Matthewchapter 2
23 verses · Matthew, by tradition · AD 50 to 65 · The Gospels
Key verse
And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.
It stands in Wise Men Follow the Star to the Child, verses 1 to 12.
The chapter
Chapter summary
Magi from the east follow the star to Herod's Jerusalem, then to Bethlehem. Gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh. Joseph's flight to Egypt with the child, Herod's slaughter of the innocents at Bethlehem, and the return to Nazareth. Three fulfillment formulas close the chapter (Mic 5:2; Hos 11:1; Jer 31:15).
Context
Gospel · Matthew · Matthew overview
The world behind this chapter
Matthew 2The history
The magi were not kings and the text never numbers them. The word describes a priestly class of scholars from the east, Persia or Babylon, who studied the stars, interpreted dreams, and advised royal courts. A large Jewish community had lived in Babylon since the exile, so Hebrew prophecy was known in that world.
The rest of the history, and what it meant to them
Herod the Great was a client king: Rome let him rule Judea so long as he kept it quiet and paid up. He was a spectacular builder and a murderous paranoid. Josephus records that he executed his wife Mariamne and three of his own sons on suspicion of plotting. Killing the infants of a small village fits everything else known about him.
Bethlehem was a village of perhaps a few hundred people. The number of boys under two would have been small, a dozen or so, which is why no Roman historian bothered to record it. It was one more local cruelty in a reign full of them.
Egypt was the obvious refuge. It lay outside Herod's jurisdiction, the journey was well travelled, and Alexandria held one of the largest Jewish populations in the world. On the return, Matthew notes that Herod's son Archelaus held Judea, a ruler so brutal that Rome removed him in AD 6, which is exactly why the family settled north in Galilee instead.
What it meant to them
A Jewish reader would feel the pattern immediately: a wicked king killing infant boys, a child preserved, a return out of Egypt. Matthew is putting Jesus where Moses stood, and behind Moses, Israel itself.
There is a sting in it, too. Foreign stargazers travelled for months to worship him; the chief priests could quote the right verse about Bethlehem without walking the six miles to look. Matthew's readers, pushed out by their own leaders, were being told the pattern started early.
Sources cited
- Flavius Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews (Whiston translation)
- Craig S. Keener, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament
Where the chapter sits
Matthew 2 falls in Prologue: genealogy, birth, preparation (chapters 1–4).
After it: Sermon on the Mount, chapters 5–7.
The whole shape of Matthew→The structure of this chapter
Threads running through this chapter
- Out of Egypt have I called my sonType, vv. 14 to 15
- The descent into EgyptPattern, v. 15
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
A. Wise Men Follow the Star to the Child
1. (vv. 1-2)
Matthew 2:1
“It is not known who these wise men were. Their names and dwelling-place are alike kept back from us. We are only told that they came “from the east.” Whether they were Chaldeans or Arabians we cannot say. Whether they learned to expect Christ from the ten tribes who went into captivity, or from the prophecies of Daniel, we do not know. It matters little who they were. The point which concerns us most is the rich instruction which their history conveys.”
J.C. Ryle· Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew (1856)Reformed Evangelical
3 more voices on this verseWhat preachers and commentators have said about this verse, in their own words.
Matthew 2:1
“We think the Evangelist first wrote, as we read in the Hebrew, 'Judah,' not 'Judæa.' For in what other country is there a Bethlehem, that this needs to be distinguished as in 'Judæa?' But 'Judah' is written, because there is another Bethlehem in Galilee. They knew that such a star would rise by the prophecy of Balaam, whose successors they were. But whether they were Chaldæans, or Persians, or came from the utmost ends of the earth, how in so short a space of time could they arrive at Jerusalem?”
Jerome· written before 420· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
Matthew 2:1
“It lay to the east of Judea, and was famous for gold, frankincense, and myrrh. We have seen his star - Undoubtedly they had before heard Balaam's prophecy. And probably when they saw this unusual star, it was revealed to them that this prophecy was fulfilled.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Matthew 2:1
“That truth that is tradition has wisely remembered them almost as unknown quantities, as mysterious as their mysterious and melodious names: Melchior, Caspar, Balthazar.”
