Actschapter 25
27 verses · BSBActs book hub →
Speaks with:Acts 25×16Acts 24×8Acts 23×6Acts 26×4Acts 9×2Matthew 27×2
Summary
Chapter summary
Before Festus; Paul appeals to Caesar: 'I stand at Caesar's judgment seat, where I ought to be judged.' Agrippa and Bernice visit Festus, who lays the case before the king.
Context
History · Luke — Acts overview
- A. 1–12 I Appeal Unto Caesar
- B. 13–27 Festus Lays the Case Before King Agrippa
The outline
A.I Appeal Unto Caesarvv. 1 to 12
Read vv. 1 to 12 →B.Festus Lays the Case Before King Agrippavv. 13 to 27
Read vv. 13 to 27 →
The world behind this chapter
Acts 25The history
Porcius Festus replaced Felix and, by the accounts we have, was a more competent and fairer administrator, though he died in office within a couple of years. A new governor traditionally toured his province and cleared inherited cases, which is why Paul's file surfaces within days of his arrival.
The request to move the trial to Jerusalem was a trap — an ambush was planned on the road — but Festus's refusal rests on procedure: a Roman citizen is tried where the governor's court sits, and it is not Roman custom to hand a man over before he has faced his accusers.
The appeal to Caesar was a right attached to citizenship. Once a citizen invoked it, the local court lost jurisdiction and the case had to go to Rome. It was not a plea for mercy but a transfer of venue, and Festus's terse "to Caesar you shall go" reflects that he no longer had a choice.
Agrippa II was the last of the Herods, ruler of territories north and east of Galilee, and Rome had given him oversight of the temple and the right to appoint high priests. Bernice was his sister; their relationship was the subject of ugly gossip in Rome. Festus consults him because he needs to write charges he cannot articulate, and Agrippa was the nearest expert on Jewish religion with Roman standing.
What it meant to them
For the first readers, Festus's private admission was the heart of it: the dispute was about a dead man named Jesus whom Paul asserted to be alive. A Roman governor could not name a crime in that, only a puzzle.
The appeal also answered a nagging question — why did Paul reach Rome as a prisoner? Not because Rome condemned him, but because he used a citizen's right to escape a rigged venue. The promise that he would testify in Rome comes true through ordinary legal machinery.
Sources cited
- F. F. Bruce, The Book of the Acts (NICNT)
- Flavius Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews
The text of this chapter
This page carries no textual note on Acts 25. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →
This page draws on Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
