Hebrews 8:9
in Hebrews 8It will not be like the covenant I made with their fathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt, because they did not abide by My covenant, and I disregarded them, declares the Lord.
BSB
The same verse in ASV and KJV ▾
ASV
Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers In the day that I took them by the hand to lead them forth out of the land of Egypt; For they continued not in my covenant, And I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
KJV
Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
⋯
This verse in Hebrews 8
Commentary
15 notes on this verseA commentator
Albert Barnes1798–1870
Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869)
Not according to the covenant ... - An arrangement or dispensation relating mainly to outward observances, and to temporal blessings. The meaning is, that the new dispensation would be different from what was made with them when they came out of Egypt. In what respects it would differ is specified in Heb 8:10-12. Because they continued not in my covenant - In Jeremiah, in the Hebrew, this is, “while my covenant they brake.” That is, they failed to comply with the conditions on which I promised to bestow blessings upon them.
This site's exposition
no place would have been sought
on Hebrews 8:7-9
God found fault with the people, and His proof is Jeremiah 31:31 to 32. The new covenant is made with the house of Israel, and Jeremiah 31:35 to 36 fixes Israel as a nation like the sun and moon.
This site's exposition
when I took them by the hand
The words when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt tie the old covenant to the exodus. The covenant with Abraham is left standing.
The record, by era
The Church Fathers4 voices
Prophetic utterances are of three kinds: (1) some relating to the earthly Jerusalem; (2) some to the heavenly Jerusalem; (3) and some to both simultaneously. I think it proper to prove what I say by examples. The prophet Nathan was sent to convict King David of heinous sin and predict what future evils would happen to him because of his sin. Who can question that this pertains to the earthly city? There are other instances, sometimes addressed to the public at large for their safety and benefit, and sometimes addressed to someone in private who merited an utterance from God in order to know in advance about some event to guide his temporal life.The following prophecy, however, without a doubt references the heavenly Jerusalem. "Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, that I will make for the house of Israel, and for the house of Judah, a new testament: not according to the testament that I settled for their fathers in the day when I laid hold of their hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my testament, and I regarded them not, says the Lord. For this is the testament that I will make for the house of Israel: after those days, says the Lord, I will give my laws in their mind, and will write them upon their hearts, and I will see to them; and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people." Here, God himself is Jerusalem's reward. Its chief and entire good is to possess him and to be possessed by him. Both cities are indicated when the city of God is called Jerusalem and when it is prophesied that the house of God shall one day be in Jerusalem. This prophecy seems to be fulfilled when King Solomon builds that most noble temple. For these things both happened in the earthly Jerusalem, as history shows, and were types of the heavenly Jerusalem. […]
"But finding fault with them, He saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah: not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt: because they continued not in My covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord." Yea, verily. And whence does it appear that the first Covenant came to an end? He showed it indeed also from the Priest, but now he shows more clearly by express words that it has been cast out. But how is it "upon better promises"? For how, tell me, can earth and heaven be equal? But do thou consider, how he speaks of promises there in that other covenant also, that thou mayest not bring this charge against it. For there also, he says "a better hope, by which we draw nigh unto God" (Heb. vii. 19), showing that a Hope was there also; and in this place "better promises," hinting that there also He had made promises. But inasmuch as they were forever making objections, he says, "Behold! the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah." He is not speaking of any old Covenant: for, that they might not assert this, he determined the time also. Thus he did not say simply, "according to the covenant which I made with their fathers," lest thou shouldest say it was the one made with Abraham, or that with Noah: but he declares what covenant it was, "not according to the covenant which I made with their fathers" in the Exodus. […]
[The Lord] ascended into the retirement of a neighboring mountain and called his apostles to him there. From the height of that mystical seat he could instruct them in the loftier doctrines, signifying from the very nature of the place and act that it was he who had once honored Moses by speaking to him. He spoke with Moses then, indeed, with a more terrifying justice, but now with a holier mercy in order that what had been promised might be fulfilled when the prophet Jeremiah says, "Behold, the days are coming when I will complete a new covenant for the house of Israel and for the house of Judah. After those days, says the Lord, I will put my laws in their minds, and in their heart will I write them." He therefore who had spoken to Moses, spoke also to the apostles, and the swift hand of the Word wrote and deposited the secrets of the new covenant in the disciples' hearts. There were no thick clouds surrounding him as of old, nor were the people frightened off from approaching the mountain by frightful sounds and lightning. Rather, quietly and freely his discourse reached the ears of those who stood by. In this way the harshness of the law might give way before the gentleness of grace, and "the spirit of adoption" might dispel the terrors of bondage.
