Matthewchapter 12
50 verses · Matthew, by tradition · AD 50 to 65 · The Gospels
Key verse
At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn, and to eat.
It stands in Grain on the Sabbath; the Lord of the Sabbath, verses 1 to 8.
The chapter
Chapter summary
Sabbath controversies. The grain fields, the withered hand. Jesus as Lord of the Sabbath. The Beelzebub accusation answered with the kingdom-divided argument and the blasphemy-of-the-Spirit warning. The sign of Jonah promised. Jesus' true family. Whosoever does the Father's will is brother, sister, and mother.
Context
Gospel · Matthew · Matthew overview
The world behind this chapter
Matthew 12The history
Walking through a neighbour's field and picking heads of grain by hand was legal, the Law explicitly allowed it, so long as you used no sickle. The dispute is not theft; it is the day. Jewish teachers had worked out a list of thirty-nine kinds of labour forbidden on the Sabbath, and reaping and threshing were on it. Rubbing grain in the palm looked, to a strict eye, like both.
The rest of the history, and what it meant to them
The same logic governed healing. It was widely agreed that a life in danger overrode the Sabbath, but a withered hand had been withered for years and could wait a day. Jesus answers with a case everyone accepted: a man whose only sheep fell into a pit on the Sabbath would pull it out.
Exorcism was not unheard of. Jewish exorcists worked with formulas and names, and Josephus describes such practices. The charge against Jesus is therefore not that he casts out demons but whose power he uses, and Beelzebul was a mocking name built from an old Philistine deity.
The two witnesses called from outside Israel would have stung. Nineveh was Assyria's capital, the empire that destroyed the northern kingdom, and it repented at one reluctant prophet's preaching. The Queen of the South travelled a vast distance to hear Solomon.
What it meant to them
The clash is over authority, not calendar detail. Something greater than the temple, greater than Jonah, greater than Solomon is standing in the grainfield, and the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath itself.
For readers whose Sabbath practice was being examined by former teachers, the chapter both defended them and warned them. The unforgivable thing named here is not a lapse in observance but looking straight at the Spirit's work and calling it demonic.
Sources cited
- Craig S. Keener, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament
- Alfred Edersheim, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah
Where the chapter sits
Matthew 12 falls in Mission of the Twelve (chapters 10). Discourse 2: sending and cost.
Before it: Sermon on the Mount, chapters 5–7. After it: Parables of the Kingdom, chapters 13.
The whole shape of Matthew→The structure of this chapter
Threads running through this chapter
- The sign of the prophet JonahType, v. 40
Places1
The heads below are this chapter's scenes. The numbered points under each are its verses.
A. Grain on the Sabbath; the Lord of the Sabbath
1. (vv. 1-2)
through the corn: The disciples plucking corn through the fields on the sabbath broke no law of Moses, since Deuteronomy 23:25 allowed a hungry traveller to pluck ears by hand; the Pharisees' charge is against their own oral tradition, which classed plucking as reaping and rubbing as threshing. The bench reads the accusation as the fence around the law swallowing the law it was meant to protect. Jesus answers not by denying the tradition's authority outright but by setting two greater precedents beside it.
2. (vv. 3-4)
what David did: sends the Pharisees to their own history, 1 Samuel 21:1-6, where David and his men ate the shewbread reserved for the priests alone. The bench notes the argument's force: if human need excused a breach of ceremonial law for Israel's anointed king, how much more for the Son of David's own men, on a point of tradition rather than of written commandment. Jesus meets legalists on their own ground, Scripture against tradition, rather than dismissing the sabbath itself.
3. (vv. 5-6)
profane the sabbath, and are blameless?: The priests profane the sabbath and are blameless, doubling the sacrifices on that day per Numbers 28:9-10, because temple service outranks the day's rest. Then comes the claim the Pharisees could not answer without conceding the case: one greater than the temple is here. The bench reads this as the first stroke of the greater-than chain that runs through the chapter to greater than Jonas and greater than Solomon at verses 41 and 42, Jesus placing himself above the very house that housed God's presence.