G.K. Chesterton· The Everlasting Man, Part II Ch. 1 "The God in the Cave" (1925)High-Church Anglican
Matthew 2:2
“We have seen his star - Having discovered an unusual luminous appearance or meteor in the heavens, supposing these persons to have been Jews, and knowing the prophecies relative to the redemption of Israel, they probably considered this to be the star mentioned by Balaam, Num 24:17. See the note there. In the east - Εν τη ανατολη, At its rise. Ανατολη and δυσμη are used in the New Testament for east and west. To worship him - Or, To do him homage; προσκυνησαι αυτω.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 2:2
“Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews?--From this it would seem they were not themselves Jews. (Compare the language of the Roman governor, Joh 18:33, and of the Roman soldiers, Mt 27:29, with the very different language of the Jews themselves, Mt 27:42, &c.).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
wise men from the east: The wise men from the east are magoi, the Persian priestly-astronomer caste Daniel once governed in Babylon (Dan 2:48), and the bench has long read their arrival as fruit of the exile: a Gentile college that kept Balaam's Star oracle (Num 24:17) and Daniel's timetable until both pointed at Judea. The text itself gives no number, no names, no kingship; three is an inference from three gifts and the rest is later tradition. What Matthew states is the point: at the birth of Israel's King, the first worshippers are Gentiles asking directions from a Scripture they believed and Jerusalem did not open.
2. (vv. 3-4)
Matthew 2:3
“When Herod the king had heard these things, he was troubled--viewing this as a danger to his own throne: perhaps his guilty conscience also suggested other grounds of fear. and all Jerusalem with him--from a dread of revolutionary commotions, and perhaps also of Herod's rage.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:3
“He could not be a stranger to the prophecies of the Old Testament, concerning the Messiah and his kingdom, and the times fixed for his appearing by Daniel's weeks; but, having himself reigned so long and so successfully, he began to hope that those promises would for ever fail, and that his kingdom would be established and perpetuated in spite of them.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Matthew 2:3
“Had heard these things - Had heard of their coming, and of the star, and of the design of their coming. He was troubled - Herod had obtained the kingdom by great crimes, and by shedding much blood. He was therefore easily alarmed by any remarkable appearances; and the fact that this star appeared, and that it was regarded as proof that a King of the Jews was born, alarmed him. Besides, it was a common expectation that the Messiah was about to appear, and he feared that his reign was about to come to an end.”
Matthew 2:4
“As MEYER says, it was all the theologians of the nation whom Herod convened, because it was a theological response that he wanted. he demanded of them--as the authorized interpreters of Scripture. where Christ--the Messiah. should be born--according to prophecy.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 2:4
“Moreover, to add to the measure of their damnation, Him whom they despise now that He is born, they knew long beforehand would be born. And they knew not only that He would be born, but also where He would be born.”
Gregory the Dialogist· written before 604· Forty Gospel Homilies, Homily 10patristic
he was troubled: Herod was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him, and the commentators let the irony stand: the city of the great King shakes at the news that her King is born. Herod's fear is political, an Idumean on a contested throne hearing of a born King of the Jews; Jerusalem's fear is of Herod, whose jealousy had already killed a wife and three sons. The gathered chief priests and scribes answer the Messiah question instantly and accurately, which sets up the chapter's quiet indictment, since knowing the address and walking the five miles are different things.
3. (vv. 5-6)
Matthew 2:5
“And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judea--a prompt and involuntary testimony from the highest tribunal; which yet at length condemned Him to die. for thus it is written by the prophet-- (Mic 5:2).”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 2:5
“By the prophet - The Sanhedrin answered without hesitation. The question where he would be born had been settled by prophecy. This prophecy is found in Mic 5:2. In that prophecy both the place of his birth and the character of the Messiah are so clearly set forth that there was no room to doubt. It will be observed that there is a considerable difference between the passage as quoted by the Sanhedrin and as it stands in Micah. The main point, however, is retained - the place of his birth.”
Matthew 2:6
“And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda - To distinguish it from Bethlehem, in the tribe of Zebulon. Jos 19:15. See on Mat 2:1 (note). Art not the least - In Mic 5:2, it is read, Though thou be little - צעיר להיות tsdir lehayoth, little to be. Houbigant, struck with the oddness of the construction of the Hebrew, by dividing the last word, and making a small change in two of the letters, makes the prophet agree with the evangelist, צעיר לא היית ,tsilegna tsdir lo hayita, thou art not the least.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
4 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:6
“For thus it is written in the prophet: "And thou, Bethlehem, are not the least in the leaders of Judah: for out of thee shall issue a Leader who shall feed my People lsrµl." But if hitherto he has not been born, what "leader" was it who was thus announced as to proceed from the tribe of Judah, out of Bethlehem? For it behoves him to proceed from the tribe of Judah and from Bethlehem.”
