Skip to content
mannafest.faith

Acts 9:9

in Acts 9

For three days he was without sight, and he did not eat or drink anything.

BSB

The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾

ASV

And he was three days without sight, and did neither eat nor drink.

KJV

And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink.

This verse in Acts 9

Commentary

18 notes on this verse
And neither did eat nor drink - Probably because he was overwhelmed with a view of his sins, and was thus indisposed to eat. All the circumstances would contribute to this. His past life; his great sins; the sudden change in his views; his total absorption in the vision; perhaps also his grief at the loss of his sight, would all fill his mind, and indispose him to partake of food. Great grief always produces this effect.

This site's exposition

stood there speechless

on Acts 9:7-9

The men with Saul stood there speechless and heard the voice but did not see anyone, while 22:9 says they did not understand it. The Greek puts voice in a different case in each verse.

This site's exposition

he did not eat or drink

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown count the three days in the Hebrew way, as parts of three days. Albert Barnes and Theophylact trace the fast to grief over his sins, and Theophylact adds that Saul prayed for forgiveness. Bede links the three days to the resurrection Saul had denied.

The record, by era

The Church Fathers5 voices

A commentator

Oecumenius

Commentary on Acts · Written before 550.

proposed

Because he judged himself most harshly over the persecution of the Church, and, grieved, he begged God to be forgiven.
And again it is written concerning Paul, that before he was baptized, and received the Holy Spirit, he neither ate nor drank for three days, nor rose up from his place, because he was lying upon his face praying, and thus he received the Holy …

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 19 · Written before 407.

proposed

And for three days he neither did eat nor drink, being blinded. What could equal this? To compensate the discouragement in the matter of Stephen, here is encouragement, in the bringing in of Paul: though that sadness had its consolation in the fact of Stephen's making such an end, yet it also received this further consolation: moreover, the bringing in of the villages of the Samaritans afforded very great comfort.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 19 · Written before 407.

proposed

But why did this take place not at the very first, but after these things? That it might be shown that Christ was indeed risen. This furious assailant of Christ, the man who would not believe in His death and resurrection, the persecutor of His disciples, how should this man have become a believer, had not the power of His resurrection been great indeed?

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 19 · Written before 407.

proposed

And he eat not, neither drank: he condemned himself for the past, he confessed, prayed, besought God. But should any say, This was the effect of compulsion: we answer, The same thing happened to Elymas: then how came it that he was not changed? What evidence could be more compulsory than the earthquake at the Resurrection, the report of the soldiers, the other miracles, the seeing Himself risen? But these things do not compel belief, they are calculated to teach it.
10 more voices on this verse

The Church Fathers3 voices

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 19 · Written before 407.

proposed

Why did not the Jews believe when they were told of these things? That he spoke truth was manifest: for he would not have been changed, had this not happened; so that all were bound to believe. He was not inferior to them that preached the Resurrection, and was more credible, by being all at once converted. He had no intercourse with any of the believers; it was at Damascus that he was converted, or rather before he came to Damascus that this happened to him.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 19 · Written before 407.

proposed

I ask the Jew: Say, by what was Paul converted? He saw so many signs, and was not converted: his teacher Gamaliel was converted, and he remained unconverted. Who convinced him-and not only convinced, but all at once inspired him with such ardent zeal? Wherefore was it, that he wished even to go into hell itself for Christ's sake? The truth of the facts is manifest.

A commentator

John Chrysostom

Homily on Acts 19 · Written before 407.

proposed

Be it so, that the other Apostles favored His pretensions: what say you to this man? Why then not immediately after His resurrection? That his hostility might be more clearly shown as open war. The man who is so frantic as even to shed blood and cast men into prisons, all at once believes! It was not enough that he had never been in Christ's company: the believers must be warred upon by him with vehement hostility: he left to none the possibility of going beyond him in fury: none of them all could be so violent.

The Medieval Church2 voices

A commentator

Bede

Commentary on Acts · Written before 735.

proposed

And he was without sight for three days. Because he had not believed that the Lord had conquered death by rising on the third day, he is now instructed by his own example, who would change the darkness of three days with the returning light.

A commentator

Theophylact of Ohrid

Commentary on Acts · Written before 1107.

proposed

"And for three days he did not see, and did not eat, and did not drink." Why did he do this? Because he greatly repented of having persecuted the Church, and he grieved, and prayed, and besought God that this might be forgiven him.

The Puritans and the Awakening3 voices

A commentator

John Wesley

1703–1791

Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)

And he was three days - An important season! So long he seems to have been in the pangs of the new birth. Without sight - By scales growing over his eyes, to intimate to him the blindness of the state he had been in, to impress him with a deeper sense of the almighty power of Christ, and to turn his thoughts inward, while he was less capable of conversing with outward objects.

A commentator

Matthew Henry

1662–1714

Commentary on the Whole Bible (1710)

It was not so much this glaring light that, by dazzling his eyes, had dimmed them--Nimium sensibile lædit sensum; for then those with him would have lost their sight too; but it was a sight of Christ, whom the rest saw not, that had this effect upon him. Thus a believing sight of the glory of God in the face of Christ dazzles the eyes to all things here below.
And he was three days without sight,....

The Nineteenth Century2 voices

A commentator

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown

1802–1910

Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)

And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink--that is, according to the Hebrew mode of computation: he took no food during the remainder of that day, the entire day following, and so much of the subsequent day as elapsed before the visit of Ananias.

A commentator

Adam Clarke

1762–1832

Commentary on the Bible · Written before 1832.

proposed

Neither did eat nor drink - The anxiety of his mind and the anguish of his heart were so great that he had no appetite for food; and he continued in total darkness and without food for three days, till Ananias proclaimed salvation to him in the name of the Lord Jesus.

The words behind it

11 Greek words

Every Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.

A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.

The walk

5 stops

Each card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.

  • Through

    Esther 4:16

    “Go and assemble all the Jews who can be found in Susa, and fast for me. Do not eat or drink for three days, night or day, and I and my maidens will fast…

    it leads to

    • Acts 20:24

      But I consider my life of no value to me, if only I may finish my course and complete the ministry I have received from the Lord Jesus—the ministry of testifying to the good…

    • 2 Chronicles 20:3

      Jehoshaphat was alarmed and set his face to seek the LORD. And he proclaimed a fast throughout Judah.

    • Joel 2:12–17

      “Yet even now,” declares the LORD, “return to Me with all your heart, with fasting, weeping, and mourning.”

    • Luke 9:24

      For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will save it.

    • Genesis 18:19

      For I have chosen him, so that he will command his children and his household after him to keep the way of the LORD by doing what is right and just, in order that…

Where this verse is studied

About Acts

The Pentecost, El Greco, about 1600, Museo del Prado. Public domain.
The Pentecost, El Greco, about 1600, Museo del Prado. Public domain.
This page draws on 12 works. Open the list of works

This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Bede, Commentary on Acts; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homily on Acts 19; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Oecumenius, Commentary on Acts; Philoxenus of Mabbug, 13 Ascetic Discourses, Discourse 11 -- On Abstinence and Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Acts.