4. (vv. 7-8)
Matthew 12:7
- QuotingHosea 6:6“For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and the knowledge of God rather than burnt offerings.”
'I will have mercy, and not sacrifice', Sabbath grainfield defense
not sacrifice: I will have mercy, and not sacrifice repeats Hosea 6:6, already quoted at 9:13, and the bench reads the repetition as deliberate: the Pharisees have twice now condemned the guiltless for want of the very mercy the prophet named. The claim that follows settles the whole controversy at its root, for the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day; the day belongs to him who instituted it, and he defines its rightful use rather than being bound by another's fence around it.
B. The Withered Hand Restored; the Chosen Servant
1. (vv. 9-10)
into their synagogue: He went into their synagogue, and the withered hand meets him there along with the same accusers, their question is it lawful to heal on the sabbath days asked not to learn but that they might accuse him. The bench notes the man's hand is withered, atrophied by disuse or old injury rather than freshly broken, so no emergency forces the timing; the Pharisees have staged the test themselves, and Jesus takes it up in the open.
2. (vv. 11-13)
shall have one sheep: The sheep fallen into a pit is an argument from their own practice, for the rabbis themselves permitted rescuing an animal's body on the sabbath though a stricter later ruling forbade it; Jesus argues from the lesser mercy they already grant to the greater mercy a man deserves. Stretch forth thine hand asks the man to do the very thing his withered limb could not do, and the healing comes in the act of obedience itself, the hand restored whole even as it moves.
3. (v. 14)
held a council against him: The Pharisees held a council against him immediately after a healing they could not deny, and the bench marks the plain contradiction: a man's hand is made whole and the response is a plot to destroy the healer. Mark 3:6 names the Herodians joining them here, an alliance of religious and political enemies who agreed on nothing else; the sabbath question has become a capital matter within a single chapter.
4. (vv. 15-16)
he withdrew himself from thence: Jesus withdrew himself from thence rather than force the conflict to its hour before the appointed time, and he healed the multitudes that followed while charging them not to make him known. The bench reads the charge for silence as consistent with the whole Gospel's pattern, the messianic secret that keeps popular acclaim from forcing a premature crisis, and Matthew is about to explain the withdrawal itself as prophecy fulfilled rather than mere caution.
5. (vv. 17-18)
Matthew 12:18
“He shall show judgment to the heathens - That is, he shall publish the merciful Gospel to them also: the Hebrew word signifies either mercy or justice.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Matthew 12:18
- QuotingIsaiah 42:1“Here is My Servant, whom I uphold, My Chosen One, in whom My soul delights. I will put My Spirit on Him, and He will bring justice to the nations.
'Behold my servant, whom I have chosen', Servant fulfillment formula
spoken by Esaias the prophet: introduces the longest Old Testament quotation in Matthew, Isaiah 42:1-4, and the bench reads its placement as pointed: directly after Jesus withdraws from a murder plot rather than fighting it, the prophet's servant is named, my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased, the same words the Father spoke at the baptism. The servant's mission to shew judgment to the Gentiles anticipates the chapter's own turn toward Nineveh and the queen of the south.
6. (vv. 19-21)
Matthew 12:20
“A bruised reed - A convinced sinner: one that is bruised with the weight of sin: smoking flax - One that has the least good desire, the faintest spark of grace: till he send forth judgment unto victory - That is, till he make righteousness completely victorious over all its enemies.”
John Wesley· Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (1755)evangelical
Matthew 12:20
“A bruised reed shall he not break,.... Various are the thoughts of interpreters, about what is meant by this, and by the smoking flax shall he not quench. Some think the Scribes and Pharisees are designed, whose power Christ could easily crush, and their wrath and fury restrain, but would not, till the time of his vengeance was come. Others that the publicans and sinners are intended, of whose conversion and salvation there were more hope than of the Scribes and Pharisees; and which Christ greatly sought after, and therefore cherished and encouraged them in his ministry and conversation.”
Matthew 12:20
“A bruised reed shall he not break - A reed is, in Scripture, the emblem of weakness, Eze 29:6; and a bruised reed must signify that state of weakness that borders on dissolution and death. And smoking flax shall he not quench - Λινον τυφομενον. Λινος means the wick of a lamp, and τυφομενον is intended to point out its expiring state, when the oil has been all burnt away from it, and nothing is left but a mere snuff, emitting smoke.”