Tertullian· written before 220· An Answer to the Jewspatristic
Matthew 2:6
“And thou Bethlehem in the land of Juda,.... This prophecy, which the chief priests and scribes produced, as pointing at the place of Christ's birth, is owned by both ancient and later Jews (y) to be a prophecy of the Messiah. The difference between Micah and Matthew is easily reconciled. Bethlehem is called by Micah, Bethlehem Ephratah, and by Matthew, Bethlehem in the land of Judah, and both were one and the same place.”
Matthew 2:6
“The classical writers use the same figure. The pastoral rule of Jehovah and Messiah over His people is a representation pervading all Scripture, and rich in import. That this prophecy of Micah referred to the Messiah, was admitted by the ancient Rabbins.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew 2:6
“When this and several other quotations from the Old Testament are compared with the original, it plainly appears, the apostles did not always think it necessary exactly to transcribe the passages they cited, but contented themselves with giving the general sense, though with some diversity of language.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Matthew 2:6
- QuotingMicah 5:2“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come forth for Me One to be ruler over Israel—One whose origins are of old, from the days of eternity.”
chief priests cite the birthplace prophecy to Herod ('for thus it is written by the prophet')
In Bethlehem of Judea: , the scribes answer, and they cite Micah 5:2 as settled messianic exegesis; this is the one fulfillment citation in the chapter spoken by Israel's own teachers rather than by the evangelist. Matthew's rendering differs from the Hebrew, which calls Bethlehem little among the thousands of Judah, where the citation says not the least among the princes; the bench resolves it as the scribes' own targumic paraphrase turning the point rather than mistaking it, since the town least in size is greatest in destiny. The Governor that shall rule carries the shepherd verb, poimaino, the first sounding of the shepherd thread that runs to the smitten shepherd of 26:31.
4. (vv. 7-8)
Matthew 2:7
“Privily - Secretly, privately. He did this to ascertain the time when Jesus was born. Diligently - Accurately, exactly. He took pains to learn the precise time when the star appeared. He did this because he naturally concluded that the star appeared just at the time of his birth, and he wished to know precisely how old the child was.”
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:7
“It wasn't the words of the magi that troubled Herod. It was the speculations of the legal experts about the words of the believing prophets. For the magi were seeking a king, but the Jews were declaring that Christ had been born. For this reason, turning aside the magi, Herod calls the Jews and asks them where the Christ should be born, he "whom you, having heard the magi, are now announcing." This is how the enemies of the truth may sometimes unwillingly speak the truth. They interpret the whole prophecy uselessly, failing to grasp what is necessary.”
Cyril of Alexandria· written before 444· FRAGMENT 10.3patristic
Matthew 2:7
“As the queen of the south, so the wise men of the east, will rise up in judgment against the men of that generation, and of this too, and will condemn them; for they came from a far country, to worship Christ; while the Jews, his kinsmen, would not stir a step, would not go to the next town to bid him welcome.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Matthew 2:8
“That I may come and worship him also - See Mat 2:2, and on Gen 17:3 (note), and Exo 4:31 (note). What exquisite hypocrisy was here! he only wished to find out the child that he might murder him; but see how that God who searches the heart prevents the designs of wicked men from being accomplished!”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 2:8
Herod treats the magi as ambassadors. For after a certain manner, they had come to the King of Israel in order to intercede that there might be peace between them and the Israelites. They hoped that, for Gentiles and Jews alike, there might be "one fold, one shepherd."
Cyril of Alexandria· written before 444· FRAGMENT 10patristic
privily called the wise men: Herod privily called the wise men, and the secrecy is the tell: a public inquiry would have sent the Sanhedrin to Bethlehem with him, so he splits the witnesses, dates the star in private, and dresses murder as devotion with that I may come and worship him also. The commentators read his diligent enquiry beside verse 16, where the same word returns as the measure of the massacre, two years old and under according to the time he had diligently enquired. The chapter runs on the contrast of the three responses to the born King: the magi worship, Herod plots, the scribes do nothing.