"in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt." So that they do not suppose that the exodus is according to the covenant with Abraham; for it has occurred in Christ, "For to your seed," …
The Medieval Church1 voice
398. – Then (v. 9) he describes the New Covenant: first, by its difference from the Old; secondly, by its own qualities. In regard to the first he does two things: first, he shows the distinction between the Old and New Testaments; secondly, the infirmity …
7 more voices on this verse
The Medieval Church1 voice
Lest anyone think that the covenant which was made with Abraham is being annulled, he added: "in the day when I took them by the hand." For, he says, I wish to annul the covenant spoken of in the book of Exodus, the covenant given …
The Puritans and the Awakening4 voices
), and Moses was the Mediator of that covenant, when God took them by the hand, to lead them out of the land of Egypt, which intimates the great affection, condescension, and tender care of God towards them. That this covenant was not found faultless (
quarantine:debris (2026-07-29) — leading-punctuation
When I took them by the hand - With the care and tenderness of a parent. And just while this was fresh in their memory, they obeyed; but presently after they shook off the yoke. They continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not - So that covenant was soon broken in pieces.
Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers,....
They dealt ungratefully with their God, and cruelly with themselves, and fell under God's displeasure. God will regard those who remain in his covenant, but will reject those who cast away his yoke from them. That it is decayed, grown old, and vanisheth away,
The Nineteenth Century2 voices
A commentator
Jamieson, Fausset & Brown1802–1910
Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (1871)
Even after the return from Babylon, idolatry was succeeded by what was not much better, formalism and hypocrisy (Mt 12:43). The law was (1) a typical picture, tracing out the features of the glorious Gospel to be revealed; (2) it had a delegated virtue from the Gospel, which ceased, therefore, when the Gospel came.
Not according to the covenant - The new covenant is of a widely different nature to that of the old; it was only temporal and earthly in itself, though it pointed out spiritual and eternal things. The new covenant is totally different from this, as we have already seen; and such a covenant, or system of religion, the Jews should have been prepared to expect, as the Prophet Jeremiah had, in the above place, so clearly foretold it. They continued not in my covenant - It should be observed that the word διαθηκη, which we translate covenant, often means religion itself; and its various precepts. The old covenant in general stated, on God’s side, I will be your God; on the Israelites’ side, We will be thy people. This covenant they brake; they served other gods, and neglected the precepts of that holy religion which God had delivered to them. And I regarded them not - Καγω ημελησα αυτων· And I neglected them or despised them; but the words in the Hebrew text of the prophet are ואנכי בעלתי בם veanochi baalti bam, which we translate, although I was a husband to them. If our translation be correct, is it possible to account for this most strange difference between the apostle and the prophet? Could the Spirit of God be the author of such a strange, not to say contradictory, translation of the same words? Let it be observed: 1. That the apostle quotes from the Septuagint; and in quoting a version accredited by and commonly used among the Jews, he ought to give the text as he found it, unless the Spirit of God dictated an extension of meaning, as is sometimes the case; but in the present case there seems to be no necessity to alter the meaning. 2. The Hebrew words will bear a translation much nearer to the Septuagint and the apostle than our translation intimates. […]
The words behind it
34 Greek wordsEvery Greek word of this verse in the order it stands, with what it means and the door to its own study. The last column counts the times a word stands in the whole Bible: the rarer the word, the more the places it appears belong together.
| Greek | Sound | Meaning | Word study | In the Bible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| οὐ | ou | not | G3756 → | 1664 times |
| κατὰ | kata | according to | G2596 → | 468 times |
| τὴν | ten | the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| διαθήκην | diatheken | covenant | G1242 → | 33 times |
| ἣν | hen | that | G3739 → | 1405 times |
| ἐποίησα | epoiesa | I made | G4160 → | 569 times |
| τοῖς | tois | the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| πατράσιν | patrasin | with fathers | G3962 → | 410 times |
| αὐτῶν | auton | of them | G846 → | 5565 times |
| ἐν | en | in | G1722 → | 2738 times |
| ἡμέρᾳ | hemera | [the] day | G2250 → | 389 times |
| ἐπιλαβομένου | epilabomenou | of having taken hold of | G1949 → | 19 times |
| μου | mou | by Me | G3165 → | 1936 times |
| τῆς | tes | the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| χειρὸς | cheiros | hand | G5495 → | 175 times |