Adam Clarke· Commentary on the Bible (1810-1826)evangelical
He shall not strive, nor cry: describes exactly the manner just shown, withdrawal rather than public contention, and the bruised reed and smoking flax picture a ministry that does not finish off the weak or nearly spent. The bench reads these as the gentlest verses applied to the sternest week yet in the chapter, the same hand that will pronounce the unpardonable sin two verses later shown here as tender toward the bruised; the Gentiles trusting in his name closes the citation on the note the whole book will end on at 28:19.
C. A House Divided and the Sin That Is Not Forgiven
1. (vv. 22-23)
blind, and dumb: One possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb receives sight and speech together, and the crowd's question, is not this the son of David, is the plainest messianic confession the common people make in the Gospel so far, echoing the thread first raised at 9:27. The bench notes the double affliction made the case undeniable to any onlooker; there was no room left for the accusation of mere natural skill, which forces the Pharisees to the darker explanation that follows.
2. (v. 24)
prince of the devils: This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils is the Pharisees' answer to a miracle they cannot deny and will not honour, naming the Philistine deity of Ekron, literally lord of the flies, mockingly applied to Satan. The bench reads the charge as the very edge of the unpardonable line Jesus is about to name, attributing the plain work of the Spirit to the ruler of demons while standing in front of the evidence itself.
3. (vv. 25-26)
brought to desolation: Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation answers the charge on its own terms before any defence of himself: if Satan cast out Satan, his kingdom cannot stand, since no ruler funds the destruction of his own house. The bench notes Jesus knew their thoughts before they spoke them aloud, and the logic he offers is not a plea but an exposure, the accusation self-defeating on its own premise.
4. (vv. 27-28)
your children cast them out?: By whom do your children cast them out turns the accusation back on its makers, since Jewish exorcists operated in this period and the Pharisees never called their own practitioners servants of Beelzebub; therefore they shall be your judges. If I cast out devils by the Spirit of God then the kingdom of God is come unto you follows as the chapter's own positive claim, the exorcisms themselves standing as evidence that the kingdom has arrived rather than a sign yet future.
5. (v. 29)
spoil his goods: Entering the strong man's house to spoil his goods pictures Satan as a householder disarmed, and the binding must come first, before the goods, the possessed men and women, can be taken back. The bench reads this as Jesus naming his own exorcisms plainly: he has already bound the strong man in the wilderness temptation of chapter 4, and every deliverance since is the plunder of a house whose master no longer holds it unopposed.
6. (v. 30)
gathereth not with me scattereth abroad: He that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad closes the argument with no room left for neutrality; the man who will not confess the Spirit's work for what it is has, by that refusal, taken the scattering side. The bench reads this verse as the hinge into the warning that follows, since the crowd has just watched the Spirit's work named as Satan's, and the next words tell them precisely what ground they are standing on.
7. (vv. 31-32)
blasphemy against the Holy Ghost: The blasphemy against the Holy Ghost that shall not be forgiven has drawn several readings, named honestly rather than settled by the exposition. Some hold it names the specific act just committed, seeing the Spirit's undeniable work firsthand and calling it Satan's, a sin bound to that unrepeatable moment of eyewitness rejection; others read it as a settled, final state of hardened unbelief maintained against the Spirit's testimony until death, so that the sin is unpardonable because repentance never comes rather than because forgiveness is withheld from a seeking heart; a speaking word against the Son of man, by contrast, may reflect ignorance of who stands before them and is forgiven. The bench across these readings agrees on the pastoral word that follows from all three: a soul troubled over having committed it has, by that very fear, given the evidence that it has not.
8. (v. 33)
the tree is known by his fruit: Make the tree good, and his fruit good returns to the fig-tree logic of 7:17-20, now aimed directly at the men who just called good fruit evil. The bench reads the verse as the needed bridge from the unpardonable sin back to ordinary accountability, since the tree is known by his fruit and the Pharisees' own words in this chapter are about to be weighed on that same scale.