5. (vv. 9-10)
Matthew 2:9
“They who follow God in the dark shall find that light is sown, is reserved, for them. Israel was led by a pillar of fire to the promised land, the wise men by a star to the promised Seed, who is himself the bright and morning Star, Rev. xxii. God would rather create a new thing than leave those at a loss who diligently and faithfully sought him.”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Matthew 2:10
“When they saw the star,.... Which by its appearance, size, brightness, &c. they knew to be the same with that which they had seen, when in their own country; they rejoiced with exceeding great joy; a "pleonasm" or a redundancy of expression frequently used by the Hebrews, see Joh 4:6 and the Septuagint there; setting forth the rapture, the excess of joy they were in upon the sight of the star. Very probably before this, their hearts were sad, their countenances dejected, and they greatly discouraged, having taken so great a journey, and as yet to so little purpose.”
the star, which they saw in the east: now goes before them and stands over where the young child was, and the language strains every natural reading: conjunctions and comets do not halt over houses. The bench divides honestly between a providentially timed celestial event for the road's first leg and a directly miraculous light, Shekinah-like, for the last; Chrysostom argued no ordinary star walks south from Jerusalem to Bethlehem. The text does not adjudicate the mechanism and the exposition does not either; what it states is the gladness, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy, the strongest joy formula in the Gospel.
6. (vv. 11-12)
Matthew 2:11
“And when they were come into the house,.... Which they entered without making any inquiry, being fully assured by the star's standing right over it, that this was the house, and here was the king of the Jews, whom they were come to worship; and having entered in "they saw" some copies read ευρον, they found the young child, with Mary his mother; in her lap, or arms, or in the house with her, for by this time he might go alone.”
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 2:11
“They presented to him gifts - It was customary to offer some present to any eminent person whom they visited. And so it is, as travelers observe, in the eastern countries to this day.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Matthew 2:12
“Warned of God - This was done, doubtless, because, if they had given Herod precise information where he was, it would have been easy for him to send forth and kill him. And from this we learn that God will watch over those whom He loves; that He knows how to foil the purposes of the wicked, and to deliver His own out of the hands of those who would destroy them. In a dream - See the note at Mat 1:20.”
gold, and frankincense, and myrrh: are treasury gifts fit for an eastern court homage, and the old teachers read them as an unwitting confession: gold for a king, frankincense for God, myrrh for a man appointed to die. That triple reading is reception history, not the text's own claim, and the exposition names it as the church's meditation from Irenaeus onward. Two plain facts anchor the scene: they came into the house, not the stable, months having passed since the birth; and the gifts bankrolled the flight to Egypt that verse 13 commands. The magi exit warned of God in a dream, the second of the chapter's four dreams, and go home another way.
B. Flight into Egypt by Nightvv. 13-15
flee into Egypt: reverses the oldest road in Israel's memory, and verse 15 makes the reversal the point: that it might be fulfilled, Out of Egypt have I called my son. The citation is Hosea 11:1, and in Hosea the son is Israel in the exodus; Matthew is not misreading the prophet but stating his hermeneutic openly, that Jesus is the true Israel who retraces the nation's steps and gets them right, down into Egypt under threat of a child-killing king, and out again at God's call. The exposition states this as Matthew's own typology, the same pattern that carries him through the water at 3:13-17 and into forty wilderness days at 4:1-11 answering forty years, armed with three quotations from Deuteronomy's wilderness chapters.
Matthew 2:13
“And when they were departed,.... That is immediately, or as soon as they were gone, or in a very little time after, probably the same night, behold, the Angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream; it is very likely the same angel who appeared to him in such sort, Mat 1:20 "saying arise", awake out of sleep, and rise from thy bed directly, and take the young child and his mother. The angel does not say take thy wife and son; for though Mary was properly his wife, yet Christ was not properly his son.”
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:13
“To "the house of bondage?" Well, it once was that. But Egypt was a house of refuge before it was a house of bondage, and now it has but returned to its first use. and be thou there until I bring thee word; for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him--Herod's murderous purpose was formed before the Magi had reached Bethlehem.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew 2:13
“The angel appeareth to Joseph in a dream - See Mat 1:20. Flee into Egypt - Egypt is situated to the southwest of Judea, and is distant from Bethlehem perhaps about 60 miles. It was at this time a Roman province. There were many Jews there, who had a temple and synagogues (see the notes at Isa 19:18), and Joseph, therefore, would be among his own countrymen, and yet beyond the reach of Herod. The jurisdiction of Herod extended only to the River Sihon, or “river of Egypt,” and, of course, beyond that Joseph was safe from his designs.”
