary succession in the regal government is, on the whole, the safest, and best calculated to secure the public tranquillity.

He reads in it all the days of his life, and the stated purpose is that he may learn to fear the Lord his God, so the king is a pupil of the law before he is its enforcer. Verse 20 gives the second purpose, that his heart be not lifted up above his brethren, which puts the throne under the same book as the man in the field. Turning aside neither to the right hand nor to the left has already been laid on the nation at Deuteronomy 5:32 and on the courts at verse 11, and Joshua 1:7-8 lays it on Moses' successor with this same book in view. The promise attached is length of days for him and for his children in the midst of Israel, and 1 Kings 11:11-13 is where that promise gets measured against Solomon.

This page carries no textual note on Deuteronomy 17. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →

Sources for this chapter

The summary

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.

The exposition

Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes on the Old Testament; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Gill, Exposition of the Old Testament; Keil and Delitzsch, Biblical Commentary on the Old Testament: The Pentateuch and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.

Keep studying