Skip to content
mannafest.faith
Ezekiel

Summary

Chapter summary

Two sisters, Oholah and Oholibah (Samaria and Jerusalem) who played the harlot in Egypt in their youth and never left the habit. Oholah doted on the Assyrians, her neighbors clothed in blue, and was given into their hand. Oholibah was more corrupt than her sister: she doted on Assyria too, then on the Chaldeans she saw portrayed in vermilion upon the wall, and sent messengers to Babylon. And when they came, her soul was alienated from them. So her lovers become her judges. The sisters' cup passes from one to the other, 'a cup of astonishment and desolation,' deep and large, to be drunk and then broken and gnawed at its shards.

Context

Prophecy · EzekielEzekiel overview

  • A. 1–10 Oholah's lust for Assyria and her end
  • B. 11–21 Oholibah, the younger sister, who was worse
  • C. 22–35 The cup of horror pressed into her hand
  • D. 36–49 Both sisters judged by righteous men

The outline

  1. A.Oholah's lust for Assyria and her endvv. 1 to 10

    Read vv. 1 to 10
  2. B.Oholibah, the younger sister, who was worsevv. 11 to 21

    Read vv. 11 to 21
  3. C.The cup of horror pressed into her handvv. 22 to 35

    Read vv. 22 to 35
  4. D.Both sisters judged by righteous menvv. 36 to 49

    Read vv. 36 to 49

The world behind this chapter

Ezekiel 23
When
The Babylonian exile, before Jerusalem's fall · c. 589–588 BC
Where
Tel Abib, retelling the foreign policy of both Israelite kingdoms as the story of two sisters
Who first heard it
Exiles who thought of alliances as sensible statecraft, not betrayal

The history

The two sisters are named for tents: Oholah, her tent, is Samaria and the northern kingdom; Oholibah, my tent is in her, is Jerusalem, where the sanctuary stood. The names carry the difference in guilt before the story starts.

Their sin is described as adultery, but the events behind it are treaties. Samaria courted Assyria — officers in blue, governors and commanders, handsome young men on horseback — and Assyrian palace reliefs show exactly those cavalrymen in exactly that finery. Judah's kings paid tribute to Assyria too; Ahaz travelled to meet Tiglath-pileser III in Damascus and had a copy of the altar he saw there installed in the Jerusalem temple.

Then Jerusalem sees Babylonians portrayed in vermilion on a wall — men with belts around their waists and flowing turbans on their heads — and sends messengers to them. Babylonian art really did use brightly painted and glazed brick reliefs, so this is a picture of falling for an image before you have met the man.

The reason a treaty counted as unfaithfulness is not obvious to modern readers. In that world a vassal treaty meant recognizing the overlord's gods as witnesses and often importing his worship. Political dependence and religious compromise arrived in the same delegation, which is why the prophets treat foreign alliances as a marriage betrayal rather than a policy disagreement.

The judgment is that the lovers turn on her. Assyria destroyed Samaria in 722 BC. Babylon besieged Jerusalem. In both cases the empire courted became the empire that came.

What it meant to them

Jerusalem's leaders had watched Samaria's destruction a hundred and thirty years earlier and drawn no lesson from it. Ezekiel says the younger sister saw the whole thing and became more corrupt than her.

For exiles still hoping a clever alliance with Egypt would rescue the city, the chapter is a history lesson with a single point: every empire Judah ever climbed into bed with eventually arrived with an army.

Sources cited

  • John H. Walton, Victor H. Matthews and Mark W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament
  • The annals of Tiglath-pileser III and Assyrian palace reliefs, British Museum
  • K. A. Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament

Every work MannaFest builds on →

The text of this chapter

This page carries no textual note on Ezekiel 23. Where this site has examined a place the manuscripts differ, the examination is in the manuscripts room. Every place this site examines →

This page draws on Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory; John Wesley, Notes on the Old Testament and Matthew Henry, Complete Commentary.