Matthew 2:14
“When he arose, he took the young child and his mother,.... That is, as soon as he awoke out of sleep, and rose from his bed, he did as he was commanded, he prepared for his journey; and very opportunely had the wise men presented their gifts; the gold they brought served to defray the expense of this journey, and which no doubt was so ordered by divine providence for this purpose.”
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:14
“Egypt full of idols; for after this enquiry for Him among the Jews, Christ leaving Judæa goes to be cherished among nations given to the vainest superstitions.”
Hilary of Poitiers· written before 367· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
Matthew 2:14
“EGYPT occupies a very singular position towards Israel. It was often the shelter of the seed of Abraham. Abraham, himself, went there when there was a famine in the land of his sojourn. To Egypt, Joseph was taken that he might escape from the death intended for him by his envious brothers and become the stepfather of the house of Israel. Into Egypt, as we all right well know, went the whole family of Jacob—and there they sojourned in a strange land. There Moses acquired the learning which was so useful to him.”
Matthew 2:15
“And was there until the death of Herod,.... Which was in a very short time; for Eusebius (i) says, that immediately, in a very little time after the slaughter of the children at Bethlehem, the divine vengeance inflicted diseases on him, which quickly brought him to his end; so that, according to the learned Dr. Lightfoot (k), Jesus was not above three or four months in Egypt.”
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:15
“The death of Herod - Herod died in the thirty-seventh year of his reign. It is not certainly known in what year he began his reign, and hence it is impossible to determine the time that Joseph remained in Egypt. The best chronologers have supposed that he died somewhere between two and four years after the birth of Christ, but at what particular time cannot now be determined. Nor can it be ascertained at what age Jesus was taken into Egypt.”
Matthew 2:15
“Out of Egypt have I called my son--Our Evangelist here quotes directly from the Hebrew, warily departing from the Septuagint, which renders the words, "From Egypt have I recalled his children," meaning Israel's children.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew 2:15
- QuotingHosea 11:1“When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called My son.”
'that it might be fulfilled... Out of Egypt I called my son' (contested: typological/corporate-Israel reading, each view at full strength)
C. Herod Kills the Children of Bethlehemvv. 16-18
slew all the children: Herod slew all the children in Bethlehem from two years old and under, and the bench sets two honest notes side by side: the village's size puts the number likely between ten and thirty, not the thousands of later legend, and the deed is entirely in character for the man Josephus records murdering his own sons, so that Augustus reportedly quipped it was safer to be Herod's pig than his son. Matthew hears Jeremiah 31:15, Rachel weeping for her children, Ramah's lament when the exiles were marshalled past her tomb; the formula here is then was fulfilled, not that it might be, the bench noting Matthew's care never to make God the purposer of the crime. In Jeremiah the weeping verse opens into refrain thy voice from weeping, and the exposition leaves that door where Matthew left it, ajar.
Matthew 2:16
“Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked,.... Herod, having waited a proper time for the return of the wise men, and they not coming, concluded he was tricked by them; though, no doubt, when they promised to return, and bring him word how things were, they seriously meant and designed a performance; but having met with a divine oracle, which ordered them another way, they thought it most advisable to obey God rather than man.”
3 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:16
“Slew all the children - This cruelty of Herod seems alluded to in very decisive terms by Macrobius, who flourished toward the conclusion of the fourth Century.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 2:16
“But (we hold the contrary): for Christ, by "accepting praise out of the mouth of babes and sucklings," has declared that neither childhood nor infancy is without sensibility, -the former of which states, when meeting Him with approving shouts, proved its ability to offer Him testimony; while the other, by being slaughtered, for His sake of course, knew what violence meant.”
Tertullian· written before 220· A Treatise on the Soulpatristic
Matthew 2:16
“The diseases and deaths of little children are proofs of original sin. But we must look upon this murder of the infants under another character: it was their martyrdom. How early did persecution commence against Christ and his kingdom!”
