Matthew 19:8
in Matthew 19Jesus replied, “Moses permitted you to divorce your wives because of your hardness of heart; but it was not this way from the beginning.
BSB
The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾
ASV
He saith unto them, Moses for your hardness of heart suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it hath not been so.
KJV
He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.
⋯
This verse in Matthew 19
Commentary
17 notes on this verseWhat He says is to this purpose. Is it possible that God should so contradict Himself, as to command one thing at first, and after defeat His own ordinance by a new statute? Think not so; but, whereas Moses saw that through desire of second wives who should be richer, younger, or fairer, that the first were put to death, or treated ill, he chose rather to suffer separation, than the continuance of hatred and assassination.
This site's exposition
writing of divorcement
on Matthew 19:7-8
Why did Moses then command a writing of divorcement presses Jesus with Deuteronomy 24:1 itself, and his answer draws the line the whole exchange has been building toward, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you, not commanded, a concession to human sin rather than an institution of God's original design. From the beginning it was not so restates verse 4's appeal and makes plain that Moses' permission was a regulation for a fallen condition, limiting an evil already present rather than authorizing it fresh. The bench reads this as settling the Hillel-Shammai debate by refusing its terms altogether, the question was never how broadly to read uncleanness but whether divorce belonged to creation's design at all.
The record, by era
The Church Fathers5 voices
(ubi sup.) For how great was that hardness! When not even the intervention of a bill of divorce, which gave room for just and prudent men to endeavour to dissuade, could move them to renew the conjugal affection. And with what wit do the Manichæans blame Moses, as severing wedlock by a bill of divorce, and commend Christ as, on the contrary, confirming its force? Whereas according to their impious science they should have praised Moses for putting asunder what the devil had joined, and found fault with Christ who riveted the bonds of the devil.
So true, moreover, is it that divorce "was not from the beginning," that among the Romans it is not till after the six hundredth year from the building of the city that this kind of "hard-heartedness" is set down as having been committed.
There, while prohibiting divorce, He has given us a solution of this special question respecting it: "Moses," says He, "because of the hardness of your hearts, suffered you to give a bill of divorcement; but from the beginning it was not so" -for this reason, indeed, because He who had "made them male and female" had likewise said, "They twain shall become one flesh; what therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
(Verse 8.) He said to them: because Moses allowed you to divorce your wives due to the hardness of your hearts, but it was not like that from the beginning. This is what he meant: Can God be opposed to himself, so that he would command one thing before and then nullify his own command with a new one? It should not be understood this way. Rather, Moses, seeing that because of the desire for second wives, who were either richer, younger, or more beautiful, the first wives were being killed or leading a bad life, preferred to tolerate discord rather than continue with hatred and murders (Deut. XXIV). At the same time, consider that God did not allow it because of the hardness of your hearts, but Moses did, so that, according to the Apostle's counsel (1 Corinthians 7), it may be a human choice, not a commandment from God.
Therefore said He well, Moses suffered, not commanded. For what we command, that we ever wish; but when we suffer, we yield against our will, because we have not the power to put full restraint upon the evil wills of men. He therefore suffered you to do evil that you might not do worse; thus in suffering this he was not enforcing the righteousness of God, but taking away its sinfulness from a sin; that while you did it according to His law, your sin should not appear sin.
10 more voices on this verse
The Church Fathers2 voices
A commentator
John ChrysostomHomily on the Gospel of Matthew 62 · Written in the 5th century.
proposed
Nevertheless, unspeakable wisdom maketh a defense even for these things, and saith, "Moses for the hardness of your hearts" thus made the law. And not even him doth He suffer to remain under accusation, forasmuch as He had Himself given him the law; but delivers him from the charge, and turns the whole upon their head, as everywhere He doth. For again when they were blaming His disciples for plucking the ears of corn, He shows themselves to be guilty; and when they were laying a transgression to their charge as to their not washing their hands, He shows themselves to be the transgressors, and touching the Sabbath also: both everywhere, and here in like manner. Then because the saying was hard to bear, and brought on them much blame, He quickly directs back His discourse to that ancient law, saying as He had said before also, "But in the beginning it was not so," that is, God by His acts at the beginning ordained the contrary. For in order that they may not say, Whence is it manifest, that "for our hardness Moses said this?" hereby again He stoppeth their mouths. For if this were the primary law, and for our good, that other would not have been given at the beginning; God in creating would not have so created, He would not have said such things.
And concerning chastity, the holy word teaches us not only not to sin in act, but not even in thought, not even in the heart to think of any evil, nor look on another man's wife with our eyes to lust after her. Solomon, accordingly, …
The Medieval Church2 voices
Then the Lord, turning every accusation upon their own head, defends Moses by saying, "Moses did not set this law in contradiction to God, but rather he addressed this law to your depravity, so that when you in your licentiousness desired to come together with …
And he said to them. Here he answers the objection. And first he presents the answer; secondly the confirmation, because the Lord proves that a wife should not be put away from the authority of God, which is greater; therefore against the authority of God …
The Puritans and the Awakening1 voice
He saith unto them,....