| αὐτῶν | auton | of them | G846 → | 5565 times |
| ἐξαγαγεῖν | exagagein | to lead | G1806 → | |
| αὐτοὺς | autous | them | G846 → | 5565 times |
| ἐκ | ek | out of | G1537 → | 911 times |
| γῆς | ges | [the] land | G1093 → | 248 times |
| Αἰγύπτου, | aiguptou | of Egypt, | G125 → | 25 times |
| ὅτι | hoti | because | G3754 → | 1292 times |
| αὐτοὶ | autoi | they themselves | G846 → | 5565 times |
| οὐκ | ouk | not | G3756 → | 1664 times |
| ἐνέμειναν | enemeinan | did continue | G1696 → | |
| ἐν | en | in | G1722 → | 2738 times |
| τῇ | tea | the | G3588 → | 19766 times |
| διαθήκῃ | diatheke | covenant | G1242 → | 33 times |
| μου, | mou | of Mine, | G3165 → | 1936 times |
| κἀγὼ | kago | and I myself | G1473 →G2532 → | 839 times |
| ἠμέλησα | emelesa | disregarded | G272 → | |
| αὐτῶν, | auton | them, | G846 → | 5565 times |
| λέγει | legei | says | G3004 → | 1325 times |
| κύριος. | kurios | [the] Lord. | G2962 → | 711 times |
οὐnot
ouG3756 →1664 times
κατὰaccording to
kataG2596 →468 times
τὴνthe
tenG3588 →19766 times
διαθήκηνcovenant
diathekenG1242 →33 times
ἣνthat
henG3739 →1405 times
ἐποίησαI made
epoiesaG4160 →569 times
τοῖςthe
toisG3588 →19766 times
πατράσινwith fathers
patrasinG3962 →410 times
αὐτῶνof them
autonG846 →5565 times
ἐνin
enG1722 →2738 times
ἡμέρᾳ[the] day
hemeraG2250 →389 times
ἐπιλαβομένουof having taken hold of
epilabomenouG1949 →19 times
μουby Me
mouG3165 →1936 times
τῆςthe
tesG3588 →19766 times
χειρὸςhand
cheirosG5495 →175 times
αὐτῶνof them
autonG846 →5565 times
ἐξαγαγεῖνto lead
exagageinG1806 →
αὐτοὺςthem
autousG846 →5565 times
ἐκout of
ekG1537 →911 times
γῆς[the] land
gesG1093 →248 times
Αἰγύπτου,of Egypt,
aiguptouG125 →25 times
ὅτιbecause
hotiG3754 →1292 times
αὐτοὶthey themselves
autoiG846 →5565 times
οὐκnot
oukG3756 →1664 times
ἐνέμεινανdid continue
enemeinanG1696 →
ἐνin
enG1722 →2738 times
τῇthe
teaG3588 →19766 times
διαθήκῃcovenant
diathekeG1242 →33 times
μου,of Mine,
mouG3165 →1936 times
κἀγὼand I myself
ἠμέλησαdisregarded
emelesaG272 →
αὐτῶν,them,
autonG846 →5565 times
λέγειsays
legeiG3004 →1325 times
κύριος.[the] Lord.
kuriosG2962 →711 times
A shaded row is a word that stands 400 times or fewer in the Bible.
The walk
8 stopsEach card is a verse this one points to, and under it the verses that one points to in turn. Where several paths arrive at the same place, that place is listed first: the text keeps returning to it.
Through
Mark 8:23So He took the blind man by the hand and led him out of the village. Then He spit on the man’s eyes and placed His hands on him. “Can you see anything?” He…
it leads to
- Mark 7:33
So Jesus took him aside privately, away from the crowd, and put His fingers into the man’s ears. Then He spit and touched the man’s tongue.
- John 9:6–7
When Jesus had said this, He spit on the ground, made some mud, and applied it to the man’s eyes.
- Mark 7:33
Through
Psalms 77:20You led Your people like a flock by the hand of Moses and Aaron.
it leads to
- Exodus 13:21
And the LORD went before them in a pillar of cloud to guide their way by day, and in a pillar of fire to give them light by night, so that they could travel…
- Isaiah 63:11–12
Then His people remembered the days of old, the days of Moses. Where is He who brought them through the sea with the shepherds of His flock? Where is the One who set His…
- Exodus 14:19
And the angel of God, who had gone before the camp of Israel, withdrew and went behind them. The pillar of cloud also moved from before them and stood behind them,
- Psalms 78:52
He led out His people like sheep and guided them like a flock in the wilderness.
- Exodus 13:21
Through
Jeremiah 31:32It will not be like the covenant I made with their fathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt—a covenant they broke, though I was…
it leads to
- Exodus 24:6–8
Moses took half of the blood and put it in bowls, and the other half he sprinkled on the altar.
- Exodus 24:6–8
Through
Galatians 4:24These things serve as illustrations, for the women represent two covenants. One covenant is from Mount Sinai and bears children into slavery: This is Hagar.
it leads to
- Genesis 21:9–13
But Sarah saw that the son whom Hagar the Egyptian had borne to Abraham was mocking her son,
- Genesis 21:9–13
Where this verse is studied
On this page
Studies17
On this chapter
About Hebrews

Who and where
1 name in this verse with a page on the site.
This page draws on 13 works. Open the list of works
This page draws on Adam Clarke, Commentary on the Bible; Albert Barnes, Notes, Explanatory and Practical, on the Old and New Testaments (1832-1869); Augustine of Hippo, City of God 17.3; Jamieson, Fausset & Brown, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible; John Chrysostom, Homily on Hebrews 14; John Gill, Exposition of the New Testament (1746-1748); John Wesley, Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament; John Wesley, Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament; Leo the Great, SERMON 95.1; Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible; Oecumenius, The Pseudo-Oecumenian Catena on Hebrews; Theophylact of Ohrid, Commentary on Hebrews and Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Hebrews.