9. (vv. 34-35)
generation of vipers: O generation of vipers repeats John the Baptist's own charge at 3:7, now spoken by the greater one John announced, and how can ye, being evil, speak good things presses the same tree-and-fruit logic onto speech itself. Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh names the heart, not merely the tongue, as the source under judgment; a good man's treasure and an evil man's treasure each surface in what they say, whether they intend it or not.
10. (vv. 36-37)
idle word: Every idle word that men shall speak extends the coming account to speech that seems weightless, the careless remark rather than the deliberate lie, and the bench reads idle as unprofitable or unemployed rather than merely trivial, words that do no work and bear no fruit. By thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned sets speech as evidence at the judgment, the fruit by which the tree already named in verse 33 is finally read.
D. The Sign of Jonah and the House Swept Empty
1. (vv. 38-39)
we would see a sign from thee: Master, we would see a sign from thee comes from scribes and Pharisees who have just watched a blind and dumb demoniac healed before their own eyes, and the bench reads the request as proof of the hardened unbelief just described, demanding a further sign after refusing the one already given. An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign names the request itself as the symptom, spiritual adultery being the prophets' own word for covenant unfaithfulness, and the only sign granted will be the sign of the prophet Jonas.
2. (v. 40)
the whale’s belly: As Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly names the sign directly, the Son of man's own burial and resurrection. The reckoning of three days and three nights from a Friday crucifixion to a Sunday rising has drawn two readings: the majority reading counts by the Jewish practice where any part of a day stands for the whole, so that a portion of Friday, all of Saturday, and a portion of Sunday together answer the formula; a minority reading places the crucifixion on a Wednesday to reach a literal seventy-two hours. The bench names both without forcing the text past what it plainly claims, that the sign given is death and resurrection, not a chronology puzzle to be solved before the sign can be believed.
3. (vv. 41-42)
men of Nineveh: The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation names Gentile pagans who repented at a foreign prophet's single sermon, and the queen of the south who travelled far to hear Solomon's wisdom stands as the second Gentile witness against a generation that has both greater than Jonas and greater than Solomon standing in front of them and will not repent. The bench reads this as the chapter's own completion of the greater-than chain begun at verse 6, greater than the temple, greater than Jonas, greater than Solomon, three claims naming one person.
4. (vv. 43-45)
walketh through dry places: The unclean spirit that walketh through dry places, finds no rest, and returns to find the house empty, swept, and garnished, gives the picture of a life reformed but not filled, cleaned of one occupant and left vacant for seven others worse than himself. The bench applies this directly to the generation just addressed, Even so shall it be also unto this wicked generation, a nation that had reformed under John's preaching and swept its house of idolatry yet stood empty of the greater presence now offered it, primed for a worse ruin than before.
E. Who Are My Mother and My Brothers?
1. (vv. 46-47)
stood without, desiring to speak with him: His mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him while he yet talked to the multitude inside, and the bench notes the ordinary family concern behind the visit, Mark 3:21 recording that his own kin had gone out to restrain him, fearing for his safety amid the mounting hostility just narrated. The interruption sets up the sharpest family saying in the Gospel so far.
2. (vv. 48-50)
Who is my mother?: and who are my brethren? is not a denial of Mary and his brothers by blood but a redrawing of the family's true boundary, stretching his hand toward the disciples with behold my mother and my brethren. Whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother makes obedience, not descent, the entry into Christ's own household, a claim that answers the son-of-David question raised earlier in the chapter by widening sonship itself into a family of the will.
This page carries no textual note on Matthew 12. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →
Keep studying
On this page
Studies13
Places1
Words12
Subjects1
Sources for this chapter
The summary
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Calvin, Commentaries; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.
The context
E. B. Pusey, The Minor Prophets: A Commentary.
The exposition
Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Gospels; Carl Friedrich Keil, Biblical Commentary on Isaiah, on chapter 42; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Calvin, Commentary on a Harmony of the Evangelists; John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of Matthew; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Lightfoot, Horae Hebraicae et Talmudicae on Matthew; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament and Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible.