The Nineteenth Century5 voices
Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts - It is dangerous to tolerate the least evil, though prudence itself may require it: because toleration, in this case, raises itself insensibly into permission, and permission soon sets up for command. Moses perceived that if divorce were not permitted, in many cases, the women would be exposed to great hardships through the cruelty of their husbands: for so the word σκληροκαρδια, is understood in this place by some learned men.
In these verses we have the mind of Christ declared on two subjects of great moment. One is the relation of husband and wife; the other is the light in which we should regard little children in the matter of their souls. It is difficult to overrate the importance of these two subjects: the well-being of nations and the happiness of society are closely connected with right views upon them. Nations are nothing but a collection of families.
A commentator
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown1802–1910
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
He saith unto them, Moses--as a civil lawgiver. because of--or "having respect to." the hardness of your hearts--looking to your low moral state, and your inability to endure the strictness of the original law. suffered you to put away your wives--tolerated a relaxation of the strictness of the marriage bond--not as approving of it, but to prevent still greater evils.
In these verses we have the mind of Christ declared on two subjects of great moment. One is the relation of husband and wife; the other is the light in which we should regard little children in the matter of their souls. It is difficult to overrate the importance of these two subjects: the well-being of nations and the happiness of society are closely connected with right views upon them. Nations are nothing but a collection of families. The good order of families depends entirely on keeping up the highest standard of respect for the marriage tie, and on the right training of children. We ought to be thankful that, on both these points, the great head of the church pronounced judgment so clearly. With respect to marriage, our Lord teaches that the union of husband and wife ought never to be broken off, except for the greatest of all causes, namely, actual unfaithfulness. In these days when our Lord was upon earth divorces were permitted among the Jews for the most trifling and frivolous causes. The practice, though tolerated by Moses to prevent worse evils—such as cruelty or murder—had gradually become an enormous abuse, and no doubt led to much immorality ( Malachi 2:14–16 ). The remark made by our Lord’s disciples shows the deplorably low state of public feeling on the subject. They said, “If the case of the man be so it is not good to marry ”They meant, of course, “if a man may not put away his wife for a slight cause at any time, he had better not marry at all.” Such language from the mouths of apostles sounds strange indeed! Our Lord brings forward a widely different standard for the guidance of his disciples. He first founds his judgment on the original institution of marriage.
A commentator
Albert Barnes1798–1870
Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869)
proposed
He saith unto them ... - Jesus admits that this was allowed, but still he contends that this was not the original design of marriage. It was only a temporary expedient growing out of a special state of things, and not designed to be perpetual. It was on account of the hardness of their hearts. Moses found the custom in use. He found a hard-hearted and rebellious people. In this state of things he did not deem it prudent to forbid a practice so universal; but it might be regulated; and, instead of suffering the husband to divorce his wife in a passion, he required him, in order that he might take time to consider the matter, and thus make it probable that divorces would be less frequent, to give her a writing; to sit down deliberately to look at the matter, and probably, also, to bring the case before some scribe or learned man, to write a divorce in the legal form. Thus doing, there might be an opportunity for the matter to be reconciled, and the man to be persuaded not to divorce his wife. This, says our Saviour, was a permission growing out of a particular state of things, and designed to remedy a prevailing evil; but at first it was not so. God intended that marriage should be between one man and one woman, and that they were only to be separated, in the case specified, by him who had formed the union. Hardness of your hearts - He speaks here of his hearers as a part of the nation. The hardness of you Jews; as when we say, we fought with England and gained our independence; that is, we, the American people, though it was done by our fathers. He does not mean to say, therefore, that this was done on account of the people whom he addressed, but of the national hardness of heart - the stubbornness of the Jewish people as a people.
How the passage was read
On Matthew 19:3-12On Matthew 19:3-12
“For any cause”: Jesus asked to pick a school
“Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause?” The last three words are the point. The two great Pharisaic teaching schools of the generation before Jesus, the houses of Hillel and Shammai, disagreed on record over the divorce grounds in Deuteronomy 24:1: Shammai's house allowed divorce only for unchastity, Hillel's house “even if she spoiled his dish,” and Rabbi Akiva later added “even if he found another fairer than she” (the Mishnah preserves all three positions, Gittin 9:10). “For any cause” is the Hillelite slogan. The questioners are asking Jesus, in Herod Antipas's territory where John the Baptist lost his head over a marriage, to take a side in a live intra-Pharisaic dispute.
Jesus declines the menu. He reaches behind Moses to creation (“from the beginning it was not so”), grounds marriage in Genesis 1:27 and 2:24, reads the Mosaic provision as concession to hard hearts, and lands nearer Shammai on the exception while resting the whole matter on ground neither school had made primary. The scene is only half understood until the reader knows there were two schools in the room.