Matthew Henry· Commentary on the Whole Bible (1707-1721)puritan
Matthew 2:17
“Then was fulfilled that which was spoken,.... By the slaughter of the infants at Bethlehem was literally accomplished what had been predicted by Jeremy the prophet, in Jer 31:15. in Rama was there a voice heard, &c. That this prophecy belongs not to the Babylonish captivity, but the times of the Messiah, appears from the whole context; which manifestly speaks of the miraculous conception of Christ, of the blessings of his kingdom to be enjoyed by his people, and of the new covenant to be made with them, as I have shown in another place (r).”
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:17
“Then was fulfilled - The word “fulfilled,” here. is used evidently in the sense that the words in Jeremiah aptly express the event which Matthew was recording. Compare the notes at Mat 1:22. That which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet - Jeremiah. This quotation is taken from Jer 31:15. The original design of the prophecy was to describe the sorrowful departure of the people of Israel into captivity after the conquest of Jerusalem by Nebuzaradan.”
Matthew 2:17
“Then was fulfilled - A passage of Scripture, whether prophetic, historical, or poetical, is in the language of the New Testament fulfilled, when an event happens to which it may with great propriety be accommodated.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Matthew 2:17
- QuotingJeremiah 31:15This is what the LORD says: “A voice is heard in Ramah, mourning and great weeping, Rachel weeping for her children, and refusing to be comforted, because they are no more.”
tote eplerothe to rhethen (aorist indic. ho: 'THEN was fulfilled'), Matthew varies the frame from hina-subjunctive to tote-indicative for the Bethlehem slaughter
Matthew 2:18
“In Rama was there a voice heard - These words, quoted from Jer 31:15, were originally spoken concerning the captivity of the ten tribes; but are here elegantly applied to the murder of the innocents at Bethlehem. As if he had said, Bethlehem at this time resembled Rama; for as Rachel might be said to weep over her children, which were slaughtered or gone into captivity; so in Bethlehem, the mothers lamented bitterly their children, because they were slain. The word θρηνος, lamentation is omitted by the Codd. Vatic.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:18
“She was buried near this place; and is here beautifully represented risen, as it were out of her grave, and bewailing her lost children. Because they are not - that is, are dead. The preservation of Jesus from this destruction, may be considered as a figure of God's care over his children in their greatest danger.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Matthew 2:18
“Rachel, the mother of Joseph and Benjamin, was buried in the neighborhood of Bethlehem (Ge 35:19), where her sepulchre is still shown. She is figuratively represented as rising from the tomb and uttering a double lament for the loss of her children--first, by a bitter captivity, and now by a bloody death.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew 2:18
- QuotingJeremiah 31:15This is what the LORD says: “A voice is heard in Ramah, mourning and great weeping, Rachel weeping for her children, and refusing to be comforted, because they are no more.”
'Rahel weeping for her children', Matthew fulfillment formula (LXX Jer 38:15 = MT 31:15)
D. Home at Last to Nazareth
1. (vv. 19-22)
Matthew 2:19
“Many here err from ignorance of history, supposing the Herod who mocked our Lord on the day of His passion, and the Herod whose death is here related, were the same. But the Herod who was then made friends with Pilate was son of this Herod and brother to Archelaus; for Archelaus was banished to Lyons in Gaul, and his father Herod made king in his room, as we read in Josephus. From this we see that not Herod only, but also the Priests and Scribes had sought the Lord's death at that time.”
Jerome· written before 420· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:19
“But when Herod was dead,.... Who died, as before observed, a few months after this tragedy was acted; and, according to the (w) Jewish writers, on the seventh day of the month Cisleu, and which answers to the twenty fifth of our November: and was afterwards observed as a day of rejoicing by the Jews.”
Matthew 2:19
“Herod was dead - See the notes at Mat 2:15. Herod left three sons, and the kingdom was at his death divided between them. To Archelaus was given Judea, Idumea, and Samaria; to Philip, Batanea and Trachonitis; to Antipas, Galilee and Perea. Each of these was also called Herod, and these are the individuals who are so frequently referred to in the New Testament during the ministry. of the Saviour and the labors of the apostles. The above table will show at a glance the chief connections of this family, as far as they are mentioned in the sacred history.”
Matthew 2:20
“So Joseph and the Virgin had, like Abraham, to "go out, not knowing whither they went," till they should receive further direction. for they are dead which sought the young child's life--a common expression in most languages where only one is meant, who here is Herod.”
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
1 more voice on this verse
Matthew 2:20
“They are dead - Both Herod and Antipater his son; though some think the plural is here used for the singular, and that the death of Herod alone is here intended. But as Herod’s son Antipater was at this time heir apparent to the throne, and he had cleared his way to it by procuring the death of both his elder brothers, he is probably alluded to here, as doubtless he entered into his father’s designs. They are dead - Antipater was put to death by his father’s command, five days before this execrable tyrant went to his own place.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
Matthew 2:21
And he arose, and took the young child and his mother, and came into the land of Israel--intending, as is plain from what follows, to return to Bethlehem of Judea, there, no doubt, to rear the Infant King, as at His own royal city, until the time should come when they would expect Him to occupy Jerusalem, "the city of the Great King."
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown· Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)reformed
Matthew 2:22
“When he heard that Archelaus did reign - Herod, having put Antipater his eldest son to death, altered his will, and thus disposed of his dominions: he gave the tetrarchy of Galilee and Petrea to his son Antipas; the tetrarchy of Gaulonitis, Trachonitis, Batanea, and Paneadis, to his son Philip; and left the kingdom of Judea to his eldest remaining son, Archelaus. This son partook of the cruel and blood-thirsty disposition of his father: at one of the passovers, he caused three thousand of the people to be put to death in the temple and city.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
when Herod was dead: the angel's charge echoes Exodus 4:19 nearly word for word, go, for they are dead which sought thy life, Moses' own recall from Midian now spoken over the greater deliverer. Joseph obeys, hears that Archelaus reigns in Judea, and fears rightly; Archelaus opened his rule by killing three thousand in the temple courts and Rome deposed him within a decade. Warned of God in the fourth dream, Joseph turns aside into Galilee, and the exposition notes how the chapter's geography is steered entirely by revelation, four dreams moving one family while the powers that hold the map lose the child they hunt.
2. (v. 23)
Matthew 2:23
“He came and dwelt in Nazareth - (where he had dwelt before he went to Bethlehem) a place contemptible to a proverb. So that hereby was fulfilled what has been spoken in effect by several of the prophets, (though by none of them in express words, ) He shall be called a Nazarene - that is, he shall be despised and rejected, shall be a mark of public contempt and reproach.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
2 more voices on this verse
Matthew 2:23
“WE find the Jews speaking of Paul, and they say, "We have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes"—Acts 24:5. Thus it appears that our Lord and Master is called a Nazarene and His disciples are styled "the sect of the Nazarenes," while Christian doctrine was called, by the Jews, the heresy of the Nazarenes. Our Savior, though actually born at Bethlehem, was commonly known as Jesus of Nazareth, because Nazareth was the place where He was brought up.”
Matthew 2:23
“Had he meant to quote a particular text, he would not have written 'Prophets,' but 'the Prophet.' By thus using the plural he evidently does not take the words of any one passage in Scripture, but the sense of the whole. Nazarene is interpreted 'Holyd,' and that the Lord would be Holy, all Scripture testifies. Otherwise we may explain that it is found in Isaiah (c. 11:1.) rendered to the strict letter of the Hebrew. There shall come a Rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Nazarene shall grow out of His rootse.”
Jerome· written before 420· Catena Aurea by Aquinaspatristic
He shall be called a Nazarene: is the hardest citation in the Gospel, for no Old Testament verse says it, and Matthew signals as much by writing spoken by the prophets, plural, a summary rather than a quotation. Three readings hold the field and the exposition names all three: the wordplay on netzer, the Branch of Isaiah 11:1, so that the village name preaches the Branch prophecies; the despised-place reading, Nazareth as a byword (John 1:46) fulfilling the prophets' despised-and-rejected Messiah in sum; and the older Nazarite echo, which the bench mostly declines since Jesus took no such vow. The first two are not rivals, since a netzer is a shoot from a felled stump, obscurity written into the word itself, and the chapter that opened with a king born in David's city closes with him growing up in a town the Scriptures never name.
This page carries no textual note on Matthew 2. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →
Keep studying
On this page
Studies8
On this verse
On this chapter
On this book
Words12
Subjects1
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The context
Chuck Missler, Learn the Bible in 24 Hours; John Gill, Exposition of the Old and New Testaments and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Gospels; Carl Friedrich Keil, Biblical Commentary on the Minor Prophets, on Hosea 11; Flavius Josephus; Irenaeus, Against Heresies, Book III; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Lightfoot, Horae Hebraicae et Talmudicae on Matthew and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