This section is reception history: how the passage was read and kept in the Jewish tradition. Where a reading parts from an essential of the Christian faith, the section says so at that point.
Sources: Mishnah Gittin 9:10 (the schools' positions verbatim)
The words behind it
20 Greek wordsEvery Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.
| Greek | Sound | Meaning | Word study | In the Bible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Λέγει | legei | He says | G3004 → | 1325 times |
| αὐτοῖς | autois | to them | G846 → | 5565 times |
| ὅτι | hoti | that | G3754 → | 1292 times |
| Μωϋσῆς | mouses | Moses | G3475 → | 78 times |
| πρὸς | pros | in view of | G4314 → | 700 times |
| τὴν | ten | the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| σκληροκαρδίαν | sklerokardian | hardness of heart | G4641 → | |
| ὑμῶν | humon | of you | G4771 → | 2973 times |
| ἐπέτρεψεν | epetrepsen | allowed | G2010 → | |
| ὑμῖν | humin | you | G4771 → | 2973 times |
| ἀπολῦσαι | apolusai | to divorce | G630 → | 63 times |
| τὰς | tas | the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| γυναῖκας | gunaikas | wives | G1135 → | 211 times |
| ὑμῶν· | humon | of you; | G4771 → | 2973 times |
| ἀπ᾽ | ap᾽ | from [the] | G575 → | 640 times |
| ἀρχῆς | arches | beginning | G746 → | 55 times |
| δὲ | de | however | G1161 → | 2765 times |
| οὐ | ou | not | G3756 → | 1664 times |
| γέγονεν | gegonen | was [it] | G1096 → | 667 times |
| οὕτως.¶ | houtos | this way. | G3779 → | 208 times |
ΛέγειHe says
legeiG3004 →1325 times
αὐτοῖςto them
autoisG846 →5565 times
ὅτιthat
hotiG3754 →1292 times
ΜωϋσῆςMoses
mousesG3475 →78 times
πρὸςin view of
prosG4314 →700 times
τὴνthe
tenG3588 →19766 times
σκληροκαρδίανhardness of heart
sklerokardianG4641 →
ὑμῶνof you
humonG4771 →2973 times
ἐπέτρεψενallowed
epetrepsenG2010 →
ὑμῖνyou
huminG4771 →2973 times
ἀπολῦσαιto divorce
apolusaiG630 →63 times
τὰςthe
tasG3588 →19766 times
γυναῖκαςwives
gunaikasG1135 →211 times
ὑμῶν·of you;
humonG4771 →2973 times
ἀπ᾽from [the]
ap᾽G575 →640 times
ἀρχῆςbeginning
archesG746 →55 times
δὲhowever
deG1161 →2765 times
οὐnot
ouG3756 →1664 times
γέγονενwas [it]
gegonenG1096 →667 times
οὕτως.¶this way.
houtosG3779 →208 times
A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.
The walk
8 stopsEach card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.
Through
Jeremiah 6:16This is what the LORD says: “Stand at the crossroads and look. Ask for the ancient paths: ‘Where is the good way?’ Then walk in it, and you will find rest for your souls.…
it leads to
- Isaiah 30:21
And whether you turn to the right or to the left, your ears will hear this command behind you: “This is the way. Walk in it.”
- Deuteronomy 32:7
Remember the days of old; consider the years long past. Ask your father, and he will tell you, your elders, and they will inform you.
- Jeremiah 18:15
Yet My people have forgotten Me. They burn incense to worthless idols that make them stumble in their ways, leaving the ancient roads to walk on rutted bypaths instead of on the highway.
- Matthew 11:28–29
Come to Me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest.
- Jeremiah 7:23
but this is what I commanded them: Obey Me, and I will be your God, and you will be My people. You must walk in all the ways I have commanded you, so that…
- Isaiah 30:21
Through
Genesis 2:24For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.
it leads to
- Matthew 19:3–9
Then some Pharisees came and tested Him by asking, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any reason?”
- Ephesians 5:28–31
In the same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.
- Mark 10:6–12
However, from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’
- Matthew 19:3–9
Where this verse is studied
On this page
Studies2
On this verse
On this chapter
About Matthew

Who and where
1 name in this verse with a page on the site.
This page draws on 17 works. Open the list of works
This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Gospels; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Augustine of Hippo, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; J.C. Ryle, Expository Thoughts on the Gospels: Matthew; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; Jerome, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Jerome, Commentary on Matthew; John Chrysostom, Homily on the Gospel of Matthew 62; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); Pseudo-Chrysostom, Catena Aurea by Aquinas; Tertullian, On Monogamy; Tertullian, Against Marcion Book IV; Theophilus of Antioch, To Autolycus, Book III, Chapter 13; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Matthew and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Matthew.
